Effect of Wireless Power Link Load Resistance onthe Efficiency of the Energy Transfer
Mariusz Bojarski, Erdem Asa, Dariusz CzarkowskiNYU Polytechnic School of Engineering
Brooklyn, New York, USA
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Abstract—With the proper impedance matching system, a highefficiency can be acquired in wireless power transfer applications.Variations of the coupling coefficient factor could deviate, how-ever, the impedance matching system from the designed consider-ations. In this paper, the transmitter reflected impedance from thereceiver side is analyzed to avoid divergence of the impedancematching network considering a wide air gap range betweentransmitter and receiver sides. A 2 kW contactless system isdesigned to investigate an optimum impedance requirement bytesting several displacement gaps between coils. Experimental re-sults are demonstrated to reveal a relation between the efficiencyand the reflected impedance.
I. INTRODUCTION
Contactless energy transfer has experienced recently a grow-
ing attention for its numerous potential applications such as
smartphone charging platforms [1]-[2], medical implant de-
vices [3]-[4], and an electric vehicle charging [5]-[6]. Starting
from the transmitter side and ending at the receiver side,
the contactless energy transfer system must be well designed
and organized in order to acquire high efficiency [7]-[8]. An
impedance matching network is important to improve the
system performance and is usually used at both transmitter
and receiver sides. However, due to the coupling coefficient
variation, the contactless system overall impedance diverges
from the designed characteristic, which means that the de-
signed impedance matching may be not working effectively
causing a decrease in the system efficiency as compared to
the designed performance values.
Fig. 1. A general wireless power transfer system block diagram.
A conventional wireless energy transfer system is demon-
strated in Fig. 1. As seen in the figure, the system consists
of two main stages: the transmitter and receiver platforms.
The role of the first stage with impedance matching network
is to deliver energy to the second stage. The dc output
voltage is provided to the load by the second stage with an
impedance matching network, a high-frequency rectifier, and
a non-isolated dc/dc converter.
Power management, system controller synthesis, and cir-
cuit topologies are explored in the literature [9]-[13]. Self-
tuning power regulator [14], implicit adaptive controller [15],
directional tuning control [16], and more flexible solution,
active tuning of parallel compensated receiver with tri-state
boost converter topology [17] are submitted for wireless power
transfer applications. Using a buck converter in the receiver
side, GaN based transmitter with adaptive receiver is designed
in [18]. A boost converter topology with low switching fre-
quency is demonstrated in [19]. In [20]-[22], researchers have
investigated reflected power to the transmitter side for low
power inductive power transfer applications by using cascaded
boost and buck, buck-boost, and integrated buck and boost
converter, respectively. Optimal resonant load transformation
for the biomedical implants is proposed in [23]. However, there
is no paper considering the high power applications.
In this paper, wireless power link load influences on the
impedance which are seen by the inverter are investigated by
variable load in the receiver side. In order to reveal the system
efficiency improvement, the system is tested with several
distance variation between coils. Especially for high power
applications such as EV chargers, the reflected impedance
consideration brings a solution for EMI problems that can
be minimized providing transmitter side control at constant
frequency and regulating the output with phase shift or dc
link control. The converter model controllability is also tested
deriving the circuit behavior and transfer function of the
converter extracted for the reflected impedance approach. The
system performance is confirmed with experimental results
designing a wireless power transfer system at 2 kW in the
laboratory conditions. A related theoretical analysis with ver-
ification of the converter is discussed more detailed in the
following chapters.
II. ANALYSIS OF THE WIRELESS POWER LINK
A. Electrical Model
In order to perform an theoretical analysis a proper electrical
model of the circuit is required. The wireless power link can
be represented as two coupled inductors and two resonant
capacitors connected in series. The schematic of the circuit
model is shown in Fig. 2.
In this model VI is an ac voltage source, RL is a load
resistance, LP and LS are two coupled inductors with series
resistances RS and RP . K is a coupling factor between the9781-4799-6075-0/14/$31.00 c©2014 IEEE
Fig. 2. Schematic of the wireless power link connected to the AC source andresistive load.
two coils. CP and CS are resonant capacitors. The two coupled
inductors can be equivalently modeled as a transformer with
proper leakage and magnetizing inductances. To simplify
analysis both coils LP and LS are assumed to be identical and
equal to L. Then the model can be equivalently represented
by the circuit shown in Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. Equivalent circuit of the wireless power link with two identical coilsconnected to the AC source and resistive load.
In this model VI is an ac voltage source, RL is a load
resistance, LL and LM are leakage and magnetizing in-
ductances related with coupled inductors, RS and RP are
series resistances of the coils, and CP and CS are resonant
capacitors. This model is related to the model from Fig. 2 with
the following equations.
