+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Effects of Soluble Cadmium Salts Versus CdSe Quantum Dots on the Growth of Planktonic Pseudomonas...

Effects of Soluble Cadmium Salts Versus CdSe Quantum Dots on the Growth of Planktonic Pseudomonas...

Date post: 14-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: plastioid4079
View: 215 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 18

Transcript
  • 7/30/2019 Effects of Soluble Cadmium Salts Versus CdSe Quantum Dots on the Growth of Planktonic Pseudomonas Aerugino

    1/18

    8/21/13 Effects of soluble cadmium salts versus CdSe quantum dots on the growth of planktonic Pseudomonas aeruginosa | Patricia A. Holden - Academia.edu

    www.academia.edu/1406288/Effects_of_soluble_cadmium_salts_versus_CdSe_quantum_dots_on_the_growth_of_planktonic_Pseudomonas_aeruginosa

    HomeHome Log InLog In Sign UpSign Up

    Effects of soluble cadmium salts versus CdSe quantum dots on the growth of planktonicPseudomonas aeruginosa

    by Patricia A. Holden

    more

    EffectsofSolubleCadmiumSalts

    VersusCdSeQuantumDotsonthe

    GrowthofPlanktonic

    Pseudomonasaeruginosa

    JOHN H. PRIESTER,

    PETER K. STOIMENOV,

    RANDALL E. MIELKE,

    SAMUEL M. WEBB, |

    CHRISTOPHER EHRHARDT,

    JI N PING ZHANG, # GALEN D. STUCKY,

    AND PATRICIA A. HOLDEN* ,

    DonaldBrenSchoolofEnvironmentalScience&Management,DepartmentofChemistryandBiochemistry,EarthSciences,andMaterialsResearchLaboratory,University

    ofCalifornia,SantaBarbara,California93106,CenterforLifeDetection,JetPropulsionLaboratory,CaliforniaInstituteofTechnology,Pasadena,California91109,andStanfordSynchrotronRadiationLaboratory,StanfordLinearAcceleratorCenter,Menlo Park,California94025

    Received October 3, 2008. Revised manuscript receivedJanuary15, 2009.AcceptedJanuary22, 2009.

    Withtheirincreaseduse,engineerednanomaterials(ENMs)will enterthe environmentwheretheymaybealtered bybacteriaandaffectbacterialprocesses.MetallicENMs,suchasCdSequantumdots(QDs),aretoxicduetothereleaseofdissolvedheavymetals,buttheeffectsofcadmiumionsversusintactQDsaremostlyunknown.Here,planktonicPseudomonasaeruginosa PG201bacteriawereculturedwithsimilartotalcadmiumconcentrationsaseitherfullydissolvedcadmiumacetate(Cd(CH3COO)2)orligandcappedCdSeQDs,andcellularmorphology,growthparameters,intracellularreactiveoxygenspecies(ROS),alongwiththemetalandmetalloidfates

    weremeasured.QDsdissolvedpartiallyingrowthmedia,butdissolutionwaslessin bioticculturescomparedto sterilecontrols.Dose-dependentgrowtheffectsweresimilarforlow

    concentrationsofeithercadmiumsaltsorQDs,buteffectsdifferedaboveaconcentrationthresholdof50mg/L(totalcadmiumbasis)where(1)thegrowthofQD-treatedcellswasmoreimpaired,(2)themembranesofQD-growncellsweredamaged,and(3)QD-growncellscontainedQD-sizedCdSecytoplasmicinclusionsinadditiontoSe 0 anddissolvedcadmium.Formostconcentrations,intracellularROSwerehigherforQD-versuscadmiumsalts-grownbacteria.Taken together,QDswere

    moretoxictothisopportunisticpathogenthancadmiumions,andwereaffectedbycellsthroughQDextracellularstabilization,intracellularenrichment,and cell-associateddecay.

    Introduction

    Therapiddevelopmentoftheengineerednanomaterials(ENMs)industry hasr aisedconcernsaboutENM releases to

    theenvironment(1)wherebacteriaareabundant(2)andcancatalyzeessential nutrient-recyclingreactionsduringgrowth(3) andinfluenceENMfates (4). ReportedindividualENM-bacterialbiophysicalinteractionsincludebiosorption,ENMbreakdown(5),andcellularuptake( 6),witheffectsincludingmembranedamageandtoxicity(7,8).However,suchinteractionsarerarelyevaluatedinconcertandovergrowth-associatedtimescales.ThisleavesquestionsaboutENMfatesandeffectswhenbacteriaarepresent,includingthequantitativeimportancetotoxicityendpointsofintact

