161
REFERENCES
ACS Chemistry Major. (2011). Five-Year Departmental Assessment Plan for
Undergraduate Programs in Chemistry. Department of Chemistry California
State University, Bakersfield. [email protected].
Aiken, L. R. (1996). Tests Psicológicosy Evaluación, México. Prentice Hall.
Akturk, A. O., & Sahin, I. (2011). Literature Review on Metacognition and its
Measurement. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences.
www.sciencedirect.com. 3731–3736
Alberta. (2003). Classroom assessment tool kit for the Information and
Communication Technology (ICT). Program of studies: grades 1–6. www.
learning. gov. ab. ca/k-12/ curriculum.
Alexander, P. A.‚ & Winne, P. H. (2006). Handbook of Educational Psychology
(2nd ed.). New Jersey: Lawrence Earlbaum.
Allen, R. (1996). Performance Assessment. Wisconsin Education Association
Council. Retrieved from http://www.weac.org/resource/may96/perform.htm.
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, &
National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for
Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington, DC: American
Educational Research Association.
Andrade, H.‚ & Du, Y. (2005). Student perspectives on rubric-referenced assessment.
Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, University at Albany, 10(3),
1531-7714.
Ashwin, P. (2008). Accounting for structure and agency in close up research on
teaching, learning and assessment in higher education. International Journal
of Education Research, 47, 151-158.
Attar Khamene, F.‚ & Seif, A. (2011). Effect of teaching meta-cognition approaches
of reading on the motivation and educational progress of students. Journal of
Educational Psychology studies. 5(12)‚ 2228-6683.
Au, K. H., & Jordan, C. (1981). Teaching reading to Hawaiian children: Finding a
culturally appropriate solution. In H. Trueba, G. P. Guthrie, & K. H. Au
162
(Eds.), Culture in the bilingual classroom: Studies in classroom ethnography
(pp. 139-152). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Azer, S. (2009). Problem-based learning in the Fifth, sixth and seventh grades:
Assessment of students' perceptions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25,
1033-1042.
Bachman, L. F. (2002). Some reflections on task-based language performance
assessment. Language Testing, 19, 453-476.
Bagnato, S. (2007). Authentic Assessment for early childhood intervention: Best
practices. New York: The Guilford Press.
Bailery, M.‚ & Tuohy, D. (2009). Student horses experiences of experiences of using
a learning content as a method of assessment. Nurse Education. 29, 758-762.
Baker, E. L.‚ & O'neil, H. F. (1994) Performance assessment and equity: a view from
the USA, Assessment in Education, 1, 11-26.
Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development andfunctioning.
Educ. Psychol. 28: 117-148.
Bedir, A., Polat, M.‚ & Sakacı, T. (2009). 7.sınıf fen ve teknoloji dersine ait bir
uygulama çalışması: Portfolyo [Performance application of the 7th grade
science and technology course: Portfolio]. C.B.Ü. Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 5 (1),
45-58.
Bennett, R. E.‚ & Gitomer, D. H. (2008). Transforming K-12 Assessment: Integrating
Accountability Testing, Formative Assessment and Professional Support. In C.
Wyatt-Smith & J. Cumming (Eds.), Educational assessment in the21st
century. New York: Springer.
Berk, R. A. (Ed.). (1986). Performance assessment. Baltimore, MD: jons Hopkins
University press.
Birgin, O. (2008). Alternatif bir değerlendirme yöntemi olarak portfolyo
değerlendirme uygulamasına ilişkin öğrenci görüşleri [Students‘ views on
portfolio application as an alternative assessment method]. Türk Eğitim
Bilimleri Dergisi, 6(1), 1-24.
163
Black, P., Wiliam, D., Lee, C. & Harrison, C. (2004). Teachers developing
assessment for learning: impact on student achievement. Assessment in
Education, 11(1), 49-65.
Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B. & Wiliam, D. (2003). Assessment for
learning: Putting it into practice. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Black, P., & William, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through
classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80, 139-148.
Bloxham, S., & Boyd, P. (2007). Developing Effective Assessment in Higher
Education: a practical guide. Berkshire: Open University Press McGraw-Hill
Education.
Bonk, W. J.‚ & Ockey, G. J. (2003). A Many-facet Rasch analysis of the second
language group oral discussion task. Language Testing, 20(1), 89-110.
Boud, D. (2010). Assessment 2020: Seven propositions for assessment reform in
higher education. Sydney: Australian Learning and Teaching Council.
Boud, D. (1990). Assessment and the promotion of academic Studies in Higher
Education, 15(1).
Brandt, R. (1998). Foreword. In G. Wiggins and J. McTighe, Understanding by
Design (pp. v-vi). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and
Curriculum Development.
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain,
mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Brennan, R., & Johnson, E. (1995). Generalizability of performance assessments.
Educational Measurement: Issues and Practices, 14(4), 9–12, 27.
Brown, A. (2005). Self-Assessment of writing in independent language learning
programs: The value of annotated samples. Assessment Writing. 174- 191.
Brown, G. T. L. (2003). Teachers‘ instructional conceptions: assessment's relationship
to learning, teaching, curriculum, and teacher efficacy. Paper presented to the
Joint Conference of the Australian and New Zealand Associations for
Research in Education (AARE/NZARE), Auckland, NZ, November 28 to
164
December 3, 2003. Retrieved 25 August, 2009 from
www.aare.edu.au/03pap/bro03022.pdf.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A.‚ & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated Cognition and the Culture of
Learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-41.
Brown‚ AL (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more
mysterious mechanisms. In: Weinert F, Kluwe R (eds) Metacognition,
motivation, and understanding, Erlbaum: Hillsdate NJ, 65-116.
Brown, AL., Branford, JD., Ferrara, RA., & Champione, JC. (1983). Learning,
remembering, and understanding. In: Flavell JH, Markman EM (eds)
Handbook of child psychology. 3, 77-166.
Brualdi, A. (1998). Implementing Performance Assessment in the Classroom.
Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 6(2). Retrieved August 7, 2008,
from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=6&n=2.
Buoncristiani, P., & Buoncristiani, M.(2008). Deconstructing Metacognition,
Thinking and Learning in Concert.6 http://ThinkingAndLearning
InConcert.org.
Business Higher Education Forum. (2007). Spanning the chasm: Corporate and
academic cooperation to improve work-force preparation. Retrieved on
January 21, 2008, from http://www.bhef.com/publications/spanning the chasm
task force on high performance work and workers the academic
connection.pdf.
Butler, S. M.‚ & McMunn, N. D. (2006). Understanding and using assessment to
improve student learning. CA: Jossey- Bass.
Calfee, R.‚ & Perfumo, P. (1993). Student portfolios: Opportunities for a revolution in
assessment. Journal of Reading, 36(7), 532-537.
