+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Economic Analysis of PD

Economic Analysis of PD

Date post: 02-Jun-2018
Category:
Upload: ionut-sandu
View: 221 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 106

Transcript
  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    1/106

    ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF

    PUBLIC DECISIONSEconomics of the Public Sector

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    2/106

    Course outline

    1. Introduction to Public Sector Economics

    2. The system of public economics

    3. The state, actor of public economy

    4. The Public Sectorstructure, reform5. The market failure

    6. Labour market

    7. Competition

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    3/106

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    4/106

    Why does PS economics interest us? (1)

    Public economics is a branch of economics that aims at

    analysing public decisions in economic terms (Matei

    2003)

    Reason: the need for organising the public activities

    Regulation

    Price setting

    Supply of public goods and services

    Publicrevenues

    Publicexpenditures

    - Taxes andtariffs/duties

    - Income from

    capital

    - Income from

    states privategoods

    - Borrowing

    - Transfers- Expenditures

    with public

    policies

    - Capital

    expenses

    - Interest

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    5/106

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    6/106

    What is our aim? (1)

    Introduce aspects of public economics, economic toolsand so on

    - concepts, notions

    Substantiate these elements through theoriesin the fieldof public economics

    Strengthen your knowledge of public economics with

    special reference to the European states economy,American or Asian economy if relevant to the subjectupon debatepublic intervention, market failure and soon.

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    7/106

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    8/106

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    9/106

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    10/106

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    11/106

    Triple view of public economy

    Facts, phenomenaand economic

    processes

    Publicadministrations and

    enterprises (orprivately heldenterprisesengaged in theproduction of publicgoods or services)

    Sciencetheeconomic analysis

    of public decisions(ECONOMICS)

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    12/106

    The object of public actions

    Regulation

    Price setting

    (through taxes, duties,subsidies)

    Production of public goodsand services

    Consequences Publicrevenues

    Publicexpenditures

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    13/106

    The public economics principle Human needs are always greater

    than the available resources.

    Resources = factors of production(land La, labour L and capital K). La (Land) = natural resources.

    L (Labour) = physical and mentalcapacity of workers to produce goods

    and services. K (Capital) = goods that do not directly

    satisfy human needs: factories,machineries, equipment used toproduce other goods.

    Is money considered capital ineconomics ?

    The concerns of the public decision-maker:

    What is to be produced?

    How is to be produced?

    For whom is it to be produced?

    How are these decisions made?

    Scarcity

    Choice

    Needs

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    14/106

    What is to be produced?

    Production possibilityfrontier

    Resource allocation inbetween the two

    industries (public goods,

    private goods)

    Efficient allocation: A, B

    A B public goods private goods

    Inefficient allocation: C Infeasible allocation: D

    Public

    goods

    Private

    goods

    A

    B

    C

    D

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    15/106

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    16/106

    For who is to be produced? How are these decision made?

    The distribution problem is

    influenced by: Fiscal policy;

    Social policy;

    Provided public goods (satisfy the needsof certain groups).

    Free rider issue(linking the paymentwith the benefits the tendency to

    lie about the benefits)

    Wagner Law(law of public activityincrease in the developed countriesthrough corelation with thenational income) an economicdevelopment pushes for more public

    spending laissezfaire

    Redistribution (matching the needsfor social aid to the financingobtained through taxes)

    Collectively

    David Hume - tragedy of the

    commons

    Stages of collective (public) decision:

    Knowing the public sector activities

    and organization:

    Financing method;

    Expenditures and taxes (on a

    central and local level);

    Anticipating the consequences:

    The effects of a tax on return

    (price increase, wage cut);

    Increasing the retirement age;

    Assessing the alternatives;

    The influence of the political factor.

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    17/106

    Utility and preference

    Let us rememberUtilityreal/assumed capacity of a good to satisfy a need.Economic utility = satisfaction felt by an individual after consuming a

    good.