LM = K√
LPLS = KL,
LL = L− LM = (1−K)L, (1)
For the analysis purpose model can be simplified and
generalized as shown in Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. Generalized circuit of the wireless power link with two identical coilsconnected to the AC source and resistive load.
The generalized circuit model is more compact and it
simplifies derivation of the equations. Impedances in the model
are
ZP =1
jωCP
+RP + jωLL,
ZS =1
jωCS
+RS + jωLL,
ZM = jωLM . (2)
B. Circuit Analysis
The wireless power link analysis is performed based on the
circuit shown in Fig. 4. It is assumed that the circuit is loaded
with a pure resistance RL. As the first step of the analysis,
the voltage across the impedance ZM is calculated.
VZM =V[ZM||(ZS +RL)]
ZM||(ZS +RL) + ZP
=
=V(ZMZS + ZSRL)
ZMZS + ZMRL + ZMZP + ZSZP + ZSRL
(3)
Then, the voltage across the load resistance RL is calculated
as
VRL =VZMRL
ZS +RL
=
=VZMRL
ZMZS + ZMRL + ZMZP + ZSZP + ZSRL
(4)
The secondary side current, which is same as the load
current is equal to
IS =VRL
RL
=
=VZM
ZMZS + ZMRL + ZMZP + ZSZP + ZSRL
(5)
In order to calculate the primary side current, which is same
as the voltage source current, the impedance ZT seen by the
source is calculated.
ZT = ZP +ZMZS + ZMRL
ZM + ZS +RL
=
=ZMZS + ZMRL + ZMZP + ZSZP + ZPRL
ZM + ZS +RL
(6)
Then, the primary side current can be calculated as
IP =V
ZT
=
=V(ZM + ZS +RL)
ZMZS + ZMRL + ZMZP + ZSZP + ZPRL
(7)
The primary and the secondary currents ratio is
IP
IS=
ZM + ZS +RL
ZM
(8)
Losses in the circuit can be calculated based on the currents.
The losses are related to the real parts of the impedances
ZP and ZS , which are RP and RS . It can be seen that
these impedances can also include additional components, for
instance lead cables, which makes this analysis more general.
The circuit losses are calculated using the following equation.
Ploss = |IP|2RP + |IS|
2RS (9)
In order to calculate the efficiency of the circuit, equations
for the losses and the output power are needed. The output
power can be calculated based on the secondary side current
as
Po = |IS|2RL (10)
Then, the efficiency can be calculated using the following
equation.
η =Po
Po + Ploss=
1
1 + RS
RL+ RP |ZM+ZS+RL|2
RL|ZM|2
(11)
From the above equation it can be concluded that the effi-
ciency does not depend on an imaginary part of the impedance
ZP , which represents the leakage inductance of the primary
side. Secondly, the equation shows that low values of the
magnetizing inductance impedance ZM and large values of
the secondary side leakage impedance ZS may lead to a poor
efficiency.
It can be derived, that maximum efficiency is obtained at
the resonant frequency of the secondary side of the wireless
power link. Then ZM + ZS = RS , and equation (11) can be
rewritten as
η =Po
Po + Ploss=
1
1 + RS
RL+ RP |RS+RL|2
RL|ZM|2
(12)
When RL >> RS , which is usually the case, efficiency can
be approximated as
η =Po
Po + Ploss=
1
1 + RS
RL+ RPRL
|ZM|2
(13)
The maximum of above equation is obtained when function
f(RL) =RS
RL
+RPRL
|ZM|2(14)
is minimized. Derivative of above-mentioned function f(RL)is
df
dRL
=−RS
R2L
+RP
|ZM|2(15)
In can be derived that the maximum is obtained when
RS
R2L
=RP
|ZM|2
RL =
√
RS |ZM|2
RP
(16)
If RS = RP it can be reduced to
RL = |ZM| = ωKL (17)
The obtained optimum load resistance point is related to
the wireless power link primary and secondary current ratio
through the equation (8). As mentioned, at the resonance
frequency ZM + ZS = RS . As RS << RL the current ratio
for optimum load resistance can be simplified to
IP
IS=
RL
ZM
(18)
The above equation introduces the straightforward method
of verifying optimum load conditions of the wireless power
link.
III. SIMULATION RESULTS
Analytical results are verified with AC simulations. Circuit
model shown in Fig. 2 is used for simulations with parameters
shown in Table I.
