+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Emergency Ultrasound Standard Reporting Guidelines - ACEP

Emergency Ultrasound Standard Reporting Guidelines - ACEP

Date post: 12-Mar-2022
Category:
Upload: others
View: 4 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
29
Emergency Ultrasound Standard Reporting Guidelines October 2011
Transcript
Page 1: Emergency Ultrasound Standard Reporting Guidelines - ACEP

Emergency Ultrasound Standard Reporting

Guidelines

October 2011

Page 2: Emergency Ultrasound Standard Reporting Guidelines - ACEP

Emergency Ultrasound Standard Reporting Guidelines: Introduction and Statement of Purpose Developed by members of the ACEP Emergency Ultrasound Section These guidelines represent the product of a working group that was formed based on discussions at the Industry Roundtable subcommittee of the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) Ultrasound Section. The impetus for these guidelines emerged from discussions with emergency ultrasound leaders and industry, both ultrasound manufacturers and electronic medical record (EMR) companies that indicated a need for a more structured method to report and communicate the findings of point-of-care (POC) emergency ultrasound (EUS). This document serves as a resource to clinicians with a wide range of experience, and as such may contain fields or terms that may not be appropriate in all situations or by all clinicians. It is important to note that these guidelines in no way represent required elements of reporting

. In fact, in general these guidelines err on the side of including more fields than may be used by most emergency physicians, and it is expected that many fields may remain unused depending on the situations. The elements that are BOLDED represent the core emergency ACEP views, findings and interpretations for each application.

The purpose of these guidelines is to define fields that may be helpful for POC EUS in a consistent order, with consistent definitions, and in a method that may be easily coded into electronic communications and computer databases. The goal of this document is to accurately report the findings that commonly result from an ultrasound performed by a clinician in the emergency department and to avoid confusion with reports generated by other specialties. We hope to eventually use these guidelines to work with existing reporting structures such as DICOM and initiatives through the Integrated Health Enterprise (IHE) to develop consistent non-proprietary methods of reporting and communicating POC EUS examination findings. Exams included in this draft:

• FAST • Focused Abdominal Aorta • Focused Pelvic Ultrasound

• Obstetrical • Non-obstetrical

• Focused Biliary • Focused Renal/ Urinary Tract • Focused Thoracic • Focused Lower Extremity Venous • Focused Cardiac (Echo) • Focused Soft Tissue/MSK • Focused Ocular

In development: Ultrasound guided procedures Testicular Symptom based (hypotension, dyspnea, abdominal pain, chest pain)

FORMAT All diagnostic examinations should include:

• Patient/exam demographics • Indications for examination • Views • Findings • Interpretation • Quality assurance

Page 3: Emergency Ultrasound Standard Reporting Guidelines - ACEP

The first and last portions should be consistent across exam types and are presented here.

Patient/ exam demographics:

Patient name: ________________________ Patient gender: M F DOB: ___ / ___ / ___ MR#: ___________________ Bar Code/Patient Identifier:______________ Hospital Name:______________ Date and time of exam: ___ / ___ / ___ Exam type: Diagnostic Educational Procedural Clinical category: Resuscitative Symptom based Therapeutic

Unknown/other Initial exam Repeat exam Primary person obtaining/ interpreting images: __________________ Secondary person obtaining/ interpreting images: __________________ Additional person(s) obtaining/ interpreting images: __________________

Quality assurance:

Suggested Quality Assurance Grading Scale 1 2 3 4 5

Grading Scale Definitions

No recognizable structures, no objective data can be gathered

Minimally recognizable structures but insufficient for diagnosis

Minimal criteria met for diagnosis, recognizable structures but with some technical or other flaws

Minimal criteria met for diagnosis, all structures imaged well and diagnosis easily supported

Minimal criteria met for diagnosis, all structures imaged with excellent image quality and diagnosis completely supported

Image quality 1 2 3 4 5 Accuracy of interpretation of images as presented TP TN FP FN Accuracy of interpretation of images as compared to gold standard (ie, CT, operative report) TP TN FP FN

Comments: ___________________________________________________________________

Page 4: Emergency Ultrasound Standard Reporting Guidelines - ACEP

FAST EXAM

The elements that are BOLDED represent the core emergency ACEP views, findings and interpretations for each application.

