Date post: | 31-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | charles-wilkins |
View: | 214 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Education and Occupation as Factors Affecting
Longevity and Healthy of Chinese Elderly
LI Jianmin
Institute of Population and Development
Nanakai [email protected]
Questions
Why some people are healthier and more longevity than the others in the same cohort?
Are there any differences in life and health among the people who are different in social and economic characteristics?
Aim of this Study
This paper studied the influences of social and economic conditions on the longevity and healthy of Chinese elders.
Considering the availability and consistency of the data, this paper use educational attainments and occupation as the basic indexes to judge the forepassed living conditions of the elderly, because that both education and occupation have the function of social stratification.
Generally speaking, there are five kinds of factors inflecting people’s life, including:
Biologic or genic factors; Social and economic factors; Scientific and technologic factors; Individual life style and behavior mode; Accidental events.
Time Effects Time is a very important variable in research
of human’s longevity. Compared with time dimension, genic factor is an invariable factor, and the relation of life style and behavior mode and time is not clear or exact, but say the least of it, social and economic factors, scientific and technologic factors, and accident events are all the dependent variables of time.
Figure 1. Age-specific Suvival Ratio for Male Elderly
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
65 70 75 80 85
1982-1990
1990-2000
Figure 2. Age-specific Survival Ratio for Female Elderly
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
65 70 75 80 85
1982-1990
1990-2000
Hypothesis
The more the educational attainments the elderly had, the better the living conditions of their parental families;
The more the educational attainments the elderly had, the better their occupation and the living conditions they have;
Hypothesis
The more the educational attainments the elderly had, the better their occupation and the more the income they had, and then the better the life they have after retirement;
The better the living condition, education and occupation the elderly had, the better medical service they get;
Hypothesis
The better the education and occupation the elderly had, the more advantage their descendants have in their human capital investment and career development, then the living conditions of the elderly are better.
Analytic Framework
Educational attainments and occupation are only two explain variables to be used in analysis directly in this paper because of the limit of the data attainability.
The functions of the other variables in the analytical framework can only be decided by knowledge, as the judge from the hypothesis above.
Analytic Framework for the Relationship betweenEducation /Occupation and Longevity/Healthy of the Elderly
Parental Family
Family
Occupation
+
+
+
+
+
+
Living Condition
Longevity& Healthy
Medical & Medicine
Living Condition
Income
IndividualBehavior
+
Education
The data of “The Healthy Longevity Survey in China” (HLS) by Research Group of Healthy Longevity in China in 1998 and 2000;
The data of censuses of China in 1982,1990,and 2000.
The samples of LHS in 1998 are the elderly aged
80 + who were 64 + in 1982. So the elders aged
64 + in 1982 as the population for the samples
aged 80+ in 1998, because the proportion of the
elders aged 80 and over in 1982 who are still
alive in 1988 is very low.
That means that the start of the analysis is not
the whole born cohorts of the elderly who were
older than 80 in 1998 ,but the cohorts of those
who were still living older than 63 in 1982.
Conversion Standards of Educational Attainments
Years of Schooling Education Attainments
0-2 years Illiteracy & Semi-Illiteracy
3-6 years Primary School
7-9 years Middle School
10-12 years High School
13 years and above College and over
Distributions of the Elderly by Educational Attainments
In HLS and Census of China (%)
Educational
Attainments
Male Elderly Aged 80+ Female Elderly Aged 80+
HLS1998
HLS2000
Census2000
LHS1998
LHS2000
Census2000
Illiteracy&Semi-Illiteracy 52.32 50.68 50.82 92.06 90.76 87.58
Primary School 30.36 32.60 37.53 4.90 6.25 10.74
Middle School 7.16 7.01 7.83 1.25 1.44 1.00
High School 4.66 5.36 2.57 1.08 0.99 0.45
College and above 5.50 4.34 1.26 0.71 0.56 0.23
About occupation:
The definition of occupation used in HLS refers
to the main occupation the elderly concerned
had before 60 years old. Those aged 80-99 in
1998 reached their age of 60 was during the
period 1959-1978. During that period of China
the people rarely had opportunities to change
their jobs, especially for the people who were
50 years old and over.
The method applied in this study is cohort analysis,
by which to investigate the differentials in the life
experiences of cohorts.
