EMPLOYMENT AND QUALITY OF LIFE IN THE MISSISSIPPI DELTA
A Summary Report from the 2003 Delta Rural Poll
Alan W. Barton
September, 2004
Policy Paper No. 04-02 Center for Community and Economic Development
ii
Barton, Alan W. Employment and Quality of Life in the Mississippi Delta: A Summary Report from the 2003 Delta Rural Poll. Policy Paper No. 04-02, Center for Community and Economic Development. Delta State University, Cleveland, MS. September, 2004. The Delta Rural Poll is administered by the faculty associates at the Center for Community and Economic Development (CCED) at Delta State University (DSU), with assistance from the DSU Division of Social Sciences. The survey was conducted by the Social Science Research Center at Mississippi State University under the supervision of Dr. Wolfgang Frese. The CCED faculty associates acknowledge and thank the Mid-South Delta Consortium for providing funding for the Delta Rural Poll. Reports produced by the Center for Community and Economic Development have been peer reviewed by colleagues at Delta State University. Any questions, suggestions, or concerns should be sent directly to the author. All of the Center’s research reports detailing the Delta Rural Poll results are posted on the Center’s World Wide Web page at http://www.deltastate.edu/cced/ruralpoll.htm.
iii
Contents
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Who Responded to the Delta Rural Poll . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Employment in the Delta . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Quality of Life Indicators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1 2 2 8
12
List of Figures
Figure 1: Employment Status in 2002 for Respondent and/or Spouse . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Figure 2: Employment Status in 2002 for Respondent and/or Spouse, by Race. . . . . . . . . . . . Figure 3: Ownership of Businesses/Farms in the Delta, by Race . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Figure 4: 2002 Total Household Income, by Race . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Figure 5: Effect of Education on Employment Status . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Figure 6: Effect of Education on Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Figure 7: Effect of Race on Educational Attainment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Figure 8: Quality of Life Assessment Compared to Five Years Ago, to Parents
at the Same Age, and Expected Status Ten Years from Now . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Figure 9: Quality of Life Assessment vis a vis Five Years Ago, by Race. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Figure 10: Quality of Life Assessment, by Race . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Figure 11: Quality of Life Assessment Today vis a vis Five Years Ago, by
Employment Status and Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Figure 12: Change in Community over the Past Year, by Race . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Figure 13: Change in Community over the Past Year, by Size of Place of Residence . . . . . . .
3 3 4 5 6 7 7
8 9 9
10 11 12
List of Tables
Table 1: Occupational Category for Delta Residents, by Race. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Table 2: Employment Status during 2002 of Respondents to the 2003 Delta Rural Poll . . . . . 6 Table 3: Quality of Life Assessment by Place of Residence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
iv
The Mississippi Delta
v
Executive Summary
The Delta region of the state of Mississippi is an area in transition. Known for its agricultural past, the area continues to exhibit characteristics typical of rural America, and agriculture remains an important part of the area’s economy and culture. Yet, employment patterns in the Delta today suggest most residents make a living in administrative and service jobs, much like the rest of America. Data from the 2003 Delta Rural Poll, a survey of 809 residents of 11 northwest Mississippi counties, show that two-thirds of Deltans work full- or part-time, and among those that are employed, over two-thirds work in professional, administrative, sales and service occupations. About one-fourth work in skilled or manual labor positions. Among those that are not employed, two-fifths are retired, just less than one in ten are full-time homemakers, and about 18% are unemployed, three-fourths of whom are not looking for work. Employment conditions in the Delta show great disparities by race. While 72% of white Deltans are employed, only 65% of black residents have a job. Moreover, over 25% of whites own a business or farm, while less than 5% of blacks are entrepreneurs. Whites have higher rates of employment than blacks in professional, technical, administrative and sales positions, while blacks have higher rates in skilled and manual labor. Finally, about one-third of whites earn annual incomes higher than $60,000, about one-third earn incomes between $30,000 and $60,000 and about one-third have incomes below $30,000. Among black Deltans, four in five have an annual income below $30,000, while less than 5% have an income above $60,000. Interestingly, despite disadvantages in employment, a higher proportion of blacks than whites tended to believe the quality of their lives was improving. While most respondents indicated an improvement in the quality of their lives, there were differences if the data are broken down into different time frames. About 80% of all respondents (84% of blacks, 76% of whites) indicated they were better off today than their parents were at the same age. By contrast, only 57% of all respondents (60% of blacks, 51% of whites) believed they were better off today than five years ago. Almost 20% of both races said they were worse off than five years ago. And 37% of all respondents (34% of blacks, 42% of whites) said their community was worse off today than one year ago. Only 21% of respondents believed their community was better off than one year ago. Blacks believed their community was better off at twice the rate of whites (25.5% of blacks, 12.8% of whites). Finally, most Deltans remain optimistic about the future. Over three-fourths expect the quality of their lives to improve in the next ten years, including 84% of black respondents and 65% of white Deltans.
