0For institutional investor and financial advisor use only.
Not for further distribution.
January 2020
Emerging Markets Debt 2020 Outlook
For institutional investor and financial advisor use only.
Nor for further distribution.
1For institutional investor and financial advisor use only.
Not for further distribution.
Executive summary
Emerging Markets Debt 2020 Outlook
While the Emerging Markets (EM) asset class has been impacted by a slew of negative events
in 2019, performance ended the year with impressive double digit returns across both hard and
local debt assets.
In order to assess the outlook for the EMD asset class in 2020, it is important to understand the
drivers of the strong performance this year. Global risk sentiment returned in early 2019 fueled
by attractive valuations entering the year, the more dovish tones from the Federal Reserve, a
sharp decline in US 10-year Treasury yields, a stable US dollar, and finally the ongoing trade
negotiations between the US and China with the most recent “Phase 1” deal agreement.
The outlook for the global macro environment should be marginally supportive of EM growth in
2020. We expect a slight pickup in global growth and while we have reason to be somewhat
optimistic, we do not expect a significant growth breakout. Over the past few years, inflation has
persistently fallen across DM and EM and while we do not forecast a steep rise in inflation, we
do acknowledge that the efficacy of easy monetary policy is limited and that we may be close to
the lower bound in terms of monetary easing going forward. With respect to the impact of the
US-China trade tensions on the macro environment, the recent announcement of the “Phase 1”
deal does remove some uncertainty and looking ahead there could be some updraft in growth
on account of negative output gaps. While a re-escalation of the trade war is not our base case,
it certainly remains a risk, particularly as the US heads into Presidential elections this year.
Lastly, the fundamentals in emerging market countries are a mixed picture with some of larger
economies likely to experience a decent recovery while select high yield economies will
continue to be dependent of portfolio flows in the near future.
In this article we combine these assessments with our valuation analysis to construct our thesis
for EMD assets across hard currency and local debt in 2020. Based on our outlook, we are
beginning the year with a slightly constructive view on the EMD asset class as a whole.
However, we acknowledge that the risk premium across the asset class has shrunk and is also
not uniform and we do not intend to keep our positioning static as the year progresses.
2For institutional investor and financial advisor use only.
Not for further distribution.
Introduction
Emerging Markets Debt 2020 Outlook
When one considers the numerous headwinds that buffeted markets through much of 2019, the
strong performance of the Emerging Markets Debt (EMD) asset class seems even more
surprising. There were plenty of negative events throughout the year including an escalation of
trade hostilities between the US and China; a slowdown in global growth and growth
expectations; geopolitical flashpoints around the Middle East; and the rise in social unrest
across Latin America, Hong Kong, Lebanon, and Iraq. In addition, there were numerous
idiosyncratic events such as the huge financial and economic slump in Argentina following the
surprising results of the primary elections. In the face of these risks surfacing, 2019 EMD
performance was nothing short of stunning:
Impressive performance was not been limited to just EMD in 2019, for example US HY BB/B
credits returned 15.10 % (ICE BofA BB-B HY Index), US IG corporates returned 14.23% (ICE
BofA US Corporate Index), and the S&P had a 31% total return in the year. As we think about
the outlook for EMD in 2020, it behooves us to first take a look back at the main drivers of these
strong returns in 2019:
FOMC pivot – the Federal Reserve changed direction in early 2019 from a hiking bias to a
“mid-cycle adjustment” of cutting rates three times over the course of the year, which has
clearly been a very important driver for returns across asset classes
Decline in US Treasury yields – US 10-year Treasury yields declined by over 70bps in 2019
due to the downward pressure exerted by slowing global growth and negative yields across
many developed markets (DM) countries. This compression also contributed to positive
performance as exemplified in the EM hard currency sovereign return: the benchmark (JPM
EMBIG) has a duration of 7.75 years and as a result, the compression of US Treasury yields
accounted for approximately 6% of total returns for the asset class in 2019
Attractive valuations in EM – Entering 2019, valuations for EMD assets had become
inordinately cheap following the sell-off that began in Q3 2018. Sovereign spreads widened
