Education sysytem india

EDUCATION SYSTEM IN INDIA

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

PRESENTATION BY :-

Prateek Kataria Avika Sood Sanjay Agarwal Prabhleen Lamba

INTRODUCTION

Indian Department of Education : Ministry Of Human Resource Development

Headed By: Kapil Sibbal

National Budget: 52,057 crore

System Type: Federal ,State , Private

Literacy

Total Male Female

71% 82% 65%

Source: IDFC-SSKI Research

PRESENT SCENARIO

National Council For Education Research and Training is the apex body for Curriculum

NCERT provides research and Training and Research assistance to various Schools.

Other Bodieso ICSE (Indian School Certification Examination)o State Boardso National Institute Of Open Schooling


STRUCTURE


ISSUES Work Force Quality

o 25% of public sector teachers and 40% of public sector medical workers were absent

o Absence rates ranged from 15% in Maharashtra to 30% in Bihar

Infrastructureo 59% of the schools had no drinking water and 89% had no toiletso 3.5% of primary schools in Bihar and Chhattisgarh had toilets for girlso The number of secondary schools is almost half the number of upper

primary schools available in the country

Curriculum Issueso Rote learning rather than problem solving

Participationo Lower secondary level enrolment rate is 52%o Senior secondary level it is 28%o Pre-school is merely 18%o 48% drop-out rate in elementary education Source: Fortress Team Research

GRIM REALITYA NEED FOR CHANGE

IES - the largest Inefficiency - the highest Investablity quotient(IQ)- the lowest

Largest Capitalized space • Public spend of $30bn (3.7% of GDP) • Private spend of $50bn (14% CAGR)

Largest Supply• A network of ~1m schools and 18,000 HEIs• First Indian satellite - EDUSAT (launch Sep-04) to serve the education sectorLargest Demand • Globally the largest population of 572m within the 0-24 years age group

‘Insufficient’ funds • Free product loses market share - 40% of the student base enrolled in private schools

‘Inefficient’ supply• 66% of the school network only till primary level• Only 0.85% of USD 30 bn spent on capital expenditure

Lowest enrollments, highest dropouts• 61% of target population enrolled• 40% dropout

$40bn:‘overregulated & under- governed’ • For 80% of the private spends (formal IES), regulations (not-for-profit mandate) a big deterrent • Low political will to bring about the much required structural change

$10bn: Scores low on scalability. For remaining 20% (non-formal IES), scalability remains a big issue


COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

( 2009)

COMPARISON OF REGULATIONSSegment India US UK Brazil Singapore

Pre-School Profit motive allowed

Profit motive allowed

No regulations

Low regulations

Low regulations

K-12 Non profit motive


Profit making not allowed

No government interference in fees

Profit making allowed

Tutoring Profit motive allowed

- - - -

Higher Education

Non profit motive



No government interference in fees


Vocational Profit motive allowed


Not controlled

Not controlled

Special policies to encourage growth

Preparatory Profit motive allowed

- - - -

Source: Technopak Advisors Report

KEY PLAYERS IN PRIVATE SECTOR

Preschool

Multimedia/ IT in Schools

Coaching Classes

Vocational Training

Book Market

Source: Company, IDFC-SSKI Research

DEEPER DIVE INTO PRIVATE IES

7% of these schools are private - yet 40% of the students are enrolled Private

India has 18,000 higher education institutes - 77% of them are private

93% Government

7%Private

40% Private

60% Government

77% Private

23%Government

Total no. of students enrolled 219m

Total no. of Higher Education Instututes18,000

Total no. of schools 1,025,000

US$ 50 Bn expected to grow to US$ 80 Bn by 2012 (14% CAGR)


STRUCTURAL CHANGES REQUIRED

AgAgenda

What is the Issue? What Needs to Change?

• Regulations require all institutions to be run as a trust or society• No dividends & surplus to be ploughed back

• A structural change required to allow for-profit schools & colleges.

• More than 75% of educational institutes run by politicians

• Strong political will to realign education policies• Vested interest needs to take a back seat

• Subsidized land demarked for schools is hoarded & resold to schools at much higher prices

• State development authorities need to put a system in place to ensure genuine bidders get land

• Despite 100% FDI, no regulation formulated for recognizing foreign HEIs under UGC

• Clear regulations need to be in place to recognize foreign universities

‘Trust’ Issues

Political Quagmire

Low FDI

Land Blues


DEEPER DIVE INTO PRIVATE IES

IIM A IIM B IIM C IIM K0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

0.2 0.2 0.15 0.15

1.15

0.9

0.6 0.6

1999 2008

Fees

per

ann

um (R

s. m

)

Private Schools Coaching Classes0

50001000015000200002500030000350004000045000

15000

3500

40000

16000

1999 2008

Fees

per

ann

um (R

s.)

CAGR 12%

CAGR 18%

Household spend on education - CAGR of 8.6% versus consumption growth of 3.2% over 1995 - 2005


Growth Scalabliby Value creation

Non- regulated Comments

Pre-school Kids and Kangaroo Kids are the relevant players

K-12Innovative structures evolving; Educomp Solutions

Higher Education

Innovative structures evolving; a long term game; Manipal Universal Learning the only investable player

Vocational Training and

coachingNIIT the only scaled-up model;80% of the market difficult to scale

BooksLow-growth market (reusability at 70%Low-growth market (reusability at 70%

Multimedia in Schools

Annuity business model; Educomp Solutions


KEY TRENDS & WAY FORWARDInternationalization Establishing international collaborations for faculty/student exchange Offshore campuses - Monash University, Leeds University

Changes in Policy Landscape Changes expected in matters of transparency & norms Stress on quality above quantity

Increase in the Need for Professional Talent Scarcity of availability of faculty Increase in difficulty in filling jobs - 67% in 2011

Adoption of Technology Increasing need for streamlining & controlling processes Multimedia in school is expected to grow to $320 mn in 2013


Growth of Multi-Campus Model Colleges opening other campuses

Online Education Due to an great increase in the number of internet users Expected to grow to $220 mn in 2013 from $40 mn in 2008

Sports Education $38 bn sports education and management industry Entities like Edu Sports, Kooh Sports, Sports Education Development

Vocational Education/ Training Enhance workforce from current 12% to 25% by 2017 Government intends to open 250,000 schools in next 5 years

KEY TRENDS


SWOT ANALYSIS

STRENG

THS

Responsible for creation of large human resources

Skill set with English proficiency and quantitative has resulted in international demand of Indian students

Presence of Government run initiatives and NGO’S have provided a strong base to the system

New education reforms has made education sector more lucrative

According to world bank, 3.6 million teachers working on full time basis


WEAKN

ESS Lack of investment in infrastructure leading to mis –

administered universities

Heavy dependence on government funding

Political interference in the university administration

Lack of market orientation in designing curriculum

Inadequate collaboration among professional organizations

Little scope in extra curricular activities


OPPO

RTUN

ITIES Inflow of foreign students resulting in huge revenues

Increased competition resulting in improved efficiency and quality

FDI in education helping the Indian students to get education at cheaper costs

More than 300 equity funds likely to invest in indian education system

44.4% increase in American students (2,690 in 2010 to 3,884 in 2011)


THREATS

Private institutions may not indulge in social responsibility

Regional disparities between rich and poor may widen

Marketing techniques by universities may promote courses which are irrelevant to students

High growth in foreign and Indian colleges might focus on profit making rather than quality education


THANK

YOU

Date post:	30-Jan-2015
Category:	Education
Upload:	sanjay231116
View:	1,436 times
Download:	0 times