+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Education Policy Committee

Education Policy Committee

Date post: 24-Feb-2016
Category:
Upload: novia
View: 37 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Education Policy Committee . Kati Haycock President The Education Trust . ACHIEVEMENT IN AMERICA: Where Are We? What Can We Do? Critical Steps for Nevada. Las Vegas Metro Chamber of Commerce Las Vegas, NV April, 2013. America: Two Enduring Stories. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
164
© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST Education Policy Committee Kati Haycock President The Education Trust
Transcript
Page 1: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Education Policy Committee

Kati HaycockPresident

The Education Trust

Page 2: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

ACHIEVEMENT IN AMERICA: Where Are We? What Can We Do? Critical Steps for Nevada

Las Vegas Metro Chamber of CommerceLas Vegas, NV April, 2013

Page 3: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

America: Two Enduring Stories

Page 4: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

1. Land of Opportunity:

Work hard, and you can become anything you

want to be.

Page 5: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

2. Generational Advancement:

Through hard work, each generation of parents can assure a better life — and

better education — for their children.

Page 6: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Powerful narratives.Fast slipping away.

Page 7: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Within the U.S., income inequality has been rising.

Page 8: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Earnings among the lowest income families have declined, even amid big increases at the

top.

Source: The College Board, “Trends in College Pricing 2011” (New York: College Board, 2010), Figure 16A.

Page 9: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Note: Gini coefficient ranges from 0 to 1, where 0 indicates total income equality and 1 indicates total income inequality.

Instead of being the most equal, the U.S. has the third highest income inequality among OECD

nations.

United States

Source: United Nations, U.N. data, http://data.un.org/DocumentData.aspx?q=gini&id=271: 2011

Page 10: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Not just wages, but mobility as well.

Page 11: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

U.S. intergenerational mobility was increasing until 1980, but has sharply declined since.

Source: Daniel Aaronson and Bhashkar Mazumder. Intergenerational Economic Mobility in the U.S.,1940 to 2000. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago WP 2005-12: Dec. 2005.

1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 20000

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.4 0.35 0.34 0.330.46

0.58

Earn

ings

Ela

stici

ty

The falling elasticity meant increased economic mobility until 1980. Since then, the elasticity has risen, and mobility has slowed.

Page 12: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Now, instead of being the “land of opportunity,” the U.S. has one of lowest rates

of intergenerational mobility.

Source: Tom Hertz, “Understanding Mobility in America” (Washington, D.C.: Center for American Progress, 2006).

Page 13: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

At the macro level, better and more equal education is

not the only answer.But at the individual level, it really

is.

Page 14: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

More Education=More Income

Julian and Kominski, “Education and Synthetic Work-Life Earnings Estimates,” U.S. Census Bureau, 2011.

Note: Data include full-time, year-round workers, those working less than full-time year-round, and those who did not work.

Page 15: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Source:

More Education=Less Unemployment

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Table A-4, http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t04htm

Page 16: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

More education also helps improve other things we

value.

Page 17: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

More Education=More Likely to Vote

U.S. Census Bureau, “Voting and Registration in the Election of November 2008,” May 2010Note: Data include both those who are and are not registered to vote.

Page 18: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, “Volunteering in the United States 2009” (2010)

Note: Data represent percentage of total population that reported volunteering from September 2008 to September 2009

Page 19: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Source:

More Education=More likely to be in “Very Good” or “Excellent” Health

Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Commission for a Healthier America, 2009

Page 20: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Gallup, “Strong Relationship Between Income and Mental Health” (2007)

Page 21: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

What schools and colleges do, in other words, is hugely important to

our economy, our democracy, and our society.

Page 22: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

So, how are we doing?

Page 23: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

First, some good news.After more than a decade of fairly flat achievement and stagnant or

growing gaps in K-12, we appear to be turning the corner with our

elementary students.

