+ All Categories
Home > Documents > ELCOGAS S.A () 1 -...

ELCOGAS S.A () 1 -...

Date post: 26-Feb-2018
Category:
Upload: tranminh
View: 222 times
Download: 3 times
Share this document with a friend
17
1 14-4: Elcogas 14 MWth pre-combustion carbon dioxide capture pilot: technical & economical achievements Session 14: Syntheses and CtL Concepts Pedro Casero, R&D Department ELCOGAS S.A (www.elcogas.es)
Transcript

1

14-4: Elcogas 14 MWth pre-combustion carbon dioxide capture pilot: technical & economical achievements

Session 14: Syntheses and CtL Concepts

Pedro Casero, R&D DepartmentELCOGAS S.A (www.elcogas.es)

2

SCOPE

CO2 Capture Pilot Plant & H2 production project. Overview

Characterization tests: results

Costs estimation

Conclusions

Spanish company established in April 1992 to undertake the

planning, construction, management and operation of a

335 MWeISO IGCC plant located in Puertollano (Spain)

Puertollano IGCC Power Plant

Repsol YPF Refinery

ENCASUR (open cast coal mine)

Enel, SpA4.32%

Siemens Project Ventures GmbH

2.53%Hidrocantábrico Explotación de Centrales SAU

4.32%

Electricité de France

International, S.A.31.48%

Endesa Generación, S.A.

40.99%

Krupp Koppers GmbH0.04%

Iberdrola Generación, S.A.

12.00%

Hidroeléctrica del Cantábrico, S.A.

4.32%

COAL

C (%p) 36.27

Ash (%p) 41.10

S (%p) 0.93

LHV (MJ/kg) 13.10

PET COKE

C (%p) 82.21

Ash (%p) 0.26

S (%p) 5.50

LHV (MJ/kg) 31.99

GROSS TOTAL (MW)

NET TOTAL (MW)

POWER OUTPUT

317.7 282.7 GROSS

(%) NET (%) EFICIENCIA

(PCI) 47.12 42.2

IGCC & ELCOGAS, S.A

Consejería de Educación, Ciencia y Cultura

To demonstrate the feasibility of capture of CO2 and production of H2 in an IGCC.

To obtain economic data enough to scale it to the full Puertollano IGCC capacity in synthetic gas production.

Targets

Location Full integrated in IGCC Puertollano Power Plant

Size 14 MWt (2% slip-stream of the IGCC plant)

Capture Technology Precombustion. Capture > 90%Products are recycled back (not included CO2 storage).

Budget Construction & commissioning: 13,5 M€

Funding programme National programme cofinanced by MICINN and JCCM with 7,1 M€.

Status End commissioning in October 2010

Official characterisation tests from October 2010 to June 2011

Now involved in FECUNDUS (VI FP) and in internal research

Since starting commissioning: 770 operating hours.

CO2 Capture Pilot Plant. ProjectPSE-120000-2005-2/PSS-120000-2005-10

PSE-120000-2006-39/PSS-120000-2006-8

PSE-120000-2007-6/PSS-120000-2007-25

PSE-120000-2008-6/PSS-120000-2008-29

PSE-120000-2009-14/PSS-120000-2009-57

5

CO2 Capture Pilot Plant. Block Diagram Process

COMBINEDCYCLE

COAL + COKE

GASIFICATION

Raw gas FILTRATION

SYSTEM

Syngas

PURIFICATION &

DESULPHURATION

Tail gas1,3 bar

IP STEAMSHIFT REACTOR

CO2

CO2 & H2separation

(Chemical, aMDEA)

100 t/d

CO + H2O → CO2 + H2

Raw H2 (80% of purity)

40%

H2 rich gas

37,5 % CO250,0 % H23,0 % CO

HYDROGENPURIFICATION

(PSA)

Recycle compressor

Pure H2 (2 t/d)

99,99% H2 @ 15 bar

SWEET /SOUR

+H2S (1,44%)

2% 2%

0,110COS

0,700% H2S

10,400,29% H2O

19,5721,95% H2

53,7260,45% CO

138126T (ºC)

23,619,8P (bar)

40063610F (Nm3/h)

SOURSWEET

r

Shiftedgas

Cond.gas

CO2 Capture Pilot Plant. Tests. Shift converter unit

Characterization Test . Shift Converter Unit

Syngas

IP steam

Shifted gas

Gas condensate

LP Steam Generator

IP Steam Generator

Shifting reactor 2

Shifting reactor 1

2.1 / 1.92.1 / 1.9Catalystvolume (m3)

