Date post: | 29-Mar-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | brodie-tillotson |
View: | 212 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Fort Bend ISDFacilities Plan: Planning Area B
Community Dialogue #2December 3,4 & 5, 2013
Purpose
Data
Options
Key Dates
Purpose of tonight’s meeting:1. To review proposed options;2. Provide written input of your opinion of the options provided;3. Provide suggestions of ways to improve the options provided;4. Provide new ideas for options
IMPORTANT to remember:5. These are just options, no recommendations have been made;6. Options Do NOT suggest timelines or order of projects;7. Other options will be considered, if they consider the impact on
not just an individual school, but how that option effects others8. Options that turn into recommendations will first consider the
students and what will have the least amount of impact to their educational process
Purpose
Planning Area B
School Type
" ELEMENTARY
# MIDDLE
^ HIGH
Elementary Boundary
Middle Boundary
High Boundary
Planning Area A
Austin Parkway ES Settlers Way ES
Barrington Place ES Sugar Mill ES
Colony Bend ES Townwest ES
Colony Meadows ES Dulles MS
Commonwealth ES First Colony MS
Cornerstone ES Fort Settlement MS
Dulles ES Lake Olympia MS
Glover ES Quail Valley MS
Highlands ES Sugar Land MS
Lakeview ES Clements HS
Lantern Lane ES Dulles HS
Lexington Creek ES Elkins HS
Meadows ES Kempner HS
Palmer ES M.R. Wood
Quail Valley ES Tech Ed Center
Rita Drabek ES
Planning Area B
Boundary in multiple planning areas
DataEnrollment/Utilization & Condition:
2013/14Enrollment Capacity* Utilization Avg.
FCI
Elementary Schools 11,448 11,547 99% 19%
Middle Schools 6,202 7,362 84% 19%
High Schools 6,856 7,455 92% 23%
*Permanent Capacity Only
Planning Area B: Data
Costs Enrollment Capacity Utilization
Campus Name Const. Year Total Area FCIDeficiency +
LifecycleCurrent
2015 Projected
Permanent Current2015 Projected
Austin Parkway Elementary 1989 80,437 30% 3,892,106$ 786 718 821 96% 87%Barrington Place Elementary 1990 80,437 27% 3,804,624$ 789 735 822 96% 89%Colony Bend Elementary 1981 71,706 15% 1,500,222$ 555 467 530 105% 88%Colony Meadows Elementary 1991 81,850 23% 3,632,697$ 761 692 684 111% 101%Commonwealth Elementary 1997 78,794 24% 3,530,990$ 1,040 1,333 743 140% 179%Drabek Elementary 2001 79,706 16% 2,101,917$ 861 802 760 113% 106%Dulles Elementary 1976 88,828 26% 4,019,224$ 675 701 874 77% 80%Highlands Elementary 1986 72,465 29% 3,762,637$ 561 626 644 87% 97%Lakeview Elementary 1918 91,738 32% 5,494,918$ 556 566 616 90% 92%Lantern Lane Elementary 1978 73,865 12% 1,146,572$ 487 440 610 80% 72%Lexington Creek Elementary 1994 80,611 30% 4,223,863$ 532 505 726 73% 70%Meadows Elementary 1973 73,473 34% 4,403,474$ 433 415 469 92% 88%Palmer Elementary 1985 74,839 19% 2,375,307$ 622 655 660 94% 99%Quail Valley Elementary 2008 88,581 1% 32,944$ 559 586 644 87% 91%Settlers Way Elementary 1984 74,826 30% 3,795,542$ 763 789 731 104% 108%Sugar Mill Elementary 1984 74,864 25% 2,860,607$ 692 680 606 114% 112%Townewest Elementary 1978 72,379 37% 4,896,005$ 776 763 607 128% 126%
1,339,399 19% 55,473,648$ 11,448 11,473 11,547 99% 99%
Planning Area B: Data
Lakeview ElementaryMeadows Elementary
Quail Valley Elementary
Dulles Elementary
Townewest Elementary