Page 24: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Source:

Fourth-Grade Reading: NAEP LTTRecord performance with gap narrowing

150

160

170

180

190

200

210

220

230

240

250

1971* 1975* 1980* 1984* 1988* 1990* 1992* 1994* 1996* 1999* 2004 2008

Aver

age S

cale

Sco

re

9-Year Olds – NAEP Reading

African American Latino White

NAEP 2008 Trends in Academic Progress, NCES*Denotes previous assessment format

Page 25: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Source:

Fourth-Grade Math: NAEP LTTRecord performance with gap narrowing

Source: NAEP 2008 Trends in Academic Progress, NCES*Denotes previous assessment format

Page 26: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Looked at differently(and on the “other” NAEP

exam)…

Page 27: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Source:

1996 NAEP Grade 4 Math

NAEP Data Explorer, NCES

Page 28: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Source:

2011 NAEP Grade 4 Math

NAEP Data Explorer, NCES

Page 29: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Middle grades are up, too.

Page 30: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Source:

Over the last decade, all groups have steadily improved and gaps have narrowed

NAEP Data Explorer, NCES (Proficient Scale Score = 299)*Accommodations not permitted

Page 31: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Clearly, much more remains to be done in elementary and

middle school.Too many students still enter high

school way behind.

Page 32: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

But at least we have some traction on elementary and

middle school problems.The same is NOT true

of our high schools.

Page 33: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Source:

Achievement is flat in reading.

NAEP Long-Term Trends, NCES (2004)

Page 34: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Source:

Math achievement is flat over time.

National Center for Education Statistics, NAEP 2008 Trends in Academic Progress* Denotes previous assessment format

Page 35: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

And gaps between groups are mostly wider today than in the late

80s and early 90s.

Page 36: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Source:

12th-Grade Reading: No progress, gaps wider than 1988

NAEP 2008 Trends in Academic Progress, NCES*Denotes previous assessment format

Page 37: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Source:

12th-Grade Math: Results mostly flat, gaps same or

widening

NAEP 2008 Trends in Academic Progress, NCES*Denotes previous assessment format

Page 38: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

And these are the students who remain in school through 12th grade.

Page 39: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Source: National Center for Education Statistics, “Public School Graduates and Dropouts from the Common Core of Data: School Year 2008-09” (2011).

Students of color are less likely to graduate from high school on time.

Page 40: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Moreover, no matter how you cut the data, our students

aren’t doing well compared with their peers in other

countries.

Page 41: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Source:

Of 34 OECD countries, the U.S. ranks 12th in reading literacy.

U.S.A. OECD

Higher than U.S. average Not measurably different from U.S. average Lower than U.S. average

“Highlights from PISA 2009,” NCES, 2010

Page 42: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Source: “Highlights from PISA 2009,” NCES, 2010

Higher than U.S. average Not measurably different from U.S. average Lower than U.S. average

Of 34 OECD countries, the U.S. ranks 17th in science.

U.S.A.

Page 43: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Source: “Highlights from PISA 2009,” NCES, 2010

Higher than U.S. average Not measurably different from U.S. average Lower than U.S. average

Of 34 OECD countries, the U.S. ranks 25th in math.

U.S.A.

Page 44: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Only place we rank high?

Inequality.

Page 45: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Source:

Among OECD countries, the U.S. has the fourth largest science gap between high-SES and low-SES students.

PISA 2006 Results, OECD, table 4.8b

U.S.A. OECD

Page 46: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Source:

Among OECD countries, the U.S. has the fifth largest reading gap between high-SES and low-

SES students.

PISA 2009 Results, OECD, Table II.3.1

U.S.A. OECD

Page 47: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

We used to make up for at least some of this by sending

more of our students to college than anybody else.

