+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Effect of Wet Processing on the Tearing Strength of...

Effect of Wet Processing on the Tearing Strength of...

Date post: 09-Sep-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
6
r- - -- -- _ __ .. n - •••••••••••• _n. Indian Journal of Textile Research Vol. 9, September 1984, pp. 106-111 Effect of Wet Processing on the Tearing Strength of PolyesterNiscose Rayon Blended Fabrics I C SHARMA, S D DESHPANDE, 0 P JAISWANI & BPS CHAUHAN The Technological Institute of Textiles, Bhiwani 125022 Received 2 June 1983; accepted 6 April 1984 The effect of different wet-processing stages, viz. grey polyester stage, tint washing, scouring, heat-setting, polyester dyeing, viscose dyeing, singeing and finishing, on the tearing strength of plain woven polyesterfviscose(65:35) blended fabrics has been studied. The effect of change in single-thread strength, yarn pull-out force, yarn crimp and extension at break due to wet- processing on tearing strength has also been studied. The causes for change in tearing strength after different processing stages are discussed. The relationship between the ratio of single-thread strength to the yarn pull-out force of opposite set of threads and tearing strength has been examined. When the fabric was finished with a softening agent there was a considerable increase in tearing strength. In practice, a fabric fails more often because of poor tearing strength than because of poor tensile strength. The tearing strength is one of the most important mechanjcal characteristics of a fabric and while assessing the fabric quality, emphasis should be laid on this characteristic as it directly affects the serviceability of a fabric and also takes into account almost all the important factors entering into the service conditions. Tearing strength is highly sensitive to slight variations in finishing-filling and lubrication. There is little published work on such finishing processes like scouring, bleaching and dyeing with the exception of that done by Huebner1•2. Different finishing processes can affect tearing strength by altering the single-thread strength, thread slippage, and possibly by influencing other properties. Changes in such structural properties as thread spacing and crimp may also occur in the finishing process and lea.d to changes in tearing strength. The thread slippage may be affected by (t) increased friction, which, in turn, is caused by scouring, (ii) a reduction in friction due to lubrication, and (iii) sticking and filling-up of the threads. In the course of the present work, the effect of different wet- processing stages, such as grey-stage, tint-washing, scouring, heat-setting, polyester-dyeing, viscose- dyeing, singeing and finishing, on tearing strength of plain-woven polyester/viscose (65:35) fabric has been studied. The effect on tearing strength of changes in different parameters, such as single-thread strength, yam withdrawal force, crimp and extension at break, because of wet-processing, has also been studied. Materials and Methods Preparationof fabric sample-The fabric sample 106 was prepared from 65/35 polyester-viscose blend in plain weave with 60 ends/in and 52 picks/in. Yam of2/ 34s count was used in both warp and weft directions. The grey width of cloth was 147cm, while the required finished width was 137-140 cm. Tint-washing- The fabric was moved 4 times from one end to the other end of the jigger, water being used at normal temperature without the addition of chemicals and auxiliaries. Scouring-During scouring, the fabric was moved 8 times from one end to the other end of jigger at 85°C using soda ash (5.0 g/Iitre) and an anionic detergent (0.5 gjIitre). The fabric was washed with hot water and later with cold water, and dried on a pin stenter at 150- 160°e. Heat-setting- The cloth was heat-set on a pin stenter at 205°C, keeping dwell period at 40 sand the overfeed at about 4%. Polyester-dyeing- The polyester component of the fabric was dyed with a disperse dye in a high- temperature and high-pressure beam dyeing machine at a material-to-liquor ratio of 1:15 for 60 min at J30°e. The dye concentration, on the weight of the fabric, was 3.8%, the concentrations of other chemicals used being: acetic acid, 1.2 g/litre; carrier, 1.0 g/Iitre; and dispersing agent, 0.5 gjIitre. The pH was kept at 5.5. Viscose-dyeing- The viscose component of fabric was vat-dyed on a jigger dyeing machine with 2.3% (separately vatted) vat dyes on the weight of fabric at a material: liquor ratio of 1:3. The dyeing temperature was kept at 80°C for first three ends and dyeing was continued for three ends more, keeping steam supply off. The chemicals added were caustic soda (15 gjIitre)
Transcript
Page 1: Effect of Wet Processing on the Tearing Strength of …nopr.niscair.res.in/bitstream/123456789/32992/1/IJFTR 9(3... · 2016. 7. 20. · later with cold water, and dried on a pin stenter

r - - -- -- _ __..n - •••••••••••• _n.