Lantern Lane ElementaryColony Bend Elementary
Sugar Mill Elementary
Settlers Way Elementary
Palmer Elementary
Highlands ElementaryAustin Parkway ElementaryBarrington Place Elementary
Colony Meadows ElementaryGlover Elementary
Lexington Creek Elementary
Commonwealth Elementary
Drabek Elementary
Cornerstone Elementary
M.R. Wood
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25 1.5
FACI
LITY
CO
ND
ITIO
N IN
DEX
+ 5
YEA
R LI
FE C
YCLE
FACILITY UTILIZATION PERCENTANGE
Elementary
Major Renovation
Minor Renovation
General Maintenance
Planning Area B: DataCampus Name Const. Year Total Area FCI
Deficiency + Lifecycle
Current2015 Projected
Permanent Current2015 Projected
Dulles Middle School 1965 208,521 24% 8,881,711$ 1,218 1,352 1,780 68% 76%First Colony Middle School 1985 189,150 26% 8,586,660$ 1,247 1,308 1,198 104% 109%Fort Settlement Middle School 2001 211,280 10% 3,477,108$ 1,214 1,371 1,399 87% 98%Quail Valley Middle School 1978 176,309 28% 8,531,072$ 1,262 1,263 1,555 81% 81%Sugar Land Middle School 1975 178,650 27% 8,053,732$ 1,261 1,223 1,430 88% 86%
963,910 19% 37,530,282$ 6,202 6,517 7,362 84% 89%
Dulles Middle SchoolSugar Land Middle SchoolQuail Valley Middle School
First Colony Middle School
Lake Olympia Middle School
Fort Settlement Middle School
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
FACI
LITY
CO
ND
ITIO
N IN
DEX
+ 5
YEA
R LI
FE C
YCLE
FACILITY UTILIZATION PERCENTANGE
Middle School
Major Renovation
Minor Renovation
General Maintenance
Planning Area B: DataCosts Enrollment Capacity Utilization
Campus Name Const. Year Total Area FCIDeficiency +
LifecycleCurrent
2015 Projected
Permanent Current2015 Projected
Clements High School 1983 373,305 33% 22,081,484$ 2,502 2,442 2,621 95% 93%
Elkins High School 1992 325,389 21% 11,429,347$ 2,011 2,374 2,434 83% 98%
Kempner High School 1988 334,229 26% 14,154,277$ 2,343 2,355 2,400 98% 98%
1,032,923 23% 47,665,107$ 6,856 7,171 7,455 92% 96%
Clements High School
Kempner High School
Elkins High School
Technical Education Center
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
FACI
LITY
CO
ND
ITIO
N IN
DEX
+ 5
YEA
R LI
FE C
YCLE
FACILITY UTILIZATION PERCENTANGE
High School
Major Renovation
Minor Renovation
General Maintenance
Facility Data
Planning Area A
Lakeview ElementaryMeadows Elementary
Quail Valley Elementary
Dulles Elementary
Townewest Elementary
Lantern Lane ElementaryColony Bend Elementary
Sugar Mill Elementary
Settlers Way Elementary
Palmer Elementary
Highlands ElementaryAustin Parkway ElementaryBarrington Place Elementary
Colony Meadows ElementaryGlover Elementary
Lexington Creek Elementary
Commonwealth Elementary
Drabek Elementary
Cornerstone Elementary
M.R. Wood
Dulles Middle SchoolSugar Land Middle SchoolQuail Valley Middle School
First Colony Middle School
Lake Olympia Middle School
Fort Settlement Middle School
Dulles High School
Clements High School
Kempner High School
Elkins High School
Technical Education Center
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25 1.5
FACI
LITY
CO
ND
ITIO
N IN
DEX
+ 5
YEA
R L
IFE
CYCL
E
FACILITY UTILIZATION PERCENTANGE
Major Renovation
Minor Renovation
General Maintenance
Live/Attend Analysis
Austi
n
Bush
Clem
ents
Dulle
s
Elkin
s
High
tow
er
Kem
pner
Mar
shall
Ridg
e Poi
nt
Trav
is
Willo
wrid
ge
Fern
dell H
enry
Ce
nter
Fort
Bend
Co.