    Marginal utility = the value of the last consumed quantity of a good; thegain in satisfaction after consuming an additional quantity from an

    economic good.Indifference curve (isoutility) = combinations of goods from which the

    consumer hopes to receive the same level of satisfaction.

    Why does it interest us?

    In the analysis of public economythe four pillars:

    Optimum;

    Public goods;

    Collective choices;

    Justice.

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    18/106

    Optimum

    A balanced situation preferred by everyone (equilibrium);

    Is reached by the presence of other individuals producing

    spillovers (externalities) positive or negative (beneficial or

    harmful); The value of an old house in a new neighborhood;

    Pollution;

    E.g. (Stiglitz, 2010) situations in which a trade involves certain costs

    and benefits for third parties (non-participants).

    Pareto Optimumno individual can be made better offwithout someone being made worse off efficient resourceallocation

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    19/106

    Public goods

    Some goods will either not be supplied by the market or, ifsupplied, will be supplied in insufficient quantity.

    Pure public goods:

    It costs nothing for an additional individual to enjoy their benefits;

    It is difficult or impossible to exclude individuals from the enjoyment of

    a pure public good.

    As more individuals join the group consuming the public

    good its quality could decrease. The optimum size of a

    groups consuming a certain good is analyzed by the theory

    of clubsBuchanan, 1965.

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    20/106

    Collective choicesExample of collective decision-makingthe voting paradox (Marquis de Condorcet)

    Voting preferences

    As preferences Bs preferences Cs preferences

    First choice Shrek Twitty Tom

    Second choice Twitty Tom Shrek

    Third choice Tom Shrek Twitty

    2:1

    2:1

    tranzitivity ?

    NO ! 2:1

    The majority vote can only

    compare two preferences and

    cannot decide the order of all

    preferences!

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    21/106

    Justice

    Socially acceptable objective of the Government: Protecting life and property;

    Economic efficiency(obtaining the best result with limited resources);

    Reaching a standard of justice (equity) (income distributionequalvs. differentiated);

    Economic growth;

    Economic stability.

    Tradeoff between equity and efficiency

    leaky bucket

    Economic policyfulfilling the criteria of economic efficiency; Social policyaims at fair income distribution.

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    22/106

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    23/106

    L'tat c'est moi!

    Improving the utility of one individual must not diminishthe utility of another individual.

    The individuals incapacity to cooperate market failure

    Public economyactors: Manorganized in communities (or any other organizations)

    Statethrough:

    Power of coercionmonopoly on:

    Law making;

    National defense; Management of military reserves during war.

    Accountabilitylimited power through nations will (Constitution, laws);

    Motivationpublic interest.

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    24/106

    How much does the state matter?Public expenditures (% GDP)

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    25/106

    States functions Allocative function

    Government intervention in the allocative

    function of the market to correct its negative effects;

    Distribution functionensuring equity, social justice on thedistribution of income and wealth;

    Stability functionmitigate market failures in the national economyas inflation, unemployment, stagnating economic growth, balance of

    payments imbalances;

    Regulatory functionmaintenance of individual behavior withinlimits imposed by society and contract discipline (through a functioning

    legal system).

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    26/106

    Allocative function

    Property right Belongs to an individual (private property)the right to exclude other

    individuals from the benefits provided by a certain good;

    Belongs to more individuals (common property)the right of a groupof individuals to benefit without boundaries from the object of that

    property (see tragedy of the commons andfree rider); The use of common property right:

    Umg=Price

    It does not involve scarce resources

    Otherwise:

    Excessive use (like in the case of excess hunting and fishing);

    Premature exhaustion of natural resources;

    Congestion (in the case ofpositional goods goods having an insufficient supplyand their production cannot be easily increase).

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    27/106

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    28/106

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    29/106

    Regulatory function (1)

    Regulating the producers and consumers decisions so toreduce:

    Tendencies towards monopoly;

    Negative externalities.

    Why the State and not another actor?