To calculate the percentage distributions of the
elderly aged 64 + in 1982 and the elderly aged 80 +
in 1998 in the same cohort by educational
attainments and occupations, respectively.
To calculate the ratios of the two distributions by
educational attainments and occupation,
respectively.
The logic of the methodology is that if no
or litter difference exits among the elderly
who are different in educational
attainments and occupation, two series of
distributions has no or litter difference,
namely the ratio is equal to 1 or close to 1.
Vise versa, it can testify the essential
influences of education and occupation to
survive and longevity.
1949 1966 1978 1982 19981937
85 +
69 - 7365 - 6924 - 28 36 - 40 53 - 57 85 - 891909-1913
74- 7870 - 7429 - 33 41 - 45 58 - 62 90 - 941904-1908
79 - 8375 - 7934 - 38 46 - 50 63 - 67 95 - 991899-1903
84 - 8880 - 8439 - 43 51 - 55 68 - 72 100 -1041894-1898
89 +44 + 56 + 73 + 105 + -1893
64 - 6860 - 6419 - 23 31 - 35 48 - 52 80 - 84
Year of Birth
1914-1918
Japanese Invade
Found of P.R.China GCR Start GCR End Reform HLS
Distribution of Male Elderly Aged 64+ in 1982 and 80+ in 1998 by Educational Attainments (percent)
EducationalAttainments
Total Urban Rural
Cens.
1982
HLS
1998
Cens.
1982
HLS
1998
Cens.
1982
HLS
1998
Illiteracy &Semi-Illiteracy 53.79 52.32 35.04 39.23 59.94 61.05
Primary School 35.29 30.36 41.37 32.42 33.29 28.98
Middle School 7.59 7.16 14.53 9.54 5.31 5.57
High School 2.32 4.66 5.42 6.81 1.30 3.23
College and above 1.02 5.50 3.63 12.00 0.16 1.17
Distribution of Female Elderly Aged 64+ in 1982 and 80+ in 1998 by Educational Attainments (percent)
EducationalAttainments
Total Urban Rural
Cens.
1982
HLS
1998
Cens.
1982
HLS
1998
Cens.
1982
HLS
1998
Illiteracy &Semi-Illiteracy 92.18 92.06 81.77 84.46 94.51 96.34
Primary School 6.24 4.90 13.06 8.70 5.07 2.75
Middle School 0.95 1.25 2.86 2.59 0.33 0.50
High School 0.46 1.08 1.65 2.54 0.08 0.26
College and above 0.16 0.71 0.65 1.71 0.01 0.15
Ratios of Male Elderly 64+ in 1982 and 80+ in1998 by Educational Attainments
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
I l l i teracy & Semi
Pr i mary School
Mi ddl e School
Hi gh School
Col l ege & Over
HLS
Census
Ratios of Female Elderly 64+ in 1982 and80+ in 1998 by Educational Attainments
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
I l l i teracy & Semi
Pr i mary School
Mi ddl e School
Hi gh School
Col l ege & Over
HLS
Census
Ratios of Urban Male Elderly 64+ in 1982 and80+ in 1998 by Educational Attainments
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
I l l i teracy & Semi
Pr i mary School
Mi ddl e School
Hi gh School
Col l ege & Over
HLS
Census
Ratios of Urban Female Elderly 64+ in 1982and 80+ in 1998 by Educational Attainments
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
I l l i teracy & Semi
Pr i mary School
Mi ddl e School
Hi gh School
Col l ege & OverHLSCensus
Ratios of Rural Male Elderly 64+ in 1982 and80+ in 1998 by Educational Attainments
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
I l l i teracy & Semi
Pr i mary School
Mi ddl e School
Hi gh School
Col l ege & Over
HLS
Census
Ratios of Rural Female Elderly 64+ in 1982and 80+ in 1998 by Educational Attainments
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
I l l i teracy & Semi
Pri mary School
Mi ddl e School
Hi gh School
Col l ege & OverHLSCensus
The Ratios of Distribution of the Male Elderly by Educational Attainments in 1982 and 1998 (1982=1)
Age
in
1982
Educational AttainmentsAge
In
1998
Illiteracy & Semi-
Illiteracy
Primary
School
Middle
School
High
School
College and over
64-68 0.706 1.109 1.375 4.321 14.007 80-84
69-73 0.765 1.107 1.521 4.202 11.836 85-89
74-78 0.805 1.128 1.652 3.980 8.596 90-94
