+ All Categories
Home > Documents > EGDE_CHINA_KTS_OCT_12th_2006_%2D_DAY3

EGDE_CHINA_KTS_OCT_12th_2006_%2D_DAY3

Date post: 02-Jun-2018
Category:
Upload: hosyphuoc
View: 220 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 38

Transcript
  • 8/11/2019 EGDE_CHINA_KTS_OCT_12th_2006_%2D_DAY3

    1/38

  • 8/11/2019 EGDE_CHINA_KTS_OCT_12th_2006_%2D_DAY3

    2/38

    2 Nortel Confidential Information

    AGENDA

    AGENDACore Engineering dimensioning tools

    BSCe3 capacity and dimensioning tool

    RF EGDE Radio Performance toolPCUSN capacity and Agprs dimensioning tool

    Nortel recommendations for EDGE deployment

    Backup slides

    October 12th

  • 8/11/2019 EGDE_CHINA_KTS_OCT_12th_2006_%2D_DAY3

    3/38

    3 Nortel Confidential Information

    AGENDA

    AGENDACore Engineering dimensioning tools

    BSCe3 capacity and dimensioning tool

    RF EGDE Radio Performance toolPCUSN capacity and Agprs dimensioning tool

    Nortel recommendations for EDGE deployment

    Backup slides

    October 12th

  • 8/11/2019 EGDE_CHINA_KTS_OCT_12th_2006_%2D_DAY3

    4/384 Nortel Confidential Information

    BSCe3 Capacity and Dimensioning Tools (1/4)

    > Internal BSCe3 capacity : allows to evaluate the TMU erlang capacity with a given callprofile> Internal BSCe3 dimensioning tool : allows to evaluate the appropriate number of Abis

    Agprs, Ater, A PCMs and the configuration of the BSce3, TCU and PCUSN.> Tool principle is presented below

    Dimensioningtool

    Dimensioning marginsDrop and insert ratio

    Agprs compression ratio

    Network configuration : l ist of all the sites(Nb cells, type, Nb TCH and PDTCH, nb Jokers, carried traffic)

    BSC constraints(TMU capacity, Max PCM, max config allowed, )

    ConfigurationBSCe3

    TCUPCUSN

  • 8/11/2019 EGDE_CHINA_KTS_OCT_12th_2006_%2D_DAY3

    5/385 Nortel Confidential Information

    BSCe3 Capacity and Dimensioning Tools (2/4)

    > For Voice call profile two approaches are possible: Voice call profile is well known and may be used directly as an input (customer call

    profile),

    Voice call profile is estimated from one of the three Nortel call profiles.

    > With this call profile, the capacity tool estimates the associated traffic load perTMU.

    > The dimensioning tool takes into consideration the following constraints: Dynamic Agprs : compression rate used TMU capacity : erlang max depending of the result of Capacity tool

    > The strongest constraint (for the considered case) determines the number ofBSCe3 for the given network configuration.

  • 8/11/2019 EGDE_CHINA_KTS_OCT_12th_2006_%2D_DAY3

    6/386 Nortel Confidential Information

    S222 S333 S444 O2 S222Block ing Rate A-I/F

    0.1% 6 9 12 2 6BSCe3 margin for carri ed traffic 10 16 30 3 10

    25% 3 3 3 1 3TCU, A & Ater dim m argin 1 1 2 1 1

    0% 1 3 3 1 1 Abis dim margin TCH/CELL #1 10 17 21 13 10

    0% TCH/CELL #2 14 21 21 0 10 Agprs dim margin TCH/CELL #3 14 21 29 0 140% pTCH/CELL #1 0 0 0 0 0

    GSM Call Profile pTCH/CELL #2 0 0 0 0 01 pTCH/CELL #3 0 0 0 0 0

    TMU1 capacity pTCH/CELL #1 4 4 8 1 4300 pTCH/CELL #2 0 0 8 0 4

    TMU2 capacity pTCH/CELL #3 0 0 0 0 0525 15 21 36 5 18

    SRT (8kRM) capacity in DS0 12 18 24 4 12

    4056 3 3 12 1 6Optical BSC capacity in DS012000 LEGEND

    Dynamic Agprs Gain TYPE YOUR VALUE50% FORMULA : DON'T TOUCH

    Drop&Insert Usage COMMENTS30% ASSISTANT

    # of DS0 on Abis E1 reserved

    0

    BSC1 5 2 2 15BSC2 60BSC3 100

    Configs

    TRX totalOffered Erlangs

    CellsE1 PCM

    DS0 "t raffic" (GSM/GPRS "c ombin ed")

