Date post: | 08-Jan-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | janice-clark |
View: | 218 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Economic Analysis of Education: Public-Private
Roles E. Jimenez
March 2008
Analyzing public-private interactions: Outline
• A Quiz on the functions of government: financing, providing and regulating
• Financing education – analyzing issues and options
• Providing and regulating education – analyzing issues and options
Q1. The figure below shows:a) Private education expenditure as % of total b) Public education expenditure as % of total
0% 50% 100%S. AfricaMalaysia
BoliviaFranceUK
VenezuelaGhanaUSA
Indon.German.
PeruUgandaSierra LeoneS. Korea
Netherlands
Q2. The figure below shows (secondary)a) Private education enrollment as % of total b) Public education enrollment as % of total
0% 50% 100%
MexicoUSANigerCyprus
KuwaitFrance
AustraliaKorea Chile
Belgium
NetherlandsMauritius
Options for interventionDegree of public financing
100%
0% 100%Degree of public provision
Unsubsidized privatesector (Philippine, tertiary level)
Public schools with no cost recovery (many)
Options for interventionDegree of public financing
100%
0% 100%Degree of public provision
Unsubsidized privatesector (Philippine, tertiary level)
Voucher supportedschools; Regulatedprivate schools (Netherlands, Belgium)
Public schools with no cost recovery (many)
Public facilitieswith cost recovery(US universities)
What lessons?
• Public intervention through finance is different from provision
• It’s hard to generalize where the private sector may be large.
• If there is a private sector, then the gov’t has an important regulatory role.
• Finance, provision and regulation must be set to meet economic efficiency and equity goals
Analyzing public-private interactions: Outline
• Functions of government: financing, providing and regulating
• Financing education – analyzing issues and options
• Providing and regulating education – analyzing issues and options
Market failures in education
Characteristic• Market Failures
– Externalities• Productivity• Nation-bldg,
community
Applies to?
– Primary education: the effects of numeracy and literacy
Example of externality effects: Effect on earnings of an illiterate of having a literate
member in the household (%) in Pakistan, 1998-99
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Urban Source: Pakistan Poverty Assessment, 2001 World Bank
Example of externality effects:Effects on health
1 Child mortality by educational attainment of the mother
0 1 0 0 2 0 0 3 0 0
D e a t h s p e r 1 ,0 0 0 liv e bir t h s
Ma li 1 9 9 5 - 9 6
B o liv ia 1 9 9 4
Ug a n d a 1 9 9 5
Ne p a l 1 9 9 6
Y e me n 1 9 9 1 -9 2
Mo r o c c o 1 9 9 2
N o educatio nP rimary o nly
S eco nd ary o r hig her
Ph illip in e s 1 9 9 3
Note: Mortality data are for children under five. Source: DHS Final Reports, various years.
Child mortality falls as mothers learn.
Market failures in education
Characteristic• Market Failures
– Externalities• Productivity• Nation-bldg,
community
Applies to?
– Primary education: the effects of numeracy and literacy
-- Research
Market failures in education
Characteristic• Market Failures
– Externalities• Productivity• Nation-bldg,
community– Capital Mkt
Failures• Redistribution
Higher education
Richest 20 percent
0 2 4 6 8 10
Egypt 1995-96
Philippines 1998
India 1992-93
Bolivia 1997
Kenya 1998
Brazil 1996
Mozambique1997
Mali1995-96
Grade
Median grade attained by 15-19 year olds:
Inequalities in education outcomesInequalities in education outcomes
0 2 4 6 8 10
Egypt 1995-96
Philippines 1998
India 1992-93
Bolivia 1997
Kenya 1998
Brazil 1996
Mozambique1997
Mali1995-96
Grade
Median grade attained by 15-19 year olds:
Inequalities in education outcomesInequalities in education outcomes
Poorest 40 percent
Proportion of public subsidy received by poorest quintile
00.050.1
0.150.2
0.250.3
0.350.4
0.45
Colomb Kenya Ghana Indones Malaysia
PrimarySecondaryTertiary
Colombia: 92; Kenya: 92/3; Ghana 91/2; Indonesia, Malaysia 89
Analyzing public finance: What is the appropriate public share in
exp?Because public budgets are
constrained, priorities must be set – does spending correct for market failure?– Basic: strong efficiency & equity– Higher: strong efficiency in some
areas but poor equity– Tech/Voc: weak efficiency & equity
Analyzing public-private interactions:
Outline• Functions of government:
financing, providing and regulating• Financing education – analyzing
issues and options • Providing and regulating
education – analyzing issues and options
Analyzing public-private provision
• Given that public chooses to finance, should it provide?– Scale economies– Control
Analyzing public-private provision
• Given that public chooses to finance, should it provide?– Scale economies– Control
• Why might it finance and not provide?