Patient/ exam demographics:

Patient name: ________________________ Patient gender: M F DOB: ___ / ___ / ___ MR#: ___________________ Bar Code/Patient Identifier:______________ Hospital Name:___________________ Date and time of exam: ___ / ___ / ___ Exam type: Diagnostic Educational Procedural Clinical category: Resuscitative Symptom based Therapeutic

Unknown/ other Initial exam Repeat exam Primary person obtaining/ interpreting images: __________________ Secondary person obtaining/ interpreting images: __________________ Additional person(s) obtaining/ interpreting images: __________________

blunt trauma tachycardia Indication(s) for exam:

penetrating trauma dyspnea abdominal pain altered mental status chest pain pregnancy hypotension educational other: _______________________

Hepatorenal adequate limited not obtained Views:

Perisplenic adequate limited not obtained Suprapubic adequate limited not obtained Pericardial adequate limited not obtained R thorax for fluid adequate limited not obtained R thorax for lung sliding adequate limited not obtained L thorax for fluid adequate limited not obtained L thorax for lung sliding adequate limited not obtained

other: _______________________

Hepatorenal free fluid: absent present indeterminate Findings:

Perisplenic free fluid: absent present indeterminate Suprapubic free fluid: absent present indeterminate Right thoracic fluid: present absent indeterminate Right lung sliding present absent indeterminate

Page 5: Emergency Ultrasound Standard Reporting Guidelines - ACEP

lung point sign yes no Left thoracic fluid: present absent indeterminate Left lung sliding: present absent indeterminate lung point sign yes no Pericardial effusion: present absent indeterminate size if present small moderate large present size not specified other: _______________________

Peritoneal free fluid: present absent indeterminate Interpretation:

Pericardial effusion: present absent indeterminate Right thoracic fluid: present absent indeterminate Left thoracic fluid: present absent indeterminate Right lung pneumothorax: present absent indeterminate Left lung pneumothorax: present absent indeterminate

other: _______________________

Quality assurance:

Suggested Quality Assurance Grading Scale

1 2 3 4 5 Grading Scale Definitions

No recognizable structures, no objective data can be gathered

Minimally recognizable structures but insufficient for diagnosis

Minimal criteria met for diagnosis, recognizable structures but with some technical or other flaws

Minimal criteria met for diagnosis, all structures imaged well and diagnosis easily supported

Minimal criteria met for diagnosis, all structures imaged with excellent image quality and diagnosis completely supported

Image quality 1 2 3 4 5 Accuracy of interpretation of images as presented TP TN FP FN Accuracy of interpretation of images as compared to gold standard (ie, CT, operative report) TP TN FP FN Comments: ___________________________________________________________________

Page 6: Emergency Ultrasound Standard Reporting Guidelines - ACEP

FOCUSED ABDOMINAL AORTA

The elements that are BOLDED represent the core emergency ACEP views, findings and interpretations for each application.

Patient/ exam demographics:

Patient name: ________________________ Patient gender: M F DOB: ___ / ___ / ___ MR#: ___________________ Bar Code/Patient Identifier:______________ Hospital Name:________________ Date and time of exam: ___ / ___ / ___ Exam type: Diagnostic Educational Procedural Clinical category: Resuscitative Symptom based Therapeutic

Unknown/ other Initial exam Repeat exam Primary person obtaining/ interpreting images: __________________ Secondary person obtaining/ interpreting images: __________________ Additional person(s) obtaining/ interpreting images: __________________

abdominal pain syncope Indication(s) for exam:

chest pain hypotension back pain tachycardia flank pain educational pulsatile abdominal mass other: _______________________

Proximal Transverse view: complete inadequate Views:

Distal Transverse view complete inadequate Sagittal view: complete inadequate Celiac artery: visualized not visualized Bifurcation: visualized not visualized

Aneurysm: present absent indeterminate Findings:

If present: suprarenal infrarenal both iliac Maximal aortic diameter: ____cm

other: ________________________

Sonographic Evidence for Aneurysm: present absent indeterminate Interpretation:

If present: ____cm transverse diameter other: ________________________

Page 7: Emergency Ultrasound Standard Reporting Guidelines - ACEP

Quality assurance:

Suggested Quality Assurance Grading Scale

1 2 3 4 5 Grading Scale Definitions

No recognizable structures, no objective data can be gathered

Minimally recognizable structures but insufficient for diagnosis

Minimal criteria met for diagnosis, recognizable structures but with some technical or other flaws

Minimal criteria met for diagnosis, all structures imaged well and diagnosis easily supported

Minimal criteria met for diagnosis, all structures imaged with excellent image quality and diagnosis completely supported

Image quality 1 2 3 4 5 Accuracy of interpretation of images as presented TP TN FP FN Accuracy of interpretation of images as compared to gold standard (ie, CT, operative report) TP TN FP FN Comments: ___________________________________________________________________

Page 8: Emergency Ultrasound Standard Reporting Guidelines - ACEP

FOCUSED OBSTETRICAL PELVIC ULTRASOUND

The elements that are BOLDED represent the core emergency ACEP views, findings and interpretations for each application.

