+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Effet Multipactor - Présentation Nicolas Fil...theoretical modelling using state of the art MHD and...

Effet Multipactor - Présentation Nicolas Fil...theoretical modelling using state of the art MHD and...

Date post: 24-Oct-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 6 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
23
EUROfusion Consortium, JET, Culham Science Centre, Abingdon, OX14 3DB, UK 1 MIT PSFC, 175 Albany Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA 2 Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), SPC, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland 3 CCFE, Culham Science Centre, Abingdon, OX14 3DB, UK 4 Department of Physics and Astronomy, UCI, California 92697, USA 5 CEA, IRFM, F-13108 Saint-Paul-lez-Durance, France 6 PPPL, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08543, USA 7 See the author list of X. Litaudon et al., Nucl. Fusion 57, 102001 (2017). N . Fil 1 , M. Porkolab 1 , V. Aslanyan 1 , P. Puglia 2 , S. E. Sharapov 3 , S. Dowson 3 , H. K. Sheikh 3 , S. Taimourzadeh 4 , L. Shi 4 , Z. Lin 4 , P. Blanchard 2 , A. Fasoli 2 , D. Testa 2 , J. Mailloux 3 , M. Tsalas 3 , M. Maslov 3 , A. Whitehead 3 , R. Scannell 3 , S. Gerasimov 3 , S. Dorling 3 , G. Jones 3 , A. Goodyear 3 , K. K. Kirov 3 , R. Dumont 5 , G. Dong 6 and JET Contributors 7
Transcript
  • EUROfusion Consortium, JET, Culham Science Centre, Abingdon, OX14 3DB, UK

    1MIT PSFC, 175 Albany Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA2Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), SPC, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland3CCFE, Culham Science Centre, Abingdon, OX14 3DB, UK4Department of Physics and Astronomy, UCI, California 92697, USA5CEA, IRFM, F-13108 Saint-Paul-lez-Durance, France6PPPL, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08543, USA7See the author list of X. Litaudon et al., Nucl. Fusion 57, 102001 (2017).

    N. Fil1, M. Porkolab1, V. Aslanyan1, P. Puglia2, S. E. Sharapov3, S. Dowson3, H. K.

    Sheikh3, S. Taimourzadeh4, L. Shi4, Z. Lin4, P. Blanchard2, A. Fasoli2, D. Testa2, J.

    Mailloux3, M. Tsalas3, M. Maslov3, A. Whitehead3, R. Scannell3, S. Gerasimov3, S.

    Dorling3, G. Jones3, A. Goodyear3, K. K. Kirov3, R. Dumont5, G. Dong6 and JET

    Contributors7

  • Nicolas Fil, APS DPP 2018 – Poster | 05 November 2018

    Abstract

    The resonant detection and measurement of the damping rates of Alfvén Eigenmodes (AEs) is of

    critical importance to the design of experiments and development of models of AE stability [1].

    We performed experimental measurements on JET with the AE Active Diagnostic (AEAD), and

    theoretical modelling using state of the art MHD and gyrokinetic codes.

    The AEAD has undergone a major upgrade [2]. It can provide a state of the art excitation and

    real-time detection system thanks to its new amplifiers, filters, digital control system and to the

    newly installed magnetic probes. Weakly-damped AEs have been resonantly probed with

    external antennas. With GTC [3] we have simulated both stable and unstable AEs by using

    equilibria and diagnostic data from JET pulses dedicated to TAEs studies. Good agreement was

    obtained between simulations and experiments which adds confidence to further predictions for

    next-step burning plasma experiments, including JET and ITER.

    [1] W. W. Heidbrink, Phys. Plasmas 15, 055501 (2008)

    [2] P. Puglia et al., Nucl. Fusion 56, 112020 (2016)

    [3] Z. Wang et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 145003 (2013)

    *This work has been carried out within the framework of the EUROfusion Consortium and has received funding

    from the Euratom research and training programme 2014-2018 under grant agreement No 633053. The views

    and opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of the European Commission.

    This work has been part-funded by the RCUK Energy Programme [grant number EP/P012450/1] Support for

    MIT was provided by the US DOE / DE-FG02-99ER54563, for the Brazilian group the FAPESP Project

    2011/50773-0, and for the Swiss group in part by the Swiss NSF.

    | PAGE 2

  • Nicolas Fil, APS DPP 2018 – Poster | 05 November 2018

    Physics issues

    | PAGE 3

    For typical fusion plasma parameters, the phase velocity of the Alfvén wave is just lower than fusion-

    born alpha particle speed.

