Date post: | 02-Jun-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | ionut-sandu |
View: | 221 times |
Download: | 0 times |
of 106
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
1/106
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF
PUBLIC DECISIONSEconomics of the Public Sector
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
2/106
Course outline
1. Introduction to Public Sector Economics
2. The system of public economics
3. The state, actor of public economy
4. The Public Sectorstructure, reform5. The market failure
6. Labour market
7. Competition
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
3/106
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
4/106
Why does PS economics interest us? (1)
Public economics is a branch of economics that aims at
analysing public decisions in economic terms (Matei
2003)
Reason: the need for organising the public activities
Regulation
Price setting
Supply of public goods and services
Publicrevenues
Publicexpenditures
- Taxes andtariffs/duties
- Income from
capital
- Income from
states privategoods
- Borrowing
- Transfers- Expenditures
with public
policies
- Capital
expenses
- Interest
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
5/106
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
6/106
What is our aim? (1)
Introduce aspects of public economics, economic toolsand so on
- concepts, notions
Substantiate these elements through theoriesin the fieldof public economics
Strengthen your knowledge of public economics with
special reference to the European states economy,American or Asian economy if relevant to the subjectupon debatepublic intervention, market failure and soon.
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
7/106
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
8/106
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
9/106
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
10/106
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
11/106
Triple view of public economy
Facts, phenomenaand economic
processes
Publicadministrations and
enterprises (orprivately heldenterprisesengaged in theproduction of publicgoods or services)
Sciencetheeconomic analysis
of public decisions(ECONOMICS)
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
12/106
The object of public actions
Regulation
Price setting
(through taxes, duties,subsidies)
Production of public goodsand services
Consequences Publicrevenues
Publicexpenditures
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
13/106
The public economics principle Human needs are always greater
than the available resources.
Resources = factors of production(land La, labour L and capital K). La (Land) = natural resources.
L (Labour) = physical and mentalcapacity of workers to produce goods
and services. K (Capital) = goods that do not directly
satisfy human needs: factories,machineries, equipment used toproduce other goods.
Is money considered capital ineconomics ?
The concerns of the public decision-maker:
What is to be produced?
How is to be produced?
For whom is it to be produced?
How are these decisions made?
Scarcity
Choice
Needs
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
14/106
What is to be produced?
Production possibilityfrontier
Resource allocation inbetween the two
industries (public goods,
private goods)
Efficient allocation: A, B
A B public goods private goods
Inefficient allocation: C Infeasible allocation: D
Public
goods
Private
goods
A
B
C
D
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
15/106
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
16/106
For who is to be produced? How are these decision made?
The distribution problem is
influenced by: Fiscal policy;
Social policy;
Provided public goods (satisfy the needsof certain groups).
Free rider issue(linking the paymentwith the benefits the tendency to
lie about the benefits)
Wagner Law(law of public activityincrease in the developed countriesthrough corelation with thenational income) an economicdevelopment pushes for more public
spending laissezfaire
Redistribution (matching the needsfor social aid to the financingobtained through taxes)
Collectively
David Hume - tragedy of the
commons
Stages of collective (public) decision:
Knowing the public sector activities
and organization:
Financing method;
Expenditures and taxes (on a
central and local level);
Anticipating the consequences:
The effects of a tax on return
(price increase, wage cut);
Increasing the retirement age;
Assessing the alternatives;
The influence of the political factor.
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
17/106
Utility and preference
Let us rememberUtilityreal/assumed capacity of a good to satisfy a need.Economic utility = satisfaction felt by an individual after consuming a
good.
Marginal utility = the value of the last consumed quantity of a good; thegain in satisfaction after consuming an additional quantity from an
economic good.Indifference curve (isoutility) = combinations of goods from which the
consumer hopes to receive the same level of satisfaction.
Why does it interest us?
In the analysis of public economythe four pillars:
Optimum;
Public goods;
Collective choices;
Justice.
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
18/106
Optimum
A balanced situation preferred by everyone (equilibrium);
Is reached by the presence of other individuals producing
spillovers (externalities) positive or negative (beneficial or
harmful); The value of an old house in a new neighborhood;
Pollution;
E.g. (Stiglitz, 2010) situations in which a trade involves certain costs
and benefits for third parties (non-participants).