    DS0 additional (EDGE)

    E D G E

    Lap-d

    G S M

    G P R S

    C S 1 - 2

    Total DS0 (64kbit/s)TS

    Standard

    BSC1 BSC2TMU1 7 10TMU2 0 0LSA 4 0HSA 2 2

    TMU1 red 2 2TMU2 red 0 0TMU1 SS7 2 2

    TMU2 SS7 0 0BSC Erl cap 2100 3000BSC LAPD cap 420 567

    BSCe3 TMU1 TMU2 LSA HSA TCUe3 TRM1 TRM2 LSA TCU2G PCUSN Abis PCM Agprs PCM Ater PCM A PCM Lb PCM

    1 14 0 0 2 2 4 8 6 0 1 67 5 20 79 0 921 11 0 4 2 1 0 7 4 0 1 112 14 14 51 0 1402 28 0 0 4 2 0 8 4 0 1 140 24 14 54 0 178

    Total PCM/ BSC

    Dimensioning marginsCall profileD&I usageGPRS compression ratio

    Network configuration

    Sites description And mapping on d if ferent BSC

    With the help of theassistant, define theBSC HW conf igurations

    Summary w ith

    PCM connectivit y andBSC, TCU HW conf igurations

    BSCe3 Capacity and Dimensioning Tools (3/4)

  • 8/11/2019 EGDE_CHINA_KTS_OCT_12th_2006_%2D_DAY3

    7/38

    7 Nortel Confidential Information

    BSCe3 capacity and Dimensioning Tool (4/4)

    > BSCe3 Capacity and Dimensioning tools examples through netmeeting :

    Tool available at this following link :

    http://navigate.us.nortel.com/imds?pg=/eng/wne/gsm/acc/pe/bsce3

    At this following entry :

    BSCe3 / TCUe3 Dimensioning tool V15.1, V15.1.1 and V16.0 (version 3.12)

    http://../Local%20Settings/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/OLKE4/EDGE_KTS_CHINA_Oct_10th_2006.ppthttp://../Local%20Settings/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/OLKE4/EDGE_KTS_CHINA_Oct_10th_2006.ppt
  • 8/11/2019 EGDE_CHINA_KTS_OCT_12th_2006_%2D_DAY3

    8/38

    8 Nortel Confidential Information

    AGENDA

    AGENDACore Engineering dimensioning tools

    BSCe3 capacity and dimensioning tool

    RF EGDE Radio Performance toolPCUSN capacity and Agprs dimensioning tool

    Nortel recommendations for EDGE deployment

    Backup slides

    October 12th

  • 8/11/2019 EGDE_CHINA_KTS_OCT_12th_2006_%2D_DAY3

    9/38

    9 Nortel Confidential Information

    RF EDGE Radio Performance tool (1/4)

    > Internal RF EDGE Radio performance tool allows to calculate the mean datathroughput per TS

    > Tool principle is presented below:

    Performancetool

    BLER =fc(C/N, MCS)

    Network characteristics(Env, Freq, Config, FH, IR )

    Radio constraints (interference, coverage)

    Mean data throughputThroughput with backhaul

  • 8/11/2019 EGDE_CHINA_KTS_OCT_12th_2006_%2D_DAY3

    10/38

  • 8/11/2019 EGDE_CHINA_KTS_OCT_12th_2006_%2D_DAY3

    11/38

    11 Nortel Confidential Information

    RF EDGE Radio Performance tool (3/4)

    (2) Mean throughput/TS

    (1) INPUTS OF THE TOOL : Freq, Env, FH, IR

    Maximum data Throughpu t

    vs cell position

    0

    1020

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    0,00 0,20 0,40 0,60 0,80 1,00 1,20 1,40 1,60 1,80 2,00 2,20 2,40 2,60Distance (km)

    M a x

    i m u m

    D a

    t a

    T h r o u g

    h p u

    t

    MCS-1 MCS-2MCS-3 MCS-4MCS-5 MCS-6

    MCS-7 MCS-8MCS-9 LA(3) Max Data ThroughputVs cell position

  • 8/11/2019 EGDE_CHINA_KTS_OCT_12th_2006_%2D_DAY3

    12/38

    12 Nortel Confidential Information

    RF EDGE Radio Performance tool (4/4)

    > RF EDGE Radio Performance tool example through net meeting :

    Tool available at this following link :

    http://navigate.us.nortel.com/imds?pg=/eng/wne/gsm/acc/pe/pcusn

    At this following entry :