    ENMsversusbreakdownproducts.For heavy metal-composed ENMssuch as cadmium

    selenide(CdSe)quantumdots(QDs),toxicmetalionsmaycausecellulartoxicity(9).CdSeQDsarefluorescentsemi-conductorENMsofinterestinphotovoltaics( 10)andindiagnosticsforstablylabelingmammaliancells( 11)andbacteria(12).CdSeQDsareoftencappedwithZnStoenhancefluorescence(13);core-shellconfigurationsalsostabilize

    Cd(II)surfaceatomsagainstdissolutionwhichincreasesbiocompatibility(9,14).Still,thereareconcernsaboutcaploss(9,15)andthesubsequenttoxicityofbareQDsanddissolvedcadmium.Cd(II) causescellular toxicity by several mechanisms

    includinginterferingwithDNArepair(16)andmetabolicproteins(17),membrane lipidperoxidation (18), substitutionforphysiologicalZn(II),andreactiveoxygenspecies(ROS)formation(19). In gram-negativebacteria, Cd(II) readilyentersthecellthroughopengateMg(II)transporters.Effluxthroughcadmium-inducedmembraneproteinsisthepri-maryresistancemechanism(20).QDsalsogenerateROS,whichdamagemembranes(21);suchdamagemayaccountforQDsnonspecificallyenteringbacteriainthedark( 22)andinthelight(12).Onceincells,QDtoxicitymayagainbefromeitherintactnanoparticles(12)orfromreleasedCd(II)ions(23).However,stillunknownaretherelativetoxicitiesandfatesof Cd(II)ionsversuse itherabsorbedor assimilated

    intactQDs,especiallywhentheyco-occurinthebacterialgrowthenvironment.Theobjectivesofthisstudyweretoquantifytheeffects

    tobacteriaof ligandcappedCdSeQDsandCd(II)ions, takingintoaccountthatCd(II)ionsmightbegeneratedduringbacterialgrowthifQDsdissolve,andthatQDsmayalsobedirectlytoxic.Weasked:towhatextentdoQDsdissolveinbacterialculture?AreQDsand/orCd(II)ionsassimilatedbycells?Whatis thetoxicityof Cd(II)ions versusQDs?AssumingthatQDs wouldbe toxicdueto dissolvedcadmium,we grewa relativelycadmium-tolerantbacterial strain,PseudomonasaeruginosaPG201,withmeasurablyhightotalcadmiumthatwasinitiallyintheformofeitherCd(II)ionsorQDs.Citratecapped,asopposedtocore -shell(i.e.,metalcapped),QDswereusedto increasethe likelihoodthatboth Cd(II) andQDswouldcoexistin culture,thusprovidingtheopportunitytodifferentiateENMeff ectsfromheavymetaltoxicity.It hasbeenpreviouslyreported( 15,21)thatcappedQDswithno

    dissolvedCd(II)causetoxicity,butthe relativeeffectsof both

    intactQDsanddissolvedCd(II)havenotbeenevaluateduntilnow.BacteriawerealsogrownwithsolublecadmiumsaltstoseparatelyquantifytheeffectsofCd(II)ions.While

    *Correspondingauthore-mail:[email protected];tel:805-893-3195;fax:805-893-7612.

    DonaldBrenSchoolofEnvironmentalScience&Management,Universityof California,Santa Barbara.

    Departmentof Chemistryand Biochemistry, UniversityofCalifornia,SantaBarbara.

    CenterforLifeDetection,JetPropulsionLaboratory,CaliforniaInstituteofTechnology.

    | Stanford SynchrotronRadiation Laboratory,Stanford Linear

    AcceleratorCenter.

    EarthSciences,UniversityofCalifornia,SantaBarbara.# MaterialsResearchLaboratory,UniversityofCalifornia,SantaBarbara.

    Environ.Sci.Technol. 2009, 43, 25892594

    10.1021/es802806nCCC:$40.75 2009AmericanChemical Society VOL. 43, NO. 7,2009 / ENVIRONMENTALSCIENCE&TECHNOLOGY9 2589

    PublishedonWeb02/27/2009

    Download

    edbyUO

    FCALIFORNIAS

    ANTAB

    ARBA

    RAonJuly14,2009

    P

    ublishedonFebruary27,2009onhttp://pubs.acs.org|doi:10.1021/es802806n

    CdSeQDsdid dissolveinbacterial growthmedia,dissolutionwasincomplete.AfteraccountingforeffectsofCd(II)ions,theresidualtoxicityfromintactQDswasrelativelygreaterthantoxicityfrom cadmiumsaltsalone. Thiswork thusrevealstheseparableeffects of QDsand theirreleasedheavymetals,andnewlyevaluatestheeffectsofENMsonanimportantopportunisticpathogen.