Al
tern
ative
M.R
. Woo
d Ce
nter
for
Lear
ning
Live I
n
Live &
Atte
nd
Tran
sfer
Out
Tran
sfer
Out
%
Austin 2,219 7 25 18 7 29 5 17 1 1 2,329 2,219 110 5%Bush 8 1,915 11 12 13 52 4 3 2 59 1 10 2,090 1,915 175 8%Clements 2 2,136 26 14 18 3 2 1 2 2,204 2,136 68 3%Dulles 4 30 1,822 10 39 9 3 5 2 2 2 1,928 1,822 106 5%Elkins 6 116 60 1,873 173 10 46 2 2 6 2 2,296 1,873 423 18%Hightower 3 2 11 20 1,545 3 48 6 3 1,641 1,545 96 6%Kempner 13 13 97 79 7 53 2,293 4 11 7 2,577 2,293 284 11%Marshall 3 11 9 32 18 113 1 1,170 41 3 12 1 10 1,424 1,170 254 18%Ridge Point 1 25 17 24 94 1 1,653 2 4 2 1,823 1,653 170 9%Travis 5 54 30 16 7 53 10 2 2,313 2 3 2,495 2,313 182 7%Willowridge 1 7 10 40 14 108 1 81 65 2 1,253 8 2 1,592 1,253 339 21%Unmatched 6 3 3 5 1 5 12 4 6 6 1Out-of-District 17 26 11 78 1 12 11 26 7 19 5 1Attends 2,274 2,047 2,505 2,214 2,013 2,290 2,339 1,318 1,873 2,435 1,280 26 16 35Live & Attend 2,219 1,915 2,136 1,822 1,873 1,545 2,293 1,170 1,653 2,313 1,253Transfer In 55 132 369 392 140 745 46 148 220 122 27Transfer In % 2% 6% 15% 18% 7% 33% 2% 11% 12% 5% 2%
2013-14 9-12 Live/Attend
Attends
Lives
In
Options Packet
Current/Projected Data
Option Description
Option DataDescription
School within a School ConceptConcept:• Smaller Schools that share site and/or spaces• Create Flexibility of Delivery (time, grade configuration, etc...)• Allow for more capacity without feeling like student is in a large
school• Shared Resources
Facility Issues
• Townewest is over-utilized
• Meadows & Townewest have
high FCIs relative to other FBISD
facilities
B.E.1—Barrington Place, Meadows, Townewest
Current Information Costs Current
Campus NameConst. Year
Square Footage FCI
Deficiency + Lifecycle
2013 Current
2015 Projected
Permanent Capacity
2013 Current
2015 Projected
Barrington Place Elementary 1990 80,437 27% 3,804,624$ 789 735 822 96% 89%Meadows Elementary 1973 73,473 34% 4,403,474$ 433 415 469 92% 88%Townewest Elementary 1978 72,379 37% 4,896,005$ 776 763 607 128% 126%
226,289 27% 13,104,103$ 1,998 1,913 1,898 105% 101%
UtilizationEnrollment
Option 1
• Deficiency and Life Cycle
Investment into existing facilities.
B.E.1—Barrington Place, Meadows, Townewest
Option 2
• Rebuild Townewest at capacity
larger than the current capacity
to the District prototype of 850
students.
+ low cost
- Townewest remains
over-utilized
Strengths & Challenges
+ Relieves over-crowding
- Higher capital
investment
- Swing space during
construction
Facility Issues
• Commonwealth is over-utilized
• Austin Parkway & Commonwealth have
high FCIs relative to other FBISD facilities
• Colony Meadows (B.E.3.) is over-utilized
and can be provided relief from
Commonwealth once New ES is built in
Riverstone
B.E.2—Austin Parkway, Commonwealth, Settlers Way
Current Information Costs Current
Campus NameConst. Year
Square Footage FCI
Deficiency + Lifecycle
2013 Current
2015 Projected
Permanent Capacity
2013 Current
2015 Projected
Austin Parkway Elementary 1989 80,437 30% 3,892,106$ 786 718 821 96% 87%Commonwealth Elementary 1997 78,794 24% 3,530,990$ 1,040 1,333 743 140% 179%Settlers Way Elementary 1984 74,826 30% 3,795,542$ 763 789 731 104% 108%
234,057 22% 11,218,637$ 2,589 2,840 2,295 113% 124%
Enrollment Utilization
Option 1
• Deficiency and Life Cycle Investments into existing schools
• Renovations at Austin Parkway & Commonwealth
• Build 1,200 Capacity ES at Riverstone site
• Relieve utilization at Commonwealth with Rezone to new ES
• Possible (TBD) relief for Colony Meadows into
Commonwealth
Option 2
• Deficiency and Life Cycle Investment
• Renovations at Austin Parkway & Commonwealth
• Build New ES at Riverstone site (850 prototype)
• Relieve utilization at Commonwealth with rezone to new ES
at Riverstone
+ reduces area over-crowding
- Rezoning required
- Shared School Site may be a new concept to the
Community
- Site logistics
- Commonwealth ES may not be relieved enough to
handle future relief for other elementary schools
Strengths & Challenges
+ reduces area over-crowding
- Rezoning required
- Does not provide relief to Settlers Way ES
- May not provide enough seats for the long-
term
B.E.2—Austin Parkway, Commonwealth, Settlers Way
Current Information Costs Current
Campus NameConst. Year
Square Footage FCI
Deficiency + Lifecycle
2013 Current
2015 Projected
Permanent Capacity
2013 Current
2015 Projected
Colony Bend Elementary 1981 71,706 15% 1,500,222$ 555 467 530 105% 88%Colony Meadows Elementary 1991 81,850 23% 3,632,697$ 761 692 684 111% 101%
153,556 15% 5,132,919$ 1,316 1,159 1,214 108% 95%
UtilizationEnrollment
Facility Issues
• Colony Meadows is over-utilized and will be
more over-utilized with addition of new
apartments currently being built by
boundary
• Colony Bend has approximately 225 students
that transfer into the boundary.
