Electronic Supplementary Information
Syntheses of Ag–Au and Ag–Pd alloy triangular hollow nanoframes by galvanic replacement reactions without and with post-treatment using NaCl in an aqueous solution
Masaharu Tsuji,* a,b,c Takafumi Kidera,b Atsuhiko Yajima,c Mika Hamasaki,d Masashi Hattori,aTakeshi Tsuji a,b and Hirofumi Kawazumid
a Institute for Materials Chemistry and Engineering, Kyushu University, Kasuga 816-8580, Japan. Fax: +81-092-583-7815; Tel.: +81-092-583-7815; E-mail:[email protected]
b Department of Applied Science for Electronics and Materials, Graduate School of Engineering Sciences, Kyushu University, Kasuga 816-8580, Japan
c Department of Automotive Science, Graduate School of Integrated Frontier Sciences, Kyushu University, Kasuga, 816-8580, Japan
d Department of Biological and Environmental Chemistry, School of Humanity-oriented Science and Technology, Kinki University, Iizuka 820-8555, Japan
*To whom correspondence should be addressed: E-mail: [email protected]
S1
Electronic Supplementary Material (ESI) for CrystEngComm.This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014
Fig. S1 Ag prisms prepared by AgNO3/NaBH4/PVP/Na3CA/H2O2 solution at reaction time of 30 min.
20 nm
S2
Fig. S2 (a) TEM, (b)-(e) TEM-EDS, and (f) line analysis data of Ag-Au alloys involving Cl component. The sample was obtained at Au/Ag molar ratio of 0.3.
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0 50 100 150 200 250
AuAgCl
Dis
tribu
tions
of A
u, A
g, a
nd C
l com
pone
nts
Distance / nm
(a) TEM (b) Au component
(c) Ag component (d) Cl component
(e) Au, Ag, and Clcomponents
(f) Line analysis along a blue line in (a)
100 nm
S3
Fig. S3 (a) SAED pattern of a typical Ag triangular prism shown by a red circle of TEM image (b). This nanoparticle was prepared from AgNO3NaBH4PVPNa3CAH2O2solution at reaction time of 30 min.
{220}1/3{422}
(a) SAED (b) TEM
50 nm
S4
Fig. S4 XRD patterns of (a) Ag prisms and (b) Ag-Au alloy frames. Two peaks shown by red arrows arise from a hcp arrangement of Ag atoms. Ag prisms and Ag-Au frames were prepared using the same conditions as those in Fig. 1 and 2.
0
20
40
60
80
100
30 40 50 60 70 80 90In
tens
ity (A
rb. U
nits
)
Ag {111}
{200}{220} {311}
{222}
(a) Ag prisms
05
101520253035
30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Inte
nsity
(Arb
. Uni
ts)
2 degree
AgCl {200}
Ag-Au {111}
{200}
{220}{311}
{222}{220}
(b) Ag-Au frames
hcp peaks
S5
Fig. S5 Schematic of a nanoprism with a defect-induced hcp layer sandwiched between two fcc layers of unequal thicknesses.
S6
{111}
0
5
1 0
1 5
2 0
2 5
3 0
3 0 4 0 5 0 6 0 7 0 8 0 9 0
Inte
nsity
(Arb
. Uni
ts)
2 d e g re e
(b) Ag-Pd nanoframesafter NaCl treatment
1
2
3
4
5
6
30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Inte
nsity
(Arb
. Uni
ts)
(a) Ag-Pd nanoprismsbefore NaCl treatment
Ag-Pd{111}
Fig. S6 XRD patterns of Ag-Pd nanoprisms and nanoframes (a) before and (b) after NaCltreatment. Ag-Pd nanoprisms were prepared using the same condition as that in Fig. 6. Two peaks shown by red arrows arise from a hcp arrangement of Ag atoms. Blue dots lines in (b) are AgCl peaks.
hcp peaks
S7
{220}
{311}
Ag-Pd {111}
Fig. S7 (a) time-dependent evolution of UV-Vis-NIR spectra of Ag prisms after addition of saturated NaCl solution and TEM images of Ag prisms (b) before and (c) after NaCl treatment.
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
0 s1 s2 s5 s10 s20 s30 s40 s100 s7200 s
Extin
ctio
n
Wavelength / nm
(b) Before NaCl after treatment (c) After NaCl after treatment
(a) UV-Vis-NIR spectra after NaCl after treatment
50 nm
S8