    ExperimentalSectionChemicalsandBacterialCulturing. Pseudomonasaerugi-

    InstrumentcalibrationwasagainstcommercialCdandSestandards(SigmaChemical).

    QDIntegritybyXRDandXANES;andAbioticDissolu-tion. AbioticQD dissolution (seeSupporting Information)wasmeasured.QD intracellularintegritywas inferredin twoways:usingX-raydiffractionforcell-associatedQDcrystalstructure,andusingXANESforcellularSeoxidationstate.Se-K-edgeXANESspectrawerecollectedattheStanfordSynchrotronRadiationLaboratory(SSRL)beamline11-2underSPEAR3todeterminetheoxidationstateofSe,using

    overni ht-shi ed(dr ice)tri l icatecell elletsfromaCdSe

    Search People, Research Interests and Universities

    Download

    Priester_et_al_ES_T_

    3.9 MB

    64

    http://www.academia.edu/1406288/Effects_of_soluble_cadmium_salts_versus_CdSe_quantum_dots_on_the_growth_of_planktonic_Pseudomonas_aeruginosahttp://www.academia.edu/attachments/26179556/download_filehttp://www.academia.edu/1406288/Effects_of_soluble_cadmium_salts_versus_CdSe_quantum_dots_on_the_growth_of_planktonic_Pseudomonas_aeruginosa#http://ucsb.academia.edu/PatriciaAHoldenhttp://www.academia.edu/1406288/Effects_of_soluble_cadmium_salts_versus_CdSe_quantum_dots_on_the_growth_of_planktonic_Pseudomonas_aeruginosahttp://www.academia.edu/signuphttp://www.academia.edu/loginhttp://www.academia.edu/http://www.academia.edu/
  • 7/30/2019 Effects of Soluble Cadmium Salts Versus CdSe Quantum Dots on the Growth of Planktonic Pseudomonas Aerugino

    2/18

    8/21/13 Effects of soluble cadmium salts versus CdSe quantum dots on the growth of planktonic Pseudomonas aeruginosa | Patricia A. Holden - Academia.edu

    www.academia.edu/1406288/Effects_of_soluble_cadmium_salts_versus_CdSe_quantum_dots_on_the_growth_of_planktonic_Pseudomonas_aeruginosa 2

    nosa PG201,awell-studiedenvironmentalstrain(24),wasculturedwitheitherCd(II)orCdSeQDsinLuriaBertrani(LB)broth.Allchemicalswerereagentgradeor better(SigmaChemical,St.Louis,MO;andFisherScientific,Hampton,NH). See Supporting Informationfor QD synthesis andculturedetails.

    Cultureswere amendedwith either cadmiumacetate(Cd(CH3COO)2 at5,10,20,37.5,75,115,and150mg/Lascadmium)orCdSeQDs(10,20,37.5,50,75,100and125mg/Lascadmium).Controlsincludedmedium-only(nocadmium)anduninoculatedversionsofeachtreatment. Fiveindependentreplicateswerepreparedforeachtreatmentandcontrol.Cultureswerepreparedin200Lvolumesin96-wellmicroplates(seeSupportingInformationfordetails).At6 hafter inoculation,3 replicatesweresubsampledbyasepticallyremoving2 LforCd(II)ionquantification(seebelow).Totesttheeffectsofcitrateongrowth(atconcentra-tionsatandabovethosepresentwiththeQDs),anadditional

    treatmentinvolvedamendingLB brothwith400,800,or 1200mg/Lsodiumcitrate.GrowthexperimentswithCd(CH 3COO)2 andCdSeQDs

    wererepeatedindependentlyusinglargervolumes(7.5mL)and selected cadmium concentrations (with at least 3replicates)formicroscopy,analysesof intra-and extracellular

    metalsandmacromolecules,andanalysisof intracellularROS.Theoptical density (OD) was monitored (600 nm)todetermineif experimentalscale-upcreatedbias. Anothergrowthexperimentwasforassayingacidificationbymea-suringthepH at 0 and 24h for the control and theCd(CH3COO)2 andCdSeQDtreatmentsamendedwith75mg/Ltotalcadmium.Separate7.5mLcultureswerealsogrowntostudyselenium-onlyeffectsusingsodiumselenite(Na2SeO3)overa concentrationrangeupto 500mg/LSe(IV).

