+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Economic Analysis

Economic Analysis

Date post: 25-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: ardita-buzhala
View: 11 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Economic Analysis
6
DPR for Chhattisgarh State Road Sector Development Project Package - A [Loan -2, Phase -3 Asian Development Bank] Economic Analysis 10.0 ECONOMIC ANALYSIS 10.1 Introduction This chapter discusses the general principles of cost benefit analysis (CBA) and outlines the major costs and benefits considered for the economic appraisal of the project road. It discusses the adjustments needed to convert the financial costs into economic costs. Economic evaluation of a project attempts to take into account all the costs and benefits to the society irrespective of who pay the costs and who receives the benefits. In the case of a road project, the benefits accrue mainly to the road users (society in general) in the form of vehicle operating cost savings and time savings. The costs are borne by the developer (government/ private operator). 10.2 Economic Costs The cost of implementing a project to society is not necessarily the same as the costs in the market place. In terms of economic costs, such market or financial costs are devoid of any tax components and market imperfections. Thus, in the cost benefit analysis of an economic appraisal, financial costs have to be adjusted to derive the economic costs. In a project of the current nature many items are used in the construction with tax components known for certain items and not for others. It is a general practice to adjust the financial costs of items with unknown tax components by a standard conversion factor (SCF). A SCF of 0.9 is assumed for this study. 10.3 Homogenous Sections The cost of improving the existing roads and development along the project corridor and the resultant benefits in terms of vehicle operating costs differ between various sections of the project road. This variation is primarily due to the condition of the pavement of the particular section and the quantum of heavy vehicles moving on it. Thus, the results of investigation of pavement strength and traffic levels on various sections were combined and the project road has been delineated in to homogenous sections as presented in Table 10.1. Table 10.1: Homogenous Sections for Economic Analysis Scott Wilson 12 - 1 October 2010
Transcript
Page 1: Economic Analysis

DPR for Chhattisgarh State Road Sector Development Project Package - A [Loan -2, Phase -3 Asian Development Bank] Economic Analysis

10.0 ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

10.1 Introduction

This chapter discusses the general principles of cost benefit analysis (CBA) and outlines the major costs and benefits considered for the economic appraisal of the project road. It discusses the adjustments needed to convert the financial costs into economic costs.

Economic evaluation of a project attempts to take into account all the costs and benefits to the society irrespective of who pay the costs and who receives the benefits. In the case of a road project, the benefits accrue mainly to the road users (society in general) in the form of vehicle operating cost savings and time savings. The costs are borne by the developer (government/ private operator).

10.2 Economic Costs

The cost of implementing a project to society is not necessarily the same as the costs in the market place. In terms of economic costs, such market or financial costs are devoid of any tax components and market imperfections. Thus, in the cost benefit analysis of an economic appraisal, financial costs have to be adjusted to derive the economic costs. In a project of the current nature many items are used in the construction with tax components known for certain items and not for others. It is a general practice to adjust the financial costs of items with unknown tax components by a standard conversion factor (SCF). A SCF of 0.9 is assumed for this study.

10.3 Homogenous Sections

The cost of improving the existing roads and development along the project corridor and the resultant benefits in terms of vehicle operating costs differ between various sections of the project road. This variation is primarily due to the condition of the pavement of the particular section and the quantum of heavy vehicles moving on it. Thus, the results of investigation of pavement strength and traffic levels on various sections were combined and the project road has been delineated in to homogenous sections as presented in Table 10.1.

Table 10.1: Homogenous Sections for Economic Analysis

Sec. No. Section as per Existing Chainage Length (Km)Name Start Chainage

(Km)End Chainage (Km)

HS-01 Raipur-Kharora 11+000 40+000 29.00HS-02 Kharora-Balodabazar 40+000 84+000 44.00

10.4 Project Costs

The project costs such as construction; routine, recurrent and periodic maintenance; land acquisition; environmental mitigation and rehabilitation etc. have been discussed in detail in Chapter – 09: Cost Estimates. The SCF stated earlier was applied to these costs during the cost benefit analysis.

The costs in general include the costs of improvement of the existing Intermediate and 2-lane to a 2-Lane with 1.5m earthen shoulder on either side facility.

Scott Wilson 12 - 1 October 2010

Page 2: Economic Analysis

DPR for Chhattisgarh State Road Sector Development Project Package - A [Loan -2, Phase -3 Asian Development Bank] Economic Analysis

10.5 Project Sections

Improvement options considered for each of the homogenous sections are as shown in Table 10.2 and Figure 10.1.

Table 10.2: Project Improvement Sections

S.No.

SectionExisting Section

Existing Average

Carriageway Width

Proposed Improvement

Length (Km)

Improvement Proposal

1Raipur-Kharora

HS-01 7.0Overlay and

Rehabilitation29.00

Improvement on the Existing

Alignment

2Kharora-

BalodabazarHS-02 5.5

2-Lane with 1.5 m Earthen shoulder

44.00Improvement

on the Existing Alignment

Figure 10.1: Project Improvement Sections

10.6 Cost-Benefit Analysis Method

This analysis was carried out using the HDM-4 software. This appraisal included sensitivity analysis to assess the impact of increased costs of construction and decreased benefits. The analysis also considered the value of savings in travel time.

