+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Emitec SCR

Emitec SCR

Date post: 10-Mar-2016
Category:
Upload: sergio-antonio-ramirez
View: 171 times
Download: 9 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Emitec Selective Catalytic Reduction system overview.
Popular Tags:

of 32

Transcript
  • High efficiency SCR system for most effective NOx reductionand best fuel economy for on- and off-road applications

    Dr. Ulrich Pfahl, Emitec Inc.Detroit, June 20th, 2012

  • Agenda

    Exhaust Emission Legislation & Strategies SCR System Layout & Development Requirements of Urea Dosing System Air Assisted / Airless Conclusion

  • Agenda

    Exhaust Emission Legislation & Strategies SCR System Layout & Development Requirements of Urea Dosing System Air Assisted / Airless Conclusion

  • Exhaust Emission Legislations & Technologies Example : Commerical Vehicle - ETC

    Engine Technology Euro VI

    P

    M

    [

    m

    g

    /

    k

    W

    h

    ]

    NOx [g/kWh]1

    60

    30

    42 6

    EU V EU IV

    EU VI

    0 3

    F

    u

    e

    l

    C

    o

    n

    s

    u

    m

    p

    t

    i

    o

    n

    High Efficient SCR: > 95%

    Engine Technology Euro IV

  • Agenda

    Exhaust Emission Legislation & Strategies SCR System Layout & Development Requirements of Urea Dosing System Air Assisted / Airless Conclusion

  • SCR System Layout & Development

    Euro IV : > 70% NOx efficiency

    Euro V : > 85% NOx efficiency

    Euro VI : > 95% NOx efficiency DPF/SCR

    S

    L

    I

    P

    Hyd.

    DOC

    SCRS

    L

    I

    P

    DOC

    SCR SilencerSilencer

    SilencerSilencer

    SilencerSilencer

  • SCR Processes

    {(NH2)2CO 7H2O}fl {(NH2)2CO}fl + 7 H2O water evaporation

    {(NH2)2CO}fl HNCO + NH3 thermolysis of urea

    HNCO + H2O CO2 + NH3 hydrolysis of isocyanic acid

    NH3 Formation

    4 NO + O2 + 4 NH3 4 N2 + 6 H2O standard reaction with NO

    2 NO2 + 2 NO + 4 NH3 4 N2 + 6 H2O fast reaction with NO+NO2

    NOX Reduction

    0102030405060708090

    100

    0 100 200 300 400

    Temperature [C]

    N

    O

    x

    C

    o

    n

    v

    e

    r

    s

    i

    o

    n

    R

    a

    t

    e

    [

    %

    ]

    NO2 / NO50%

    NO2 / NO0%

  • SCR Processes

    {(NH2)2CO 7H2O}fl {(NH2)2CO}fl + 7 H2O water evaporation

    {(NH2)2CO}fl HNCO + NH3 thermolysis of urea

    HNCO + H2O CO2 + NH3 hydrolysis of isocyanic acid

    NH3 Formation

    Develop System according to Critical SCR Processes : Good evaporation of DEF optimized amount of DEF injected per time per unit

    targeted area , in order to minimize the temperature loss in the system Optimum hydrolysis of isocyanic acid Preference for Hydrolysis Catalyst Good uniformity of NH3 Optimized Mixing Tube Design

    Adblue Droplet Hitting the Target Surface Evaporation

  • Agenda

    Exhaust Emission Legislation & Strategies SCR System Layout & Development Requirements of Urea Dosing System Air Assisted / Airless Conclusion

  • Key Considerations of Urea Dosing System Design

    Air Assisted / Airless Mass Per Droplet Size

  • Air assisted SCR System: Measured Droplet Size - and Droplet Mass Distribution at 20 l/min Airflow

    Droplet Size Distribution

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    1.2

    0 20 40 60

    R

    e

    l

    a

    t

    i

    v

    e

    D

    i

    s

    t

    r

    i

    b

    u

    t

    i

    o

    n

    D

    e

    n

    s

    i

    t

    y

    Droplet Size in Microns0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    0 10 20 30 40 50 60

    C

    u

    m

    u

    l

    a

    t

    i

    v

    e

    M

    a

    s

    s

    %

    Droplet Size in Microns

    Droplet Mass Distribution

  • 5 m

    70 m

    30 m

    < 5 mm

    1110 mm

    6100 mm

    Evaporation distance requ. at 200 kg/h exhaust mass flow @ 430 C Technical University Munich, tube- 55 mm