    CellHarvesting. TodeterminethedistributionofCd(II)ionsversusintactQDsinbacterialculture,lateexponentialphase (24h) cultures of the75 mg/L (total cadmium)Cd(CH3COO)2 andCdSeQDtreatmentswereharvestedforquantifyingtotalcellularmetalandmetalloidcontentsbyinductivelycoupledplasmaatomicemissionspectroscopy(ICP-AES),analyzingSeoxidationstatebyX-rayabsorption

    nearedgespectra(XANES),electronmicroscopy,epifluo-rescencemicroscopy,andfordeterminingthecrystalstruc-

    tureof intracellularmetalandmetalloidby X-raydiffraction(XRD).Intracellularbiomacromoleculeswerealsoassayed(seeSupportingInformation).

    IntracellularROS. TotalROSinabioticCdSeandcad-miumacetatesolutions,andinmidexponentialphase P.aeruginosacultures,werequantifiedusingthe2 ,7-dichlo-rofluoresceindiacetate(DCFH-DA)assay( 25,26)(seeSup-portingInformationforassaydetails).

    TotalandDissolvedCadmiumQuantification.DissolvedcadmiumwasquantifiedbytheMeasure-iTkit(Invitrogen,Carlsbad,CA).CalibrationstandardswerepreparedusingCd(CH3COO)2 (0,25,50,75,and100mg/Lascadmium)inallrelevantaqueousconditions:nanopureH2O,sterileLB,andfilter-sterilized(0.2 m)lateexponentialphase(24h)culturesupernatant.ICP-AESwithaTJAHighResolutionIRISinstrument(ThermoElectronCorporation,Waltham,MA)wasusedtoquantifytotalseleniumandcadmium.

    QD(75mg/L)treatmentfor24h culturesas describedabove.DetaileddescriptionsoftheXANESandXRDmethods

    arelocatedintheSupportingInformation.MicroscopyandImageAnalysis.Phase-contrastmicros-

    copy(NikonE800at1000 totalmagnification,withimageacquisition)wasusedformeasuring(inmicrographsusingPhotoshop5.5)the cellaspectratiosoftencellspertreatmentforculturealiquotsdispenseddirectlyontomicroscopeslides.Total cell counts were determined by epifluorescencemicroscopyofcellsfromseparatelygrownlateexponentialphasecultures(LBcontrolsand75mg/LtotalcadmiumaseitherQDs or Cd(II)ions) that were SYBR gold-stained(Invitrogen,Carlsbad,CA)andcountedasbefore(27).High-resolutionmicroscopywasusedto assessmembrane

    integrityandmetal,metalloid,andQDlocalizationincells.Scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) andenergydispersiveX-rayanalysis(EDXA)wereperformedusing24h culturesforthe75mg/L(total cadmium)QDandCd(II)

    treatmentspluscontrols.SeetheSupportingInformationforsamplepreparationandinstrumentdetails.STEMmicrographswereanalyzedinAdobePhotoshop

    forcellandnanoparticledimensions,nanoparticlecounts,andmembranedamagefrequency.Celldimensionsweremeasuredfromlongitudinalandverticalcrosssections(5

    each),andcellsurfaceareasandvolumeswerecalculatedassumingcylindricalgeometry.

    DataAnalysis.CellularSeandCdcontentswerenormal-izedtocellcountsasbefore(27).Statisticalanalyseswereperformedwith SPSS 12.0.1 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) orMicrosoftExcel2 000software.Meanswere comparedby theStudent t test. Where applicable, standard errors werepropagatedaccordingtostandardmethods(28).

    ResultsBacterialGrowth and Relationship to QD Dissolution.Growth of P. aeruginosa PG201 was inhibitedby bothCd(CH3COO)2 (FigureS1)andCdSeQDs(FigureS2)inthatincreasedtotalcadmiumresultedinlongerlagtimes,lowerspecificgrowthrates,andlower yields(TablesS1,S2).Growthparametersappearedrelated tototal cadmiumconcentration

    similarlyforQD-treatedandCd(CH3COO)2-treatedcultures(TablesS1andS2).ThepHwasconstantduringgrowthandaveraged7.4 ( 0.1.Neithersodiumcitrate(FigureS3),norsodiumselenite(datanotshown)inhibitedgrowth.BecausegrowthwitheitherQDsorCd(CH 3COO)2 ap-

