Date post: | 29-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | candice-chase |
View: | 222 times |
Download: | 1 times |
EEducation ducation FFor or AAllllFast Track Fast Track InitiativeInitiative
Rosemary BellewRosemary Bellew
Manager, FTI SecretariatManager, FTI Secretariat
EFA – Fast Track Initiative 2
Origin of FTI Origin of FTI
What is FTI – objectives and What is FTI – objectives and componentscomponents
Implementation progress Implementation progress ChallengesChallenges Discussion questionsDiscussion questions
EFA – Fast Track Initiative 3
OriginOrigin Jomtien – World Declaration on Education for AllJomtien – World Declaration on Education for All
» UPE by 2000, over100 million out of schoolUPE by 2000, over100 million out of school World Education Forum April 2000, Dakar World Education Forum April 2000, Dakar
» Increase aid and predictabilityIncrease aid and predictability» Sector-wide approaches, more effective donor coordinationSector-wide approaches, more effective donor coordination» Regular monitoring at country and international levelRegular monitoring at country and international level
MDGs adopted September 2000MDGs adopted September 2000 Monterrey Consensus, March 2002 International Monterrey Consensus, March 2002 International
Finance and Development Conference, state headsFinance and Development Conference, state heads» Mobilizing and increasing effective use of aid (and trade) to Mobilizing and increasing effective use of aid (and trade) to
reach MDGsreach MDGs» Countries with sound policies and programsCountries with sound policies and programs» Good governance, increased accountabilityGood governance, increased accountability
Rome Declaration on Harmonization February Rome Declaration on Harmonization February 2003 to improve aid effectiveness2003 to improve aid effectiveness
EFA – Fast Track Initiative 4
The FTI is …The FTI is … Global Partnership of education donors Global Partnership of education donors
(25 bilateral and multilateral donors), (25 bilateral and multilateral donors), endorsed by World Bank/IMF Development endorsed by World Bank/IMF Development Committee and G-8 Committee and G-8
It aims toIt aims to Support countries to achieve the MDG Support countries to achieve the MDG
for completion of primary education for for completion of primary education for all, through increased aid byall, through increased aid by
Putting into practice the principles of Putting into practice the principles of the Monterrey Consensus and Rome the Monterrey Consensus and Rome DeclarationDeclaration
EFA – Fast Track Initiative 5
Why FTI? Dramatically faster Why FTI? Dramatically faster progress is needed in some regions progress is needed in some regions Trends in PCR by RegionTrends in PCR by Region
40
60
80
100
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015
Pri
ma
ry C
om
ple
tio
n R
ate
(%
) -
po
pu
lati
on
we
igh
ted
AFR
EAP
ECA
MNA
LCR
SAR
Source: 1990: B. Bruns, A. Mingat & R. Rakotomalal (2003) 'AchievingUniversal Primary Education by 2015: A Chance for Every Child'2001: WDI database July 2004 (using the most recent of 2000 to 2002 data for each country)
Data interpolated from 1990 to 2001 Linear projections based on 1990 and 2001 data
AFR
SAR
LCR MNA
ECA
EFA – Fast Track Initiative 6
Projected trends in PCR for some Projected trends in PCR for some FTI countries FTI countries (projections use a line of best fit (projections use a line of best fit
between data points)between data points)
0
20
40
60
80
100
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015Pri
mar
y C
om
ple
tio
n R
ate
(%)
- p
op
ula
tio
n w
eig
hte
d
Source: WDI database July 2004
Data interpolated betw een points Linear projections based on line of best f it
Burkina Faso
Guyana
Honduras
Ghana
Gambia
GuineaBurkina Faso
Guinea
Gambia
Ghana
Honduras
Guyana
EFA – Fast Track Initiative 7
…many countries are off track
Progress Rating Countries in WDI
database
Percent(%)
On track - Achieved UPC - On track
634023
43%27%16%
Off track - Off track - Seriously off track
724923
50%34%16%
No data available 10 7%
TOTAL 145 100%Source: Linear projections based on 1990 to 2002 data from the WDI database July 2004, includes low and middle income countries
EFA – Fast Track Initiative 8
Many countries are off trackMany countries are off track
Low-
Income Countries %
Lower -Middle Income % Total %
On Track 20 31 29 63 49 45 Achieved UPC 8 13 22 48 30 27 On-track 12 19 7 15 19 17Off-track 40 63 16 35 56 51 Off Track 23 36 12 26 35 32 Seriously off-track 17 27 4 9 21 19No data 4 6 1 2 5 5Total 64 100 46 100 110 100