California State Board of Education. (1990). Science frameworks for California
public schools, kindergarten to grade twelve. Sacramento, CA: California
State Board of Education.
165
Calma, A. (2010). Teaching and Learning Unit: Staff Development Guides for
academics in the Faculty of Business and Economics: Authentic Assessment.
http://tlu.fbe.unimelb.edu.au.
Case, J., Gunstone, R., & Lewis, A. (2001). Students' metacognitive development in
an innovative second year chemical engineering course. Research in Science
Education, 31, 313-335.
Chalmers, C. (2009). Developing Primary Students‘ Group Metacognitive Processes
in a Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Environment. Ph.D. thesis.
The university of Queensland. http://eprints.qut.edu.au/29819/1.
Chari, H., Samavi, A., & Kordestani, D. (2010). Analyzing and comparison on
psychological aspects of questionnaire of strategies of metacognition of
reading in high school students. Journal of Psychological Studies. 3386-1735.
Chaung, Y. Y. (2009). A Study of Performance-based Assessment for Taiwanese
College EFL Students. Englishes and Literatures-in-English in a Globalised
World: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on English in
Southeast Asia (pp. 191-204). Singapore: National Institute of Education,
Nanyang Technological University. www.cuhk.edu.hk/rao/research.
Chaung, Y. Y. (2009). A Study of Performance-based Assessment for Taiwanese
College EFL Students. Englishes and Literatures-in-English in a Globalised
World: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on English in
Southeast Asia (pp. 191-204). Singapore: National Institute of Education,
Nanyang Technological University. www.cuhk.edu.hk/rao/research
Chen D, Singer, R. (1992). Self-regulation and cognitive strategies in sport
participation. Int. J. Sport Psychol. 23‚ 277-300.
Child, D. (1973/2004): Psychology and the Teacher, London/New York, Continuum,
359-389.
Chisholm, J. M. (1999). The Effects of Metacognition, Criticai Thinking, Gender, and
Gender Role Identification on Academic Achievement in the Middle Years.
Ph.D. thesis. University of Mount Saint Vincent at Halifax, Nova Scotia.
prr.hec.gov.pk/Chapters/726S-B.pdf.
166
Choi, J. Y. (2006). "Metacognitive Evaluation Method in Consecutive Interpretation
for Novice Learners". Translators' Journal. V(2)‚273-283.
http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/013256ar.
Chuang, Y. Y. (2007). A study of college English teachers‗ preferences and
perceptions of using the types of tasks for assessing Taiwanese EFL students‗
foreign language oral proficiency. Journal of Applied Foreign Languages, 8,
40-77.
Cizek, G. J. (1993). Reconsidering standards and criteria. Journal of Educational
measurement, 30, 93-106.
Clarke, David J. (1992). Activating assessment alternatives in mathematics.
Arithmetic Teacher, 59(6), 24-29.
Cohen, L., & Manion, L.(2000). Research methods in education(5td Ed). London:
Routledge.
Cooper, B., & Cowie, B. (2010). Collaborative research for assessment for learning.
Teaching and Teacher education, 26, 979-986.
Cooper, M. M., Sandi-Urena, S., & Stevens, R. (2008). Reliable multi method
assessment of metacognition use in chemistry problem solving. Chemistry
Education Research and Practice. DOI: 10.1039/b801287n.
Cooper, S. S. (2004). Metacognition in the adult leaner. Unpublished master's thesis,
Weber State University, Ogden, UT. Retrieved May 31, 2007, from http:www.
lifecircles-inc.com/metacognition.htm.
Costa, A. L.‚ & Kallick, B. (2007). ―Habits of Mind‖, in preparation.
www.d.umn.edu/~dglisczi/4501web/.../A1HabitsofMind.doc.
Coutinho, S. A. (2007). The relationship between goals, metacognition, and academic
success. Educate Journal. 7(1), 39-47.
Cremin, L. (1961). The transformation of the school: Progressivism in American
education, 1876-1957. New York: Vintage Books.
Crews‚ D.J. (1993). Self-regulation strategies in sport and exercise. In: Singer RN,
Murphey M, Tennant LK (eds) Handbook of research on sport psychology,
Macmillan: New York, 557-568.
167
Cross, D. R.‚ & Paris, S. G. (1988). Developmental and instructional analyses of
children‘s metacognition and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational
Psychology, 80(2), 131-142.
Cubukcu, F. (2008). Enhancing vocabulary development and reading comprehension
through metacognitive strategies. Educational Research, 18(1).
Cunliffe, L. (2005). The problematic relationship between knowing how and knowing
that in secondary art education. Oxford Review of Education, 31(4), 547-556.
Darling-Hammond, L., Barron, B., Cervetti, G., Pearson, P. D., Schoenfeld, A. H.,
Stage, E. K. (2008). Powerful learning: What we know about teaching for
understanding. San Francisco; Jossey-Bass.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Snyder, J. (2000). Authentic assessment of teaching in
context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 23.
Davidowitz, B., & Rollnick, M. (2003). Enabling metacognition in the laboratory: A
case study of four second year university chemistry students. Research in
Science Education, 33, 43-69.
Davis, K. (2003). Multiple analysis of variance (MANOVA) or multiple analysis of
covariance (MANCOVA). Louisiana State University.
Dawson, T. L. (2008). Metacognition and learning in adulthood. Developmental
Testing Service, LLC. http:devtestservice.com.
Dearnley, C.‚ & Matthew, B. (2007). Factors that contribute to undergraduate student
success. Teaching in Higher Education, 12, 377-391.
Dembo, M. H. (1994). Applying educational psychology (5th
ed). New York: Long-
man.
Doane, W. E. J., Rice, R., & Zachos, P. A. (2006). Knowing when you don‘t know.
The Science Teacher 73(4): 46–49.
Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Sluijsmans, D. (1999). The Use of Self-, Peer and Co-
assessment in Higher Education: a review. Studies in Higher Education, 24(3),
331-350.
168
Doris, B. (1993). Authentic performance assessment. Childhood Education. Available
on free library.
Downing, S. (2006). Twelve steps for effective test development. In S. Downing& T.
Haladyna (Eds.), Handbook of test development (pp. 3–25). Mahwah, NJ:
Erlbaum.
Dunning, D., Johnson, K., Ehrlinger, J., & Kruger, J. (2003) Why people fail to
recognize their own incompetence. Current Directions in Psychological
Science 12, 3, 83-87.
Efklides, A. (2001). Metacognitive experiences in problem solving: metacognition,
motivation, and self-regulation. In: Efklides A, Kuhl J, Sorrentino RM (eds)
Trends and prospects in motivation research, Kluwer: Dordrecht The
Netherlands, 297-323.
Elwood, J. (2006). Views of assessment, learning and mind: exploring the links and
the implications for emerging trends and perspectives in assessment.