    peared similar (Figure S1and S2;TablesS1 andS2),completeQDdissolutionwasimplied.Still,severaltestswereperformedtoquantifyQDdissolution:(1)adialysisstudyof initialdissolutionkineticsinwater(SupportingInformation2.2;FigureS4); (2)dialysis studiestodetermineaqueouschemistryeffectson24hdissolutionendpoints(SupportingInforma-tion2.2;FigureS5); and(3)Cd(II)ionquantificationinculturesat6h,i.e.,entryintoexponentialphaseformostcultures.Mostrelevantto growth,QDswere between 25 and50%dissolvedinculturesat6h(FiguresS1andS2earlyexponentialphase),andtherelationshipbetweenthetotalanddissolvedfractionwasexpectedlylinear(FigureS6).Relatingspecificgrowthratestotheconcentrationof

    dissolvedCd(II)at6h(i.e.,endoflagphase)revealedthat

    2590 9 ENVIRONMENTALSCIENCE&TECHNOLOGY / VOL.43,NO.7, 2009

    DownloadedbyUO

    FCALIFORNIASA

    NTAB

    ARBARAonJuly14,2009

    PublishedonFebruary27,2009onhttp://pubs.acs.org|doi:1

    0.1021/es802806n

    QD-versusCd(CH 3COO)2-treatedcultureswere similarlyaffectedatlowertotalcadmiumconcentrations(Figure1).However,fordissolvedcadmiumconcentrationsexceedingapproximately20mg/L(i.e.,totalQDcadmium50mg/L)growthratesofQD-treatedculturescontinuedtodeclinesteeplyasafunctionofCd(II)dosewhilegrowthratesforCd(CH3COO)2-treatedcultureswerelesssensitivetocad-miumdose(Figure1).WhenplottedagainstdissolvedCd(II),the other growth curve metrics of lag time and yield(maximumOD)alsoshowedstrongereffectswithQDsincomparisontoCd(CH3COO)2 (FigureS7).

    CellularMorphologyandEstimatedIntracellularNano-particles.Above50mg/Ltotalcadmium,QD-andCd(CH 3COO)2-

    averageof1.87(0.16105nanoparticlespercell. Intra- andextracellularquantumdotconcentrationswerecalculatedusingthelattercountsaswellasthemeasuredextracellular

    concentrationsof totaland dissolvedcadmium(SupportingInformation2.3).Nofurtherevaluationwasmadeofthecadmium-richinclusionswithin Cd(CH3COO)2-treatedcells.

    Metal,Metalloid, andBiomacromolecule Contents.Forculturesgrownwith75mg/Lcadmium,totalintracellularcadmium(byICP-AES)at24h(earlystationaryphase)wassimilarforQD-andCd(CH3COO 2)2-treatedculturesandaveraged0.15 ( 0.02pgcell-1,whichwasapproximately4%of thatadministered.Assumingcelldimensions(fromSTEMimages)andcounts(fromepifluorescentmicroscopy),theintracellularconcentrationofthisdissolvedCd(II)wasthenapproximately335g/L,whichwas4460timeshigherthanthe medium.Cellsgrown with QDs(75 mg/L) hadanintracellular Se content (by ICP-AES) of 0.08(0.01pgcell-1,

    whichappeared,byXANES,tobemainlySe0

    orotherreducedorganoseleniumcompounds(FigureS10).BybothICP-AESandtheMeasureiT assay,all of theintracellularCd(II)appearedto bedissolved(TableS3).However,a relativelyweakXRDpeakat2 24 supportedthatcellscontainedatleastsomeintactCdSecrystals(FigureS11).Thispeakisconsistentwiththe dominantpeakfor CdSeQDssynthesizedaccordingtothesamemethodsthatweused(29).However,thispeakwasonlyslightlyabovebackground,andotheridentifyingpeakswerelikelyobscuredbythedominantAlpeaks.QDand Cd(CH3COO)2-treatedcells hadgreater amounts

    of intracellularprotein,DNA,andcarbohydratesascomparedto control cultures (Supporting Information 2.4). Also,comparedto sterilecontrols, QDsin cultureswere lessdissolved(68.5%vs59.7%,respectively)after24h,whichimpliedsome extracellularQD stabilizationin cultures(TableS3).

    IntracellularROSandMediaROS.Aftercor rectingforbackgroundfluorescence(fromDCFH,butnotfromeithercellsorQDswhichdidnotinterfere),andconvertingDCFHfluorescencetoH2O2 equivalents,neitherQDsnorcadmiumsalts at 10mg/L total cadmium resulted in measurable

    FIGURE 1. Specific growth rate o f P. aeruginosa versusdissolved cadmium amended as either cadmium acetate(squares)orCdSeQDs(diamonds).Asshowninthegraph,allcadmiumtreatmentsresultinreducedgrowthratesrelativetothe no-cadmium control (dark circle). At QD concentrationsexceeding50 mg/L(total cadmiumbasis),QDs remainrelativelytoxicwhileculturesappear toresist Cd(II)ions.