EFA – Fast Track Initiative 9
Aid not as effective as it could beAid not as effective as it could be
Multiple donor requirements Multiple donor requirements increase transaction costsincrease transaction costs
Project approaches do not address Project approaches do not address systemic issues and policies systemic issues and policies sufficientlysufficiently
Donor cycles do not always fit with Donor cycles do not always fit with Government planning and budgeting Government planning and budgeting cyclescycles
Funding does not always match Funding does not always match Government prioritiesGovernment priorities
EFA – Fast Track Initiative 10
The FTI compact and The FTI compact and eligibilityeligibility
Donors commit to increase aid and its Donors commit to increase aid and its predictability to scale up programs to predictability to scale up programs to achieve the MDG for primary education, achieve the MDG for primary education, based on country performancebased on country performance
EligibilityEligibility All low-income countriesAll low-income countries with with
PRSP or equivalentPRSP or equivalent
Sound education policies and sector program, Sound education policies and sector program, endorsed by country donorsendorsed by country donors
Commitment to monitor key indicators Commitment to monitor key indicators (Indicative Framework)(Indicative Framework)
EFA – Fast Track Initiative 11
EFA Indicative FrameworkEFA Indicative Framework Benchmarks drawn from analysis of successful
EFA countries. Crucial for the long-term sustainability of MDG progress:
– Domestic financing effort– Actions to improve service delivery
1) government spending on education – 20% of 1) government spending on education – 20% of budgetbudget
2) spending on primary education – 50% of 2) spending on primary education – 50% of education budget education budget
3) teacher salary – about 3.5 times GDP per capita3) teacher salary – about 3.5 times GDP per capita4) pupil-teacher ratio – about 40:14) pupil-teacher ratio – about 40:15) non-teacher salary spending – 33% of recurrent 5) non-teacher salary spending – 33% of recurrent
spendingspending6)6) average repetition rate – 10% or loweraverage repetition rate – 10% or lower7)7) annual hours of instruction – 850 or moreannual hours of instruction – 850 or more8)8) unit construction costs - $10,000 or lower unit construction costs - $10,000 or lower
EFA – Fast Track Initiative 12
Main Objective 1 Main Objective 1
Increase financing and Increase financing and predictabiltypredictabilty Regular channelsRegular channels ““Donor Orphans” -- Catalytic Donor Orphans” -- Catalytic
FundFund Fund for Preparation of Fund for Preparation of
Education Sector PlansEducation Sector Plans
EFA – Fast Track Initiative 13
Main Objective 2Main Objective 2
Channel aid more Channel aid more efficiently and effectivelyefficiently and effectively Donor collaboration and Donor collaboration and
harmonizationharmonization More flexible financing More flexible financing Recurrent costsRecurrent costs
EFA – Fast Track Initiative 14
EFA-FTI CataEFA-FTI Catalylytic Fundtic Fund (CF)(CF)
Two/three year Two/three year transitional transitional financingfinancing
Low income countries Low income countries withwith
Insufficient financing (due to Insufficient financing (due to insufficient donors) insufficient donors) thatthat
Meet the EFA-FTI eligibility criteriaMeet the EFA-FTI eligibility criteria
EFA – Fast Track Initiative 15
ContributorsContributors to the CF to the CF2004-2004-20072007
Source: Report of Committee decisions of the first meeting of the Strategy Committee for the Catalytic Fund – Oslo, November 22, 2003 and subsequent Administrative Agreements
2004 2005 2006 2007 Total
Netherlands 30 52 58 70 210
Norway 3 3 3 3 12
UK 0 0 9 9 17
Italy 2 2
Belgium 1 1 1 1 5
TOTAL 37 56 71 82 246
EFA – Fast Track Initiative 16
Country Allocations (US $ Country Allocations (US $ million)million)
CountryCountry 20032003 20042004 20052005
YemenYemen 1010 1010
NigerNiger 55 88 88
NicaraguaNicaragua 77 77
The GambiaThe Gambia 44 44
GuyanaGuyana 44 44
MauritaniaMauritania 55 22 22
TotalTotal 1010 3535 3535
17 EFA – Fast Track Initiative
MauritaniaThe Gambia Guinea Niger Ghana Burkina Faso Zambia Uganda Tanzania EthiopiaFrance UK* France Belgium France Belgium Finland Belgium Belgium Belgium
Germany France UK France Ireland France Canada Finland USA Norway USA Netherlands Netherlands Ireland Finland France
Sweden Norway Netherlands France IrelandUSA UK Norway Ireland Netherlands