    ⇒ Possibility of Alfvén wave-particle resonance: effective exchange of energy and momentum with the modes. The exchange time scale is much shorter than alpha particle relaxation time, then:

    ⇒ self-heating process can be compromised ⇒ damages to the first wall by the ejection of highly energetic alphas

    Dispersion relation with (solid) and without

    (dashed) toroidal coupling of the waves

    Excite AEs with an external antenna of variable frequency

    [W.W. Heidbrink, Phys. Plasmas 15, 055501 (2008)]

    Frequency

    gap

    In toroidally confined plasmas:

    ⇒ the index of refraction is periodic

    ⇒ gaps appear in the continuous spectrum

    Possibility of weakly-damped Alfvén Eigenmodes (AEs)

    in these gaps.

    Frequency (left) and mode structure (right).

  • Nicolas Fil, APS DPP 2018 – Poster | 05 November 2018

    Leadership of project

    Analysis software and

    physics

    Engineering support

    Part-time PostDoc

    National Instrument units for

    control/digitization

    Engineering support

    PostDoc time for operation, analysis

    and modelling work

    A collaborative international project at JET

    | PAGE 4

    Modelling activities

    Use of Gyrokinetic Toroidal Code

    (GTC)

    Project management

    Engineering and system

    integration

    Redesign of the whole system

    Responsible for ongoing

    maintenance

    Engineering of amplifiers

    Control system and

    commissioning

    Engineering support

    Filters and test modules

  • Nicolas Fil, APS DPP 2018 – Poster | 05 November 2018

    Aims of the project

    | PAGE 5

    Wide range of experiments and theoretical studies of Alfvén Eigenmodes (AEs): structure,

    frequencies and stability.

    The AEAD can probe stable AEs of the plasma and measure its net damping rate.

    Upgraded AEAD system covers the toroidal mode number (n) range that is anticipated to be

    the most unstable in ITER, 4 ≤ n ≤ 15

    The AEAD will be continuously operated in the full range of isotope experiments preceding a

    full DT campaign.

    Modelling work, gyrokinetic simulations of AEs in collaboration with UC Irvine to supplement

    the ongoing use of ideal MHD codes, such as MISHKA.

    Experimental and theoretical studies of Geodesic Acoustic Modes (GAMs), Beta (Acoustic)

    AEs (BAE/BAAEs) and Reverse Shear AEs (RSAEs) which are predicted to be of

    importance by drift-kinetic and gyrokinetic theory.

    Precise validation of the quantitative model of each of the individual damping mechanisms,

    and their significance in different ITER and DEMO relevant scenarios.

  • Nicolas Fil, APS DPP 2018 – Poster | 05 November 2018

    Aims of the AEAD upgrade

    The AEAD has gone through a major upgrade to allow for the probing of AEs in plasma

    configurations which were not possible in the past due to insufficient power. Use of

    independently controlled amplifiers to allow arbitrary phasing which is crucial to couple to

    modes with high toroidal number n.

    Individual 4kW RF amplifiers

    Separate excitation & real time control of relative phase between antenna currents

    Increased RF current (15A limit).

    Increased frequency range of operation, 10kHz – 1000 kHz

    Selection of the antennas’ toroidal spectrum for Alfvén Eigenmodes of interest with

    toroidal mode number 4 ≤ n ≤ 15

    New Digital Control System (named Master Driver)

    To control the system and drive the currents in the individual antenna coils with the

    desired frequency, amplitude and relative phase.

    New set of filters for lower frequencies have been procured and commissioned last year

    Study of GAMs, BAE/BAAEs and RSAEs

    | PAGE 6

  • Nicolas Fil, APS DPP 2018 – Poster | 05 November 2018

    JET upgraded Alfvén Eigenmode Active

    Diagnostic (AEAD)

    | PAGE 7

    8 in-vessel antennas – 18 turns

    4 on each side of the torus (180o)

    (2 antennas on Octant 8 unavailable)

    Photo: Antennas 1 – 4 Octant 4

    Matching units:

    Filters available:

    125 – 250 kHz

    75 – 150 kHz

    25 – 50 kHz

    19th low pass filters

    -70 dB of the 3rd harmonic

    200 kHz/s frequency sweeps

  • Nicolas Fil, APS DPP 2018 – Poster | 05 November 2018

    Matching Unit – Low Pass Filters

    19th order low pass Chebyshev filters

    70 dB attenuation for third harmonic

    200 kHz/s frequency sweeps

    Limited at 15A and 1.1kV at feedthrough (protected

    from overvoltage and overcurrent in real time)

    | PAGE 8

    Frequency (kHz)

    Goal: -70dB

    250 kHz filter50 kHz filter

    Cut-off frequency

  • Nicolas Fil, APS DPP 2018 – Poster | 05 November 2018

    Master Driver (MD)

    To control the system and drive the currents in the individual antenna

    coils with the desired frequency, amplitude and relative phase.