    LIFORNIAS

    ANTAB

    ARBARAonJuly14,2009

    2009onhttp://pubs.acs.org|doi:10.1021/es802806n

  • 7/30/2019 Effects of Soluble Cadmium Salts Versus CdSe Quantum Dots on the Growth of Planktonic Pseudomonas Aerugino

    3/18

    8/21/13 Effects of soluble cadmium salts versus CdSe quantum dots on the growth of planktonic Pseudomonas aeruginosa | Patricia A. Holden - Academia.edu

    www.academia.edu/1406288/Effects_of_soluble_cadmium_salts_versus_CdSe_quantum_dots_on_the_growth_of_planktonic_Pseudomonas_aeruginosa 3

    grown c u ures a ppeare o r espon eren y o edissolvedcadmiumdose(Figure1).Thusoneconcentrationabovethisthresholdwaschosenforanalyzingcellularsize,morphology,andcomparativemetal,metalloid,andbiom-acromoleculecontentsfortheQDandCd(CH 3COO)2 treat-ments.Usinglowerresolution(i.e.,1000)phasecontrastmicroscopy,QD-growncellswereshorterasindicatedbyloweraspectratios (3.3( 0.2)comparedto either cadmium-treated(3.8 ( 0.3)orcontrol(3.9 ( 0.2)cells.Usinghigh-resolutionSTEM,cellsculturedwithCd(CH3COO)2appearedsimilar to no-metal controls except for electron densedepositsinandnearthemembranes(Figure2AvsB)that,byEDXA,werecadmium-rich(datanot shown).Cellsculturedwith QDs alsocontainedCd- andSe-rich electrondenseintracellulardeposits(FigureS8)butwerehighlydisfigured(Figure2C).Atotalof54QD-grownand46Cd(CH3COO)2-treatedcellsinSTEMimageswereevaluatedformembranedamage, asdefinedby holes,blebbing,or detachmentof theplasmamembrane fromthece llwall (Figure S9).Most (81%;

    n) 44)oftheQD-treatedandfewer(33%; n) 15)oftheCd(CH3COO)2-treatedcellshadmembranedamage(e.g.,Figure2 ).Blebbing(FigureS9B) wasobservedinQD-treated,butnotforCd(CH3COO)2-treatedcells.Nanosizedparticlesappeared throughouttheQD-treated

    cells(Figure2C),whileintheCd(CH 3COO)2-treated cellsparticleswereintheperiplasmicspace(Figure2B).Themeanparticlediametersdiffered(ttest,P) 0.00),with8.02 ( 0.24nmand14.99 ( 0.54nmfortheQDandCd(CH 3COO)2treatments,respectively.BecausethenanosizedparticlesintheQDtreatmentsweresimilarinsizetotheadministeredQDs(5nm),theseparticleswerecounted,resultinginan

    n race u ar a er o grow . owever, a ca m umconcentrationsspanning20 through125mg/L,cellularROSwassignificantlygreaterforQD-versusCd(II)-growncells(Figure 3).Abiotic ROSgeneration wasgreaterforQDs inLBthanforQDsinwater(detailedinSupportingInformation2.5).LBalonealsogeneratedROS,butatamuchlowerconcentrationthanforeitherLBorwaterplusQDs(Sup-portingInformation2.5).Aftercorrectingforbackgroundfluorescence(asabove)

    andagainconvertingfluorescencetoH2O2equivalents,sterileLBbrothplusDCFHyieldedanROSconcentrationof534 (183mg/LH2O2.WhenaddedtoeitherLBortowater,CdSeQDsalsogeneratedROSabiotically,albeittoamuchlesserextentinwaterascomparedtoLBbroth(FigureS12)andtoamuchgreaterextentthanLB alone(above).CadmiumsaltsaddedtoeithersterileLBorwaterdidnotresultinROSformation.Thepatternof ROSversuscadmiumconcentrationwassimilarwhencomparingthebiotic (Figure3) andabiotic

    (Figure S12) QD treatments, with the exception of thedecreaseat125mg/Lcadmiumfortheabiotictreatments.

