+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Elizabeth Podbielski · Figure 1. APL #391A E3 is an oyster from a subtidal reef in Apalachicola...

Elizabeth Podbielski · Figure 1. APL #391A E3 is an oyster from a subtidal reef in Apalachicola...

Date post: 24-Aug-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
1
Introduction Northeastern’s Marine Science Center (MSC) is found about 40 minutes north of Boston on the peninsula that is Nahant, MA. The MSC is situated on Nahant’s East Point and is surrounded by rocky intertidal zone habitats that are perfect for conducting research. Many professors in the Department of Marine and Environmental Sciences have labs at the MSC where they conduct research on a wide variety of topics ranging from coral reef ecology to oceanography to fisheries management. The specific lab I worked in was a coastal marine ecology lab headed by Dr. David Kimbro. I became interested in the Kimbro lab because of the wide variety of systems they studied, such as oyster reefs, salt marshes, and seagrass beds. Activity While working in the Kimbro lab I was able to assist Dr. Kimbro’s graduate students, Tanya and Harriet, with their field work over the summer. About every other week or so we travelled to different sites along the Gulf of Maine, with the majority on Cape Cod, where we would then go out at low tide and trap for blue and green crabs as well as conduct a vegetation survey of the salt marsh flora and fauna. When I was not out in the field I was back at the MSC doing a variety of molecular work with Dr. Kimbro’s post-doc, Torrie. Torrie taught me how to perform multiplex PCR and gel electrophoresis, and by the end of my co-op I had sent thirty plates away for genotyping. Additionally, I completed DNA extractions for both Phragmites and Crassostrea virginica. During the last two months of my co-op at the MSC I began working on my own research project using the oysters from one of Dr. Kimbro’s research projects. Acknowledgments I would like to thank my co-op supervisor, Dr. David Kimbro, for allowing me to work in his lab and for being a great mentor. I would also like to thank Torrance Hanley for being my oyster shucking partner-in-crime and for teaching me everything I need to know about PCR. I would like to thank Harriet Booth and Tanya Rogers for allowing me to help them with their field work, and Forest Schenck and Amelia Weiss for helping me time and time again in the lab and for always knowing where the extra supplies are kept. Finally, I would like to thank the College of Science for funding my great co-op experience. Outcomes I earned the name “Queen of Shucks” after Torrie and I successfully shucked and extracted DNA from over 600 oysters; these oysters were from one of Dr. Kimbro’s projects down in Apalachicola (APL) and Ochlockonee (OB) Bay, FL. Upon the conclusion of the extractions I was able to start my own independent research project, which looked at the presence of boring sponges (Cliona sp.) and mud blister worms in the shells of the oysters from the surveys in APL and OB. Clionid sponges and mud blister worms negatively affect the oysters because it weakens the shells’ integrity, which then leaves them more susceptible to disease and predation. The first step of my project was to measure the length of each valve and note the presence of boring sponge and mud blisters. After this I would then photograph the exterior and interior of each valve and then weigh each valve individually to get the wet weight. I put each valve in separate tins and then placed them in the drying oven for 48 hours, after which I would then weigh the shells again so I could calculate the condition index of each oyster. The last step of my project involved using imageJ to analyze the area of each valve to determine the percentage of the oyster affected by boring sponge. Each shell was graded into four different categories based on the severity of the erosion. Figure 1 is an example of a grade 3 oyster, which means that over 60% of the shell’s surface area is covered with boring sponge holes. Reflection My co-op in the Kimbro lab at the Marine Science Center was everything I wanted for my first co-op experience. Working hands-on in a lab taught me many things that I never would have been able to experience in a classroom, such as trapping and tethering crabs, and extracting DNA from oysters. I was able to network with other professors and staff at the Marine Science Center and I’m truly honored that my lab would like me to return again this summer to work with them. Additionally, this co-op experience allowed me to see the different sides of an academia/research- based occupation. While I wasn’t conducting my own experiment or collecting data for myself, I was able to go out in the field and see two different Ph.D projects in action. Tanya and Harriet also told me a lot about the different options for graduate school and work after college, which was extremely helpful seeing as I will need to start looking at graduate schools very soon. Prior to this co-op I had never done a PCR or DNA extraction, but by the end of my six months in the Kimbro lab I could successfully do both of those things on my own without the help of a more experienced member of the lab. I am extremely grateful for being given the opportunity to work in the Kimbro lab last semester; this co-op experience reaffirmed my passion for marine science and I have a better idea of what I’d like to do after I graduate from Northeastern. Elizabeth Podbielski Northeastern University Marine Science Center, Nahant MA 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 Intertidal Subtidal Boring Sponge Prevalence Habitat APL OB Figure 1. APL #391A E3 is an oyster from a subtidal reef in Apalachicola Bay on the east side of where the river deposits into the Gulf of Mexico. Figure 2. Boring sponge is the most prevalent in the APL subtidal region, but for OB boring sponge is more prevalent in the intertidal region. 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 Intertidal Subtidal Boring Sponge Grade Habitat APL OB Figure 4. The intensity, or grade, of boring sponge is significantly higher in the APL subtidal region than it is in the intertidal region for APL, and the subtidal and intertidal regions of OB. Bottom Left: A salt marsh we surveyed in Pleasant Bay, Orleans, MA. Bottom Center: a heart-shaped spat from an oyster in Apalachicola Bay. Figure 3. A map of the sites the oysters came from in APL. W sites are west of the river and E sites are east of the river mouth.
Transcript
Page 1: Elizabeth Podbielski · Figure 1. APL #391A E3 is an oyster from a subtidal reef in Apalachicola Bay on the east side of where the river deposits into the Gulf of Mexico. Figure 2.