1
EMPLOYMENT AND QUALITY OF LIFE
IN THE MISSISSIPPI DELTA:
A Summary Report from the 2003 Delta Rural Poll
Alan W. Barton, Ph.D.
Introduction Many rural dwellers in the United States are finding life increasingly stressful. The bucolic
image of small-town America is, for many who live in small towns, quickly being erased and
replaced by a mixture of influences more reminiscent of suburban (large chain retailers, strip
malls, housing tracts) and urban (crime and narcotics, failing schools, traffic) America.
Agricultural industrialization and land consolidation have taken away individual livelihoods for
many rural families, leaving service sector wage employment or low-skill industrial work as the
only alternatives for many people. And in some regions, even these jobs are becoming
increasingly scarce.
The changing nature of the work force directly affects people’s perceptions about the quality of
their lives. As jobs are downgraded, people must find additional work to support their families,
leaving them less free time, more stressed, and likely facing a range of social problems. People’s
health care options, already constrained in rural areas, are reduced if they lose health insurance
coverage along with their job. Many people have chosen to leave rural areas to seek
opportunities elsewhere. Out-migration is particularly high in the Midwest and the Lower
Mississippi Valley, including the Delta region of Mississippi. This feeds a vicious cycle in
which depopulation makes rural areas less attractive to employers, so fewer locate in these
regions and more leave to take advantage of more abundant and cheaper labor overseas.
Given this backdrop of changing conditions in rural America, as well as the history of persistent
poverty in the Mississippi Delta region, we asked residents of 11 Delta counties to assess their
quality of life and employment situation as part of the 2003 Delta Rural Poll. This policy report
summarizes and analyzes their responses.
2
Who Responded to the Delta Rural Poll?
The Delta Rural Poll’s first annual survey was conducted in October and November, 2003. The
survey was administered by telephone to a sample of 809 randomly selected residents of eleven
counties in the Delta region of Mississippi. Respondents were all over 18 years of age, 71% of
respondents were female, 61% were black, and 60% worked full- or part-time during 2002.1
Half of the respondents had a high school diploma or less, while one quarter had a college degree
or higher, and the remainder had some college. Nearly two-thirds earned less than $30,000 total
household income in 2002, 15% had a household income above $60,000, and 21.5% had a
household income between $30,000 and $60,000.
One-quarter of the respondents lived in the North Delta (Tunica, Coahoma, Quitman and
Tallahatchie counties), two-thirds lived in the Mid-Delta region (Bolivar, Sunflower, Leflore and
Washington counties), and only 7.5% lived in the South Delta (Humphreys, Sharkey and
Issaquena counties). Thirty-eight percent lived in larger towns (more than 10,000 residents),
28% lived in small villages (less than 1,000 residents), and 34% lived in towns with between
1,000 and 10,000 residents. Two-thirds lived within city limits, 11% lived outside a city on a
farm, and 21.5% lived outside a city, not on a farm. Sixty percent had lived in the same
community for more than twenty years, while 12.6% lived in their current community less than
five years. See Barton (2004) for a more thorough analysis of the sample.
Employment in the Delta
Employment is an important factor that contributes to quality of life. Of course, an income is
essential, and benefits such as health insurance and retirement bring greater security, but among
the other amenities that a job provides are a purpose, a place to go, interaction with colleagues,
and opportunities for learning. For many people, their job forms an important part of their
identity; this speaks to the meaningful role that work plays in people’s lives. I begin with an
analysis of the employment situation in the Delta, as reported by Delta Rural Poll respondents,
before assessing their perceptions about the quality of their lives.
1 It is common for females and whites to be overrepresented in a sample of this nature. To account for this, we applied a weighting procedure, which aligns sample characteristics with data from the 2000 U.S. Census, for analytical purposes. The data reported in this paragraph are unweighted; however, the Employment and Quality of Life sections apply the weighting procedure. See Barton (2004) for a description of the weighting procedure.