Page 48: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Note: Adults with a postsecondary degree include those who have completed either a tertiary-type B program (programs that last for at least two years, are skill-based, and prepare students for direct entry into the labor market) or a tertiary-type A program (programs that last at least three, but usually four, years, are largely theory-based, and provide qualifications for entry into highly-skilled professions or advanced research programs)

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Education at a Glance 2011 (2011)

Though no longer #1, we’re still relatively strong in overall educational attainment

Page 49: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Kore

aCa

nada

Japa

nIre

land

Norw

ayNe

w Zeala

ndUn

ited

King

dom

Austr

alia

Denm

ark

Luxe

mbo

urg

Fran

ceIsr

ael

Belgi

umSw

eden

Unite

d St

ates

Neth

erlan

dsSw

itzer

land

Finlan

dSp

ainOE

CD av

erag

eEs

toni

aIce

land

Polan

dCh

ileSlo

veni

aGr

eece

Germ

any

Hung

ary

Portu

gal

Austr

iaSlo

vak R

epub

licCz

ech

Repu

blic

Mex

ico Italy

Turk

ey

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Percentage of residents aged 25-34 with a postsecondary degree

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Education at a Glance 2011 (2011)

Note: Adults with a postsecondary degree include those who have completed either a tertiary-type B program (programs that last for at least two years, are skill-based, and prepare students for direct entry into the labor market) or a tertiary-type A program (programs that last at least three, but usually four, years, are largely theory-based, and provide qualifications for entry into highly-skilled professions or advanced research programs)

But our world standing drops to 15th for younger adults

United StatesOECD Average

Page 50: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Kore

aPo

land

Fran

ceIre

land

Denm

ark

Luxe

mbo

urg

Chile

Norw

aySw

eden

Spain

Belgi

umPo

rtuga

lCa

nada

Japa

nUn

ited

King

dom

Austr

alia

Slove

nia

OECD

aver

age

New Ze

aland

Neth

erlan

dsIta

lySw

itzer

land

Gree

ceHu

ngar

ySlo

vak R

epub

licTu

rkey

Mex

icoIce

land

Czec

h Re

publ

icAu

stria

Finlan

dUn

ited

Stat

esGe

rman

yEs

toni

aIsr

ael0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Difference in percentage of residents aged 45-54 and those aged 25-34 with a postsecondary degree

Note: Adults with a postsecondary degree include those who have completed either a tertiary-type B program (programs that last for at least two years, are skill-based, and prepare students for direct entry into the labor market) or a tertiary-type A program (programs that last at least three, but usually four, years, are largely theory-based, and provide qualifications for entry into highly-skilled professions or advanced research programs)

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Education at a Glance 2011 (2011)

We’re near the bottom in intergenerational progress

OECD Average

United States

Page 51: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

That’s a quick look at the country as a whole. What

about Nevada?

Page 52: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

You’ve seen your state assessment and graduation

data before.

Page 53: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Students of Color Less than Half as Likely to Exceed State Reading Standards

Source: Nevada Department of Education

Page 54: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Students of Color 2-3 Times More Likely to Perform at Lowest Level in Math

Source: Nevada Department of Education

Page 55: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Students of Color More Likely to Fall Short of State Reading Standards in High School

Source: Nevada Department of Education

Page 56: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Low Graduation Rates for All Groups of Students

Source: NCES, “ Public School Graduates and Dropouts from the Common Core of Data: School Year 2009-10: First Look,” (2013), http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2013/2013309.pdf.

Page 57: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Source:

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Percent of NV ACT-Takers Meeting College-Ready Benchmarks

Page 58: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Source:

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Percent of NV ACT-Takers Meeting All Four College-Ready Benchmarks

Page 59: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

What about performance on the national assessment?

Page 60: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Page 61: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Page 62: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

But there is some good news here.

Page 63: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Nevada’s Students Improving Faster than National Average in Reading

National Public

Nevada

Florida

Georgia

Pennsylvania

Massachusetts

Maryland

Alabama

0 4 8 12 16 20

4

6

7

7

8

9

12

13

Students Overall – Grade 4 Reading (2003-2011)

Mean Scale Score Improvement, 2003-2011

Source: NAEP Data Explorer, NCES.

Page 64: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Latino Students in Nevada Improved at One of the Fastest

Rates Nationwide

National Public

Nevada

New Hampshire

Georgia

Massachusetts

Maryland

0 4 8 12 16 20

6

11

11

13

14

17

Latino Students – Grade 4 Reading (2003-2011)

Mean Scale Score Improvement, 2003-2011

Source: NAEP Data Explorer, NCES.