    RF Edge Radio Performance and Abis Joker Dimensioning Tool

    http://navigate.us.nortel.com/imds?pg=/eng/wne/gsm/acc/pe/pcusnhttp://navigate.us.nortel.com/imds?pg=/eng/wne/gsm/acc/pe/pcusn
  • 8/11/2019 EGDE_CHINA_KTS_OCT_12th_2006_%2D_DAY3

    13/38

    13 Nortel Confidential Information

    AGENDA

    AGENDACore Engineering dimensioning tools

    BSCe3 capacity and dimensioning tool

    RF EGDE Radio Performance toolPCUSN capacity and Agprs dimensioning tool

    Nortel recommendations for EDGE deployment

    Backup slides

    October 12th

  • 8/11/2019 EGDE_CHINA_KTS_OCT_12th_2006_%2D_DAY3

    14/38

    14 Nortel Confidential Information

    PCUSN and Dynamic Agprs Dimensioning tool (1/4)

    > Internal PCUSN and Dynamic Agprs dimensioning tool allows to evaluate theappropriate number of Agprs PCM.

    > Tool principle is presented below:

    Dimensioningtool

    Data call profi le

    Network characteristics(Nb cells, Data usage, Nb PDTCH, etc)

    PCU and BSC constraints(SPM capacity, Max Agprs nb msg, )

    Number of Agprs PCM

  • 8/11/2019 EGDE_CHINA_KTS_OCT_12th_2006_%2D_DAY3

    15/38

    15 Nortel Confidential Information

    PCUSN and Dynamic Agprs Dimensioning tool (2/4)

    > For Data call profile two approaches are possible: Data call profile is well known and may be used directly as an input, Data call profile is estimated from some BSS counters.

    > With this call profile, the tool estimates the associated traffic load persubscriber and so per cell.

    > The dimensioning tool takes into consideration the following constraints: Dynamic Agprs algorithm reactivity when some compression is possible,

    (with minimum impact on user throughput)

    SPM capacity Max Nb of SUB:

    40 MS or 80 MS ( not valid from V15.0 ) or max CPU load:

    87,5 % CPU load before overload mechanism ( new limitation from V15.0 )

    Max nb of msg on LAPD per Agprs GSL Data Link: (Max of 24 msg/sec if CCCH@BTS is activated)

    > The strongest constraint (for the considered case) determines the number ofcells that may be mapped per Agprs PCM. This provides the value of N.

  • 8/11/2019 EGDE_CHINA_KTS_OCT_12th_2006_%2D_DAY3

    16/38

    16 Nortel Confidential Information

    PCUSN and Dynamic Agprs Dimensioning Tool (3/4)

    (2) Capture backhauldimensioning & # PDTCH

    What is desired MCS usage distribution?

    MCS Distribution + PDTCH specificationsdetermine #JokerDS0s needed per cell

    (1) Quantify Data Call profile

    (3) Calculate the AGPRS compressionrate and the number of links

    (4) Capture all decisions via CIQ Assumptions Summary :

  • 8/11/2019 EGDE_CHINA_KTS_OCT_12th_2006_%2D_DAY3

    17/38

    17 Nortel Confidential Information

    PCUSN and Dynamic Agprs Dimensioning Tool (4/4)

    > PCUSN capacity and dimensioning tool example through net meeting :

    Tool available at this following link :

    http://navigate.us.nortel.com/imds?pg=/eng/wne/gsm/acc/pe/pcusn

    At this following entry :

    PCUSN and Dyn Agprs Dim tool (V2.02)

    http://navigate.us.nortel.com/imds?pg=/eng/wne/gsm/acc/pe/pcusnhttp://navigate.us.nortel.com/imds?pg=/eng/wne/gsm/acc/pe/pcusn
  • 8/11/2019 EGDE_CHINA_KTS_OCT_12th_2006_%2D_DAY3

    18/38

    18 Nortel Confidential Information

    The PCUSN in GPRS/EDGE network

    Hardware Description

    PCUSN Engineering view

    AGENDA

    AGENDACore Engineering dimensioning tools

    Nortel recommendations for EDGEdeployment

    EDGE performance BCCH/FH comparisonEDGE performance vs. RxLev

    EDGE BackhaulEDGE MCS selection

    Backup slides

    October 12th

  • 8/11/2019 EGDE_CHINA_KTS_OCT_12th_2006_%2D_DAY3

    19/38

    19 Nortel Confidential Information

    DL BCCH versus FH Data performance compariso n

    40

    45

    50

    55

    60

    65

    70

    75

    80

    -90 -85 -80 -75 -70 -65 -60

    RxLev [dBm]