  • Key Considerations of Urea Dosing System Design

    Air Assisted / Airless Mass Per Droplet Size

    Temperature Layout Exhaust Gas Temperature ( injector

    location, insulation), Injection Strategy

  • New Conditions for HD Truck Catalyst Systems;Exhaust Gas Temp. EU V / US 2010 (EU VI); 13mode steady state

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800

    T

    e

    m

    p

    .

    u

    p

    s

    t

    r

    e

    a

    m

    S

    C

    R

    C

    a

    t

    [

    C

    ]

    Time [s]

    Oxi-Catalyst

    UreaDosing

    SCR

    EU VI / US 2010 Engine

    EU V Engine

  • Temperature Profile of a Commercial Vehicle with and withoutElectrically Heated Catalyst (EHC): City Driving Cycle

    150

    175

    200

    225

    250

    275

    300

    0 250 500 750 1000 1250 1500 1750 2000t [sec]

    T

    e

    m

    p

    e

    r

    a

    t

    u

    r

    e

    [

    C

    ]

    0

    500

    1000

    1500

    2000

    2500

    3000

    E

    x

    h

    a

    u

    s

    t

    M

    a

    s

    s

    F

    l

    o

    w

    [

    k

    g

    /

    h

    ]

    Exhaust Temperature EHC Not ActiveEhxaust Temperature EHC ActiveExhaust Mass Flow

    Benefit in Temperature with

    EHC

  • Key Considerations of Urea Dosing System Design

    Air Assisted / Airless Mass Per Droplet Size

    Temperature Layout Exhaust Gas Temperature ( injector

    location, insulation), Injection Strategy Mixing Pipe Design - Tasks

    Avoid Deposit formation Good Uniformity Creation of NH3

  • Calculated NOx-Reduction and NH3 Slip as Function of NH3-Uniformity and DEF-Dosing Rate

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    0.88 0.9 0.92 0.94 0.96 0.98 170

    75

    80

    85

    90

    95

    100

    0.88 0.9 0.92 0.94 0.96 0.98 1

    NH3- Slip [ppm]

    NH3-Uniformity

    NOx-Reduction [%]

    NH3-Uniformity

    Alpha = 1.00

  • NOx Reduction @ selected US EPA 13mode / ESC load points

    DEF Injector Initial Layout

    0102030405060708090

    100

    B50 A50 A25 B100 B25 C100 C25

    N

    O

    x

    E

    f

    f

    i

    c

    i

    e

    n

    c

    y

    ,

    %

    ESC Load Point

    DEF Injector New Layout

    0102030405060708090

    100

    B50 A50 A25 B100 B25 C100 C25

    N

    O

    x

    E

    f

    f

    i

    c

    i

    e

    n

    c

    y

    ,

    %

    ESC Load Point

    High Load Points

  • NOx Efficiency with Optimized Airless Dosing Layout & StrategySummary of Sweep Test

    86

    88

    90

    92

    94

    96

    98

    100

    0.85 0.9 0.95 1 1.05

    N

    O

    x

    E

    f

    f

    i

    c

    i

    e

    n

    c

    y

    Alpha (-)

    Test conditions: constant speed / torque

    constant temperature and massflow and exhaust gas condition

    exhaust gas 714 kg/h, T = 420 C, NO x = 543 ppm; NO2/NOx = 0,27theoretical DEF demand for (alpha = 1) = 1100 ml / h

    setup with Fe-Zeolithe catalyst [242 x (110 + 110)] 10,1 ltr

    alpha = 0,87 1.04

  • NH3-distribution Example

    Engine parameters With H-Cat Without H-CatNH3 HNCO NH3 HNCO

    A 25 Load Point:Exh Gas Temp: 310 CExh Gas Massf.: 850 kg/h

    54,7 32,5 17,3 17,9

    Average Concentration

    Hydrolysis Cat ( H-Cat) gives significant Advantage for NH3 formation

    6th ICPC, Graz, 25. - 26.04.2011

  • Catalyst System Validation of Mixing Pipe - Deposits6th ICPC, Graz, 25. - 26.04.2011