International Association for Educational Assessment, Singapore.
www.iaea.info/documents/paper_1162a20d9b.pdf.
Engqvist, L. (2005). The mistreatment of covariate interaction terms in linear model
analyses of behavioural and evolutionary ecology studies. Animal Behaviour,
70, 967–971.
Erdogan, T., & Yurdabaka, I. (2011). SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS‘
OPINIONS ON PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT IN EFL. 2nd International
Conference on New Trends in Education and Their Implications 27-29 April,
2011 Antalya-Turkey www.iconte.org.
Erskine, D. L. (2009). Effect of Prompted Reflection and Metacognitive Skill
Instruction on University Freshmen‘s use of Metacognition. Ph.D. thesis.
Brigham Young University, http://udini.proquest.com.
Ferrari, M., Pinard, A., Reid, L., & Bouffard-Bouchard, T. (1991). The relationship
between expertise and self-regulation in movement performance: some
theoretical issues. Percept. Mot. Skills 72‚ 139-150.
169
Feuer, M., & Fulton, K. (1993). The many faces of performance assessment. Phi
Delta Kappan, 74(6), 478.
Fitzpatrick, R., & Morrison, E. (1971). Performance and product evaluation. In R.
Thorndike (Ed.), Educational measurement (pp. 237–270). Washington, DC:
American Council of Education.
Flavell, J. H. (1987). Speculations about the nature and development of
metacognition. In: Weinert F, Kluwe R (eds) Metacognition, motivation, and
understanding, Erlbaum: Hillsdale NJ, 21-29.
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of
cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906-911.
Ford, K. J., Smith, E. M., Weissbein, D. A., Gully, S. M., & Salas, E. (1998).
Relationships of goal orientation, metacognitive activity, and practice
strategies with learning outcomes and transfer. J. Appl. Psychol. 83‚ 218-233.
Fortune, J., & Cromack, T. (1995). Developing and using clinical examination. In J.
Impara (Ed.), Licensure testing: Purposes, procedures, and practices (pp.
149–165). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurement.
Fox, R. (2001). Constructivism examined. Oxf. Rev. Educ. 27‚24-35.
Francisco, J. S., & Nicoll, G. (1998). Integrating multiple teaching methods into a
general chemistry classroom. Journal of Chemical Education, 75(2), 210-213.
Frederiksen, J. R.‚ & Collins, A. (1989). A systems approach to educational testing.
Educational Researcher, 18(9), 27-32.
Frederiksen, J. R., & White, B. Y. (1997). Reflective assessment of students‘ research
within an inquiry-based middle school science curriculum. Paper presented at
the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association,
Chicago.
French, A.‚ Macedo, M.‚ Poulsen, J.‚ Waterson, T.‚ & Yu, A. (2010). Multivariate
analysis of variance (MANOVA).
http://userwww.sfsu.edu/~efc/classes /biol710/manova/MANOVAnewest.pdf.
170
Frisby, C. L. (2001) Academic achievement. In L. A. Suzuki, J. G. Ponterotto, & P. J.
Meller(Eds.), Handbook of multicultural assessment(2nd ed., pp. 541-568).
San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.
Gardner, H. (1993). Frames of mind. 4th ed. New York: Basic Books.
Garner‚ R., & Alexander‚ P. (1989). Metacognition: answered and unanswered
questions. Educ. Psychol. 24‚143-158.
Georghiades‚ P. (2000). Beyond conceptual change learning in science education:
focusing on transfer, durability and metacognition, Educ. Res., 42, 119-139.
Gewertz, C. (2008). States Press Ahead on ‗21st-Century Skills.‘ Education Week,
28(8), 21-23.
Ghiasvand, M. Y. (2010). Relationship between learning strategies and academic
achievement; based on information processing approach. Procedia Social and
Behavioral Sciences. 5 (2010) 1033–1036. www.sciencedirect.com.
Goldin, G. (1992). Towards an assessment framework for school mathematics. In R.
Lesh & S. Lamon (Eds.), Assessment of authentic performance in school
mathematics (pp. 63-88). Washington, DC: American Association for the
Advancement of Science.
Gomez, E. (2000). Assessment portfolios: Including English language learners in
large-scale assessments. ERIC Digest based on article published by the
Northeast and Islands Regional Educational Laboratory at Brown University
in "Perspectives on Policy and Practice" (March 1999). (ERIC Document
Reproduction Service No. ED447725).
Gong, B., & Reidy, E. (1996). Assessment and accountability in Kentucky‘s school
reform. In J. Baron & D. Wolf (Eds.), Performance-based student assessment:
Challenges and possibilities (pp. 215–233). Chicago: National Society for the
Study of Education.
Gonzales, P., Guzmلn, J., Partelow, L., Pahlke, E., Jocelyn, L., & Kastberg, D.
(2004). Highlights from the trends in international mathematics and science
study (TIMSS) 2003 (NCES 2005–005). Washington, DC: U.S. Government
Printing Office.
171
Gott, S. P., Lesgold, A., & Kane, R. S. (1996). Tutoring for transfer of technical
competence. In B. G. Wilson (Ed.), Constructivist Learning Environments:
Case Studies in Instructional Design (pp. 33-48). New Jersey: Educational
Technology Publications.
Graff, G. (2009). Why Assessment? Pedagogy: Critical Approaches to Teaching
Literature, Language, Composition, and Culture, 10(1), 153-165.
Green, S. B., & Salkind, N. J. (2011). Using SPSS for Windows and Macintosh:
Analyzing and Understanding Data (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ:
Prentice Hall.
Gregory, T., David, A., & Samson, N. (2008). Development of annstrument Designed
to Investigate Elements of Science Students‘ Metacognition, Self-Efficacy and
Learning Processes: The SEMLI-S I. International Journal of Science
Education‚30(13),1701–1724.
Gronlund, N. (2006). Assessment of student achievement (8th ed.). Boston: Allyn &
Bacon.Jakwerth, P. (1999). TIMMS performance assessment results: United
States. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 25, 277–281.
Gulikers, J. T. M., Bastiaens, T. J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2004). Perceptions of
Authentic Assessment: Five Dimensions of Authenticity. Paper presented at the
Second Biannual Joint Northumbria/European Association for Research on
Learning and Instruction SIG Assessment Conference, Bergen, Norway.
Retrieved December 7, 2008, from http://www.ou.nl/Doc/Expertise/OTEC.
Gullickson, A. K. (2003). The student evaluation standards. Thousand Ouks, CA:
corwin.
Haefner, T. (2004). Assessment as a magnification of internal, parallel, and external
reflection. Action in Teacher Education, 25(4), 14-19.
Haladyna, T. M., Nolen, S. B., & Haas, N. S. (1991). Raising Standardized
Achievement Test Scores and the Origins of Test Score Pollution. Educational
Researcher, 20(5), 2-7.
