© imec 2004
Effects of different processing conditions on line edge roughness for
193nm and 157nm resistsM. Erckena), L.H.A. Leunissena), I. Pollentiera),
G.P. Patsisb), V. Constantoudisb) and E. Gogolidesb)
a) IMEC, Kapeldreef 75, B-3001 Leuven, Belgiumb) Institute of Microelectronics (IMEL), NCSR
“Demokritos”, P.O. Box 60228, Aghia Paraskevi, Attiki, Greece 15310
© imec 2004 Monique Ercken - Effects of different processing conditions on LER 2
Outline
IntroductionOverview of experimental resultsConclusionsAcknowledgements
© imec 2004 Monique Ercken - Effects of different processing conditions on LER 3
Outline
Introductionn Classical definition of LER 3σn Inline versus offline LER analysisnMore complete LER description
Overview of experimental resultsConclusionsAcknowledgements
© imec 2004 Monique Ercken - Effects of different processing conditions on LER 4
Classical LER/LWR 3σ definition
δW(zi) is the deviationfrom the average
line edge δWN is number of measurements points
2/1
1
2
1
))((33
−
−×=
∑=
N
WzWN
ii δδ
σ
Line Edge Roughness
CD variation over certainline length = Line WidthRoughness
© imec 2004 Monique Ercken - Effects of different processing conditions on LER 5
Inline LER/LWR analysis
Standard SEM algorithms
LER/LWR measurements at n Fixed amount of effective
measurement positions n Changing measurement box length Lè Evaluation of full frequency spectrumn Sufficient averaging
A measurement procedure has been set up to give consistent results independent from the measurement tool (KLA8250XR or Hitachi9200S) used.
L
© imec 2004 Monique Ercken - Effects of different processing conditions on LER 6
0
5
10
15
0 1 2 3
Measurement box length L (um)
LWR
3si
gma
(nm
)
measurement tool 1
measurement tool 2
2-parameter model (IMEC)
experimental data
• LWR is increasing with increasing box length
Plateau value ?
Curvature ?
© imec 2004 Monique Ercken - Effects of different processing conditions on LER 7
0
5
10
15
0 1 2 3
Measurement box length L (um)
LWR
3si
gma
(nm
)
measurement tool 1
measurement tool 2
2-parameter model (IMEC)
( )[ ]2inf 2
)2exp(121)(
LWWLLW
L ccc −+−+−⋅= σσ
σinf = 11.3nmWc = 189nm(100nm poly line)0
5
10
15
0 1 2 3
Measurment box length L (um)
LWR
3si
gma
(nm
)
measurement tool 1
measurement tool 2
Theory
1st order autoregressive process
Plateau ð σinf
Curvature ð correlation length Wc
L.H.A. Leunissen et al., MNE 2003, to be published in Microelectronic Engineering
© imec 2004 Monique Ercken - Effects of different processing conditions on LER 8
Offline image analysis
Generation of top-down SEM images of desired feature“Demokritos” software detects all edges present and automatically generates
n an averaging on LER 3σ versus edge length from each edge (ðonly LER)
n a correlation length ξ from the final average height-height correlation function (HHCF)
n a roughness exponent α
The program runs as an executable under MATLAB.
Edge detection on pixel base
© imec 2004 Monique Ercken - Effects of different processing conditions on LER 9
3-parameter model (Demokritos)
1 10 100 10001
2
3
4
5
6
G(r
)
r(nm)
z(yi)
yi
height
G(r) is determined by:1. sigma value2. α : roughness exponent(relative contribution of high frequency fluctuations to roughness)3. ξ : correlation length(for r>ξ no height-height correlations)
rα
20.5sigma
[2(1-1/e)]0.5sigmaG(ξ)
ξ
spatial roughness: height-height correlation function
[ ]1/2N
1i
2ii )z(yr)z(y
N1
G(r)
−+= ∑
=
© imec 2004 Monique Ercken - Effects of different processing conditions on LER 10
More complete description
A more complete description of the LER can be obtained by measuring the full spatial frequency dependence of the roughness.
