+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Ectopic pregnancy in a cesarean-section scar

Ectopic pregnancy in a cesarean-section scar

Date post: 24-Nov-2016
Category:
Upload: bala
View: 216 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
2
Ectopic pregnancy in a cesarean-section scar The patient 6 weeks into an ectopic pregnancy, underwent local treatment Gary N. Frishman, MD; Katherine E. Melzer, MD; Bala Bhagavath, MD Problem: prevalence likely to rise Nontubal ectopic pregnancies remain a significant treatment challenge. Cases of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies (CSP) have increased significantly; this may be related to the growing number of cesar- ean deliveries that are being performed or to improved diagnosis. 1 No standard treatment protocol has yet been estab- lished. Adverse sequelae for both un- treated and treated CSPs include uter- ine rupture, severe hemorrhage, and hysterectomy. 2,3 A 27-year-old woman, G4P2012, had complaints of spotting and a missed pe- riod. Her history was notable for 2 cesar- ean deliveries and a dilation and curettage for a spontaneous abortion. Ultrasound imaging was suspicious for an ectopic pregnancy that was 6 weeks 3 days and lo- cated between the uterus and bladder at the site of the cesarean scar (Figure 1). Three-dimensional ultrasound imaging confirmed the extrauterine location (Fig- ure 2). Fetal cardiac activity was 120 beats per minute. The patient’s serum beta-hu- man chorionic gonadotropin level was 32,673 mIU/mL. Given the advanced presentation and lo- cation, local therapy was chosen over sys- temic treatment or a potentially difficult surgical approach. In the operating room, under transvaginal ultrasound guidance, the gestational sac was drained with a 17- gauge needle (Video clip). Methotrexate (50 mg/mL) was then instilled. The needle was subsequently used to mechanically disrupt the pregnancy. Color Doppler ul- trasound imaging was performed at base- line and at the end of the procedure to con- firm the absence of fetal cardiac activity. Ultrasound confirmation of hemostasis was documented. Blood loss was negligi- ble, and the patient recovered unevent- fully. Serum beta- human chorionic go- nadotropin levels were followed to ensure complete resolution. Given the relative rarity of CSPs, no series have evaluated the best treatment technique. As the number of cesarean deliveries increases, this condition will likely be encountered more frequently. Our case illustrates diagnosis and the feasibility of local therapy as a minimally invasive management plan. This allows fertility preservation in patients with ad- vanced CSP, especially with the presence of fetal heart tones. f From the Division of Reproductive Medicine and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI. The authors report no conflict of interest. Presented at the American Association of Gynecologic Laparascopists’ 38th Global Congress of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, Orlando, FL, Nov. 15-19, 2009. 0002-9378/$36.00 © 2012 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.03.009 VIDEO Click Supplementary Content under the article title in the online Table of Contents FIGURE 1 Ultrasound imaging indicated the presence of an ectopic pregnancy at the site of the cesarean scar. Frishman. Ectopic pregnancy in a cesarean-section scar. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012. Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies may be difficult to diagnose and may result in uterine rupture or hysterectomy. Based on location and vascularity, especially in the presence of fetal cardiac activity, local treatment with transvaginal ultrasound-guided injection of methotrexate is an excellent option which also optimizes the chance for fertility preservation. Key words: cesarean scar pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy, methotrexate Cite this article as: Frishman GN, Melzer KE, Bhagavath B. Ectopic pregnancy in a cesarean-section scar: the patient, 6 weeks into an ectopic pregnancy, underwent local treatment. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;207:238.e1-2. Surgeon’s Corner www. AJOG.org 238.e1 American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology SEPTEMBER 2012
Transcript
Page 1: Ectopic pregnancy in a cesarean-section scar

tltih

Surgeon’s Corner www.AJOG.org

Ectopic pregnancy in a cesarean-section scarThe patient �6 weeks into an ectopic pregnancy, underwent local treatment

Gary N. Frishman, MD; Katherine E. Melzer, MD; Bala Bhagavath, MD

Problem: prevalence likely to riseNontubal ectopic pregnancies remain asignificant treatment challenge. Cases ofcesarean scar ectopic pregnancies (CSP)have increased significantly; this may berelated to the growing number of cesar-ean deliveries that are being performedor to improved diagnosis.1 No standardreatment protocol has yet been estab-ished. Adverse sequelae for both un-reated and treated CSPs include uter-ne rupture, severe hemorrhage, andysterectomy.2,3

