+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Editor in chiefeshgid.com/images/2018June1052PM_15963555.pdf · When combined sensitivity of both...

Editor in chiefeshgid.com/images/2018June1052PM_15963555.pdf · When combined sensitivity of both...

Date post: 21-Oct-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
34
Transcript
  • Editor in chief

    M.Y.Taher

    Founder Editors

    Hilmy Abaza

    Seham Abdel Reheem

    Co-Editors

    Ahmed Shawky

    FathAlla Sidkey

    Maher Osman

    Mohamed Sharaf De Din

    International Advisory Board

    JP Galmiche France

    A Sandeberg Sweden

    X Rogiers Belgium

    S Jensen Denmark

    Des Verrannes France

    Antonio Ascione Italy

    S Brauno Italy

    P Almasio Italy

    National Advisory Board

    Moustafa El Henawi

    Amira Shams Eldin

    Nabil Abdel Baki

    Hoda E-Aggan

    M Essam Moussa

    Ahmed Bassioni

    Saeid Elkyal

    Abdel Fataah Hano

    Khaled Madboli

    Ezzat Aly

    Contents Alexandria Journal of Hepatogastroenterology, Volume IVX ( II ), August 2014

    ------------------------------------------- Manuscript Submission: For information and to submit

    manuscripts please contact the editors by e-mail at :

    [email protected]

    [email protected]

    Disclaimer: The Publisher, the Egyptian Society of

    Hepatology Gastroenterology and Infectious Diseases in

    Alexandria, and Editors cannot be held responsible for errors

    or any consequences arising from the use of information

    contained in this journal; the views and opinions expressed

    do not necessarily reflect the those of the Publisher, The

    Egyptian Society of Hepatology Gastroenterology &

    Infectious Diseases in Alexandria, Editors, neither dose the

    publication of advertisements constitute any endorsement by

    the Publisher, society, and editors of the products advertised.

    Original Article:

    Serum Squamous Cell Carcinoma Antigen Level in

    Cirrhotic Chronic Hepatitis C Patients with and without

    Hepatocellular Carcinoma

    Alaa El Din Mohamed Abdo1; Akram Abd El-Moneim

    Deghady2; Essam El Din Saeed Bedewy1 and Walid Ismail

    Ellakany1 1Tropical Medicine Department; Clinical and 2Chemical

    Pathology Department

    ------------------------------------------- Original Article:

    Standard Endoscopy, Narrow-Band Imaging and

    Histopathology in the Diagnosis of Gastro-Esophageal

    Reflux Disease

    Mohammed M. Shamseya1 and Ayman M. Shamseya2 1Department of Clinical and Experimental Internal Medicine;

    Medical Research Institute, 2Department of Internal Medicine;

    Faculty of Medicine; University of Alexandria.

    ------------------------------------------- Original Article:

    Study of The Efficacy of Flumazenil Therapy in Different

    Clinical Stages of Hepatic Encephalopathy

    El Hasafy Youssef Ma*, Hassouna Moustafa Ea, Rady Refaat Ab* a* Internal Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine,

    Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt. b* Neuropsychiatry Department, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria

    University, Alexandria, Egypt.

    ------------------------------------------- Original Article:

    Suppression of The Inflammatory Cascade and Oxidative

    Stress in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Tumor Bearing Mice:

    Effect of Combination of Curcumin, Leflunomide and

    Perindopril

    Magda Nasr a, Eman Selima a, Omar Hamed b, Amany Kazem c a Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics,

    Medical Research Institute, Alexandria University, 165 Horreya

    Avenue, Alexandria, Egypt b Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of

    Pharmacy, Pharos University, Alexandria, Egypt c Department of Pathology, Medical Research Institute,

    Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt

    -------------------------------------------

    2

    6

    13

    20

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]

  • Original Article

    Serum Squamous Cell Carcinoma Antigen Level in Cirrhotic Chronic Hepatitis

    C Patients with and without Hepatocellular Carcinoma

    Alaa El Din Mohamed Abdo1; Akram Abd El-Moneim Deghady2; Essam El Din Saeed Bedewy1 and Walid Ismail

    Ellakany1 1Tropical Medicine Department; Clinical and 2Chemical Pathology Department

    ABSTRACT

    This study will be carried out on 50 personnel divided into five groups : Group A: 10 cases of hepatocellular carcinoma

    without interventions. Group B: 10 cases of hepatocellular carcinoma before and 3 months after successful

    interventions.Group C: 10 cases of established cirrhosis. Group D: 10 cases with chronic hepatitis C virus infection

    without established cirrhosis. Group E: 10 healthy individuals as controls. Patients and Methods: Sera from selected

    patients and controls were used for estimation of SCC-Ag using CanAg SCC EIA. Results: high significant increase in

    serum SCCA level in patients with HCC (groupA and groupB) when compared to cirrhotic,chronic HCV and control

    groups (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Positive significant correlation was found between AFP and serum SCCA level .The

    best cut-off value to differentiate HCC patients from cirrhotic patients was 3.2 ng/ml for SCCA yielded with 80%

    sensitivity and 90% specificity. When combined sensitivity of both markers were calculated in our study at the best-

    chosen cutoff values (SCCA 3.2 ng/ml and AFP 200 ng/ml) sensitivity improved to 93%.

    Introduction

    Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a primary

    malignancy of the liver. HCC is the fifth most

    common malignancy in the world and the third

    most common cause of cancer related deaths

    worldwide. It is a major health problem in Egypt

    with the incidence expected to rise continuously

    in the next decade.(1,2). The diagnosis of liver

    cancer depends on both screening with alpha-

    fetoprotein (AFP) and radiological imaging

    studies. Generally, normal levels of AFP are

    below 10 ng/ml but AFP greater than 200 ng/ml is

    suggestive of HCC . The sensitivity of AFP for

    liver cancer is about 67 % ; therefore a normal

    AFP does not exclude HCC. Searching another

    tumor marker, that together with AFP could

    improve the diagnostic utility of HCC.(3).

    Squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCCA), a

    member of the high molecular weight family of

    serine protease inhibitors named serpins which are

    physiologically found in the spinous and granular

    layers of normal squamous epithelium but

    typically expressed by neoplastic cells of

    epithelial origin in a number of different cancers

    such as those of the cervix, lung, and head and

    neck and so can be used as a clinical marker of

    these malignancies.(4). Recently much attention

    has been focused on the role of SCCA in HCV

    cirrhotic patients suggesting that high levels of

    SCCA can assess HCC development.(5). The aim

    of this study was to assess the serum level of

    squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCCA) in

    cirrhotic chronic HCV patients with and without

    hepatocellular carcinoma in relation to alfa feto

    protein (AFP).

    Aim of the work

    The aim of this study was to assess the serum

    level of squamous cell carcinoma antigen

    (SCCA) in cirrhotic chronic HCV patients with

    hepatocellular carcinoma in relation to alfa feto

    protein (AFP) .

    Patients and Methods

    These groups was from both sexes who are

    admitted to the inpatient ward and the outpatient

    clinic of Tropical Medicine Department, Faculty

    of Medicine, Alexandria University. This study

    was carried out on : Group A: 10 cases of

  • hepatocellular carcinoma without interventions.

    Group B: 10 cases of hepatocellular carcinoma

    before and 3 months after successful

    interventions. Group C: 10 cases of established

    cirrhosis. Group D: 10 cases with chronic

    hepatitis C virus infection without established

    cirrhosis. Group E: 10 healthy individuals as

    controls. All patients in this study were subjected

    to: complete blood picture, liver biochemical

    profile serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT),

    serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST), serum

    alkaline phosphatase, total and direct serum

    bilirubin, prothrombin time and activity, serum

    albumin blood urea nitrogen(BUN), serum

    creatinine. Fasting blood sugar. Serum alpha

    fetoprotein (AFP). Determination of squamous

    cell carcinoma antigen (SCC-Ag) Sera from

    selected patients and controls were used for

    estimation of SCC-Ag using CanAg SCC EIA.

    The CanAg SCC EIA is a solid phase, non-

    competitive immunoassay based upon the direct

    sandwich technique. Calibrators and patient

    samples are incubated together with biotinylated

    Anti-SCC monoclonal antibody in Streptavidin

    coated microstrips. After washing buffered

    Substrate/Chromogen reagent (hydrogen peroxide

    and 3, 3', 5, 5' tetra-methylbenzidine) is added to

    each well and the enzyme reaction is allowed to

    proceed. During the enzyme reaction a blue

    colour will develop if antigen is present. The

    intensity of the colour is proportional to the

    amount of SCC present in the samples. The colour

    intensity is determined in a microplate

    spectrophotometer at 620 nm (or optionally at 405

    nm after addition of Stop Solution). Calibration

    curves are constructed for each calibrator. The

    SCC concentrations of patient samples are the

    read from the calibration curve.

    Results

    Table (1) shows a statistical significant difference

    between different studied groups regarding alpha

    feto protein (P= 0.000).

    Table (1): Comparison between different studied groups regarding alpha feto protein

    Mean Std. Deviation Minimum Maximum

    Gp. A 263.0 96.02 150. 438

    Gp. B 209.4 64.7 145. 380.

    Gp. C 154.5 48.16 75. 210.

    Gp. D 7 1.82574 5 9

    Gp. E 1.22 0.27406 0.8 1.6

    F

    P

    38.208

    0.000*

    Table (2) shows a statistical significant difference between different studied groups regarding SCCA level

    (P= 0.000).

    Table (2): Comparison between different studied groups regarding SCCA score.

    Mean Std. Deviation Minimum Maximum

    Gp. A 5.53 2.16 2.5 10.

