Date post: | 17-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | amanda-jordan |
View: | 217 times |
Download: | 0 times |
ECE 476 Power System Analysis
Lecture 17: OPF, Symmetrical Faults
Prof. Tom Overbye
Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Special Guest Lecturer: TA Won Jang
Announcements
• Read Chapter 7• HW 8 is 12.19, 12.20, 12.26, 12.28; due October 29 in
class (no quiz) – P. 12.26: PW case 12.8– P. 12.28: PW case 12.28– Both posted on the webpage
• Second exam is Thursday Nov. 12 during class. Closed book, closed notes, one note sheet and calculators allowed
• Abbott Power Plant tour is Tuesday Nov. 10 during class
2
“DC” Power Flow
• The “DC” power flow makes the most severe approximations:– completely ignore reactive power, assume all the voltages
are always 1.0 per unit, ignore line conductance
• This makes the power flow a linear set of equations, which can be solved directly
1θ B P
3
Optimal Power Flow (OPF)
• OPF functionally combines the power flow with economic dispatch
• Minimize cost function, such as operating cost, taking into account realistic equality and inequality constraints
• Equality constraints– bus real and reactive power balance– generator voltage setpoints– area MW interchange
4
OPF, cont’d
• Inequality constraints– transmission line/transformer/interface flow limits– generator MW limits– generator reactive power capability curves– bus voltage magnitudes (not yet implemented in
Simulator OPF)
• Available Controls– generator MW outputs– transformer taps and phase angles
5
Two Example OPF Solution Methods
• Non-linear approach using Newton’s method– handles marginal losses well, but is relatively slow and
has problems determining binding constraints
• Linear Programming – fast and efficient in determining binding constraints, but
can have difficulty with marginal losses.– used in PowerWorld Simulator
6
LP OPF Solution Method
• Solution iterates between– solving a full ac power flow solution
• enforces real/reactive power balance at each bus• enforces generator reactive limits• system controls are assumed fixed • takes into account non-linearities
– solving a primal LP• changes system controls to enforce linearized
constraints while minimizing cost
7
Two Bus with Unconstrained Line
Total Hourly Cost :
Bus A Bus B
300.0 MWMW
197.0 MWMW 403.0 MWMW300.0 MWMW
8459 $/hr Area Lambda : 13.01
AGC ON AGC ON
13.01 $/MWh 13.01 $/MWh
Transmission line is not overloaded
With no overloads theOPF matchesthe economicdispatch
Marginal cost of supplyingpower to each bus (locational marginal costs)
8
Two Bus with Constrained Line
Total Hourly Cost :
Bus A Bus B
380.0 MWMW
260.9 MWMW 419.1 MWMW300.0 MWMW
9513 $/hr Area Lambda : 13.26
AGC ON AGC ON
13.43 $/MWh 13.08 $/MWh
With the line loaded to its limit, additional load at Bus A must be supplied locally, causing the marginal costs to diverge.
9
Three Bus (B3) Example
• Consider a three bus case (bus 1 is system slack), with all buses connected through 0.1 pu reactance lines, each with a 100 MVA limit
• Let the generator marginal costs be – Bus 1: 10 $ / MWhr; Range = 0 to 400 MW– Bus 2: 12 $ / MWhr; Range = 0 to 400 MW– Bus 3: 20 $ / MWhr; Range = 0 to 400 MW
• Assume a single 180 MW load at bus 2
10
Bus 2 Bus 1
Bus 3
Total Cost
0.0 MW
0 MW
180 MW
10.00 $/MWh
60 MW 60 MW
60 MW
60 MW120 MW
120 MW
10.00 $/MWh
10.00 $/MWh
180.0 MW
0 MW
1800 $/hr
120%
120%
B3 with Line Limits NOT Enforced
Line from Bus 1to Bus 3 is over-loaded; all buseshave same marginal cost
B3 with Line Limits Enforced
Bus 2 Bus 1
Bus 3
Total Cost
60.0 MW
0 MW
180 MW
12.00 $/MWh
20 MW 20 MW
80 MW
80 MW100 MW
100 MW
10.00 $/MWh
14.00 $/MWh
120.0 MW
0 MW
1920 $/hr
100%
100%
LP OPF redispatchesto remove violation.Bus marginalcosts are nowdifferent.
12
Bus 2 Bus 1
Bus 3
Total Cost
62.0 MW
0 MW
181 MW
12.00 $/MWh
19 MW 19 MW
81 MW
81 MW100 MW
100 MW
10.00 $/MWh
14.00 $/MWh
119.0 MW
0 MW
1934 $/hr
81%
81%
100%
100%
Verify Bus 3 Marginal Cost
One additional MWof load at bus 3 raised total cost by14 $/hr, as G2 wentup by 2 MW and G1went down by 1MW
13
Why is bus 3 LMP = $14 /MWh
• All lines have equal impedance. Power flow in a simple network distributes inversely to impedance of path. – For bus 1 to supply 1 MW to bus 3, 2/3 MW would take
direct path from 1 to 3, while 1/3 MW would “loop around” from 1 to 2 to 3.