172
Hale, M. (1982). History of employment testing. In A. Wigdor & W. Garner(Eds.),
Ability testing: Uses, consequences, and controversies. Part II:
Documentation section (pp. 3–38). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Haller, E., Child, D., & Walberg, H. (1988). Can comprehension be taught? Educ.
Res. 7: 5-8.
Hamayan, E. V., & Damico, J. S. (1991). Limiting bias in the assessment of bilingual
students. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
Hamilton, L. S. (1994). Validating hands-on science assessments through an
investigation of response process. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of
the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA. (ERIC
Document Reproduction Service No. ED376202).
Hart, D. (1994). Authentic assessment. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.
Hartman, H. J. (2001). Developing students' metacognitive knowledge and skills. In
H. J. Hartman (Ed.), Metacognition in Learning and Instruction: Theory,
Research and Practice (pp. 33 - 63). Boston: Kluwer.
Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life, and work in communities and
classrooms. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Herman, J. L., Klein, D., Heath, T.M., & Wakai, S. T. (1994). A first look: Are claims
for alternative assessment holding up? (CSE Tech. Rep. No. 391). Los Angles:
University of California, Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and
student Testing.
Herman, J. L., Aschbacher, P. R., & Winters, L. (1992). A Practical Guide to
Alternative Assessment. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and
Curriculum Development‚ 2.
Herrington, J., & Herrington, A. (1998). Authentic Assessment and Multimedia: How
University Students Respond to a Model of Authentic Assessment [Electronic
version]. Higher Education Research and Development, 17(3), 305-322.
Retrieved November 6, 2008, from http://adserver2.uow.edu.au
Hoffmann, D. J. (2000). Metacognition and multiplicity: The arts as models and
agents. Educational Psychology Review, 12, 339-359.
173
Hollingworth, R. W., & McLoughlin, C. M. (2000). Developing First Year Science
Students‘ Problem Solving Skills: Can We Do it Online? Online Learning
Environment. www.ascilite.org.au results
Howell, D. C. (2009) Statistical methods for psychology (7th ed.). Belmont: Cengage
Wadsworth.
Jacobs, G. M. (2004). A Classroom Investigation of the Growth of Metacognitive
Awareness in Kindergarten Children through the Writing Process. Early
Childhood Education Journal, 32(1).
James, R., McInnis, C., Devlin, M. (2002). Assessing Learning in Australian
Universities. Centre for the Study of Higher Education, The University of
Melbourne. www.cshe.unimelb.edu.au/assessinglearning
Javadi, M., Keyvanara, M., Yaghobi, M., Hassanzadeh, A., & Ebadi, Z. (2010). The
Relationship between Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies and
Students‘ Academic Status in Isfahan University of Medical Sciences.Iranian
Journal of Education in health science‚ 3(10). 246- 254.
Johanson, G., & Motlomelo, S. (1998). An item format continuum for classroom
assessment. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American
Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
Joughin, G. (2010). The hidden curriculum revisited: a critical review of research into
the influence of summative assessment on learning. Assessment & Evaluation
in Higher Education, 35(3), 335–345.
Kabba, C. (2008). Tips and Techniques for Creative Teaching. Goddard College in
Plainfield, Vermont, 1.
Kahl, S. (2008). The Assessment of 21st Century Skills: Something Old, Something
New, Something Borrowed. Paper presented at the Council of Chief State
School Officers 38th National Conference on Student Assessment, Orlando,
FL.
Kearney, S. P.‚ & Perkins‚ T. (2011). Developing Students' Capacity for Innovation,
Creativity and Critical Thinking through Contemporary forms of Assessment.
174
Proceedings of the 9th Annual Hawaii International Conference on Education
2011. CD ROM (ISSN# 1541 - 5880,p.75).http://www.hiceducation.org.
Kearney, S. P.‚ & Perkins‚ T. (2010). Developing students‘ capacity for innovation,
creativity and critical thinking through contemporary forms of assessment: a
case study in progress. Paper presented at ATN Assessment Conference,
University of Technology, Sydney.
Keppel, G. (1991). Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook (3rd ed.).
Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Khabiri, P. (1993). The role of metacognition, effort and worry in math problem
solving requiring problem translation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation,
University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Khattri, N., Reeve, A., & Kane, M. (1998). Principles and practices of performance
assessment. Manwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.Knapp, J., &
Knapp, L. (1995). Practice analysis: Building the foundation for validity. In J.
Impara (Ed.), Licensure testing: Purposes, procedures, and practices (pp. 93–
116). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurement.
Khoramde, K.‚ Sajadian, P., Bahrami, F., & Zangene, S. (2012). Validation of the
Meta-cognitions Questionnaire—Adolescent Version (MCQ-A) in an Iranian
sample and compare of met cognitive beliefs between adolescents with anxiety
disorders and normal sample. Zahedan Journal of Research in Medical
science.7977-53.
Klassen, S. (2006). Contextual assessment in science education: Background, issues
and policy. Science Education, 90(5), 820–851.
Klein, S. P., Jovanovic, J., Stecher, B. M., McCaffrey, D., Shavelson, R. J., Haertel,
E., Solano-Flores, G., & Comfort, K. (1997). Gender and racial/ethnic
differences on performance assessments in science. Educational Evaluation
and Policy Analysis, 19(2), 83-97.
Kolls, M. (1992). Portfolio assessment: A feasibility study. Paper presented at the
annual meeting of Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages,
Vancouver, B.C., Canada.
175
Koretz, D., Stecher, B., Klein, S., & McCaffrey, D. (1994). The Vermont portfolio
assessment program: Findings and implications. Educational Measurement:
Issues and Practice, 13(3), 5–16.
Korn, E. L., & Graubard, B. I. (2000). Analysis of Health Surveys, Wiley‚1.
Kosmicki, J. (1993). The effect of differential test instructions on math achievement,
effort, and worry of community college students. Unpublished doctoral
dissertation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Kuhn, D.‚ & Dean, D. (2004). A bridge between cognitive psychology and
educational practice. Theory into Practice, 43(4), 268-273.
Kuhn, D. (2000). Metacognitive development. Current Directions in Psychological
Science, 9(5), 178-181.
Kulieke, M., Bakker, J., Collins, C., Fennimore, T., Fine, C., Herman, J., Jones, B. F.,
Raack, L., & Tinzmann, M.B. (1990). Why should assessment be based on a
vision of learning? [online document] NCREL, Oak Brook: IL. Available
online: http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/rpl_esys/assess.htm.
Lai, E. R. (2011). Metacognition: A Literature Review. Research Report.
http://www.pearsonassessments.com/research.
Lampert, M. (2001). Teaching problems and the problems of teaching. New Haven,
CT: Yale University Press.