A 27-year-old woman, G4P2012, hadcomplaints of spotting and a missed pe-riod. Her history was notable for 2 cesar-ean deliveries and a dilation and curettagefor a spontaneous abortion. Ultrasoundimaging was suspicious for an ectopicpregnancy that was 6 weeks 3 days and lo-cated between the uterus and bladder atthe site of the cesarean scar (Figure 1).Three-dimensional ultrasound imagingconfirmed the extrauterine location (Fig-ure 2). Fetal cardiac activity was 120 beatsper minute. The patient’s serum beta-hu-man chorionic gonadotropin level was32,673 mIU/mL.

Giventheadvancedpresentationandlo-cation, local therapy was chosen over sys-temic treatment or a potentially difficultsurgical approach. In the operating room,

From the Division of Reproductive Medicineand Infertility, Department of Obstetrics andGynecology, Alpert Medical School, BrownUniversity, Providence, RI.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Presented at the American Association ofGynecologic Laparascopists’ 38th GlobalCongress of Minimally Invasive Gynecology,Orlando, FL, Nov. 15-19, 2009.

0002-9378/$36.00© 2012 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.03.009

VIDEOClick Supplementary Content underthe article title in the online Table ofContents

238.e1 American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecolo

under transvaginal ultrasound guidance,the gestational sac was drained with a 17-gauge needle (Video clip). Methotrexate(50 mg/mL) was then instilled. The needlewas subsequently used to mechanicallydisrupt the pregnancy. Color Doppler ul-trasound imaging was performed at base-line and at the end of the procedure to con-firm the absence of fetal cardiac activity.Ultrasound confirmation of hemostasiswas documented. Blood loss was negligi-ble, and the patient recovered unevent-fully. Serum beta- human chorionic go-

FIGURE 1

ltrasound imaging indicated the presence of anrishman. Ectopic pregnancy in a cesarean-section scar. Am J

Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies may berupture or hysterectomy. Based on location acardiac activity, local treatment with transvaginan excellent option which also optimizes the c

Key words: cesarean scar pregnancy, ecto

Cite this article as: Frishman GN, Melzer KE, Bhascar: the patient, �6 weeks into an ectopic prGynecol 2012;207:238.e1-2.

gy SEPTEMBER 2012

nadotropin levels were followed to ensurecomplete resolution.

Given the relative rarity of CSPs, noseries have evaluated the best treatmenttechnique. As the number of cesareandeliveries increases, this condition willlikely be encountered more frequently.Our case illustrates diagnosis and thefeasibility of local therapy as a minimallyinvasive management plan. This allowsfertility preservation in patients with ad-vanced CSP, especially with the presenceof fetal heart tones. f

opic pregnancy at the site of the cesarean scar.tet Gynecol 2012.

cult to diagnose and may result in uterineascularity, especially in the presence of fetalltrasound-guided injection of methotrexate isce for fertility preservation.

pregnancy, methotrexate

ath B. Ectopic pregnancy in a cesarean-sectionancy, underwent local treatment. Am J Obstet

U ectF Obs

diffind val uhan

pic

gavegn

Page 2: Ectopic pregnancy in a cesarean-section scar

www.AJOG.org Surgeon’s Corner

SEPTEMBER 2012 Americ

REFERENCES1. Rotas MA, Haberman S, Levgur M. Cesareanscar ectopic pregnancies: etiology, diagnosis,and management. Obstet Gynecol 2006;107:1373-81.2. Herman A, Weinraub Z, Avrech O, MaymonR, Ron-El R, Bukovsky Y. Follow-up and out-come of isthmic pregnancy located in a previ-ous caesarean scar. BJOG 1995;102:839-41.3. Michener C. Dickinson JE. Caesarean scarectopic pregnancy: a single centre case series.Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2009;49:451-5.

FIGURE 2

The extrauterine location of the pregnancy was clearly confirmed by 3-dimensional ultrasound imaging.Frishman. Ectopic pregnancy in a cesarean-section scar. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012.

an Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 238.e2


Recommended