3
Many Delta residents express the perception
that jobs are scarce in the region,
particularly as businesses shut down and
move overseas. Nevertheless, as shown in
Figure 1, two-thirds of respondents said that
they and/or their spouse were employed full-
time, part-time or seasonally during 2002.
While this general rate of employment is
reasonable, this statistic does not address
distributional issues, such as: What are the
characteristics of those who have a job
Not Employed
32.4%
Employed67.6%
Weighted Data; N = 801, Missing = 0
Source: 2003 Delta Rural Poll
Figure 1: Employment Status in 2002 for Respondent and/or Spouse
versus those who do not? and Who has the better jobs?
Race and Employment Race is an important characteristic that exerts a strong influence on
conditions in the Delta. Employment status by race is shown in Figure 2. Sixty-five percent of
Black respondents reported that they and/or their spouses were employed during 2002, while
seventy-two percent of white respondents reported the same thing. These figures are comparable
to national employment figures; according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics (2003), the
employment-population ratio in December 2002 for males age 20 and over was 72.3% for whites
and 63.6% for blacks. The difference, however, is that African-Americans are the majority race
in the Delta, comprising over 60% of the population in all eleven counties in the survey, while
blacks make up about 13% of the population
nationwide (U.S. Census Bureau, 2000). As
a result, the lower rate of employment for
blacks translates to a higher overall rate of
Deltans without jobs.
Entrepreneurship Among all respondents
that were employed, about 12% owned a
business or farm in the Delta. Among
business and farm owners, there is a
substantial difference by race. About
64.9
72.0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Black
White
Race
Percent Employed
Weighted Data; N = 795, Missing = 6 Source: 2003 Delta Rural Poll
Figure 2: Employment Status in 2002 for Respondent and/or Spouse, by Race
4
Black
96.4%
3.6%
Owns aBusiness/Farm
Does Not Own aBusiness/Farm
White
25.9%
74.1%
Weighted Data; N = 493, Missing = 4, Not Employed = 304 Source: 2003 Delta Rural Poll
Figure 3: Ownership of Businesses/Farms in the Delta, By Race one-quarter of white respondents owned a business or farm in the Delta, while less than five
percent of black respondents were business or farm owners (see Figure 3).
Occupations What do people do in the Delta? Due to the region’s history and rural character,
many associate the Delta with agriculture, and a drive through the region today confirms that
much of the land is still used for farming. Yet, only 6.5% of respondents reported working in
farming. While this is higher than the national average, it is probably lower than most people
would expect and an indicator of the changing nature of employment in the Delta region.
Table 1 shows the occupations reported by respondents to the Delta Rural Poll. As with the rest
of the U.S., many people in the Delta are employed today in administrative and service-sector
occupations. Nearly two-fifths of respondents work in professional and administrative positions,
while an additional 30% work in administrative support, sales, and service jobs.
Close to half of the white respondents reported holding a professional, technical or
administrative position, compared to one-third of black respondents. Overall, nearly 70% of
white respondents held professional, administrative (including administrative support) or sales
jobs, while about half of black respondents reported jobs in these categories. By contrast, nearly
one-third of employed black respondents worked as skilled or manual laborers, compared to
about 15% of white respondents.
5
Table 1: Occupational Category for Delta Residents, by Race (Percent of Employed Respondents)
Race (N = 489) Occupation
All Respondents
(N = 492) White Black
Professional/Technical/Administrative 38.8 47.8 33.1
Administrative Support 7.7 9.2 6.9
Sales 9.9 11.4 9.2
Service 11.9 8.2 14.1
Skilled Labor 12.8 10.9 13.4
Manual Labor 12.5 3.3 18.4
Farming 6.5 9.2 4.9 Weighted Data
Source: 2003 Delta Rural Poll
The disparity in employment status, entrepreneurship and occupation in part accounts for the
substantial differences between whites and blacks in income; as shown in Figure 4. Slightly
more than one-third of white Delta households have incomes over $60,000 and slightly less than
one-third fall into the middle- and low-income categories, while four-fifths of black Delta
households have incomes below $30,000 per year, and less than five percent have incomes above
$60,000 per year.