    There are large costs (for the individual consumers) of obtaining and

    interpreting information about product safety;

    The individuals may not be able to protect themselves because they

    do not have the resources at their disposal to establish minimum

    standards and quality control. Regularization limits the discretionary behavior and freedom

    of individuals by imposing rules.

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    30/106

    Regulatory function (2)

    Regulations are based on legal norms aimed at: Protecting the consumer against fraud,

    Preventing damage to consumer health,

    Control the design of goods so as to ensure their safe operation,

    Ensure harmless conditions of employment,

    Control the commercial systems, biological research etc.

    The State also regulates:

    Money supply;

    Prices of utilities and nationalized industries;

    Many of the allocative decisions in the economy (through price andincome policies).

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    31/106

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    32/106

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    33/106

    Stability function (1)

    When does it intervene? In case of macroeconomic imbalances (inflation, unemployment,economic downturn, deficits of the trade balance and balance ofpayments etc.)

    To reach the macroeconomic targets:

    Economic growth Job securityreducing unemployment;

    Price stabilityinflation control;

    External balancebalance of payments.

    How?

    Through monetary and fiscal policy instruments used to restorebalance

    By coordinating the economic decisions of different groups ofeconomic actors from the private sector

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    34/106

    Stability function (2)

    Economic growth global process referring to an upward evolution of certain aggregate

    economic measures, over a period of time, on a national or

    international level, and producing favorable effects both economically

    and socially.

    an element of continuity beyond the particular macroeconomic policiesimplemented by one government or another.

    takes place long term, governments are often faced with cyclicity,

    requiring reformulationof the objectives of economic growth:

    Establishing a social, economic and institutional environment favorable to

    economic growth Ensuring balance for an economic growth path (Keynes)

    Targeting economic recovery (growth of real national income vs. Growth of

    potential national income)limit economic cycle oscillation for ensuringsustainable and balanced economic growth

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    35/106

    Stability function (3)

    Jobs security Utopia heavily promoted during the communist command

    economic system

    Associated with the right to work

    Open access to the labor market institutional and economic environment to stimulate the

    development of economic initiative

    Confusion!

    States responsibility to ensuring the general conditions for everyindividual to work (with the appropriate exceptions)

    States duty to secure jobs for all those who want to work oversizing the public sector developing the PS in accordance with

    different criteria, noteconomic efficiency

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    36/106

    Stability function (4)

    Reformulating theobjective:

    Much more productive

    Full use of production factors (L

    included) means:

    Their efficient use (optimum use)

    by every economic agent

    NOTusing all factors of production

    available at a time

    unemployment rate 0

    (an unemployment rate lower than the

    natural rate can cause short circuits

    on the labor market)

    A difference must be made interms of types of unemployment

    Securing jobs

    Reduce

    unemployment

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    37/106

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    38/106

    Stability function (6)

    Price stabilityAssociated with the anti-inflationary policies The dilemma of macroeconomic policiesreducing unemployment

    or reducing inflation

    The achievement of a high degree of pr ice stabi l i ty; this will be

    apparent from a rate of inf lat ion which is close to that of, at most,the three best performing Member States in terms of price stability(one of the convergence criteria)

    Where is Romania standing?

    Inflation/deflation/disinflation?

    What is the supervising body?

    Through what tools?

    Also contributes to regulating competitiontendency toartificially increase prices for monopoly and oligopoly

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    39/106

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    40/106

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    41/106

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    42/106

    How do we define the public sector in economic terms?

    3. Time

    Short term

    State budget Public revenues and

    expenditures = Correlating

    the budget with the publicsector size

    Shows the balance/imbalance Budget surplus (can show a

    false profitability, inflationarysituations)

    Budget deficit (commonsituation)

    Long term The public sector itself

    Marginal social benefit (MSB) =marginal revenue of the publicsector

    Marginal social costul (MSC) =cost of administering the publicsector

    MSB = MSC optimum size ofthe public sector

    MSB > MSCpublic sector isefficient, in terms of profitability

    MSB < MSCoversizing thepublic sector, low publicservice efficiency

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    43/106

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    44/106

    How do we define the public sector in economic terms?

