+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Elastic pp scattering, A N and r 5

Elastic pp scattering, A N and r 5

Date post: 11-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: xuxa
View: 33 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Elastic pp scattering, A N and r 5. Mostly stuff shown in the previous pp2pp/STAR meetings A little bit about the cross-angle corrections (in angle vs in coordinates). Kin Yip Collider-Accelerator Department Brookhaven National Lab. Nov. 15, 2011, STAR Collaboration Meeting. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
16
Kin Yip Collider-Accelerator Department Brookhaven National Lab. Elastic pp scattering, A N and r 5 Nov. 15, 2011, STAR Collaboration Meeting Mostly stuff shown in the previous pp2pp/STAR meetings A little bit about the cross-angle corrections (in angle vs in coordinates)
Transcript
Page 1: Elastic pp scattering,  A N  and r 5

Kin Yip

Collider-Accelerator Department

Brookhaven National Lab.

Elastic pp scattering, AN and r5

Nov. 15, 2011, STAR Collaboration Meeting

Mostly stuff shown in the previous pp2pp/STAR meetings

A little bit about the cross-angle corrections (in angle vs in coordinates)

Page 2: Elastic pp scattering,  A N  and r 5

2

Before cross-angle corrections

After cross-angle correctionsfor the East ( -100 rad, 60 rad)

Obviously, no fiducial cuts and hotspot cuts applied in both cases.

All these plots are for all runs.

Nov. 15, 2011 Kin Yip

Page 3: Elastic pp scattering,  A N  and r 5

3

Before Before

AfterAfter

Nov. 15, 2011 Kin Yip

Page 4: Elastic pp scattering,  A N  and r 5

4

After cross-angle corrections With fiducial and hotspot cuts

Nov. 15, 2011 Kin Yip

Page 5: Elastic pp scattering,  A N  and r 5

Before the crossing angle corrections were applied

5

Page 6: Elastic pp scattering,  A N  and r 5

6

Before cross-angle corrections

Page 7: Elastic pp scattering,  A N  and r 5

7

After cross-angle corrections (-100 rad, 60 rad)

Nov. 15, 2011 Kin Yip

Page 8: Elastic pp scattering,  A N  and r 5

8

After cross-angle corrections (-100 rad, 60 rad)

Nov. 15, 2011 Kin Yip

Page 9: Elastic pp scattering,  A N  and r 5

I’ve used Steve’s Sep. 29 transport, Igor’s latest correction and the crossing angle corrections (including hotspot/fiducial cuts).

Systematic errors: (0.03 rad.) and instead of t/t ~10% for all –t bins, I’ve read off the t/t values from JH’s Sept. 21’s talk :

Systematic errors include those of beam divergence & offset, geometry and Leff.

Re(r5) = 0.00124 0.00255

Im(r5) = 0.00751 0.04124

Compared with when t/t ~10% (and no error in ) :

Re(r5) = 0.00124 0.00312

Im(r5) = 0.00719 0.048349

-t 0.00389 0.00775 0.0125 0.0175 0.0232

t/t 9.5% 7% 5.75% 5.25% 4.5%

Nov. 15, 2011 Kin Yip

Page 10: Elastic pp scattering,  A N  and r 5

After all corrections/cuts previously mentioned

10Nov. 15, 2011 Kin Yip

Page 11: Elastic pp scattering,  A N  and r 5

11

2009

2003

3 2

1

Nov. 15, 2011 Kin Yip

Page 12: Elastic pp scattering,  A N  and r 5

12

After cross-angle corrections( -100 rad, 60 rad)

Obviously, no fiducial cuts and hotspot cuts applied in both cases.

All these plots are for all runs.

Nov. 15, 2011 Kin Yip

After cross-angle corrections( -2.5mm, 1.5 mm)

-100 rad & 60 rad are in fact from the asymmetries in coordinate space: -2.5 mm (x) and 1.5 mm (y).

Divided by Leff if (Leff = 25), you get those -100 rad & 60 rad .

Looks identical.

Page 13: Elastic pp scattering,  A N  and r 5

13

Obviously, no fiducial cuts and hotspot cuts applied in both cases.

All these plots are for all runs.

Nov. 15, 2011 Kin Yip

After cross-angle corrections( -2.5mm, 1.5 mm)

Before

Page 14: Elastic pp scattering,  A N  and r 5

14

After cross-angle corrections in coordinates ( -2.5 mm, 1.5 mm )

Nov. 15, 2011 Kin Yip

Differed by ~0.005 mradians or 5 radians.

Page 15: Elastic pp scattering,  A N  and r 5

15

After cross-angle corrections in coordinates ( -2.5 mm, 1.5 mm )

Nov. 15, 2011 Kin Yip

Page 16: Elastic pp scattering,  A N  and r 5

16

After cross-angle corrections in coordinates ( -2.5 mm, 1.5 mm )

Though most Leff is ~25, but for the vertical pot in y, Leff is more like 22.9.

1.5mm / 22.9 ~ 65.5, rather than ~60 -radians.

I can similarly estimate the effect if we include x0/y0 corrections …

I didn’t do the fiducial/hotspot cuts in this case of using coordinates (as cross-angle corrections or whatever you call) as people are still discussing various options/methods and it takes quite a bit of time to do.

Nov. 15, 2011 Kin Yip


Recommended