    Discussion

    PriorreportsforCdSeQDssuggestthatsurfacecapandsolutionchemistrymodulatetoxicityfrom cadmiumions(9,15).YetZnS-capped,i.e.,coreshell,CdSe( 15)andCdTe(21)QDsthatdidnotreleasecadmiumionswerestilltoxic,andPEG-modifiedCdSeQDswer eto xictomammaliancellsinadose-dependentfashioncorrespondingtointracellu-larizedQDs(23).Intheenvironment,variousabioticandbioticfate-relatedprocessesaffectingENMphasedistribution

    VOL.43,NO.7, 2009/ ENVIRONMENTALSCIENCE&TECHNOLOGY9 2591

    DownloadedbyUO

    F

    PublishedonFebruary27,

  • 7/30/2019 Effects of Soluble Cadmium Salts Versus CdSe Quantum Dots on the Growth of Planktonic Pseudomonas Aerugino

    4/18

    8/21/13 Effects of soluble cadmium salts versus CdSe quantum dots on the growth of planktonic Pseudomonas aeruginosa | Patricia A. Holden - Academia.edu

    www.academia.edu/1406288/Effects_of_soluble_cadmium_salts_versus_CdSe_quantum_dots_on_the_growth_of_planktonic_Pseudomonas_aeruginosa 4

  • 7/30/2019 Effects of Soluble Cadmium Salts Versus CdSe Quantum Dots on the Growth of Planktonic Pseudomonas Aerugino

    5/18

    8/21/13 Effects of soluble cadmium salts versus CdSe quantum dots on the growth of planktonic Pseudomonas aeruginosa | Patricia A. Holden - Academia.edu

    www.academia.edu/1406288/Effects_of_soluble_cadmium_salts_versus_CdSe_quantum_dots_on_the_growth_of_planktonic_Pseudomonas_aeruginosa 5

  • 7/30/2019 Effects of Soluble Cadmium Salts Versus CdSe Quantum Dots on the Growth of Planktonic Pseudomonas Aerugino

    6/18

    8/21/13 Effects of soluble cadmium salts versus CdSe quantum dots on the growth of planktonic Pseudomonas aeruginosa | Patricia A. Holden - Academia.edu

    www.academia.edu/1406288/Effects_of_soluble_cadmium_salts_versus_CdSe_quantum_dots_on_the_growth_of_planktonic_Pseudomonas_aeruginosa 6

  • 7/30/2019 Effects of Soluble Cadmium Salts Versus CdSe Quantum Dots on the Growth of Planktonic Pseudomonas Aerugino

    7/18

    8/21/13 Effects of soluble cadmium salts versus CdSe quantum dots on the growth of planktonic Pseudomonas aeruginosa | Patricia A. Holden - Academia.edu

    www.academia.edu/1406288/Effects_of_soluble_cadmium_salts_versus_CdSe_quantum_dots_on_the_growth_of_planktonic_Pseudomonas_aeruginosa 7

  • 7/30/2019 Effects of Soluble Cadmium Salts Versus CdSe Quantum Dots on the Growth of Planktonic Pseudomonas Aerugino

    8/18

    8/21/13 Effects of soluble cadmium salts versus CdSe quantum dots on the growth of planktonic Pseudomonas aeruginosa | Patricia A. Holden - Academia.edu

    www.academia.edu/1406288/Effects_of_soluble_cadmium_salts_versus_CdSe_quantum_dots_on_the_growth_of_planktonic_Pseudomonas_aeruginosa 8

  • 7/30/2019 Effects of Soluble Cadmium Salts Versus CdSe Quantum Dots on the Growth of Planktonic Pseudomonas Aerugino

    9/18

    8/21/13 Effects of soluble cadmium salts versus CdSe quantum dots on the growth of planktonic Pseudomonas aeruginosa | Patricia A. Holden - Academia.edu

    www.academia.edu/1406288/Effects_of_soluble_cadmium_salts_versus_CdSe_quantum_dots_on_the_growth_of_planktonic_Pseudomonas_aeruginosa 9

  • 7/30/2019 Effects of Soluble Cadmium Salts Versus CdSe Quantum Dots on the Growth of Planktonic Pseudomonas Aerugino

    10/18

    8/21/13 Effects of soluble cadmium salts versus CdSe quantum dots on the growth of planktonic Pseudomonas aeruginosa | Patricia A. Holden - Academia.edu

    www.academia.edu/1406288/Effects_of_soluble_cadmium_salts_versus_CdSe_quantum_dots_on_the_growth_of_planktonic_Pseudomonas_aeruginosa 10

  • 7/30/2019 Effects of Soluble Cadmium Salts Versus CdSe Quantum Dots on the Growth of Planktonic Pseudomonas Aerugino