Economic benefits of the project were estimated in terms of savings in VOC and savings in travel time for passenger and goods vehicles. The estimates of VOCs and time costs of each vehicle type in with and without project scenario have been made using HDM-4.

Scott Wilson 12 - 2 October 2010

Page 3: Economic Analysis

DPR for Chhattisgarh State Road Sector Development Project Package - A [Loan -2, Phase -3 Asian Development Bank] Economic Analysis

The HDM-4 software comprises a set of models for estimating various values which effect the feasibility of road project, such as vehicle operating costs, travel time costs of passengers and commodities in transit, and the effect of maintenance standards and improvement standards on road condition and the resultant impact on VOCs etc. Some salient input parameters, which were considered for this project, are presented hereinafter.

Analysis Period : 20 years (2011-2030)

Construction Period : 24 months

Discount Rate : 12%

Comparable Alternatives : Alt-0 (Base)-Routine Maint. And Overlay Alt-X0 (For HS-01) –Rehabilitation and OverlayAlt-X1 (For HS-02)-Improvement for widening to 7m

Routine Maintenance : Scheduled (Every Year)

Periodic Maintenance - Overlay : Scheduled (Every 5th Year)

Salvage Value : 25%

The calibration factors for some parameters of HDM-4 software used for this analysis are as indicated by ADB for some of the national highway projects undertaken in the recent past. These are presented hereinafter:

Parameter Initiation Progression

Cracking 1.10 1.00Raveling 0.40 0.45Pot-holing 1.00Rut depth 1.25Edge repair drainage coefficient 1.00Edge break coefficient 1.00Road side friction 0.95Effect of speeds 1.00

10.7 Cost-Benefit Analysis Results

The economic viability of the considered options for improving the traffic facility on the project corridor have been evaluated in terms of Economic Internal Rate of Return (EIRR) and Net Present Value (NPV) of the project benefits and the ratio NPV/Cost. The benefits of the project were estimated in terms of VOC savings and monetary value of savings in travel time. The economic returns of each section with normal scenario and with drop in traffic growth rates by 50% are presented in Table 10.3 and Table 10.4 respectively.

Table 10.3: Economic Returns of each Section and Project for flexible pavement option with normal Scenario

Sec. Description VOC + Time VOCEIRR(%)

NPV(Rs.

Millions)

NPV/C EIRR(%)

NPV(Rs.

millions)

NPV/C

HS-01 Raipur-Kharora 86.71 3863.50 10.25 70.41 2801.15 7.58

Scott Wilson 12 - 3 October 2010

Page 4: Economic Analysis

DPR for Chhattisgarh State Road Sector Development Project Package - A [Loan -2, Phase -3 Asian Development Bank] Economic Analysis

Sec. Description VOC + Time VOCEIRR(%)

NPV(Rs.

Millions)

NPV/C EIRR(%)

NPV(Rs.

millions)

NPV/C

HS-02 Kharora-Balodabazar 82.84 5470.77 10.46 64.95 3783.88 7.09Project 84.41 9334.27 10.33 67.16 6585.03 7.29

Table 10.4: Economic Returns of each Section and Project for flexible pavement Option with drop in traffic growth rates by 50%

Sec. Description VOC + Time VOCEIRR(%)

NPV(Rs.

Millions)

NPV/C EIRR(%)

NPV(Rs.

millions)

NPV/C

HS-01 Raipur-Kharora 78.44 2943.67 8.03 63.00 2111.26 5.76HS-02 Kharora-Balodabazar 75.04 4077.91 7.69 58.17 2790.30 5.26

Project 76.42 7021.58 7.83 60.14 4901.56 5.47

10.8 Sensitivity Analysis

Sensitivity analysis of economic returns of the project was carried out. The sensitivity scenarios considered in this analysis are as presented here in after.

Base Costs and Base BenefitsBase Costs plus 20% and Base BenefitsBase Costs and Base Benefits minus 20%Base Costs plus 20% and Base Benefits minus 20%

The results of this analysis are presented in Table 10.4. The results indicate that the project EIRR values, across sections, in the worst case of simultaneous increase in costs and decrease in benefits varies between 49 and 54 percent considering VOC savings alone and varies between 63and 67 percent including value of travel time savings. The bank (RBI - Reserve Bank of India) rate is varying between 6 and 11 percent in the recent past and is the lower limit for a project to be economically viable. Hence the overall project can be considered to be viable in economic terms as the EIRR values of the project in the worst case is more than 15 percent. The comparative cost streams (output of HDM-4) of the Base Alternative (Alt-0) with that of the proposed improvement options are presented in Annexure 10.1.

Table 10.4: Sensitivity of Economic Returns for flexible pavement option with normal scenario

SectionVOC+Time (%) VOC (%)

Base C+20% B-20%C+20%B-20%

Base C+20% B-20%C+20%B-20%

HS-01 86.71 77.01 74.99 66.52 70.41 62.54 60.90 54.01HS-02 82.84 73.45 71.49 63.32 64.95 57.63 56.10 49.71Project 84.41 74.89 72.90 64.61 67.16 59.62 58.04 51.45

Note: C-Cost, B-Benefit

Scott Wilson 12 - 4 October 2010


Recommended