    Gp. B 5.3 1.5 3.3 7.6

    Gp. C 3.3 1.6 1.2 5.6

    Gp. D 0.824 0.15897 0.6 1.05

    Gp. E 0.646 0.23172 0.3 0.95

    F

    P

    28.897

    0.000*

    Also, Positive significant correlation was found between AFP and SCCA in both groups

  • Table (3): Correlation between AFP and SCCA

    AFP

    HCC without

    intervention

    HCC with

    intervention

    SCCA r 0.629* 0.525*

    p

  • References

    1. Lok A, Seeff L, Morgan T. Incidence of

    hepatocellular carcinoma and associated risk

    factors in hepatitis C related advanced liver

    disease.Gastroenterology 2009; 136 :138-48.

    2. El-Zayadi A, Badran H. Hepatocellular

    carcinoma in Egypt: a single center study over a

    decade. World J Gastroenterol 2005; 11:5193–8.

    3. Peng SY, Chen WJ, Lai PL , et al. High

    alpha-fetoprotein level correlates with high stage,

    early recurrence and poor prognosis of

    hepatocellular carcinoma: significance of hepatitis

    virus infection, age, p53 and beta-catenin

    mutations: Int J Cancer 2004; 112:44-50.

    4. Giannelli G , Antonaci S.New frontiers in

    biomarkers for hepatocellular carcinoma: Dig

    Liver Disease; 2011; 38:854-9.

    5. Biasiolo A, Chemello L, Quarta S. Squamous

    cell carcinoma antigen (SCCA) detection in

    patients with HCV infection and rheumatoid

    factor seropositivity. J Viral Hepat 2008;15:246-9.

    6. Issa H, Awadallah A, Soliman M.

    Evaluation of Serum Chromogranin A as a Useful

    Tumor Marker for Diagnosis of Hepatocellular

    Carcinoma. Journal of American Science 2011; 7:

    999-1007.

    7. Feng W, Zhi-Biao W, WenChen M, et al.

    Extracorporeal High Intensity Focused Ultrasound

    Ablation in the Treatment of Patients with Large

    Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Surgical Onco 2004;

    11:1061-69.

    8. Molinari M, Kachuray J, Dixonz E, Suehiro

    Y, Morioka H, Fordtran B et al. Transarterial

    Chemoembolisation for Advanced Hepatocellular

    Carcinoma: Results from a North American

    Cancer Centre. Clinical Oncology 2006; 18: 684-

    92.

    9. Hussein M, Ibrahim A, Abdella H.

    Evaluation of serum squamous cell carcinoma

    antigen as a novel biomarker for diagnosis of

    hepatocellular carcinoma in Egyptian patients.

    Indian J Cancer 2008; 45:167-72.

    10. El Ezawy H, Shebil N, Mounis A.

    Assessment of serum SCCA and KL-6 as tumor

    markers and their correlation with tumor size.

    Journal of American science 2012; 8:172-9.

    11. Bin X, Gansheng F, Shihua L, Kim T,

    Takahashi S. SCCA level in Peripheral Blood in

    Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Before

    and after TACE. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technol

    2008; 28:645- 8.

    12. Trevisani F, Daniela B, Gianluca F. Serum

    SCCA as a predictor of hepatocellular carcinoma

    in patients with liver cirrhosis. Open Journal of

    Gastroenterology 2012; 2:56-61.

  • Original Article

    Standard Endoscopy, Narrow-Band Imaging and Histopathology in the

    Diagnosis of Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease Mohammed M. Shamseya1 and Ayman M. Shamseya2 1Department of Clinical and Experimental Internal Medicine; Medical Research Institute, 2Department of Internal

    Medicine; Faculty of Medicine; University of Alexandria.

    ABSTRACT

    Background: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is caused by the reflux of gastric contents into the esophagus.

    The diagnosis of GERD is based on the combination of clinical symptoms, endoscopic findings and histological

    changes. Narrow band imaging (NBI) endoscopic modality facilitates mucosal surface evaluation and may improve the

    endoscopic diagnosis of GERD. Aim of the work: In this study we aimed to show the difference between standard

    white light endoscopy and the NBI technique in squamo-columnar junction evaluation of patients with GERD and

    compare it with mucosal hitopathological findings. Patients and Methods: A total of 60 subjects were recruited; 40

    with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) and 20 with erosive reflux disease (ERD). Patients were subjected to

    esophagogastroduodenoscopy (standard white light endoscopy and NBI). In all of them, two mucosal biopsies were

    taken 2 cm above the esophagogastric junction for histopathological evaluation (inflammation versus normal mucosa).

    Results: NBI was more sensitive than standard white light endoscopy in distinguishing abnormal endoscopic findings.

    Histopathological findings were more prevalent than the mucosal changes diagnosed by the standard white light

    endoscopy and NBI. Conclusion: NBI is more sensitive than white light endoscopy in detecting inflammation in NERD

    patients. However, histopathological evaluation is the most sensitive; therefore taking a biopsy remains useful in

    diagnosing GERD.

    Introduction

    Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a

    complex disorder caused by the reflux of gastric

    contents into the esophagus either with or without

    complications (1). Although GERD is widely

    reported to be one of the most prevalent diseases

    of the gastrointestinal tract, prevalence data is

    based primarily on estimates rather than actual

    data (2). The incidence of GERD is 10–20% in

    Western countries, while in Asia it is about 5% (3-

    6). There is no gold standard method for the

    diagnosis of GERD (7). Upper gastrointestinal

    endoscopy is the standard diagnostic tool for

    evaluation and grading of esophagitis and

    excluding other esophageal diseases (8). The

    sensitivity of endoscopy for GERD is poor, but it

    has an excellent specificity of 90% to 95% (8,9).

    Reflux esophagitis is defined endoscopically by

    the presence of mucosal breaks in the esophagus,

    which are the most reliable endoscopic indicators

    of reflux esophagitis (9-11). Most patients have no

    visible mucosal damage at the time of endoscopy,

    referred to as non-erosive GERD, whereas others

    have esophagitis, peptic strictures, or Barrett’s

    esophagus (12). Narrow band imaging (NBI) is a

    novel high resolution endoscopic imaging

    technique in which the spectral bandwidth of

    filtered light is narrowed(11). In this imaging

    technique, blue light with the short wavelength

    results in more superficial penetration to the

    mucosal surface (11-15). Narrow-band illumination

    can enhance the contrast between the esophageal

    mucosa and the gastric mucosa. In patients with

    GERD, NBI endoscopy may help to improve

    diagnostic accuracy compared to conventional

    endoscopy(16,17). Narrow band imaging (NBI)

    endoscopy system enhances visualization of

    microvasculature and mucosal patterns.

    Histological abnormalities have been well-defined

    for GERD (18). Histology may, therefore, be

    considered a diagnostic tool for non-erosive reflux

    disease (NERD) by examining simple esophageal

    biopsies during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (19).

    Aim of the work:

    In this study we aimed to demonstrate the

    difference between standard white light

    endoscopy and the NBI technique in squamo-

    columnar junction evaluation of patients with

    GERD and compare it with mucosal

    histopathological findings.

  • Patients and Methods

    The study was undertaken at the Hepatology &

    Gastrointestinal endoscopy Unit, Medical

    Research Institute, & GIT Unit, Faculty of

    Medicine, Alexandria University, during the

    period from June 2012 to October 2013. The

    study was carried out with the approval of the

    Medical Research Institute Ethical Committee. A

    total of 60 patients with GERD symptoms were

    enrolled. Typical GERD symptoms were defined

    as at least three episodes of regurgitation and/ or

    heartburn per week. Patients who were on

    continuous treatment with acid suppression in the

    preceding four weeks before endoscopy, who had

    undergone previous upper gastrointestinal surgery

    such as gastrectomy, fundoplication or distal

    esophagectomy, along with those who had had

    severe gastroparesis or esophageal varices were

    excluded from the study. The distal esophagus

    was initially examined by standard white light

    endoscopy. Of the sixty patients 40 proved to

    have NERD, while the remaining 20 had erosive

    reflux disease (ERD). During upper

    gastrointestinal endoscopy, the distal 5 cm of the

    esophagus mucosal morphology at the squamo-

    columnar junction were then visualized by NBI

    system using video endoscopes (GIF-H260;

    Olympus), video processor (Evis Lucera CV 260

    SL; Olympus). During standard white-light

    endoscopy and NBI examination erosions,

    mucosal breaks and other complications were

    graded according to the Los Angeles

    classification.(13) We considered the following

    index lesions as acid related mucosal changes:

    mucosal breaks under standard white-light

    endoscopy and mucosal brownish areas under

    NBI. Two mucosal biopsies were taken 2 cm

    above the esophagogastric junction with Olympus

    biopsy forceps. The biopsies were preserved in

    10% formalin and transferred for routine

    pathology evaluation within 24 hours. The

    specimens were visually oriented with slight

    magnification during embedding in the paraffin

    wax blocks before hardening to ensure vertical

    cutting. They were cut and finally stained with

    haematoxylin and eosin. Histological esophagitis

    was identified by basal cell hyperplasia over

    0.15%, increased papillary length over 0.66%, and

    infiltration by leukocytes/eosinophils. Apart from

    the routine histological reporting, we also

    requested a comment on the presence or absence

    of inflammation. We termed all histological

    differentiations (infiltration with neutrophils and

    eosinophils, elongated papillae, and basal zone

    thickening) as inflammation.

    Results

    The mean value for age of the enrolled patients

    was 37.5 ±12.3 years. Gender distribution was:

    males 18 (30%); females 42 (70%). The mean age

    of males was 38.1 ±16.2 years and that of females

    33.7 ±12.7 years (Table 1).