almost 100bps during the period, resulting in very attractive valuations relative both to peers
and to historical levels. Additionally, real rates in the EM local space were enticing at almost
2% compared to -1% for the developed world at the beginning of 2019
USD stability – The USD rallied approximately 5% in trade-weighted terms (DXY) in 2018,
but was broadly stable through 2019, allowing for the removal of a significant headwind for
risk assets overall
US-China “Phase 1” trade deal – While we do believe that a long-term resolution of the
deteriorating US-China relationship is going to prove elusive in the near future [refer to our
earlier paper “Tariffs, Trade and Beyond: The US-China Challenge”], the recent
announcement of a “Phase 1” deal has reduced some uncertainty from the global economy
and markets. Since the announcement of the deal, sovereign spreads have rallied by about
40bps with HY sovereign spreads moving almost a 100bps tighter, evidence of a less
pessimistic outlook
Asset Class Index YTD USD return
Hard Currency Sovereign JPM EMBIG 14.42%
Hard Currency Corporates JPM CEMBIG BD 13.09%
Local Currency Bonds JPM GBI EM GD 13.47%
Local Currency JPM ELMI+ 5.20%
Source: JPMorgan, Bloomberg, HSBC Global Asset Management. Benchmark returns as of 31 December 2019.
3For institutional investor and financial advisor use only.
Not for further distribution.
EMD in 2020 – Where do we go from here?
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Source: International Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook Database, October 15, 2019.
G4 is China, Euro area, Japan, United States. Forecasts, projections or targets are indicative only and are not guaranteed in any way.
HSBC Global Asset Management accepts no liability for any failure to meet such forecasts, projections or targets.
Long time EM investors are keenly aware that the top-down macroeconomic environment is as
important as bottom-up country fundamentals when considering the outlook for EMD. As such,
we will assess our expectations for the macroeconomic outlook in this section across global
growth, central bank policy and global trade tensions.
Macroeconomic outlook:
A. Global Growth
We expect a slight pickup in global growth in 2020 driven by the following factors:
Trade headwinds starting to dissipate
Positive effects from monetary easing by global central banks with some lag in the real
economy
Negative output gaps beginning to shrink slightly
Countries with fiscal room starting to use some of that to support growth
In the IMF’s latest WEO (Figure 1), global growth is projected to pick up slightly to 3.4% in
2020, compared to 3% in 2019. This is expected to be driven by EM with growth picking up by
about 70bps, while DM economies slow somewhat. Among the larger EM economies, we
expect some growth recovery in countries running negative output gaps such as Brazil, Mexico,
India, South Africa and Russia.
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Figure 1. GDP Growth: World and G4
World G4
GD
P
4For institutional investor and financial advisor use only.
Not for further distribution.
Macroeconomic Outlook – Growth
High frequency PMI data shows early signs of a small pickup in both services and manufacturing (Figure 2).
Services have clearly held up better overall, which is perhaps expected given the larger domestic component in
services in an environment where global trade has been week. While it is too early to say that the recovery in
manufacturing can be sustained through 2020, there seems to be a small upward trend.
Despite there being no shortage of pessimism as it relates to growth in EM, the chart below (Figure 3) tells a
starkly different story, demonstrating the resilience of EM manufacturing even in a fairly adverse environment,
especially when compared to DM.
46
48
50
52
54
56
58
Services PMIs
EZ Ser US Ser EM Ser China Ser
45
47
49
51
53
55
57
Manufacturing PMIs
EZ Man US Man EM Man China Man
Figure 2.
-3.0
-2.5
-2.0
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
January-12 January-13 January-14 January-15 January-16 January-17 January-18 January-19
Figure 3. Headline manufacturing PMIs (st. dev. from mean)
Developed Markets Emerging Markets
Source: Bloomberg, Markit, HSBC Global Asset Management as of 31 December 2019.
5For institutional investor and financial advisor use only.
Not for further distribution.
25
35
45
55
65
75
October-99 October-04 October-09 October-14 October-19
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
Figure 7. Investment and uncertainty
Private domestic investment, yoy%(LHS)
Conf. Board CEO Confidence Index, 2Q lag(RHS)
Macroeconomic Outlook – Growth
In terms of market expectations however, data has continued to surprise lower in EM (Figure 4),
as measured by surprise indices, while Europe seems to be recovering somewhat relative to
rock-bottom expectations.