Unemployment Among those that were not employed in 2002, two-fifths were retired, nearly
one-quarter were disabled, about one in ten were full-time homemakers, and about seven percent
79.6
15.5
32.8
35.3
32.0
4.9
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
Black White
Race
More Than$60,000
Between $30,000and $60,000
Less Than$30,000
Household Income Before Taxes
(2002)
Weighted Data; N = 673, Missing = 128 Source: 2003 Delta Rural Poll
Figure 4: 2002 Total Household Income, by Race
6
Table 2: Employment Status during 2002 of Respondents to the 2003 Delta Rural Poll
Employment Status Employed (n = 497)
Percent of Employed
Employed, Does Not Own a Farm or Business 88.1 Owns a Farm or Business in the Delta (n = 59) 11.9
Percent of Owns a Farm or
Business Owns a Farm 3.6 30.5 Owns a Business 6.8 57.6 Owns Both a Farm and a Business 1.5 11.9
Not Employed (n = 304)
Percent of Not
Employed Retired 41.5 Disabled 22.7 Full-time Homemaker 9.3 Student 7.4 Unemployed (n = 53) 17.6
Percent of Unemployed
Unemployed, Looking for Work 4.0 22.8 Unemployed, Not Looking for Work 12.2 77.2
Weighted Data, N = 801 Source: 2003 Delta Rural Poll
were students (Table 2). The rest (17.6%) were unemployed. Over three-fourths of the
unemployed were not looking for work in 2002.
While the employment rate in the
Delta on the whole is good, the data
presented here suggest that black
Delta residents lack the same
employment opportunities as whites,
reflected in the low rates of business
ownership, lower employment rates,
higher rates of employment as
laborers and lower rates in
professional positions, and
substantially lower total household
income among black families.
55.2
80.7 82.2 79.4
44.8
19.3 17.8 20.6
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
H.S.Diploma or
Less
SomeCollege
Bachelor'sDegree
Grad/ProfDegree
Highest Level of Education
Not Employed
Employed
Employment Status
Weighted Data; N = 798, Missing = 3
Source: 2003 Delta Rural Poll
Figure 5: Effect of Education on Employment Status
7
Education and Employment Many
Delta residents believe that education
is the key to a better job and a better
life. Data from the Delta Rural Poll
support this notion. As shown in
Figure 5, those with some college are
more likely to have a job than those
with only a high school diploma or
less. In addition, Figure 6 indicates
that more years of education
translate into higher earnings.
Among those with a high school
diploma or less, over four-fifths earn
81.1
59.3
28.8 22.9
14.1
21.4
42.3
29.2
19.228.8
47.9
4.8
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
H.S.Diploma or
Less
SomeCollege
Bachelor'sDegree
Grad/ProfDegree
Highest Level of Education
More Than$60,000
Between $30,000and $60,000
Less Than$30,000
2002 Household Income Before Taxes
Weighted Data; N = 674, Missing = 127
Source: 2003 Delta Rural Poll
Figure 6: Effect of Education on Income
less than $30,000 annually, while less than five percent earn more than $60,000. One’s chance
of earning more increases with education, and among those with graduate or professional
degrees, nearly half earn more than $60,000 per year, while less than one-quarter earn less than
$30,000 annually. Among college graduates, over 70% make more than $30,000 per year.
The data shown in Figure 7 suggest that education’s benefits are not evenly distributed, however.
A substantially lower percentage of black respondents had completed college or graduate/
professional school than white
respondents, and a much higher
percentage of black respondents than
white respondents reported their highest
educational level as a high school
degree or less. Perhaps education is a
ticket to employment and a higher
income, but whites in the Delta continue
to have more access to this opportunity
than African Americans.
60.2
24.9
10.8
4.2
34.7
26.1
25.4
13.7
0 20 40 60 80 100
H.S. Diploma orLess
Some College
Bachelor'sDegree
Grad/Prof Degree
Hig
hes
t Lev
el o
f Ed
uca
tion
Percent
White
Black
Race
Weighted Data; N = 793, Missing = 8
Source: 2003 Delta Rural Poll
Figure 7: Effect of Race on Educational Attainment
8
Quality of Life Indicators
Given the employment situation in the Delta, how do residents perceive their quality of life? Of
course, employment is not the only factor that affects quality of life; some Deltans might
consider involvement in community groups and activities, a happy marriage and stable family,
good health, or status in the community to be equally or more important. Nevertheless, one’s job
is an important factor that affects one’s ability to lead a happy life.