Page 65: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Low-Income Students in Nevada Improved Nearly Twice as Fast as Low-

Income Students Nationwide

National Public

Nevada

New Hampshire

Florida

New Jersey

Pennsylvania

Alabama

Maryland

0 4 8 12 16 20

6

10

10

11

12

13

16

16

Low-Income Students – Grade 4 Reading (2003-2011)

Mean Scale Score Improvement, 2003-2011

Source: NAEP Data Explorer, NCES.

Page 66: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Nevada’s Students Improving Faster than National Average in Math

National Public

Nevada

Maryland

New Mexico

Rhode Island

Hawaii

Massachusetts

New Jersey

Texas

Arkansas

0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28

7

10

10

11

11

12

12

13

13

13

Students Overall – Grade 8 Math (2003-2011)

Mean Scale Score Improvement, 2003-2011

Source: NAEP Data Explorer, NCES.

Page 67: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Latino Students in Nevada Improved at One of the Fastest

Rates Nationwide

National Public

Idaho

Nevada

Pennsylvania

Rhode Island

Texas

Delaware

Massachusetts

Arkansas

0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28

11

16

16

16

16

16

17

18

24

Latino Students – Grade 8 Math (2003-2011)

Mean Scale Score Improvement, 2003-2011

Source: NAEP Data Explorer, NCES.

Page 68: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

But clearly we’ve got to move faster, because

performance still trails that in other states.

Page 69: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Source: NAEP Data Explorer, NCES (Proficient Scale Score = 238)

Nevada’s Overall Performance Trails Other States

NV

Page 70: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Source:

Nevada’s Overall Performance Trails Other States

NAEP Data Explorer, NCES (Proficient Scale Score = 299)

NV

Page 71: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

All about demographics?

Page 72: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Nevada Schools: More Diverse Than Many States

Source: Nevada Department of Education

Page 73: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

But, even when you compare “same” group of students,

Nevada’s children are behind.

Page 74: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Source: NAEP Data Explorer, NCES (Proficient Scale Score = 238)

Black Students Below National Average in Nevada

NV

Page 75: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Source: NAEP Data Explorer, NCES (Proficient Scale Score = 238)

Nevada’s White Students Below the National Average

NV

Page 76: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Source: NAEP Data Explorer, NCES (Proficient Scale Score = 238)

In Nevada, Latino Students Below the National Average for Latinos (33rd)

NV

Page 77: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

2003 Grade 4 NAEP ReadingLatino (2nd from bottom)

Source: USDOE, NCES, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP

Page 78: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

And the same patterns exist in 8th grade math.

Page 79: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Source:

Higher Income Students in NevadaTrail Peers Nationwide

NAEP Data Explorer, NCES (Proficient Scale Score = 299)

NV

Page 80: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Source:

Lower Income Students in Nevada Behind Peers in Other States (37th)

NAEP Data Explorer, NCES (Proficient Scale Score = 299)

NV

Page 81: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

2003 Grade 8 NAEP MathLow Income (42nd)

Nor

th D

akot

aM

onta

naSo

uth

Dak

ota

Min

neso

taW

yom

ing

Kans

asVe

rmon

tM

aine

New

Ham

pshi

reId

aho

Ore

gon

Uta

hIo

wa

Indi

ana

Was

hing

ton

Neb

rask

aTe

xas

Ohi

oN

orth

Car

olin

aSo

uth

Car

olin

aM

isso

uri

New

Yor

kC

olor

ado

Virg

inia

Kent

ucky

Mas

sach

uset

tsW

est V

irgin

iaD

elaw

are

Con

nect

icut

Alas

kaO

klah

oma

Wis

cons

inN

atio

nal P

ublic

Ariz

ona

Mic

higa

nPe

nnsy

lvan

iaAr

kans

asIll

inoi

sLo

uisi

ana

Flor

ida

New

Jer

sey

Mar

ylan

dN

evad

aH

awai

iR

hode

Isla

ndG

eorg

iaN

ew M

exic

oC

alifo

rnia

Mis

siss

ippi

Tenn

esse

eAl

abam

aD

istri

ct o

f Col

...