    Table (1): Demographic data

    Number Percent

    Sex

    Males 18 30.0

    Females 42 70.0

    Mean Standard deviation

    Age (years)

    Males 38.1 ± 16.2

    Females 33.7 ± 12.7

    Among the 60 symptomatic GERD patients,

    examination of the squamo-columnar junction and

    esophageal mucosa were defined as normal in 40

    cases with standard white-light endoscopy,

    whereas NBI guided endoscopic examination

    revealed normal mucosal findings in 28 cases

    only. NBI was more sensitive than standard

    white-light endoscopy in distinguishing abnormal

    endoscopic findings (p

  • Table (2): Endoscopic findings in standard white-light endoscopy and narrow band imaging

    Endoscopic

    findings

    Standard white-light endoscopy NBI P

    Males (n) Females (n) Males (n) Females (n)

    Normal 10 30 5 23 0.004*

    Esophagitis

    (Grade-A) 3 5 7 11 0.003*

    Esophagitis

    (Grade-B) 2 4 3 5 >0.05

    Esophagitis

    (Grade-C) 2 2 2 2 > 0.05

    Esophagitis

    (Grade-D) 1 1 1 1 > 0.05

    NBI = narrow-band imaging, n = number, Endoscopic findings according to the Los Angeles classification, p

    value for comparing between the studied groups, *:statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05.

    Figure 1: Standard white-light endoscopic picture of squamo-columnar junction showing GERD Los

    Angeles class A

  • Figure 2: Standard white-light endoscopic picture of squamo-columnar junction showing GERD Los Angeles

    class B

    Figure 3: Standard white-light endoscopic picture of squamo-columnar junction showing GERD Los Angeles

    class C

  • Figure 4: Narrow Band Imaging (NBI) of squamo-columnar junction showing GERD Los Angeles class A

    Normal histopathological findings were observed

    only in 17 of the 40 patients who had normal

    esophageal mucosa by white-light endoscopy and

    17 of the 28 patients who had normal endoscopic

    findings with NBI. The histology was abnormal in

    all patients with erosive esophagitis that were

    diagnosed with standard white-light endoscopy

    and NBI (Tables 3,4).

    Table (3): Comparison between standard light endoscopy and histopathological findings

    Standard light

    endoscopy (n=60)

    Histopathological

    findings (n=60)

    P

    Normal esophageal mucosa 40 17/40 < 0.001*

    Endoscopic esophagitis 20 20 >0.05

    n = number, p value for comparing between the studied groups, *:statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05.

    Table (4): Comparison between narrow band imaging endoscopy (NBI) and histopathological findings

    Narrow Band Imaging

    (n=60)

    Histopathological

    findings (n=60)

    P

    Normal esophageal mucosa 28 17/28 0.008*

    Endoscopic esophagitis 32 32 >0.05

    n = number, p value for comparing between the studied groups, *:statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05.

    Discussion

    GERD is a common disorder that encompasses a

    variety of clinical conditions, like regurgitation

    and/ or heartburn. Endoscopically, it is classified

    into erosive (ERD) and non-erosive (NERD)

    subtypes (20). According to population-based

    studies, it is estimated that NERD accounts for up

    to 60% of patients with GERD (1,21). Endoscopy is

    the gold standard for the diagnosis of erosive

    GERD (8), and up to 40% of patients with GERD

    have positive upper gastro-intestinal endoscopy

    findings with standard white-light endoscopy (22).

    The Los Angeles classification system is based on

    the detection of mucosal breaks in conventional

    endoscopy (17). Our findings demonstrated that by

    employing conventional endoscopy, esophageal

    erosive lesions were encountered in 33% of the

    patients with GERD. Application of NBI into the

    assessment of the squamo-columnar junction

    increased the ERD prevalence to 53% in the same

    study population. The ability to detect esophagitis

  • is therefore improved through the use of NBI

    compared to standard white-light endoscopy

    (p=0.004). A recent study showed that intra-

    observer and inter-observer reproducibility in

    determining the esophageal lesions in patients

    with GERD can be improved by utilizing NBI

    endoscopy compared with conventional

    endoscopy (20). Sharma et al assessed the utility of

    NBI in patients with GERD symptoms and found

    that a significantly higher proportion of patients

    with GERD had an increased number of dilatation

    and tortuosity of intra-papillary capillary loops

    (IPCLs), micro-erosions, and increased

    vascularity at the squamo-columnar junction

    compared with the control subjects (15). In another

    study which included a group of 230 patients with

    GERD symptoms, 65.6% of patients were graded

    as normal following conventional endoscopy,

    whereas 59.1% of patients were graded as normal

    following NBI (20). Up to 6% of patients were

    reclassified from NERD to grade A esophagitis by

    the utilization of NBI. In our work, we observed a

    greater shift; 20% of patients diagnosed by

    conventional endoscopy as NERD were

    reclassified as having ERD after NBI evaluation.

    On the other hand, 67% of patients were graded as

    normal with standard endoscopy, while only 47%

    of patients proved to be normal with NBI.

    Histological changes, such as basal cell

    hyperplasia and location of the papillae close to

    the epithelial surface have been well-documented

    in esophageal specimens of GERD patients (23).

    Therefore, histological examination of the

    esophageal mucosa may provide greater

    sensitivity when detecting subtle changes of

    mucosa (23). In a previous study, histology was

    abnormal in 96% of patients with erosive

    esophagitis and in 76% of patients with NERD (24). In our study, 20 patients with standard white-

    light endoscopy and 32 patients with NBI showed

    reflux esophagitis. The histology was abnormal in

    all patients with erosive esophagitis that were

    diagnosed with standard white-light endoscopy

    and NBI. Zuberi et al showed that in 196 GERD

    patients, histological examination revealed

    presence of inflammation in 140 patients (71.4%)

    patients, while the remaining had normal

    histology. In this study, over 50% of patients had

    NERD. The severity of clinical symptoms

    correlated with the endoscopic findings but not

    with histological findings (25). In our study, in 60

    symptomatic GERD patients, 40 cases with

    standard white light endoscopy and 28 cases with

    NBI were diagnosed as NERD. The pathological

    examination of esophageal specimens revealed

    normal findings in 17 patients. Most patients

    involved in our study showed histological changes

    in esophageal mucosa, which is concordant with

    the results of Zuberi et al. We concluded that,

    narrow band imaging upper gastrointestinal

    endoscopy is more sensitive than the standard

    white-light endoscopy in the detection of

    esophageal lesions in GERD patients. However,

    histopathological evaluation may provide better

    sensitivity for evaluating esophageal mucosa in

    non-erosive reflux disease.

    References

    1. Azumi T, Adachi K, Furuta K. Esophageal epithelial surface in patients with

    gastroesophageal reflux disease: An electron

    microscopic study. World J Gastroenterol 2008;

    14: 5712-5716.

    2. Richter JE, Friedenberg FK. Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. In: Feldman M,

    Friedman LS, Brandt LJ (eds). Sleisenger and

    Fordtran’s Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease. 9th

    ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier, 2010:705-727.

    3. Dent J, EI-Serag HB, Wallander MA, Johansson S. Epidemiology of gastro-esophageal

    reflux disease: a systematic review. Gut 2005; 54:

    710-717.

    4. Ponce J, Vegazo O, Beltran B. Prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease in Spain and

    associated factors. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2006;

    23: 175-184.

    5. Fujiwara Y, Higuchi K, Watanabe Y. Prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease and

    gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms in

    Japan. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005; 20: 26-29.

    6. Chen M, Xiong L, Chen H, Xu A, He L, Hu P. Prevalence, risk factors and impact of

    gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms: a

    population based study in South China. Scand J

    Gastroenterol 2005; 40: 759-767.

    7. Nandurkar S, Talley NJ, Martin CJ, Ng T, Adams S. Esophageal histology does not provide

    additional useful information over clinical

    assessment in identifying reflux patients

    presenting for esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Dig

    Dis Sci 2000; 45: 217-224.

  • 8. Richter JE. Severe reflux esophagitis. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 1994; 4: 677-698.

    9. Vakil N, Van Zanten SV, Kahrilas P, Dent J, Jones R; Global Consensus Group. The Montreal

    definition and classification of gastroesophageal

    reflux disease: a global evidence-based consensus.

    Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 1900–1920.

    10. Armstrong D, Bennett JR, Blum AL. The endoscopic assessment of esophagitis: a progress

    report on observer agreement. Gastroenterology

    1996; 111: 85–92.

    11. Falk GW. Is conventional endoscopic identification of non-erosive reflux disease

    adequate? Digestion 2008; 78 Suppl 1: 17–23.

    12. Jones RH, Hungin AP, Phillips J, Mills JG. Gastroesophageal reflux disease in primary

    care in Europe: Clinical presentation and

    endoscopic findings. Eur J Gen Pract 1995; 1:

    149-154.

    13. Lundell LR, Dent J, Bennett JR. Endoscopic assessment of oesophagitis: Clinical and

    functional correlation and further validation of the

    Los Angeles classification. Gut 1999; 45: 172-

    180.

    14. Nasseri-Moghaddam S, Razjouyan H, Nouraei M. Inter- and intra-observer variability of

    the Los Angeles classification: a reassessment.

    Arch Iranian Med 2007; 10: 48 – 53.

    15. Sharma P, Wani S, Bansal A. A feasibility trial of narrow band imaging endoscopy in

    patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.

    Gastroenterology 2007; 133: 454–464.

    16. Gono K, Obi T, Yamaguchi M. Appearance of enhanced tissue features in narrow-band

    endoscopic imaging. J Biomed Opt 2004; 9: 568–

    577.

    17. Fock KM, Teo EK, Ang TL, Tan JY, Law NM. The utility of narrow band imaging in

    improving the endoscopic diagnosis of

    gastroesophageal reflux disease. Clin

    Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009; 7: 54–59.

    18. Frierson HF Jr. Histology in the diagnosis of reflux esophagitis. Gastroenterol Clin North Am

    1990; 19: 631-644.

    19. Schindlbeck NE, Wiebecke B, Klauser AG, Voderholzer WA, Muller Lissner SA. Diagnostic

    value of histology in non-erosive gastro-

    oesophageal reflux disease. Gut 1996; 39:151-

    154.

    20. Lee YC, Lin JT, Chiu HM. Intraobserver and interobserver consistency for grading esophagitis

    with narrow-band imaging. Gastrointest Endosc

    2007; 66: 230-236.

    21. Gatopoulou A, Mimidis K, Giatromanolaki A. Impact of hiatal hernia on histological pattern

    of non-erosive reflux disease. BMC Gastroenterol

    2005; 5;2.

