Date post: | 04-Apr-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | jay-patrick-silva-jamero |
View: | 277 times |
Download: | 1 times |
of 47
7/30/2019 Empowerment Indicators
1/47
EMPOWERMENT INDICATORS OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES
A Research PaperPresented to
The English Department of Saint Louis University Laboratory High School
Baguio City
In Partial Fulfillment
Of the Requirements inEnglish 4
ByPatrick Edward L. Balisong
IV- Mapagpakumbaba
7/30/2019 Empowerment Indicators
2/47
Patrick Edward Laureta Balisong/ Empowerment of Indigenous Peoples | ii
English 4
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
To the Lord God, by whose intervention I am alive and able to wake up
and work; He who has allowed me to seize the day. The mighty presence who
gives me strength of mind, body and spirit and who provides my needs; it is by
His glory that this paper was made and so all praises are lifted to His loving
name.
To my grandparents, parents, siblings and to the rest of my family for
whom I am doing this paper for. To my grandparents and parents who gave me
my existence and who continually provide for me and support me in all my
endeavors. To my siblings, thank you for understanding me whenever I get fuzzy
and rude, I was stressed. I love you all.
To my classmates and friends who made me laugh whenever I felt down.
They who helped me in the most challenging moments and who I also shared my
triumphs with; they who accompanied me to the places I went and helped me get
through without asking anything in return.
To my research adviser, Mrs. Karen Joy Arellano- Viernes, who was
always kind and patient and entertained all my questions and helped me improve
my study. She who never got annoyed whenever I asked the same question
twice or thrice and a million other more times. To Mr. Elizer Jay de los Reyes, for
being a mentor and friend and consultant, thanks for being Darna whenever and
wherever.
To all of you who have made this research possible, thank you!
To God be the glory!
7/30/2019 Empowerment Indicators
3/47
Patrick Edward Laureta Balisong/ Empowerment of Indigenous Peoples | iii
English 4
DEDICATION
To Lolo Doming, thank you for watching me from above
7/30/2019 Empowerment Indicators
4/47
Patrick Edward Laureta Balisong/ Empowerment of Indigenous Peoples | iv
English 4
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title Page i
Acknowledgement ii
Dedication iii
Table of Contents iv
Abstract v
Chapter 1: The Problem 1
Background of the Study 1
Paradigm of the Study 10
Statement of the Problem 11
Chapter 2: Methods and Procedures 12
Research Design 12
Population and Locale of the Study 12
Data Gathering Tool 15
Data Gathering Procedure 15
Statistical Treatment 16
Chapter 3: Results and Discussions 18
Internal Indicators 18
External Indicators 21
School Environment 23
Chapter 4: Conclusions and Recommendations 26
Refereed Materials 29
Appendices 33
A. The Questionnaire 34
B. Tables 36
7/30/2019 Empowerment Indicators
5/47
Patrick Edward Laureta Balisong/ Empowerment of Indigenous Peoples | v
English 4
ABSTRACT
Since time in memorial stigma against people who are members of
indigenous cultures and their descendants has been in existence; what is
alarming, however, is that amidst growing neoliberal thinking and philosophy, no
significant change happens; efforts to change mainstream societys notions, both
from inside and outside the groups, have not yielded sufficiently to be branded as
successful.
This paper looked into the frequency of feeling empowerment indicators
by first to fourth year students of Saint Louis University Laboratory High School
for the school year 2011- 2012. Specifically, it aimed to answer the following
questions: (1) How often are internal indicators of empowerment felt?, (2) How
often are external indicators of empowerment felt? and (3) What is the
assessment of the schools social environment relative to the empowerment of
indigenous peoples?
The descriptive research was used in the study. It had involved 243
students from the total population of 1,542. A questionnaire based on the
standard empowerment indicator index was used to gather necessary data. The
pieces of information were statistically treated using the percentage.
It was found that internal indicators of empowerment are only felt
sometimes by students. Students sometimes identify their indigenous roots and
participate in traditional activities and practices, while they rarely speak in their
native dialects.
7/30/2019 Empowerment Indicators
6/47
Patrick Edward Laureta Balisong/ Empowerment of Indigenous Peoples | vi
English 4
It was also found that external indicators of empowerment are only felt
sometimes. Traditional practices during programs and in lessons are only seen
sometimes.
Moreover, the students fairly agree that the schools social environment is
uplifting the status of indigenous peoples. They say that student elections and
peer grouping are fairly affected by indigenous roots and membership.
7/30/2019 Empowerment Indicators
7/47
Patrick Edward Laureta Balisong/ Empowerment of Indigenous Peoples | vii
English 4
7/30/2019 Empowerment Indicators
8/47
Patrick Edward Laureta Balisong/ Empowerment of Indigenous Peoples | 1
English4
CHAPTER 1
THE PROBLEM
Background of the Study
Since the onset of colonialism and the modern nation-state, indigenous
peoples have always been among the most vulnerable and exploited in the
world. In the Philippines, the integrity of indigenous communities has historically
been subjected to enormous pressure from the Spanish, American and Japanese
occupants, the government, the Philippine society and local and multi-national
corporations (Onaga & Manuel, 2004).