230

235

240

245

250

255

260

265

270

275

280

Source: USDOE, NCES, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP

Page 82: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Summing across?

Page 83: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Source:

Reading: Looking at Performance and Improvement in Nevada

Page 84: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Source:

Math: Looking at Performance and Improvement in Nevada

Page 85: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Post High School?

Page 86: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Source:

Relatively few of Nevada’s graduates go on to college

Postsecondary Education Opportunity, “Chance for College by Age 19 by State, 1986-2008”

Nevada

Page 87: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Source:

When High School Dropout Rate is Factored In, the Picture is Worse

(HS Grad Rate x College Continuation Rate, 2008)

Postsecondary Education Opportunity, “Chance for College by Age 19 by State, 1986--2008”

45.8%

Page 88: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

And of those who enter, few graduate.

Page 89: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Source:

Among those who start in four-year colleges, Nevada has one of the lowest Bachelor’s degree attainment rates

U.S. Department of Education , 2011. United States Education Dashboard. http://dashboard.ed.gov/statedetail.aspx?i=k&id=0&wt=40

First-time, full-time freshmen completing a BA within 6 years

Nevada

Page 90: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Source:

Six-Year College Graduation Rates Hispanic, 2009

U.S. Department of Education , 2011. United States Education Dashboard. http://dashboard.ed.gov/statedetail.aspx?i=k&id=0&wt=40

First-time, full-time freshmen completing a BA within 6 years

62.5%

Page 91: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Source:

Six-Year College Graduation Rates African American, 2009

U.S. Department of Education , 2011. United States Education Dashboard. http://dashboard.ed.gov/statedetail.aspx?i=k&id=0&wt=40

First-time, full-time freshmen completing a BA within 6 years

40%

Page 92: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Source:

Six-Year College Graduation Rates White, 2009

U.S. Department of Education , 2011. United States Education Dashboard. http://dashboard.ed.gov/statedetail.aspx?i=k&id=0&wt=40

First-time, full-time freshmen completing a BA within 6 years

72.9%

Page 93: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Only place Nevada’s performance is strong relative to other states?

Community College Student Success

Page 94: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Source:

Among those in Associate’s programs, Nevada has one of the highest completion rates

U.S. Department of Education , 2011. United States Education Dashboard. http://dashboard.ed.gov/statedetail.aspx?i=l&id=0&wt=40

First-time, full-time freshmen completing an AA or certificate within 3 years

Nevada

Page 95: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Put this all together, and few young adults in Nevada have completed a

postsecondary degree.

Page 96: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Source:

Nevada has one of the lowest rates of young adults with at least an associate’s degree

2009 American Community Survey data from NCHEMS Information Center , http://www.higheredinfo.org/dbrowser/?level=nation&mode=data&state=0&submeasure=239

Nevada

Page 97: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

In sum, Nevada is below average in a country whose

results are increasingly below the international average.

Not a place you want to be.

Page 98: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

What Can You Do?

Page 99: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

First, stop for a moment and celebrate the progress.Don’t forget to say thanks to the educators whose work made this

possible.

Page 100: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Second, don’t accept excuses for why progress can’t

continue—even accelerate—for “these” kids.

Page 101: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

What we hear many say:• They’re poor.• They don’t speak English.• Their parents don’t care.• They come to school without

breakfast.• They don’t have enough books.• They don’t have enough

parents.

Page 102: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

On the college level, we hear much the same thing:

• Our students are unprepared.• They come from a culture of

poverty.• They have to work too many

hours.• Their families don’t value college

education.

Page 103: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

But if there’s truly nothing that we can do, why are low-income students and students of color performing so much higher in

some schools? Some colleges? Even some whole states?