In the big picture, Deltans believe the quality of their lives is improving, and they are optimistic
that things will continue to improve in the future (Figure 8). Nearly four out of five respondents
believe they are better off than their parents were at the same age, and almost the same
proportion expect to be better off in ten years time. In the short run, however, about one in five
respondents have experienced a recent decline in the quality of their lives, and only 57% believe
they are better off today than five years ago. One quarter believe they lives have stayed about
the same in the past five years.
Race and Quality of Life Given the inequities noted in employment, are African Americans
more likely to report lower quality of life? Figure 9 shows that equal proportions of blacks and
whites report a decline in their quality of life in the past five years; however, only about half of
the white respondents thought they were better off today than five years ago, while 60% of black
respondents rated their life better today than five years ago.
WorseOff
About The Same
BetterOff
18.7%
24.6%56.6%
N = 790, Missing = 11
Weighted Data Source: 2003 Delta Rural Poll
Status Today vis a vis Five Years Ago
About The Same
Worse Off
BetterOff
79.1%
10.6%
7.9%
N = 801, Missing = 0
Status Today vis a vis Parents at the Same Age
Better Off
About The Same
Worse Off
6.7%
16.3%
77.1%
N = 690, Missing = 111
Expected Status Ten Years from Now
Figure 8: Quality of Life Assessment Compared to Five Years Ago, to Parents at the Same Age, and Expected Status Ten Years from Now
9
19.3 18.2
20.731.3
50.560.0
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Black WhiteRace
Better Off
About the Same
Worse Off
Status vis a vis5 Years Ago
Weighted Data; N = 784, Missing = 17 Source: 2003 Delta Rural Poll
Figure 9: Quality of Life Assessment vis a vis Five Years Ago, by Race Likewise, blacks were more likely than whites to perceive their quality of life today as better
than their parents, although the vast majority in both groups believed things have improved.
Slightly more than three-fourths of white respondents perceived themselves to be better off than
their parents were at the same age, while 84% of blacks held this same opinion. Looking to the
future, black Deltans showed substantially more optimism. As shown in Figure 10, about 85%
of black respondents indicated they expected their quality of life to improve over the next ten
years, while only 65% of whites believed their lives would improve. One quarter of white
respondents said they expected their quality of life to remain the same in the next ten years,
while only 10% of black respondents expected things to remain the same.
7.4 9.38.6
14.5
76.284.0
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
Black White
Race
N = 777, Missing = 24 Weighted Data Source: 2003 Delta Rural Poll
Status vis a vis Parents at Same Age
5.6 8.110.1
26.7
84.265.1
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
Black White
Race
Better Off
About the Same
Worse Off
Status
N = 683, Missing = 118
Expected Status Ten Years from Now
Figure 10: Quality of Life Assessment, by Race
10
Employment, Income and Quality of
Life The effects of employment and
income on quality of life are shown
in Figure 11. As would be expected,
those with a job are much more
likely to indicate an improvement in
their quality of life over the past five
years, as are those with incomes over
$30,000 per year. Sixty-three
percent of employed respondents
indicated they were better off today
than five years ago, and an additional
twenty percent said their quality of
life was about the same. Among
those without a job, only 43.5% said
they were better off, and 33.6% said
they were about the same. Nearly
one quarter of those not employed
said they were worse off than five
years ago. Among those earning
16.8 22.9
20.3
33.6
62.9
43.5
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Employed Not Employed
Employment Status N = 790, Missing = 11
23.711.3
25.1
21.7
51.2
15.0
19.0
67.066.0
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Less Than$30,000
Between$30,000 and
$60,000
More Than$60,000
Income
Better Off
About The Same
Worse Off
N = 667, Missing = 134 Weighted Data
Source: 2003 Delta Rural Poll Figure 11: Quality of Life Assessment
Today vis a vis Five Years Ago, by Employment Status and Income
over $30,000 per year, two-thirds indicated the quality of their lives had improved over the past
five years. About half of those with incomes under $30,000 felt their lives were better today
than five years ago. About one quarter of those with incomes below $30,000 said their life was
about the same and about one quarter said they were worse off than five years ago.
