Date post: | 02-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | bartholomew-lewis |
View: | 224 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Economic Development
Division of Economic Activities
• Primary Sector (ag)–
• Secondary Sector (industry) -
• Tertiary Sector (services)-
• Quaternary Sector (service- research/development)
Comparative Economic Sectors-CIA World Factbook, 2010 Estimates
Country Primary Secondary Tertiary
England .5% 23.7% 75.8%
Russia 5.4% 37.1% 57.5%
China 12.5% 47.3% 40.3%
Mexico 3.8% 25.9% 70.2%
Nigeria 26.9% 48.7% 24.4%
Iran 11.6% 42.4% 46%
Economic Indicators of Development
• GDP
• Types of Jobs
• Worker Productivity
• Access to Raw Materials
• Availability of consumer goods
• **Usually economic development coincides with social development** WHY
Self-Sufficiency Model (Balanced Growth Approach)
• Money (investment) should be spread equally amongst all sectors and regions of a country
• Promoted by setting barriers that limit imports from other places…Taxes, quotas
Self-Sufficiency
PRO• Its fair• Incomes in rural
areas keep pace with incomes in cities
• Reducing poverty more important than individual wealth
CON• Protects inefficient
businesses• Large bureaucracy• Local businesses
don’t compete in world market
Modernization Theory- Rostow“Economic prosperity is open to all
countries”Traditional Stage – Families, tradition,
subsistence farmers, lives similar to ancestors
Rostow
Take-Off Stage – Producing goods to sellIndustrial revolutionUrbanization increasesGreater individualism-
willingness to take risks, desire for ‘things’becoming consumers
Rostow
Drive to technological maturity –
Focus on obtaining higher standard of living
Poverty reduced, cities grow, population slows- kids are more expensive to raise
International trade
Rostow
High Mass Consumption-
Luxury items…now ‘necessities’
high incomesMajority of workers in
the service industry
Rostow
“Modernization” = “Westernization”
Tradition is the greatest barrier to economic development
Rostow
Pro- High income helps
poorer countries- Control population
growth- Increase food
production- Take advantage of
industrialized technology
- Foreign aid
Con- Justifies capitalist
system…development of stratified society?
- Harder for poor to get ahead
- Suggests poor countries are to blame for their plight.
Dependency Theory- Wallerstein
Capitalist World Economy – 3 types of nations
1) Core Countries – rich nations take raw materials channel wealth to NA, Eur. Aus., Japan
2) Countries of the Periphery – low income, drawn in by colonial exploitation, support with inexpensive labor large markets
3) Countries of the semi periphery- in between- exert more power than periphery but less than core.
Wallerstein
Pro- No country is in
isolation…pro??
Con- Responsibility for
poverty on rich nations- Industrialized nations
block development by exploiting poorer nations
- Culture that discourages economic growth not taken into consideration
Compare and contrast
1. How are the theories similar?
2. How are the theories different?
3. Which one do you tend to think would work best?....or which parts of each do you agree with?
Key Issues
• Why do less developed countries face obstacles to economic development? What are those obsticles?