Effects of Biochars on ecotoxicological indicators
Biochar Code Feedstocks Production
Scale
Pyrolysis
Temperature
BC1 R1501017 PmW-BC Poultry manure and wood Pilot 500
BC2 R1502004 D1-BC Digestate of corn and rye Pilot 500
BC3 R1504035 D2-BC Digestate from a biogas plant Industrial 700
BC4 R1504036 W1-BC Forestry Residues Industrial 650
BC5 R1505058 W2-BC Forestry Residues Pilot 500
BC6 R1505059 WC-BCX Vegetable and forestry wastes; refuse
compost
Pilot 500
BC7 R1505060 D3-BC Digestate from a biogas plant Pilot 500
BC8 R1505061 Pig-BC Pig manure Pilot 500
Biochars characteristics
Feedstock and origins:
Ecotoxicological risk assessment
Ecotoxicological risk assessment
Potential Toxic Elements and Organic Pollutants
Potential Toxic Elements (PTE) • Heavy metals present in feedstocks are not destroyed by pyrolysis
Arsenic (As), Cadmium (Cd), Chromium (Cr), Copper (Cu), Mercury (Hg), Molybdenum (Mo), Nickel (Ni), Lead (Pb), Selenium (Se), Zinc (Zn)
Potential Organic Pollutants (POP): • Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) : present in feedstock • Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and Dioxins and furans (PCDDs and
PCDFs) : produced during pyrolisis
Potential Toxic Elements - Contents
As, Hg, Se: for all biochars, below the LOQ (Limit of Quantification) Others heavy metals : levels are low One biochar stood out from the others : Pig-BC
Pig manure generally contains various heavy metals such as copper and zinc
Parameter Biochar
Arsenic As mg/kg dry wt < 4,07 < 4,05 < 4 < 4,06 < 4 < 4 < 4,04 < 4
Cadmium Cd mg/kg dry wt 0,7 < 0,2 0,2 < 0,2 0,2 0,5 0,89 0,8
Chromium Cr mg/kg dry wt 26,7 18,2 20,3 17,2 4,5 30,4 20 21,7
Copper Cu mg/kg dry wt 93 92,7 96 13,2 14,7 48,3 164 894,2
Mercury Hg mg/kg dry wt < 0,01 < 0,01 < 0,01 < 0,01 < 0,01 < 0,01 < 0,01 < 0,01
Molybdenum Mo mg/kg dry wt 5,56 3,96 4,66 1,93 < 0,4 2,7 5,11 10,85
Nickel Ni mg/kg dry wt 16,8 11,3 7,5 17,4 3,3 11,4 13 17,1
Lead Pb mg/kg dry wt 8,7 < 5,1 20,1 7,1 < 5 64,9 < 5 6,5
Selenium Se mg/kg dry wt < 3,06 < 3,04 < 1,5 < 3,04 < 1,5 < 1,5 < 3,03 1,7
Zinc Zn mg/kg dry wt 413,8 494,1 360,3 177,8 215,9 222,1 971,5 1475,8
D3-BC Pig-BCD1-BC PmW-BCD2-BC W1-BC W2-BC WC-BCX
Potential Toxic Elements - Contents
Comparison with limits defined by 3 guidelines and 1 french regulation All the biochars are below these limits
International Biochar Initiative (IBI) Standards V2 : http://www.biochar-international.org/sites/default/files/IBI_Biochar_Standards_V2%200_final_2014.pdf European Biochar Certificate (EBC) Guidelines V6.1 : http://www.european-biochar.org/biochar/media/doc/ebc-guidelines.pdf Biochar Quality Mandate (BQM) Version for public consultation V1.0 : http://www.geos.ed.ac.uk/homes/sshackle/BQM.pdf Arrêté du 8 janvier 1998 fixant les prescriptions techniques applicables aux épandages de boues : http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichTexte.do?cidTexte=JORFTEXT000000570287
Parameter GuidelinesInternational Biochar
Initiative (IBI)
European Biochar
Certificate (EBC)
Biochar Quality
Mandate (BQM)
Arrêté 8 janvier 1998
Epandage boues STEP
Arsenic As mg/kg dry wt 12-100 - 10-100 -
Cadmium Cd mg/kg dry wt 1,4-39 < 1-1,5 3-39 10
Chromium Cr mg/kg dry wt 64-1200 < 80-90 15-100 1000
