1
Economic Input-Output Life Cycle Analysis
Lester Lave, Chris Hendrickson, & Scott Matthews
Green Design InstituteCarnegie Mellon University
June 2005
2
Why Life Cycle Analysis?
• Social Goal: Better environmental quality & a more sustainable economy
• Focusing on one phase is misleading: Battery powered cars, hydrogen cars
• Need to examine all materials & energy going in & all discharges coming out from “cradle to grave” – extraction to disposal
• ISO 14000 has defined a protocol for LCA
3
Life Cycle Analysis:Extraction to End of Disposal
Need to Account for Indirect Inputs
4
Process Analysis: SETAC
• Until recently, LCA was done only by doing detailed materials & energy balances of each relevant process
• This is time consuming & expensive, e.g., multi-million dollar US automobile study
• Cannot examine all contributing processes & so need to draw, arbitrarily, a boundary as to what is considered – most is left out
5
Simplified Process Analysis:Materials Balance for Coke Oven
Source: McMichael & Polenske
6
LCA Too Complicated!
• Materials & energy balances for thousands (millions?) of processes?
• Can’t we just approximate an LCA?• LCA proportional to cost, weight, or
petroleum use of a good or service• Is each dollar of economic activity equally
consumptive of resources• Is each pound of a product?• Is each liter of petroleum used?
7
Approximations to LCA
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Computers Automobiles Banking Air Travel Electricity Shoes
Air Pollutants per $ 1M (metric ton)
Air Pollutants per lb of production (hg)
Air Pollutants per TJ of petroleum (metric tons)
Toxic Discharges per $ 1M (metric tons)
Toxic Discharges per lb (g)
Toxic Discharges per TJ of petroleum (kg)
Energy used per $ 1M (TJ)
Energy used per lb (TJ)
Energy used per TJ of petroleum (TJ)
8
From I-O to EIO-LCA• To US Input-Output table we append
government data bases available by I-O sector: Inputs of energy, fuels, emissions of air pollutants & greenhouse gases, water use, occupational injury & death, waste discharged, etc.
• To do an LCA, we approximate each input by an I-O sector
• We observe direct, & compute indirect, inputs with implied outputs & discharges
9
Supply Chain: Making $1 million of Computer Peripherals Equipt. in 1997 ($)
Total for all supply sectors 2,985,000Computer peripheral equipment 1,083,000Semiconductors & related devices 347,000Wholesale trade 241,000Other electronic components 211,000Noncomparable imports 73,000Motors & generators 60,000Miscellaneous plastics products 48,000Real estate 45,000Advertising 43,000
10
$1 million of Computers
48,000.1Semiconductors & related devices
37,000.1Other electronic components8,800.2Paper & paperboard mills
450.3Air transportation9,900.3
Industrial inorganic & organic chemicals
900.3Trucking & courier services, except air
14,000.4Blast furnaces & steel mills17,000.4Wholesale trade
110,000.5Computer peripheral equipment
362.6Electric services (utilities)440,0006.8Total for all sectors
KWhTJElectricity Total Energy
11
From SETAC & EIO-LCA to Hybrid
12
Making EIO-LCA More Useful• Hybrid LCA: Use process analysis as
inputs (composition of a car) or outputs (PM produced by air emissions)
• Technical change: Modify coefficients• Disaggregate sectors• Location of activity & discharges• Materials flows: Physical units for metals• Valuing environmental discharges• Enterprise I-O models• Uncertainty modeling
13
14
Some EIO-LCA Outputs
• What follows are some examples of analyses done with EIO-LCA
• First, a look at which sectors of the economy use the most resources & are most polluting
15
Per Million Dollars of Economic Output
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
Ener
gy
(10^
6Ter
ajoule
s)
RCRA h
azar
dous
was
tes
gen
erat
ed(1
0^
6 m
etric
tons)
Glo
bal
War
min
gPote
ntial
(10^
5 m
tCO
2 e
quiv
.)
Ener
gy
(10^
6Ter
ajoule
s)
RCRA h
azar
dous
was
tes
gen
erat
ed(1
0^
6 m
etric
tons)
Glo
bal
War
min
gPote
ntial
(10^
5 m
tCO
2 e
quiv
.)
Ener
gy
(10^
6Ter
ajoule
s)
RCRA h
azar
dous
was
tes
gen
erat
ed(1
0^
6 m
etric
tons)
Glo
bal
War
min
gPote
ntial
(10^
5 m
tCO
2 e
quiv
.)
Ener
gy
(10^
6Ter
ajoule
s)
RCRA h
azar
dous
was
tes
gen
erat
ed(1
0^
6 m
etric
tons)
Glo
bal
War
min
gPote
ntial
(10^
5 m
tCO
2 e
quiv
.)
Manufacturing Services Utilities Other
IndirectDirect
16
For Total Sector Economic Output
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
Ener
gy
(10^
6Ter
ajoule
s)
RCRA h
azar
dous
was
tes
gen
erat
ed(1
0^
6 m
etric
tons)
Glo
bal
War
min
gPote
ntial
(10^
5 m
tCO
2 e
quiv
.)
Ener
gy
(10^
6Ter
ajoule
s)
RCRA h
azar
dous
was
tes
gen
erat
ed(1
0^
6 m
etric
tons)
Glo
bal
War
min
gPote
ntial
(10^
5 m
tCO
2 e
quiv
.)
Ener
gy
(10^
6Ter
ajoule
s)
RCRA h
azar
dous
was
tes
gen
erat
ed(1
0^
6 m
etric
tons)
Glo
bal
War
min
gPote
ntial
(10^
5 m
tCO
2 e
quiv
.)
