Joy Kirchner
COPPUL –
University of
Alber ta
June 10, 2013.
EMERGING OPPORTUNITIES
in Open Scholarship
ACRL Scholarly Communications Roadshow:
From Understanding to Engagement
Identify and examine current models and programming that
support “openness”
Understand new technologies and methods to advance the
creation, flow, dissemination and preservation of scholarly
information
Discuss growing movement towards alternative methods of
measuring impact of scholarship
Explore models you might consider piloting or experimenting
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
Open to contributions and participation
Open and free to access for all
Open to use & reuse w/few or no
restrictions
Open to interoperability & machine
readable
WHAT DO WE MEAN BY OPEN?
PARTICIPATE
in
BUILDING
and
CONTRIBUTE
EXPERTISE
Octocat® is a registered trademark of the GitHub, Inc.
AS
OPPOSED
TO…
are either registered trademarks or
trademarks of Adobe
Systems Incorporated in the United States
and/or other countries.
OPEN
and
FREE TO
ACCESS
©OpenSourceWay, used with permission under CC BY-SA
AS
OPPOSED
TO…
©Amanda Munoz, used with permission under CC-BY
OPEN TO USE
and
REUSE WITH
FEW or NO
RESTRICTIONS
AS
OPPOSED
TO…
OPEN TO USE
and
REUSE WITH
FEW or NO
RESTRICTIONS
©OpenSourceWay, used with permission under CC BY-SA
AS
OPPOSED
TO…
©Wellcome Images, used with permission under CC BY-NC-ND
OPEN TO
MACHINE
READING,
INDEXING,
and
PROCESSING
AS
OPPOSED
TO…
Generally enabled by technology
Works both inside and outside of
traditional models
Supported by a variety of business models
Democratization of information
COMMONALITIES
Open access literature is
digital, online, free of
charge, and free of most
copyright and licensing
restrictions.
- Peter Suber
OPEN ACCESS
Gratis: You can read it for free. Anything else,
you better ask permission.
Libre: With credit given, OK to text-mine, re-
catalog, mirror for preservation, quote, remix,
whatever.
Most OA is gratis. You get to “libre” via
Creative Commons licensing, usually.
( tex t f rom Dorothea Salo )
GRATIS VS. LIBRE
1) Open Access publishing
2) Author self-archiving
2.5) Hybrid open access
publishing
TWO (AND A HALF) ROADS TO
OPEN ACCESS
The winding roads of Spain” by SKI Tripper, CC-BY,
http://www.flickr.com/photos/nzer/2640367659
OPENING THE ACADEMY…
©Taki Steve, used with permission under CC BY
OPEN SCIENCE
OPEN SCIENCE
OPENNESS IN THE SOCIAL SCIENCES
Source: Screengrab from OSM Tasking Manager (http://tasks.hotosm.org/job/196)
OPENNESS IN THE HUMANITIES
© Bettinche, used with permission under CC BY-NC
OPENNESS IN THE HUMANITIES
© Bettinche, used with permission under CC BY-NC
University of Victoria. Internet Shakespeare Editions (http://internetshakespeare.uvic.ca)
INTERDISCIPLINARITY
© Rick Gordon, used with permission under CC NC-ND
MEASURING THE IMPACT OF ‘OPEN’
Source: Screengrab from ImpactStory
INNOVATIONS IN COMMUNICATION
Source: Screengrab from PeerJ and PaperCritic
INNOVATIONS IN COMMUNICATION
Source: Screengrab from Unglueit.com
OPEN BOOK
COLLABORATIVE OPPORTUNITES
COLLABORATIVES TO SUPPORT STEWARDSHIP OF UNIQUE ASSETS
HATHI TRUST
COLLABORATIVE OPPORTUNITES
DISTRIBUTED COLLABORATIVE
NETWORK
Eg. Institute for the Future of the
Book; Biodiversity Heritage
Library
COLLECTIVES TO SUPPORT OPEN
SCHOLARSHIP
COPE
Public Knowledge project
SCOAP3
Collaborative IR’s
(Australia - ARROW, EU -
Openaire)
CONCLUDING REMARKS
Hey, T. , Tans ley, S. , & Tol le , K. The Fourth Paradigm: Data In tensive Sc ient i f ic Discovery. (2009). Redmond, WA: Microsof t Corporat ion. Onl ine: h t tp: / / research.microsof t .com/en -us/col laborat ion/ fourthparadigm/
Housewr ight , R. , Schonfeld , R.C. & Wul fson, K. I thaka S+R US Facul ty Survey 2012 . (8 Apr i l 2013). Onl ine: h t tp: / /www.sr. i thaka.org/research -publ icat ions/us-facul ty-survey-2012
Johnson, L . , Adams Becker, S. , Cummins, M. , Est rada, V. , Freeman, A. , & Ludgate, H. (2013). NMC Hor izon Report : 2013 Higher Educat ion Edi t ion . Aust in, Texas: The New Media Consort ium. Onl ine: h t tp: / /www.nmc.org/publ icat ions/2013-hor izon-report -h igher-ed
Mul l ins, J . L . , Murray-Rust , C. , Ogburn, J . L . , Crow, R. , Iv ins , O. , Mower, A. , Nesdi l l , D. , Newton, M. P. , Speer, J . , & Watk inson, C. (2012). Library Publ ishing Serv ices: St rategies for Success: F ina l Research Report . Washington, DC: SPARC. Onl ine: h t tp: / /docs. l ib.purdue.edu/purduepress_ebooks/24 /
Smith, K.K. & N. L . Maron. Current Models of Dig i ta l Scholar ly Communicat ions: Resul ts o f an Invest igat ion Conducted by I thaka for the Associat ion of Research L ibrar ies. (2008). Onl ine: h t tp: / /www.ar l .org/news/6/1148
RESOURCES
ON THE CARD PROVIDED WRITE DOWN:
5 MINUTES
1. AN OPEN SCHOLARSHIP MODEL YOU WOULD LIKE EVERYONE
TO KNOW ABOUT.
2. URL
3. WHY YOU THINK IT IS IMPORTANT
ACTIVITY
Portions of this work was originally created by Sarah L.
Shreeves and revised by Marisa L. Ramírez and Joy Kirchner on
May 2, 2013. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons
Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States
License. To view a copy of the license see
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by -nc-sa/3.0/us/
ATTRIBUTION