Copper Cu mg/kg dry wt 63-1500 < 100 40-1500 1000
Mercury Hg mg/kg dry wt 1-17 < 1 1-17 10
Molybdenum Mo mg/kg dry wt 5-20 - 10-75 -
Nickel Ni mg/kg dry wt 47-600 < 30-50 10-600 200
Lead Pb mg/kg dry wt 70-500 < 120-150 60-500 800
Selenium Se mg/kg dry wt 2-36 - 5-100 -
Zinc Zn mg/kg dry wt 200-7000 < 400 150-2800 3000
Potential Toxic Elements - Fluxes
Fluxes of heavy metals for a application dose of 5 tons dw/ha
1) Comparison with limits defined by french regulation for the fertilizers registration
All the biochars are below except Pig-BC for copper and zinc
( CuFlux= 4471 g/ha > MaxFlux = 1000 g/ha ; ZnFlux= 7380g/ha > MaxFlux = 3000g/ha)
2) Ecotoxicological risk assessment characterized by Risk Characterization Ratio (RCR)
RCR << 1 for all heavy metals in Biochars
PEC
PNEC RCR =
Predicted Environmental Concentration Concentration of the toxicant that might be expected to be found in an ecosystem
Calculated value (flux)
Predicted No Effect Concentration Concentration of the toxicant below wich adverse effects are unlikely to occur
Estimated value (toxicity data) RCR < 1 : No risk RCR >> 2 : Confirmed risk
Potential Organic PollutantsParameter Biochar
Congeners 28 mg/kg dry wt < 0,01 < 0,01 < 0,01 < 0,01 < 0,01 < 0,01 < 0,01 < 0,01
Congeners 52 mg/kg dry wt < 0,01 < 0,01 < 0,01 < 0,01 < 0,01 < 0,01 < 0,01 < 0,01
Congeners 101 mg/kg dry wt < 0,01 < 0,01 < 0,01 < 0,01 < 0,01 < 0,01 < 0,01 < 0,01
Congeners 118 mg/kg dry wt < 0,01 < 0,01 < 0,01 < 0,01 < 0,01 < 0,01 < 0,01 < 0,01
Congeners 138 mg/kg dry wt < 0,01 < 0,01 < 0,01 < 0,01 < 0,01 < 0,01 < 0,01 < 0,01
Congeners 153 mg/kg dry wt < 0,01 < 0,01 < 0,01 < 0,01 < 0,01 < 0,01 < 0,01 < 0,01
Congeners 180 mg/kg dry wt < 0,01 < 0,01 < 0,01 < 0,01 < 0,01 < 0,01 < 0,01 < 0,01
Sum of 7 PCB mg/kg dry wt < 0,07 < 0,07 < 0,07 < 0,07 < 0,07 < 0,07 < 0,07 < 0,07
Acenaphtene mg/kg dry wt 0,038 0,046 0,01 < 0,01 0,036 0,015 < 0,01 0,041
Acenaphtylene mg/kg dry wt < 0,01 < 0,01 0,01 < 0,01 < 0,01 < 0,01 0,01 0,012
Anthracene mg/kg dry wt 0,044 < 0,01 0,1 < 0,01 0,08 0,033 0,031 0,08
Benzo(a)anthracene mg/kg dry wt 0,013 < 0,01 0,049 < 0,01 0,026 0,018 0,017 0,039
Benzo(a)pyrene mg/kg dry wt < 0,01 < 0,01 0,032 < 0,01 0,015 0,019 0,024 0,053
Benzo(b)fluoranthène mg/kg dry wt < 0,01 < 0,01 0,024 < 0,01 < 0,01 < 0,01 0,012 0,021
Benzo(k)fluoranthène mg/kg dry wt < 0,01 < 0,01 0,019 < 0,01 < 0,01 < 0,01 < 0,01 0,012
Benzo(ghi)perylene mg/kg dry wt < 0,01 < 0,01 0,023 < 0,01 < 0,01 0,015 0,02 0,016
Chryseme mg/kg dry wt 0,018 < 0,01 0,06 < 0,01 0,026 0,019 0,03 0,13
Dibenzo(ah)anthrocene mg/kg dry wt < 0,01 < 0,01 0,033 < 0,01 < 0,01 < 0,01 < 0,01 < 0,01
Fluoranthene mg/kg dry wt 0,04 < 0,01 0,125 < 0,01 0,045 0,021 0,031 0,085
Fluorene mg/kg dry wt 0,076 < 0,01 0,13 < 0,01 0,15 0,08 0,067 0,15
Indeno(123CD)pyrene mg/kg dry wt < 0,01 < 0,01 < 0,01 < 0,01 < 0,01 < 0,01 0,013 < 0,01
Naphtalene mg/kg dry wt 0,198 0,32 0,31 0,041 0,32 0,1 0,254 0,35
Phenanthrene mg/kg dry wt 0,147 < 0,01 0,309 < 0,01 0,277 0,09 0,085 0,262
Pyrene mg/kg dry wt 0,04 < 0,01 0,14 < 0,01 0,086 0,033 0,037 0,099
Sum of 16 HAP mg/kg dry wt 0,649 0,436 1,379 0,116 1,091 0,468 0,646 1,36
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-Heptachlorodibenzodioxin ng/kg dry wt 0,1504 0,065 0,2 0,222 0,116 0,114 0,1342 0,0787