Pareto Optimumno individual can be made better offwithout someone being made worse off efficient resourceallocation
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
19/106
Public goods
Some goods will either not be supplied by the market or, ifsupplied, will be supplied in insufficient quantity.
Pure public goods:
It costs nothing for an additional individual to enjoy their benefits;
It is difficult or impossible to exclude individuals from the enjoyment of
a pure public good.
As more individuals join the group consuming the public
good its quality could decrease. The optimum size of a
groups consuming a certain good is analyzed by the theory
of clubsBuchanan, 1965.
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
20/106
Collective choicesExample of collective decision-makingthe voting paradox (Marquis de Condorcet)
Voting preferences
As preferences Bs preferences Cs preferences
First choice Shrek Twitty Tom
Second choice Twitty Tom Shrek
Third choice Tom Shrek Twitty
2:1
2:1
tranzitivity ?
NO ! 2:1
The majority vote can only
compare two preferences and
cannot decide the order of all
preferences!
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
21/106
Justice
Socially acceptable objective of the Government: Protecting life and property;
Economic efficiency(obtaining the best result with limited resources);
Reaching a standard of justice (equity) (income distributionequalvs. differentiated);
Economic growth;
Economic stability.
Tradeoff between equity and efficiency
leaky bucket
Economic policyfulfilling the criteria of economic efficiency; Social policyaims at fair income distribution.
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
22/106
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
23/106
L'tat c'est moi!
Improving the utility of one individual must not diminishthe utility of another individual.
The individuals incapacity to cooperate market failure
Public economyactors: Manorganized in communities (or any other organizations)
Statethrough:
Power of coercionmonopoly on:
Law making;
National defense; Management of military reserves during war.
Accountabilitylimited power through nations will (Constitution, laws);
Motivationpublic interest.
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
24/106
How much does the state matter?Public expenditures (% GDP)
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
25/106
States functions Allocative function
Government intervention in the allocative
function of the market to correct its negative effects;
Distribution functionensuring equity, social justice on thedistribution of income and wealth;
Stability functionmitigate market failures in the national economyas inflation, unemployment, stagnating economic growth, balance of
payments imbalances;
Regulatory functionmaintenance of individual behavior withinlimits imposed by society and contract discipline (through a functioning
legal system).
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
26/106
Allocative function
Property right Belongs to an individual (private property)the right to exclude other
individuals from the benefits provided by a certain good;
Belongs to more individuals (common property)the right of a groupof individuals to benefit without boundaries from the object of that
property (see tragedy of the commons andfree rider); The use of common property right:
Umg=Price
It does not involve scarce resources
Otherwise:
Excessive use (like in the case of excess hunting and fishing);
Premature exhaustion of natural resources;
Congestion (in the case ofpositional goods goods having an insufficient supplyand their production cannot be easily increase).
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
27/106
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
28/106
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
29/106
Regulatory function (1)
Regulating the producers and consumers decisions so toreduce:
Tendencies towards monopoly;
Negative externalities.
Why the State and not another actor?
There are large costs (for the individual consumers) of obtaining and
interpreting information about product safety;
The individuals may not be able to protect themselves because they
do not have the resources at their disposal to establish minimum
standards and quality control. Regularization limits the discretionary behavior and freedom
of individuals by imposing rules.
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
30/106
Regulatory function (2)
Regulations are based on legal norms aimed at: Protecting the consumer against fraud,
Preventing damage to consumer health,
Control the design of goods so as to ensure their safe operation,
Ensure harmless conditions of employment,
Control the commercial systems, biological research etc.
The State also regulates:
Money supply;
Prices of utilities and nationalized industries;
Many of the allocative decisions in the economy (through price andincome policies).
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
31/106
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
32/106
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
33/106
Stability function (1)
When does it intervene? In case of macroeconomic imbalances (inflation, unemployment,economic downturn, deficits of the trade balance and balance ofpayments etc.)
To reach the macroeconomic targets:
Economic growth Job securityreducing unemployment;
Price stabilityinflation control;
External balancebalance of payments.
How?