2-parameter model (IMEC, MNE’03) :n Classical LER/LWR 3σn Correlation length Wc
n Inline measurements on top-down SEM
3-parameter model (Demokritos) :n Classical LER 3σ
n Correlation length ξ : the distance after which the edge points can be considered uncorrelated and the edge looks flat
n Roughness exponent α : the relative contribution of high frequency fluctuations to LER
n Offline analysis of top-down SEM pictures
© imec 2004 Monique Ercken - Effects of different processing conditions on LER 11
Outline
IntroductionOverview of experimental results
1. Impact of changing SB and PEB temperature on LER (193nm & 157nm)
2. Impact of aerial image contrast (193nm)3. Introduction of a resist hardening step before the etch procedure
n Shallow trench isolation (STI) patterning for 193nmn Impact on 157nm resists
ConclusionsAcknowledgements
© imec 2004 Monique Ercken - Effects of different processing conditions on LER 12
Outline
IntroductionOverview of experimental results
1. Impact of changing SB and PEB temperature on LER (193nm & 157nm)
2. Impact of aerial image contrast (193nm)3. Introduction of a resist hardening step before the etch procedure
n Shallow trench isolation (STI) patterning for 193nm processingn Impact on 157nm resists
ConclusionsAcknowledgements
© imec 2004 Monique Ercken - Effects of different processing conditions on LER 13
110 115 120
110115
1204
6
8
LER
3si
gma
(nm
)
SB (C)PEB (C)
1. SB/PEB : impact on LER 3σ
193nm
Trends :• decreasing LER with decreasing SB• decreasing LER with increasing PEB
Offline analysis
100nm 1:1 L/S
85 9095
115120
1258
10
12
14
16
18
LER
3si
gma
(nm
)
SB (C)PEB (C)
157nm95nm IL
© imec 2004 Monique Ercken - Effects of different processing conditions on LER 14
110 115 120
110115
1204
6
8
LER
3si
gma
(nm
)
SB (C)PEB (C)
1. SB/PEB : correlation length ξ
193nm
Offline analysis
100nm 1:1 L/S
110 115120
110
115120
0
10
20
30
40
corr
elat
ion
leng
th (n
m)
SB (C)PEB (C)
ξ
© imec 2004 Monique Ercken - Effects of different processing conditions on LER 15
1. SB/PEB : roughness exponent α
193nm
Offline analysis
110 115120
110
115120
0
10
20
30
40
corr
elat
ion
leng
th (n
m)
SB (C)PEB (C)
ξ
110115120
110115
1200.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
roug
hnes
s ex
pone
nt
SB (C)PEB (C)
α
Trends :• ξ : decreasing with decreasing PEB and increasing SB• α : decreasing with decreasing SB and increasing PEB
© imec 2004 Monique Ercken - Effects of different processing conditions on LER 16
1. SB/PEB : discussion
Trends seen for LER 3σ and correlation length with changing SB and PEB are opposite to each other
n decreasing LER / increasing correlation length with decreasing SBn decreasing LER / increasing correlation length with increasing PEB
Correlation length is believed to be related to acid diffusion (ð increases with larger acid diffusion lengths)
n Increasing PEB temperature will enhance acid diffusion, resulting in a smoothening of the final edge (less LER)
n Decreasing SB temperature will result in more residual solvent in the polymer matrix ð enhances also acid diffusion ð more smoothening of the edge (less LER)
Trend for roughness exponent not yet understood (needs further investigation)
© imec 2004 Monique Ercken - Effects of different processing conditions on LER 17
3. Introduction of a resist hardening (RH) step prior to substrate etch
with resist hardeningwithout resist hardening
Top-down view STI patterning example (stack: Si/nitride/resist) after etch and resist strip
© imec 2004 Monique Ercken - Effects of different processing conditions on LER 18
3. Impact of the RH on STI profile
without resist hardening with resist hardening
Significant reduced sidewall roughness
Due to particular shape of STI profile ð only offline LER analysis
• LER 3σ analysis (offline)
0
2
4
6
8
10
Resist RH
LER 3
sigma
[nm] DR
ISO INVISO
no RH + etch
RH + etch
110nm
no RH + etch
RH + etch
150nm
DR : 120nm active area width / 160nm field width ISO : 120nm iso active area INVISO : 160nm iso field width
2 different nitride
© imec 2004 Monique Ercken - Effects of different processing conditions on LER 20
3. Verification with AFM
-800
-750
-700
-650
-600
-550
-500
-450
-400
-350
-3000 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Profile width (nm)
Pro
file
hei
gh
t (n
m)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
0 100 200 300 400 500
Depth from top (nm)
LER
3 (
nm)
AFM (no RH)
AFM (RH)
ISO structure, using 110nm nitridethickness
AFM scan
(with courtesy of Veeco)
Offline LER
approximate determinedoffline LER position
© imec 2004 Monique Ercken - Effects of different processing conditions on LER 21
Outline
IntroductionOverview of experimental resultsConclusionsAcknowledgements
© imec 2004 Monique Ercken - Effects of different processing conditions on LER 22
Conclusions
More complete characterization of LER including LER 3σ and correlation lengthGood agreement between inline and offline determined LER 3σ valueDemonstration and better understanding of parameters influencing LER
n SB and PEBn Aerial image contrastn Etch process
Definitely further improvement is needed3σ ~ 7.7nm
95nm 1:1 L/S
3σ ~ 9.1nm
e.g. impact of RHon 157nm resist
© imec 2004 Monique Ercken - Effects of different processing conditions on LER 23
Outline
IntroductionOverview of experimental resultsConclusionsAcknowledgements
© imec 2004 Monique Ercken - Effects of different processing conditions on LER 24
Thanks to …
Nadia Vandenbroeck, Christie Delvaux, Dieter Van Den Heuvel and Greet StormsDenis Shamiryan and Sabrina Locorotondo (IMEC etch)Johan Vertommen and Bart Coenegrachts (Lam Research, Leuven)Rita Rooyackers (IMEC integration)Ingo Schmitz (Veeco)European projects CRISPIES and UV2-LITHO
www.imec.beWorldwide collaboration with more than 500 companies and institutes.
IMEC – Kapeldreef 75 – B-3001 Leuven – Belgium – Tel. +32 16 281211 – Fax +32 16 229400 – www.imec.be