B.E.3—Colony Bend, Colony Meadows
Option 1
• Deficiency and Life Cycle Investment
• Relief for Colony Meadows by rezoning to
other area schools
Option 2
• Deficiency and Life Cycle Investment
• In anticipation of new apartments
currently being developed near Costco,
rezone to an area elementary that can
accommodate an additional approx. 100
students
+ reduces area over-crowding
+can provide a more consistent feeder pattern for this area
- Rezoning required
- Area remains at/near capacity
- Determining which school will provide best option for rezoning
Strengths & Challenges
+ reduces area over-crowding
- Finding location for Pre-K program
- Area remains at/near capacity
- Does not provide for feeder pattern
consistency
B.E.3 (1/2)—Colony Bend, Colony Meadows
Option 4
• Combination of the Above Options
Strengths & Challenges
+ reduces area over-crowding
- Rezoning required
- Area remains at/near capacity
B.E.3 (1/2)—Colony Bend, Colony Meadows
Option 3
• Deficiency and Life Cycle Investment
• Rezone apartments at Lexington & Austin
into Colony Bend boundary
+ reduces utilization at Colony Meadows
+ keeps students in current feeder pattern
- Rezoning required
- Transfer students at Colony Bend ES
- Creating boundary change with least
impact on current students
Facility Issues
• Anticipated increased
utilization at Lantern Lane ES
with the current construction
of apartments in the boundary
B.E.4—Lantern Lane, Palmer, Quail Valley
Current Information Costs Current
Campus NameConst. Year
Square Footage
FCIDeficiency +
Lifecycle2013
Current2015
ProjectedPermanent
Capacity2013
Current2015
ProjectedLantern Lane Elementary 1978 73,865 12% 1,146,572$ 487 440 610 80% 72%Palmer Elementary 1985 74,839 19% 2,375,307$ 622 655 660 94% 99%Quail Valley Elementary 2008 88,581 1% 32,944$ 559 586 644 87% 91%
237,285 7% 3,554,822$ 1,668 1,681 1,914 87% 88%
Enrollment Utilization
Option 1
• Deficiency and Life Cycle
Investment
• 10 classroom addition to
Lantern Lane
+ will accommodate
growth
- Additional capital
investment
Strengths & Challenges
B.E.4—Lantern Lane, Palmer, Quail Valley
Facility Issues
• Drabek and Sugar Mill over-
utilized
• Lakeview is a historic facility
B.E.5—Drabek, Lakeview, Sugar Mill
Current Information Costs Current
Campus NameConst. Year
Square Footage
FCIDeficiency +
Lifecycle2013
Current2015
ProjectedPermanent
Capacity2013
Current2015
ProjectedDrabek Elementary 2001 79,706 16% 2,101,917$ 861 802 760 113% 106%Lakeview Elementary 1918 91,738 32% 5,494,918$ 556 566 616 90% 92%Sugar Mill Elementary 1984 74,864 25% 2,860,607$ 692 680 606 114% 112%
246,308 19% 10,457,443$ 2,109 2,048 1,982 106% 103%
Enrollment Utilization
Option 1
• Deficiency and Life Cycle Investment
• Selective Replacement, Historic Renovations
and Additions to Lakeview
• Rezone Sugar Mill to Lakeview
• Rezone Drabek to New Townewest (B.E.1)
+ Reduces over-crowding at Drabek
and Sugar Mill
- Rezoning required
- Leaves area at capacity
Strengths & Challenges
B.E.5—Drabek, Lakeview, Sugar Mill
Option 2
• Deficiency and Life Cycle Investment
• Selective Replacement, Historic Renovations
and Additions to Lakeview
• Build 4 CR Addition to Sugar Mill
+ Reduces over-crowding at Sugar
Mill
- Does not provide relief for Drabek
Facility Issues
• Dulles ES is a relatively old
facility in FBISD
B.E.6—Dulles, Highlands, Lexington Creek
Current Information Costs Current
Campus NameConst. Year
Square Footage
FCIDeficiency +
Lifecycle2013
Current2015
ProjectedPermanent
Capacity2013
Current2015
Projected