    Essentially a National Instruments (NI) PXI express chassis.

    LabView Real Time (RT) and Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA)

    software performing the various amplifier control functions

    Creates reference signal for up to 8 antennas

    Real time control < 1𝑚𝑠Frequency control ∆𝑓 < 0.1%Phase control ∅ ± 3°

    | PAGE 9

  • Nicolas Fil, APS DPP 2018 – Poster | 05 November 2018

    AEAD capabilities, improvement ongoing

    6 switching amplifiers: power of 4kW with pulse times of 15 seconds

    Operation close to feed-through limits of 1.1kV and current limit of 15A

    Phase errors depends on the frequency range, target of few degrees

    | PAGE 10

    Operation with ASYNC shots (vacuum):

    50 100 150 200 250

    Freq (kHz)

    I (A

    )

    12

    10

    8

    6

    4

    50 100 150 200 250

    Freq (kHz)

    Z(O

    hm

    s)

  • Nicolas Fil, APS DPP 2018 – Poster | 05 November 2018

    JET restart discharges

    SYNC shots (plasmas) with the 125 – 250 kHz filters:

    Operation of the AEAD at the end (63s to 66s) of repeated 1.85MA/2.2T shorter He4

    pulses with BreakDown in He.

    Reproductive observation on these pulses, JPN ∈ 93066, 93072 (on 24/10/2018)

    | PAGE 11

    Similar

    observations

    with:

    T001

    T002

    T007

    T008

    T009

    H302

    H303

    H304

    H305

    Phase control disable

  • Nicolas Fil, APS DPP 2018 – Poster | 05 November 2018

    Antennas

    Damping rate measurement

    Modes appear as resonances on magnetic sensors at the

    mode frequency

    Damping rate proportional to “quality factor” (q) – width of

    the resonance

    Equivalent to damped harmonic oscillator

    Transfer function:

    | PAGE 12

  • Nicolas Fil, APS DPP 2018 – Poster | 05 November 2018

    TAEs damping rate measurements in M15-24

    experiments

    Damping rates of

    marginally stable TAEs

    have been measured in

    M15-24 experiments

    (Real) Frequencies

    consistent with nearby

    unstable modes (at

    51.05s compared to

    50.6s)

    Too few coils to perform

    reasonable mode

    number analysis.

    For next campaigns:

    25 magnetic coils

    installed during last

    shutdown

    | PAGE 13

  • Nicolas Fil, APS DPP 2018 – Poster | 05 November 2018

    Modelling activities, GTC

    New collaboration with UC Irvine to work with the Gyrokinetic Toroidal Code (GTC)

    Gyrokinetic simulations of low frequency AEs.

    To supplement the ongoing use of ideal MHD codes, such as MISHKA.

    Used to determine the structure, frequencies and stability of AEs in JET plasmas.

    GTC electromagnetic simulations have bulk and “fast” ions, treated gyrokinetically or with a

    reduced MHD model

    Electrons are treated with a fluid-kinetic model [1] or with a fluid (adiabatic) response

    | PAGE 14

    [1] Z. Wang, Z. Lin et al. Phys. Plasmas 22, 022509 (2015).