2.912.88Steam / CO (molar)

480 / 390480 / 390Outlet T (ºC)

310 / 350310 / 350Inlet T (ºC)

Katalco K8-11 (Co-Mo)

Katalco 71-5M (Fe-Cr)Catalyst (JM)

SOURSWEETDesign values

SHIFTING UNIT STEAM/GAS RATIO (kg/kg)SOUR

Mín. ratio = 1,04

Ref.(Ratio = 1,18)

Máx ratio. = 1,33

CO2 Capture Pilot Plant. Tests. Shift converter unit

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

340 360 380 400 420 440 460 480 500 520 540

Temperature (ºC)

CO

(%)

XCO(%) = 95,70

XCO(%) = 96,47XCO(%) = 96,78

XCO(%) : CO total conversion in WGS

8

CO2 Capture Pilot Plant. Tests. Shift converter unitOutcome

Number of reactors CO outlet shifting unit CO2 capture (shifting + amines)

2 2.9% 91%

1 10.6% 75%

Operation with sour catalyst found to be more stable that with sweet catalyst.

Number of reactors: 95% of the total conversion takes place in the 1st reactor. Are necessary two stages?. Cost assessment: investment cost vs. capture rate

Design figures in sweet conditions

Steam consumption: key parameter for efficiency and capture rate. Cost assesmentof 30% in steam consumption leads to 1% in CO conversion

Feed gas Steam consumption Thermal efficiency Shifting Unit

sweet 5.055 kg/h 75,3%

sour 4.706 kg/h 77,1%Design values

CO2 Capture Pilot Plant. Tests. CO2 & H2 separation unitCharacterization Test . CO2 & H2 Separation Unit

YCO2 product

Rich  H2 gas

LP steam

Y 40 %

60 %

LP steam to reboiler

H2 to PSA

From shiftingunit

Cooling stage

Absorber

CO2Stripper

CO2 separator

Syngasseparator

Cond. Separator

ProcessCond.

Shifted gas

98.2499.78CO2 in CO2 stream (% vol dry)

0.220.19H2 in CO2 stream (% vol dry)

1.510H2S in CO2 stream (% vol dry)

92.991.7CO2 recovery rate (%)

3.13.1Regeneration energy (GJ / tCO2)

0.85 / 920.85 / 92.6Regeneration P (barg) / T (ºC)

18.7 / 4014.9 / 40Absober P (barg) / T (ºC)

SOURSWEET

10

CO2 Capture Pilot Plant. Tests. CO2 & H2 separation unit

14% CO2 recovery

Steam consumption vs CO2 recovery(sweet)

desorption T: 82 ºCsteam flow: 2.980 kg/h

desorption T: 104 ºCsteam flow: 5.506 kg/h

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9 1 1,1 1,2 1,3Presión de desorción (barg)

Fuga

de

CO

2 (%

)92ºC

85ºC

68ºC

CO2 leak in H2 stream vs desorption (P, T) (sour)

11

CO2 Capture Pilot Plant. CO2 capture cost estimation

Scenario. To add a carbon capture unit to the Puertollano IGCC Plant based on Pilot Plant Retrofitting, being feeding gas to carbon capture unit free of sulphur compounds (sweet mode).

Investment costs. Installation costs: 349.800.000 € (not PSA, scale factor, 25 years, IR: 3 %).

Fixed O&M Costs: Spare, consumables, maintenance, external services,…: based on in-houseinformation: 416.232 €/y.

Variable O&M costs: Efficiency loss => Production loss = f (operating hours: 6.500; load factor: 0,92; efficiency penalty: 9%; electricity price: 40 €/MWh).

Total of CO2 captured: 90%

Cost of non-emitted CO2 (without compression) : 26,35 €/tCO2

Extensive sensitive analysis has been carried out (scale factor, operating hours, load factor, COE, ∆η , investment costs).