– Likewise, for bus 2 to supply 1 MW to bus 3, 2/3MW would go from 2 to 3, while 1/3 MW would go from 2 to 1to 3.
14
Why is bus 3 LMP $ 14 / MWh, cont’d
• With the line from 1 to 3 limited, no additional power flows are allowed on it.
• To supply 1 more MW to bus 3 we need – Pg1 + Pg2 = 1 MW– 2/3 Pg1 + 1/3 Pg2 = 0; (no more flow on 1-3)
• Solving requires we up Pg2 by 2 MW and drop Pg1 by 1 MW -- a net increase of $14.
15
Both lines into Bus 3 Congested
Bus 2 Bus 1
Bus 3
Total Cost
100.0 MW
4 MW
204 MW
12.00 $/MWh
0 MW 0 MW
100 MW
100 MW100 MW
100 MW
10.00 $/MWh
20.00 $/MWh
100.0 MW
0 MW
2280 $/hr
100% 100%
100% 100%For bus 3 loadsabove 200 MW,the load must besupplied locally.Then what if thebus 3 generator opens?
16
Fault Analysis
• The cause of electric power system faults is insulation breakdown
• This breakdown can be due to a variety of different factors– lightning– wires blowing together in the wind– animals or plants coming in contact with the wires– salt spray or pollution on insulators
17
Fault Types
• There are two main types of faults– symmetric faults: system remains balanced; these faults
are relatively rare, but are the easiest to analyze so we’ll consider them first.
– unsymmetric faults: system is no longer balanced; very common, but more difficult to analyze
• The most common type of fault on a three phase system by far is the single line-to-ground (SLG), followed by the line-to-line faults (LL), double line-to-ground (DLG) faults, and balanced three phase faults
18
Lightning Strike Event Sequence
1. Lighting hits line, setting up an ionized path to ground 30 million lightning strikes per year in US! a single typical stroke might have 25,000 amps, with a
rise time of 10 s, dissipated in 200 s. multiple strokes can occur in a single flash, causing the
lightning to appear to flicker, with the total event lasting up to a second.
2. Conduction path is maintained by ionized air after lightning stroke energy has dissipated, resulting in high fault currents (often > 25,000 amps!)
19
Lightning Strike Sequence, cont’d
3. Within one to two cycles (16 ms) relays at both ends of line detect high currents, signaling circuit breakers to open the line nearby locations see decreased voltages
4. Circuit breakers open to de-energize line in an additional one to two cycles breaking tens of thousands of amps of fault current is no
small feat! with line removed voltages usually return to near normal
5. Circuit breakers may reclose after several seconds, trying to restore faulted line to service
20
Worldwide Lightning Strike Density
Source: http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2001/ast05dec_1/
Units are Lightning Flashes per square km per year; Florida istop location in the US; very few on the West Coast, or HI, AK. Thisis an important consideration when talking about electric reliability!
21
Fault Analysis
• Fault currents cause equipment damage due to both thermal and mechanical processes
• Goal of fault analysis is to determine the magnitudes of the currents present during the fault– need to determine the maximum current to insure devices
can survive the fault– need to determine the maximum current the circuit
breakers (CBs) need to interrupt to correctly size the CBs
22
RL Circuit Analysis
• To understand fault analysis we need to review the behavior of an RL circuit
( )
2 cos( )
v t
V t
Before the switch is closed obviously i(t) = 0.When the switch is closed at t=0 the current willhave two components: 1) a steady-state value2) a transient value
23
RL Circuit Analysis, cont’d
ac
2 2 2 2
1. Steady-state current component (from standard
phasor analysis)
2 cos( )i ( )
where ( )
ac
V tt
Z
Z R L R X
VI
Z
24
RL Circuit Analysis, cont’d
dc 1
1
ac dc 1
1
2. Exponentially decaying dc current component
i ( )
where T is the time constant,
The value of is determined from the initial
conditions:
2(0) 0 i ( ) i ( ) cos( )
2
tT
tT
Z
t C e
LT RC
Vi t t t C e
Z
VC
Z
cos( ) which depends on Z 25
Time varying current
26
RL Circuit Analysis, cont’d
dc
1
Hence i(t) is a sinusoidal superimposed on a decaying
dc current. The magnitude of i (0) depends on when
the switch is closed. For fault analysis we're just
2concerned with the worst case:
( )
VC
Zi t
ac dci ( ) i ( )
2 2( ) cos( )
2(cos( ) )
tT
tT
t t
V Vi t t e
Z Z
Vt e
Z
27
RMS for Fault Current
2 2RMS
22 2
2The function i(t) (cos( ) ) is not periodic,
so we can't formally define an RMS value. However,
as an approximation define
I ( ) ( ) ( )
2
This function has a maximum va
tT
ac dc
tT
ac ac
Vt e
Z
t i t i t
I I e
lue of 3
Therefore the dc component is included simply by
multiplying the ac fault currents by 3
acI
28
Generator Modeling During Faults
• During a fault the only devices that can contribute fault current are those with energy storage
• Thus the models of generators (and other rotating machines) are very important since they contribute the bulk of the fault current.