TABLE ISIMULATION PARAMETERS
Parameter Value Unit Parameter Value Unit
f 145 kHz LP 30 µH
VI 200 V LS 30 µH
CP 40 nF RS 100 mΩ
CS 40 nF RP 100 mΩ
Simulation results are shown in Fig. 5 through Fig. 11.
Fig. 5 shows the efficiency of the wireless power link as
a function of the load resistance RL. It clearly shows that
operating at high or low load resistance results with poor
efficiency, especially at low values of coupling factor. The
optimum load resistance points were calculated using equation
(17) and marked on the plot. It can be observed that theoretical
predictions are in agreement with the simulation results.
Fig. 5. Wireless power link efficiency vs load resistance for various values ofcoupling factor. Optimum load resistance points are marked with ’X’ symbols.
On the next plot, shown in Fig. 6, the wireless power
link primary and secondary current ratio is presented. The
current ratios for optimum load resistances were calculated
using equation (18) and market on the plot. It can be seen
that it is consistent with the previous plot shown in Fig. 5.
Fig. 7 shows the optimum load resistance of the wireless
power link as a function of the coupling factor. It can be seen
that results are in perfect agreement with an analytical equation
(17).
The next two plots are shown for two cases, the optimum
adjustable resistance, and fixed value to optimum for a lowest
coupling factor. Fig. 8 shows the efficiency of the wireless
Fig. 6. Wireless power link primary and secondary current ratio vs loadresistance for various values of coupling factor. Optimum load resistancepoints are marked with ’X’ symbols.
Fig. 7. Wireless power link optimum load resistance vs coupling factor.
power link as a function of the coupling factor. Fig. 9 shows
the output power of the wireless power link as a function of the
coupling factor. It can be seen that adjusting load resistance
is increasing efficiency and decreasing power variations over
the changes of the coupling factor.
Fig. 8. Wireless power link efficiency vs coupling factor for optimum loadresistances.
In the next step, the influence of the series resistances
of wireless power link model (RP and RS) is investigated.
For that purpose the primary side series resistance RP is
reduced to 25 mΩ. Then, the optimum load resistance point
is calculated using equation (11) and related current ratio is
Fig. 9. Wireless power link output power vs coupling factor for optimumload resistances.
calculated using equation (18). The theoretical prediction is
then verified with simulation and the results are presented in
Fig. 10 and Fig. 11.
Fig. 10. Wireless power link efficiency vs load resistance for various values ofcoupling factor. Optimum load resistance points are marked with ’X’ symbols.For RP = 25 mΩ.
Fig. 11. Wireless power link primary and secondary current ratio vs loadresistance for various values of coupling factor. Optimum load resistancepoints are marked with ’X’ symbols. For RP = 25 mΩ.
IV. EXPERIMENTS
To confirm the performance of the system and correctness
of theoretical analysis, experimental results are provided. The
setup used for experiments is shown in Fig. 12.
Fig. 12. Experimental setup block diagram.
Fig. 13. Wireless power link used for experiment setup for 12 inches distancebetween coils.
Both of the used coils has dimensions 2.5 by 2.5 feet and
4 turns. In the experiments, setups with various distances
were used. The coupling factor was measured as described in
[24]. The summary of distances and related coupling factors
between the coils are presented in Table II. The wireless power
link setup is presented in Fig. 13.
TABLE IICOUPLING COEFFICIENTS
d [inches] VP [V] VS [V] K
4 6.12 1.39 0.227
6 6.08 1.05 0.173
8 6.16 0.832 0.135
10 6.08 0.616 0.101
12 6.08 0.500 0.082
The VP and VS values presented in the table are peak-to-peak
voltage measurements performed on primary and secondary
side coils in order to obtain coupling factor values.
The wireless power link consist of the two above-mentioned
coils and two resonant capacitors. The summary of the wireless
power link parameters is presented in Table III.
A full-bridge current driven Class D circuit is used as the
rectifier. Thus, the load resistance RL seen by the wireless
power link is
TABLE IIIWIRELESS POWER LINK PARAMETERS
Parameter Value Unit Parameter Value Unit
LP 24.9 µH rLP 45 mΩ
CP 41.1 nF rCP 4.5 mΩ
LS 25.6 µH rLS 47 mΩ
CS 41.3 nF rCS 3.5 mΩ
RL = 0.81RLDC (19)
The rectifier is built using four DSEI2X101-06A diodes. The
series resistance Rd introduced by the rectifier is calculated as
follows
Rd =1.4 V
Idc+ 9.4 mΩ (20)
where Idc is the output dc current through the load resistance
RLDC . The values used in the equation are based on the used
diode datasheet and are representing two diodes connected in
series.