    22. Armstrong D. Endoscopic evaluation of gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Yale J Biol Med

    1999; 72: 93–100.

    23. Allende DS, Yerian LM. Diagnosing gastroesophageal reflux disease the pathologist’s

    perspective. Adv Anat Pathol 2009; 16: 161-165.

    24. Zentillin P, Savarino V, Mastracci L. Reassessment of the diagnostic value of histology

    in patients with GERD, using multiple biopsy

    sites and an appropriate control group. Am J

    Gastroenterol 2005; 100: 2299-2306.

    25. Zuberi BF, Faisal N, Quraishy MS, Afsar S, Kazi LA, Kazim E. Correlation between clinical

    endoscopic and histological findings at esophago-

    gastric junction in patients of gastroesophageal

    reflux disease. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2005;

    15: 774-777.

  • Original Article

    Study of The Efficacy of Flumazenil Therapy in Different Clinical Stages of

    Hepatic Encephalopathy

    El Hasafy Youssef Ma*, Hassouna Moustafa Ea, Rady Refaat Ab* a* Internal Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt. b* Neuropsychiatry Department, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.

    ABSTRACT

    Background: hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a syndrome characterized by depressed level of consciousness, cognitive

    impairment, and personality changes induced by circulating neurotoxic substances that have bypassed normal hepatic

    detoxification because of diversion of portal blood flow into the systemic circulation. Hepatic encephalopathy most

    commonly occurs in the setting of hepatic cirrhosis or in those who have undergone portocaval shunt surgery. Up to two

    thirds of patients with cirrhosis may have subclinical hepatic encephalopathy. About 30% of patients with end-stage

    liver disease develop clinically significant hepatic encephalopathy. Treatment of hepatic encephalopathy with

    flumazenil, a benzodiazepine receptor antagonist, has been described in the literature but has not yet made its way into

    routine clinical practice in the Emergency department (ED). Aim of the work: The aim of this study is to evaluate the

    efficacy of flumazenil therapy in different clinical stages of hepatic encephalopathy. Patients and Methods: This study

    was conducted on sixty patients with clinical HE due to acute liver failure or decompersated liver cirrhosis attending to

    the department of emergency medicine, 20 patients were randomized as group not received flumazenil. 40 patients were

    randomized as group received flumazenil by direct intravenous route in which 20 patients with grade 1 and 2 HE and 20

    patients with grade 3 and 4. Also, 20 age and sex matched healthy subjects with no evidence of live disease were

    included as control group. Serum benzodiazepine level, Glasgow come scale (GCS) with grading of HE and arterial

    blood ammonia were assessed before and after receiving intravenous flumazeni 0.5 mg. within 6 hours. Results:

    clinical improvement was obtained regarding GCS in grade 1.2 HE pre 10.0-15.0 with the mean 12.95 ± 1.47. post: 10.0

    – 15.0 with the mean 14.05 ± 10.64. Then control treatment. for grading of HE the best improvement accrued in control

    treatment. pre: 1.0 – 3.0 with the mean 2.05 ± 0.76. post: 0.0-3.0 with the mean 1.25 ± 1.12. then HE grade 1.2.

    Conclusions: Flumazenil therapy had a beneficial effect on improvement of HE at the end of treatment in early stages

    with no effect on serum ammonia or serum benzodiazepine level.

    Introduction

    Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a syndrome

    observed in patients with cirrhosis, which is

    defined as a spectrum of neuropsychiatric

    abnormalities in patients with liver dysfunction,

    after exclusion of other known brain disease. It is

    characterized by personality changes, intellectual

    impairment, and a depressed level of

    consciousness. HE is also described in patients

    without cirrhosis with either spontaneous or

    surgically created protosystemic shunts.(1). Subtle

    signs of HE are observed in nearly 70% of

    patients with cirrhosis. Symptoms may be

    debilitating in a significant number of patients and

    are observed in 24-53% of patients who undergo

    portosystemic shunt surgery. Approximately 30%

    of patients dying of end stage liver disease

    experience significant encephalopathy,

    approaching coma.(2). HE appears to be result of

    both vascular and parenchymal mechanism. The

    vascular causes include a serious of pathological

    conditions in which toxic metabolites accumulate

    in the systemic circulation due to vascular bypass

    of the liver. Congenital portocaval shunts are

    example of pure vascular diseases. The

    parenchymal causes of HE include the conditions

    in which the blood supply to the liver is normal

    but the population of active hepatocyts is

    decreased. An example of pure parenchymal HE

    is fulminant hepatic failure due to acetaminophen

  • overdose.(3). The neurotransmitter rather than

    deficit in the cerebral energy metabolism appears

    to be involved. The neuronal cell most vulnerable

    to liver failure is astrocyte.(4). Also, cerebral

    atrophy was reported in brain scans of cirrhotic

    patients with chronic recurrent HE. Other

    explaination for HE is accumulation of the toxic

    substances such as: ammonia, mercaptanes, short

    and medium chain fatty acids, manganese, phenol

    and dehydrocholate in cases of liver failure which

    may increase permeability of the blood brain

    barrier (BBB) through different mechanisms.(5,6).

    Arterial blood ammonia concentrations are

    frequently elevated in patients with all forms of

    HE, is provided the results of recent studies using

    positron Emission Tomography (PET) scan and

    such studies demonstrate an increase in the rate at

    which ammonia is taken up and metabolized by

    brain.(7-9) . Glutamate is a major CNS excitatory

    neurotransmitter in the mammalian brain.

    Released from the presynaptic nerve terminal is

    inactivated into glutamine via the action of

    Glutamine Synthetase (GS). Brain glutamine

    concentrations are invariably increased in human

    HE, Which is consistent with exposure of brain to

    increased concentrations of blood borne ammonia

    in liver failure.(13) Neuromuscular abnormalities

    including extrapyramidal symptoms such as

    tremor and rigidity form part of the clinical

    syndrome of HE.(10). The involvement of the

    gamma amino butyric acid (GABA) receptors in

    HE was first hypothesized by Schafer & Jones.

    This theory, as different groups found that GABA

    agonists such as barbiturates, benzodiazepines and

    muscimol potentiated HE symptoms, while the

    administration of the GABA antagonist was found

    to improve neurophysiologic changes and

    behavioral symptoms of HE.(11). Increase in the

    levels of endogenous ligands to the Penzodiazepine

    receptors (BZR) have been demonstrated in a wide

    range of experiments in animal models and

    humans. Benzodiazepine concentrations have been

    shown to be increased in the cerebrospinal fluid

    and in postmortem brain samples of patients with

    HE. BZR binding in the brain of patient with

    recurrent HE has also been shown to tbe increased

    in PET.(12). it was subsequently demonstrated that

    treatment of cultured astrocytes with millimolar

    concentrations of ammonia results in increased

    binding of BZR ligands. The role of nitric oxide

    (NO) which is a free radical that was implicated in

    the hyper dynamic circulation in liver cirrhosis

    has been emerged also in the pathogenesis of

    HE.(13). The possibility of having benzodiazepine

    – like substances circulating and producing some

    of the symptoms of the HE prompted a great deal

    of research. Upon these findings, treatment with

    the benzodiazepine antagonist flumazenil was

    attempted in HE patients and improvements were

    found in some cases. However, the implication of

    benzodiazepines in HE has also been criticized.

    The grounds for criticism stem from studies

    reporting that increased levels of benzodiazepine

    ligands seem to accumulate in severe liver disease

    independently of the presence of HE, and their

    levels are similar to those commonly found in

    exogenous benzodiazepine consumers.(14)

    Aim of The Work

    The aim of the work is to evaluate serum levels of

    benzodiazepines and the effect of administration

    of flumazenil drug in the different stages of

    hepatic encephalopathy.

    Subjects

    Sixty patients with clinical HE due to acute liver

    failure or decompensated liver cirrhosis attending

    to the Department of Emergency Medicine were

    included in the study. (1) Twenty patients were

    randomized as group not received flumazenil,

    forty patients were randomized as group receiving

    flumazenil by direct intravenous root in which,

    Twenty patients in HE grade 1 and 2, Twenty

    patients in HE grade 3 and 4. (2) Twenty age and

    sex matched healthy subjects with no evidence of

    liver disease were included as control group.

    Patient and Methods

    During period of stabilization all patients will

    receive standard treatment - Lactulose 30 ml

    orally every 6 hours and, diet of approximately

    2000 k. cal. per day. Containing 20 gm proteins.

  • All patients were subjected to the following:

    - Informed consent and complete history were

    taken. - Full thorough clinical examination of all

    patients and determining. - Glasgow coma scale.

    HE grading were done using West Haven

    classification.

    Laboratory investigations including:

    - Arterial blood ammonia level, liver test profile,

    arterial blood gases, Serum benzodiazepine

    level.(15.16). Forty patients were allocated to receive

    flumazenil 0.5 mg amp I.V. by direct intravenous

    root and serum Benzodiazepine level was

    measured again after giving fiumazenil. HE

    grading, arterial serum ammonia, and Glasgow

    coma scale were repeated after starting treatment

    by six hours.

    Results

    The main demographic, laboratory and clinical data

    (aetiology of liver cirrhosis, child-Pugh scores) of

    the studied groups in table I.

    Table (1): Demographic and clinical characteristics of the studied groups.

    Control

    (n = 20)

    HEG (1.2)

    (n = 20)

    HEG (3.4)

    (n = 20)

    NO % NO % NO %

    Age (Years) (Mean ± SD) 56.80 9.57 52.80 10.09 60.0 8.16

    Sex (M/F) 13/7 14/6 16/4

    Child A score 0 0.0 5 25.0 1 5.0

    Child B score 2 10.0 3 15.0 5 25.0

    Child C score 18 90.0 12 60.0 14 70.0

    Acute liver failure 2 10.0 3 15.0 3 15.0

    Liver cirrhosis 18 90.0 17 85.0 17 85.0

    Improvement of the neurological status was

    observed in patient with HEG 1,2 regarding GCS

    pretreatment 10.0-15.0 with the mean 12.95±1.47

    post treatment 10.0-15.0 with the mean

    14.05±1.64. For serum ammonia level,

    improvement in HEG 1,2 was more than in HEG

    3,4 patients after treatment 132.0±35.79 than

    103.20±38.93. Comparison between pre and post

    treatment results in each group according to serum

    BZD level the results showed that: No significant

    changes occurred in any group.