    11/18

    8/21/13 Effects of soluble cadmium salts versus CdSe quantum dots on the growth of planktonic Pseudomonas aeruginosa | Patricia A. Holden - Academia.edu

    www.academia.edu/1406288/Effects_of_soluble_cadmium_salts_versus_CdSe_quantum_dots_on_the_growth_of_planktonic_Pseudomonas_aeruginosa 1

  • 7/30/2019 Effects of Soluble Cadmium Salts Versus CdSe Quantum Dots on the Growth of Planktonic Pseudomonas Aerugino

    12/18

    8/21/13 Effects of soluble cadmium salts versus CdSe quantum dots on the growth of planktonic Pseudomonas aeruginosa | Patricia A. Holden - Academia.edu

    www.academia.edu/1406288/Effects_of_soluble_cadmium_salts_versus_CdSe_quantum_dots_on_the_growth_of_planktonic_Pseudomonas_aeruginosa 12

  • 7/30/2019 Effects of Soluble Cadmium Salts Versus CdSe Quantum Dots on the Growth of Planktonic Pseudomonas Aerugino

    13/18

    8/21/13 Effects of soluble cadmium salts versus CdSe quantum dots on the growth of planktonic Pseudomonas aeruginosa | Patricia A. Holden - Academia.edu

    www.academia.edu/1406288/Effects_of_soluble_cadmium_salts_versus_CdSe_quantum_dots_on_the_growth_of_planktonic_Pseudomonas_aeruginosa 13

  • 7/30/2019 Effects of Soluble Cadmium Salts Versus CdSe Quantum Dots on the Growth of Planktonic Pseudomonas Aerugino

    14/18

    8/21/13 Effects of soluble cadmium salts versus CdSe quantum dots on the growth of planktonic Pseudomonas aeruginosa | Patricia A. Holden - Academia.edu

    www.academia.edu/1406288/Effects_of_soluble_cadmium_salts_versus_CdSe_quantum_dots_on_the_growth_of_planktonic_Pseudomonas_aeruginosa 14

  • 7/30/2019 Effects of Soluble Cadmium Salts Versus CdSe Quantum Dots on the Growth of Planktonic Pseudomonas Aerugino

    15/18

    8/21/13 Effects of soluble cadmium salts versus CdSe quantum dots on the growth of planktonic Pseudomonas aeruginosa | Patricia A. Holden - Academia.edu

    www.academia.edu/1406288/Effects_of_soluble_cadmium_salts_versus_CdSe_quantum_dots_on_the_growth_of_planktonic_Pseudomonas_aeruginosa 15

  • 7/30/2019 Effects of Soluble Cadmium Salts Versus CdSe Quantum Dots on the Growth of Planktonic Pseudomonas Aerugino

    16/18

    8/21/13 Effects of soluble cadmium salts versus CdSe quantum dots on the growth of planktonic Pseudomonas aeruginosa | Patricia A. Holden - Academia.edu

    www.academia.edu/1406288/Effects_of_soluble_cadmium_salts_versus_CdSe_quantum_dots_on_the_growth_of_planktonic_Pseudomonas_aeruginosa 16

  • 7/30/2019 Effects of Soluble Cadmium Salts Versus CdSe Quantum Dots on the Growth of Planktonic Pseudomonas Aerugino

    17/18

    8/21/13 Effects of soluble cadmium salts versus CdSe quantum dots on the growth of planktonic Pseudomonas aeruginosa | Patricia A. Holden - Academia.edu

    www.academia.edu/1406288/Effects_of_soluble_cadmium_salts_versus_CdSe_quantum_dots_on_the_growth_of_planktonic_Pseudomonas_aeruginosa 17

  • 7/30/2019 Effects of Soluble Cadmium Salts Versus CdSe Quantum Dots on the Growth of Planktonic Pseudomonas Aerugino

    18/18

    8/21/13 Effects of soluble cadmium salts versus CdSe quantum dots on the growth of planktonic Pseudomonas aeruginosa | Patricia A. Holden - Academia.edu

    Job Board About Press Blog Stories We're hiring engineers! FAQ Journals Terms Privacy Copyright Send us Feedback

    Academia 2013

    http://www.academia.edu/feedbackhttp://www.academia.edu/copyrighthttp://www.academia.edu/privacyhttp://www.academia.edu/termshttp://journals.academia.edu/http://www.academia.edu/FAQhttp://www.academia.edu/hiringhttp://academia.edu/storieshttp://blog.academia.edu/http://www.academia.edu/presshttp://www.academia.edu/abouthttp://www.academia.edu/Jobs

Recommended