+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Effects of RAP-RAS in Mixes October 2011 · RAP 5.0 (0.75) 87 15.0 76.6 Combined Grade. Produced...

Effects of RAP-RAS in Mixes October 2011 · RAP 5.0 (0.75) 87 15.0 76.6 Combined Grade. Produced...

Date post: 30-Jun-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 1 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
27
Richard S. Williammee, Jr., MSCE, P.E. TxDOT Fort Worth District 2011 Transportation Short Course October 12, 2011
Transcript
Page 1: Effects of RAP-RAS in Mixes October 2011 · RAP 5.0 (0.75) 87 15.0 76.6 Combined Grade. Produced and Placed August 25 Photo taken August 26. Ways to mitigate RAP/RAS concerns: increase

Richard S. Williammee, Jr., MSCE, P.E.

TxDOT Fort Worth District

2011 Transportation Short Course                                                                October 12, 2011

Page 2: Effects of RAP-RAS in Mixes October 2011 · RAP 5.0 (0.75) 87 15.0 76.6 Combined Grade. Produced and Placed August 25 Photo taken August 26. Ways to mitigate RAP/RAS concerns: increase

RASRAP RASRAP

Page 3: Effects of RAP-RAS in Mixes October 2011 · RAP 5.0 (0.75) 87 15.0 76.6 Combined Grade. Produced and Placed August 25 Photo taken August 26. Ways to mitigate RAP/RAS concerns: increase

~ 10 million tons of  10 million tons of Hot Mix Asphalt produced for TxDOTproduced for TxDOT each year.

832,000+ tons of RAP used in HMAC in 2010.

Page 4: Effects of RAP-RAS in Mixes October 2011 · RAP 5.0 (0.75) 87 15.0 76.6 Combined Grade. Produced and Placed August 25 Photo taken August 26. Ways to mitigate RAP/RAS concerns: increase

12 Districts (48%) allowed the use of RAP in hot mix h l i 2006asphalt in 2006.

Districts reluctant to use RAP in hot mix asphalt due to high variability indue to high variability in AC content and gradation.gradation.

Single RAP stockpiles Single RAP stockpiles segregated.

Page 5: Effects of RAP-RAS in Mixes October 2011 · RAP 5.0 (0.75) 87 15.0 76.6 Combined Grade. Produced and Placed August 25 Photo taken August 26. Ways to mitigate RAP/RAS concerns: increase

• Approximately 13 million tons of asphalt shingle waste i t dis generated per year– Post manufacture (scrap): 1 5 million(scrap):  1.5 million tons

– Post consumer (tear‐(off): 11.5 million tons

• Less than 5% of shingle waste is recycled

Page 6: Effects of RAP-RAS in Mixes October 2011 · RAP 5.0 (0.75) 87 15.0 76.6 Combined Grade. Produced and Placed August 25 Photo taken August 26. Ways to mitigate RAP/RAS concerns: increase
Page 7: Effects of RAP-RAS in Mixes October 2011 · RAP 5.0 (0.75) 87 15.0 76.6 Combined Grade. Produced and Placed August 25 Photo taken August 26. Ways to mitigate RAP/RAS concerns: increase

Asphalt 5 0%

Fibers 2.5%5.0%

Asphalt24%Fine Agg.

72.5%Fine Agg.

35 0%Coarse Agg.