IntroductionNortheastern’s Marine Science Center (MSC) is found about 40 minutes north of Boston on the peninsula that is Nahant, MA. The MSC is situated on Nahant’s East Point and is surrounded by rocky intertidal zone habitats that are perfect for conducting research. Many professors in the Department of Marine and Environmental Sciences have labs at the MSC where they conduct research on a wide variety of topics ranging from coral reef ecology to oceanography to fisheries management. The specific lab I worked in was a coastal marine ecology lab headed by Dr. David Kimbro. I became interested in the Kimbro lab because of the wide variety of systems they studied, such as oyster reefs, salt marshes, and seagrass beds.

ActivityWhile working in the Kimbro lab I was able to assist Dr. Kimbro’s graduate students, Tanya and Harriet, with their field work over the summer. About every other week or so we travelled to different sites along the Gulf of Maine, with the majority on Cape Cod, where we would then go out at low tide and trap for blue and green crabs as well as conduct a vegetation survey of the salt marsh flora and fauna. When I was not out in the field I was back at the MSC doing a variety of molecular work with Dr. Kimbro’s post-doc, Torrie. Torrie taught me how to perform multiplex PCR and gel electrophoresis, and by the end of my co-op I had sent thirty plates away for genotyping. Additionally, I completed DNA extractions for both Phragmites and Crassostrea virginica. During the last two months of my co-op at the MSC I began working on my own research project using the oysters from one of Dr. Kimbro’s research projects.

AcknowledgmentsI would like to thank my co-op supervisor, Dr. David Kimbro, for allowing me to work in his lab and for being a great mentor. I would also like to thank Torrance Hanley for being my oyster shucking partner-in-crime and for teaching me everything I need to know about PCR. I would like to thank Harriet Booth and Tanya Rogers for allowing me to help them with their field work, and Forest Schenck and Amelia Weiss for helping me time and time again in the lab and for always knowing where the extra supplies are kept. Finally, I would like to thank the College of Science for funding my great co-op experience.

OutcomesI earned the name “Queen of Shucks” after Torrie and I successfully shucked and extracted DNA from over 600 oysters; these oysters were from one of Dr. Kimbro’s projects down in Apalachicola (APL) and Ochlockonee (OB) Bay, FL. Upon the conclusion of the extractions I was able to start my own independent research project, which looked at the presence of boring sponges (Cliona sp.) and mud blister worms in the shells of the oysters from the surveys in APL and OB. Clionid sponges and mud blister worms negatively affect the oysters because it weakens the shells’ integrity, which then leaves them more susceptibleto disease and predation.

The first step of my project was to measure the length of each valve and note the presence of boring sponge and mud blisters.After this I would then photograph the exterior and interior of each valve and then weigh each valve individually to get the wet weight. I put each valve in separate tins and then placed them in the drying oven for 48 hours, after which I would then weigh the shells again so I could calculate the condition index of each oyster. The last step of my project involved using imageJ to analyze the area of each valve to determine the percentage of the oyster affected by boring sponge. Each shell was graded into four different categories based on the severity of the erosion. Figure 1 is an example of a grade 3 oyster, which means that over 60% of the shell’s surface area is covered with boring sponge holes.

ReflectionMy co-op in the Kimbro lab at the Marine Science Center was everything I wanted for my first co-op experience. Working hands-on in a lab taught me many things that I never would have been able to experience in a classroom, such as trapping and tethering crabs, and extracting DNA from oysters. I was able to network with other professors and staff at the Marine Science Center and I’m truly honored that my lab would like me to return again this summer to work with them. Additionally, this co-op experience allowed me to see the different sides of an academia/research-based occupation. While I wasn’t conducting my own experiment or collecting data for myself, I was able to go out in the field and see two different Ph.D projects in action. Tanya and Harriet also told me a lot about the different options for graduate school and work after college, which was extremely helpful seeing as I will need to start looking at graduate schools very soon. Prior to this co-op I had never done a PCR or DNA extraction, but by the end of my six months in the Kimbro lab I could successfully do both of those things on my own without the help of a more experienced member of the lab. I am extremely grateful for being given the opportunity to work in the Kimbro lab last semester; this co-op experience reaffirmed my passion for marine science and I have a better idea of what I’d like to do after I graduate from Northeastern.

Elizabeth PodbielskiNortheastern University Marine Science Center, Nahant MA

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

Intertidal Subtidal

Bo

rin

g Sp

on

ge P

reva

len

ce

Habitat

APL

OB

Figure 1. APL #391A E3 is an oyster from a subtidal reef in Apalachicola Bay on the east side of where the river deposits into the Gulf of Mexico.

Figure 2. Boring sponge is the most prevalent in the APL subtidalregion, but for OB boring sponge is more prevalent in the intertidal region.

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2

Intertidal Subtidal

Bo

rin

g Sp

on

ge G

rad

e

Habitat

APL

OB

Figure 4. The intensity, or grade, of boring sponge is significantlyhigher in the APL subtidal region than it is in the intertidal regionfor APL, and the subtidal and intertidal regions of OB.

Bottom Left: A salt marsh we surveyed in Pleasant Bay, Orleans, MA. Bottom Center: a heart-shaped spat from an oyster in Apalachicola Bay.

Figure 3. A map of the sites the oysters came from in APL. W sites are west of the river and E sites are east of the river mouth.

Recommended