Indian Journal of Textile Research

Vol. 9, September 1984, pp. 106-111

Effect of Wet Processing on the Tearing Strength ofPolyesterNiscose Rayon Blended Fabrics

I C SHARMA, S D DESHPANDE, 0 P JAISWANI & BPS CHAUHAN

The Technological Institute of Textiles, Bhiwani 125022

Received 2 June 1983; accepted 6 April 1984

The effect of different wet-processing stages, viz. grey polyester stage, tint washing, scouring, heat-setting, polyester dyeing,viscose dyeing, singeing and finishing, on the tearing strength of plain woven polyesterfviscose(65:35) blended fabrics has beenstudied. The effect of change in single-thread strength, yarn pull-out force, yarn crimp and extension at break due to wet­processing on tearing strength has also been studied. The causes for change in tearing strength after different processing stagesare discussed. The relationship between the ratio of single-thread strength to the yarn pull-out force of opposite set of threadsand tearing strength has been examined. When the fabric was finished with a softening agent there was a considerable increasein tearing strength.

In practice, a fabric fails more often because of poortearing strength than because of poor tensile strength.The tearing strength is one of the most importantmechanjcal characteristics of a fabric and whileassessing the fabric quality, emphasis should be laid onthis characteristic as it directly affects the serviceabilityof a fabric and also takes into account almost all theimportant factors entering into the service conditions.

Tearing strength is highly sensitive to slightvariations in finishing-filling and lubrication. There islittle published work on such finishing processes likescouring, bleaching and dyeing with the exception ofthat done by Huebner1•2. Different finishing processescan affect tearing strength by altering the single-threadstrength, thread slippage, and possibly by influencingother properties. Changes in such structural propertiesas thread spacing and crimp may also occur in thefinishing process and lea.d to changes in tearingstrength. The thread slippage may be affected by(t) increased friction, which, in turn, is caused byscouring, (ii) a reduction in friction due to lubrication,and (iii) sticking and filling-up of the threads. In thecourse of the present work, the effect of different wet­processing stages, such as grey-stage, tint-washing,scouring, heat-setting, polyester-dyeing, viscose­dyeing, singeing and finishing, on tearing strength ofplain-woven polyester/viscose (65:35) fabric has beenstudied. The effect on tearing strength of changes indifferent parameters, such as single-thread strength,yam withdrawal force, crimp and extension at break,because of wet-processing, has also been studied.

Materials and Methods

Preparationof fabric sample-The fabric sample

106

was prepared from 65/35 polyester-viscose blend inplain weave with 60 ends/in and 52 picks/in. Yam of2/34s count was used in both warp and weft directions.The grey width of cloth was 147cm, while the requiredfinished width was 137-140 cm.

Tint-washing- The fabric was moved 4 times fromone end to the other end of the jigger, water being usedat normal temperature without the addition ofchemicals and auxiliaries.

Scouring-During scouring, the fabric was moved 8times from one end to the other end of jigger at 85°Cusing soda ash (5.0 g/Iitre) and an anionic detergent(0.5 gjIitre). The fabric was washed with hot water andlater with cold water, and dried on a pin stenter at 150­160°e.

Heat-setting- The cloth was heat-set on a pinstenter at 205°C, keeping dwell period at 40 sandthe overfeed at about 4%.

Polyester-dyeing- The polyester component of thefabric was dyed with a disperse dye in a high­temperature and high-pressure beam dyeing machineat a material-to-liquor ratio of 1:15 for 60 min atJ30°e. The dye concentration, on the weight of thefabric, was 3.8%, the concentrations of other chemicalsused being: acetic acid, 1.2 g/litre; carrier, 1.0 g/Iitre;and dispersing agent, 0.5 gjIitre. The pH was kept at5.5.