    5. In terms of other criteria

    Negative versus positive economic policy Negativepromotes competition, anti-monopoly, neutrality in thenational economic space

    Positivedirect state involvement, supporting imports and exports,measures favoring the economic

    Nationalization versus privatization Common objectives :

    Improving resource allocation;

    Improving pricing and investment policies;

    Distinct objectives: Nationalizationstrengthening the public sector and national strategies,

    control of natural resources;

    Privatizationimprove efficiency and reduce costs, reduce the needs ofbudget financing/ public borrowing.

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    45/106

    Reforming the public sector (1) What is it? Politic activity

    Why do we need it? Improving efficiency in public resource allocation;

    Greater justice in income distribution.

    What does it depend upon?

    Technology; Economic and political circumstances.

    What are the reform reasons? Institutional reform;

    Reducing expenditures, costs savings

    Who influences the reform? Decentralization institutional change (political and administrative);

    Privatization institutional change (economic);

    Private sectorderegulation (to intensify competition).

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    46/106

    Reforming the public sector(2)Results in the public sector

    Expansion/reduction ofpublic sector

    Decentralization

    Privatization

    Deregulation

    Exemples Decentralization

    Expansion of public services

    Reducing expenditures through a

    better allocation

    Privatization Expansion after changing the state-

    owned company into a joint stock

    company (still state-owned)

    Reducing PS by transferring social

    assistance to the private sector

    Deregulation

    Expansion due to cost coverage

    (American financial system)

    Reducing PS through careful

    deregulation

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    47/106

    Reforming the public sector (3)Micro-focused

    Focused on single programs;

    Technical and administrative

    nature.

    Macro-focused Focused on the general

    dimension of PS;

    Political nature.

    Both strategies aim at:

    Either improving results through:

    Introducing new programs; Technologies; Institutions.

    Or cost savings.

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    48/106

    Reforming the public sector (4) Privatizationcan cover:

    Sales of public property;

    Long-term lease of publicinfrastructure, privateenterprises;

    Use of decision-makingprocesses like contracting andbidding (procurement);

    Replacement authority as amechanism of coordination withmarket mechanisms;

    Insertion of market incentives inthe reward system for the publicofficials.

    Decentralization strategy

    replaced:

    Planning

    Rigid budgets

    Control

    System ofrules

    Supervising

    Evaluation

    Performancebudgets

    Managementby objectives

    Frameworklegislation

    Discretion

    Do these contribute to productivity and efficiency increase?

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    49/106

    AnswerEfficiency

    Can be stimulated by a local

    administrative (decentralized)

    system, but moving resources

    (down) does not necessarily

    improve efficiency (e.g. police andjustice)

    Reduction policies are neutral in

    relation to efficiency or inefficiency

    in the PS

    ProductivityAimed at through

    privatization

    Need for increased competition

    on the supply side

    Expanding opportunities for

    selection on the demand side

    Will these released resources be used for public sector

    development?!

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    50/106

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    51/106

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    52/106

    Structural analysis of sectors of activity

    Existentcompetitorsin the field

    Potentialcompetitors

    Buyers

    Substituteproducts

    Suppliers

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    53/106

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    54/106

    Idea The five forcesare the grounds for STRATEGY

    development reflect the complexity of competitionin a sector

    A greater intensity of competition is registered under perfect competition(free market entrance, existing players have no bargaining power withsuppliers and customers, and the rivalry is unlimited due to the presence of

    a large number of identical products) Influence the profitabilityof a sector

    Lower return if there is a better and cheaper substitute

    Or if there is market rivalry

    Do not consider factors that may influence short-term return - have

    TACTICAL significance Fluctuations in the economic situation;

    Shortages of raw materials;

    Strikes;

    Demand fluctuations, etc.