    D a t a T h o r u g h p u

    t [ K b i t / s ]

    BCCH DL Live Applicatif

    FH DL Live Applicatif

    25% 15%

    3%

    EDGE BCCH/FH Comparison

    UL BCCH versus FH Data Performance

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    40

    -85 -80 -75 -70 -65 -60

    RxLev [dBm]

    D a t a T h o r u g h p u t [ K b

    i t / s ]

    BCCH UL Live Applicatif

    FH ULLive Applicatif

    15%10%

    In worst performance environment, data performances on

    Hopping layer can be degraded by 25%UL data performances are less impacted than DL

    >> Test condition:Test condition: BCCH 4/12,Urban cell; 4 hoppingBCCH 4/12,Urban cell; 4 hoppingDRX with 33% Frequency load; BH with 50% TCHDRX with 33% Frequency load; BH with 50% TCHoccupancy; Trace MS in 2+1occupancy; Trace MS in 2+1

  • 8/11/2019 EGDE_CHINA_KTS_OCT_12th_2006_%2D_DAY3

    20/38

    20 Nortel Confidential Information

    DL Usage Distr ibu tio n BCCH versus FH at -75dBm

    0,00%

    10,00%

    20,00%

    30,00%

    40,00%

    50,00%

    60,00%

    70,00%

    80,00%

    D L_ T_

    T T_ M C

    S 2_ U S

    D L_ T_

    T T_ M C

    S 3_ U S

    D L_ T_

    T T_ M C

    S 5_ U S

    D L_ T_

    T T_ M C

    S 6_ U S

    D L_ T_

    T T_ M C

    S 7_ U S

    D L_ T_

    T T_ M C

    S 8_ U S

    D L_ T_

    T T_ M C

    S 9_ U S

    Codec Targetted and Transmi tted

    U s a g e [ ]

    BCCH

    FH

    EDGE BCCH/FH Comparison: at -75dBm

    DL BLER Evolutio n BCCH versu s FH at -75dBm

    0,00%

    5,00%

    10,00%

    15,00%

    20,00%

    25,00%

    30,00%

    35,00%

    40,00%

    D L_ R A D

    I O_ B L

    E R_ M

    D L_ R A D

    I O_ B L

    E R_ M

    D L_ R A D

    I O_ B L

    E R_ M

    D L_ R A D

    I O_ B L

    E R_ M

    D L_ R A D

    I O_ B L

    E R_ M

    D L_ R A D

    I O_ B L

    E R_ M

    D L_ R A D

    I O_ B L

    E R_ M

    Codec Targetted and Transmitt ed

    B L E R [ ]

    BCCH

    FH

    DL MCS distribution changes between BCCH and FHDL BLER per MCS is higher in FH than BCCH

    d

  • 8/11/2019 EGDE_CHINA_KTS_OCT_12th_2006_%2D_DAY3

    21/38

    21 Nortel Confidential Information

    UL Codec Usage Distribution BCCH versus FH at -75dBm

    0,00%

    10,00%

    20,00%

    30,00%

    40,00%

    50,00%

    60,00%

    70,00%

    80,00%

    90,00%

    100,00%

    U L_ T_

    T T_ M

    C S 2_ U

    S A

    U L_ T_

    T T_ M

    C S 3_ U

    S A

    U L_ T_

    T T_ M

    C S 5_ U

    S A

    U L_ T_

    T T_ M

    C S 6_ U

    S A

    U L_ T_

    T T_ M

    C S 7_ U

    S A

    U L_ T_

    T T_ M

    C S 8_ U

    S A

    U L_ T_

    T T_ M

    C S 9_ U

    S A

    Codec Targetted and Transmitted

    U s a g e [ % ]

    BCCH

    FH

    Same behavior as DL for UL MCS distr ibution andUL BLER per MCS between BCCH and FH

    UL BLER Evoluti on BCCH versus FH at -75dBm

    0,00%

    5,00%

    10,00%

    15,00%

    20,00%

    25,00%

    30,00%

    35,00%

    40,00%

    U L_ R A D

    I O_ B L

    E R_ M

    C

    U L_ R A D

    I O_ B L

    E R_ M

    C

    U L_ R A D

    I O_ B L

    E R_ M

    C

    U L_ R A D

    I O_ B L

    E R_ M

    C

    U L_ R A D

    I O_ B L

    E R_ M

    C

    U L_ R A D

    I O_ B L

    E R_ M

    C

    U L_ R A D

    I O_ B L

    E R_ M

    C

    B L E R [ % ]