Dulles Elementary 1976 88,828 26% 4,019,224$ 675 701 874 77% 80%Highlands Elementary 1986 72,465 29% 3,762,637$ 561 626 644 87% 97%Lexington Creek Elementary 1994 80,611 30% 4,223,863$ 532 505 726 73% 70%
241,904 23% 12,005,725$ 1,768 1,832 2,244 79% 82%
Enrollment Utilization
Option 1
• Renovations to Dulles,
Highlands, & Lexington Creek
+ Updates current facilities
Strengths & Challenges
B.E.6—Dulles, Highlands, Lexington Creek
Facility Issues
• First Colony MS is
overcrowded
B.M.1—Dulles, First Colony, Fort Settlement, Quail Valley, Sugar Land
Current Information Costs Current
Campus NameConst. Year Square Footage FCI
Deficiency + Lifecycle
2013 Current
2015 Projected
Permanent Capacity
2013 Current
2015 Projected
Dulles Middle School 1965 208,521 24% 8,881,711$ 1,218 1,352 1,780 68% 76%First Colony Middle School 1985 189,150 26% 8,586,660$ 1,247 1,308 1,198 104% 109%Fort Settlement Middle School 2001 211,280 10% 3,477,108$ 1,214 1,371 1,399 87% 98%Quail Valley Middle School 1978 176,309 28% 8,531,072$ 1,262 1,263 1,555 81% 81%Sugar Land Middle School 1975 178,650 27% 8,053,732$ 1,261 1,223 1,430 88% 86%
963,910 19% 37,530,282$ 6,202 6,517 7,362 84% 89%
Enrollment Utilization
Option 1
• Deficiency and Life Cycle Investment
• Addition at First Colony MS
+ Reduces over-crowding
Strengths & Challenges
B.M.1—Dulles, First Colony, Fort Settlement, Quail Valley, Sugar Land
Option 2
• Deficiency and Life Cycle Investment
• Rezone area middle schools
• Repurpose Lake Olympia Facility for
Transportation & Service Center
+ Cleans feeder into Ridge Point
HS
+ Reduces operational costs
- Repurposing Lake Olympia
- Rezoning
Facility Issues
• Enrollment at Elkins HS is projected to
increase due to population growth in
the Riverstone subdivision
• Current Clements 9-12th grade live-in is:
1,968
• Current Clements 7-10th grade live-in is
1,807
B.H.1—Clements, Elkins, Kempner
Current Information Costs Current
Campus NameConst. Year Square Footage FCI
Deficiency + Lifecycle
2013 Current
2015 Projected
Permanent Capacity
2013 Current
2015 Projected
Clements High School 1983 373,305 33% 22,081,484$ 2,502 2,442 2,621 95% 93%Elkins High School 1992 325,389 21% 11,429,347$ 2,011 2,374 2,434 83% 98%Kempner High School 1988 334,229 26% 14,154,277$ 2,343 2,355 2,400 98% 98%
1,032,923 23% 47,665,107$ 6,856 7,171 7,455 92% 96%
Enrollment Utilization
Option 1
• Deficiency and Life Cycle Investment
• Monitor Clements Live-in Enrollment
• Consider moving World Languages Academy
when neighborhood population approaches
capacity of the facility
+ Renovates current facilities
- Possible movement of a
program to another high school
facility in time
Strengths & Challenges
B.H.1—Clements, Elkins, Kempner
Option 2
• Deficiency and Life Cycle Investment
• Rezone Cornerstone ES feeder into Austin HS
to relieve future utilization at Kempner HS
+ See packet A.H.1
- See packet A.H.1
Questionnaire
Individual Questionnaire1. For each option- Evaluate Independently 2. Select (when applicable) your preferred option3. If you have a suggested option that is not listed please explain in
space provided
Group Questionnaire:4. Goal is to reach consensus- may not occur5. Table facilitator will record group responses6. Please allow all to contribute to the conversation
Process Timeline Update
Key Meeting Dates:
December 4th & 5th - 2nd Community Dialogues
December 16th - Board of Trustees Work Session
December 17th/18th- Recommendations work sessions
January- Steering Committee Recommendations Meetings
January – Board of Trustees Workshop (TBD)
February - Facility Plan Deliverable
Questionnaire
ONLINE QUESTIONNAIRE OPTION