Viscose-dyeing-The viscose component of fabricwas vat-dyed on a jigger dyeing machine with 2.3%(separately vatted) vat dyes on the weight of fabric at amaterial: liquor ratio of 1:3. The dyeing temperaturewas kept at 80°C for first three ends and dyeing wascontinued for three ends more, keeping steam supplyoff. The chemicals added were caustic soda (15 gjIitre)

Page 2: Effect of Wet Processing on the Tearing Strength of …nopr.niscair.res.in/bitstream/123456789/32992/1/IJFTR 9(3... · 2016. 7. 20. · later with cold water, and dried on a pin stenter

SHARMA et at.: EFFECT OF WET PROCESSING ON TEARING STRENGTH OF BLENDED FABRICS

and sodium hydrosulphite (15 gjlitre). After dyeing,the fabric was dried on a pin stenter.

Singeing-Both sides of the fabric were singed at aspeed of 90 m/min.

Finishing- The fabric was given a silicone finish ona pin stenter with silicone emulsion (20 gjlitre), cationicsoftener (20 g/litre) and catalyst (4 g/litre) at about160°C with required dimensions and overfeed.

Before testing, all the fabric samples obtained atdifferent processing stages were conditioned instandard atmosphere (RH 65%( 27 ±2°C) for 48 hr.Standard test methods as laid down in the B.S.Handbook3 were adopted to determine the yarn andfabric characteristics.

The yarn crimp in both warp and weft directions wasmeasured on a Eureka crimp tester (Type FY -07) bytaking 0.5 ±0.05 g/tex tension and a 20 cm test length.The single-thread strength and extension at break of allthe samples in warp and weft directions were measuredon an Instron tensile tester, by taking 1000g full-scaleload and 500± I mm clamping length. Both the cross­head and chart speeds were kept at 100 mm/min.Twenty observations, 10for warp and 10for weft, weremade for each sample.

For testing the fabric tear strength, single rip test wasadopted. From each sample obtained at differentprocessing stages, 10 strips were cut, 5 in warpdirection and 5 in weft direction, so that no two stripscontained, as far as possible, the same warp yarn forthe strip of warp tear test or the same weft yarn for thestrip of weft tear test. The tests were performed on anInstron tensile testing machine, by keeping both thecross-head and chart speeds at 100mm/min, and usinga clamping length of 100mm and the full-scale load at10 kg.

The yarn pull-out force was measured by taking a 5in long and 3 in wide fabric strip. Leaving 2 inches fromone end of the longer sides, to allow the specimen to begripped by the fabric jaws, and another 0.5 in for aclearance from the jaw line, a transverse cut was madeacross the width of the specimen. The specimen wasmarked across its width at a distance of I in from thetransverse cut and all the crossing threads in theremaining portion of the specimen were unravelled sothat the length of each of the freed longitudinal yarnsfrom the marked line was 1.5 in, the rear eod of thespecimen in the fabric form being already gripped by apair of fabric jaws. The yarn clamp, initially beingseparated from the jaws by a distance <?f2 in, was thenmoved apart until the yarn was completely withdrawnfrom the strip, the force required to remove it beingrecorded in an autographic device. Five observationseach for warp and weft directions were made and theaverage was calculated. Both the cross-head and chart

speeds were kept at 100 mm/min, the full-scale loadbeing 1000 g and clamping length, 50 mm.

Results and Discussion

The values of tearing strength, single-threadstrength, thread pull-out force, crimp and extension atbreak for warp and weft directions of all the fabricsamples are given in Table 1. Before performing thetest, each sample was examined by a magnifying glassto check that the weave pattern (plain) remained free ofany weaving defect throughout the fabric sample sothat the results are not affected by any kind of weavingdefect.

The data given in Table I show the tearing strengthas influenced by single-thread strength, thread pull-outforce, crimp and extension at break. The effect ofdifferent wet-processing stages, viz. grey stage, tintwashing, scouring, heat-setting, polyester-dyeing, vat­dyeing, singeing and finishing, on the tearing strengthof the fabric is also shown in Table I.

