ECEN 622 (ESS) Fall 2011 Practical Issues Designing Switched … Practical... · 2020. 10. 30. ·...

Practical Issues Designing Switched-Capacitor Circuit

ELEN 622 Fall 2011 Switched-Capacitor practical issues 1 / 27

Practical Issues Designing

Switched-Capacitor Circuit

Material partially prepared by

Sang Wook Park and Shouli Yan

ECEN 622 (ESS) Fall 2011



MOS switch

o Excellent Roff

o Non-idea Effect

Charge injection, Clock feed-through

Finite and nonlinear Ron

Cox Cov Cov

Ron

G

S D

G

S D



Charge Injection

o During TR. is turned on, Qch is formed at channel surface

When TR. is off, Qch1 is absorbed by Vs, but Qch2 is injected to C

o Charge injected through overlap capacitor

o Appeared as an offset voltage error on C

G

VS

Qch1 Qch2

C

( )thGSOXch VVWLCQ −=



Charge Injection Effect

o When clock changes from high to low, Qch2 is injected to C

o Compared to ideal sw., MOS sw. creates voltage error on Vout

Ideal sw.

MOS sw. 1V

0.1pF

CLK

Vout

CLK



Decrease Charge Injection Effect (1)

o Decrease the effect of Qch o Use either bigger C or small TR. (small ratio of Cox/C) o Increased Ron

W/L = 10/0.4

W/L = 1/0.4 1V

0.1pF

CLK

Vout




Single sw.

With dummy sw.

o Use dummy switch which provides opposite charge o Adjust size of dummy sw. for exact canceling o Needs opposite clock

1V 0.1pF

CLK

Vout

CLKb

10/0.4 3.1/0.4




NMOS sw.

CMOS sw.

o Use N/PMOS complementary switch o Both Qch cancel out due to their opposite polarity o Needs opposite clock, increased parasitic capacitance

1V 0.1pF

CLK

Vout

CLKb

10/0.4

23/0.4



Nonlinear Ron

N/PMOS

NMOS

o Ron varies with signal amplitude o CMOS sw. can adopt large signal o Needs opposite clock, increased parasitic capacitance

Vin

VDD

1.5V

GND

7.5/0.4

18/0.4 PMOS

Vin

Ron



Slow Settling due to high Ron

o Ron varies with signal amplitude o CMOS sw. can adopt large signal o Needs opposite clock, increased parasitic capacitance

Vin

CLK

10pF

Vout

20pF

CLKb

V1




Ideal sw.

NMOS sw.

o Small NMOS sw. (5/0.4) o With high Ron, output is not settled o In case of large signal input, N/PMOS sw. should be used

Vout

V1

Vout

V1




Ideal sw.

NMOS sw.

o Large NMOS sw. (20/0.4) o Low Ron makes output settled fast o Close to ideal sw.

Vout

V1

Vout

V1



Switch and Clock Arrangement

M1 M2

M3 M4

M5

M6

C

C3

C1

C2

CK

CKe

CKbe

CKb

CKb

CK

CK CKb

CKe CKbe

o M2, M4 : small sw., Others : large sw. o M2, M4 turn off earlier : minimize charge injection effect o Charge injection

M2, M4 (M3, M6) : Signal independent Others : Signal dependent



Switch and Clock Arrangement

Same sw. (5/0.4) Same CLK

Different sw. (30/0.4, 5/0.4) Early CLK

Ideal sw.



PSS vs. Transient Simulation

o PSS simulation is used to check the frequency response for Switched-capacitor circuit o Should be compared with transient simulation

fin = 100KHz

fin = 10KHz PSS-PAC simulation

fin = 200KHz



Capacitor Layout

o Capacitor is implemented with PIP (poly) or MIM (metal) o Total capacitance is the sum of Cox and Cfr’s o Ratio is more important than absolute value o Multiples of unit capacitor can minimize ratio error o Unit capacitor can be determined by process o Surrounding capacitor bank with dummies is preferred

Cox Cfr Cfr

Cox

Cfr

Cfr Cfr

Cfr

C1

C1

C2

C2 C2

D D D D D

D D D D D

D

D

D

D

D

32

21=

CC



Layout Example

o Example of SC biquad circuit (TSMC 0.35um)



Low Voltage Switched Capacitor Circuits

• Challenges of LV SC circuit design [cas95] – SC circuits are widely used in filters,

data converters, sample and hold, and other analog signal processing building blocks.

– LV SC circuit design is very challenging due to the difficulties involved in turning on MOS switches.

• Solutions – Low and/or multi Vt process – Clock boostering or bootstrap – Switched opamp

GON

VT,P VDD-VT,N

VDD

GON

VDD-VT,N VT,P

VDD

Switch conductance for high VDD(such as 5V)

Switch conductance for low VDD



Low Voltage Switched Capacitor Circuits (Cont’d)

• Low and/or multi Vt process [ada90] – Expensive – Switch leakage while it is off – Vt is not tightly controlled for low

Vt transistors • Clock boostering or bootstrap

– Earlier work ( see right figure ) required that transistors could sustain maximum breakdown voltage of 2Vdd [nak91, cho95, rab98]

– This could not be used in finer technologies due to reduced breakdown voltage

VDD

2VDD

2VDD

0

VDD

0

M1 M2

M3

M4

C1 C2



Low Voltage Switched Capacitor Circuits (Cont’d)

– Constant overdrive bootstrap clock driving solved this problem [abo99]

– Reliability is improved as each transistor just sustains Vdd as maximum voltage

– More power consumption and lower speed due to its complexity – Potential reliability problem during transient

φ1

φ1

φ1

φ1 φ1

A B

VDD

CB

At φ1 CB

VDD

A B

Msw

At φ1

A B

CB Msw



– Detailed schematic and wave form [abo99] • M1, M2, C1, C2 and the inverter could be shared by the switches

with the same phase, other components need to be repeated for every switch.

