Date post: | 17-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | bernard-scott |
View: | 248 times |
Download: | 1 times |
Ecological EconomicsWeek 8
Tiago DomingosAssistant Professor
Environment and Energy SectionDepartment of Mechanical Engineering
Doctoral Program and Advanced Degree in Sustainable Energy Systems
Doctoral Program in Mechanical Engineering
Economic Growth
0
5.000
10.000
15.000
20.000
25.000
30.000
35.000
1870
1874
1878
1882
1886
1890
1894
1898
1902
1906
1910
1914
1918
1922
1926
1930
1934
1938
1942
1946
1950
1954
1958
1962
1966
1970
1974
1978
1982
1986
1990
1994
1998
2002
1990
Inte
rnat
ion
al G
eary
-Kh
amis
do
llars
GDP per capita UK
US
Germany
France
Japan
Source: http://www.ggdc.net/maddison/
Economic Growth
1
10
100
1.000
10.000
100.000
18
70
18
74
18
78
18
82
18
86
18
90
18
94
18
98
19
02
19
06
19
10
19
14
19
18
19
22
19
26
19
30
19
34
19
38
19
42
19
46
19
50
19
54
19
58
19
62
19
66
19
70
19
74
19
78
19
82
19
86
19
90
19
94
19
98
20
02
Lo
g [
1990
Inte
rnat
ion
al G
eary
-Kh
amis
do
llars
]
GDP per capita UK
US
Germany
France
Japan
Source: http://www.ggdc.net/maddison/
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
P
Q
MPC
MEC
MSC
MPB=MSB
Market Equilibrium to Social Optimum• Pigou taxes
– We have a negative externality which we want to internalise. • A tax shifts the marginal private cost curve up by the amount of the tax. Faced with this cost
increase, the producers have an incentive to reduce output to the socially optimum level by reducing the marginal externality to the marginal tax.
)(SOMECtaxPigou
Social optimum
Market equilibrium
Pig
ou ta
x
Market Equilibrium to Social Optimum• In a more generic way...