79-83 0.804 1.141 1.886 3.928 10.547 95-99
84-89 0.902 1.124 1.502 1.241 8.222100-10
5
The Ratios of Distribution of the Female Elderly by Educational Attainments in 1982 and 1998 (1982=1)
Age in
1982
Educational AttainmentsAge
in
1998
Illiteracy & Semi-
Illiteracy
Primary
School
Middle
School
High
School
College and over
64-68 0.909 2.982 1.972 1.660 2.848 80-84
69-73 0.919 3.443 2.683 2.115 4.382 85-89
74-78 0.940 3.133 3.165 5.616 5.538 90-94
79-83 0.947 4.141 4.779 7.719 12.164 95-99
84-89 0.973 2.587 1.687 8.994 5.397100-10
5
Distribution of Female Elderly by Their Husbands’ Educational Attainments in 1998 (percent)
Age
Educational Attainments of HusbandIlliteracy & Semi-Illiteracy
Primary School
Middle School
High School
College and over
80-84 54.18 29.56 7.47 4.73 4.07
85-89 61.73 26.53 5.07 3.20 3.47
90-94 59.00 30.87 3.81 4.17 2.15
95-99 67.09 24.87 3.84 2.86 1.38
100-105 67.80 24.60 2.59 2.83 2.18
106+ 69.23 20.51 5.13 2.56 2.56
Total 63.49 26.75 4.28 3.42 2.58
A. Relationship of education and
longevity of the elderly Regardless of male and female among the
different ages, the ratios for illiterate and semi-illiterate distribution are all less than 1, while other education degree’s ratio is all more than 1. It testifies that the higher education degree, the higher probability to survival.
A. Relationship of education and longevity of the elderly
In two distributing ratios, the difference among the male elderly is obvious more than the female. It indicates the influence of education to the male’s life is more than the female.
A. Relationship of education and longevity of the elderly
The female’s life has close correlation with her spouse’s educational attainments, whose influence is even more than her own educational attainments That is because, to the elderly female, her living condition depends on her spouse’s earning capability and social and economic status of the family they married into.
Distribution of Self-rated Satisfaction with Lifeby Years of Schooling
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
0y 1-2 y 3-4y 5-6y 7-9y 10-12y 13+y
Very bad
Bad
So-so
Good
Very good
Figure 6. Distribution of Self-rated Health of theElderly by Years of Schooling
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
0y 1-2y 3-4y 5-6y 7-9y 10-12y 13+y
Very bad
Bad
So- so
Good
Very good
Correlation Coefficient between Self-rated with Life as
“Very Good” of the Elderly and Their Years of Schooling
Age Group
Urban Male
Urban Female
Rural Male
Rural Female
Total .792 .734 .524 -.526
80-89 .898 .699 .319 -.499
90-99 .852 .059 .567 -.828
100-105 .812 -.017 .766 .071
Correlation Coefficient Between Years of Schooling and Status of Health of the Elderly
Status of health Male Female
Total Urban Rural Total Urban RuralVery good in health .548 .582 -.185 .373 .546 -.559
Have no chronic diseases -.764 -.733 -.406 -.746 -.638 -.456
Fully independent in daily living
-.490 -.224 -.253 .226 .333 -.043
Complete cognitive ability .847 .695 .887 .852 .807 .836
B. Relationship of education and Health of the elderly
As a whole, the relationship of elderly’s education attainments and their self-rated with life, health condition and cognitive ability is positive correlative. But it is not true for elderly in the rural areas, especially for female.
For elderly male schooling years is negative correlative to the fully independent in the daily living. That is possibly because the more educated were more engaged in the brainwork while the less educated were more engaged in the physical work.
Distribution of Male Elderly Aged 64+ in 1982 and 80+ in 1998 by Occupation (percent)
Occupation
Total Urban Rural
Cens.
1982
HLS
1998
Cens.
1982
HLS
1998
Cens.