Patient/ exam demographics:

Patient name: ________________________ Patient gender: M F DOB: ___ / ___ / ___ MR#: ___________________ Bar Code/Patient Identifier:______________ Hospital Name:______________ Date and time of exam: ___ / ___ / ___ Exam type: Diagnostic Educational Procedural Clinical category: Resuscitative Symptom based Therapeutic

Unknown/ other Initial exam Repeat exam Primary person obtaining/ interpreting images: __________________ Secondary person obtaining/ interpreting images: __________________ Additional person(s) obtaining/ interpreting images: __________________

qualitative (urine) hCG positive back pain Indication(s) for exam:

quantitative hCG positive vaginal bleeding Level: _________ pregnant by patient history syncope abdominal pain hypotension pelvic pain trauma other: _______________________ educational

Transabdominal sagittal adequate limited not obtained Views obtained:

Transabdominal transverse adequate limited not obtained Endovaginal sagittal adequate limited not obtained Endovaginal coronal adequate limited not obtained Cul-de-sac adequate limited not obtained Left adnexa adequate limited not obtained Right adnexa adequate limited not obtained Hepatorenal space adequate limited not obtained other: ________________________________

Uterus: anteverted retroverted indeterminate Findings:

Cul-de-sac fluid present no significant fluid indeterminate If fluid present: small moderate large amount not specified

Page 9: Emergency Ultrasound Standard Reporting Guidelines - ACEP

Intrauterine Pregnancy: present absent indeterminate If present: Yolk sac Yolk sac diameter: ____mm Fetal pole Measurement: ____mm Fetal heart FHR: ____bpm Fetal motion

Double decidual sign Gestational sac

Diameter: ____mm For IUP: Location: fundus eccentric indeterminate Myometrial mantle: adequate inadequate indeterminate Minimal thickness: _____mm Crown-rump-length: _____mm Biparietal diameter: _____mm

Gestational age: ___w ___d other: ________ For No IUP Intrauterine contents: indeterminate empty/endometrial stripe

non-specific endometrial fluid collection heterogenous endometrial material molar pregnancy other: _______________________ R adnexa: no significant abnormality ovarian cyst Diameter:____mm Simple complex ovarian mass indeterminate other: _______________________ L adnexa: no significant abnormality ovarian cyst Diameter:____mm Simple complex ovarian mass indeterminate other: _______________________ Hepatorenal space fluid: absent present indeterminate other: _______________________

no definitive intrauterine pregnancy Interpretation:

intrauterine pregnancy live intrauterine pregnancy indeterminate abnormal intrauterine pregnancy molar pregnancy fetal demise

Page 10: Emergency Ultrasound Standard Reporting Guidelines - ACEP

definite ectopic simple ovarian cyst complex ovarian cyst adnexal mass free pelvic fluid free intraperitoneal fluid

other: _______________________

Quality assurance:

Suggested Quality Assurance Grading Scale

1 2 3 4 5 Grading Scale Definitions

No recognizable structures, no objective data can be gathered

Minimally recognizable structures but insufficient for diagnosis

Minimal criteria met for diagnosis, recognizable structures but with some technical or other flaws

Minimal criteria met for diagnosis, all structures imaged well and diagnosis easily supported

Minimal criteria met for diagnosis, all structures imaged with excellent image quality and diagnosis completely supported

Image quality 1 2 3 4 5 Accuracy of interpretation of images as presented TP TN FP FN Accuracy of interpretation of images as compared to gold standard (ie, CT, operative report) TP TN FP FN Comments: ___________________________________________________________________

.

Page 11: Emergency Ultrasound Standard Reporting Guidelines - ACEP

FOCUSED Non-Obstetric PELVIC ULTRASOUND

Patient/ exam demographics:

Patient name: ________________________ Patient gender: M F DOB: ___ / ___ / ___ MR#: ___________________ Bar Code/Patient Identifier:______________ Hospital Name:____________ Date and time of exam: ___ / ___ / ___ Exam type: Diagnostic Educational Procedural Clinical category: Resuscitative Symptom based Therapeutic

Unknown/ other Initial exam Repeat exam Primary person obtaining/ interpreting images: __________________ Secondary person obtaining/ interpreting images: __________________ Additional person(s) obtaining/ interpreting images: __________________

qualitative (urine) hCG negative vaginal bleeding Indication(s) for exam:

quantitative hCG negative syncope abdominal pain hypotension pelvic pain trauma back pain educational other: __________________________

Transabdominal sagittal adequate limited not obtained Views obtained:

Transabdominal transverse adequate limited not obtained Endovaginal sagittal adequate limited not obtained Endovaginal coronal adequate limited not obtained Cul-de-sac adequate limited not obtained Left adnexa adequate limited not obtained Right adnexa adequate limited not obtained Hepatorenal space adequate limited not obtained

other: _________________________

Uterus: anteverted retroverted indeterminate Findings:

Endometrium: empty endometrial stripe Endometrial stripe max thickness: ____mm heterogenous material in endometrium uterine fibroid present Measurement: ____mm

Page 12: Emergency Ultrasound Standard Reporting Guidelines - ACEP

Cul-de-sac: fluid present no significant fluid indeterminate If fluid present: small moderate large amount not specified simple complex

R adnexa: ovarian size: normal enlarged indeterminate

length: ____mm width: ____mm height: ____mm volume: ____ ml ovarian cyst Diameter:____mm Simple complex

Color flow: present absent indeterminate not obtained Spectral flow: present absent indeterminate not obtained Resistive index: ____

ovarian mass indeterminate

L adnexa: ovarian size: normal enlarged indeterminate

length: ____mm width: ____mm height: ____mm volume: ____ ml ovarian cyst Diameter:____mm Simple complex

Color flow: present absent indeterminate not obtained Spectral flow: present absent indeterminate not obtained Resistive index: ____

ovarian mass indeterminate other: ________

No sonographic evidence of gynecological pathology. Interpretation:

ovarian cyst: simple complex sonographic evidence suggestive of ovarian torsion adnexal mass fibroid(s) sonographic evidence of abnormal free fluid in the pelvis other: ________

Quality assurance:

Suggested Quality Assurance Grading Scale

1 2 3 4 5 Grading Scale Definitions

No recognizable structures, no objective data can be gathered

Minimally recognizable structures but insufficient for diagnosis

Minimal criteria met for diagnosis, recognizable structures but with some technical or other flaws

Minimal criteria met for diagnosis, all structures imaged well and diagnosis easily supported

Minimal criteria met for diagnosis, all structures imaged with excellent image quality and diagnosis completely supported

Page 13: Emergency Ultrasound Standard Reporting Guidelines - ACEP

Image quality 1 2 3 4 5 Accuracy of interpretation of images as presented TP TN FP FN Accuracy of interpretation of images as compared to gold standard (ie, CT, operative report) TP TN FP FN Comments: ___________________________________________________________________

Page 14: Emergency Ultrasound Standard Reporting Guidelines - ACEP

FOCUSED BILIARY

The elements that are BOLDED represent the core emergency ACEP views, findings and interpretations for each application.

Patient/ exam demographics:

Patient name: ________________________ Patient gender: M F DOB: ___ / ___ / ___ MR#: ___________________ Bar Code/Patient Identifier:______________ Hospital Name:_______________ Date and time of exam: ___ / ___ / ___ Exam type: Diagnostic Educational Procedural Clinical category: Resuscitative Symptom based Therapeutic

Unknown/ other Initial exam Repeat exam Primary person obtaining/ interpreting images: __________________ Secondary person obtaining/ interpreting images: __________________ Additional person(s) obtaining/ interpreting images: __________________

abnormal labs pancreatitis Indication(s) for exam:

abdominal pain fever jaundice educational other: ________

Gallbladder long axis: adequate limited not obtained Views obtained:

Gallbladder short axis: adequate limited not obtained Common bile duct: adequate limited not obtained Main lobar fissure: visualized not visualized Portal vein: visualized not visualized

Gallstone(s): present absent indeterminate Findings:

If stones present: single multiple largest measured: ____mm

mobile non-mobile in fundus in body

in neck Gallbladder wall: thickened not thickened indeterminate Wall thickness:__________mm

Page 15: Emergency Ultrasound Standard Reporting Guidelines - ACEP

Pericholecystic fluid: present absent indeterminate Sonographic Murphy’s sign: present absent indeterminate Common Bile Duct: normal enlarged indeterminate Largest Diameter:________mm Biliary Sludge: present absent indeterminate Polyp: present absent indeterminate Adenomyomatosis present absent indeterminate Transverse gallbladder diameter: ________mm Longitudinal gallbladder diameter: _______mm other: ________

No significant biliary pathology identified Interpretation:

Cholelithiasis without sonographic evidence of cholecystitis Cholelithiasis with sonographic evidence of cholecystitis Sonographic evidence of acalculous cholecystitis Choledocholithiasis Polyps other: ________

Quality assurance:

Suggested Quality Assurance Grading Scale

1 2 3 4 5 Grading Scale Definitions

No recognizable structures, no objective data can be gathered

Minimally recognizable structures but insufficient for diagnosis

Minimal criteria met for diagnosis, recognizable structures but with some technical or other flaws

Minimal criteria met for diagnosis, all structures imaged well and diagnosis easily supported

Minimal criteria met for diagnosis, all structures imaged with excellent image quality and diagnosis completely supported

Image quality 1 2 3 4 5 Accuracy of interpretation of images as presented TP TN FP FN Accuracy of interpretation of images as compared to gold standard (ie, CT, operative report) TP TN FP FN

Comments: ___________________________________________________________________

Page 16: Emergency Ultrasound Standard Reporting Guidelines - ACEP

FOCUSED RENAL/URINARY TRACT

The elements that are BOLDED represent the core emergency ACEP views, findings and interpretations for each application.