USA UK Netherlands NorwayUSA Sweden Sweden
UK UKUSA USA
Albania Guyana Nicaragua Yemen Vietnam Honduras BoliviaNorway France Belgium Canada Belgium
USA Germany France Germany NetherlandsNetherlands Norway Sweden Norway
UK* UK USA SwedenUSA
DRC Nigeria Pakistan India BangladeshBelgium France Germany Netherlands BelgiumFrance UK UK Sweden Canada
USA USA UK NetherlandsUSA sweden
UKUSA
EFA FTI - Priority Countries for Donors - AFRICA
EFA FTI - Priority Countries for Donors - ECA, LAC, MNA
EFA FTI - Priority Countries for Donors - ANALYTICAL FAST TRACK
EFA – Fast Track Initiative 18
FTI – first 23 countriesFTI – first 23 countries Two transparent criteria:
For invitation: For invitation: Poverty Reduction Strategy Poverty Reduction Strategy For endorsement for funding: Primary Education Sector Plan For endorsement for funding: Primary Education Sector Plan
agreed with donors supporting education in the countryagreed with donors supporting education in the country
23 Countries invited: 18 in FTI proper; 5 in 23 Countries invited: 18 in FTI proper; 5 in “analytical track”“analytical track”
AlbaniaEthiopiaThe Gambia
BangladeshPakistanIndia
D.R. CongoNigeria
VietnamTanzaniaMozambique
ZambiaYemenGuinea
UgandaGuyanaNiger
GhanaNicaraguaMauritania
BoliviaHondurasBurkina Faso
17 millionchildren out of school
50 million childrenout of school
EFA – Fast Track Initiative 19
FTI Progress to DateFTI Progress to Date
Endorsed Endorsed 11/0211/02 NicaraguaNicaragua HondurasHonduras Guyana Guyana Burkina Burkina
FasoFaso NigerNiger MauritaniaMauritania GuineaGuinea
Endorsed in Endorsed in 20032003 The GambiaThe Gambia MozambiqueMozambique YemenYemen VietnamVietnam
Endorsed in Endorsed in 2004 2004 GhanaGhana
EFA – Fast Track Initiative 20
ResultsResults Increased focus on completionIncreased focus on completion Improved the linkages between central and Improved the linkages between central and
field levels in donor agenciesfield levels in donor agencies Greater partnershipGreater partnership Increased attention to sector programs and Increased attention to sector programs and
non-project financing mechanismsnon-project financing mechanisms Increased aid Increased aid
EFA – Fast Track Initiative 21
Trends in aid – Bilateral ODA & Trends in aid – Bilateral ODA & World Bank commitmentsWorld Bank commitments
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
Millions(current US$)
Bilateral ODACommitments
World BankEducation NewCommitments
Source: World Bank & OECD CRS database
EFA – Fast Track Initiative 22
Trends in Bilateral AID in selected Trends in Bilateral AID in selected FTI countriesFTI countries
Bilateral ODA Commitments for Basic Education (US $ 000)
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
Burkina Faso
Honduras
Niger
Niger
Honduras
Burkina Faso
EFA – Fast Track Initiative 23
Trends in Bilateral Aid % increaseTrends in Bilateral Aid % increase
0
100
200
300
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
Bila
tera
l OD
A C
om
mit
men
ts f
or
Bas
ic
Ed
uca
tio
n In
dex
(19
97=1
00%
)
Source: OECD CRS database
Honduras
Burkina Faso
Niger
EFA – Fast Track Initiative 24
Other On Going WorkOther On Going Work Harmonization Working Group Harmonization Working Group
Country level donor harmonization monitoring indicatorsCountry level donor harmonization monitoring indicators Finance Working GroupFinance Working Group
Accounting for Budget SupportAccounting for Budget Support Estimating the Global Financing GapEstimating the Global Financing Gap Impact of finance modalities (GBS and SBS) on education Impact of finance modalities (GBS and SBS) on education
outcomesoutcomes Communications Working GroupCommunications Working Group
MessagingMessaging Fund for Preparation of Education Sector PlansFund for Preparation of Education Sector Plans
EFA – Fast Track Initiative 25
ChallengesChallenges
Country level Country level Predictable aid commitmentsPredictable aid commitments Monitoring the compact – gaps, Monitoring the compact – gaps,
financial flows and country financial flows and country progress progress
ExpansionExpansion
EFA – Fast Track Initiative 26
DiscussionDiscussion What have been your What have been your
experiences with FTI?experiences with FTI? How can FTI support country How can FTI support country
level processes ?level processes ? What value added can FTI What value added can FTI
bring?bring?
EFA – Fast Track Initiative 27
Thank You for Your Thank You for Your AttentionAttention
www1.worldbank.org/education/efafti/www1.worldbank.org/education/efafti/
Rosemary Bellew # 34836Rosemary Bellew # 34836