    Figure (1): Relation between benzodiazepine level and Child Pugh classification in each group.

    Benzodiazepine level appears to be related to the degree of the severity of liver disease and child Pugh classification the level

    increased with increased severity of liver disease and child Pugh classification.

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    700

    800

    Control treatment HEG (1.2) HEG (3.4)

    Mea

    n o

    f b

    enzo

    dia

    zeb

    ine

    Child A

    Child B

    Child C

  • Table (2): Comparison between pre and post treatment results in each group according to different Parameter

    Control treatment HEG (1.2) HEG (3.4)

    Pre Post Pre Post Pre Post

    GCS

    Range 11.0-15.0 9.0-15.0 10.0-15.0 10.0-15.0 3.0-15.0 3.0-15.0

    Mean ± SD 12.35 ± 1.14 13.15 ± 1.87 12.95 ± 1.47 14.05 ± 1.64 8.75 ±0.44 5.40 ±4.16

    Median 12.0 13.50 13.0 15.0 12.0 12.0

    % of change 6.95 9.11 11.23

    p 0.103 0.007* 0.050

    HEG

    Range 1.0 - 3.0 0.0 - 3.0 1.0 – 2.0 0.0 – 3.0 3.0 – 4.0 2.0 – 4.0

    Mean ± SD 2.05 ± 0.76 1.25 ± 1.12 1.55 ± 0.51 0.80 ± 0.83 3.40 ± 0.50 3.35 ± 0.75

    Median 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 3.0 3.50

    % of change 35.83 52.50 1.25

    P 0.007*

  • correlated with the severity of hepatic

    encephalopathy.(28) Several other hypotheses have

    been proposed: deposition of manganese in the

    basal ganglia,(18) deficiency of zinc (responsive to

    a decrease in urea cycle enzymes) and

    hyperactivity of the GABA-ergic system.

    However, as stated by Basile and Jones, 3 the two

    main theories for hepatic encephalopathy in

    cirrhotic patients, i.e. the ammonia theory and the

    GABA-ergic theory, are not mutually exclusive.

    The rationale for the latter hypothesis is that

    benzodiazepines have a depressant effect on the

    central nervous system with a high affinity for

    GABA receptors. Endogenous benzodiazepine

    agonists, called benzodiazepine-like substances,

    have been found in experimental studies,(19,20) and

    have been detected in the cerebral tissue,

    cerebrospinal fluid and serum of cirrhotic patients

    with hepatic encephalopathy. Flumazenil is

    usually used for the diagnosis of suspected

    poisoning in emergency situations and for the

    treatment of benzodiazepine intoxication.(21) This

    antagonist property has been proposed in the

    treatment of hepatic encephalopathy. Open studies

    with flumazenil in humans have shown an

    improvement of hepatic encephalopathy.(5-9).

    Flumazenil had a significant beneficial effect on

    improvement of hepatic encephalopathy at the end

    of treatment in early stages only. This may be due

    to the presence of many other factors with

    advancing HE stage. Flumazenil had no

    significant effect on recovery or mortality.

    Although we failed to find significant differences

    in plasma Benzodiazepine Receptor Ligands

    (BZRL) levels between the patients with HE and

    those liver cirrhosis, we observed that a

    significantly larger proportion of patients in the

    HE group than in the liver cirrhosis group had

    pharmacologically meaningful levels of

    Benzodiazepine in their plasma. This finding

    suggests that plasma Receptor Ligands BZRL

    begin to accumulate in patients with

    decoompensated liver cirrhosis without causing

    clinical cognitive impairment. The (BZRL) may

    then continue to accumulate reaching their highest

    concentrations during HE stages 3 and 4.(22)

    Further support for this notion is provided by the

    observation that plasma BZRL levels correlate

    moderately with the 4 HE stages of severity. The

    fact that some patients in the cirrhotic patients

    group (20%) had pharmacologically meaningful

    plasma levels of BZRL without clinical signs of

    encephalopathy and that no BZRL were detected

    in approximately one-third of patients with HE

    suggests that neuropsychiatric symptoms in HE

    cannot be explained by the presence of these

    compounds alone. Olasma et al and Basile et al

    have reported that significant plasma BZRL levels

    were present in approximately 60% of patients

    with HE. Additionally, results from a controlled

    clinical trial of the efficacy of the benzodiazepine-

    receptor antagonist flumazenil in the treatment of

    HE showed a significant improvement in only 40

    % of patients and symptom reduction of no more

    than 50%.(23) These findings suggest that factors

    other than the GABA-benzodiazepine complex

    receptor and endogenous benzodiazepine

    compounds may play a role in the pathogenesis of

    HE.(24)

    Conclusions

    • Benzodiazepine (BZD) level has no correlation

    with hepatic encephalopathy grade (HEG). It

    appears that the level is more related to the degree

    of liver impairment. • Flumazenil therapy had a

    significant beneficial effect on improvement

    of hepatic encephalopathy at the end of

    treatment in early stages only with no

    significant effect of adding flumazenil in

    treatment of hepatic encephalopathy (HE) in late

    stages. • Flumazenil therapy has no effect on

    serum ammonia or benzodiazepine level.

    References

    1. Ference P, Lockwood A, Mullen K, et al

    Hepatic encephalopathy definition, nomenclature,

    diagnosis, and qualification: final report of the

    working party at the lit World Congress of

    Gastroenterology, Vienna 2002;35:716-21 .

  • 2. Poordad FF. Review article: the burden of

    hepatic encephalopathy Aliment Pharmaco Ther

    2006;25(l):3-9.

    3. Kundra A, Jain A, Banga A, etal. Evaluation

    of plasma ammonia levels in Patients with acute

    liver failure and chronic liver disease and its

    correlation with the severity of hepatic

    encephalopathy and clinical features of raised

    intracranial tension. Clin Biochem 2005;38:696-9.

    4. Shawcross DL, Davies NA, Williams R, et

    al. Systemic inflammatory Response exacerbates

    the neuropsychological effects of induced

    hyperammonemia in cirrhosis. J Hepatol

    2004;40:247-54.

    5. Weissenborn K, Giewekemeyer K,

    Heidenreich S , et al. Attention, memory, and

    cognitive function in hepatic encephalopathy.

    Metabolic Brain Dis 2005;20:359-67.

    6. Prasad S, Dhiman RK, Duseja A, et al.

    Lactulose improve cognitive Functions and

    health-related quality of life in patients with

    cirrhosis who have minimal hepatic

    encephalopathy. Hepatology 2007;45:549- 59.

    7. Mullen KD. Pathogenesis, clinical

    manifestation, and diagnosis of hepatic

    encephalopathy. Semin Liver Dis 2007;27 (Suppl

    2):3-9.

    8. Ferenci P. Treatment options for hepatic

    encephalopathy: a review. Semin Liver Dis

    2007;27(Suppl 2): 10-7.

    9. Gabouza N , Nicolao F, Efrati C, Masini A,

    et al. Role of determination of partial pressure of

    ammonia in cirrhotic patients with and without

    hepatic encephalopathy. Flepatol :Neurology

    2002.03;38:441-6.

    10. Conn HO, Leevy,CM, Vlahcevic ZR, et al.

    Comparison of lactulose and neomycin In the

    treatment of chronic portal-systemic ence-

    phalopathy gastero entrology 2006; 72:573-83.

    11. Lizardi-Cervera J, Almeda P, Guevara L, et

    al. Hepatic encephalopathy: a review .Ann

    Hepatol 2003;2(3): 122-30.

    12. Als-Nielsen B, Gluud LL, Gluud C. Non-

    absorbable disaccharides for Hepatic

    encephalopathy: systematic review of randomised

    trials. BMJ 2004;328:1046.

    13. Huang E, Esrailian E, Spiegel BMR. The

    cost effectiveness and budget impact of

    competing therapies hepatic encephalopathy

    adecision analysis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther

    2007;26:1147-61.

    14. Ross BD, Danielsen ER, Bluml S. Proton

    magnetic resonance spectroscopy : the new gold

    standard for diagnosis of clinical and subclinical

    hepatic encephalopathy. Dig Dis 1999;14:30-9.

    15. Wright G, Jalan R. Management of hepatic

    encephalopathy in patients with cirrhosis. best

    Pract res clin gastroenterology 2007; 21: 95-10.

    16. Amodio P, montagnese S, Gatta A, et al. the

    characteristics of minimal hepatic ence-

    phalopathy. Metab Brain Dis 2004; 19: 253-67.

    17. McGorum BC, Murphy D, LoveS , et al:

    Clinicopathological features of equineprimary

    hepatic disease: A review of 50 cases. Vet Rec

    2006; 145: 134-9.

    18. Pidoux B, Zylberberg P, Valla D, Opolon P.

    Electroencephalographic study of the Effect of a

    benzodiazepine antagonist in hepatic

    encephalopathy. Neurophysiol Clin 1995;19:469-

    76.

    19. Pidoux et al. electroencephalographic study

    of the effect of a benzodiazepine antagonist in

    hepatic encephalopathy, neurophysiol Clin Fr

    1989.; 19: 469-76.

  • 20. Van der Rijt CC, Schalm SW, Meulstee J,

    Stijnen T. Flumazenil therapy for hepatic

    encephalopathy. A double- blind cross over study.

    Gastroenterol Clin Biol 1995;19:572-80.

    21. C. Goulenok , B. Bernard, J. F. Cadranel, D.

    Thabut, V. Di martino,P. Opolon , T. Poynard.