    Gyrokinetic ions/fast ions Fluid-kinetic electrons

    - Electrostatic potential

  • Nicolas Fil, APS DPP 2018 – Poster | 05 November 2018

    Mode structure and growth in GTC

    Equilibrium chosen when many unstable

    modes are observed; n=5 chosen

    Fully gyrokinetic ions, kinetic electrons and

    fast ions at ~747 keV (500 keV at mode

    location)

    Net growth rate and frequency deduced from

    the oscillations of highest amplitude poloidal

    harmonic (m=11)

    Antenna structure is composed of two

    poloidal harmonics to resemble fast ion

    mode structure (m=11, m=12)

    Radial profile of each is Gaussian

    Amplitude response has beat pattern which

    peaks (time indicated by red cross)

    | PAGE 15

  • Nicolas Fil, APS DPP 2018 – Poster | 05 November 2018

    Synthetic antenna (I)

    Maximum amplitudes of beat pattern

    (as denoted by red cross) similar to a

    driven damped harmonic oscillator

    Spectral response is similarly given

    by the following:

    Damping rates of marginally stable

    modes can therefore be determined

    | PAGE 16

  • Nicolas Fil, APS DPP 2018 – Poster | 05 November 2018

    Synthetic antenna (II)

    Changing the physics mode allows the effect of different damping mechanisms to be

    determined

    Electron Landau damping: kinetic/adiabatic electrons

    Ion Landau damping: gyrokinetic/MHD-like ions

    | PAGE 17

    Mechanism Drive/damping

    Continuum 0%

    Electron Landau -0.09%

    Ion Landau -1.64%

    Radiative -1.18%

    Energetic

    particle

    +4.29%

  • Nicolas Fil, APS DPP 2018 – Poster | 05 November 2018

    Modes relative to Alfvén Continuum

    ALCON routine calculates

    continuum structure

    including acoustic couplings

    Modes plotted relative to

    observed plasma-frame

    frequency

    Error bars equivalent to

    FWHM

    | PAGE 18

  • Nicolas Fil, APS DPP 2018 – Poster | 05 November 2018

    Three measurements of marginally stable TAEs made in two discharges by the Alfvén

    Eigenmode Active Diagnostic (AEAD)

    Frequency and damping rate deduced from transfer function:

    Small number of remaining magnetic probes leads to large uncertainty in damping rate

    and mode number (the latter cannot be consistently identified)

    GTC comparison to AEAD, antenna measurements

    | PAGE 19

  • Nicolas Fil, APS DPP 2018 – Poster | 05 November 2018

    GTC comparison to AEAD (I)

    Multiple candidate modes must be

    simulated

    Labels refer to the dominant poloidal

    harmonics driven by the synthetic

    antenna

    This signal is peaked between the two

    harmonics’ rational surfaces

    Closest match to the observed modes

    (red lines) in plasma-frame frequency

    and damping rate (n=6, m=5,6) is the

    best candidate to describe the

    observed mode

    | PAGE 20

  • Nicolas Fil, APS DPP 2018 – Poster | 05 November 2018

    GTC comparison to AEAD (II)

    Closest candidate modes from

    GTC have been matched to the

    AEAD measurements

    Uncertainty in damping rate

    arises from variability of the

    different coils

    Uncertainty in the frequency

    arises from uncertainty in plasma

    rotation

    Error bars denote rotation

    uncertainty based on

    spectroscopic plasma rotation

    measurements

    | PAGE 21

    [V. Aslanyan et al. submitted

    to Nuclear Fusion]

  • Nicolas Fil, APS DPP 2018 – Poster | 05 November 2018

    Ongoing work on the AEAD

    Improve the control of the antennas currents/voltages

    Improve the phase control between the antennas

    Enable the real-time tracking mode of the AEs

    Target specific antennas’ toroidal spectrum for AEs of interest.

    Measurements of damping rates of TAEs in plasmas with a variety of q-profiles and with

    the effects of fast ions from neutral beams and ICRH.

    Detection and measurements of low frequency modes, BAEs, BAAEs, GAMs and RSAEs

    | PAGE 22

    Magnetic signal from JPN 54895

    showing GAMs.

    Use of the 25 – 50 kHz filters

    to observe these modes on JET

    AELM can track and differentiate

    modes in real time

  • Nicolas Fil, APS DPP 2018 – Poster | 05 November 2018

    Future work, Modelling

    Extensive use will be made of the “antenna” version of GTC to determine the stability of

    predicted modes.

    Damping mechanisms will be identified by GTC simulations

    Extensive comparisons between GTC simulations and the existing codes CSCAS, MISHKA

    and CASTOR-K will be made.

    Simulations will be extended to lower frequency modes, such as BAEs BAAEs, and GAMs to

    form an important synergy with AEAD measurements.

    | PAGE 23

    Purely theoretical, not observed

    experimentally: EP-driven mode

    observed by changing the FI

    temperature

    Characteristic of BAE:

    • Single m harmonic and high

    growth rate, 𝜸/𝝎~𝟐𝟎%• f~40 kHz


Recommended