+ All Categories
Home > Documents > eHealth Innovation in support of the EIP: barriers and...

eHealth Innovation in support of the EIP: barriers and...

Date post: 17-Mar-2018
Category:
Upload: vohanh
View: 217 times
Download: 3 times
Share this document with a friend
31
2nd eHealth Innovation Workshop Integrated care, patient empowerment & co-production of health World of Health IT Congress, Copenhagen, May 2012 Dipak Kalra Jörg Artmann eHealth Innovation in support of the EIP: barriers and enablers for patient empowerment
Transcript

2nd eHealth Innovation Workshop

Integrated care, patient empowerment & co-production of health

World of Health IT Congress, Copenhagen, May 2012

Dipak Kalra

Jörg Artmann

eHealth Innovation in support of the

EIP: barriers and enablers for patient

empowerment

Workshop agenda: first half

Workshop agenda: second half

Introduction: what we promised at the

beginning of eHealth Innovation

• Europe needs more person-centred health

services

- motivate and support people in caring for their own health

status

- engage and support health professionals, service providers

and other stakeholders

• This requires

- synthesising evidence from good practice examples,

learning from their success factors

- defining a realistic and high impact vision for person centred

services and person empowerment in health production

- proposing value propositions and business models

- identifying strategic steps at policy, organisational,

legislative and technical levels: a roadmap

Outline of this presentation

• Introduction: patient empowerment focus in the

EIP

• Case study material collected by the eHealth

Innovation project

• Some lessons learned on scaling-up local good

practice

• eHealth innovation as a political challenge:

lessons from a German Marshall Fund

symposium

• Conclusion

Patient empowerment as the new

paradigm for ageing in the EIP

• Ageing should be perceived as „a positive vision

which values older people and their contribution

to society; their empowerment to influence and

benefit from user-centred innovation in active

and healthy ageing.”

• Three priority action areas: “Improving

effectiveness of clinical outcomes through

improved health literacy, patient empowerment,

ethics and adherence programmes (A1)”

Patient empowerment as a strategic

pillar of the EIP operational plan

How does patient empowerment

translate to health services?

• The eHealth innovation project has collected

case study material from its partners and

publicly available sources

• Guided by a structured template

• All of the cases focus on the special needs of

elderly citizens with chronic conditions or other

impairements

Some examples of application areas

• eCaalyx project: Health monitoring of older and elderly persons with multiple chronic conditions, at home and on the move

• Prevent deterioration of the patient condition by providing continuous support, guidance, and relevant health education.

• eCAALYX is composed of three main subsystems - The Home Subsystem, which includes Customer Premises

Equipment (CPE), Set-top-box (STB)/interactive TV (to deliver health education and other functions), Tricorder and home sensors (those sensors that are stationary and not continuously worn on the body), all of them located at home;

- The Mobile Subsystem, which includes a ―smart‖garment, with all sensors integrated into a wireless BAN—Wearable Body Sensors (WBS), and a mobile phone;

- The Caretaker Site, which includes the Caretaker Server and the Auto-configuration Server.

Nexes project: facilitating cross-sectoral

care for the elderly

• University hospital Barcelona at the core

• Deploying four integrated care programs for chronic patients based on structured interventions addressing prevention, healthcare and social support.

• ICT enabled care platform provides: - Health portal,

- Call centre service,

- Professional mobile access,

- Patient wireless monitoring service,

- Collaborative work service,

- Security modules

- Interoperability module with hospital information systems and shared electronic patient records.

Sotiria hospital: providing ICT enabled

rehabilitation services

The hospital has deployed a number of services:

• Two-way real time interactive video and voice to allow the patient to electronically meet face to face with a nurse or doctor on a scheduled or on emergency basis.

• Real-time transmission of patients’ vital signs (ECG, electronic stethoscope, spirometry, oximetry, blood glucose, weight, blood pressure), which are automatically collected and logged into patient’s

• Medical Health Record, located in the central database of the Unit. The control of the database is conducted by a management system, which is supported by specifically designed medical expert systems.

• Continuous monitoring of biosignals through the use of innovative, non-invasive wearable systems that allow transmission of ECG, heart and respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, activity and body position.

• Intelligent Internet access to electronic libraries, via the management system, for automatic retrieval of medical information related to patients’ diseases.

Some lessons learned from cases

• Build on predecessor structures or projects to

expand promising approaches further (eCaalyx

was preceded by Caalyx)

• Rely on medical leadership and experience

(Nexes)

• Build solutions based on a medical and social

service vision and NOT around a promising

technology (Sotiria)

• Both NEXES and Sotiria rely on shared access to

an electronic patient record

• Consider the upscaling from pilot to running

service already in the project design

Strategic insights from a GMF

symposium

• EU-US memorandum of understanding

surrounding “surrounding health related

information and communication technologies” in

2010

• In November 2011, the German Marshall Fund of

the United States (GMF) and the U.S. Mission to

the EU gathered in Brussels a small high-level

group of experts from both sides of the Atlantic,

policy makers, academics, and private sector

representatives, to produce a set of concrete

policy recommendations on innovation and

healthcare.

Key recommendations from the German

Marshall Fund on eHealth innovation (1)

1. Business models for healthcare services must be adapted to better encourage efforts towards having healthy citizens and good clinical outcomes that are aligned between payers/insurers and providers.

2. New reimbursement models must be designed and effected to give preferential return for investments in sharing care with patients and for richer empowerment services (focusing on long term conditions).