    BCCH

    FH

    EDGE BCCH/FH Comparison: at -75dBm

  • 8/11/2019 EGDE_CHINA_KTS_OCT_12th_2006_%2D_DAY3

    22/38

    22 Nortel Confidential Information

    DL FTP throughput better than 100 kbps is guaranteeup to -90 dBm for DL RxLev

    DL FTP Throughput v s. DL RxLev

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    160

    180

    200

    -102 -100 -98 -96 -94 -92 -90 -88 -86 -84 -82

    RxLev (dBm)

    F T P D L T h r o u

    g h p u

    t ( K b p s )

    EDGE Performance vs. RxLev

    Test performedin interference free

    environmentwith MS 4+2

  • 8/11/2019 EGDE_CHINA_KTS_OCT_12th_2006_%2D_DAY3

    23/38

    23 Nortel Confidential Information

    Av erag e Nb Ab is Jo ker 16k TS M is si ng & % t im e L ac ki ng Ab is Jo ker 16k TS

    0

    0,2

    0,4

    0,6

    0,8

    1

    1,2

    1,4

    1,6

    1,8

    2

    2,2

    2,4

    2,6

    2,8

    3

    3,2

    3,4

    3,6

    3,84

    4DSO 3DSO 2DSONumber of ABIS DSO Available

    A v

    g .

    # M i s s i n g A B I S J o k e r s 1 6 k b p s T S

    0,00%

    5,00%

    10,00%

    15,00%

    20,00%

    25,00%

    30,00%

    35,00%

    40,00%

    45,00%

    50,00%

    55,00%

    60,00%

    65,00%

    70,00%

    % t

    i m e L a c k i n g A B I S

    J o k e r 1 6 k b p s T S

    AVG _NB_ ABIS _JO KER_ TS_ MISS ING LACK _ABI S_JO KER _TS_ TIM E_RA TIO

    EDGE Backhaul: Abis

    Test performedwith 2 MS 2+1

    making medium& big transfers

    Avg. Th ro ug hp ut vs . AB IS DS O Av ai lab le

    50

    55

    60

    65

    70

    75

    4DSO 3DSO 2DSONumber of ABIS DSO Available

    A v

    g .

    T h r o u

    g h p u

    t ( k b p s )

    Drive test DL 1MB

    Drive test DL 250KB

    EDGE_AVG_DL_THROUGHPUT

    20% Throughput loss from4DS0 to 2 DS0

    Medium file transfers areless impacted

  • 8/11/2019 EGDE_CHINA_KTS_OCT_12th_2006_%2D_DAY3

    24/38

    24 Nortel Confidential Information

    MCS Usage VS Available AB IS DSO

    0,0%

    5,0%

    10,0%

    15,0%

    20,0%

    25,0%

    30,0%

    35,0%

    40,0%

    4DSO 3DSO 2DSO

    Number o f ABIS DSO Available

    M C

    S U s a g e

    DL_EDGE_MCS_2_USAGEDL_EDGE_MCS_3_USAGEDL_EDGE_MCS_5_USAGEDL_EDGE_MCS_6_USAGE

    DL_EDGE_MCS_7_USAGEDL_EDGE_MCS_8_USAGEDL_EDGE_MCS_9_USAGE

    EDGE Backhaul: Abis

    High MCS2 usage with 2 DS0 configuration

  • 8/11/2019 EGDE_CHINA_KTS_OCT_12th_2006_%2D_DAY3

    25/38

    25 Nortel Confidential Information

    >> Global PCMGlobal PCM OccupancyOccupancy

    Agprs: First field test result

    DL_T1_PCM_Occupancy

    0%

    5%

    10%

    15%

    20%

    25%

    30%

    2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

    Time (hour )

    O c c u p a n c y

    R a

    t e ( % )

    4% - 2020% - 20

    40% - 2060% - 20

    70% - 20

    80% - 2080% - 6080% - 100

    Additional Data Trafficcreated during BH

    Compression >40%

    Compression 40%

    PCM_Occupancy increases and reachs a peak value during the

    tests timeframe, as expected.Fast PCM_Occupancy increase above 40% of compression rate

  • 8/11/2019 EGDE_CHINA_KTS_OCT_12th_2006_%2D_DAY3

    26/38

    26 Nortel Confidential Information

    DYN_AGPRS_NB_MODIFICATION_REQUEST_RATIO

    0.0007 0.0027 0.0154

    0.1817

    0.7226

    0.9855 0.9894 0.9603

    0%

    10%

    20%

    30%40%

    50%

    60%

    70%

    80%90%

    100%

    4% - 20 20% - 20 40% - 20 60% - 20 70% - 20 80% - 20 80% - 60 80% - 100 Agprs Compression Rate (%) - AgprsFil terCoefficient

    R a

    t i o

    ( % )

    Agprs modification requests are maximal with 80% compression rate.