VDD

M1

M2

C1 C2

M3

C3

M4

M5

M7

M10

M9

M13

M8

φ1

φ1

φ1

Msw

M12 A B



• Switched opamp [cro94,bas97, pel98] – In conventional SC circuits, S1

is the critical switch, as it sees wide signal swing

– Switched opamp eliminated S1 by switching on and off the amplifier

– True low voltage operation – Potential of low power

consumption – Slower speed ( usually clock

freq. is around several KHz to 1 or 2 MHz ) due to the need to switch on and off the opamp

CFB

CIN

S1 S2 S3

S4

VREF Conventional SC circuits

Switched opamp circuits

CFB

CIN

S2 S3

S4

VREF



• Low voltage also poses difficulties for designing the SC Opamps – To maximize output voltage swing, cascoding of output

transistors should be avoided – To achieve required DC gain, two stage architecture may

have to be used instead of single stage OTA – Frequency compensation is an essential issue to make the

amplifier stable and fast settling – Input common mode bias voltage need to close one of the

supply rails to make input transistors operate correctly ( close to Vss -- PMOS input; close to Vdd – NMOS input )

– Input and output need to be biased at different DC levels, level shift may be necessary for switched opamp circuits



• LV SC opamp design example I [abo99] – Two-stage architecture is adopted to achieve high enough

gain – Simple output stage maximizes output voltage swing – First stage is folded-cascode stage with cascode load to

obtain a high gain, as nodes A and B have a small signal voltage swing, and supply voltage and VTN permit this luxury

M1 M2

M3 M4

M6

M8

M10

M5

M7

M9

M11

M13

M15

M12

M14

Cc Cc

VDD=1.5 V

VI+ VI- VO- VO+ A B



– Cascode frequency compensation [ahu83] is used to have a higher bandwidth over conventinal Miller compensation

– The functionality of the circuit is independent of VIN_CM setting, thus VIN_CM could be set to a DC level which makes the amplifier work properly

Cf

Cs

S1

S1

S1

VIN VOUT

1.5b AD

C

output

0 +VR -VR

VIN_CM

The X2 residue amplifier for 1.5b/stage pipeline A/D converter



• LV SC opamp design example II [rab97] – Two-stage architecture with miller compensation – Push-pull operation of the second stage maximize driving

capacity – Two common-mode feedback loops are required to

stablize the bias condition



• LV SC opamp design example III [pel98] – One-stage architecture is used due to relaxed system

requirement for the DC gain – Class AB operation lowers power consumption – Low voltage current mirror makes more room for the input

transistors



References

[abo99] A. M. Abo and P. R. Gray, “A 1.5-V, 10-bit, 14.3-MS/s CMOS pipeline analog-to-digital converter,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 599-606, May 1999 [ada90] T. Adachi, A. Ishikawa, A. Barlow, and K. Takasuka, “A 1.4 V switched capacitor filter,” IEEE CICC 1990, pp. 8.2.1-8.2.4, 1990 [ahu83] B. K. Ahuja, “An improved frequency compensation technique for CMOS operational amplifiers,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. SC-18, no. 6, pp. 629-633, Dec. 1983 [bas97] A. Baschirotto and R. Castello, “A 1-V 1.8-MHz CMOS switched-opamp SC filter with rail-to-rail output swing ,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 32, no. 12, pp. 1979-1986, Dec. 1997 [cas95] R. Castello, F. Montecchi, F. Rezzi, and A. Baschirotto, “Low-voltage analog filters,” IEEE Trans. Circuits and Systems – I, vol. 42, no. 11, pp. 827-840, Nov. 1995 [cho95] T. B. Cho and P. R. Gray, “A 10 b, 20 Msample/s, 35 mW pipeline A/D converter,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 166-172, March 1995 [cro94] J. Crols and M. Steyaert, “Switched-opamp: an approach to realize full CMOS switched-capacitor circuits at very low power supply voltages,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 936-942, Aug. 1994 [nak91] Y. Nakagome, et al. “An experimental 1.5-V 64-Mb DRAM,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 465-472, April 1991 [pel98] V. Peluso, P. Vancorenland, A. M. Marques, M. S. J. Steyaert, and W. Sansen, “A 900-mV low-power Σ∆ A/D converter with 77-dB dynamic range,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 33, no. 12, pp. 1887-1897, Dec. 1998 [rab97] S. Rabii and B. A. Wooley, “A 1.8-V digital audio sigma-delta modulator in 0.8 um CMOS,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 783-796, June 1997

Slide Number 1Slide Number 2Slide Number 3Slide Number 4Slide Number 5Slide Number 6Slide Number 7Slide Number 8Slide Number 9Slide Number 10Slide Number 11Slide Number 12Slide Number 13Slide Number 14Slide Number 15Slide Number 16Low Voltage Switched Capacitor CircuitsLow Voltage Switched Capacitor Circuits (Cont’d)Low Voltage Switched Capacitor Circuits (Cont’d)Slide Number 20Slide Number 21Slide Number 22Slide Number 23Slide Number 24Slide Number 25Slide Number 26References

Date post:	30-Jan-2021
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	0 times
Download:	0 times

ECEN 622 (ESS) Fall 2011 Practical Issues Designing Switched … Practical... · 2020. 10. 30. ·...

Documents