Effect of single-thread strength-Table I shows thatthe tearing strength of fabric increases with increase insingle-thread strength-a characteristic which has adirect effect on the fabric tear behaviour. With a higheryarn strength, the complete del assembly in the tearregion supports a higher load, resulting in increase inthe fabric tearing strength. This is in agreement withthe observation of O'Brien and Weiner5 that thetearing strength increases with increase in the threadstrength if other parameters like weave and fabriccount are kept the same. It has also been observed byother workers6•7 that increase in single-threadstrength, usually brought about by the use of coarseyarn, leads to increase in tearing strength.

Effect of crimp-Fig. I shows that the tearingstrength of the fabric reduces with increase in totalcrimp, the correlation coefficient between these twobeing about -0.37. This is in agreement withWilliams'8 finding that with a lower crimp, the area ofcontact between the threads is smaller and thefrictional resistance to the movement of threads is less.Because of this, the del area is more, and a greaternumber of cross yarns are brought into action duringtear, leading to increased supporting capacity of delassembly and a higher tearing strength. Harrison9 alsopointed out that the higher crimp of the threads in thecloth causes a reduction in the ease of slippage becausethe yarns are bent to a greater extent and hence lesstearing strength is recorded.

Effect of yarn extensibility-Table I shows that theextensibility of the yarns being ruptured plays animportant role. Although after heat-setting the ratiof!f~ decreased considerably, the tearing strengthremained unaffected, or was lowered only a little. Thisis because of increase in the extension at break of yarn

107

Page 3: Effect of Wet Processing on the Tearing Strength of …nopr.niscair.res.in/bitstream/123456789/32992/1/IJFTR 9(3... · 2016. 7. 20. · later with cold water, and dried on a pin stenter

INDIAN 1. TEXT. RES .. VOL. 9. SEPTEMBER 1984

Table II-Tearing Strength, Single-Thread Strength, Thread Pull-out Force, Crimp and Extension at Break of Fabric

Samples at Different Wet-Processing Stages -ParameterGreyTintScouredHeat-PolyesterViscoseSingedFinished

clothwashed setdyeddyed

Warp wayTearing strength,

4.0354.0433.8823.9903.2402.6752.6723.856kg

( -0.198)*(3.8)(I.I I)(19.7)(33.7)(33.78)(H3)Single thread

580.0582.0552.0525.0210.0480.0476.0485.0

strength (f), g( -0.345)(4.8)(9.45)(63.79)(17.24)(17.93)(16.38)

Thread pull-out

269.5262.0280.0376.0378.0431.5428.0228.3

force (fJ, g(2.78)( -3.896)( -39.52)( -40.26)(-60.11)(- 58.81)(15.29)

Ends/in64.0065.3366.0065.0067.6667.0067.3366.33

Crimp, %

15.516.012.520.020.017.017.018.0Extension, %

6.0906.2966.3049.0568.7527.9217.4287.614

fl/.

2.7102.8122.4321.8881.8681.4771.4692.622( -3.76)

(10.26)(30.33)(31.25)(45.498)(45.79)(3.24)

Weft wayTearing strength,

3.6303.5813.4103.2052.8982.4552.4363.689kg

(1.35)*(6.06)(11.71)(20.16)(32.51)(32.89)( - 1.625)Single-thread

645.0625.0506.0575.0567.0540.0542.5553.7

strength (f), g(3.1)(21.55)(10.85)(12.09)(16.28)(15.89)(14.16)

Thread pull-out

214.0207.0227.0278.0273.0325.0324.0185.0force (fJ, g

(3.27)( -6.075)(-29.91)( -27.57)(- 51.87)(- 51.40)(13.55)Picks/in

53.3354.3352.0058.3358.3355.0055.0055.66Crimp, %

7.259.508.758.0011.509.009.509.25Extension, %

6.6396.7306.8378.9728.6508.1907.6207.724f/J.

2.3932.3852.1611.5291.5001.2511.2672.425(0.33)

(9.695)(36.17)(37.32)(47.72)(47.05)(- 1.337)

*Values in parentheses show percentage variation with respect to grey-stage characteristics. Negative values show increase and positivevalues, decrease.