Within the EM universe though, it is interesting to note that Latin America shows an improving
trend while Asia seems to lag relative to expectations (Figure 5).
In terms of the growth outlook for the major economies of US, Eurozone and China, we find the
picture that emerges is slightly different from the headlines. In the US for example, while headline
growth seems robust and trend line, this is almost exclusively consumption led (Figure 6) while
business confidence is close to the Global Financial Crisis lows (Figure 7). This is one of the
reasons that while we are not predicting an imminent recession in the US, we do believe that the
US could underperform relative to expectations.
-150
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
January-18 August-18 March-19 October-19
Figure 4. Economic Surprise Indices
UNITED STATES EUROGlobal ChinaEMERGING MARKETS
-100
-50
0
50
100
January-18 August-18 March-19 October-19
Figure 5. Economic Surprise Indices
Latin America CEEMEA
Asia Pacific BRIC
Source: Bloomberg, HSBC Global Asset Management as of 31 December 2019.
Lowest confidence
since GFC-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4Figure 6. US quarterly GDP contributions
GDP ex-consumption (G + l +X - M)Personal ConsumptionHeadline GDP
2016 2017 2018 2019| | |
6For institutional investor and financial advisor use only.
Not for further distribution.
Macroeconomic Outlook – Growth
The Eurozone has been a clear underperformer over the year as growth has continued to be stagnant (Figure 8).
However, much of this malaise can be traced to the German manufacturing sector. While Germany has been
unwilling to employ any fiscal stimulus given their self-imposed “Black-Zero” budget, we do think that with inflation
far below target and employment starting to get impacted, there is some likelihood Germany will loosen the purse-
strings (Figures 9 & 10).
Source: Bloomberg, HSBC Global Asset Management as of 31 December 2019.
4.75
5.00
5.25
5.50
5.75
6.00
6.25
6.50
6.75
7.00
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
1.25
1.50
1.75
2.00
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Figure 10. German labor market rolling over?
Employment % 6m annualized(LHS)
Unemployment rate %(RHS)
-0.1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
Q1 Q2 Q3
Figure 8. Eurozone GDP growth
Germany France Spain Italy EZ
Estimate
-2.5
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
January-10 January-13 January-16 January-19
Figure 9. Manufacturing at the heart of Eurozone-Germany differential
PMI manufacturing new orders
(st. dev. from mean)
Eurozone
ex-Germany
Germany
7For institutional investor and financial advisor use only.
Not for further distribution.
Macroeconomic Outlook – Growth
In China, we are seeing some improvement in domestic conditions given the recovery in imports while the consumption sector
continues to be fairly resilient. Infrastructure investment is clearly weaker though some pickup should be expected from policy
support going forward. Policy makers have flexibility as core inflation is well contained and stable. As such, while we do not expect
a sharp growth spurt, we do expect growth in China to be resilient and on a slightly improving trend (Figures 11-14).
Growth Summary
Looking at the global growth picture, we have reason to be slightly optimistic for 2020 though we do not expect a signficant growth
breakout .
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
Jun 14 Jun 15 Jun 16 Jun 17 Jun 18 Jun 19
Figure 13. China: select consumption-related indicators
NBS online retail sales - goods & services (LHS)Passenger car sales volume (LHS)Real retail sales (RHS)
% yoy % yoy
-8
-3
2
7
12
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Jan 10 Jan 12 Jan 14 Jan 16 Jan 18
Figure 14. China: inflation readings
Headline (LHS) Core (LHS)Service (LHS) Food (RHS)PPI (RHS)
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Jan 14 Jan 16 Jan 18
Figure 12. China: fixed asset investment (FAI): infrastructure
Power and utility Infrastructure (NBS)
% yoy (ytd)
% yoy % yoy
Source: Macrobond, Bloomberg, HSBC Global Asset Management as of 31 December 2019.