Page 104: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Source:

Mary McLeod Bethune Elementary SchoolNew Orleans, Louisiana

• 341 students in grades PK – 6– 97% African American

• 88% Low Income

Louisiana Department of EducationNote: Enrollment and demographic data are from 2009-2010

Page 105: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Source:

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Big Gains at Bethune Elementary

Louisiana Department of Education

Page 106: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Source:

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Exceeding State Averages at Bethune Elementary

Louisiana Department of Education

Page 107: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Source:

Outperforming the Stateat Bethune Elementary

Source: Louisiana Department of Education

Page 108: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Halle Hewetson Elementary SchoolLas Vegas, NV

• 938 students in grades PK – 5– 87% Latino– 5% African American

• 100% Low Income• 62% Limited English

Proficient

Source: Nevada Department of EducationNote: Data are for 2011-12 school year

Page 109: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Source: Nevada Department of Education

Big Improvementat Halle Hewetson Elementary

Page 110: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Source: Nevada Department of Education

Outperforming the Stateat Halle Hewetson Elementary

Page 111: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Source: Nevada Department of Education

Outperforming the Stateat Halle Hewetson Elementary

Page 112: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Exceeding State Standards at Halle Hewetson Elementary

Source: Nevada Department of Education

Page 113: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Big gains in some districts, too.

Page 114: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

National Public

Los Ange-les

San Diego

Houston

Boston

0 5 10 15 20 25

11

15

15

17

19

Latino Students – NAEP TUDA Grade 8 Math

Change in Mean Scale Score, 2003-2011

Source: NCES, NAEP Data ExplorerNote: Chart includes only districts that participated in, and had members of this specific subgroup, in both the 2003 and 2011 NAEP TUDA administrations .

In Boston and Houston, Latino students made far faster progress between 2003 and 2011 than in the country as a

whole

Page 115: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

National Public

Chicago

Atlanta

Boston

0 5 10 15 20 25

10

15

21

21

African-American Students – NAEP TUDA Grade 8 Math

Change in Mean Scale Score, 2003-2011

Source: NCES, NAEP Data ExplorerNote: Chart includes only districts that participated in, and had members of this specific subgroup, in both the 2003 and 2011 NAEP TUDA administrations .

African-American students in Atlanta and Boston improved at twice the rate of their counterparts nationally

Page 116: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Colleges Can Close Gaps, Too:Virginia Commonwealth University

Six-Year Graduation Rates at VCU (2004-2010)First-time, full-time freshmen who graduated from the same college they started from 6 years ago

Source: Education Trust analysis of IPEDS data.

Page 117: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

You can help by pointing to the successes—here in Nevada and elsewhere--and by pressing for

similar results.

Page 118: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Third, start early, especially with low-income children.

Page 119: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

High quality pre-school is the best investment we can make. It pays to prevent

problems rather than ameliorate them later.

Page 120: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Fourth, get behind the Common Core Standards.

Page 121: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

But adopting the standards and the new tests isn’t

enough.You’ve got to make sure that all

students take the courses in high school that lead to college

readiness.

Page 122: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Moreover, a few more “workshops” on the new

standards won’t do the trick.We need to help teachers remake what they do every day, especially the assignments they give to their

students.

Page 123: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Students can do no better than the assignments we

give them.

Page 124: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Grade 10 Writing AssignmentA frequent theme in literature is the conflict between the individual and society. From literature you have read, select a character who struggled with society. In a well-developed essay, identify the character and explain why this character’s conflict with society is important.

Page 125: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Grade 10 Writing Assignment

Write a composition of at least 4 paragraphs on Martin Luther King’s most important contribution to this society. Illustrate your work with a neat cover page. Neatness counts.

Page 126: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUSTSource: Unnamed school district in California, 2002-03 school year.

Essay on Anne Frank

Your essay will consist of an opening paragraph which introduced the title, author and general background of the novel.

Your thesis will state specifically what Anne's overall personality is, and what general psychological and intellectual changes she exhibits over the course of the book

You might organize your essay by grouping psychological and intellectual changes OR you might choose 3 or 4 characteristics (like friendliness, patience, optimism, self doubt) and show how she changes in this area.