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-Heptachlorodibenzofuran ng/kg dry wt 0,1387 0,072 0,056 0,08 0,074 0,059 0,0471 0,0494
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-Heptachlorodibenzofuran ng/kg dry wt 0,0263 0,015 < 0,011 0,024 < 0,017 < 0,023 < 0,0098 0,0122
1,2,3,4,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzofuran ng/kg dry wt 0,0436 0,03 0,023 0,051 < 0,03 < 0,017 0,0244 0,0287
1,2,3,6,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzodioxin ng/kg dry wt 0,0389 < 0,01 < 0,022 < 0,028 < 0,055 < 0,045 0,0331 0,0133
1,2,3,6,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzofuran ng/kg dry wt 0,0334 0,019 < 0,013 0,033 < 0,03 < 0,017 0,0155 0,0106
1,2,3,7,8,9-Hexachlorodibenzodioxin ng/kg dry wt 0,0237 < 0,01 < 0,022 < 0,027 < 0,054 < 0,045 0,0663 0,0138
1,2,3,7,8,9-Hexachlorodibenzofuran ng/kg dry wt < 0,0133 < 0,008 < 0,015 < 0,027 < 0,032 < 0,02 < 0,0125 < 0,0047
2,3,4,6,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzofuran ng/kg dry wt 0,026 0,01 < 0,014 < 0,026 < 0,031 < 0,017 < 0,012 0,008
1,2,3,7,8-Pentachlorodibenzodioxin ng/kg dry wt 0,0176 0,014 0,03 0,051 < 0,03 < 0,026 0,0716 0,0184
1,2,3,7,8-Pentachlorodibenzofuran ng/kg dry wt 0,0277 0,019 0,015 < 0,032 < 0,023 0,016 0,017 0,023
2,3,4,6,7,8-Pentachlorodibenzofuran ng/kg dry wt 0,0318 0,028 0,027 0,06 0,035 0,022 0,0292 0,0308
1,2,3,4,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzodioxin ng/kg dry wt < 0,0114 < 0,01 < 0,022 < 0,026 < 0,052 < 0,043 < 0,0137 < 0,01
2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzodioxin ng/kg dry wt 0,0217 < 0,005 < 0,011 0,027 < 0,019 < 0,018 0,0502 0,0114
2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzofuran ng/kg dry wt 0,0489 0,035 0,041 0,063 0,051 0,033 0,0396 0,0799
Octachlorodibenzodioxin ng/kg dry wt 0,0483 0,195 0,463 0,885 0,535 0,231 0,3428 0,2255
Octachlorodibenzofuran ng/kg dry wt 0,1664 0,061 0,123 0,097 0,129 0,078 0,0601 0,0481
PCBs
PAHs
Dioxins
Furans
D3-BC Pig-BCD1-BC PmW-BCD2-BC W1-BC W2-BC WC-BCX
PCBs below the LOQ
Contents All the biochars are
below limits defined by 3 guidelines and 1 french regulation
Fluxes Below limits defined by french regulation
RCR < 2 for all POP in Biochars
Ecotoxicological risk assessment
Global approach - Soil improver
ISO 11-269-2 : Effects of contaminated soils on the emergence and early growth of higher plants
Biochars tested : D1-BC ; D2-BC ; PmW-BC Plant test : barley (Hordeum vulgare) and cress (Lepidium sativum) Application doses : 1 – 5 – 10 – 50 t dw/ha Emergence 7 days after seedling Dry weight 14 days after 70% emergence of the seedling in the control group Emergence and biomasses are compared to those of untreated control plants and percentage of inhibition are calculated Toxicity threshold : 25 % inhibition
Global approach - Soil improver
ISO 11-269-2 : Effects of contaminated soils on the emergence and early growth of higher plants
No negative impact at 1, 5 and 10 t/ha ; At 50 t/ha, only on cress emergence
Global approach - Soil improver
ISO 11-268-2 : Determination of effects on reproduction of Eisenia fetida/Eisenia andrei