Through monetary and fiscal policy instruments used to restorebalance
By coordinating the economic decisions of different groups ofeconomic actors from the private sector
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
34/106
Stability function (2)
Economic growth global process referring to an upward evolution of certain aggregate
economic measures, over a period of time, on a national or
international level, and producing favorable effects both economically
and socially.
an element of continuity beyond the particular macroeconomic policiesimplemented by one government or another.
takes place long term, governments are often faced with cyclicity,
requiring reformulationof the objectives of economic growth:
Establishing a social, economic and institutional environment favorable to
economic growth Ensuring balance for an economic growth path (Keynes)
Targeting economic recovery (growth of real national income vs. Growth of
potential national income)limit economic cycle oscillation for ensuringsustainable and balanced economic growth
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
35/106
Stability function (3)
Jobs security Utopia heavily promoted during the communist command
economic system
Associated with the right to work
Open access to the labor market institutional and economic environment to stimulate the
development of economic initiative
Confusion!
States responsibility to ensuring the general conditions for everyindividual to work (with the appropriate exceptions)
States duty to secure jobs for all those who want to work oversizing the public sector developing the PS in accordance with
different criteria, noteconomic efficiency
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
36/106
Stability function (4)
Reformulating theobjective:
Much more productive
Full use of production factors (L
included) means:
Their efficient use (optimum use)
by every economic agent
NOTusing all factors of production
available at a time
unemployment rate 0
(an unemployment rate lower than the
natural rate can cause short circuits
on the labor market)
A difference must be made interms of types of unemployment
Securing jobs
Reduce
unemployment
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
37/106
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
38/106
Stability function (6)
Price stabilityAssociated with the anti-inflationary policies The dilemma of macroeconomic policiesreducing unemployment
or reducing inflation
The achievement of a high degree of pr ice stabi l i ty; this will be
apparent from a rate of inf lat ion which is close to that of, at most,the three best performing Member States in terms of price stability(one of the convergence criteria)
Where is Romania standing?
Inflation/deflation/disinflation?
What is the supervising body?
Through what tools?
Also contributes to regulating competitiontendency toartificially increase prices for monopoly and oligopoly
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
39/106
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
40/106
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
41/106
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
42/106
How do we define the public sector in economic terms?
3. Time
Short term
State budget Public revenues and
expenditures = Correlating
the budget with the publicsector size
Shows the balance/imbalance Budget surplus (can show a
false profitability, inflationarysituations)
Budget deficit (commonsituation)
Long term The public sector itself
Marginal social benefit (MSB) =marginal revenue of the publicsector
Marginal social costul (MSC) =cost of administering the publicsector
MSB = MSC optimum size ofthe public sector
MSB > MSCpublic sector isefficient, in terms of profitability
MSB < MSCoversizing thepublic sector, low publicservice efficiency
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
43/106
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
44/106
How do we define the public sector in economic terms?
5. In terms of other criteria
Negative versus positive economic policy Negativepromotes competition, anti-monopoly, neutrality in thenational economic space
Positivedirect state involvement, supporting imports and exports,measures favoring the economic
Nationalization versus privatization Common objectives :
Improving resource allocation;
Improving pricing and investment policies;
Distinct objectives: Nationalizationstrengthening the public sector and national strategies,
control of natural resources;
Privatizationimprove efficiency and reduce costs, reduce the needs ofbudget financing/ public borrowing.
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
45/106
Reforming the public sector (1) What is it? Politic activity
Why do we need it? Improving efficiency in public resource allocation;
Greater justice in income distribution.
What does it depend upon?
Technology; Economic and political circumstances.
What are the reform reasons? Institutional reform;
Reducing expenditures, costs savings
Who influences the reform? Decentralization institutional change (political and administrative);
Privatization institutional change (economic);
Private sectorderegulation (to intensify competition).
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
46/106
Reforming the public sector(2)Results in the public sector
Expansion/reduction ofpublic sector
Decentralization
Privatization
Deregulation
Exemples Decentralization
Expansion of public services
Reducing expenditures through a
better allocation
Privatization Expansion after changing the state-
owned company into a joint stock
company (still state-owned)
Reducing PS by transferring social
assistance to the private sector
Deregulation
Expansion due to cost coverage
(American financial system)
Reducing PS through careful
deregulation
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
47/106
Reforming the public sector (3)Micro-focused
Focused on single programs;
Technical and administrative
nature.