    With 70% compression rate, there is a margin of 27% in term ofmodification requests number

    >> Number Number of of Agprs Modification Agprs Modification requestrequest

    Low usage of dyn. agprs High usage of dyn. agprs

    27%

    Maximum of 1 Agprs modi ficat ionrequest per second

    EDGE Backhaul: Agprs

  • 8/11/2019 EGDE_CHINA_KTS_OCT_12th_2006_%2D_DAY3

    27/38

    27 Nortel Confidential Information

    EDGE MCS selection:Initial MCS

    Init ial MCS UL&DL set to 5 is a good compromiseFor urban cell, an aggressive setting to 7 will

    give better performances

    Ping 56 Bytes / Avg RTD in ms

    800

    850

    900

    950

    1000

    1050

    1100

    IMCS UL 2/DL 5 IMCS UL 2/DL 7 IMCS UL 5/DL 5 IMCS UL 5/DL 7

    Suburban Cell Urban CellPing 1400 Bytes / Avg RTD in ms

    1000

    1200

    1400

    1600

    1800

    2000

    2200

    2400

    2600

    IMCS UL 2/DL 5 IMCS UL 2/DL 7 IMCS UL 5/DL 5 IMCS UL 5/DL 7

    Suburban Cell Urban Cell

    l

  • 8/11/2019 EGDE_CHINA_KTS_OCT_12th_2006_%2D_DAY3

    28/38

    28 Nortel Confidential Information

    Use each MCS in its optimum range (C/I; BLER)MAXIMIZE THROUGHPUT

    METHODOLOGY

    By monitoring the repartition of LA targeted transmitted MCS and theBLER per MCS

    0 5 10 15 20 25 30 350

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    MCS2MCS3MCS5MCS6MCS7MCS8MCS9

    Throughput=f(C /I) URBAN IFH

    C/I

    T h r o u g

    h p u

    t ( k b / s )

    C/I

    TheoreticalRadio Environment

    (TU / HT / RA)First set of

    thresholdsOptimization with real live

    environment

    R&DSimulations

    EDGE MCS selection:Link Adaptation

    EDGE MCS l i

  • 8/11/2019 EGDE_CHINA_KTS_OCT_12th_2006_%2D_DAY3

    29/38

    29 Nortel Confidential Information

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 310

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    mcs1mcs2mcs3mcs5mcs6mcs7mcs8mcs9

    UPLINK TU 3km/h 1900 NFH

    Mean BEP 8PSK

    T h r o u g

    h p u

    t ( k b / s )

    First set of

    thresholds

    Simulations

    ulMCS2UpperThreshold=32ulMCS3UpperThreshold=48ulMCS5UpperThreshold=72ulMCS6UpperThreshold=128ulMCS7UpperThreshold=152

    ulMCS8UpperThreshold=184

    First set of thresholds were coming from R&D simulationOptimization have been done on field to have