As an inverter, a 2 kW two phase resonant inverter with a
common resonant circuit is used [25]. The operating frequency
is chosen to be 151.5 kHz, which is slightly above the resonant
frequency.
Fig. 14 and Fig. 15 show the efficiency and output power
characteristics with variable load and various distances be-
tween coils. On the plots the calculated optimum load resis-
tance points are marked. Those values were calculated using
equation (16), where RS = 60 mΩ, and RS = Rd + 100 mΩto include series resistances of the rectifier, inverter, and
connecting cables.
Fig. 14. Wireless power link efficiency vs load resistance for various distancesbetween coils. The actual measurement point are marked with ”x” symbols.The calculated optimum load resistance points are marked with ”o” symbols.
From the plot in Fig. 14, it can be seen that efficiency
decreases when the distance D between the wireless power
link coils increases. The plot also shows, that theoretical
prediction of the optimum load resistance is close to the
measured one, which verify correctness of the theoretical
analysis. It can be also concluded, that proper selection of load
resistance is especially important when the coupling factor has
a low value, because then the efficiency is dropping fast with
a load variation.
Fig. 15. Wireless power output power vs load resistance for various distancesbetween coils. The actual measurement point are marked with ”x” symbols.The calculated optimum load resistance points are marked with ”o” symbols.
From the plot in Fig. 15, it can be seen that the system
output power is rising with the load increment linearly.
The extracted optimum load resistance is plotted in Fig. 16.
As seen in the figure, the optimum resistance does not change
much between 6” and 8” inches. It is related to the variable
resistance step in the experiment, which was around 3 Ω.
Fig. 16. Wireless power link optimum load resistance vs distances betweencoils. The actual measurement point are marked with ”x” symbols.
The comparison of the optimum load and the constant
load at 4.9 Ω is given for efficiency and power analysis in
Fig. 17 and Fig. 18. As predicted from theoretical analysis,
the optimum load gives higher efficiency and lower power
variation for wide range of distances between the coils.
V. CONCLUSIONS
In this study, the load resistance effects on the efficiency of
the wireless power transfer are examined. The experimental
results are established with a variable load for various air
gap distances. The possible system efficiency improvement is
revealed in these circumstances. Considering the importance
of the efficiency in high power applications, the impedance
matching disturbance can be preventable with the proper load
and a careful design of the wireless power link. The converter
model is presented and analyzed. The theoretical results are
Fig. 17. Wireless power link efficiency vs distances between coils foroptimum load resistances. The actual measurement point are marked with”x” symbols.
Fig. 18. Wireless power link output power vs distances between coils foroptimum load resistances. The actual measurement point are marked with”x” symbols.
in good agreement with the simulation and the experimental
results. Laboratory prototype of a 2 kW wireless power
transfer system shows that the total efficiency can be improved
by up to 8% compared to the constant load application.
REFERENCES
[1] Y. Jang and M. M. Jovanovic, ”A Contactless Electrical Energy Transmis-sion System for Portable Telephone Battery Chargers,” IEEE Transactions
on Industrial Electronics, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 520–527, Jun. 2003.
[2] K. C. Wan, Q. Xue, X. Liu, and S. Y. Hui, ”Passive Radio FrequencyRepeater for Enhancing Signal Reception and Transmission in a WirelessCharging Platform,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 61,no. 4, pp. 1750–1757, Apr. 2014.
[3] A. K. RamRakhyani and G. Lazzi, ”On the Design of Efficient MultiCoil Telemetry System for Biomedical Implants,” IEEE Transactions on
Biomedical Circuits and Systems, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 11–23, Feb. 2013.
[4] M. Q. Nguyen, Z. Hughes, P. Woods, Y. S. Seo; S. Rao, and J. C. Chiao,”Field Distribution Models of Spiral Coil for Misalignment Analysis inWireless Power Transfer Systems,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave
Theory and Techniques, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 920–930, Apr. 2014.
[5] U. K. Madawala, M. Neath, and D. J. Thrimawithana, ”A Power Fre-quency Controller for Bidirectional Inductive Power Transfer Systems,”IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 310–317,Jan. 2013.
[6] F. Musavi and W. Eberle, ”Overview of Wireless Power Transfer Tech-nologies for Electric Vehicle Battery Charging,” IET Power Electronics,vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 60–66, Jan. 2014.