Lamprianou, I., & Athanasou, J., A. (2009). A Teacher‘s Guide to Educational
Assessment. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Lane, S. (2010). Performance assessment: The state of the art. (SCOPE Student
Performance Assessment Series). Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Stanford
Center for Opportunity Policy in Education.
Lane, S., & Stone, C. (2006). Performance assessment. In R. Brennan (Ed.),
Educational measurement (4th ed., pp. 387–431). Westport, CT: American
Council on Education and Praeger.
176
Lane, S., Parke, C. S., & Stone, C. A. (2002). The Impact of a State Performance-
Based Assessment and Accountability Program on Mathematics Instruction
and Student Learning: Evidence from Survey Data and School Performance.
Educational Assessment, 8(4), 279-315.
Leader, W. S. (2008). Metacognition among Students Identified as Gifted or
Nongifted Using the Discover Assessment. Unpublished Doctoral
Dissertation. Tucson, AZ: Graduate College of the University of Arizona.
Leamnson, R. (1999). Thinking about teaching and learning: Developing habits of
learning with first year college and university students. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
Lefranciois, G. R. (2000).Psychology for teaching (10th
ed.). Wadsworth.
LeMahieu, P., Gitomer, D., & Eresh, J. (1995). Portfolios in large-scale assessment:
Difficult but not impossible. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice,
14(3), 11–16, 25–28.
Lingtan, A.‚ & Towndrow, P. (2009). Catalyzing student- teacher interactions and
teacher learning in science practical formative assessment with digital video
technology. Teaching and Teacher Edycation‚ 25, 61-65.
Linn, R. L. (1993). Educational assessment: Expanded expectations and challenges.
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15, 1-16.
Liskin-Gasparro, J. (1997). Comparing Traditional and Performance-Based
Assessment. Paper presented at the Symposium on Spanish Second Language
Acquisition, Austin, TX. Retrieved December 30, 2008, from
http://sedl.org/loteced/comparing_assessment.html
Lombardi, M.M. (2008). Making the Grade: The Role of Assessment in Authentic
Learning. Educause learning initiative. Advancing learning through it
innovation. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0.
Lovrich, D. (2004). A ladder of thinking. The Science Teacher, 71(4), 56 - 59.
Lubezky, A., Dori, J.Y., & Zoller, U. (2004). Hocs- promoting assessment on
environment-related undergraduate chemistry. Chemistry Education: Research
and Practice‚ 5 (2), 175-184.
177
Luca, J., McMahon, M. (2004). Promoting metacognition through negotiated
assessment. In R. Atkinson, C. McBeath, D. Jonas-Dwyer & R. Phillips (Eds),
Beyond the comfort zone: Proceedings of the 21st ASCILITE Conference (pp.
562-570). Perth, 5-8 December.
http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/perth04/procs/luca.html.
Lukhele, R., Thissen, D., & Wainer, H. (1993). On the relative value of multiple-
choice, constructed-response, and examinee-selected items on two
achievement tests. Program Statistics Research Technical Report No. 93-28.
Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Lumley, T. (2002). Assessment criteria in a large-scale writing test: What do they
really mean to raters? Language Testing, 19, 246-276.
Madaus, G. F., & O‘Dwyer, L. M. (1999). A short history of performance assessment:
Lessons learned. Phi Delta Kappan, 688-695.
Mahajan, D. S.‚ Singh, G. S. (2005). Instructional Strategies in Organic Chemistry
Teaching: Perception of Science and Agriculture Undergraduate students in
Botswana, Education, 123(4), 714.
Maher, C.A., Davis, R.B., & Alston, A. (1992). A teacher's struggle to assess student
cognitive growth. In R. Lesh & S. Lamon (Eds.), Assessment of authentic
performance in school mathe- matics (pp. 249-264). Washington, DC:
American Association for the Advancement of Science.
Manitoba Education, Citizenship and Youth. (2003). Independent Together:
Supporting the Multilevel Learning Community. Winnipeg, MB: Manitoba
Education, Citizenship and youth.
Maqsud, M. (1997). Effects of metacognitive skills and nonverbal ability397.
Martinez, M. E. (2006). What is metacognition? Phi Delta Kappan, 696-699.
Martinez, M. E., & Katz, I. R. (1996). Cognitive processing requirements of
constructed figural response and multiplechoice items in architecture
assessment. Educational Assessment, 3(1), 83-98.
178
Marzano.R .(1998). Checking for understanding and encouraging Meta cognition
.Intel. education: Assessing projects:Using Assessment to improve teaching
and learning. www. educate.intel.com.
McBrien, J. L., & Brandt, R. S. (1997). The language of learning: A guide to
education terms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum
Development.
McCormick, C. B. (2006). Metacognition and learning. In P. A. Alexander, & P. H.
Winne (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology (2nd ed., pp. 79-102).
Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
McNamara, T. F. (1996). Measuring second language performance. London:
Longman.
McTighe, J., & Ferrara, S. (1998). Assessing learning in the classroom. Washington,
DC: National Education Association.
Mehrens, W. A. (1991). Defensible/Indefensible Instructional Preparation for High
Stakes Achievement Tests: An Exploratory Trialogue. Paper presented at the
Annual Meetings of the Educational Research Association and the National
Council on Measurement in Education, Chicago, IL.
Meloth, M. S. (1990). Changes in poor readers‘ knowledge of cognition and the
association of knowledge of cognition with regulation of cognition and
reading comprehension. J. Educ. Psychol. 82‚ 99-105.
Messick, S. (1994). The interplay of evidence and consequence in the validation of
performance assessments. Educational Researcher, 23(2), 13–23.
Messick, S. (1996). Validity of performance assessments. In G. Phillips (Ed.),
Technical issues in large-scale performance assessment (pp. 1–18).
Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
Millar, R., & Osborne, J. F. (Eds.). (1998). Beyond 2000: Science Education for the
Future. London: King's College London.
Miller, G. A., & Chapman, J. P. (2001). Misunderstanding Analysis of
Covariance. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110 (1), 40-48.
179
Millman, J., & Greene, J. (1993). The specification and development of tests of
achievement and ability. In R. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement, (3rd ed.,
pp. 335–366). Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
Mislevy, R., Steinberg, L., & Almond, R. (2002). Design and analysis in task-based
language assessment. Language Testing, 19(4), 477–496.
Mislevy, R., Wilson, M., Ercikan, K., & Chudowsky, N. (2003). Psychometric
principles in student assessment. In T. Kellaghan & D. Stufflebeam(Eds.),
International handbook of educational evaluation (pp. 489–532). Boston:
Kluwer Academic.
Morgil, İ., Çingör, N., Erökten, S., Yavuz, S. & Özyalçın Oskay, Ö. (2004).
Bilgisayar destekli kimya eğitiminde portfolyo çalışmaları [Portfolio studies in
computer assisted chemistry education]. The Turkish Online Journal of
Educational Technology – TOJET, 3(2), 105-118.