Biochars tested : D1-BC ; D2-BC ; PmW-BC Test indicators : Eisenia fetida and Eisenia andrei Application doses : 1 – 5 – 10 – 50 t dw/ha Mortality and biomasses of adults eartworms 28 days after exposure Reproduction (numbers of juvenils) 56 days after exposure Biomasses and numbers of juvenils are compared to those of untreated control and expressed as inhibition percentage Toxicity threshold : 20 % inhibiton for biomasses 50 % inhibition for numbers of juvenils
Global approach - Soil improver
ISO 11-268-2 : Determination of effects on reproduction of Eisenia fetida/Eisenia andrei
% Mortality after 28 days Doses D1-BC D2-BC PmW-BC
Dose 1 0 0 0
Dose 5 0 0 0
Dose 10 0 0 0
Dose 50 0 3 0
Control 0 0 0
No negative impact at 1, 5, 10 and 50 t/ha
Global approach - Component growing media
ISO 11-269-2 : Effects of contaminated soils on the emergence and early growth of higher plants
Biochar tested : W1-BC Plant test : barley (Hordeum vulgare) and cress (Lepidium sativum) Application doses : 5 – 10 – 20 % (volum/volum) Emergence 7 days after seedling Dry weight 14 days after 70% emergence of the seedling in the control group Emergence and biomasses are compared to those of untreated control plants and percentage of inhibition are calculated Toxicity threshold : 25 % inhibition
ISO 11-269-2 : Effects of contaminated soils on the emergence and early growth of higher plants
No negative impact on emergence
Global approach - Component growing media
No negative impact on barley growth
Cress growth Dose 10% (v/v) : - 47% growth Dose 20% (v/v) : - 54% growth
ISO 11-268-2 : Determination of effects on reproduction of Eisenia fetida/Eisenia andrei
Biochars tested : D1-BC ; D2-BC ; W1-BC Test indicator : Eisenia fetida and Eisenia andrei Application doses : 5 – 10 – 20 % (volum/volum) Mortality and biomasses of adults eartworms 28 days after exposure Reproduction (numbers of juvenils) 56 days after exposure Biomasses and numbers of juvenils are compared to those of untreated control and expressed as inhibition percentage Toxicity threshold : 20 % inhibition for biomasses 50 % inhibition for numbers of juvenils
Global approach - Component growing media
ISO 11-268-2 : Determination of effects on reproduction of Eisenia fetida/Eisenia andrei
% Mortality after 28 days
Negative impact at all application doses - High mortality rate - Biomass loss - No reproduction
Global approach - Component growing media
Doses D1-BC D2-BC W1-BC
Dose 5% 100 23 0
Dose 10% 100 48 8
Dose 20% 100 100 50
Control 0 0 0
Ecotoxicological risk assessment
Leaching
Batch Leaching (EN ISO TS 21268-2 )
90g dw Biochar
900ml lixiviant (CaCl2 1mM)
24 hours agitation at 10 rpm
Liquid/Solid (L/S) Ratio = 10
Upward Leaching (EN ISO TS 21268-3 )
3,5 kg dw soil + 6g dw Biochar
(dose soil improver: 5 t dw/ha)
Lixiviant (CaCl2 1mM)
Upward flow = 49 ml/hours
L/S Ratio = 10
2,5 kg dw soil + 3,25g dw
Biochar (dose soil improver)
600 ml watering: rainfall
episode simulation 80mm
L/S Ratio = 0,25
Downward Leaching (Lysimetric essay)
Liquid/Solid Ratio L/kg Volume of eluate L
Eluate 1 0,1 ± 0,02 0,367
Eluate 2 0,1 ± 0,02 0,367
Eluate 3 0,3 ± 0,05 1,101
Eluate 4 0,5 ± 0,01 1,835
Eluate 5 1,0 ± 0,2 3,67
Eluate 6 3,0 ± 0,2 11,01
Eluate 7 5,0 ± 0,2 18,349
Potential Toxic Elements
1) Analysis of heavy metals concentration in aqueous extract Arsenic (As), Cadmium (Cd), Chromium (Cr), Copper (Cu), Mercury (Hg), Molybdenum (Mo), Nickel (Ni), Lead (Pb), Selenium (Se), Zinc (Zn)