108

supporting a higher load. The results are in agreementwith those of Harrison9 who found that a more

extensible yarn leads to a more extensible fabric, whichallows a wider distribution of the stresses about the

point of application of the tear, and hence to a higher

tearing strength.

Effect of yarn pull-out force-Data on tearing

strength and yarn puU-out force (Table 1) show that

the tearing strength increases with decrease in the yarn

pull-out force for the opposite sets of yarns, i.e. the

higher tearing strength is the result of easy slippage of

cross-threads. This is in agreement with the finding of

Taylor6 that the tearing strength increases with

decrease in resistance to slippage of the cross-threads.

This is because the resistance to slippage of the cross­

yarn or the yarn pull-out force for the opposite set of

yarns plays an important role in determining the tearing

strength of the fabric. With increase in yarn pull-outforce, the del limits itself within a smaller area and

depth, bringing fewer yarns into action, which results

in reduced supporting capacity of the del system and

hence a lower tear strength.

Effect of the ratio single-thread strength/yarn pull-outforce-Fig. 2 shows that the tearing strength and the

ratio f/Is have a linear relationship, the coefficient of

B

o

... ..:~

7

T.OTAL CRIMP,'I,

00

26

01 I".x:x:tDzwcr 3

•...C/l

'-'Z~w•...

Fig. I-Relationship between crimp and tearing strength

-{·;·--c·· WEFT TEAR STRENGTH

-0---0 WARP TEAR STRENGTH

after heat-setting. The tear mechanism of the single-rip

tear testrreveals that the number of yarns in the ladder

of a del at the tear locus depends upon the amount of

yarn slippag~ and yarn extension. With a moreextensible yarn, the number of active threads in the del

increases and hence contributes more to the system in

Page 4: Effect of Wet Processing on the Tearing Strength of …nopr.niscair.res.in/bitstream/123456789/32992/1/IJFTR 9(3... · 2016. 7. 20. · later with cold water, and dried on a pin stenter

SHARMA et at.: EFFECT OF WET PROCESSING ON TEARING STRENGTH OF BLENDED FABRICS

Fig. 2-Relationship between/If. and tearing strength

-(:'-::'~ WE FT TEAR STRE NGTH

-0-0-WARP TEAk STRENGTH

correlation between two being +0.86 and +0.95 forwarp and weft tears respectively. O'Brien and Weiner5also observed that the single-thread strength dividedby the pull-out force for the opposite set of threads isdirectly related to tearing strength. They furtherobserved that in addition to being a measure of thread­slippage, as governed by the inter-thread friction,the yarn pull-out force reflects the crimp balance(defined as the ratio of the smaller to the larger crimp)and weave factor (defined as the ratio of the number ofthreads per repeat to the number of interlacements inthe same repeat) and hence could be used to determinethe deformability of a fabric, which is related to itstearing strength.

Tearing strength at grey stage-Table 1 shows thatthe warp tearing strength (4.0 kg) is higher than theweft tearing strength (3.6 kg). This is due to the higherf/Is ratio for warp tear, which is obviously the result oflow force required to withdraw a weft yarn, althoughthe single-thread strength for warp (580 g) is less thanthat for weft (645 g), which, in turn, is the result of lowweft crimp. The low single-thread strength for warp isbecause of subjecting the warp yarns to repeatedstresses and strains, and continual abrasion with healdeyes, reed, race board, etc., during weav.ing.

It is observed that warp te~r strength is higher thanthe weft tear strength at the other stages of processingalso, although at all the stages the single-threadstrength of warp is lesser.

Effect of tint washing-Data presented in Table 1

show that tint washing has no significant effect on thetearing strength of the fabric. This is as expected, forduring tint washing, only the tinting material isremoved by the use of water at normal temperaturewithout any addition of chemicals and auxiliaries.

Effect of scouring-Table 1 also shows that afterscouring the tearing strength reduces by 4-6% in boththe directions from the grey stage of fabric. A similartrend of reduction is observed in ratio f/Is, which is dueto the reduced single-thread strength (f) and increasedyarn withdrawal force for the opposite set of threads(fJ.