Private schools deliver better education at lower cost
00.20.40.60.8
11.21.4
Colombia Dom Rep Phil Tanzania
CostAchievement
Ratio of private to public cost and achievement
Analyzing public-private provision
• Given that public chooses to finance, should it provide?– Scale economies– Control
• Why might it finance and not provide?– Lower unit costs: stimulate competition,
increase accountability, reward perform.
Contracting with communities:
El Salvador• School governance to community
associations: hire/fire teach, adm gov funds
• Members elected from community• Legally responsible for operations
El Salvador Achievement Results
0.45
2.17
-0.77
0.74
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
Math Language
WithoutWith
Without: w/o school input and community participation variables; * Significant at 5%Values are in terms of Raw Scores (Averages are 4 and 2)
*
Analyzing public-private provision
• Given that public chooses to finance, should it provide?– Scale economies– Control
• Why might it finance and not provide?– Lower unit costs: stimulate competition,
increase accountability, reward perform.– Concern: equity
Enrollment in Slums in Lahore• Data: 1,000 HHs in 26 slum areas
• % of children in HHs living on less than $1/day: 55%
0102030405060708090
Bot14%
Next41%
Top 5% All
No schoolPrivatePublic
Percent of Children Enrolled in Lahore by Income Group, School type
Alderman, Orzem and Paterno, “School Quality, Cost and Public/Private School Choice of Low Income HHs in PakistanWP 2, Impact Evaluation of Education Reforms, DECRG, World Bank 1996
Analyzing public-private provision
• Given that public chooses to finance, should it provide?– Scale economies– Control
• Why might it finance and not provide?– Lower unit costs– Problem may be demand, not supply side
FSSAP Bangladesh• Criteria:
– Attendance in school– Passing grade– Unmarried
• Girls to receive scholarship deposited to account set up in her name
• School to receive support based on # of girls
Pakistan: Encouraging private schools to meet social goals
• Urban Girls’ Fellowship Program in Quetta: is establishing private schools in poor neighborhood cost-effective?
• Subsidies paid directly to schools for 3 years:– Initial: Rs.100 ($3)/mo/girl to limit of Rs10K
plus Rs.200/girl– Reduced in 2nd and 3rd years; then zero. – Unsubsidized boys to be no more than 1/2
of enrollment• Randomized selection of neighborhoods
Pakistan: Encouraging private schools to meet social goals
0
20
40
60
80
Control Girls Program Girls
Pre-Prog 1995 1996
Pakistan: Encouraging private schools to meet social goals
0
20
40
60
80
Control Boys Program Boys
Pre-Prog 1995 1996
0
20
40
60
80
Control Girls Program Girls
Pre-Prog 1995 1996
Source: J. Kim, H. Alderman and P. Orazem, 1998
Analyzing public-private interactions:
Outline• Functions of government:
financing, providing and regulating• Financing education – analyzing
issues and options • Providing and regulating education
– analyzing issues and options: analyze NET impacts
Private-Public Interactions: Estimating NET Impacts
What happens to quantity when the public sector expands?
• Build more schools:– attract more students who didn’t go to
school– attract more students from private schools
• Increase subsidies:– attract more students into schools– cause private spending to decline.
Philippines: Effect of Enrolling 10 more students in public secondary schools
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
Priv EnrlTot Enrl
Source: E. Jimenez and Y. Sawada, forthcoming, “Public for private: the relationship between public and private enrollment in thePhilippines,” Economics of Education Review.
MessagesMessages• Public finance and provision are distinct• Investigate the market for education
– Market failures are not the same for all levels
– Public investment can affect overall market
• Alternative delivery mechanisms can work
Implications for economic analysis
• Define the counterfactual • Measure externalities or other
market failures• Measure distributional effects These are not easy. In addition
must resolve• Attribution• Measurement of diverse outcomes