    Design w/o Hydrolysis-Catafter 10 h Load point A 25

    Design with Hydrolysis-Catafter 10 h Load point A 25

    Hydr.-Cat outletHydr.-Cat Inlet

  • Liebherr SCR Production System

    watercooledinjector

    hydrolysiscatalyst

    SCR catalyst

    LS Technology

    6th ICPC, Graz, 25. - 26.04.2011

  • Key Considerations of Urea Dosing System Design

    Air Assisted / Airless Mass Per Droplet Size

    Temperature Layout Exhaust Gas Temperature ( injector

    location, insulation), Injection Strategy Mixing Pipe Design - Tasks

    Avoid Deposit formation Good Uniformity Creation of NH3

    SCR Catalyst Structure Conversion Efficiency Ammonia Slip

  • Influence of Cell Structure on NOx Conversion Efficiency

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    200 250 300 350

    Temperature [C]

    N

    O

    x

    C

    o

    n

    v

    e

    r

    s

    i

    o

    n

    E

    f

    f

    i

    c

    i

    e

    n

    c

    y

    [

    %

    ]

    200cpsi Standard200/400cpsi LS

    + 4 %

    + 14%

    2

    0

    0

    c

    p

    s

    i

    2

    0

    0

    /

    4

    0

    0

    L

    S

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    Std LS

    W

    M

    [

    %

    ]

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    160

    Std LS

    [

    %

    ]

    Washcoat Mass Transfer

  • 100

    80

    60

    40

    0

    20

    ConcentrationTracer gas [%]

    Position A Position H

    18 [mm]

    Flow

    Radial Mixing after a substrate length of 18 mm LSPETracer Gas injected into a single Channel; 200kg/h; 300C

    LS/PE-Foil

  • 79

    88

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    Ceramic System Metallic System

    N

    O

    x

    C

    o

    n

    v

    e

    r

    s

    i

    o

    n

    E

    f

    f

    i

    c

    i

    e

    n

    c

    y

    ,

    %

    Comparison of Ceramic and Metallic Systems:NOx-Emission Reduction in ETC

    7. FAD-Konferenz , November 2009

  • 79

    88

    97

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    Ceramic System Metallic System Metallic System, DEF increased 20%

    N

    O

    x

    C

    o

    n

    v

    e

    r

    s

    i

    o

    n

    E

    f

    f

    i

    c

    i

    e

    n

    c

    y

    ,

    %

    Comparison of Ceramic and Metallic Systems:NOx-Emission Reduction in ETC

    7. FAD-Konferenz , November 2009

    Euro VI Development

  • 020

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    160

    180

    200

    N

    H

    3

    -

    S

    l

    i

    p

    ,

    [

    p

    p

    m

    ]

    (

    M

    a

    x

    .

    V

    a

    l

    u

    e

    )

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    40

    45

    50

    N

    H

    3

    -

    S

    l

    i

    p

    ,

    [

    p

    p

    m

    ]

    (

    A

    v

    e

    r

    a

    g

    e

    V

    a

    l

    u

    e

    )Maximum ValueAverage Value

    Ceramic-SCRWith NH3-Slip

    Catalyst

    Metallic-SCRwithout NH3-Slip

    Catalyst

    Metallic-SCRwithout NH3-Slip

    CatalystDEF incr. 20%

    Metallic-SCRwith NH3-Slip

    CatalystDEF increased 20%

    Comparison of Ceramic and Metallic Systems : NH3 Slip in ETC7. FAD-Konferenz , November 2009

  • Agenda

    Exhaust Emission Legislation & Strategies SCR System Layout & Development Requirements of Urea Dosing System Air Assisted / Airless Conclusion

  • High Efficient SCR System Development

    LS

    LS/PE

    LS

    SCR

    S

    L

    I

    P

    EHCHydr. Silencer

    DOC

    LS

    Emicat

    Mixer

    PM Metalit

    SilencerSilencer

  • Vertraulich / ConfidentialCopying of this document and giving it to others is strictly forbidden without express authority of Emitec!

    Airless Urea Injection

    Emitec NoNOx SCR Platforms

    Airless Urea Injection

    Digital Dosing Pump Urea Injection

    Air-Assisted Urea Injection

    Capacity 60 l/hup to 1000 l/h

    Capacity 7,5 l/h

    Capacity 2 l/hand 8 l/h

    Capacity 2 l/hand 8 l/h

  • Thank You


Recommended