Community Characteristics and Quality of Life Table 3 summarizes opinions on quality of life
by place of residence (See also Appendix A). Comparing quality of life today versus five years
ago, opinions did not vary at all between residents of the North, Central and South Delta. There
was some variation in response to the question comparing quality of life today with the
respondents’ parents at the same age; residents in South Delta counties were more likely to
indicate an improvement, although more than three-fourths of the residents in all regions said
Status vis a vis 5 Years Ago
11
Table 3: Quality of Life Assessment by Place of Residence (Percent)
Status vis a vis: Parents at Same Age 5 Years Ago 10 Years from Now
County
Bet
ter
Off
Abo
ut
the
Sam
e
Wor
se
Off
Bet
ter
Off
Abo
ut
the
Sam
e
Wor
se
Off
Bet
ter
Off
Abo
ut
the
Sam
e
Wor
se
Off
North Delta 78.5 12.4 9.1 56.7 25.3 18.0 79.9 14.8 5.3
Mid-Delta 81.0 11.0 8.0 56.5 24.4 19.0 75.1 17.5 7.5
South Delta 88.1 5.1 6.8 56.7 25.0 18.3 85.2 9.3 5.6
Total 80.9 10.9 8.2 56.6 24.7 18.7 77.0 16.2 6.8
N = 782, Missing = 19 N = 790, Missing = 11 N = 692, Missing = 109
Weighted Data Source: 2003 Delta Rural Poll
their lives were better than their parents. Residents of the South Delta were also the most
optimistic that their lives would be better off in ten years time, but again over three-fourths
expressed this belief in all regions.
In addition to individual quality of life, respondents were asked whether their communities had
improved in the past year. Results are summarized in Figure 12. Among all respondents, about
one-fifth believed their community had improved over the past year, while nearly two-fifths
34.2
40.3
25.5
45.1
12.8
37.1
42.1
20.8
42.0
0 10 20 30 40 50
Worse
About theSame
Better
Cha
nge
in C
omm
unity
Ove
r P
ast Y
ear
Percent
All Respondents
White
Black
Race
Weighted Data; N = 779, Missing = 22 Source: 2003 Delta Rural Poll
Figure 12: Change in Community Over Past Year, by Race
12
thought their community was worse than a year ago, and just over two-fifths indicated their
community was about the same as a year ago. African Americans had a more positive opinion of
changes in their community than whites. One quarter of black respondents believed their
community had improved over the past year, twice the rate of white respondents. By contrast,
42.0 percent of white respondents believed their community was worse off than a year ago,
compared to 34.2% of black respondents.
The size of a community also affected how residents perceived changes in their community over
the past year. As shown in Figure 13, residents of smaller communities, less than 1,000
residents, were more likely to believe their community had improved over the past year. Nearly
30% of those in small communities indicated an improvement, while less than 15% of those in
larger towns, over 10,000 residents, said their community was better off than one year ago.
Those living in medium-sized places, between 1,000 and 10,000 residents, fell in the middle –
21% indicated an improvement. Nearly half of the residents of towns over 10,000 believed their
community was worse off compared to a year ago, while only 27.4% of those in villages smaller
than 1,000 said their community was worse off.
Conclusion
The employment and quality of life data presented above present a paradox. Comparing black
and white respondents, on the whole whites have a higher rate of employment, they earn
substantially more income, they are employed in professional and administrative jobs at a higher
27.438.5
47.5
43.2
40.537.7
29.514.821.0
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Less Than1,000
Between 1,000and 10,000
More Than10,000
Size of Place of Residence
Better
About the Same
Worse
Change in Community Over Past Year
Weighted Data; N = 569, Missing = 232 Source: 2003 Delta Rural Poll
Figure 13: Change in Community Over Past Year, by Size of Place of Residence
13
rate and skilled and manual labor jobs at a lower rate, and they own businesses and farms at a
much higher rate. Nevertheless, whites rate their quality of life lower than black respondents,
when compared to their parents, when compared to five years ago, and their expectations for the
next ten years are lower as well. It should be pointed out that a similar percentage of black and
white respondents rated their quality of life as “worse off” – almost one in five when compared
to five years ago, and less than one in ten when compared to their parents or when looking ahead
ten years. White respondents rated their quality of life “about the same” at a higher rate than
black respondents.
One possible explanation ties demographic factors to the issue of quality of life. With the
exception of Tunica County, all of the counties in this study have been losing population for
many years. It would make sense to assume that some or many of those that leave do so because
their quality of life is low; hence, quality of life statistics for those that stayed in the Delta would
be inflated. An upcoming report from the Center for Community and Economic Development
will explore emigration from the Delta based on results from the 2003 Delta Rural Poll, and may
shed light on these dynamics.