    Live recommended thresholds

    EDGE MCS selection:Link Adaptation

  • 8/11/2019 EGDE_CHINA_KTS_OCT_12th_2006_%2D_DAY3

    30/38

    30 Nortel Confidential Information

    Targeted Transmitted MCS repartition

    0,0%

    10,0%

    20,0%

    30,0%

    40,0%

    50,0%

    60,0%

    70,0%

    D L_ T A R

    G E T E

    D_ T R

    A N S M

    I T T E D

    _ M C S

    2_ U

    D L_ T A R

    G E T E

    D_ T R

    A N S M

    I T T E D

    _ M C S

    3_ U

    D L_ T A R

    G E T E

    D_ T R

    A N S M

    I T T E D

    _ M C S

    5_ U

    D L_ T A R

    G E T E

    D_ T R

    A N S M

    I T T E D

    _ M C S

    6_ U

    D L_ T A R

    G E T E

    D_ T R

    A N S M

    I T T E D

    _ M C S

    7_ U

    D L_ T A R

    G E T E

    D_ T R

    A N S M

    I T T E D

    _ M C S

    8_ U

    D L_ T A R

    G E T E

    D_ T R

    A N S M

    I T T E D

    _ M C S

    9_ U

    Default tabletable 1

    table 2

    table 3

    table 4

    table 5

    BLER per MCS

    0,00%

    10,00%

    20,00%

    30,00%

    40,00%

    50,00%

    60,00%

    70,00%

    D L_ R

    A D I O_

    B L E R

    _ M C

    D L_ R A D

    I O_ B L

    E R_ M

    C

    D L_ R

    A D I O_

    B L E R

    _ M C

    D L_ R A D

    I O_ B L

    E R_ M

    C

    D L_ R A D

    I O_ B L

    E R_ M

    C

    D L_ R A D

    I O_ B L

    E R_ M

    C

    D L_ R

    A D I O_

    B L E R

    _ M C

    Default table

    table 1table 2

    table 3

    table 4

    table 5

    Link Adaptation: DL MCS & BLER

    From conservative setting (MCS 5&7 usage) we moved toa better high MCS usage while keeping good BLER

    Better high MCS usage

    First MCS usage

    Keeping good BLER value

  • 8/11/2019 EGDE_CHINA_KTS_OCT_12th_2006_%2D_DAY3

    31/38

    31 Nortel Confidential Information

    Throughput evolution v s. LA table

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    LA table default LA table1 LA table2 LA table3 LA table4 LA table5

    T h r o u

    g h p u

    t [ K b p s ]

    Drive test Avg Kbps (FTP) DL

    Counters Avg Kbps (RLC) DLDrive test Avg Kbps (FTP) ULCounters Avg Kbps (RLC) UL

    Optimization can be done in few steps by monitoringBLER and modifying thresholds in the LA table

    Link Adaptation: throughput

  • 8/11/2019 EGDE_CHINA_KTS_OCT_12th_2006_%2D_DAY3

    32/38

    32 Nortel Confidential Information

    Recommendations/Conclusion

    EDGE increases Customer Satisfaction andNetwork Capacity: EDGE provides 2.5 x throughput than GPRS Higher throughput offered to data users for new services

    Nortels EDGE solution allows tuning facilitiesthat maximizing EDGE Throughput: Initial MCS LA table Dynamic Agprs

    Nortel EDGE is successfully deployed on severalcommercial networks

  • 8/11/2019 EGDE_CHINA_KTS_OCT_12th_2006_%2D_DAY3

    33/38

    33 Nortel Confidential Information

    AGENDACore Engineering Dimensioning tools

    Nortel recommendations for EDGE deployment

    Backup slides

    October 12th

  • 8/11/2019 EGDE_CHINA_KTS_OCT_12th_2006_%2D_DAY3

    34/38

  • 8/11/2019 EGDE_CHINA_KTS_OCT_12th_2006_%2D_DAY3

    35/38

    35 Nortel Confidential Information

    Backup Slides (2/4)

    Core Engineering documents for V15.1.1 related to EDGE

    BSS Interface :

    Agprs Interface Engineering Rules - V15.1.1 Standard A and Ater Engineering Rules - V15.1.1 - standardRadio Interface Engineering Rules - V15.1.1 - Standard

    Abis Interface Engineering Rules - V15.1.1 - Standardhttp://navigate.us.nortel.com/imds?pg=/eng/wne/gsm/acc/pe/bss

    Memo :

    Dynamic Agprs Dimensioning Memo - Release 2.2http://navigate.us.nortel.com/imds?pg=/eng/wne/gsm/acc/pe/pcusn

    Engineering Tests Plan :

    V15.1 Engineering Test Plan Result (internal)V15.1 Engineering Test Plan Report (internal)

    http://navigate.us.nortel.com/imds?pg=/eng/wne/gsm/acc/po/app/v151

    B k Slid (3/4)

    http://../Local%20Settings/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/OLKE4/EDGE_KTS_CHINA_Oct_12th_2006.ppthttp://navigate.us.nortel.com/imds?pg=/eng/wne/gsm/acc/pe/pcusnhttp://navigate.us.nortel.com/imds?pg=/eng/wne/gsm/acc/po/app/v151http://navigate.us.nortel.com/imds?pg=/eng/wne/gsm/acc/po/app/v151http://navigate.us.nortel.com/imds?pg=/eng/wne/gsm/acc/pe/pcusnhttp://../Local%20Settings/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/OLKE4/EDGE_KTS_CHINA_Oct_12th_2006.ppt
  • 8/11/2019 EGDE_CHINA_KTS_OCT_12th_2006_%2D_DAY3