60
70
80
90
100
110
Jan-13 Jan-15 Jan-17 Jan-19
Figure 11. Domestic demand improving, albeit slowly
China – ordinary imports (USD bn, SA)
3 month
moving average
8For institutional investor and financial advisor use only.
Not for further distribution.
Macroeconomic Outlook – DM Central Bank Policy
B. DM Central Bank Policy
In the past few years, inflation has continued to fall across DM and EM, as has inflation volatility (Figures 15 & 16). This has
permitted central banks to keep policy mostly accommodative. Over the course of 2019, inflation has mostly undershot inflation
targets (Figure 17).
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Dec-80 Dec-86 Dec-92 Dec-98 Dec-04 Dec-10 Dec-16
Figure 15. Inflation in DM in % y/y(Euro area before 1997 based on aggregation from
country data using PPP GDP as weights)
US Euro Area Japan
0
5
10
15
20
25
Jan-00 Jan-03 Jan-06 Jan-09 Jan-12 Jan-15 Jan-18
Figure 16. Standard deviation of inflation by country group
Emerging markets Developed markets
-2.5
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
US Can UK EZ Kor Jpn Aus Tha Mex ZAF Bra Chn
Latest core inflation
pp deviation in y/y inflation from target
2% target 2.5% target
3% to 4.5% target
Dec 18 core inflation
Figure 17. Missing the target
Source: IIF, Bloomberg, HSBC Global Asset Management as of 31 December 2019.
9For institutional investor and financial advisor use only.
Not for further distribution.
Macroeconomic Outlook – DM Central Bank Policy
& Global Trade Relations
Looking to 2020, while we do not forecast a steep rise in inflation, we acknowledge that the efficacy of easy
monetary policy is limited going forward and we may be close to the lower-bound in terms of monetary
easing. Additionally, markets seem to be pricing in cuts and, in the unlikely event central banks are more
dovish than expected, we believe this would be the result of an environment of very weak growth.
Therefore, we do not believe we will see a similar lift for risk assets from policy rates in 2020.
C. Global trade tensions or Deglobalization
US-China trade tensions resulted in about 0.7% drag to the global economy and about 0.5% for the US
economy in 2019 according to estimates from Bank of America. As previously mentioned, while we do not
believe that a full resolution will be forthcoming in 2020, the announcement of the “Phase 1” trade deal
certainly does lift some of the uncertainty from the macro environment. As such, there could be some
momentum in growth in 2020 beyond the cyclical lift resulting from negative output gaps. While a re-
escalation of the trade war is not our base case, it certainly remains a risk, particularly as the US heads into
Presidential elections. There is a small likelihood that a polarized political climate in the US could lead to a
hardening of positions, particularly as the view of an increasingly adversarial relationship with China seems
to be shared on both sides of the aisle. Broadly speaking, ironically enough, the trend toward nationalism
and protectionism seems to be a global phenomenon that we do not feel will reverse any time soon. Clearly,
this does not augur well for EM economies.
Putting together the various pieces of the global macro environment, we conclude that this should be
marginally supportive of EM growth this year, though it is hard to see a “V-shaped” recovery. While we think
that a combination of these factors should support EMD assets in the first half of the year, we should
temper our expectations of very strong performance.
AMER Policy RateEffective
RateBasis
3/31/203M
6/30/206M
9/30/209M
12/31/2012M
USD 1.63% 1.55% -0.08% 1.63% 1.58% 1.53% 1.49%
CAD 1.75% 1.78% 0.03% 1.68% 1.65% 1.63% 1.66%
MXN 7.25% 7.56% 0.31% 6.93% 6.61% 6.44% 6.31%
EMEA Policy RateEffective
RateBasis
3/31/203M
6/30/206M
9/30/209M
12/31/2012M
EUR 0.00% -0.45% -0.45% 0.00% -0.01% 0.00% 0.01%
GBP 0.75% 0.71% -0.04% 0.72% 0.67% 0.64% 0.63%
PLN 1.50% 1.71% 0.21% 1.47% 1.46% 1.45% 1.54%
ZAR 6.50% 6.80% 0.30% 6.31% 6.24% 6.19% 6.20%
TRY 12.00% 11.02% -0.98% 12.48% 12.92% 13.31% 13.64%
RUB 6.25% 6.45% 0.20% 6.34% 6.23% 5.97% 6.06%
APAC Policy RateEffective
RateBasis
3/31/203M
6/30/206M
9/30/209M
12/31/2012M
CNY 4.35% 3.00% -1.35% 4.45% 4.49% 4.52% 4.56%
JPY -0.07% -0.05% 0.02% -0.06% -0.06% -0.06% -0.06%
INR 5.15% 5.24% 0.09% 5.18% 5.13% 5.08% 5.20%
Figure 18. Market implied rates
Source: Bloomberg, HSBC Global Asset Management as of 31 December 2019.