Grade 7 Writing Assignment

Page 127: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

•My Best Friend:

•A chore I hate:

•A car I want:

•My heartthrob:Source: Unnamed school district in California, 2002-03 school year.

Grade 7 Writing Assignment

Page 128: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

High Performing Schools and Districts

• Have clear and specific goals for what students should learn in every grade, including the order in which they should learn it;

• Provide teachers with common curriculum, assignments;

• Have regular vehicle to assure common marking standards;

• Assess students regularly to measure progress; and,

• Don’t leave student supports to chance.

Page 129: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

In other words, they strive for consistency in everything

they do.And they bring that consistency to

school discipline, as well.

Page 130: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Fifth, keep up the work on teacher effectiveness, even

though it is hard.

Page 131: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Students in Dallas Gain More in Math with Effective Teachers: One Year Growth From 3rd-4th Grade

Source: Heather Jordan, Robert Mendro, and Dash Weerasinghe, The Effects of Teachers on Longitudinal Student Achievement, 1997.

Page 132: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

DIFFERENCES IN TEACHER EFFECTIVENESS ACCOUNT FOR LARGE DIFFERENCES IN STUDENT LEARNING

The distribution of value-added scores for ELA teachers in LAUSD

Page 133: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

ACCESS TO MULTIPLE EFFECTIVE TEACHERS CAN DRAMATICALLY AFFECT STUDENT LEARNING

CST math proficiency trends for second-graders at ‘Below Basic’ or ‘Far Below Basic’ in 2007 who subsequently had three consecutive high or low value-added teachers

Page 134: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

So, there are VERY BIG differences among our

teachers.

Page 135: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

BUT…

We pretend that there aren’t.

Page 136: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Source:

Page 137: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Source:

Make sure your state and districts are acting on this knowledge by:

• Putting into place an honest evaluation system, that takes student growth into account;

• Training principals and expert teachers in evaluation and feedback techniques;

• Providing support to teachers who are struggling;

• Working hard to hold onto the strongest ones, and chasing out the weak ones; and,

• Assuring that all groups of children get their fair share of strong teachers.

Page 138: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Sixth, principals matter hugely. States and districts need clear plan to grow new

leaders.

Page 139: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

This is way too important to be left to higher education.

Page 140: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Seventh, higher education needs your attention, too.

Page 141: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Current College Completion Rates:4-Year Colleges

Fewer than 4 in 10 (38%) entering freshmen obtain a bachelor’s degree within 4 years

Within six years of entry, that proportion rises to just under 6 in 10 (58%)

If you go beyond IPEDS, and look at graduation from ANY institution, number grows to about two-thirds.

NCES (March 2012). First Look: Enrollment in Postsecondary Institutions, Fall 2009; Graduation Rates, 2003 and 2006 Cohorts; and Financial Statistics Fiscal Year 2009. Ed Trust analysis of BPS:09.

Page 142: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

But graduation rates vary widely across the nation’s postsecondary institutions

Ed Trust analysis of College Results Online dataset 2010.

Page 143: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Some of these differences are clearly attributable to

differences in student preparation and/or

institutional mission.

n/a

Page 144: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

But…when you dig underneath the averages,

one thing is very clear:

Some colleges are far more successful than their

students’ “stats” would suggest.

Ed Trust analysis of College Results Online dataset 2009.

Page 145: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

College Results Onlinewww.collegeresults.org

College Results Online 2010.

Page 146: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Colleges need to be pressed to work harder to make sure those they admit actually get

the degrees they are seeking.

Page 147: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Finally, mind the gaps in opportunity and achievement.

Page 148: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

True, gaps in achievement begin before children arrive

at the schoolhouse door.But, rather than organizing our

educational system to ameliorate this problem, we organize it to

exacerbate the problem.