Morris, N. (1961). An historian‘s view of examinations. In S. Wiseman(Ed.),
Examinations and English education (pp. 1–43). Manchester, UK: Manchester
University Press.
Moskal, B. M. (2003). Recommendations for developing classroom performance
assessments and scoring rubrics. Practical Assessment, Research &
Evaluation, 8(14). Retrieved January 13, 2009, from
http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=8&n=14
Moss, P. A. (1992). Shifting conceptions of validity in educational measurement:
Implications for performance assessment. Review of Educational Research,
62(3), 229-258.
Mueller, J. (2010). Authentic assessment toolbox. Retrieved July 28, 2004, from
http://jonathan.mueller.faculty.noctrl.edu/toolbox/whatisit.htm
Mueller, J. (2008). Authentic Assessment Toolbox: What is Authentic Assessment?
Retrieved November 6, 2008‚
http://jonathan.mueller.faculty.noctrl.edu/toolbox/whatisit.htm
180
Muller, J. (2005). The Authentic Assessment Toolbox: Enhancing Student Learning
through Online Faculty Development. Journal of online learning and
teaching.1(1).
Muskie School of Public Service. (2010). Authentic Assessment in Infant & Toddler
Care Settings: Review of Recent Research. Cutler Institute for Health and
Social Policy. University of Southern Maine. http://muskie.usm.maine.edu.
National Academy of Education. (2008). Recovering the Promise of Standards-Based
Education. Education Policy Briefing Sheet presented that at the National
Academy of Education, Education Policy in Transition Public Forum,
Washington,
http://naeducation.org/White_Papers_Project_Standards_Assessments_and_A
ccountability_Briefing_Sheet.pdf
National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards.
Washington DC: National Academy of Sciences.
National Science Education Standards. (1996). Changing Emphases in Assessment of
Student Learning. National Academy of Sciences. Courtesy of the National
Academies Press. Washington, DC.
National Center for Fair and Open Testing .(1992). What Is Authentic Assessment?
Cambridge, MA. NCFOT.
National Council on Education Standards and Testing (1992). Raising standards for
American Education. Washington, DC: Author.
Nbina, J. B., & Viko, B. (2010). Effect of instruction in Metacognitive self-
assessment strategy on Chemistry Students self-efficacy and achievement.
University of Port Harcourt .P.O. Box 3 Choba, Rivers State.
Newmann, F. M.‚ & Archbald, D. A. (1992) The nature of authentic academic
achievement, in: H. Berlak, F. M. Newmann, E. Adams, D. A. Archbald, T.
Burgess, J. Raven and T. A. Romberg Toward a new science of educational
testing and assessment(Albany, New York, USA, SUNY Press).
181
Niemi, D., Baker, E. L., & Sylvester, R.M. (2007). Scaling up, scaling down: Seven
years of performance assessment devolpment in the nation‘s second largest
school district. Educational Assessment, 12(3 & 4), 195-214.
Office of Technology Assessment. (1992). Testing in American schools: Asking the
right questions (OTA-SET-519). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing
Office.
Olfos, R., & Zulantay, H. (2007). Reliability and Validity of Authentic Assessment in
a Web Based Course. Educational Technology & Society, 10 (4), 156-173.
O‗Malley, J. M. & Valdez Pierce, L. (1996). Authentic assessment for English
language learners. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Ommundsen, Y. (2006). Pupils‘ self-regulation in physical education: the role of
motivational climates and differential achievement goals. Eur. Phys. Educ.
Rev. 2‚ 289-315.
Ommundsen, Y. (2003). Implicit theories of ability and self-regulation strategies in
physical education classes. Educ. Psychol. 23‚ 141-157.
O‘ Neil, H. F., & Brown, R. S. (1998). Differential effect of Question formats in Math
Assessment on metacognition and Affect. Applied Measurment in Education,
11(4), 331- 351.
O‘ Neil, H. F., & Abedi, J. (1996). Reliability and Validity of a state Metacognition
Inventory: Potential for Alternative Assessment. CRESST/ University of
California, Los Angeles.
O‘Neil, H. F., Sugrue, B., Abedi, J., Baker, E. L., & Golan, S. (1992). Final report of
experimental studies on motivation and NAEP test performance (Report to
NCES, Grant No. RS90159001). Los Angeles: University of California,
Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student testing.
Oosterhof, A. (2003). Developing and using classroom assess ament. Prentic. Hall.
Ozsoy, G., & Asaman, A. (2009). The effect of metacognitive strategy training on
mathematical problem solving achievement. International Electronic Journal
of Elementary Education‚1( 2).
182
Pallant, J. (2001), Methods for clinical therapists,Churchill livingstone, National
library of Australia.
Palm, T. (2008). Performance Assessment and Authentic Assessment: A Conceptual
Analysis of the Literature. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation,
13(4), 1-11.
Pappa, E., Zafiropoulou, M., & Metallidou, P. (2003). Intervention on strategy use
and on motivation of Greek pupils‘ reading comprehension in English classes.
Percept. Mot. Skills 96‚773-786.
Paris, S. G.‚ & Winograd, P. (1990). Promoting metacognition and motivation of
exceptional children. Remedial and Special Education, 11(6), 7-15.
Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2005). Results that matter: 21st century skills
and high school reform. Retrieved January 23, 2008, from
http://www.21stcenturyskills.org.
Pellegrino, J. W. (2006). Rethinking and redesigning curriculum, instruction ad
assessment: what contemporary research and theory suggests. A paper
commissioned by the National Center on Education and the Economy for the
New Commission on the Skills of the American Workforce. Washington DC:
National Center on Education and the Economy.
Pellegrino, J. W., Chudowsky, N., & Glaser, R. (Eds.). (2001). Knowing what
students know: The science and design of educational assessment.
Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Pierce, L.V. (2002). Performance-Based Assessment: Promoting Achievement for
English Language Learners.Clearinghouse on language and linguistics. Center
for applied linguistics‚ 26(1).
Pintrich, P. R. (2002). The role of metacognitive knowledge in learning, teaching, and
assessment. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 219-225.
Pintrich P.R. (2002), The role of metacognitive knowledge in learning, teaching, and
assessing, Theor. Pract., 41, 219-225.
Pintrich, P. R., Wolters, C. A., & Baxter, G. P. (2000). Assessing metacognition and
self-regulated learning. In G. Schraw, & J. Impara (Eds.), Issues in the
183
Measurement of Metacognition (pp. 43 - 97). University of Nebraska: Buros-
Nebraska Series on Measurement and Testing.
Pintrich, P., & De Groot, E. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning
components of classroom academic performance. J. Educ. Psychol. 82‚33-40.