    36/38

    36 Nortel Confidential Information

    Backup Slides (3/4)Core Engineering documents for V15.1.1 related to EDGE

    Performance :GSM/GPRS/EDGE Access: Metrics for Baseline V15.1.1GPRS-EDGE Metrics for V15.1monitoring V07.06 (internal)Impact on GSM GPRS EDGE Monitoring for V15.1.1

    http://navigate.us.nortel.com/imds?pg=/eng/wne/gsm/acc/po/lm

    EDGE Engineering Handbookhttp://livelink-eur.europe.nortel.com/livelink/livelink.exe?func=ll&objId=17025439&objAction=browse

    GPRS/EDGE Monitoring Guidelineshttp://eurlivelink.europe.nortel.com/livelink/livelink.exe/fetch/2000/16011614/2907303/2969832/6314294/6568640/6568962/26935711/PE_IRC_APP_020317_V01_EN_GPRS_EDGE_Monitor ing_Guidelines.pdf ?nodeid=26939651&vernum=0

    V15.14 Access (EGPRS) Parameters User Guide - APUGhttp://navigate.us.nortel.com/imds?pg=/eng/wne/gsm/acc/po/fp/accpug

    BSS Parameters User Guide V15.1.1 (Standard 15.12) - BPUGhttp://navigate.us.nortel.com/imds?pg=/eng/wne/gsm/acc/po/fp/bsspug

    Link to the Library for metrics and tech notes associated to V15.1.1http://eurlivelink.europe.nortel.com/livelink/livelink.exe?func=ll&objId=18834415&objAction=browse

    http://navigate.us.nortel.com/imds?pg=/eng/wne/gsm/acc/po/lmhttp://livelink-eur.europe.nortel.com/livelink/livelink.exe?func=ll&objId=17025439&objAction=browsehttp://eurlivelink.europe.nortel.com/livelink/livelink.exe/fetch/2000/16011614/2907303/2969832/6314294/6568640/6568962/26935711/PE_IRC_APP_020317_V01_EN_GPRS_EDGE_Monitoring_Guidelines.pdf?nodeid=26939651&vernum=0http://eurlivelink.europe.nortel.com/livelink/livelink.exe/fetch/2000/16011614/2907303/2969832/6314294/6568640/6568962/26935711/PE_IRC_APP_020317_V01_EN_GPRS_EDGE_Monitoring_Guidelines.pdf?nodeid=26939651&vernum=0http://eurlivelink.europe.nortel.com/livelink/livelink.exe/fetch/2000/16011614/2907303/2969832/6314294/6568640/6568962/26935711/PE_IRC_APP_020317_V01_EN_GPRS_EDGE_Monitoring_Guidelines.pdf?nodeid=26939651&vernum=0http://navigate.us.nortel.com/imds?pg=/eng/wne/gsm/acc/po/fp/accpughttp://navigate.us.nortel.com/imds?pg=/eng/wne/gsm/acc/po/fp/bsspughttp://eurlivelink.europe.nortel.com/livelink/livelink.exe?func=ll&objId=18834415&objAction=browsehttp://eurlivelink.europe.nortel.com/livelink/livelink.exe?func=ll&objId=18834415&objAction=browsehttp://navigate.us.nortel.com/imds?pg=/eng/wne/gsm/acc/po/fp/bsspughttp://navigate.us.nortel.com/imds?pg=/eng/wne/gsm/acc/po/fp/accpughttp://eurlivelink.europe.nortel.com/livelink/livelink.exe/fetch/2000/16011614/2907303/2969832/6314294/6568640/6568962/26935711/PE_IRC_APP_020317_V01_EN_GPRS_EDGE_Monitoring_Guidelines.pdf?nodeid=26939651&vernum=0http://eurlivelink.europe.nortel.com/livelink/livelink.exe/fetch/2000/16011614/2907303/2969832/6314294/6568640/6568962/26935711/PE_IRC_APP_020317_V01_EN_GPRS_EDGE_Monitoring_Guidelines.pdf?nodeid=26939651&vernum=0http://eurlivelink.europe.nortel.com/livelink/livelink.exe/fetch/2000/16011614/2907303/2969832/6314294/6568640/6568962/26935711/PE_IRC_APP_020317_V01_EN_GPRS_EDGE_Monitoring_Guidelines.pdf?nodeid=26939651&vernum=0http://livelink-eur.europe.nortel.com/livelink/livelink.exe?func=ll&objId=17025439&objAction=browsehttp://navigate.us.nortel.com/imds?pg=/eng/wne/gsm/acc/po/lm
  • 8/11/2019 EGDE_CHINA_KTS_OCT_12th_2006_%2D_DAY3

    37/38

    37 Nortel Confidential Information

    Backup Slides (4/4)

  • 8/11/2019 EGDE_CHINA_KTS_OCT_12th_2006_%2D_DAY3

    38/38