2

22 CO emitted-non ofamount

addition Unit CO from derivedCost emittednot CO ofCost =

12

CO2 Capture Pilot Plant. CO2 capture cost estimation

10

2030

40

50

6070

80

90

27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37

IGCC plant efficiency with CO2 capture, %

CO

2 co

st, €

/t C

O2

3.000 h

3.500 h

4.000 h

4.500 h

5.000 h

5.500 h

6.000 h

6.500 h

7.000 h

7.500 h

6,500 hOperating hours (IGCC mode)

0.75Scale factor

0.5 %Bank fee

3.0 %Bank interest

25 Expected life

Data Variables

6,500 hOperating hours (IGCC mode)

0.75Scale factor

0.5 %Bank fee

3.0 %Bank interest

25 Expected life

Data Variables Data Variables Data Variables

100 %Treated gas

33 %Net efficiency of power plant with CO2 capture

40 €/MWhElectricity price

0.92 Average load factor

100 %Treated gas

33 %Net efficiency of power plant with CO2 capture

40 €/MWhElectricity price

0.92 Average load factor

Effect of plant efficiency in CO2 capture as retrofitting

13

CO2 Capture Pilot Plant. CO2 capture cost estimation

102030405060708090

20 40 60 80 100 120

Electricity price, €/MWh

CO

2 cos

t, €/

t CO

23.000 h

3.500 h

4.000 h

4.500 h

5.000 h

5.500 h

6.000 h

6.500 h

7.000 h

7.500 h

6,500 hOperating hours (IGCC mode)

0.75Scale factor

0.5 %Bank fee

3.0 %Bank interest

25 Expected life

Data Variables

6,500 hOperating hours (IGCC mode)

0.75Scale factor

0.5 %Bank fee

3.0 %Bank interest

25 Expected life

Data Variables Data Variables Data Variables

100 %Treated gas

33 %Net efficiency of power plant with CO2 capture

40 €/MWhElectricity price

0.92 Average load factor

100 %Treated gas

33 %Net efficiency of power plant with CO2 capture

40 €/MWhElectricity price

0.92 Average load factor

Effect of electricity price in CO2 capture as retrofitting

14

CO2 Capture Pilot Plant. CO2 capture cost estimation

GASIFICATIONFILTRATION

SYSTEMDESULFURATION

CO2 CAPTURE

GICCCOAL+COKE

Raw gas

Syngas

Scenario: The inlet gas is raw gas took upstream the desulphurisation system of the IGCC, so a sour catalyst isused in the conversion unit.

Cost

Net efficiency ofpower plant with

CO2 capture

12.980 k€/y13.900 k€/y

25,62 €/t CO226,35 €/t CO2Cost of non-emitted CO2 (without

compression)

90%90%Total of CO2 captured

35 %33 %Variable O&M Costs

354 k€/y416 k€/yFixed O&M Costs

349.800 k€349.800 k€Investment Costs

SOURSWEETCost for retrofitting of existing plant

Without capture

DESULFURATION GICCCOAL+COKE

Syngas

With capture

Elementary sulfur

CO2 + H2S (1,44%)

FILTRATION

SYSTEM

Raw gas

GASIFICATION

15

0

0,5

1

1,5

2

2,5

0 20 40 60 80

Electricity market price (€/MWh)

H2

mar

ket p

rice

unc

ompr

esse

d(€

/kg)

Breakeven curve of electricity and hydrogen market prices

1,65

CO2 Capture Pilot Plant. H2 & electricity co-production

• Hydrogen is produced in the pilot at 15 bar and 43ºC, so it requires conditioning prior being commercialized.

• Taking into account the O&M costs of the H2 production, for the depicted conditions (60 €/MWh, 1,65 €/kg), a minimum of 1.850 operating hours per year is required.

• Modification of the existing Environmental Permit would also be required.

• There are very few references for the sell price of H2 in fuel hydrogen stations for vehicles . The prices varies between 8 and 15 €/kg.

Better sell electricity

Better sell H2

16

Final Conclusions

1) The carbon capture pilot Project has been a success: first of its kind in theworld, >90% capture rate achieved, and CO2 capture cost can be <30 €/t

2) Commercial technology at any scale is available: the singularity comes from“integration in a existing IGCC plant”

3) Tests carried out show room for improvement in operating conditions andoptimization of energy balance.

4) Carbon capture cost estimations come from figures of a real project.

5) From now on, the pilot is being used for internal research (FECUNDUS: biomass cogasification tests incorporating carbon capture)

6) But it is also open for international research projects and for other kinds ofcollaboration

17

14-4: Elcogas 14 MWth pre-combustion carbon dioxide capture pilot: technical & economical achievements

Session 14: Syntheses and CtL Concepts

Pedro Casero, R&D DepartmentELCOGAS S.A (www.elcogas.es)


Recommended