Patient/ exam demographics:

Patient name: ________________________ Patient gender: M F DOB: ___ / ___ / ___ MR#: ___________________ Bar Code/Patient Identifier:______________ Hospital Name:_______________ Date and time of exam: ___ / ___ / ___ Exam type: Diagnostic Educational Procedural Clinical category: Resuscitative Symptom based Therapeutic

Unknown/ other Initial exam Repeat exam Primary person obtaining/ interpreting images: __________________ Secondary person obtaining/ interpreting images: __________________ Additional person(s) obtaining/ interpreting images: __________________

abdominal pain dysuria Indication(s) for exam:

flank pain acute renal failure back pain anuria hematuria post-void urinary retention educational other: ________

Right kidney long axis (coronal): adequate limited not obtained Views obtained:

Right kidney short axis: adequate limited not obtained Left kidney long axis (coronal): adequate limited not obtained Left kidney short axis: adequate limited not obtained Transverse bladder: adequate limited not obtained Sagittal bladder: adequate limited not obtained other: ________

Right kidney Findings:

Hydronephrosis: present absent indeterminate If present: mild moderate severe

present degree unspecified Hydoureter: present absent indeterminate

Kidney stones: present absent indeterminate If present: size of largest stone: ___mm

Page 17: Emergency Ultrasound Standard Reporting Guidelines - ACEP

stone location(s):

parenchyma renal pelvis UPJ Ureter UVJ

Renal Cyst: present absent indeterminate If present: simple complex Diameter______mm Extra-renal Pelvis: present absent indeterminate Duplicated Ureteral System: present absent indeterminate

other: ________ Left kidney Hydronephrosis: present absent indeterminate If present: mild moderate severe

present degree unspecified Hydoureter: present absent indeterminate

Kidney stones: present absent indeterminate If present: size of largest stone: ___mm stone location(s):

parenchyma renal pelvis UPJ Ureter UVJ

Renal Cyst: present absent indeterminate If present: simple complex Diameter________mm Extra-renal Pelvis: present absent indeterminate Duplicated Ureteral System: present absent indeterminate

other: ________ Bladder Dimensions width: ___mm height: ___mm depth: ___mm volume: ______mL Right ureteral jet: present absent indeterminate not assessed Left ureteral jet: present absent indeterminate not assessed

other: ___________

No sonographic evidence of renal tract obstruction Interpretation:

Hydronephrosis present left right bilateral mild moderate severe present, degree not specified Hydroureter present left right bilateral Nephrolithiasis left right bilateral parenchyma UPJ UVJ Renal Cyst left right bilateral simple complex

Page 18: Emergency Ultrasound Standard Reporting Guidelines - ACEP

Bladder Size distended collapsed normal

other: ________

Quality assurance:

Suggested Quality Assurance Grading Scale

1 2 3 4 5 Grading Scale Definitions

No recognizable structures, no objective data can be gathered

Minimally recognizable structures but insufficient for diagnosis

Minimal criteria met for diagnosis, recognizable structures but with some technical or other flaws

Minimal criteria met for diagnosis, all structures imaged well and diagnosis easily supported

Minimal criteria met for diagnosis, all structures imaged with excellent image quality and diagnosis completely supported

Image quality 1 2 3 4 5 Accuracy of interpretation of images as presented TP TN FP FN Accuracy of interpretation of images as compared to gold standard (ie, CT, operative report) TP TN FP FN

Comments: ___________________________________________________________________

Page 19: Emergency Ultrasound Standard Reporting Guidelines - ACEP

FOCUSED THORACIC

The elements that are BOLDED represent the core emergency ACEP views, findings and interpretations for each application.

Patient/ exam demographics:

Patient name: ________________________ Patient gender: M F DOB: ___ / ___ / ___ MR#: ___________________ Bar Code/Patient Identifier:______________ Hospital Name:_______________ Date and time of exam: ___ / ___ / ___ Exam type: Diagnostic Educational Procedural Clinical category: Resuscitative Symptom based Therapeutic

Unknown/ other Initial exam Repeat exam Primary person obtaining/ interpreting images: __________________ Secondary person obtaining/ interpreting images: __________________ Additional person(s) obtaining/ interpreting images: __________________

dyspnea hypotension Indication(s) for exam:

chest pain blunt thoracic trauma pleurisy penetrating thoracic trauma hypoxia educational other: ____________________________

Right anterior/ superior thorax: adequate limited not obtained Views:

Right lateral/ inferior thorax: adequate limited not obtained Left anterior/ superior thorax: adequate limited not obtained Left lateral/ inferior thorax: adequate limited not obtained

other: ___________________________

Right thorax Findings:

lung sliding: present absent indeterminate lung point sign: present absent indeterminate Interstitium: a-lines: present absent indeterminate b-lines: present absent indeterminate anterior/ superior region: present (greater than 3 per view) absent inferior/ lateral region: present (greater than 3 per view) absent pleural effusion: present absent indeterminate If present: small large

Page 20: Emergency Ultrasound Standard Reporting Guidelines - ACEP

anechoic complex lung consolidation: present absent indeterminate air bronchograms: present absent indeterminate

other: ______ Left thorax lung sliding: present absent indeterminate lung point sign: present absent indeterminate Interstitium: a-lines: present absent indeterminate b-lines: present absent indeterminate anterior/ superior region: present (greater than 3 per view) absent inferior/ lateral region: present (greater than 3 per view) absent pleural effusion: present absent indeterminate If present: small large anechoic complex lung consolidation: present absent indeterminate air bronchograms: present absent indeterminate

other: ____________________________

No sonographic evidence of acute pulmonary disease Interpretation:

Pneumothorax left right bilateral Pleural effusion left right bilateral Alveolar interstitial syndrome (focal) Alveolar interstitial syndrome (diffuse) Lung consolidation left right bilateral other: _______

Quality assurance:

Suggested Quality Assurance Grading Scale

1 2 3 4 5 Grading Scale Definitions

No recognizable structures, no objective data can be gathered

Minimally recognizable structures but insufficient for diagnosis

Minimal criteria met for diagnosis, recognizable structures but with some technical or other flaws

Minimal criteria met for diagnosis, all structures imaged well and diagnosis easily supported

Minimal criteria met for diagnosis, all structures imaged with excellent image quality and diagnosis completely supported

Image quality 1 2 3 4 5 Accuracy of interpretation of images as presented TP TN FP FN Accuracy of interpretation of images as compared to gold standard (ie, CT, operative report) TP TN FP FN

Comments: ___________________________________________________________________

Page 21: Emergency Ultrasound Standard Reporting Guidelines - ACEP

FOCUSED LOWER EXTREMITY VENOUS

The elements that are BOLDED represent the core emergency ACEP views, findings and interpretations for each application.

Patient/ exam demographics:

Patient name: ________________________ Patient gender: M F DOB: ___ / ___ / ___ MR#: ___________________ Bar Code/Patient Identifier:______________ Hospital Name:_____________________ Date and time of exam: ___ / ___ / ___ Exam type: Diagnostic Educational Procedural Clinical category: Resuscitative Symptom based Therapeutic

Unknown/ other Initial exam Repeat exam Primary person obtaining/ interpreting images: __________________ Secondary person obtaining/ interpreting images: __________________ Additional person(s) obtaining/ interpreting images: __________________

leg pain: left right bilateral Indication(s) for exam:

leg swelling: left right bilateral leg erythema: left right bilateral dyspnea tachypnea pleurisy educational other: ________

Right saphenofemoral junction: adequate limited not obtained Views:

Right common femoral vein: adequate limited not obtained Right femoral vein: adequate limited not obtained Right popliteal vein: adequate limited not obtained Right popliteal trifurcation: adequate limited not obtained Left saphenofemoral junction: adequate limited not obtained Left common femoral vein: adequate limited not obtained Left femoral vein: adequate limited not obtained Left popliteal vein: adequate limited not obtained Left popliteal trifurcation: adequate limited not obtained other: _________________________________

Findings:

Page 22: Emergency Ultrasound Standard Reporting Guidelines - ACEP

Right leg Saphenofemoral junction: compressible NOT compressible indeterminate Common femoral vein: compressible NOT compressible indeterminate Femoral vein: compressible NOT compressible indeterminate Popliteal vein: compressible NOT compressible indeterminate Popliteal trifurcation: compressible NOT compressible indeterminate

other: ___________________________ Left leg Saphenofemoral junction: compressible NOT compressible indeterminate Common femoral vein: compressible NOT compressible indeterminate Femoral vein: compressible NOT compressible indeterminate Popliteal vein: compressible NOT compressible indeterminate Popliteal trifurcation: compressible NOT compressible indeterminate

other: ___________________________

no sonographic evidence of deep vein thrombosis Interpretation:

DVT present Location(s): R saphenofemoral junction L saphenofemoral junction R CFV L CFV R FV L FV R popliteal L popliteal R popliteal trifurcation L popliteal trifurcation indeterminate for DVT

other: ________

Quality assurance:

Suggested Quality Assurance Grading Scale

1 2 3 4 5 Grading Scale Definitions

No recognizable structures, no objective data can be gathered

Minimally recognizable structures but insufficient for diagnosis

Minimal criteria met for diagnosis, recognizable structures but with some technical or other flaws

Minimal criteria met for diagnosis, all structures imaged well and diagnosis easily supported

Minimal criteria met for diagnosis, all structures imaged with excellent image quality and diagnosis completely supported

Image quality 1 2 3 4 5 Accuracy of interpretation of images as presented TP TN FP FN Accuracy of interpretation of images as compared to gold standard (ie, CT, operative report) TP TN FP FN

Comments: ___________________________________________________________________

Page 23: Emergency Ultrasound Standard Reporting Guidelines - ACEP

FOCUSED CARDIAC ULTRASOUND

The elements that are BOLDED represent the core emergency ACEP views, findings and interpretations for each application.

Patient/ exam demographics:

Patient name: ________________________ Patient gender: M F DOB: ___ / ___ / ___ MR#: ___________________ Bar Code/Patient Identifier:______________ Hospital Name:_____________ Date and time of exam: ___ / ___ / ___ Exam type: Diagnostic Educational Procedural Clinical category: Resuscitative Symptom based Therapeutic

Unknown/ other Initial exam Repeat exam Primary person obtaining/ interpreting images: __________________ Secondary person obtaining/ interpreting images: __________________ Additional person(s) obtaining/ interpreting images: __________________

cardiac arrest chest wall injury Indication(s) for exam:

hypotension dyspnea shock syncope chest pain tachypnea shortness of breath fever tachycardia educational palpitations other: ________________________

Subxiphoid (4 chamber): adequate limited not obtained Views:

Parasternal long axis: adequate limited not obtained Parasternal short axis: adequate limited not obtained Subxiphoid (long axis, IVC view): adequate limited not obtained Apical four-chamber: adequate limited not obtained

other: _________________________

Pericardial effusion: present absent indeterminate size Findings:

if present small moderate large present size not specified Evidence of tamponade IVC plethoric R atrial collapse R ventricular collapse Excessive mitral inflow variation

Page 24: Emergency Ultrasound Standard Reporting Guidelines - ACEP

Global Ventricular Function: hyperdynamic normal reduced severely reduced asystole indeterminate Right Ventricular Size: normal dilated indeterminate Signs of RV strain RV hypokinesis Paradoxical septal motion McConnell’s Sign Tricuspid regurgitation Max velocity: ___m/s RV hypertrophy Thoracic aorta: present absent indeterminate Aortic root: ____mm Thoracic aorta diameter: _____mm IVC: normal dilated collapsed indeterminate Maximum diameter: ____mm Minimum diameter: ____mm Collapse: >50% <50% other: ________

No sonographic evidence of significant cardiac dysfunction Interpretation:

No sonographic evidence of significant pericardial effusion Pericardial effusion small moderate large present size not specified Pericardial effusion with evidence of pericardial tamponade Global ventricular function: hyperdynamic normal reduced severely reduced No cardiac activity/ Cardiac standstill No sonographic evidence of RV size dilation RV dilation No sonographic evidence of volume depletion Sonographic findings suggestive of volume depletion Dilated IVC No evidence of sonographic aortic root dilation Dilated Aortic Root other: _________________________________

Quality assurance:

Suggested Quality Assurance Grading Scale

1 2 3 4 5 Grading Scale Definitions

No recognizable structures, no objective data can be gathered

Minimally recognizable structures but insufficient for diagnosis

Minimal criteria met for diagnosis, recognizable structures but with some technical or other flaws

Minimal criteria met for diagnosis, all structures imaged well and diagnosis easily supported

Minimal criteria met for diagnosis, all structures imaged with excellent image quality and diagnosis completely supported

Page 25: Emergency Ultrasound Standard Reporting Guidelines - ACEP

Image quality 1 2 3 4 5 Accuracy of interpretation of images as presented TP TN FP FN Accuracy of interpretation of images as compared to gold standard (ie, CT, operative report) TP TN FP FN

Comments: ___________________________________________________________________

Page 26: Emergency Ultrasound Standard Reporting Guidelines - ACEP

SOFT TISSUE/MUSCULOSKELETAL

The elements that are BOLDED represent the core emergency ACEP views, findings and interpretations for each application.