A second potential explanation connects current employment and quality of life to historic
patterns in the region. It may be that black Deltans continue to be disadvantaged in employment,
yet they are better off than in the past. Likewise, while whites hold advantages in the job market,
they may believe that things have not improved recently. The fact that only one in eight white
respondents believed their community had improved over the past year, while 42% said things
had gotten worse, suggests that many whites perceive conditions are changing for the worse, and
this affects their individual quality of life. Among black respondents, one in four saw their
community improving, while only 34% believed their community was worse off than one year
ago, and this is translated into a greater sense that their quality of life is improving, and greater
optimism about the future.
The results from the 2003 Delta Rural Poll are intriguing. Delta State University researchers will
investigate employment issues in greater detail in the next Delta Rural Poll, scheduled for
February, 2005. The 2005 poll will likely include qualitative interviews on employment, which
will help us develop explanations for the changing job conditions highlighted in this survey.
14
Appendix A: Quality of Life Assessment by County of Residence Status
vis a vis: Parents at Same Age 5 Years Ago 10 Years from Now
County
Bet
ter
Off
Abo
ut
the
Sam
e
Wor
se
Off
Bet
ter
Off
Abo
ut
the
Sam
e
Wor
se
Off
Bet
ter
Off
Abo
ut
the
Sam
e
Wor
se
Off
Bolivar 84.9 13.5 1.6 57.6 27.2 15.2 78.6 17.5 3.9
Coahoma 86.0 7.0 7.0 55.6 20.0 24.4 82.1 14.1 3.8
Humphreys 93.9 3.0 3.0 66.7 9.1 24.2 93.3 6.7 0.0
Issaquena 100.0 0.0 0.0 57.1 14.3 28.6 83.3 16.7 0.0
Leflore 85.2 7.8 7.0 62.4 20.5 17.1 72.0 20.0 8.0
Quitman 73.3 16.7 10.0 60.0 33.3 6.7 73.1 23.1 3.8
Sharkey 80.0 10.0 10.0 42.1 52.6 5.3 75.0 12.5 12.5
Sunflower 76.1 15.6 8.3 56.6 21.7 21.7 69.7 17.2 13.1
Tallahatchie 75.0 13.6 11.4 50.0 30.4 19.6 78.4 13.5 8.1
Tunica 68.0 20.0 12.0 67.9 21.4 10.7 82.1 10.7 7.1
Washington 79.0 8.6 12.4 52.1 26.6 21.3 78.2 15.8 6.1
Total 81.3 10.8 7.9 56.7 24.5 18.9 77.2 16.1 6.7
Weighted Data; N = 780, Missing = 20
Weighted Data; N = 789, Missing = 12
Weighted Data; N = 688, Missing = 113
Weighted Data Source: 2003 Delta Rural Poll
15
References
Barton, Alan W. The 2003 Delta Rural Poll: History, Methods and Characteristics of the Sample. Research Paper No. 04-01, Center for Community and Economic Development. Delta State University, Cleveland, MS. August, 2004. Available at http://www.deltastate.edu/cced/ruralpoll.htm. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2003. News: The Employment Situation, December 2002. USDL 03-05, United States Department of Labor, Washington, DC. Retrieved September 28, 2004 from http://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/empsit_01102003.pdf. U.S. Census Bureau. 2000. Profile of General Demographic Characteristics. Retrieved September 12, 2004 from http://factfinder.census.gov.
16
Policy Papers from the
Center for Community and Economic Development Policy Paper 04-01 Green, John J. Access to Health Care in the Mississippi Delta: A Summary Report from the 2003 Delta Rural Poll. Policy Paper No. 04-01, Center for Community and Economic Development. Delta State University, Cleveland, MS. August, 2004. Policy Paper 04-02 Barton, Alan W. Employment and Quality of Life in the Mississippi Delta: A Summary Report from the 2003 Delta Rural Poll. Policy Paper No. 04-02, Center for Community and Economic Development. Delta State University, Cleveland, MS. September, 2004. Alan W. Barton is Assistant Professor of Sociology and Community Development in the Division of Social Sciences and Faculty Associate in the Center for Community and Economic Development at Delta State University. He has a Ph.D. is Development Sociology from Cornell University, an M.S. in Forest Management from the University of Washington, and a B.A. in Sociology and Spanish from the University of California, Berkeley. The author thanks Dr. John J. Green for his helpful comments on a previous draft of this report. Contact Information Alan W. Barton Division of Social Sciences 205 Kethley Hall Delta State University Cleveland, MS 38733 (662) 846-4065