Macro-focused Focused on the general
dimension of PS;
Political nature.
Both strategies aim at:
Either improving results through:
Introducing new programs; Technologies; Institutions.
Or cost savings.
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
48/106
Reforming the public sector (4) Privatizationcan cover:
Sales of public property;
Long-term lease of publicinfrastructure, privateenterprises;
Use of decision-makingprocesses like contracting andbidding (procurement);
Replacement authority as amechanism of coordination withmarket mechanisms;
Insertion of market incentives inthe reward system for the publicofficials.
Decentralization strategy
replaced:
Planning
Rigid budgets
Control
System ofrules
Supervising
Evaluation
Performancebudgets
Managementby objectives
Frameworklegislation
Discretion
Do these contribute to productivity and efficiency increase?
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
49/106
AnswerEfficiency
Can be stimulated by a local
administrative (decentralized)
system, but moving resources
(down) does not necessarily
improve efficiency (e.g. police andjustice)
Reduction policies are neutral in
relation to efficiency or inefficiency
in the PS
ProductivityAimed at through
privatization
Need for increased competition
on the supply side
Expanding opportunities for
selection on the demand side
Will these released resources be used for public sector
development?!
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
50/106
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
51/106
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
52/106
Structural analysis of sectors of activity
Existentcompetitorsin the field
Potentialcompetitors
Buyers
Substituteproducts
Suppliers
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
53/106
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
54/106
Idea The five forcesare the grounds for STRATEGY
development reflect the complexity of competitionin a sector
A greater intensity of competition is registered under perfect competition(free market entrance, existing players have no bargaining power withsuppliers and customers, and the rivalry is unlimited due to the presence of
a large number of identical products) Influence the profitabilityof a sector
Lower return if there is a better and cheaper substitute
Or if there is market rivalry
Do not consider factors that may influence short-term return - have
TACTICAL significance Fluctuations in the economic situation;
Shortages of raw materials;
Strikes;
Demand fluctuations, etc.
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
55/106
1. Threat of new entrants
Barriers to entry in a particular industry Economies of scale
Product differentiation
Financial needs
Costs of changing partner Access to distribution channels
Cost disadvantages independent of scale economies (know-how)
Existing reactions from the existing players
Price to prevent entry Characteristics of the barriers to entry (e.g. exclusive rights
to technology)
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
56/106
2. Intensity of rivalry between existent
actorsDepends on structural factors:
The presence of a large
number of actors or actors of
equal size
Slow sector development
pace
High storage or fixed costs
Lack of differentiation or
partner switching costs
High strategic stakes
High barriers to exit
Entrancebarriers
High
Low Low
stable
earnings
Low,risky
earnings
Large,
stableearnings
Large,
riskyearnings
Exit barriersLow High
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
57/106
3. Pressure from the substitute products
Perform a function identical to that of the product in question
Presents a dangerous cost-performance rate for the
products in a particular sector
Attitude towards substitute products takes the form of
collective action (Buy American)
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
58/106
4. Bargaining power of buyers
It is a focused group or buy a large quantity of theconcerned products
Products are standard or undifferentiated
The switching cost is reduced
The buyer has complete information
In case of upstream integration
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
59/106
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
60/106
Let us remember Public policy objectives impose:
The need for a market mix;
Technically possible (PPF); What and how is prod uced?
What individuals prefer (utility). Whom for?
Public intervention. How are these decision s taken?
The aims is to ensure a Pareto efficient economy (the idealsituation)
Namely a competitive economy
With an efficient resource allocation
What if the market fails?
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
61/106
Failure dissatisfaction
You always want what you do not have! The idea of an alternative way to organize the economy
(more advantageous for one who thinks of it)
Maybe you are right!
Markets (almost always) produce too much of something(pollution) and too little something(research);
a change that improves the situation of the rich without
affecting the poor is also Pareto efficient
The market intervention can happen both when markets
fail, and when the markets are efficient
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
62/106
Interventionthe beginning Property right
tragedy of the commons Property guarantee leads to:
Improvement (rent vs. property);
Increased saving and investment capacity.