10For institutional investor and financial advisor use only.
Not for further distribution.
Emerging Market Fundamentals
EM fundamentals have shown mixed trends across various metrics over the past year. On the whole, growth and activity
have held up reasonably well given the external environment, as noted earlier. In fact, we believe that the growth
differential between EM and DM will continue to widen in EM’s favor in the year ahead, which should support demand for
the asset class (Figure 19).
Overall EM countries have held up well on metrics such as external debt to GDP ratio, which has stabilized; budget and
currency account balances, which are on an improving trend; and import coverage, which is healthy and improving
(Figures 20 & 21).
Additionally, the credit quality of the EM universe improved in 2019 with the inclusion of higher-income Gulf Cooperation
Council (GCC) economies in EM external debt indices (JPM EMBI). Many of these economies have experienced an
improvement in their economic metrics as oil prices recovered somewhat in 2019.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Source: International Monetary Fund, Haver, HSBC Global Asset Management,
December 31, 2019. Forecasts, projections or targets are indicative only and are not guaranteed in any way. HSBC Global Asset Management accepts no
liability for any failure to meet such forecasts, projections or targets.
% b
udget
bala
nce o
f G
DP
-4
-3.5
-3
-2.5
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
Figure 20. Budget balances are on improving trend
Govt/Budget Balance % of GDP
Exte
rnal debt
% o
f G
DP
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4Figure 21. EM current accounts have
stabilized
CA Balance
11For institutional investor and financial advisor use only.
Not for further distribution.
Emerging Market Fundamentals
On the other hand, there has also been a deterioration in some fundamentals, including the overall levels of debt. This
has been enabled by the abundant availability of cheap financing on account of DM central bank largesse (Figure 22).
Idiosyncratic stories in the lower-rated EM countries caused concern in 2019, led by Argentina. In the first half of 2019,
Argentina began to show improvements in terms of inflationary dynamics as well as a more orthodox mix of economic
policy. However, this was thrown off-course following the surprising results in the primary elections in August 2019 and
the subsequent election of the opposition candidate Alberto Fernandez to the Presidency. New policy indications so far
do not justify the extremely pessimistic market pricing following the election, but the fact remains that Argentina requires
debt relief to achieve a sustainable fiscal path. Furthermore, macroeconomic policies will need to walk a fine line between
supporting growth in the domestic economy and satisfying global capital markets to which Argentina must maintain
access.
Lebanon is another economy with significant challenges. The country is running double-digit twin deficits and has recently
seen its existing governing structure face extraordinary challenges. At this point, there does not seem to be a clearly
identifiable political path going forward with the country split along sectarian lines and facing a significant credibility deficit
among market participants. In the absence of foreign currency inflows, it is very hard to see how Lebanon can support its
massive debt burden, which is why we remain underweight the country.
15
25
35
45
55
65
75
85
95
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Figure 22. Debt levels have risen
Households Debt % GDP Government Debt % GDP
Non-Financial Corp Debt % GDP
Debt
/ G
DP
(%
)
Source: IIF, HSBC Global Asset Management as of 31 December 2019.
12For institutional investor and financial advisor use only.
Not for further distribution.
Emerging market fundamentals
Another area to watch for is the single B-rated sector in EM, where fundamentals have been mixed at best. While there
has been some fiscal consolidation over the past few years, growth has been uninspiring and interest expense as a
percentage of revenue has grown sharply given the large amount of issuance highlighted earlier (Figures 23-26).