Pokay, P., Blumenfeld, P. (1990). Predicting achievement early and late in semester:
the role of motivation and use of learning strategies. J. Educ. Psychol. 82‚ 41-
50.
Popham, W. J. (2001). Teaching to the Test? Educational Leadership, 58(6), 16-20.
Pressley, M., Van Etten, S., Yokoi, L., Freebern, G., & Van Meter, P. (1998). The
metacognition of college studentship: A grounded theory approach. In D. J.
Pressley, M., Ghatala, ES. (1990). Self-regulated learning: monitoring learning from
text. Educ. Psychol. 25‚19-33.
Quellmalz, E. S. (1991). Developing criteria for performance assessments: The
missing link. Applied Measurement in Education, 4(4), 319-331.
Registry of Interpreters for the Deaf. (2006). Testing and testing process. Retrieved
January 8, 2008. from www.rid.org/education/testing/ index.cfm
Resnick, L. B., & Resnick, D. P. (1982). Assessing the thinking curriculum: New
tools for educational reform. In B. G. Gifford & M. C. O‘Conner (Eds.).,
Changing assessment: Alternative views of aptitude, achievement and
instruction(pp. 37-55), Boston: Kluwer Academics.
Rickey, D., & Stacy, A. M. (2000). The role of metacognition in learning chemistry.
Journal of Chemical Education, 77(7), 915.
Rickey, D. (1999). The effects of laboratory curriculum and instruction on
undergraduate students' understanding of chemistry. (Ph.D., University of
California, Berkeley).
Ridley, K. L.‚ & Stern, B. S. (1998). Using authentic assessment and qualitative
methodology to bridge theory and practice. The Educational Forum, 62(2),
178-185.
184
Roberts, L., Wilson, M., & Draney, K. (1997). The SEPUP assessment system: An
overview (BEAR Report Series SA-97-1). Berkeley: University of California,
Berkeley Evaluation and Assessment Research Center.
Rudolph, F. (1990). The American college and university: A history. Athens:
University of Georgia Press.
Ruiz-Primo, M., & Shavelson, R. (1996). Rhetoric and reality in science performance
assessment: An update. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(10),
1045–1063.
Rust, Christ. (2002). Assessment‘, in Assessment strategies for Pop Music
Performance, University of Salford Dept of Music, FDTL Project
POP.Learning and Teaching Briefing Papers Series, 1.
Sadler, D. R. (1987). Specifying and promulgating achievement standards. Oxford
Review of Education, 13(2), 191-209.
Safari, Y.‚ & Marzoughi, R. (2010). Experimental study of analyzing the effects of
meta-cognition approaches of teaching on educational condition and meta-
cognition intelligence of students in their elementary school schedule. Journal
of DaneshvarRaftar,3188-1028.
Santiago, G. (2008). Design and validation a multi-method assessment of meta-
cognition and study of the effectiveness of meta-cognitive interventions. Ph.D
thesis. Clemson University. etd.lib.clemson.edu/documents/1219850998/umi-
clemson-1711.pdf.
Saskatchewan Education. (1991). Student Evaluation: A Teacher Handbook. www.
Sasked. Sk. ca/k/pecs/student/eva.
Sari, P. L., & Wiyarsi, A. (2011). Effectiveness of performance assessment towards
chemistry learning productivity and motivation of senior high-school students
in special region of Yogyakarta. eprints.uny.ac.id/2706.
Schoen, H., Cebulla, K., Finn, K., & Fi, C. (2003). Teacher variables that relate to
student achievement when using a standards-based curriculum. Journal for
Research in Mathematics Education, 34(3), 228-259.
185
Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science
education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning.
Research in Science Education, 36, 111-139.
Schraw G., Brooks D.W. and Crippen, K.J., (2005), Using an interactive,
compensatory model of learning to improve chemistry teaching, J. Chem.
Educ., 82, 637-640.
Schraw, G.‚ & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology
Review, 7(4), 351-371.
Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness.
Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 460-475.
Schunk, D. H., Zimmerman, B. J. (1994). Self-regulation of learning performance:
Issues and educational applications, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Hillsdale
NJ.
Segers, M.‚ Martens, R.‚ & Bossche, P. (2008).Understanding how a case-based
assessment instrument influences student teachers learning approaches.
Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 1751-1764.
Shamir, A., Mevarech, Z., & Gidac, C.(2008). The Assessment of Meta-Cognition in
different context: individualized vs. peer assisted learning. Journal of
Humanities, Social science and Law. Metacognition learning‚ 4(1), 46-61.
Shavelson, R., Solano-Flores, G., & Ruiz-Primo, M. (1998). Toward a science
performance assessment technology. Evaluation and Program Planning,
21(2), 171–184.
Shepard, L. A. (2000). The Role of Classroom Assessment in Teaching and Learning.
Center for Research on Education, Diversity and Excellence, University of
California, Santa Cruz, 1156 High Street Santa Cruz, CA 95064 (408) 459-
3500.
Shevelson, R. J., Baxter, G. P., & Pine, J. (1991). Performance assessment in science.
Applied Measurement in Education, 4, 347-362.
She, J. L., Tasi, Y. M., Chiu, M. H., & Chen, H. J. (2007). The Performance of
Taiwan‘s Undergraduates in Organic Chemistry Laboratory. Graduate
186
Institute of Science Education, National Taiwan Normal University Taipei,
10617, Taiwan.
Shen, C. Y., & Liu, H. C. (2011). Metacognitive Skills Development: A Web-based
Approach In Higher Education. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of
Educational Technology‚ 10(2).
Shepard, L. A. (2000). The Role of Assessment in a Learning Culture. Educational
Researcher, 29(7), 11.
Smilkstein, R. (2003). We're Born to Learn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Sperling, R. A., Howard, B. C., & Staley, R. (2004). Metacognition and self-
regulated learning constructs. Educational Research and Evaluation, 10, 117-
139.
Snow, R. (1993). Construct validity and constructed-response tests. In R. Bennett &
W. Ward (Eds.), Construction versus choice in cognitive measurement (pp.
45–60). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Sommer, R. & Sommer, B. (1986). A Practical Guide to Behavioral Research (5th
ed.). New York: Oxford University Press. First edition published in 1980.
Spady, W. G. (1992). It‘s time to take a close look at outcome-based education.
outcomes, 6-12.
Starch, D. & Elliot, E. (1912). Reliability of grading high school work in English.
School Review, 20, 442–457.
Starch, D., & Elliot, E. (1913). Reliability of grading high school work in
mathematics. School Review, 21, 254–259.
StatSoft, Inc. (2012). Electronic Statistics Textbook. Tulsa, OK: StatSoft. WEB:
http://www.statsoft.com/textbook/.
Stecher, B. (2010). Performance Assessment in an Era of Standards-Based
Educational Accountability. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Stanford
Center for Opportunity Policy in Education. http://edpolicy.stanford.edu.