Contracts guarantee
The problem of the overdue loans
Government intervenes to protect the citizens and
their rights
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
63/106
The intervention generated by market failure Six situations in which the markets are not Pareto efficient:
1. Failure of competition
2. Public goods
3. Externalities
4. Incomplete markets
5. Failure of information
6. Unemployment, inflation and imbalance
! Failure = the best possible result was NOT reached= inability of individuals to cooperate
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
64/106
1. Failure of competition
Pareto efficiency means perfect competition (idealsituation)
Number of companies is large enough to keep the
market priceunchanged
Otherwise:
Monopoly
Oligopoly
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
65/106
Reasons to limit competition Competitive advantage of large companies
When the production cost decreases with the production growth
(economies of scale)
Natural monopoly
A company produces cheaper together with other companies (utilitieswater, electricity etc.)
Large transport costs
Granting patents / licenses - they stimulate innovation, but
restrict competition
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
66/106
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
67/106
3. Externalities The actions of an individual / a firm raises costs for another
individual / companynegative externalities
Examples:
Pollution
Use of cars traffic jam more time spent while driving higher risk
(accidents)
Individuals do not cover the total cost of negative externalities they
generate they will get involved in more and more activities ofthis kind
People do not enjoy the full benefit of the positive externalities tempted to get involved less and less in such activities
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
68/106
4. Incomplete markets Not only pure public goods and services are those that
private markets fail to provide
A completemarket - providing all goods and services for
which the delivery cost is lower than the cost that individuals
are willing to pay
An incompletemarket - which fails to provide these goods
and services
Examples:
Failure of the insurance marketcovering all types of risk
Failure of real estate marketfirst house loan
Failure of students loans market
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
69/106
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
70/106
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
71/106
6. Unemployment, inflation and imbalance
The most common symptoms of market failure
Indicators of market failure but also of macroeconomic
imbalances
Influence the structure of fiscal policy
Heavily regulated on a regional level
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
72/106
Intervention on efficient markets Income distribution
Competitive markets Equal distribution
Government intervenes for income redistribution (social services)
Merit goods
Perfect information does not always lead to good decisions Smoking, seat belt
this type of intervention = paternalism(example: drug prohibition,compulsory social security) libertarianism
Paternalism (smoking ban) externality (example: the cost of smokingmay be covered by a fee)
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
73/106
The consequences of failure Changes made by state intervention are often unpredictable
Public policies aimed at ambiguous concepts such as
serving the public interest
Even the implementation of policies may be a failure (due to
complexity)
Government intervention is not free, is made through a
bureaucracy that is expensive to administer
Rent-seeking- lobbying to influence regulatory policies
(price distortion) which lowers social welfare (social costs)
(monopoly - transfer of wealth from buyer to producer)
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
74/106
Let us remember Market fails
Markets (almost
always) produce too
much of something
(pollution) and toolittle of something
(research);
Market is efficient
Marginal benefit =
Marginal cost = PriceQ
P
SD
E
QE
PE
0
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
75/106
Equilibrium (balance) on the labor market What do we take into
account?
Supply of labor
Demand of labor
Quantity of the good (labor)
Price of labor
Significance of the
imbalances
I over-wage II over-quantity
III under-wage
IV under-quantity
L
w
SLDLI
II
III
IV
LE
wE
0
E
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
76/106
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
77/106
Overuse of labor Can lead to overproduction of goods
Associated to an economic boom
USA 2006-2007unemployment rate < 5%
Oversizing the wages
The costs of labor (L) increase
Inflationary pressures occur
Solution = perfect competition (equality of wages) ?!
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
78/106
Change in wages Type of job
Education (undergrad studies, high school etc.)