3. Codes of professional practice need to be developed for high quality patient education and support of self-care and health promotion, which must be endorsed by professional bodies and professional insurers to give confidence across all stakeholder groups.

4. Codes of practice and legal clarification of accountability are needed for care organisations and individual practitioners receiving and using patient provided health information.

Key recommendations from the German

Marshall Fund on eHealth innovation (2)

5. Procurement guidance is required for regional level organisations to encourage more interoperable and standards based eHealth solutions.

6. Investments are needed in education of the clinical workforce and of society in the use of health IT, in supporting self-care, and how the public can critically assess Internet resources.

7. Investment is needed into evaluations (including standardised metrics) to better demonstrate evidence of clinical and economic outcomes, and containment of risk, from self--management and patient empowerment eHealth solutions.

8. Strong leadership is needed to actively champion relevant initiatives that accelerate the adoption of eHealth innovations.

SLIDE ARCHIVE from 1st Workshop in Budapest

EC workshop on chronic disease management for an ageing population:

good practice and innovative solutions

World of Health IT Congress, Budapest, May 2011

Dipak Kalra

Veli Stroetmann

Towards a European roadmap for

sustained eHealth Innovation

eHealth Innovation context

• Existing models of health care services are

unsustainable (rising needs and costs)

• e.g. rising incidence of chronic diseases and increased complexity

of their treatment

• Need for better integration across wellness, health care,

public health, occupational health & social care

• Need to harness the immense contributions that patients

and citizens can make in:

• managing their own health and conditions

• preventing illness

• promoting well-being

Changing roles and relationships

Personalised health services and Infostructure

• Focus on prevention and support of patient self-care and

life style management

• Improve management of long term conditions

• virtual teams

• close to home and ambulatory health services

• person-centric information capture and delivery

• patient-tailored knowledge at the point of decision making

• Share power and responsibility with patients

• co-production of health

Strategic success factors

• Policy, organisational, insurance and reimbursement

changes

• Attitude and culture changes

• Ethical considerations

• Educational of professionals, managers, patients and

health citizens

• Willingness to share decision making and responsibility

with patients

• Willingness to collaborate with social care, domiciliary

care, health charities, complementary therapists,

families, workplaces, social networks

Objectives of eHealth Innovation

• Analyse, achieve consensus on and prepare a detailed eHealth

Innovation Roadmap on medium-term practical steps towards

more patient/person-centred health services

• Analyse, achieve consensus on how this can be facilitated by

innovative eHealth solutions and services – in particular

electronic health records (EHR), personal health records (PHR)

and personal health systems (PHS)

• Prepare the Roadmap with the clear aim to support and

empower patients in managing their health

• Define the resulting needs and requirements for a supporting

ICT infra- and infostructure

• Articulate efficiently further development, innovation and large

scale deployment measures as perceived by various

stakeholder and expert groups

Overall strategy

eHealth Innovation Partners

UCL Consultants Royal College of Physicians

empirica European Connected Health

Campus

Klinisk Informatik University of Sheffield

EuroRec AOK Rheinland/Hamburg

Continua Health Alliance Government of Catalonia HTA

Agency

University of Manchester Czech National eHealth Forum

National Institute of Public Health EHTEL

Republic of Slovenia COCIR

French Ministry of Health Universitat Pompeu Fabra

Dutch Association for Primary and Health Consumer Powerhouse

Integrated Healthcare University Hospitals of Geneva

County Council of Uppsala F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG

WP1: Chronic disease management for an ageing

population

• Identify good practice and innovative solutions

• Examine models of cooperation between patient and

health professionals

• patient access to his/her health data

• improved information sharing, decision-sharing and care co-

ordination

• Formulate recommendations for large scale

deployments based on good practice examples

• drivers

• barriers and mitigations

• success factors, including incentives

WP2: Personalised health services and patient centred

care

• Define distinct and concrete patient/citizen engagement

scenarios, focusing on older and frail patients

• Prioritise those of greatest feasibility and impact

• Examine legal and regulatory issues, public policy,

health technology assessment, business models

• Encapsulate the European vision, culture, goals and

objectives for patient-centred healthcare

• Personal Health Systems (PHS), Personal Guidance Systems

(PGS)

• Chronic disease management (CDM) and integrated care (IC)

WP3: Patient empowerment systems and solutions

• Identify key success factors for establishing patient

online portals and patient access to their health

information

• Examine the determining factors for patients to be co-

producers of health in a societal and organisational

context

• Define value-creation models of the

co-production paradigm

• Define possible eco-system architectures of

co-production

• Analyse data, information and knowledge flows needed

for PGS integration with PHS and PHR

WP4: EU-wide eHealth infostructure

• Aim to build on existing national infrastructures

• Support scenarios for patient care,

self-management, health education, public health, health

research

• Infostructure challenges:

• semantic interoperability

• advanced EHR based solutions

• infrastructure and interfaces

• knowledge generation (e.g. from patient monitoring)

• feedback to patients (and doctors)

• data re-use

WP5: European roadmap for realising personalised health

services

• A framework of axes and axis values reflecting

orthogonal perspectives on the eHealth Innovation

challenge

• Strategic steps, policy ingredients, actions, mile-stones

and outcomes

• including specific guidelines, for the large scale deployment of

innovative eHealth services

• derived from WP 1-4

The ehealth Innovation landscape


Recommended