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    55/106

    1. Threat of new entrants

    Barriers to entry in a particular industry Economies of scale

    Product differentiation

    Financial needs

    Costs of changing partner Access to distribution channels

    Cost disadvantages independent of scale economies (know-how)

    Existing reactions from the existing players

    Price to prevent entry Characteristics of the barriers to entry (e.g. exclusive rights

    to technology)

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    56/106

    2. Intensity of rivalry between existent

    actorsDepends on structural factors:

    The presence of a large

    number of actors or actors of

    equal size

    Slow sector development

    pace

    High storage or fixed costs

    Lack of differentiation or

    partner switching costs

    High strategic stakes

    High barriers to exit

    Entrancebarriers

    High

    Low Low

    stable

    earnings

    Low,risky

    earnings

    Large,

    stableearnings

    Large,

    riskyearnings

    Exit barriersLow High

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    57/106

    3. Pressure from the substitute products

    Perform a function identical to that of the product in question

    Presents a dangerous cost-performance rate for the

    products in a particular sector

    Attitude towards substitute products takes the form of

    collective action (Buy American)

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    58/106

    4. Bargaining power of buyers

    It is a focused group or buy a large quantity of theconcerned products

    Products are standard or undifferentiated

    The switching cost is reduced

    The buyer has complete information

    In case of upstream integration

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    59/106

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    60/106

    Let us remember Public policy objectives impose:

    The need for a market mix;

    Technically possible (PPF); What and how is prod uced?

    What individuals prefer (utility). Whom for?

    Public intervention. How are these decision s taken?

    The aims is to ensure a Pareto efficient economy (the idealsituation)

    Namely a competitive economy

    With an efficient resource allocation

    What if the market fails?

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    61/106

    Failure dissatisfaction

    You always want what you do not have! The idea of an alternative way to organize the economy

    (more advantageous for one who thinks of it)

    Maybe you are right!

    Markets (almost always) produce too much of something(pollution) and too little something(research);

    a change that improves the situation of the rich without

    affecting the poor is also Pareto efficient

    The market intervention can happen both when markets

    fail, and when the markets are efficient

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    62/106

    Interventionthe beginning Property right

    tragedy of the commons Property guarantee leads to:

    Improvement (rent vs. property);

    Increased saving and investment capacity.

    Contracts guarantee

    The problem of the overdue loans

    Government intervenes to protect the citizens and

    their rights

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    63/106

    The intervention generated by market failure Six situations in which the markets are not Pareto efficient:

    1. Failure of competition

    2. Public goods

    3. Externalities

    4. Incomplete markets

    5. Failure of information

    6. Unemployment, inflation and imbalance

    ! Failure = the best possible result was NOT reached= inability of individuals to cooperate

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    64/106

    1. Failure of competition

    Pareto efficiency means perfect competition (idealsituation)

    Number of companies is large enough to keep the

    market priceunchanged

    Otherwise:

    Monopoly

    Oligopoly

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    65/106

    Reasons to limit competition Competitive advantage of large companies

    When the production cost decreases with the production growth

    (economies of scale)

    Natural monopoly

    A company produces cheaper together with other companies (utilitieswater, electricity etc.)

    Large transport costs

    Granting patents / licenses - they stimulate innovation, but

    restrict competition

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    66/106

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    67/106

    3. Externalities The actions of an individual / a firm raises costs for another

    individual / companynegative externalities

    Examples:

    Pollution

    Use of cars traffic jam more time spent while driving higher risk

    (accidents)

    Individuals do not cover the total cost of negative externalities they

    generate they will get involved in more and more activities ofthis kind

    People do not enjoy the full benefit of the positive externalities tempted to get involved less and less in such activities

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    68/106

    4. Incomplete markets Not only pure public goods and services are those that

    private markets fail to provide

    A completemarket - providing all goods and services for

    which the delivery cost is lower than the cost that individuals

    are willing to pay

    An incompletemarket - which fails to provide these goods

    and services

    Examples:

    Failure of the insurance marketcovering all types of risk

    Failure of real estate marketfirst house loan

    Failure of students loans market

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    69/106

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    70/106

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    71/106

    6. Unemployment, inflation and imbalance

    The most common symptoms of market failure

    Indicators of market failure but also of macroeconomic

    imbalances

    Influence the structure of fiscal policy

    Heavily regulated on a regional level

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    72/106

    Intervention on efficient markets Income distribution

    Competitive markets Equal distribution

    Government intervenes for income redistribution (social services)

    Merit goods

    Perfect information does not always lead to good decisions Smoking, seat belt

    this type of intervention = paternalism(example: drug prohibition,compulsory social security) libertarianism

    Paternalism (smoking ban) externality (example: the cost of smokingmay be covered by a fee)

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    73/106

    The consequences of failure Changes made by state intervention are often unpredictable

    Public policies aimed at ambiguous concepts such as

    serving the public interest

    Even the implementation of policies may be a failure (due to

    complexity)

    Government intervention is not free, is made through a

    bureaucracy that is expensive to administer

    Rent-seeking- lobbying to influence regulatory policies

    (price distortion) which lowers social welfare (social costs)

    (monopoly - transfer of wealth from buyer to producer)

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    74/106

    Let us remember Market fails

    Markets (almost

    always) produce too

    much of something

    (pollution) and toolittle of something

    (research);

    Market is efficient

    Marginal benefit =

    Marginal cost = PriceQ

    P

    SD

    E

    QE

    PE

    0

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    75/106

    Equilibrium (balance) on the labor market What do we take into

    account?

    Supply of labor

    Demand of labor

    Quantity of the good (labor)

    Price of labor

    Significance of the

    imbalances

    I over-wage II over-quantity

    III under-wage

    IV under-quantity

    L

    w

    SLDLI

    II

    III

    IV

    LE

    wE

    0

    E

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    76/106

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    77/106

    Overuse of labor Can lead to overproduction of goods

    Associated to an economic boom

    USA 2006-2007unemployment rate < 5%

    Oversizing the wages

    The costs of labor (L) increase

    Inflationary pressures occur

    Solution = perfect competition (equality of wages) ?!

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    78/106

    Change in wages Type of job

    Education (undergrad studies, high school etc.)

    Age

    Experience at work (employee loyalty, encourage employment

    stability and enterprise attachment) does not substitute theworkers competence

    Gender and race (discriminations)

    Market type (the case of the unionized labor markets)

    Imperfections of the labor market

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    79/106

    Competition on the labor market Monopsony on the labo r market

    A single dominant buyer

    The small companies will follow the wage policy of the large

    companies

    Particular case : coordinated oligopsony (agreement between the

    companies on wage levels)

    Effects:

    Lower wage levels

    Lower employment levels (in comparison to the perfectcompetition)

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    80/106

    MonopsonyMonopsony with low wage

    There is no negotiation on

    wages, or differentiations in

    these negotiations

    The hiring conditions arepre-established (wage

    included)

    Labor: Accepts the monopsonys

    terms,

    Leaves the area to search for

    work (uncommon, due to

    rigidity)

    Monopsony with differentiated wages

    hiring is done in groups

    wage negotiations take

    place in groups or even

    individually

    Wages are set differently, so

    that the wage costs do not

    exceed the planned level

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    81/106

    Monopoly on the labor market The union sets a wage salary (Wi)

    The employment level will be QC,

    pertaining to the labor demand

    Real supply is largerQr

    The area WiEcQcO represents

    supplementary income of the

    employees (Union members)

    The area ABQrQc (limited by WE)

    represents losses for the workers

    who could still be hired if the labor

    market would be competitive Pareto inefficiency

    BA

    Wi

    Qc Qr

    Ec Er

    Q

    W

    S

    DE

    QE

    WE

    0

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    82/106

    The monopolymonopsony confrontation Described by the negotiation power of the two sides

    Creates powerful actors Unions

    Employers associations

    Trigger Large transaction costs on the labor market

    Free rider behavior Illegal hiring

    Hiring immigrants

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    83/106

    State interventions on the labor market Setting a minimum wage

    Discourages the use of illegal labor since taxes and contributions arecalculated as percentages relative to the entrance wage