60 0% 35.0%60.0%

RASRAP RASRAP

Page 8: Effects of RAP-RAS in Mixes October 2011 · RAP 5.0 (0.75) 87 15.0 76.6 Combined Grade. Produced and Placed August 25 Photo taken August 26. Ways to mitigate RAP/RAS concerns: increase

PG 64 22

PG GradeBinder AC %

5 267PG 64-22

RAS

5.2

24.0

67

96

RAP 5.087

Page 9: Effects of RAP-RAS in Mixes October 2011 · RAP 5.0 (0.75) 87 15.0 76.6 Combined Grade. Produced and Placed August 25 Photo taken August 26. Ways to mitigate RAP/RAS concerns: increase

PG GradeBinder AC % % in Mix

PG 64-22

RAS

5.2 (4.2)

24.0

67

96

RAP 5.0 (1.0)87 20.0

Combined Grade70.8

Page 10: Effects of RAP-RAS in Mixes October 2011 · RAP 5.0 (0.75) 87 15.0 76.6 Combined Grade. Produced and Placed August 25 Photo taken August 26. Ways to mitigate RAP/RAS concerns: increase

PG GradeBinder AC % % in Mix

PG 64-22

RAS5.2 (4.0)

24.0 (1.2)

67

96 5.0RAP 5.0

( )

87

Combined Grade73.7

Page 11: Effects of RAP-RAS in Mixes October 2011 · RAP 5.0 (0.75) 87 15.0 76.6 Combined Grade. Produced and Placed August 25 Photo taken August 26. Ways to mitigate RAP/RAS concerns: increase

PG GradeBinder AC % Mix %

PG 64-22

RAS

5.2 (3.25)

24.0 (1.2)

67

96 5.0RAP 5.0 (0.75)

( )

87 15.0

Combined Grade76.6

Page 12: Effects of RAP-RAS in Mixes October 2011 · RAP 5.0 (0.75) 87 15.0 76.6 Combined Grade. Produced and Placed August 25 Photo taken August 26. Ways to mitigate RAP/RAS concerns: increase

Be proactive Improve quality Improve quality Reduce costs Comply with FHWA regulations Technolog impro ements Technology improvements Green Agency (reduce the carbon footprint)

Page 13: Effects of RAP-RAS in Mixes October 2011 · RAP 5.0 (0.75) 87 15.0 76.6 Combined Grade. Produced and Placed August 25 Photo taken August 26. Ways to mitigate RAP/RAS concerns: increase

TxDOT Administration seeing “doom and gloom” for the overall budget and looking for waysto save money now in all areas.

Material Costs –o Asphalt prices -

Then: PG 64-22 cost $163/liquid ton.Now: PG 64-22 costs $575/liquid ton.

o Aggregate prices – definite price increase $500 million spent annually on HMAC.

10% cost reduction is a significant savings.

Page 14: Effects of RAP-RAS in Mixes October 2011 · RAP 5.0 (0.75) 87 15.0 76.6 Combined Grade. Produced and Placed August 25 Photo taken August 26. Ways to mitigate RAP/RAS concerns: increase

RAP, RAS, WMA, Tire rubber, In-Place recycling -new products used to lower current mix costs

Grade dump (softer asphalt grades to addresscracking)g)

Pave-IR to improve consistent temperaturesWMA to lower temperatures and reduceWMA to lower temperatures and reduce

oxidation plus lower fuel costs

Page 15: Effects of RAP-RAS in Mixes October 2011 · RAP 5.0 (0.75) 87 15.0 76.6 Combined Grade. Produced and Placed August 25 Photo taken August 26. Ways to mitigate RAP/RAS concerns: increase

Variable and Contaminated RAP

RAS Clumping

Higher graded asphalt for rutting

Early asphalt oxidation Early asphalt oxidation

Early pavement cracking

Lower cost

Page 16: Effects of RAP-RAS in Mixes October 2011 · RAP 5.0 (0.75) 87 15.0 76.6 Combined Grade. Produced and Placed August 25 Photo taken August 26. Ways to mitigate RAP/RAS concerns: increase
Page 17: Effects of RAP-RAS in Mixes October 2011 · RAP 5.0 (0.75) 87 15.0 76.6 Combined Grade. Produced and Placed August 25 Photo taken August 26. Ways to mitigate RAP/RAS concerns: increase

90

100

70

80

50

60

ent P

assi

ng

30

40Per

ce Maximum Density Line

10

20

0Sieve Size

1 2 3 4 5 6 Avg.