• Generators can be approximated as a constant voltage behind a time-varying reactance
'aE
29
3 bal. windings (a,b,c) – stator
Field winding (fd) on rotor
Damper in “d” axis
(1d) on rotor
2 dampers in “q” axis
(1q, 2q) on rotor
30
Synchronous Machine Modeling
Generator Modeling, cont’d
"d
'd
d
The time varying reactance is typically approximated
using three different values, each valid for a different
time period:
X direct-axis subtransient reactance
X direct-axis transient reactance
X dire
ct-axis synchronous reactance
31
Generator Modeling, cont’d
'
"
''
ac
" '
"d
For a balanced three-phase fault on the generator
terminal the ac fault current is (see page 386)
1 1 1
i ( ) 2 sin( )1 1
where
T direct-axis su
d
d
tT
d dda t
T
d d
eX XX
t E t
eX X
'd
btransient time constant ( 0.035sec)
T direct-axis transient time constant ( 1sec)
32
Generator Modeling, cont'd
'
"
''
ac
" '
'
DC "
A
The phasor current is then
1 1 1
1 1
The maximum DC offset is
2I ( )
where T is the armature time constant ( 0.2 seconds)
d
d
A
tT
d dda t
T
d d
tTa
d
eX XX
I E
eX X
Et e
X
33
Generator Short Circuit Currents
34
Generator Short Circuit Currents
35
Generator Short Circuit Example
• A 500 MVA, 20 kV, 3 is operated with an internal voltage of 1.05 pu. Assume a solid 3 fault occurs on the generator's terminal and that the circuit breaker operates after three cycles. Determine the fault current. Assume
" '
" '
A
0.15, 0.24, 1.1 (all per unit)
0.035 seconds, 2.0 seconds
T 0.2 seconds
d d d
d d
X X X
T T
36
Generator S.C. Example, cont'd
2.0
ac0.035
ac
6
base ac3
0.2DC
Substituting in the values
1 1 11.1 0.24 1.1
( ) 1.051 1
0.15 0.24
1.05(0) 7 p.u.0.15
500 10I 14,433 A (0) 101,000 A
3 20 10
I (0) 101 kA 2 143 k
t
t
t
e
I t
e
I
I
e
RMSA I (0) 175 kA37
Generator S.C. Example, cont'd
0.052.0
ac 0.050.035
ac
0.050.2
DC
RMS
Evaluating at t = 0.05 seconds for breaker opening
1 1 11.1 0.24 1.1
(0.05) 1.051 1
0.15 0.24
(0.05) 70.8 kA
I (0.05) 143 kA 111 k A
I (0.05
e
I
e
I
e
2 2) 70.8 111 132 kA
38
Network Fault Analysis Simplifications
• To simplify analysis of fault currents in networks we'll make several simplifications:– Transmission lines are represented by their series
reactance– Transformers are represented by their leakage reactances– Synchronous machines are modeled as a constant voltage
behind direct-axis subtransient reactance– Induction motors are ignored or treated as synchronous
machines– Other (nonspinning) loads are ignored
39
Network Fault Example
For the following network assume a fault on the terminal of the generator; all data is per unitexcept for the transmission line reactance
2
19.5Convert to per unit: 0.1 per unit
138100
lineX
generator has 1.05
terminal voltage &
supplies 100 MVA
with 0.95 lag pf
40
Network Fault Example, cont'd
Faulted network per unit diagram
*'a
To determine the fault current we need to first estimate
the internal voltages for the generator and motor
For the generator 1.05, 1.0 18.2
1.0 18.20.952 18.2 E 1.103 7.1
1.05
T G
Gen
V S
I
41
Network Fault Example, cont'd
f
The motor's terminal voltage is then
1.05 0 - (0.9044 - 0.2973) 0.3 1.00 15.8
The motor's internal voltage is
1.00 15.8 (0.9044 - 0.2973) 0.2
1.008 26.6
We can then solve as a linear circuit:
1I
j j
j j
.103 7.1 1.008 26.60.15 0.5
7.353 82.9 2.016 116.6 9.09
j j
j
42