    Flumazenil vs. placebo in hepatic encephalopathy

    in patients with cirrhosis: a meta-analysis.

    Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2002; 16: 361-72.

    22. R Avallone, M L Zeneroli, I Venturini, L

    Corsi, P Schreier ,M Kleinschnitz, C Ferrarese ,F

    Farina, C Baraldi, N Pecora, M Frigo, M Baraldi.

    Endogenous benzodiazepine-like compounds and

    diazepam binding inhibitor in serum of patients

    with liver cirrhosis with and without

    overtencephalopathy. Gut 1998;42:861-7.

    23. Mehmet Dursun, Mustafa Caliskan, Fikri

    Canoruc, Ufuk Aluclu, Naime Canoruc, Alpaslan

    Tuzcu, Serif Yilmaz,Abdurrahman Isikdogan,

    Meliksah ErtemThe efficacy of flumazenil in

    subclinical to mild hepatic encephalopathic

    ambulatory patients a prospective, randomised,

    double-blind, placebo-controlled study swiss med

    wkly 2003;133:118-23.

    24. Barbara G. Lock, MD Kiran Pandit, MD,

    MPH Is Flumazenil an EffectiveTreatment for

    Hepatic Encephalopathy? Ann Emerg Med.

    2006;47:286-8.

  • Suppression of The Inflammatory Cascade and Oxidative Stress in

    Hepatocellular Carcinoma Tumor Bearing Mice: Effect of Combination of

    Curcumin, Leflunomide and Perindopril

    Magda Nasr a, Eman Selima a, Omar Hamed b, Amany Kazem c a Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Medical Research Institute, Alexandria University, 165

    Horreya Avenue, Alexandria, Egypt b Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Pharos University, Alexandria, Egypt c Department of Pathology, Medical Research Institute, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt

    ABSTRACT

    Chemoprevention has been considered the best strategy in lowering the current mortality associated with

    hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Our previous study showed that combination treatment with leflunomide,

    perindopril and curcumin resulted in synergistic inhibition of angiogenesis and consequently more effective

    chemoprevention of HCC. Aim of the work: In the present study, we examined other underlying

    mechanisms of HCC chemoprevention by investigating the effects of curcumin, leflunomide or perindopril

    and their combination on oxidative damage and inflammatory markers during diethylnitrosamine (DEN)-

    induced hepatocarcinogenesis in mice. Patients and Methods: Six mice groups were used: control, positive

    control (DEN-induced HCC), DEN+leflunomide, DEN+perindopril, DEN+curcumin, DEN+combination.

    Liver tissues were used for assessment of reduced glutathione (GSH), superoxide dismutase enzyme (SOD),

    malondialdehyde, protein carbonyl , tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α) and inducible nitric oxide synthase

    (iNOS) expression. Results: There was a significant increase in hepatic lipid peroxidation and protein

    carbonyl, a significant decrease in SOD activity and GSH level in DEN-treated animals compared to normal

    controls. Elevated expressions of iNOS and increased levels of TNF-α were observed in livers of the same

    animals. Curcumin , leflunomide or perindopril and their combination reversed all the aforementioned

    markers with more pronounced effects obtained with the combination regimen. Conclusion: The present

    study provides evidence that suppression of oxidative stress and inflammatory response could play an

    important role in chemoprevention and that the combination has more potent antioxidant and anti-

    inflammatory properties than each of the probed agents. The outcome of this study may highlight the use of

    this combination in prevention and intervention of human HCC.

    Introduction

    Considering the limited treatment and grave

    prognosis of hepatocelllar carcinoma (HCC),

    chemoprevention has been considered the best

    strategy in lowering the current morbidity and

    mortality associated with this disease (1). Although

    the cellular mechanisms contributing to

    hepatocarcinogenesis are relatively unknown, a

    connection between inflammation and liver cancer

    is beginning to be unraveled. The role of

    inflammation in the promotion of carcinogenesis

    was originally proposed by Virchow in 1863.

    Along this line, compelling evidence has

    accumulated which provides an insight into the

    role of inflammation in initiation, promotion and

    progression of HCC (2). Hepatic inflammation, due

    to exposure to infectious agents (hepatotropic

    viruses) as well as toxic compounds, may

    represent an early step in the development of

    malignancy with genetic and epigenetic events

    occurring as a later manifestation of a prolonged

    inflammatory process (3-4). It has been shown that

    HCC almost always develops on a background of

    chronic liver injury including chronic hepatitis

    and cirrhosis, both considered to be preneoplastic

  • stages of hepatocellular tumor development(5). An

    expanding body of evidence suggests that

    inflammation-mediated processes, including the

    production of cytokines, chemokines, reactive

    oxygen and nitrogen species, and mediators of

    inflammatory pathways may contribute to hepatic

    neoplasia(6-8). Oxidative stress, through generation

    of reactive oxygen species (ROS) acts as a

    predisposing factor to hepatocarcinogenesis and is

    the common driving force of HCC in chronic liver

    diseases (6,9). This stressful condition is known to

    play a major role in cancer development, mainly

    by enhancing DNA damage and modifying some

    key cellular processes, such as cell proliferation,

    apoptosis, and cell motility cascades by

    superoxide radicals and hydrogen peroxides (10). It

    is well known that inflammation is one of the

    biological responses driven by oxidative stress.

    Thus, attenuation of oxidative damage as well as

    inflammation may have an important role in

    chemoprevention against hepatocarcinogenesis.

    We have previously reported, for the first time,

    that combination treatment with curcumin,

    leflunomide and perindopril affords

    chemoprevention against diethylnitrosamine

    (DEN)-induced hepatocarcinogenesis in a mouse

    model (11). Although the molecular mechanisms of

    liver tumor inhibitory effects of such combination

    have not been completely elucidated, we have

    found that synergistic angiopreventive effect is

    implicated in their prevention of DEN-induced

    HCC (12-14). In fact, ample studies have shown that

    curcumin exhibits a potent anti-inflammatory and

    antioxidant activities in vivo in chemically-

    induced hepatocarcinogenesis (15-19). In addition,

    leflunomide and perindopril have been reported to

    exert different inhibitory effects on inflammation (20-23). In view of these studies and as abnormal

    cell proliferation, inflammation and reactive

    oxygen species play crucial roles in angiogenesis [20-23], we hypothesized that combination of these

    drugs might have a potent anti-inflammatory and

    antioxidant effect, which may be linked to its

    previously observed antiangiogenic and

    antihepatocarcinogenic effect. Thus, the objective

    of the present study was to investigate the

    combined effect of curcumin, leflunomide and

    perindopril on inflammation and oxidative stress

    during DEN-induced hepatocarcinogenesis in

    mice.

    Material and methods

    Chemicals

    DEN and Curcumin powder (95% pure) were

    purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO,

    USA). Leflunomide and perindopril were

    generously supplied by EVA Pharm Co. (Cairo,

    Egypt) and Servier Co. (France), respectively. All

    other chemicals and reagents used were purchased

    from Chematech Co (Alexandria, Egypt).

    Animals

    Male Albino mice, 6-8 weeks old were purchased

    from the Animal House of the Medical Research

    Institute, Alexandria University. They were

    housed in stainless-steel mesh cages in groups of

    eight, under controlled conditions of light

    illumination, relative humidity and temperature.

    Animals were allowed access to food and tap

    water ad libitum throughout the acclimatization

    and experimental periods. All animal procedures

    were performed according to approved protocols

    and in accordance with the standard

    recommendations for the proper care and use of

    laboratory animals.

    Experimental design

    Liver samples utilized in the present study were

    harvested from our previously reported

    chemopreventive study following established

    DEN-induced hepatocarcinogenesis protocol (11).

    Mice were randomly divided into six groups (n=8

    in each group) except the DEN group which was

    comprised of 12 animals. While the negative

    control group served as the vehicle control, mice

    in the other groups received an intraperitoneal

    (i.p) injection of 75 mg/kg of DEN weekly for 3

    weeks, then 100 mg/kg weekly for another 3

    weeks. Mice in DEN group did not receive any

    additional treatment and served as positive

    controls. Four mice from the DEN group were

  • sacrificed starting from the 6th week following

    administration of the hepatocarcinogen DEN, at

    weekly intervals till the end of the 8th week, to

    monitor the appearance of HCC by

    histopathological examination of livers. Animals

    in leflunomide and perindopril groups were

    treated with 10 mg/kg/day of leflunomide and 2

    mg/kg/day of perindopril by oral gavage,

    respectively. Mice in curcumin group were treated

    with 100 mg/kg of curcumin three days a week

    intraperitoneally. The combination treatment of

    leflunomide, perindopril and curcumin group was

    designated as combination group. All drug

    treatments were given two weeks prior to DEN

    administration and for eight consecutive weeks.

    After 10 weeks, animals of all groups were

    sacrificed by cervical dislocation. Livers were

    excised and cut into small sections.The results on

    HCC incidence have already been reported (11). In

    the current study, liver sections were used for the

    preparation of liver homogenate to be used for

    tissue biochemical analysis and enzyme linked

    immunosorbent assay (ELISA) analysis.

    Lipid peroxidation

    The Thiobarbituric acid (TBA) test procedure

    described by Uchiyama and Mihara (1978) (24) is

    the most frequently used index of lipid

    peroxidation in various animal tissue

    homogenates. The TBARs is frequently referred

    to as malondialdehyde (MDA), which is generated

    by autoxidation of the polyunsaturated fatty acids

    PUFAs or esters containing three or more double

    bonds.

    Reduced glutathione (GSH):

    The GSH was measured according to Murphy’s

    method. (25) This method is based on the reductive

    cleavage of Ellman’s reagent (5,5’-dithiobis-2-

    nitrobenzoic acid) (DTNB), by SH group of

    glutathione to yield a yellow color with a

    maximum absorbance at 412 nm.

    Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity:

    The activity of SOD was determined by

    pyrogallol method of Marklund and Marklund.(26)

    This method depends on the spontaneous

    autoxidation of pyrogallol in alkaline pH,

    resulting in the production of superoxide anion

    radicals (O·2¯), which in turn enhance

    autoxidation of pyrogallol. Autoxidation is

    manifested as an increase in absorbance at 420

    nm.

    Protein carbonyl contents PCC):

    Protein carbonyl content (PCC) was determined

    spectrophotometrically by a method based on the

    reaction of the carbonyl group with 2,4-

    dinitrophenylhydrazine to form 2,4-

    dinitrophenylhydrazone (27) (values are expressed

    as nanomoles carbonyl/mg protein). Protein

    concentration was estimated using the Bio-Rad

    bovine serum albumin assay kit, following the

    manufacturer’s protocol.

    Tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α):

    Tumor necrosis factor- α (TNF- α) was assayed in

    crude liver tissue. This was done by ELISA(28)

    using kits commercially available from

    eBioscience® Inc., San Diego, USA and according

    to the manufacturer’s instructions.

    Immunohistochemical examination

    Immunohistochemical detection of iNOS in ∼10-

    μm-thick liver sections was done by standard

    immunohistochemical techniques(29). Briefly, the

    sections were incubated for 10 minutes at 80°C in

    10 mmol/L sodium citrate buffer (pH 6.0) for

    antigen retrieval. Following a 5-minute wash with

    PBS, the endogenous peroxidases were blocked

    by 1% H2O2 in PBS for 5 minutes. The sections

    were washed as before and blocked for 1 hour in

    PBS containing 5% normal goat serum. The slides

    were washed and then incubated overnight with

    primary antibodies (1:100) at 4°C in a humidified

    chamber. After washing with PBS, the sections

    were incubated with HRP-conjugated secondary

    antibody (goat anti-rabbit, 1:200 dilution) for 30

    minutes at 37°C. The chromogenic reaction was

    developed with 3,3′-diaminobenzidine

    tetrahydrochloride solution. Negative control

    sections were processed similarly with the

  • omission of the primary antibodies. All sections

    were viewed under a light microscope; 1,000

    hepatocytes were analyzed per animal; and results

    were expressed as percentage of positive cells.

    Statistical Analysis

    Quantitative data were described using median as

    well as mean ± SD. Comparisons between groups

    were performed with the nonparametric Mann–

    Whitney test in the case of abnormally distributed

    continuous variables, while with Fisher's exact

    test for categorical variables. Significance of the

    obtained results was judged at the 5% level.

    Results

    Antioxidant effects during

    hepatocarcinogenesis:

    Lipid peroxidation in mouse liver

    The extent of lipid peroxidation in hepatic tissue

    was determined by measuring MDA.

    Diethylnitrosamine treatment exhibited a

    significant increase (P < 0.05) in the generation of

    MDA in mice liver when compared to the control

    group. Curcumin (100 mg/kg, i.p), leflunomide

    (10 mg/kg, orally) or perindopril (2 mg/kg, orally)

    alone and their combination inhibited oxidative

    damage during DEN hepatocarcinogenesis as

    evidenced from their abilities to prevent DEN-

    induced hepatic lipid peroxidation in mice.

    Curcumin not only suppressed DEN-induced lipid

    peroxidation but also brought the levels more than

    normal control group. (Fig. 1-A)

    Protein carbonyls in mouse liver

    To explore the effects of the different regimens on

    the oxidative modifications of hepatic proteins

    during DEN hepatocarcinogenesis, we measured

    the carbonyl contents of proteins in several

    experimental groups. DEN administration

    produced a significant (P < 0.01) increase in

    protein carbonyls compared with normal animals

    (Fig.1-B). Treatment with curcumin (100 mg/kg,

    i.p), leflunomide (10 mg/kg, orally) or perindopril

    (2 mg/kg, orally) alone and their combination

    caused a reduction in DEN-induced increment in

    protein carbonyl. Remarkably, the level of protein

    carbonyl in the combination group was found to

    be slightly less than that of the normal group.

    Reduced glutathione (GSH) level in mouse

    liver

    Reduced GSH level (μ.mole/ g tissue) estimated

    in the liver of the different treated groups is

    illustrated in (Fig.1-C). A significant decrease in

    GSH level was observed in mice treated with

    DEN only compared to normal controls. All tested

    regimens including leflunomide (10 mg/kg - oral),

    curcumin (100 mg/kg - i.p) and perindopril (2

    mg/kg - oral) alone and their combination showed

    a significant increase in hepatic GSH level

    compared to the DEN- treated group. Noticeably,

    the combination treated group showed a marked

    increase in hepatic GSH that was significantly

    different from that of leflunomide, perindopril or

    even curcumin which induced the highest

    elevation in GSH level among other

    monotherapies.

    Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity in mouse

    liver

    Results concerned with the effect of DEN

    administration alone or with the different

    preventive regimens on SOD activity in mice

    livers, estimated as U/ml, are presented in (Fig.1-

    D). The DEN- treated group showed a significant

    decrease in SOD activity compared to the control

    group. A significant increase in the activity of

    hepatic SOD was detected with administration of

    curcumin (100 mg/kg, i.p), leflunomide (10

    mg/kg, orally) or perindopril (2 mg/kg, orally)

    alone as compared to the DEN group. Combined

    leflunomide, curcumin and perindopril treatment,

    two weeks prior to DEN administration and for 8

    consecutive weeks, caused a significant rise in

    hepatic SOD activity compared to the DEN group.

    The degree of elevation in hepatic SOD activity

    caused by the combination treatment was

    significantly more than that of perindopril,

    leflunomide and even curcumin which showed the

    highest increase among other monotherapies.

    http://cancerpreventionresearch.aacrjournals.org/content/3/6/753.long#F1

  • Fig.(1) Effects of leflunomide(10 mg/kg/day, oral), perindopril(2 mg/kg/day, oral) , curcumin (100 mg/kg/every other day, i.p)

    and their combination on DEN-induced alterations in the liver of male Albino mice (A) lipid peroxidation (MDA) (B) hepatic

    protein carbonyl (C) reduced glutathione (GSH) (D) Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity. Mice were sacrificed 10 weeks

    following the commencement of the study. Each column represents mean ± SD (n = 8 livers). *P < 0.05 as compared to DEN

    group; # P < 0.05 as compared to combination group

    Anti-inflammatory effects during

    hepatocarcinogenesis:

    Level of TNF-α in mouse liver

    The levels (pg/ml) of TNF-α expressed in mice

    livers tissues in different experimental groups are

    illustrated in Fig.2. Administration of either

    leflunomide (10 mg/kg - oral) , curcumin (100

    mg/kg- i.p) or perindopril (2 mg/kg - oral)

    resulted in a significant decrease in the level of

    hepatic TNF-α in mice compared to the DEN-

    treated group. A significant reduction in the level

    of hepatic TNF-α expression was noticed in mice

    treated with combined curcumin, leflunomide and

    perindopril compared to the DEN group.

    Although leflunomide showed the marked

    decrease in TNF-α level compared to other

    monotherapies, its co-administration with

    curcumin and perindopril showed a characteristic

    significant reduction in hepatic TNF-α, as

    measured 8 weeks following DEN administration.

    Fig.(2) Effects of leflunomide (10 mg/kg/day, oral),

    perindopril(2 mg/kg/day, oral), curcumin (100

    mg/kg/every other day, i.p) and their combination on

    DEN-induced alterations in the level of tumor necrosis

    factor alpha (TNF-α) during hepatocarcinogenesis in

    mouse liver. Mice were sacrificed 10 weeks following the

    commencement of the study. Each column represents

    mean ± SD (n = 8 livers). *P < 0.05 as compared to DEN

    group; # P < 0.05 as compared to combination group

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    Control DEN LEF

    + DEN

    PE

    + DEN

    CUR

    + DEN

    Combination

    + DEN

    MD

    A (µ

    mol

    /mg

    pro

    tein

    )

    *

    *#

    *#

    *# *

    0

    0.05

    0.1

    0.15

    0.2

    0.25

    0.3

    0.35

    0.4

    0.45

    Control DEN LEF

    +DEN

    PE

    +DEN

    CUR

    +DEN

    Combination

    + DEN

    Pro

    tein

    ca

    rb

    on

    yls

    (n

    an

    om

    o/m

    g p

    ro

    tein

    )

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    Control DEN LEF

    + DEN

    PE

    + DEN

    CUR

    + DEN

    Combination

    + DEN

    Mea

    n G

    SH

    in li

    ver

    (μ.m

    ole/

    g ti

    ssu

    e)

    *

    *#*#

    *#

    *

    0.0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1.0

    1.2

    1.4

    1.6

    Control DEN LEF

    + DEN

    PE

    + DEN

    CUR

    + DEN

    Combination

    + DEN

    Mea

    n S

    OD

    in li

    ver(

    U/m

    l)

    *

    *#

    *#

    *#

    *

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    Control DEN LEF

    + DEN

    PE

    + DEN

    CUR

    + DEN

    Combination

    + DEN

    Mea

    n h

    epa

    tic

    TN

    F –

    α (

    Pg

    /ml)

    *

    *

    *#

    *#

    *#

    *

    *# *#

    *#

    *

    A

    A

    A B

    C D

  • iNOS induction during hepatocarcinogenesis

    Minimal hepatic iNOS expression was observed

    in normal animals (Fig. 3). Treatment with

    curcumin (100 mg/kg, i.p), leflunomide (10

    mg/kg, orally) or perindopril (2 mg/kg, orally)

    alone and their combination reduced the hepatic

    iNOS protein expression in DEN-treated group.

    The degree of supression of iNOS over expression

    caused by the combination treatment was

    significantly more than that of perindopril,

    curcumin and even leflunomide which showed the

    highest increase among other monotherapies.

    A

    Fig. (3A) Effects of of leflunomide(10 mg/kg/day, oral), perindopril(2 mg/kg/day, oral) , curcumin (100 mg/kg/every other

    day, i.p) and their combination on hepatic iNOS expression during DEN-induced hepatocarcinogenesis in male Albino mice.