    Diminishes the unduly monopsony profits received through wagedifferentiation

    Avoids a low employment level (artificially)

    Establishing the minimum wageon the level of the wage of thatmarket balance, otherwise imbalances occur

    The meaning of the minimum wagea policy tool to correct the

    income distribution and to combat povertyAlternativeraise taxes on high wage earners (also affects

    companies through the contributions quota)

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    84/106

    Regulating the labor market

    Limiting the excesses of the two main poles of the

    labor market: union - monopoly

    employersmonopsony

    Involves two categories of actions: Trade unions and employers regulation in order to prevent excesses

    and discrimination;

    Direct involvement in the negotiations between unions and employers

    as a mediator to ensure convergence to the labor markets optimum.

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    85/106

    Regulations on employers Consider void the employment contracts subject to not belonging

    to the union (yellow-dog contracts); Declare as core labor rights: the right to self-organization of labor

    and the right to collective bargaining;

    Prohibit employers to interfere in trade union activities and createobstacles to trade union organization;

    Prohibit employers discrimination against union membershippertaining to hiring, firing and promotions;

    Consider illegal to discriminate against any worker who has claimsagainst employers, or testify against him;

    Require employers to properly negotiate with the unions, withoutresorting to pressure or threats;

    Prohibit or limits wage discrimination based on gender, race,religious beliefs etc.

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    86/106

    Regulations on unions

    Address three main areas:

    Union organization

    Unfair union practices

    Right to strike

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    87/106

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    88/106

    Unfair union practices Pressure on employees to become union members

    Judicial jams

    Secondary boycotts (confrontation between unions)

    Sympathy strikes

    Discriminatory or excessive contributions

    Refusal to negotiate with employers

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    89/106

    The right to strike Free way of expressing the attitude of workers

    about the working conditions

    The aim should refer to the labor market

    Otherwise, are prohibited: Political strikes

    Religious strikes

    solidarity or social groups strikes.

    Are also prohibited : Strikes that can block the entire national economy and

    may endanger public health,

    or national security.

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    90/106

    Let us remember Economysystem organized on markets:

    Labor market

    Market of goods and services

    Monetary market

    An efficient market = a competitive market

    Perfect competition

    Imperfect competition Non-optimal income distribution

    State intervention

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    91/106

    The Pareto inefficiency of monopoly Monopoly

    Best known case of imperfect competition

    Lack of competition on one goods market

    The supplier has discretionary powers on settingthe operating conditions of a goods market

    Monopolistic competition Who is competing against monopoly?

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    92/106

    Who is competing against monopoly? With the companies that produce substitutable goods in

    relation to the good self-produced.

    With any other company the limited nature of short-termincome.

    Considering short-term consumer income constant, it results that any

    increase in consumption of a good will lead to a reduction in

    consumption of another good, regardless of the relationship of

    substitutability or complementarity.

    Advantages of monopoly will attract other supplier/

    manufacturers.

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    93/106

    Monopolys strategies

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    94/106

    Legend (1) Monopoly faces the market demand demand curve

    around the gates of the company will be identical with thoseof market demand.

    The optimal level of monopoly output (Q*) is set in relation tothe intersection of marginal revenue with marginal cost curve(Vm < VM)

    The price corresponding to this level of supply is P*, butmarket demand is at a higher marginal income PC> P*

    Monopoly can set the supply at its discretion (the onlysupplier)

    Usually the monopolistic firm restricts the supply to get ahigher sales price (the more the supply curve will be to theleft, the higher the price will get)

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    95/106

    Legend (2) The monopoly obtains superprofit (S), as the difference

    between the profit pertaining to the intersection between thedemand curve and the supply curve (PC) and optimizing

    price (P*)

    Pareto optimum? No.

