Date post: | 17-Jul-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | national-physical-laboratory |
View: | 636 times |
Download: | 1 times |
Ambient Vacuum
Frequency-modulated Kelvin probe force microscopy
Scanning probe microscopy – transport in variable environments
Raman characterisation
Introduction Methods
Acknowledgments
Conclusions
Ambient Vacuum Nitrogen 20 % R.H. 40 % R.H. 60 % R.H. Ambient
Mono-layer
2LG island
Work function maps of the mono-layer graphene transferred to SiO2 (with 2LG islands) in controlled environmental conditions.
• Significant decrease of WF and hole concentration in vacuum → desorption of water and other p-dopants present onthe graphene surface.
• Gradual increase of WF and hole concentration → water is a strong p dopant.• Saturation of WF and hole concentration → water saturates the graphene surface and is not the only dopant in
ambient air.• Bi-layer graphene behaves as two decoupled layers, with only the top layer affected by humidity (response similar to
mono-layer).• Weak interaction between mono-layer and twisted 2LG results in different response compared to de-coupled bi-
layers.
We acknowledge the support of EC grants Graphene Flagshipand the IRD Graphene Project. The work was carried out aspart of an Engineering Doctorate Program in Micro- andNanoMaterials and Technologies, financially supported by theEPSRC, the University of Surrey and the National PhysicalLaboratory.
𝜆 = 532 𝑛𝑚
Mono-layer graphene: Narrow and symmetrical 2D peak → substrate iscovered with mono-layer graphene.2LG islands: Narrow and symmetrical, but shifted 2D peak → twisted (notAB stacked) 2LG graphene.
• The two-dimensional nature of graphene makes it sensitive to environmental doping.• With water vapour being a significant component of the ambient air, graphene-based devices designed to operate in
ambient air (e.g. sensors) will be significantly affected, as their electronic properties can change with humidity.• For the successful commercialisation of graphene-based devices, the complete understanding of the water-graphene
interactions is necessary.• We employ simultaneously local Kelvin probe force microscopy (KPFM) and global transport measurements in the van
der Pauw geometry to observe the effects of water on the work function (WF) and carrier concentration of chemicalvapour deposition (CVD) grown graphene of different thicknesses transferred on SiO2.
• We probe the local electronic properties of mono- and bi-layer graphene in a series of measurements in controlledenvironments, starting from ambient (~30 % R.H.), to vacuum, pure nitrogen and 20-60% relative humidity (RH).
• Raman spectroscopy and mapping is used to assess the graphene thickness and structure.
• KPFM showed significant decrease of WF in vacuum which is associated withdesorption of water and other p-dopants present in ambient air. This was alsoobserved as a decrease in hole concentration (transport measurements).
• In vacuum, both the hole concentration and WF are higher for the mono-layercompared to bi-layer graphene on SiO2→ screening of substrate charges.
• Introduction of nitrogen and water vapour mixture with a gradual change ofhumidity from 20 to 60% RH results in an increase in the hole concentrationand WF, however the value does not reach ambient levels → water vapour isnot the only p-dopant in the ambient air that affects graphene.
• Graphene surface saturates with water at humidity levels higher than ~40% R. H. This can be seen from thesaturation in hole concentration and WF.
• Upon exposure to ambient air, the carrier concentration is not fully restored → long restoring time is needed.
• Raman spectroscopy/mapping indicated that the mono-layer sample is covered with 1LG film, decorated withtwisted 2LG nucleation islands. The bi-layer samples are covered with decoupled (not AB stacked) 2LG films.
N2 20% R.H. 40% R.H. 60% R.H.
Ambient Vacuum N2 20% R.H. 40% R.H. 60% R.H.
Bi-layer
eV
eV
eV
eV
Work function maps of the bi-layer graphene transferred to SiO2 in controlled environmental conditions.
Am
bien
t
Vac
uum
Nitr
ogen
20%
R.H
.
40%
R.H
.
60%
R.H
.
Am
bien
t
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
4.7
4.8
4.9
5.0
5.1
5.2
5.3
Wo
rk fu
nctio
n (
eV
)
Environmental condition
Mono-layer WF
2LG islands WF
Bi-layer WF
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
Mono-layer hole concentration
Bi-layer hole concentration
Ho
le c
on
cen
tra
tion
(10
12 c
m-2)
G-Peak intensity
680
3000
1200 1400 1600 2600 2700 2800
Raman shift (cm-1)
Mono-layer
2LG island 1
2LG island 2
2LG island 3
D GD’ 2D
2D-Peak intensity
680
1450
G-Peak shift
1570 cm-1
1610 cm-1
Tip calibration: ΦTip≈ΦHOPG+eUCPD (ΦHOPG =4.48 eV)
Mono-layer
2LG islands
Substrate
Effect of humidity on electronic properties of CVD grapheneC. Melios1,2, V. Panchal1, C.E. Giusca1, A. Centeno3, A. Zurutuza3, S.R.P. Silva2 and O. Kazakova1
1National Physical Laboratory, Hampton Road, Teddington, TW11 0LW, UK2Advanced Technology Institute, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, UK
3Graphenea SA, 20018 Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain
Email: [email protected]