Stecher, B., Barron, S., Chun, T., & Ross, K. (2000). The effects of the Washington
state education reform in schools and classrooms (CSE Tech. Rep. NO. 525).
187
Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on
Evaluation, Standards and Student Testing.
Stiggins, R. J. (2002). Assessment crisis: The absence of assessment FOR learning.
Phi Delta Kappan, 83 (10), 758-765.
Stiggins, R. J. (2002). Leadership for Excellence in Assessment: A Powerful New
School district Planning Guide. Portland, OR: Assessment Training Institute.
Stiggins, R. (1987a). Design and development of performance assessments.
Educational Measurement: Issues and Practices, 6(3), 33–42.
Stiggins, R. (1987b). Instructor‘s guide for Design and Development of Performance
Assessments. Retrieved May 18, 2008, from www.ncme. org/pubs/items.cfm.
Swanson, H. L. (1990). Influence of metacognitive knowledge and aptitude on
problem solving. J. Educ. Psychol. 82‚ 306-314.
Swartz, R. J. (2001). ―Infusing Critical and Creative Thinking into Content
Instruction‖, in ―Developing Minds‖, edited by A. L. Costa, 3rd Edition, p.
271, ASCD.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using Multivariate Statistics (5th ed.).
Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.
Tansaz, F., & Tavousi, M. N. ( 2011). The Relationship between Meta- Cognitive
and Achievement in Special Texts in English Course of the University
Students. Journal of Curriculum Plannin‚1197-28.
Te Puna Puoru National Centre for Research in Music Education and Sound
Arts.(2010). Metacognition et al. E-Journal of studies in music education‚
9(1). www.merc.canterbury.ac.nz.
Tharp, R. G., & Gallimore, R. (1988). Rousing minds to life: Teaching, learning, and
schooling in social context. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Thomas, G., Anderson, D., & Nashon, S. (2008). Development of an Instrument
Designed to Investigate Elements of Science Students‘ Meta-cognition, Self-
Efficacy and Learning Processes: The SEMLI-S. International Journal of
Science Educationl‚ 30(13), 17.
188
Thomas, G. P. (2006). Metacognition and science education: Pushing forward from a
solid foundation. Research in Science Education, 36, 1-6.
Tien, L. T., Teichert, M. A., & Rickey, D. (2007). Effectiveness of a MORE
laboratory module in prompting students to revise their molecular-level ideas
about solutions. Journal of Chemical Education, 84(1), 175-181.
Ting, Y. C.‚ & Yi, T. C. (2009). Cooperative learning in e-learning: a peer assessment
of student- centered using consistent fuzzy preferences. Expert system with
Applications‚ 36, 8342-8349.
Tippa, J.‚ & Pardo. (2006). A. Assessment of learning environmental quality from the
point of view of secondary and high school learners. Learning and Education,
16, 295-309.
Tough, S.‚ & Reed, J. (2006). Curriculum, assessment and pedagogy: Beyond the
―standards agenda‖. London: Institute for Public Policy Research.
Tsai, C. (2001). A review and discussion of epistemological commitments,
metacognition, and critical thinking with suggestion on their enhancement in
internet-assisted chemistry classrooms. Journal of Chemical Education, 78(7),
970-974.
VanTassel-Baska, J., Jonson, D., & Avery, L. (2002). Using performance tasks in the
identification of economically disadvantaged and minority gifted learners:
Findings from Project STAR. Gifted Child Quarterly46(2), 110–123.
Veenman, M. V. J., & Spaans, M. A. (2005). Relation between intellectual and
metacognitive skills: age and task differences. Learn. Ind. Diff. 15‚159-176.
Veenman M. V. J., Elshout J. J.‚ & Meijer‚ J. (1997). The generality vs. domain-
specificity of metacognitive skills in novice learning across domains, Learn.
Instr, 7, 187-209.
Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority. (2010). Chemistry: Victorian Certifi
cate of Education Study Design. 33 St Andrews Place, East Melbourne,
Victoria 3002,15.
Volkwein, J. F. (2003). ―Implementing Outcomes Assessment on Your Campus.‖ The
RP Group EJournal‚1(1).
189
Wadsworth, B. J.(1989). Piaget‘s theory of cognitive and affective development. 4th
ed. New York: Longman.
Wang, T. (2010). Web-based dynamic assessment: Taking assessment as teaching as
teaching and learning strategy for improving student's e-learning effectiveness.
Computers & Education, 54, 1157-1160.
Wang, J., Lien Kao, H.‚ & wen Lin, S. (2010). Preservice teacher's initial conceptions
about assessment of science learning: the coherence with their views of
learning science. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29, 522-529.
Whitebread, D., Coltman, P., Pasternak, D. P., Sangster, C., Grau, V., Bingham, S.,
Almeqdad, Q., & Demetriou, D. (2009). The development of two
observational tools for assessing metacognition and self-regulated learning in
young children. Metacognition and Learning, 4(1), 63-85.
Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by Design (2nd ed.). Alexandria,
VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Wiggins, G. P. (1993). Assessing Student Performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
Publishers. (p. 229).
Wiggins, G. (1989). A true test: Toward more authentic and equitable assessment. Phi
Delta Kappan, 70, 703-713.
Wilburne, J. M. (1997). The effect of teaching metacognition strategies to pre-service
elementary school teachers on their mathematical problem-solving
achievement and attitude. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Temple
University.
Wiles, W. (1997). The effect of metacognitive strategies program on academic
performance, perceived success and control for adults returning to school for
academic upgrading. Ph.D. thesis. University of Alberta at Edmonton.
www.nlc-bnc.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk3/ftp05/nq23090.pdf.
Wilson, M., & Sloane, K. (in press). From principles to practice: An embedded
assessment system. Applied Measurement in Education.
190
Winfield, L. E., & Woodard, M. D. (1994). Assessment, equity and diversity in
reforming America's school. Educational policy, 8(1), 3-27.
Wisconsin Education Association Council. (1996). Performance Assessment,
Education Issues Series, Used with permission.
Yap, E. G. (1993). A structural model of self-regulated academic learning in math
achievement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Los Angeles, University of
Southern California.
Yildiz, E., Akpinar, E., Tatar, N., & Ergin, O. (2009). Exploratory and Confirmatory
Factor Analysis of the Metacognition Scale for Primary School Students.
Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri / Educational Sciences: Theory &
Practice‚ 9 (3).
Zare, H., & Mohammadi, A. N. (2011). Effect of meta-cognitive methods of
teaching in solving mathematic problems of students. Quarterly Journal of
New Approaches in Educational‚ 6(5)‚ 2008-6369.
Zimmerman, B. J., Schunk D. H. (1989). Self-regulated learning and academic
achievement: Theory, practice, research, Springer-Verlag: New York.