Page 1
MOODLE + WEB2.0 + SOFTCHALK =
ENGAGING ONLINE
COURSE DESIGN
Dr. Rhonda Ficek
Professor
Director of Instructional Technology Services
Minnesota State University Moorhead
Page 2
Online Course Design
Capture Attention
Design Objectives
Content
Interactions
Assessment
Page 3
Measurable Learning Objectives
RadioJames Objectives Builder
Page 4
Digital Bloom’s Taxonomy
Page 5
Creating Web-Based Instructional Units
with
Page 6
SoftChalk Interface
Page 7
Web 2.0 Applications
Addressing Different Learning Styles
Page 8
Student Introductions
Video Mail
WordleWord
Clouds
Glogster E-Posters
Page 9
Web 2.0 Applications:
Enhancing Collaboration with
Voice-Based Discussions
Page 10
Student Projects: Create a Digital Poster
Page 11
Student Projects: Concept Mapping
Page 12
Student Projects: Concept Mapping
Page 13
Why Moodle? ? Implicit Design:
Learning is a Social Activity
Content-Driven
Approach
Social Constructionist
Approach
Page 14
Open Source
Interoperability
Collaborative Tools
Personalized Learning Environments
Why Moodle ? ?
Opportunities for Innovation
Page 15
Discussions with Pictures
Page 16
Moodle’s Choice Tool (Polling)
Page 17
Database Activity
View
List
Page 18
Database Activity
View
Single
Page 19
Database Activity: Search
Searching:
Knowledge-Centered Wikis
Page 20
Database Activity: Search Results
Search
Results:
Knowledge-
Centered
Wikis
Page 21
Database Activity: Sharing
Export
all
Results
Page 22
Moodle: Display a Directory
Page 23
Display a Directory to Students
Page 24
Moodle – Open Source LMS
Moodle
Collaboration
Wiki DatabaseDisplay a
FolderBlog
Page 25
Questions?
Rhonda Ficek, Ph.D.
Director, Instructional Technology Services
Minnesota State University Moorhead USA
http://www.mnstate.edu/ficek/EduLearn/edulearn.pptx
Page 26
Verbs added to Bloom’shttp://edorigami.wikispaces.com