    A, representative immunohistochemical localization of iNOS (magnification, 100×). Mice were sacrificed 10 weeks following

    the commencement of the study, and immunohistochemistry was done to detect iNOS. Arrows indicate immunohistochemical

    staining of iNOS. (a) Absence of immunostaining in normal liver, (b) intense immunoreactivity in DEN control liver, (c)

    marked decrease iNOS expression in the 100 mg/kg leflunomide group, (d) mild decrease iNOS expression in the 2 mg/kg

    perindopril group, (e) moderate decrease iNOS expression in the 2 mg/kg curcumin , and (f)almost normal–appearing liver of

    the combination group. Each column represents mean ± SD (n = 8 livers). *P < 0.05 as compared to DEN group; # P < 0.05 as

    compared to combination group

    a b

    c d

    e f

  • Fig. (3B) Effects of leflunomide(10 mg/kg/day, oral), perindopril(2 mg/kg/day, oral) , curcumin (100 mg/kg/every other day,

    i.p) and their combination on DEN-induced alterations in hepatic iNOS expression during heptaocarcinogenesis in mice. Mice

    were sacrificed 10 weeks following the commencement of the study. Each column represents mean ± SD (n = 8 livers). *P <

    0.05 as compared to DEN group; # P < 0.05 as compared to combination group

    Discussion

    Our previous study showed that combination

    treatment with leflunomide, perindopril and

    curcumin significantly inhibited DEN-induced

    hepatocarcinogenesis using a mouse model (11). It

    offered an advantage of more pronounced and

    effective chemoprevention, than single agent

    treatment, due to distinct complementary

    angiopreventive mechanisms. Nevertheless,

    additional studies were required to reveal other

    mechanisms implicated in the chemopreventive

    efficacy of such combination other than

    angioprevention. Two main findings are presented

    here. First, modulation of oxidative damage and

    suppression of inflammation are believed to be

    important means of protecting against

    hepatocarcinogenesis. Second, the data

    corroborate with our previous study suggesting

    that combination therapy is superior to single

    agent treatment, as it possesses additional

    antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties,

    which might play an essential role in protecting

    the liver against carcinogen-induced neoplasia.

    Data of the present study showed that DEN

    administration in mice increased biomarker of

    lipid peroxidation (MDA), protein carbonyls, and

    reduced antioxidant capacity (GSH content and

    SOD activity) in liver homogenates. These

    findings, which are consistent with previous

    reports(29-32) implicate oxidative stress in DEN-

    induced HCC deterioration during

    hepatocarcinogenesis in mouse liver. Reactive

    oxygen species (ROS) capable of producing lipid

    peroxidation and oxidation of DNA and other

    cellular macromolecules has a role in the

    initiation, promotion, and progression of

    hepatocarcinogenesis (33). DEN confers its

    hepatocarcinogenicity through metabolic

    activation in hepatic microsomes, resulting in the

    release of ethylcarbonium ions that bind to DNA,

    producing adducts and generating superoxide

    radicals through lipid peroxidation of

    phospholipid membrane fatty acids(34).

    Malondialdehyde (MDA), a product of lipid

    peroxidation of polyunsaturated fatty acid

    metabolism and degradation, has been established

    as a mutagenic and carcinogenic entity (31).

    Further,it has been established that ROS could

    modify the chemical structure of proteins with

    formation of protein carbonyls due to oxidative

    cleavage of the main peptide backbone or by

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    160

    180

    200

    Control DEN LEF

    + DEN

    PE

    + DEN

    CUR

    + DEN

    Combination

    + DEN

    iNO

    S p

    rote

    in e

    xp

    ress

    ion

    *

    *#

    *#

    *#

    *

  • oxidation of amino acids, including arginine,

    lysine, proline, and threonine (35). Protein carbonyl

    content has been the most commonly used marker

    of protein oxidation. It was reported that oxidative

    stress elevates the protein carbonyl content in

    plasma of HCC patients (36). Our results showed

    that pretreatment of DEN-induced HCC mice with

    curcumin, perindopril or leuflunomide reduced

    elevated levels of MDA and protein carbonyl and

    increased GSH content and SOD activity.

    Curcumin, a dietary polyphenol, has been

    reported to possess anti-inflammatory and

    antioxidant properties (37). Supporting our

    observations, Singh et al.(38) has shown that

    curcumin increases glutathione S-transferase

    activity which is involved in the synthesis of

    GSH; suggesting that curcumin increases de novo

    synthesis of glutathione. Similarly, curcumin has

    been reported (39, 40) to cause a beneficial increase

    in hepatic SOD activity. Accumulating evidence

    has shown that curcumin counteracted ROS by

    increasing ornithine decarboxylase, glutathione,

    antioxidant enzymes, and phase II metabolizing

    enzymes and thus protected the liver from

    oxidative damage induced by DEN

    administration(41). Curcumin inhibited superoxide

    anion generation in xanthine– xanthine oxidase

    system as well as hydroxyl ion generation (42). It

    has been reported that curcumin possesses both

    neuroprotective and anti-aging effects (43). One of

    the most important cellular defense mechanisms

    against oxidative stress or electrophiles is

    mediated by the transcription factor Nrf2 (43).

    Thus, curcumin can counteract the effect of

    oxidative stress through this pathway and help in

    avoiding an oxidative damage. Therefore, our data

    are in line with previous studies signifying that

    potent attenuation of oxidative stress could be

    involved in the observed chemopreventive action

    of curcumin in our previous study (11). As regards

    perindopril, our results provide an experimental

    evidence of the antioxidant potential of

    perindopril which could play an important role in

    the inhibition of HCC in mice. Published data

    with regards to the antioxidant properties of of

    angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors are

    controversial. Perindopril not only lowers blood

    pressure in elderly patients but also restores pro-

    and anti-oxidative homeostasis in order to

    increase anti-oxidative defenses (44). By contrast, it

    was found that only captopril, among ACEIs, that

    demonstrated antioxidant activity[23]. Published

    data highlight the antioxidative effect of

    leflunomide. Several studies demonstrated that

    leflunomide decreased the production of MDA

    and PC and increased antioxidant activity in liver

    injury induced by ischemia reperfusion or biliary

    obstruction (45, 46). Similarly, Manna et al. (47)

    showed that leflunomide suppressed TNF-induced

    reactive oxygen intermediate generation and lipid

    peroxidation. Yao et al. (48, 49) demonstrated that

    leflunomide significantly decreased

    proinflammatory cytokines and MDA and

    increased antioxidant activity in immunological-

    and CCl4- induced liver injury, respectively. The

    antioxidant activity of leflunomide could be

    attributed, at least in part, to its anti-inflammatory

    effect and its ability to inhibit dihydroorotate

    dehydrogenase enzyme. This explanation is

    supported by the ability of teriflunomide (non-

    enzymatic metabolite of leflunomide) to inhibit

    mitochondrial oxygen consumption and ROS

    production in premalignant and malignant prostate

    epithelial cells due to inhibition of dihydroorotate

    dehydrogenase enzyme (50). Further studies are

    needed to explain detailed mechanism of its

    antioxidant activity. Remarkably, pretreatment

    with the combination of leflunomide, perindopril

    and curcumin restored surrogate measures of the

    oxidative stress to near- control levels. Such

    potent antioxidant activity would presumably be

    related to the antioxidant effect of curcumin

    which had been the greatest among the probed

    drugs. Oxidative and inflammatory insults are

    intimately connected with each other in multistage

    carcinogenesis. During recent years, compelling

    evidence strongly implicates the role of

    inflammation in initiation, promotion, and

    progression of HCC (2). Inflammatory

    environment is one that would support tumor

    development and is consistent with that observed

    in tumor sites (52, 53). It is believed that

  • inflammation acts as a key regulator in the

    promotion of initiated hepatocytes during

    hepatocarcinogenesis, possibly by providing them

    with proliferating signals and/or preventing

    apoptosis (54, 55). Two major contributors of

    chronic inflammatory reactions are NO and TNF-

    α. Nitric oxide is produced by hepatic

    parenchymal as well as nonparenchymal cells

    from l-arginine by iNOS. Oxidative stress is

    known to increase iNOS gene transcription and

    promoter activity in hepatocytes (56). Mounting

    evidence underlines the important role that iNOS

    plays in the development and progression of HCC

    as this enzyme has been found to be

    overexpressed in rodents as well as human HCC (57, 58). Calvisi et al. (58) have shown that

    suppression of iNOS by aminoguanidine, a

    selective iNOS inhibitor, leads to suppression of

    HCC growth, suggesting that iNOS signaling

    could be an important target for prevention and

    treatment of human HCC. In the present study, we

    have observed an elevated level of hepatic iNOS

    expression in DEN-treated animals, confirming

    the results of prior studies (57, 59). Tumor necrosis

    factor-α acts as a master switch in establishing an

    intricate link between inflammation and cancer. It

    is also produced by tumors and can act as an

    endogenous tumor promoter(60). The hepatic level

    of TNF-α was significantly increased in mice

    receiving DEN only compared to normal controls.

    This result revealed the role of TNF-α as an

    inflammatory mediator in DEN-induced

    hepatocarcinogenesis, where DEN administration

    contributes to acute hepatitis, a pronounced

    Kupffer cell response, hepatocyte proliferation

    and DNA damage, ultimately leading to HCC

    (61.62). Data of the present study showed that

    pretreatment with leflunomide, perinopril or

    curcumin caused a significant reduction of TNF-α

    and iNOS expression in mice liver compared to

    the DEN animals. Remarkably, the decrease in

    TNF-α and iNOS expression as more pronounced

    in the leflunomide group. Similar effects have

    been previously reported, where leflunomide

    significantly suppressed hepatic TNF-α mRNA

    expression in vivo(63) and inhibited TNF-α

    released in Kupffer cells, following liver inj


Recommended