1982
HLS
1998
Administrator 1.16 6.45 6.43 12.60 0.29 2.43
Professional and technical 1.94 8.59 7.70 16.68 0.76 3.29
Industrial worker 2.84 12.36 8.28 23.60 1.55 5.01
Commercial and service worker
7.05 13.89 16.37 19.81 3.27 10.01
Peasant 86.98 56.4 51.12 23.67 94.12 77.83
Other 0.02 2.31 0.09 3.64 0.00 1.43
Distribution of Female Elderly Aged 64+ in 1982 and 80+ in 1998 by Occupation (percent)
OccupationTotal Urban Rural
Cens.
1982
HLS
1998
Cens.
1982
HLS
1998
Cens.
1982
HLS
1998
Administrator 0.57 0.95 5.09 2.39 0.03 0.31
Professional and technical 0.67 2.66 4.17 6.91 0.32 0.78
Industrial worker 2.03 4.63 4.50 12.31 0.75 1.25
Commercial and service worker
4.44 8.81 30.40 19.93 1.31 3.90
Peasant 92.28 81.16 55.78 54.12 97.67 93.09
Other 0.01 1.79 0.07 4.34 0.00 0.66
Ratios of Distributions of Elderly Aged 60-64 in 1982 and 80-84 in 1998 by Occupation (1982=1)
OccupationTotal Urban Rural
Male Female Male Female Male Female
Administrator 3.331 0.584 1.344 0.201 3.801 0.703
Professional and technical
4.584 2.192 2.188 0.839 3.375 2.183
Industrial worker 3.844 2.889 2.050 1.498 2.946 1.270
Commercial and service worker
2.418 2.110 0.887 0.869 4.012 2.003
Peasant 0.557 0.791 0.400 0.876 0.823 0.938
Other 50.895 78.780 14.785 24.797 160.42 138.35
C. Relationship of Occupation and Longevity of the elderly
As the whole, the higher occupation status the old male engaged in before, the higher their survival probability to longevity. If we neglect the group of “others”, “professional and technician” has the highest survival ratio, and then worker and administrator, and the survival ratio for peasants is the lowest.
C. Relationship of Occupation and Longevity of the elderly
As the whole for female, neglecting the group of “others”, worker has the highest survival ratio, and then professional and technician, and peasants have the lowest.
The most deservingly noticed a phenomenon is that no matter who are in urban or rural, administrators have the lowest survival probability to longevity.
C. Relationship of Occupation and Longevity of the elderly
There is much difference in survival ratios for different group of old people between the urban and the rural.
For male in urban, the highest survival ratio belongs to professional, technician and industrial workers, the ratio for commercial and service workers is the lowest.
C. Relationship of Occupation and Longevity of the elderly
For female in rural, people engaged in commercial service has the highest survival ratio, and then administrator and professional and technician.
For male elderly, the diversity of occupation distribution ratios is more than that within old female, which means the influence that occupation stratification makes on survive for male elderly is more than that for female elderly.
C. Relationship of Occupation and Longevity of the elderly
In all categories, the old belong to the group of “others” have the highest survival probability. However, we still should considerately look on this result, because we still don’t know the detail conditions of the two “others” categories in the census of 1982 and LHS of 1998.
C. Relationship of Occupation and Longevity of the elderly
The influence of spouse’s occupation on survival probability to advanced age for female is more notable. It is observed that female whose husband engaged in administrative has the highest survival probability, and then the wife of professional and technician. That means the occupation of husband is a very important factor for wife’s life.
In this paper we proved that social and economic factors could make much importance on people’s longevity and health, in this point, education and occupation are two important explaining variables.
This research shows that the higher people’s education degree, the higher whose occupation has the rank in occupation stratification, and the higher their survival ratio is.
While for China’s current old female, their husbands’ education degree and occupation make more notable influences on their health and longevity.
Actually, education and occupation are not direct factors affecting people’s health and lifespan; they must apply force through other approximate variables. For example, education can not only enhance people’s income-earning abilities, also can increase people’s knowledge and understanding on health, and also the abilities of using medical treatment conditions. These factors all can enhance the health of people and their families.
Before reform in China, differentials in education attainments and status of occupation implicated the differentials in the rights to have benefits and welfare from national public recourses. In other words, the people who have higher education degree mostly have occupation in formal sector while these people can attain “institutional benefits” and “institutional protection” which cannot be got by the people of informal sectors.
With much influences education and occupation put on people’s health and longevity, we can make sure that the age of Chinese longevity has come, that’s because the opportunities of people’s education and social mobility are enlarged continuously, and also there are rapid developments in social and economic developments in China.