Patient/ exam demographics:

Patient name: ________________________ Patient gender: M F DOB: ___ / ___ / ___ MR#: ___________________ Bar Code/Patient Identifier:______________ Hospital Name:________________ Date and time of exam: ___ / ___ / ___ Exam type: Diagnostic Educational Procedural Clinical category: Resuscitative Symptom based Therapeutic

Unknown/ other Initial exam Repeat exam Primary person obtaining/ interpreting images: __________________ Secondary person obtaining/ interpreting images: __________________ Additional person(s) obtaining/ interpreting images: __________________

Swelling Mass Decreased Range of Motion Indication(s) for exam:

Redness Fever Deformity Pain Foreign Body Educational other: ________

Skin and subcutaneous tissue: adequate limited not obtained Views:

Muscle: adequate limited not obtained Tendon: adequate limited not obtained Joint: adequate limited not obtained Bone: adequate limited not obtained

other: __________________________

Skin and subcutaneous tissue: Findings:

Tissue thickness normal thickened indeterminate Thickness ________mm Tissue Echogenicity normal increased indeterminate Cobblestoning normal increased indeterminate Subcutaneous Collection present absent indeterminate If present Diameter _______mm Muscle: Appearance normal irregular indeterminate Echogenicity normal increased indeterminate

Page 27: Emergency Ultrasound Standard Reporting Guidelines - ACEP

Collection present absent indeterminate Tendon: Appearance normal irregular indeterminate Defect present absent indeterminate Joint: fluid no fluid indeterminate Bone: Cortex Appearance normal irregular indeterminate If irregular aligned angulated/misaligned

other: ___________________________

No sonographic evidence of soft tissue abnormality Interpretation:

No sonographic evidence of musculoskeletal abnormality Cellulitis location:__________ Abscess location:__________ Joint Effusion location:__________ Tendon Injury complete partial indeterminate Fractured Bone location:__________ other: ________

Quality assurance:

Suggested Quality Assurance Grading Scale

1 2 3 4 5 Grading Scale Definitions

No recognizable structures, no objective data can be gathered

Minimally recognizable structures but insufficient for diagnosis

Minimal criteria met for diagnosis, recognizable structures but with some technical or other flaws

Minimal criteria met for diagnosis, all structures imaged well and diagnosis easily supported

Minimal criteria met for diagnosis, all structures imaged with excellent image quality and diagnosis completely supported

Image quality 1 2 3 4 5 Accuracy of interpretation of images as presented TP TN FP FN Accuracy of interpretation of images as compared to gold standard (ie, CT, operative report) TP TN FP FN

Comments: ___________________________________________________________________

Page 28: Emergency Ultrasound Standard Reporting Guidelines - ACEP

OCULAR

The elements that are BOLDED represent the core emergency ACEP views, findings and interpretations for each application.

Patient/exam demographics:

Patient name: ________________________ Patient gender: M F DOB: ___ / ___ / ___ MR#: ___________________ Bar Code/Patient Identifier:______________ Hospital Name:_________________ Date and time of exam: ___ / ___ / ___ Exam type: Diagnostic Educational Procedural Clinical category: Resuscitative Symptom based Therapeutic

Unknown/ other Initial exam Repeat exam Primary person obtaining/ interpreting images: __________________ Secondary person obtaining/ interpreting images: __________________ Additional person(s) obtaining/ interpreting images: __________________

eye pain head injury Indication(s) for exam:

eye/orbital trauma suspected foreign body vision change headache visual loss educational other: ________

Right eye transverse: adequate limited not obtained Views:

Right eye longitudinal: adequate limited not obtained Left eye transverse: adequate limited not obtained Left eye longitudinal: adequate limited not obtained

other: ________

Right eye Findings:

Retinal contour: normal abnormal/ detached indeterminate Lens: normally located dislodged indeterminate Vitreous body: anechoic hyperechoic density indeterminate Optic nerve sheath: enlarged normal indeterminate ONSD: ____mm

other: ________ Left eye Retinal contour: normal abnormal/ detached indeterminate

Page 29: Emergency Ultrasound Standard Reporting Guidelines - ACEP

Lens: normally located dislodged indeterminate Vitreous body: anechoic hyperechoic density indeterminate Optic nerve sheath: enlarged normal indeterminate ONSD: ____mm

other: ________________________________

No acute abnormalities identified Interpretation:

Retinal Detachment left right bilateral Lens dislocation left right bilateral Vitreous Hemorrhage left right bilateral Intraocular Foreign body left right bilateral Increased ONSD left right bilateral other: ________

Quality assurance:

Suggested Quality Assurance Grading Scale

1 2 3 4 5 Grading Scale Definitions

No recognizable structures, no objective data can be gathered

Minimally recognizable structures but insufficient for diagnosis

Minimal criteria met for diagnosis, recognizable structures but with some technical or other flaws

Minimal criteria met for diagnosis, all structures imaged well and diagnosis easily supported

Minimal criteria met for diagnosis, all structures imaged with excellent image quality and diagnosis completely supported

Image quality 1 2 3 4 5 Accuracy of interpretation of images as presented TP TN FP FN Accuracy of interpretation of images as compared to gold standard (ie, CT, operative report) TP TN FP FN Comments: ___________________________________________________________________


Recommended