Age
Experience at work (employee loyalty, encourage employment
stability and enterprise attachment) does not substitute theworkers competence
Gender and race (discriminations)
Market type (the case of the unionized labor markets)
Imperfections of the labor market
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
79/106
Competition on the labor market Monopsony on the labo r market
A single dominant buyer
The small companies will follow the wage policy of the large
companies
Particular case : coordinated oligopsony (agreement between the
companies on wage levels)
Effects:
Lower wage levels
Lower employment levels (in comparison to the perfectcompetition)
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
80/106
MonopsonyMonopsony with low wage
There is no negotiation on
wages, or differentiations in
these negotiations
The hiring conditions arepre-established (wage
included)
Labor: Accepts the monopsonys
terms,
Leaves the area to search for
work (uncommon, due to
rigidity)
Monopsony with differentiated wages
hiring is done in groups
wage negotiations take
place in groups or even
individually
Wages are set differently, so
that the wage costs do not
exceed the planned level
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
81/106
Monopoly on the labor market The union sets a wage salary (Wi)
The employment level will be QC,
pertaining to the labor demand
Real supply is largerQr
The area WiEcQcO represents
supplementary income of the
employees (Union members)
The area ABQrQc (limited by WE)
represents losses for the workers
who could still be hired if the labor
market would be competitive Pareto inefficiency
BA
Wi
Qc Qr
Ec Er
Q
W
S
DE
QE
WE
0
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
82/106
The monopolymonopsony confrontation Described by the negotiation power of the two sides
Creates powerful actors Unions
Employers associations
Trigger Large transaction costs on the labor market
Free rider behavior Illegal hiring
Hiring immigrants
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
83/106
State interventions on the labor market Setting a minimum wage
Discourages the use of illegal labor since taxes and contributions arecalculated as percentages relative to the entrance wage
Diminishes the unduly monopsony profits received through wagedifferentiation
Avoids a low employment level (artificially)
Establishing the minimum wageon the level of the wage of thatmarket balance, otherwise imbalances occur
The meaning of the minimum wagea policy tool to correct the
income distribution and to combat povertyAlternativeraise taxes on high wage earners (also affects
companies through the contributions quota)
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
84/106
Regulating the labor market
Limiting the excesses of the two main poles of the
labor market: union - monopoly
employersmonopsony
Involves two categories of actions: Trade unions and employers regulation in order to prevent excesses
and discrimination;
Direct involvement in the negotiations between unions and employers
as a mediator to ensure convergence to the labor markets optimum.
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
85/106
Regulations on employers Consider void the employment contracts subject to not belonging
to the union (yellow-dog contracts); Declare as core labor rights: the right to self-organization of labor
and the right to collective bargaining;
Prohibit employers to interfere in trade union activities and createobstacles to trade union organization;
Prohibit employers discrimination against union membershippertaining to hiring, firing and promotions;
Consider illegal to discriminate against any worker who has claimsagainst employers, or testify against him;
Require employers to properly negotiate with the unions, withoutresorting to pressure or threats;
Prohibit or limits wage discrimination based on gender, race,religious beliefs etc.
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
86/106
Regulations on unions
Address three main areas:
Union organization
Unfair union practices
Right to strike
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
87/106
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
88/106
Unfair union practices Pressure on employees to become union members
Judicial jams
Secondary boycotts (confrontation between unions)
Sympathy strikes
Discriminatory or excessive contributions
Refusal to negotiate with employers
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
89/106
The right to strike Free way of expressing the attitude of workers
about the working conditions
The aim should refer to the labor market
Otherwise, are prohibited: Political strikes
Religious strikes
solidarity or social groups strikes.
Are also prohibited : Strikes that can block the entire national economy and
may endanger public health,
or national security.
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
90/106
Let us remember Economysystem organized on markets:
Labor market
Market of goods and services
Monetary market
An efficient market = a competitive market
Perfect competition
Imperfect competition Non-optimal income distribution
State intervention
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
91/106
The Pareto inefficiency of monopoly Monopoly
Best known case of imperfect competition
Lack of competition on one goods market
The supplier has discretionary powers on settingthe operating conditions of a goods market
Monopolistic competition Who is competing against monopoly?
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
92/106
Who is competing against monopoly? With the companies that produce substitutable goods in
relation to the good self-produced.
With any other company the limited nature of short-termincome.
Considering short-term consumer income constant, it results that any
increase in consumption of a good will lead to a reduction in
consumption of another good, regardless of the relationship of
substitutability or complementarity.
Advantages of monopoly will attract other supplier/
manufacturers.
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
93/106
Monopolys strategies
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
94/106
Legend (1) Monopoly faces the market demand demand curve
around the gates of the company will be identical with thoseof market demand.