2) Calculation of efficiency of extraction for each metals quantity biochar x heavy metal content x concentration 3) Evaluation of Predicted Environmental Concentration (PEC) in 2 compartments Infiltration of surface water in groundwater (50%) and in river (50%) 5 tons dw/ha x heavy metal content x efficiency of extraction Groundwater Daily flow : 540 m3 Annual flow : 197 100 m3
River Daily flow : 86 400 m3 Annual flow : 31 536 000 m3
Stormy episode during 24 hours Rain during 1 year 4) Calculation of Risk Characterization Ratio (RCR)
Potential Toxic Elements
Batch leaching 6 Biochars
PTE D1-BC D2-BC D3-BC W2-BC WC-BXC Pig-BC D1-BC D2-BC D3-BC W2-BC WC-BXC Pig-BC
As 0,0044 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Cd 0,00075 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000
Cr 0,0041 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000
Cu 0,0016 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,001 0,000 0,000 0,026
Hg 0,00024 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ni 0,0005 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,004 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,004
Pb 0,005 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000
Se 0,00088 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Zn 0,0086 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,001 0,000 0,001
Rain during 1 year
PNEC
mg/LRCR River RCR Groundwater
PTE D1-BC D2-BC D3-BC W2-BC WC-BXC Pig-BC D1-BC D2-BC D3-BC W2-BC WC-BXC Pig-BC
As 0,0044 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Cd 0,00075 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,075 0,044 0,022 0,022 0,022 0,022
Cr 0,0041 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,068 0,022 0,008 0,003 0,029 0,008
Cu 0,0016 0,001 0,000 0,002 0,001 0,001 0,060 0,122 0,031 0,278 0,148 0,081 9,549
Hg 0,00024 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ni 0,0005 0,009 0,001 0,001 0,001 0,001 0,009 1,481 0,093 0,093 0,093 0,093 1,389
Pb 0,005 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,030 0,005 0,002 0,005 0,002 0,002
Se 0,00088 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Zn 0,0086 0,000 0,001 0,000 0,003 0,000 0,002 0,027 0,108 0,013 0,431 0,065 0,323
Stormy episode during 24 hours
PNEC
mg/LRCR River RCR Groundwater
RCR > 2 for copper in Pig-BC Confirmed risk in the most critical scenario
Potential Toxic Elements
Upward leaching 2 Biochars (D1-BC, D2-BC) Downward leaching 1 Biochar (D1-BC), 2 leachings
PTE
D1-BC
Upward
Leaching
D1-BC
Downward
Leaching 1
D1-BC
Downward
Leaching 2
D2-BC
Upward
Leaching
D1-BC
Upward
Leaching
D1-BC
Downward
Leaching 1
D1-BC
Downward
Leaching 2
D2-BC
Upward
Leaching
As 0,0044 - 0,000 - - - 0,003 - -
Cd 0,00075 0,000 0,000 0,000 - 0,006 0,002 0,000 -
Cr 0,0041 0,000 0,000 0,000 - 0,002 0,000 0,000 -
Cu 0,0016 - 0,000 - - - 0,018 - -
Hg 0,00024 - 0,000 0,000 - - 0,002 0,000 -
Ni 0,0005 0,000 0,000 0,000 - 0,075 0,008 0,000 -
Pb 0,005 0,000 0,000 0,000 - 0,013 0,000 0,000 -
Se 0,00088 0,000 0,000 0,000 - 0,026 0,001 0,000 -
Zn 0,0086 - 0,000 0,000 - - 0,007 0,010 -
Rain during 1 year
PNEC
mg/L
RCR River RCR Groundwater
PTE
D1-BC
Upward
Leaching
D1-BC
Downward