[7] W. Zhang, S. C. Wong, C. K. Tse, and Q. Chen, ”Design for EfficiencyOptimization and Voltage Controllability of Series Series CompensatedInductive Power Transfer Systems,” IEEE Transactions on Power Elec-
tronics, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 191–200, Jan. 2014.[8] C. Florian, F. Mastri, R. P. Paganelli, D. Masotti, and A. Costanzo, ”The-
oretical and Numerical Design of a Wireless Power Transmission LinkWith GaN Based Transmitter and Adaptive Receiver,” IEEE Transactions
on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol.62, no.4, pp. 931–946, Apr.2014.
[9] L. Chen, J. Boys, and G. Covic, ”Power Management for Multiple-pickup IPT Systems in Materials Handling Applications,” IEEE Journal
of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics, in press.[10] A. K. Swain, S. Devarakonda, and U. K. Madawala, ”Modeling, Sen-
sitivity Analysis, and Controller Synthesis of Multipickup BidirectionalInductive Power Transfer Systems,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial
Informatics, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1372–1380, May 2014.[11] C. Park, S. Lee, G. H. Cho, S. Y. Choi, and C. T. Rim, ”Two-
Dimensional Inductive Power Transfer System for Mobile Robots UsingEvenly Displaced Multiple Pickups,” IEEE Transactions on Industry
Applications, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 558–565, Feb. 2014.[12] C. Liu, A. P. Hu, B. Wang, and N. C. Nair, ”A Capacitively Coupled
Contactless Matrix Charging Platform With Soft Switched TransformerControl,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 60, no. 1, pp.249–260, Jan. 2013.
[13] J. E. James, D. R. Robertson, and G. A. Covic, ”Improved AC Pickupsfor IPT Systems,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 29, no.12, pp. 6361–6374, Dec. 2014.
[14] G. A. Covic, J. T. Boys, A. M. W. Tam, and J. C. H. Peng, ”SelfTuning Pick-ups for Inductive Power Transfer,” IEEE Power Electronics
Specialists Conference (PESC), pp. 3489–3494, Jun. 2008.[15] J. U. W. Hsu, A. Swain, and A. P. Hu, ”Implicit adaptive controller for
wireless power pickups,” IEEE Industrial Electronics and Applications
(ICIEA), pp. 514–519, Jun. 2011.[16] J. U. W. Hsu, A. P. Hu, and A. Swain, ”A Wireless Power Pickup Based
on Directional Tuning Control of Magnetic Amplifier,” IEEE Transactions
on Industrial Electronics, vol. 56, no. 7, pp. 2771–2781, Jul. 2009.
[17] Z. Pantic and S. M. Lukic, ”Framework and Topology for Active Tuningof Parallel Compensated Receivers in Power Transfer Systems,” IEEE
Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 4503–4513, Nov.2012.
[18] C. Florian, F. Mastri, R. P. Paganelli, D. Masotti, and A. Costanzo, ”The-oretical and Numerical Design of a Wireless Power Transmission LinkWith GaN-Based Transmitter and Adaptive Receiver,” IEEE Transactions
on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 931–946, Apr.2014.
[19] H. Jiang, B. Lariviere, D. Lan, J. Zhang, J. Wang, R. Fechter, M.Harrison, and S. Roy, ”A Low Switching Frequency AC-DC BoostConverter for Wireless Powered Miniaturized Implants,” IEEE Topical
Conference on Biomedical Wireless Technologies, Networks, and Sensing
Systems, pp. 40–42, Jan. 2014.[20] M. Fu, C. Ma, and X. Zhu, ”A Cascaded Boost-Buck Converter for
High Efficiency Wireless Power Transfer Systems,” IEEE Transactions
on Industrial Informatics, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 1972–1980, Aug. 2014.[21] Y. Huang, N. Shinohara, and T. Mitani, ”A Constant Efficiency of
Rectifying Circuit in an Extremely Wide Load Range,” IEEE Transactions
on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 986–993, Apr.2014.
[22] D. Ahn and S. Hong, ”Wireless Power Transfer Resonance CouplingAmplification by Load-Modulation Switching Controller,” IEEE Trans-
actions on Industrial Electronics, in press.[23] R. F. Xue, K. W. Cheng, and M. Je, ”High Efficiency Wireless Power
Transfer for Biomedical Implants by Optimal Resonant Load Transfor-mation,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers,vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 867–874, Apr. 2013.
[24] Lukas Heinzle, ”Measuring the Mutual Interaction between CoaxialCylindrical Coils with the Bode 100,” Smart Measurement Solution,
OMICRON LAB, 2013.[25] M. Bojarski, D. Czarkowski, F. de Leon, Q. Deng, M. K. Kazimierczuk,
and H. Sekiya, ”Multiphase resonant inverters with common resonantcircuit,” in Proc. IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems
(ISCAS), 2014, pp. 2445–2448.