The loss in s~ngle-thread strength after scouring isbecause of the alkaline action of caustic soda on boththe polyester and viscose components of the blend .Shenai and Lokre10 reported that the polyester fibreundergoes alkaline hydrolysis in the presence of alkali,which results in loss of both strength and weight.

The surface ester groups of polyester fibres are firstattacked, thereby removing shorter polymer chains.These are further hydrolyzed, the reaction then goingto completion. The actual mechanism may involve thealkali attack on the electron-deficient carbonyl carbonatom, forming an intermediate.

Regenerated cellulosic fibres are highly susceptibleto chemical attack. Viscose, being a regeneratedcellulosic fibre, is largely a pure form of cellulose and,therefore, the strength loss is primarily due to thedissolution of low-molecular weight fractions of thecellulose polymer. Moreover, unlike cotton, viscose ismade up of disoriented fibrils and hence is more proneto chemical attack.

During the spinning of polyester/viscose blendedmaterial, viscose has a tendency to come on to thesurface of the resultant yarn and, therefore, theimmediate action of alkali during scouring affects theviscose component preferentially. The increased yarnpull-out force after scouring may be due to the partialsolubilizing action of alkali on the viscose, making itrough.

Effect of heat-setting- The data given in Table 1show that after heat-setting, the warp tearing strengthincreases marginally from 3.882 to 3.990 kg, while theweft tearing strength decreases from 3.410 to 3.205 kg.The table also shows that the ratio f/Is for both warpand weft is lowered considerably because of increasedyarn withdrawal force and decreased single-threadstrength.

The increase in yarn pull-out force is in agreementwith the finding of Marvin 11, who observed that thesetting of the polyester fabric is accompanied by aharshening or stiffening of the fabric, which detractsfrom its handle and draping qualities. The stiffening isdue to the formation of a continuous film on the

32

fI1s

2

1

::I:•....e>zwa:•....t/)e>z5:3~w•....

o

109

Page 5: Effect of Wet Processing on the Tearing Strength of …nopr.niscair.res.in/bitstream/123456789/32992/1/IJFTR 9(3... · 2016. 7. 20. · later with cold water, and dried on a pin stenter

INDIAN J. TEXT. RES., VOL. 9, SEPTEMBER 1984

filaments and high tension developed during setting, asa result of a tendency of the fabric to shrink duringheat-setting.

The single-thread strength in both warp and weftdirections is reduced by about 5% after heat-setting,while extension at break increases in both directions.This is probably due to the shortening of fibre matricesafter heat-setting, which, in turn, is the result of thepartial breakdown of inter-molecular cross-linksbecause of the high-thermal treatments involvedduring heat setting. The increase in extensibility ishigher' for warp than for weft because during heat­setting the overfeed is given generally in warpdirection.

The reduction in warp tearing strength after heat­setting due to lowfils ratio is well compensated for andeven il}creased marginally because of increased warpextens,on at break, while there is reduction in wefttearing strength due to lowfils ratio-the result oflessincrease in the extensibility of weft than warp afterheat-setting.

Effeft of polyester-dyeing- Table I shows that afterpolyester-dyeing the warp tearing strength decreasesfrom 3.99 to 3.24 kg, while the weft tearing strengthdecreases from 3.205 to 2.898 kg. The ratio fils is alsoreducel:i after polyester-dyeing because of decreasedsingle-thread strength. The reduction in single-threadstrengt~ may be due to high temperature (about 130°C)treatment involved in dyeing for a considerable periodof time and also due to the dissolution of trimers(oligol1)lers).

Effect of viscose-dyeing-After viscose-dyeing, thetearing strength of the fabric decreases by about 17%inwarp direction and 15% in weft direction, the totaldecreaJe from grey stage being 33.7 and 32.5% in warpand weft directions respectively (Table 1).This is due tothe reduction in the ratio flf., which, in turn, is theresult of decrease in single-thread strength andincrease in yarn pull-out force after viscose-dyeing.The re~son for this is that the viscose-dyeing involvesthe treatment of the cloth with vat dyes, caustic sodaand sodium hydrosulphite at about 80-85°C for 45-60Imin. This drastic treatment involving the highconcentration of alkali causes the strength loss andmakes the surface of yarns rough because of the partialdissolution of viscose, resulting in higher pull-outforce.