Leaching 1
D1-BC
Downward
Leaching 2
D2-BC
Upward
Leaching
D1-BC
Upward
Leaching
D1-BC
Downward
Leaching 1
D1-BC
Downward
Leaching 2
D2-BC
Upward
Leaching
As 0,0044 - 0,006 - - - 1,034 - -
Cd 0,00075 0,014 0,005 0,000 - 2,242 0,728 0,014 -
Cr 0,0041 0,005 0,001 0,000 - 0,727 0,093 0,004 -
Cu 0,0016 - 0,041 - - - 6,603 - -
Hg 0,00024 - 0,004 0,000 - - 0,637 0,012 -
Ni 0,0005 0,171 0,019 0,000 - 27,307 3,058 0,059 -
Pb 0,005 0,029 0,000 0,000 - 4,614 0,076 0,001 -
Se 0,00088 0,060 0,003 0,000 - 9,541 0,434 0,008 -
Zn 0,0086 - 0,017 0,023 - - 2,667 3,740 -
Stormy episode during 24 hours
PNEC
mg/L
RCR River RCR Groundwater
Upward leaching L/S = 10
Downward leaching L/S = 0,25
RCR > 2 for several heavy metals
Confirmed risk in the most critical scenario
Ecotoxicological risk assessment
Global approach
ISO 8692 : Fresh water algal growth inhibition test with unicellular green algae
Aqueous extract by : - batch leaching (6 Biochars) - downward leaching (Mix Soil + 1 Biochar) - upward leaching (Mix Soil + 1 Biochar) Test indicator : Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata Tested doses : range of concentration of aqueous extract Growth 72 hours after exposure Growth are compared to those of untreated control and percentage of inhibition are calculated Toxicity threshold : 15 % inhibition
Global approach
ISO 6341: Determination of the inhibition of the mobility of Daphnia magna Straus
Aqueous extract by : - batch leaching (6 Biochars) - downward leaching (Mix Soil + 1 Biochar) - upward leaching (Mix Soil + 1 Biochar) Test indicator : Daphnia magna Straus Tested doses : range of concentration of aqueous extract Immobilization of D. magna after 24 and 48 hours exposure Immobilization are compared to those of untreated control and percentage of inhibition are calculated Toxicity threshold : 20 % inhibition
Global approach
Aqueous extract by batch leaching
Inhibition algae growth:
Pig-BC > D1-BC > WC-BCX > D3-BC > D2-BC > W2-BC
Inhibition daphnia mobility:
Pig-BC > D1-BC > D2-BC > D3-BC > WC-BCX > W2-BC
Global approach
Aqueous extract by downward leaching
Inhibition algae growth: No ecotoxicity for D1-BC leaching, soil leaching present more effect !
Inhibition daphnia mobility:
No ecotoxicity
Global approach
Aqueous extract by upward leaching
Inhibition daphnia mobility: No ecotoxicity
Inhibition algae growth:
No ecotoxicity for soil and mix soil + D1-BC
Conclusion
Terrestrial Risks - Particular attention should be given to heavy metals content in feedstocks - Use as soil improver :
No risks are identified on tested indicators at 5 and 10 tons dw/ha PTE : confirmed risk in the most critical scenario : « Terms of use » should be
defined - Use as growing media component : confirmed risk starts at dose 5 % (v/v)
Aquatic Risks - Particular attention should be given to heavy metals content in feedstocks - Confirmed risk in the most critical scenario : « Terms of use » should be defined - Aqueous extracts from batch leaching : confirmed effects are identified
Coloration of extract inhibits growth ? tests on other indicators? - Aqueous extracs from up/down leaching : no risks are identified on tested indicators
Biochars should not present an ecotoxic risk in defined usage
Thank you for your attention