The optimal level of monopoly output (Q*) is set in relation tothe intersection of marginal revenue with marginal cost curve(Vm < VM)
The price corresponding to this level of supply is P*, butmarket demand is at a higher marginal income PC> P*
Monopoly can set the supply at its discretion (the onlysupplier)
Usually the monopolistic firm restricts the supply to get ahigher sales price (the more the supply curve will be to theleft, the higher the price will get)
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
95/106
Legend (2) The monopoly obtains superprofit (S), as the difference
between the profit pertaining to the intersection between thedemand curve and the supply curve (PC) and optimizing
price (P*)
Pareto optimum? No.
Obtaining superprofit is in the detriment of consumers, meaning thatthe Q* solution is not Pareto optimum
The prices are higher than the level pertaining to profit maximization
(P*)
Are there favorable conditions for monopoly? When it doesnot worsen the welfare of others
The case of the technological monopolyimproving technologicalperformance can be found in welfare improvements (R & D)
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
96/106
The Pareto inefficiency of oligopoly
Kinked (broken)
demand curve
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
97/106
Legend (1) Initial situation (Q0, P0).
Temptationprice control.
The oligopolistic firm has the following alternatives: If it wants to increase the price, the demand will suddenly turn elastic because
its product that became more expensive will be substituted by powerful
products of other firms from the oligopoly that have kept the price unchanged
losses for the supplier.
If it intends to reduce the price, the demand will turn inelastic, because at least
one other firm from the oligopoly will do the same, and the sales surplus willbe split between firms that reduce price losses for the supplier.
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
98/106
Legend (2) The marginal income Vm in the case of the imperfect
competition is below average income (of the marketdemand) the marginal revenue curve of the oligopolisticfirm will be discontinuous
Point Nmarginal revenue curve break (slope changes inthe firm's demand curve)
The second part of the marginal revenue curve is negative
(which measures the change in total revenue of thecompany to lower prices, unlike the first part which describesthe change in revenue from an increase in price)
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
99/106
Solutionnegotiation
Cooperationbetweenfirms in the oligopoly
avoids the kinked curve
and the firm gains
because the income
earned due to price
increase is larger than
the income lost due to
sales quantity drop
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
100/106
Methods of coordination in the oligopoly
Trustfirms are horizontally integrated through joint assets monopoly
Cartelfirms keep their autonomy (e.g. OPEC)
Coordination may be based on agreements negotiated bythe participants
These agreements provide for:
commodity prices,
local markets,
Supply quotas assigned to each participant.
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
101/106
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
102/106
Coordination difficulties in the oligopoly Non-transparent pricing strategiespricing information
exchanges take place only when cooperation is desired
Wholesale - If a company raises the price of some of its
supply contracts for next year is unlikely that a competitor
can benefit from an increase in sales since it works with itstraditional clients
Real complex and non-fungible goods
Antitrust law
C di ti h i t l/ ti l
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
103/106
Coordinationhorizontal/vertical Horizontal structures define the same level of
economic activity (producers, sellers).
Vertical structures are considered:
Integration on technological flows (upstream-downstream),
producer-seller,
In line with the supplies of raw materials or parts.
How do we establish the influence of the oligopolistic
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
104/106
How do we establish the influence of the oligopolistic
horizontal coordination on free competition?
market definitionmonitoring through specialized bodies(setting the price increase threshold)
sales concentration (degree of market concentration)determine the share in total salesH-H index
barriers to entry (see Porter's Forces)
other market characteristics
Predator behavior (price dumping)
degree of complexity pertaining to the supplied goods quality
Suppliers history on that market.
efficiency and cost savings following a merger.
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
105/106
The case of coordination through vertical integration
Merger between two independent firms that had made
transactions, on being the others supplier
Where do problems occur?
long-term contractsmake the entrance of a new seller or buyerimpossible
franchise, sales, leasing, licensing, sales, exclusive, contractualrequirements, territorial restrictions
resale price maintenanceprice strategy used by the manufacturer tocontrol the final consumer price
informational limitations
conditional sales contractsconditions the delivery of a good by thepurchase of another good
8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD
106/106
The difficultyestablishing the boundaries of the intervention
Regulation of competition Involves complex mechanisms
It is costly
It is unnecessary when the barriers created by state
regulations produce Pareto efficiency losses(beyond the benefits of regulation)?
Notnecessarilythe case of merit goods
But yes, looking for the solution of self-regulation: professional associations
agreements on compliance with quality goods and services
fair rules of doing business.