Other key factors that will impact EMD in 2020 include policy reforms and social unrest. One positive point for EM
countries is the likelihood of meaningful structural reforms going forward. These began in 2019, with the pension system
reform in Brazil, which helped ensure long term fiscal stability, as well as reforms in Ukraine and Egypt. There had been
hope of long-term reforms in Argentina, which was waylaid in a spectacular fashion as voters rejected such severe
austerity in the midst of a deep recession. We do believe that there is potential for further reforms, especially in Brazil
where the reform agenda remains very ambitious including administrative reform to cut expenditures and tax reform.
Similarly, South Africa is in need of dire structural reforms, including a resolution of a possible land appropriation bill and
reforms related to the state-owned utility company, Eskom. In both India and Indonesia, there is a recognition of the need
for labor reform. It would be foolhardy to believe that all such reforms can be accomplished in 2020, but given the
urgency in certain circumstances, we are cautiously hopeful some progress will be made.
In 2019, we saw a meaningful escalation in social tensions across countries, which presents a risk to passing unpopular
reforms thus aggravating the situation even further. We feel this risk is especially elevated across a wide variety of
countries including Turkey, India, Brazil, Colombia, Argentina, South Africa and Egypt due to a combination of
demographic and economic factors. As a result, we have tempered our enthusiasm for meaningful reform that could lift
the long-term trajectory for countries.
Fundamentals Summary
Overall, macroeconomic fundamentals in EM are a mixed bag with some of the larger economies set to show a decent
recovery and frontier or frontier-like economies continuing to be dependent on portfolio flows in the near future. A growth
pick up in 2020 would likely lead to a marginal improvement in these fundamentals.
-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 Figure 23. GDP Growth %
GDP Growth % Avg
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
20%
22%
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Figure 24. Int Exp % of Rev
Int Exp % of Rev Avg
40%
45%
50%
55%
60%
65%
70%
75%Figure 25. EXD % of GDP
EXD % of GDP Avg
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
20%Figure 26. Reserves % GDP
Reserves % GDP Avg
Source: Haver, HSBC Global Asset Management as of 31 December 2019.
13For institutional investor and financial advisor use only.
Not for further distribution.
Expectations across EMD Sectors – Hard Currency
To construct our outlook across EMD sectors for 2020, we have combined our assessment of macro-events and
economic fundaments with our expectations for valuations.
Hard Currency Sovereigns
Spreads on EM hard currency sovereigns compressed by almost 150bps in 2019 (JPM EMBIG), with the IG sector
tightening by approximately 80bps while the HY sector experienced 220bps of spread tightening, though excluding
Argentina and Venezuela the spread compression was only 70 bps. At current valuations, we do not believe IG spreads
offer much value with a few exceptions, such as Mexico and Saudi Arabia where we believe further outperformance is
warranted. In addition to IG valuations appearing expensive relative to historic levels, when compared to peers in DM,
they do not seem particularly attractive (Figure 27).
In HY, particularly in the BB-rated segment, we believe there is room for further spread compression, especially when
compared to peers in DM. In the BB-rated space for example, EM credits provide close to a 80bps premium in spread
compensation compared to the average 20bps over the last five years (Figure 28). In the single B-rated space, we do not
find valuations particularly compelling, with only a few exceptions.
Our overall stance in EM hard currency is slightly constructive with an expectation for some spread compression,
focused in the HY sector.
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Dec-13 Dec-14 Dec-15 Dec-16 Dec-17 Dec-18
Figure 27. EM IG vs US IG
EM IG - US IG Average
-150
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
Dec-13 Dec-14 Dec-15 Dec-16 Dec-17 Dec-18
Figure 28. EM HY BB vs US HY BB
EM BB - US BB Average
Source: JP Morgan, BofA Merrill Lynch, Bloomberg, HSBC Global Asset Management as of 31 December 2019.
Spre
ad d
iffe
rentia
lS
pre
ad d
iffe
rentia
l
14For institutional investor and financial advisor use only.
Not for further distribution.