Effeqt of singeing-The data given in Table 1 alsoshow that after singeing there is no significant changein the tearing strength of cloth as well as in otherpropertlies of the fabric. The singeing process consistsin burning out all the fibre ends that may be protrudingfrom the fabric surface, which, in turn, helps ineliminating the hairy appearance of fabric. Thenegligible change in the tearing strength of cloth after

110

singeing is due to the fact that the process is carried outin such a way that its action is restricted to protrudingfibres and that it in no way affects the other fabriccharacteristics.

Effect of finishing-Table 1 shows that afterfinishing, the warp and weft tearing strengths increaseby about 50% over that at the end of previous process.When compared with the strength at grey stage thefinished fabric shows a decrease of 4.4% in the warpdirection and an increase of 1.62% in the weftdirection. The ratio fils also increased to almost twicethat of its previous value in singed stage. This is mainlybecause of 40-45% decrease in yarn withdrawal forceand also a slight increase in single-thread strength. Thedecrease in yarn withdrawal force is the result offinishing the fabric with 20% silicone finish, essentiallya softening agent which also imparts water repellencyto the cloth. The finish makes the surface of the fabric

smoother. The increase in single-thread strength afterfinishing is due to the deposition of silicone finish in theform of a film on the surface of yarn.

Conclusions

(I) Increase in single-thread strength (f) for the set ofthreads being ruptured is accompanied by increase intearing strength.

(2) Total crimp in the fabric has negative correlationwith fabric tearing strength.

(3) The tearing strength of fabric increases withincrease in the extensibility of crossing yarns.

(4) The fabric tear strength decreases with increasein yarn pull-out force ifJ for the opposite set ofthreads.

(5) The ratio fils and the tearing strength of clothhave a linear relationship.

(6) Tint washing has no significant effect on thetearing strength of the fabric.

(7) Scouring reduces the tearing strength of fabric.(8) The loss in tearing strength is expected after

heat-setting, but this loss is compensated for by anincrease in the extensibility of yarn, which dependsupon the overfeed allowed.

(9) There is a significant decrease in tearing strengthafter polyester-dyeing.

(10) Tearing strength decreases considerably aftervat-dyeing.

(II) Singeing has no significant effect on the tearingstrength of fabric.

(12) Finishing of fabric with a softener increases itstearing strength considerably.

AcknowledgementThe authors are grateful to Prof. R.C.D. Kaushik,

Director, TIT, Bhiwani, for permission to publish thispaper.

(.'"-

'.

Page 6: Effect of Wet Processing on the Tearing Strength of …nopr.niscair.res.in/bitstream/123456789/32992/1/IJFTR 9(3... · 2016. 7. 20. · later with cold water, and dried on a pin stenter

SHARMA et at.: EFFECT OF WET PROCESSING ON TEARING STRENGTH OF BLENDED FABRICS

References

1 Huebner J, J Text Inst, 12 (1921) 162.2 Huebner J, J Soc Dyers C%ur, 38 (1922) 29.

3 B.S. Handbook No. 11 (British Standards Institution, London)1974.

4 Adhikari D, A study of different tearing test methods, M. Tel\tthesis, M.D. University; Rohtak, 1983.

5 O'Brien W E & Weiner L I, Text Res 1,24 (1954) 241.6 Taylor H M, J Text Inst, 50(1959) T-161.7 Backer S & Tanenhaus, Text Res J, 21 (1951) 635.8 Williams S, Text Inds, 117 (1953) 134.

9 Harrison P W, J Text Inst, 51 (1960) T-91.10 Shenai V A & Lokre D B, Text Dyers Printers, 11 (1978) 27.11 Marvin D N, J Soc Dyers Colour, 70 (1954) 16.

III


Recommended