#200 #80 #50 #40 #30 #10 #8 #4 3/8" 1 /2" 5/8" 3/4" 7/8" 1" 1 1/4"

Page 18: Effects of RAP-RAS in Mixes October 2011 · RAP 5.0 (0.75) 87 15.0 76.6 Combined Grade. Produced and Placed August 25 Photo taken August 26. Ways to mitigate RAP/RAS concerns: increase

Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement (RAP)p ( )

Fractionating RAP into 2 or more stockpiles can g psignificantly improve variability.

Gradation and composition ofcomposition of fractionated RAP are typically consistent in size and quality.

Page 19: Effects of RAP-RAS in Mixes October 2011 · RAP 5.0 (0.75) 87 15.0 76.6 Combined Grade. Produced and Placed August 25 Photo taken August 26. Ways to mitigate RAP/RAS concerns: increase

Uniform & Consistent

Page 20: Effects of RAP-RAS in Mixes October 2011 · RAP 5.0 (0.75) 87 15.0 76.6 Combined Grade. Produced and Placed August 25 Photo taken August 26. Ways to mitigate RAP/RAS concerns: increase

-1/2" Inch RAP90

100

70

80Maximum Density Line

50

60

cent

Pas

sing

30

40Per

c

10

20

0Sieve Size

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1112 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Avg.

#200 #80 #50 #40 #30 #10 #8 #4 3/8" 1 /2" 5/8"

Page 21: Effects of RAP-RAS in Mixes October 2011 · RAP 5.0 (0.75) 87 15.0 76.6 Combined Grade. Produced and Placed August 25 Photo taken August 26. Ways to mitigate RAP/RAS concerns: increase
Page 22: Effects of RAP-RAS in Mixes October 2011 · RAP 5.0 (0.75) 87 15.0 76.6 Combined Grade. Produced and Placed August 25 Photo taken August 26. Ways to mitigate RAP/RAS concerns: increase
Page 23: Effects of RAP-RAS in Mixes October 2011 · RAP 5.0 (0.75) 87 15.0 76.6 Combined Grade. Produced and Placed August 25 Photo taken August 26. Ways to mitigate RAP/RAS concerns: increase

PG GradeBinder AC % Mix %

PG 64-22

RAS

5.2 (3.25)

24.0 (1.2)

67

96 5.0RAP 5.0 (0.75)

( )

87 15.0

Combined Grade76.6

Page 24: Effects of RAP-RAS in Mixes October 2011 · RAP 5.0 (0.75) 87 15.0 76.6 Combined Grade. Produced and Placed August 25 Photo taken August 26. Ways to mitigate RAP/RAS concerns: increase
Page 25: Effects of RAP-RAS in Mixes October 2011 · RAP 5.0 (0.75) 87 15.0 76.6 Combined Grade. Produced and Placed August 25 Photo taken August 26. Ways to mitigate RAP/RAS concerns: increase

Produced and Placed August 25Photo taken August 26

Page 26: Effects of RAP-RAS in Mixes October 2011 · RAP 5.0 (0.75) 87 15.0 76.6 Combined Grade. Produced and Placed August 25 Photo taken August 26. Ways to mitigate RAP/RAS concerns: increase
Page 27: Effects of RAP-RAS in Mixes October 2011 · RAP 5.0 (0.75) 87 15.0 76.6 Combined Grade. Produced and Placed August 25 Photo taken August 26. Ways to mitigate RAP/RAS concerns: increase

Ways to mitigate RAP/RAS concerns:y g

increase the target lab density to get more

total asphalt binder into the mixp

start with a lower base asphalt grade to

lessen crackinglessen cracking

utilize a crack measurement test such as the 

Overlay Tester to establish an objectiveOverlay Tester to establish an objective

cracking criteria

use WMA to improve mixing and compaction use WMA to improve mixing and compaction


Recommended