+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Ecological footprints of some nations already exceed available ecological capacity.

Ecological footprints of some nations already exceed available ecological capacity.

Date post: 18-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: joella-osborne
View: 221 times
Download: 3 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
41
Ecological footprints of some nations already exceed available ecological capacity.
Transcript
Page 1: Ecological footprints of some nations already exceed available ecological capacity.

Ecological footprints of some nations already exceed available ecological capacity.

Page 2: Ecological footprints of some nations already exceed available ecological capacity.

Our ecological ‘footprint’…1)

Before lecture on Tuesday,

take the quiz on www.myfootprint.org.

Insert your result in the top of the lecture outline, as shown on the LO (cut out the one shown), and bring the lecture outline to class.

Page 3: Ecological footprints of some nations already exceed available ecological capacity.

Chapter 15: Dynamics of predator-prey interactions

Page 4: Ecological footprints of some nations already exceed available ecological capacity.

Objectives• Adaptations of predators• Prey deterrents to predation• Do predators limit prey?

• Functional / numerical responses of predators to prey density

• Predator-prey synchronized cycles• How stabilize predator-prey interactions?• Laboratory studies of refugia/spatial heterogeneity

Page 5: Ecological footprints of some nations already exceed available ecological capacity.

x

What are predator adaptations to exploit prey?

Page 6: Ecological footprints of some nations already exceed available ecological capacity.

The jaws of snakes are adapted for grasping and swallowing large prey.

Page 7: Ecological footprints of some nations already exceed available ecological capacity.
Page 8: Ecological footprints of some nations already exceed available ecological capacity.

Predators vary in size relative to their prey.

Page 9: Ecological footprints of some nations already exceed available ecological capacity.

Prey deterrents to predation

• Group living

• Induced structural defense

• Chemical defense

• Cryptic coloration

• Aposematism

• Mimicry

Page 10: Ecological footprints of some nations already exceed available ecological capacity.

Prey have active adaptations for escaping their predators: chemical warfare!

Page 11: Ecological footprints of some nations already exceed available ecological capacity.

Palatable prey avoid predators passively via crypsis.

Page 12: Ecological footprints of some nations already exceed available ecological capacity.

Cryptic coloration - passive escape

Page 13: Ecological footprints of some nations already exceed available ecological capacity.

Unpalatable animals have warning coloration (aposematism). Predators learn from mistakes.

Figure 3

Page 14: Ecological footprints of some nations already exceed available ecological capacity.

Warning is even greater in groups…

Page 15: Ecological footprints of some nations already exceed available ecological capacity.

Top-down control Tri-trophic predators interactions

herbivores (prey)

plants

nutrients/light Bottom-up control

Page 16: Ecological footprints of some nations already exceed available ecological capacity.

Do predators control prey abundance?If…then…

Figure 6

Page 17: Ecological footprints of some nations already exceed available ecological capacity.

Is there a response of this predator to an increase in its prey? Why or why not?

territorial Heavyseed crop in 89

Figure 7

Page 18: Ecological footprints of some nations already exceed available ecological capacity.

Human activities have altered:1) predator-prey relations2) ‘top-down’ control

Page 19: Ecological footprints of some nations already exceed available ecological capacity.

Individual predators exhibit 3 types of functional responses to increasing prey density.

Page 20: Ecological footprints of some nations already exceed available ecological capacity.

Functional response: A change in rate of capture of prey by an individual predator as prey density changes.• Type I: Capture directly proportional

to prey density

• Type II: Capture levels off at high prey

density (predator satiation)

• Type III: as Type II, but is also low at low

prey density

• 1) heterogeneous habitat---> hiding places

• 2) lack of learned search behavior

• 3) switching to alternative prey

Page 21: Ecological footprints of some nations already exceed available ecological capacity.

***What type of functional response of kestrels to vole density?

Page 22: Ecological footprints of some nations already exceed available ecological capacity.

***What type of functional response of wolves to moose?

Page 23: Ecological footprints of some nations already exceed available ecological capacity.

***What type of functional response?Predators switch to different prey in responseto fluctuations in prey density.

Page 24: Ecological footprints of some nations already exceed available ecological capacity.

Switching to alternative prey occurs only when preferred prey density falls to low level.

Page 25: Ecological footprints of some nations already exceed available ecological capacity.

Is this a numerical or functional response of wolves to moose?

Figure 11

Page 26: Ecological footprints of some nations already exceed available ecological capacity.

Why didn’t top-down control limit spruce budworm devastation?

Page 27: Ecological footprints of some nations already exceed available ecological capacity.

***Is there a functional response? Numerical response? What is the total response of warblers to spruce budworm abundance? Does the warbler control its prey?

Figure 12A B C

Page 28: Ecological footprints of some nations already exceed available ecological capacity.

Population cycles synchronized among species in a region. Periodic cycles with peaks separated by same number of years.

Figure 13

Page 29: Ecological footprints of some nations already exceed available ecological capacity.

Cycles have damped out with warmer temperatures.

Page 30: Ecological footprints of some nations already exceed available ecological capacity.

Other species may vary in their response to changes in the environment --> asynchronized cycles.

Figure 14

Page 31: Ecological footprints of some nations already exceed available ecological capacity.

Predator and prey populations often increase and decrease in synchronized cycles. Which group lags the other?

Page 32: Ecological footprints of some nations already exceed available ecological capacity.

• Predators eat prey--->reduce prey numbers• Predators go hungry---> their numbers drop• Few prey do better--->prey numbers rise• Predators have more food---> their numbers rise.

• Do prey control predators or vice versa?• What other factor could explain prey cycles?

Page 33: Ecological footprints of some nations already exceed available ecological capacity.

Question: What factors control the hare-lynx population cycle?

• Hypothesis: Predation, food availability to prey, or a combination of those two factors controls the cycle.

• Null Hypothesis: They do NOT control the cycle.

• Experimental Design??• Prediction: Hare populations in at least one

type of manipulated plot will be higher than mean population in control plots.

• Prediction of null H: Hare populations will be the same in all of the plots. Figure 16

Page 34: Ecological footprints of some nations already exceed available ecological capacity.

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

ControlsFence;no lynx

Extra food

for hares Both

Page 35: Ecological footprints of some nations already exceed available ecological capacity.

• What is conclusion?

• Do predation, food, or a combination of both factors control the hare-lynx cycle?

QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Figure 17

Page 36: Ecological footprints of some nations already exceed available ecological capacity.

The lynx-hare story update…alternative explanations.

Page 37: Ecological footprints of some nations already exceed available ecological capacity.

Fluctuations in population density in a host-parasitoid system in the lab.

Page 38: Ecological footprints of some nations already exceed available ecological capacity.

How stabilize predator-prey interactions?

No sediment

Sediment(hiding places)

Immigration

Figure 19

Page 39: Ecological footprints of some nations already exceed available ecological capacity.

Huffaker’s experiment to get predator-preypopulations to persist without immigration.

Page 40: Ecological footprints of some nations already exceed available ecological capacity.

1) Oranges clumped---> what happened to cycle?

Figure 20

Page 41: Ecological footprints of some nations already exceed available ecological capacity.

2) Oranges dispersed randomly--->what happened to cycles? Why?

3) Spatial heterogeneity --->stable cycles.

Figure 21


Recommended