Ener
gy
(10^
6Ter
ajoule
s)
RCRA h
azar
dous
was
tes
gen
erat
ed(1
0^
6 m
etric
tons)
Glo
bal
War
min
gPote
ntial
(10^
5 m
tCO
2 e
quiv
.)
Manufacturing Services Utilities Other
IndirectDirect
17
Table 15.2 Fatality risk per $100 million of output.
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
Agric
ultu
re, f
ores
try a
nd fi
sher
y
Metal
min
ing
Coal
min
ing
Oil an
d ga
s ex
tract
ion
Nonm
etal
lic m
ater
ials
Cons
truct
ion
Food
and
kin
dred
pro
duct
s
Direct fatality rate per 1000 wor
Direct fatalities per $100M outp
Total fatalities per $100M outpu
18
An Automobile LCA
• Automobiles are 1/7 of GDP• Use large amounts of gasoline & materials
19
Vehicle Life Cycle
Vehicle Design &
Development
Raw Materials Sources
Vehicle Manufacture
Vehicle Use
Vehicle End-of-Life
Fuel Distribution
Service, Maintenance
Fixed Costs
Fuel Production
Primary Energy Sources
Waste Management
Scrap/ Recycle
Landfill
20
Life Cycle Assessment of a Car by Life Cycle Stage
21
1053310800 95418
1100211
413337215160676191432
0
200000
400000
600000
800000
1000000
1200000
Manufacture
Operation
Petroleum R
efining
RepairFixe
d Costs/In
surance
Vehicle Life Cycle Stage
Ener
gy U
se (M
J)SuppliersIndustry/Vehicle
Energy Use
22
274361869095921304773
73087
106848785
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
80000
Manufa
cture
Vehicle
Ope
ration
Petrole
um Refining
Repair
Fixed Cost
s/Insu
rance
Vehicle Life Cycle Stage
Gre
enho
use
Gas
Em
issi
ons
(kg
CO
2-eq
uiva
lent
/veh
icle
life
time)
SuppliersIndustry/Vehicle
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
23
Producing Electricity in Remote Locations
• 52% of electricity is produced from coal• Coal deposits are generally not close to
electricity demand• The Powder River Basin produces more
that 1/3 of U.S. coal, 350 million tons shipped by rail up to 1,500 miles
• Should PRB coal be shipped by rail?
24
Wyoming to Texas Coal Transport
25
Transporting Energy from WY to Texas: All New Infrastructure
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
Capital O&M Fuel Externalities Total
Ann
ual C
ost (
$mill
ion)
Coal by Rail Coal by Wire Coal to Gas by Pipeline Coal to Gas by Wire
Annual Cost ($millions
26
Emissions from Transporting Energy
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
SO2 CO NO2 VOC PM10 GWP(Thousands
of MT)
Emis
sion
s (M
T)
Coal by Rail Coal by Wire Coal to Gas by Pipeline Coal to Gas by Wire
27
What Is Best Mode as Scale Increases? Lessons for CA
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000Capacity (MW)
Ann
ual C
ost (
$ m
illio
n)
Coal-by-Rail Coal-by-WireCoal-to-Gas-by-Pipeline Coal-to-Gas-by-Wire
28
Evaluating Nanotechnogy’sPotential
• The ability to manipulate atoms has the potential for tremendous gains in efficiency, material strength & other properties, lowering energy & materials use, & lowering environmental discharges
• Improving environmental quality & making the economy more sustainable
29
Nanotech: Improving Catalytic Converters in Cars
30
PGM Requirement for Cat. Converters
Figure 8.2. Estimated annual PGM requirements for vehicles sold in the U.S. (excluding California)
0
50
100
150
200
250
2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030
103 k
ilogr
ams
BaselineNew emissions standards with current technologyMaximum improvement with fully effective nanotechnology
51
139
31
Estimated annual energy required to produce Platinum Group Metals with EIO-LCA & a Process Model (GaBi) for Three Scenarios
3 0
4 0
5 0
6 0
2 0 0 5 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 5 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 5 2 0 3 0
103
TJ
B a s e lin e s c e n a r io : E IO -L C A , G a B i
N e w e m is s io n s s ta n d a rd s c e n a r io : E IO -L C A , G a B i
F u lly e ffe c tiv e n a n o te c h n o lo g y s c e n a r io : E IO -L C A , G a B i
0
1 0
2 0
32
LCA for the Service Sector
• As shown above, the service sector is responsible for a large proportion of energy & materials use & discharges
• We examine whether traditional book distribution is better than E-commerce distribution
33
Current vs. E-Commerce Book Distribution
Traditional Book Distribution
E-Commerce Book Distribution
34
TABLE 9.8 Estimates of effects of traditional and e-commerce logistics, per book
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
Energy (MJ) Conventional Air Pollutants (g) RCRA Hazardous Waste (g) Greenhouse Gas Emissions(CO2 dg)
Traditional With ReturnTraditional No ReturnsE-commerce
35
Conclusion• LCA is a valuable approach for informing
decisions to improve environmental quality & sustainability
• EIO-LCA has made LCA practical. • Hybrid LCA gives as accurate an answer as
you are willing to spend time & money on• EIO-LCA sparked interest in I-O among
non-I-O professionals: 200,000 web hits• Similar models in EPA, Canada, Japan,
Netherlands, Germany, etc.
36
Making EIO-LCA Accessible
• www.eiolca.net makes the software available to everyone at no cost
• Offers 1992 & 1997 benchmark tables • More than 200,000 uses since 2001
37
An Invitation• Visit our web site: www.eiolca.net• Papers at www.gdi.ce.cmu.edu• Environmental Life Cycle Assessment
of Goods & Services: An Input-Output Approach explains the method & gives many examples of how to use it. The book will be published by Resources for the Future in December 2005.
• Fliers are available or contact me at [email protected]