Expectations across EMD Sectors – Local Currencies
Local currency debt
A) Local Currencies
In the local currency space, we find overall valuations to be slightly attractive, but not particularly cheap as measured by
REER (Figure 29). Compared to other EMD sectors, the 2019 performance of EM currencies was somewhat
underwhelming as currencies were actually marginally weaker on a spot basis, and the positive return was driven by the
carry on these currencies.
When analyzing the long-term evolution of REERs (Figure 30), it does seem that the USD is overvalued and would
therefore justify a long EM FX position. However, there is a key risk of further episodes of risk aversion in the market
which would cause a safe haven bid for the USD.
Within the EM FX asset class, there are currencies that are currently screening as cheap which should benefit from
improving terms of trade and outperform. Among these we favor certain currencies including the Brazilian real, Mexican
peso, Russian ruble and Indonesian rupiah. We also have a preference for the Polish zloty as a proxy for the EUR, which
we believe to be undervalued relative to the USD. The EM currencies we feel are expensive or overvalued include the
Singapore dollar, Taiwanese dollar, Israeli shekel and Romanian leu.
Going forward, we believe that in order for EM FX to outperform meaningfully, there needs to be a generalized
debasement of the USD given the long-term correlation between the DXY and EM FX spot rate (Figure 31).
60.0
80.0
100.0
120.0
140.0
January-10 January-13 January-16 January-19
Figure 30. Developed Markets REERs(rebased to 100)
USD REER EUR REER JPY REERUSD Avg EUR Avg Jpy Avg
80
85
90
95
100
105
October-02 October-07 October-12 October-17
Figure 29. EM REER ex Argentina
EM Real Effective Exchange Rate ex Argentina5-year average REER
y = -0.525x - 0.0643
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
-3 -2.5 -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5
JP
M E
MC
I F
ixin
g
DOLLAR INDEX SPOT
Figure 31.
Source: JP Morgan, Bloomberg, HSBC Global Asset Management as of 31 December 2019.
15For institutional investor and financial advisor use only.
Not for further distribution.
Expectations across EMD Sectors – Local Rates
B) Local Rates
Next looking at local rates, we believe that it is highly unlikely there will be a repeat of 2019 where local yields fell
drastically. The decline in EM inflation from about 4.1% to about 3.2% through the year, along with a dovish Fed, allowed
EM central banks to ease rates considerably in 2019, thus contributing to the 120bps rally in EM rates. Real yields (yield
minus inflation) in EM declined from 2% to 0.9 % over 2019. The real yield differential versus DM continues to be stable,
however, it is hard to see that contracting further as we believe EM countries need to maintain an attractive differential to
attract portfolio flows (Figure 32).
EM local rate curves continue to be fairly steep, providing a potential benefit from the roll down effect. Overall we are
neutral on the local rates space, but within the sector, we prefer being long rates in Mexico and Indonesia where real
rates are close to their historic wides. In addition, we currently find South Africa rates attractive given the steepness of the
curve, but this is a more tactical position as we acknowledge the overhang of a possible downgrade to HY which could
lead to outflows. In countries where real rates are extremely negative, like Poland and Hungary, we are underweight local
rates, which provides an efficient way to hedge our long rates exposures.
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
Figure 32. Inflation surprise index
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
141516171819202122232425262728 Figure 33. EM real yield historic ranges (since 2011)*
Real Y
ield
(%
)
*Based upon JPM GBI-EM Global Diversified.
Source: JP Morgan, Bloomberg, HSBC Global Asset Management as of 31 December 2019.
16For institutional investor and financial advisor use only.
Not for further distribution.
Conclusion
Entering 2020, we have a slightly constructive view on the EMD asset class. However, we
acknowledge that the risk premium across the asset class has shrunk and is also not uniform.
Therefore, we do not intend to keep our positioning static as the year progresses. Should we
see further compression in risk premiums, we will look to reduce our positions and possibly
move defensive if the valuation pendulum swings to extremely tight levels. Finally, we do not
pretend to have a crystal ball for the global economy and will continue to monitor markets and
dynamically adjust our positioning to deliver strong risk-adjusted returns for our clients.
17For institutional investor and financial advisor use only.
Not for further distribution.