    Obtaining superprofit is in the detriment of consumers, meaning thatthe Q* solution is not Pareto optimum

    The prices are higher than the level pertaining to profit maximization

    (P*)

    Are there favorable conditions for monopoly? When it doesnot worsen the welfare of others

    The case of the technological monopolyimproving technologicalperformance can be found in welfare improvements (R & D)

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    96/106

    The Pareto inefficiency of oligopoly

    Kinked (broken)

    demand curve

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    97/106

    Legend (1) Initial situation (Q0, P0).

    Temptationprice control.

    The oligopolistic firm has the following alternatives: If it wants to increase the price, the demand will suddenly turn elastic because

    its product that became more expensive will be substituted by powerful

    products of other firms from the oligopoly that have kept the price unchanged

    losses for the supplier.

    If it intends to reduce the price, the demand will turn inelastic, because at least

    one other firm from the oligopoly will do the same, and the sales surplus willbe split between firms that reduce price losses for the supplier.

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    98/106

    Legend (2) The marginal income Vm in the case of the imperfect

    competition is below average income (of the marketdemand) the marginal revenue curve of the oligopolisticfirm will be discontinuous

    Point Nmarginal revenue curve break (slope changes inthe firm's demand curve)

    The second part of the marginal revenue curve is negative

    (which measures the change in total revenue of thecompany to lower prices, unlike the first part which describesthe change in revenue from an increase in price)

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    99/106

    Solutionnegotiation

    Cooperationbetweenfirms in the oligopoly

    avoids the kinked curve

    and the firm gains

    because the income

    earned due to price

    increase is larger than

    the income lost due to

    sales quantity drop

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    100/106

    Methods of coordination in the oligopoly

    Trustfirms are horizontally integrated through joint assets monopoly

    Cartelfirms keep their autonomy (e.g. OPEC)

    Coordination may be based on agreements negotiated bythe participants

    These agreements provide for:

    commodity prices,

    local markets,

    Supply quotas assigned to each participant.

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    101/106

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    102/106

    Coordination difficulties in the oligopoly Non-transparent pricing strategiespricing information

    exchanges take place only when cooperation is desired

    Wholesale - If a company raises the price of some of its

    supply contracts for next year is unlikely that a competitor

    can benefit from an increase in sales since it works with itstraditional clients

    Real complex and non-fungible goods

    Antitrust law

    C di ti h i t l/ ti l

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    103/106

    Coordinationhorizontal/vertical Horizontal structures define the same level of

    economic activity (producers, sellers).

    Vertical structures are considered:

    Integration on technological flows (upstream-downstream),

    producer-seller,

    In line with the supplies of raw materials or parts.

    How do we establish the influence of the oligopolistic

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    104/106

    How do we establish the influence of the oligopolistic

    horizontal coordination on free competition?

    market definitionmonitoring through specialized bodies(setting the price increase threshold)

    sales concentration (degree of market concentration)determine the share in total salesH-H index

    barriers to entry (see Porter's Forces)

    other market characteristics

    Predator behavior (price dumping)

    degree of complexity pertaining to the supplied goods quality

    Suppliers history on that market.

    efficiency and cost savings following a merger.

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    105/106

    The case of coordination through vertical integration

    Merger between two independent firms that had made

    transactions, on being the others supplier

    Where do problems occur?

    long-term contractsmake the entrance of a new seller or buyerimpossible

    franchise, sales, leasing, licensing, sales, exclusive, contractualrequirements, territorial restrictions

    resale price maintenanceprice strategy used by the manufacturer tocontrol the final consumer price

    informational limitations

    conditional sales contractsconditions the delivery of a good by thepurchase of another good

  • 8/10/2019 Economic Analysis of PD

    106/106

    The difficultyestablishing the boundaries of the intervention

    Regulation of competition Involves complex mechanisms

    It is costly

    It is unnecessary when the barriers created by state

    regulations produce Pareto efficiency losses(beyond the benefits of regulation)?

    Notnecessarilythe case of merit goods

    But yes, looking for the solution of self-regulation: professional associations

    agreements on compliance with quality goods and services

    fair rules of doing business.


Recommended