Page 149: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

We spend less on their education…

Page 150: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Funding Gaps Within States: National inequities in state and local revenue per student

GapHigh-Poverty versus Low-Poverty Districts

–$773 per student

High-Minority versus Low-Minority Districts

–$1,122 per student

Source: Education Trust analyses of U.S. Department of Education and U.S. Census Bureau data for the 2005-06 school year.

Page 151: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

We expect less of them.....

Page 152: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Source: Prospects (ABT Associates, 1993), in “Prospects: Final Report on Student Outcomes”, PES, DOE, 1997.

Students in poor schools receive As for work that would earn Cs in affluent schools.

87

35

56

34 41

22 21

11

0

100

Per

cent

ile -

CTB

S4

A B C DGrades

Seventh-Grade Math

Low-poverty schools High-poverty schools

Page 153: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

We teach them less…

Page 154: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Source: NCES, “Eighth-Grade Algebra: Findings from the Eighth-Grade Round of the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Kindergarten Class of 1998-99 (ECLS-K)” (2010).

Even African-American students with high math performance in fifth grade are unlikely

to be placed in algebra in eighth grade

Page 155: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Students of color are less likely to attend high schools that offer calculus.

Source: U.S. Department of Education Office for Civil Rights , Civil Rights Data Collection

Percent of Schools Offering Calculus

Page 156: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

And we assign them disproportionately to our least

experienced, least well-educated, and least effective teachers…

Page 157: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Students at high-minority schools more likely to be taught by novice* teachers.

Source: Analysis of 2003-2004 Schools and Staffing Survey data by Richard Ingersoll, University of Pennsylvania 2007.

Note: High minority school: 75% or more of the students are Black, Hispanic, American Indian or Alaskan Native, Asian or Pacific Islander. Low-minority school: 10% or fewer of the students are non-White students. Novice teachers are those with three years or fewer experience.

Page 158: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Math classes at high-poverty, high-minority secondary schools are more likely to be taught by

out-of-field* teachers.

Note: High-poverty school: 55 percent or more of the students are eligible for free/reduced-price lunch. Low-poverty school :15 percent or fewer of the students are eligible for free/reduced-price lunch. High-minority school: 78 percent or more of the students are black, Hispanic, American Indian or Alaskan Native, Asian or Pacific Islander. Low-minority school : 12 percent or fewer of the students are non-white students. *Teachers with neither certification nor major. Data for secondary-level core academic classes (math, science, social studies, English) across the U.S. Source: Education Trust Analysis of 2007-08 Schools and Staffing Survey data.

Page 159: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Tennessee: High-poverty/high-minority schools have fewer of the “most effective” teachers and

more “least effective” teachers.

17.6%

21.3%23.8%

16%

0

5

10

15

20

25

High-poverty/high-minority schools

Low-poverty/low-minority schools

Perc

ent o

f Tea

cher

s

Most Effective Teachers

Least Effective Teachers

Source: Tennessee Department of Education 2007. “Tennessee’s Most Effective Teachers: Are they assigned to the schools that need them most?” http://tennessee.gov/education/nclb/doc/TeacherEffectiveness2007_03.pdf.

Note: High poverty/high minority means at least 75 percent of students qualify for FRPL and at least 75 percent are minority.

Page 160: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Los Angeles: Black, Latino students have fewer highly effective teachers, more weak

ones. Latino and black students are:

3X as likely to get low- effectiveness teachers

½ as likely to get highly effective teachers

READING/LANGUAGE ARTS

Source: Education Trust—West, Learning Denied, 2012.

Page 161: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

The results are devastating.

Kids who come in a little behind, leave a lot behind.

Page 162: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Those practices aren’t good for kids. And they are not

good for our country.

Page 163: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

We are taking the diversity that should be our

competitive advantage in the international marketplace,

and obliterating it.Don’t just stand by and watch,

even if they are not “your” kids. Speak up. Demand the data.

Demand progress.

Page 164: Education Policy Committee

© 2013 THE EDUCATION TRUST

Washington, D.C. Royal Oak, MI 202/293-1217 734/619-8009

Oakland, CA510/465-6444

Download this presentation and learn more about the Education Trust. www.edtrust.org


Recommended