Key Risks
There is no assurance that a portfolio will achieve its investment objective or will work under all market conditions. The value of
investments may go down as well as up and you may not get back the amount originally invested. Portfolios may be subject to
certain additional risks, which should be considered carefully along with their investment objectives and fees.
Exchange Rate Risk Changes in currency exchange rates could reduce or increase investment gains or investment losses, in
some cases significantly.
Counterparty Risk The possibility that the counterparty to a transaction may be unwilling or unable to meet its obligations.
Liquidity Risk is the risk that a Fund may encounter difficulties meeting its obligations in respect of financial liabilities that are
settled by delivering cash or other financial assets, thereby compromising existing or remaining investors.
Operational Risk may subject the Fund to errors affecting transactions, valuation, accounting, and financial reporting, among
other things.
Derivatives Risk Derivatives can behave unexpectedly. The pricing and volatility of many derivatives may diverge from strictly
reflecting the pricing or volatility of their underlying reference(s), instrument or asset.
Emerging Markets Risk Emerging markets are less established, and often more volatile, than developed markets and involve
higher risks, particularly market, liquidity and currency risks.
Interest Rate Risk When interest rates rise, bond values generally fall. This risk is generally greater the longer the maturity of
a bond investment and the higher its credit quality.
Default Risk The issuers of certain bonds could become unwilling or unable to make payments on their bonds.
Credit Risk A bond or money market security could lose value if the issuer’s financial health deteriorates.
CoCo Bond Risk Contingent convertible securities (CoCo bonds) are comparatively untested, their income payments may be
cancelled or suspended, and they are more vulnerable to losses than equities and can be highly volatile.
This document is for information only and does not constitute investment advice, a solicitation or a recommendation to buy, sell or subscribe to
any investment. It is not intended to provide and should not be relied upon for accounting, legal or tax advice.
HSBC Global Asset Management is the marketing name for the asset management businesses of HSBC Holdings Plc. HSBC Global Asset
Management (USA) Inc. is an investment adviser registered with the US Securities and Exchange Commission.
HSBC Global Asset Management has based this material on information obtained from sources it believes to be reliable but which it has not
independently verified. HSBC Global Asset Management and HSBC Group accept no responsibility as to its accuracy or completeness.
The views expressed were held at the time of preparation and are subject to change without notice.
Forecasts, projections or targets are indicative only and are not guaranteed in any way. HSBC Global Asset Management accepts no liability for
any failure to meet such forecasts, projections or targets.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Index returns do not reflect any fees, expenses or sales charges associated with
investing. Investors cannot invest directly in an index.
In Colombia: HSBC Bank USA NA has an authorized representative by the Superintendencia Financiera de Colombia (SFC) whereby its
activities conform to the General Legal Financial System. SFC has not reviewed the information provided to the investor. This document is for
the exclusive use of institutional investors in Colombia and is not for public distribution. In Peru: HSBC Bank USA NA has an authorized
representative by the Superintendencia de Banca y Seguros in Perú whereby its activities conform to the General Legal Financial System - Law
No. 26702. Funds have not been registered before the Superintendencia del Mercado de Valores (SMV) and are placed by means of a private
offer. SMV has not reviewed the information provided to the investor. This document is for the exclusive use of institutional investors in Perú and
is not for public distribution. In Chile: Operations by HSBC's headquarters or other offices of this bank located abroad are not subject to Chilean
inspections or regulations and are not covered by warranty of the Chilean state. Further information may be obtained about the state guarantee
to deposits at your bank or on www.cmfchile.cl
There are important differences in how the strategy is carried out in each investment vehicle. A separately managed account may not
be suitable for all investors and a minimum asset level is required. Please refer to the Form ADV Part 2A for important information
about the investment adviser.
The contents of this document are confidential and may not be reproduced or further distributed to any person or entity, whether in whole or in
part, for any purpose without prior written permission.
© Copyright 2020. HSBC Global Asset Management. All rights reserved.
Important Information
NOT FDIC INSURED NO BANK GUARANTEE MAY LOSE VALUE
18For institutional investor and financial advisor use only.
Not for further distribution.