According to the Asian Development Bank, indigenous peoples should be
regarded as those with social or cultural identity distinct from the dominant or
mainstream society, which makes them vulnerable to being disadvantaged in the
process of development (http://ethnicfilipinos.ph/filer/toledo-cebu/chapter_2.pdf,
2000). Furthermore, in the 1997 ratification of the Indigenous Peoples Rights
Act, it uses the following working definition of indigenous peoples.
A group of people or homogenous societies identified by self- ascription
and ascription by others, who have continuously lived as organized community
on communally bounded and defined territory...sharing common bonds of
language, customs, traditions and other distinctive cultural traits, or who
have...become historically differentiated from majority of Filipinos. Indigenous
cultural communities shall likewise include peoples who are regarded as
indigenous on account of their descent from the populations which inhabited the
country, at the time of conquest or at the time of inroads of non- indigenous
http://ethnicfilipinos.ph/filer/toledo-cebu/chapter_2.pdfhttp://ethnicfilipinos.ph/filer/toledo-cebu/chapter_2.pdf7/30/2019 Empowerment Indicators
9/47
Patrick Edward Laureta Balisong/ Empowerment of Indigenous Peoples | 2
English4
religions and cultures, or the establishment of present state boundaries, who
retain some or all of their economic, cultural and political institutions, but who
may have resettled outside their ancestral domains (IPRA, Chapter II, Section 2).
There are one hundred twelve ethno linguistic groups in the country who,
as of 2005, comprise nearly fifteen percent of the total population of the country.
Majority of the indigenous populations reside in the uplands. They are among the
poorest and most disadvantaged social group in the country. Illiteracy,
unemployment and incidence of poverty are much higher among them.
Indigenous settlements are characterized by a high incidence of morbidity,
mortality and malnutrition (De Vera, 2007). In the recent years, the country has
witnessed the influx of these peoples into urban areas, or in most cases, it has
witnessed the penetration of mainstream civilization into indigenous lands. The
immigration of these peoples is widely attributed to the communities answers to
broader educational opportunities and other opportunities, thereafter. While the
vast majority of indigenous groups in the Philippines have adopted modern
lifestyles, some small indigenous groups chose to maintain their traditional way
of life.
Culture is considered to be a design for living, a set of potential guides or
a frame of references by which the contingent event is interpreted, it is the fabric
of meaning, a logical- meaningful integration (Goda, 2001); something that
Indigenous peoples do not fall short of. It is the attachment to these cultures and
traditions of indigenous peoples that formed the foundation of stereotypes from
the majority. The practice and use of traditional ways such as the practice of
7/30/2019 Empowerment Indicators
10/47
Patrick Edward Laureta Balisong/ Empowerment of Indigenous Peoples | 3
English4
traditional medicine have made many look at indigenous communities as
primitive and uncivilized (Bellom, 1972).
It is incredible to contemplate that the indigenous ethno linguistic
inhabitants of the northern Luzon highlands received so much attention from the
two most powerful and longest- lasting colonizers of the country- Spain and the
United States. These colonizers were driven to effect drastic changes in the lives
of the mountain peoples, specifically aiming at their incorporation into the
national society. The Igorots, like many other indigenous groups in the Philippine
archipelago, remain culturally distinct from the rest of the Philippine society. They
face a negative image problem that operated to be squarely and solidly anchored
in the stereotype that they are ignorant, undisciplined and uncouth dirty savages
who even have tails. They are generally considered among the mainstream
population to be, not only different but also inferior. A negative image and
ambivalent attitude towards these communities are widespread among
lowlanders generally but not individually (Costina & Difuntorum, 2001).
Racial discrimination is alien to the prevailing mores and culture of Filipino
people and that there has never been any reference to the existence of a
discriminatory policy on racial grounds, nor has there been any allegation of
instances of discrimination as a specific kind of human rights violation in the
Philippines, even before or immediately after the Philippines has adopted and
ratified the Convention on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination. Racial
discrimination has never existed among ancient Filipinos who belong to a single
racial stock, the Malays. It was in fact the ideological, cultural and socio-
7/30/2019 Empowerment Indicators
11/47
Patrick Edward Laureta Balisong/ Empowerment of Indigenous Peoples | 4
English4
economic legacy of a long history of colonialism that brought about the present
differences in the levels of development between the majority of Filipinos and
those among them who tenaciously cleaved to the indigenous Filipino cultural
heritage (UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, 2009).
Millennia of living and interacting among the various ethno-linguistic groups and
cultural influences from abroad have forged a tolerant and democratically-
oriented Philippine society. Discrimination against indigenous peoples by the
Philippine society includes general disrespect, discrimination in protection by the
institutions, language discriminations, and insults, among others. Experiencing
ambivalence and scepticism by the majority towards ones indigenous identity, as
well as experiencing the fallout from the negative indigenous image is
discomforting, embarrassing and exhilarating, all at once. Felix M. Keesing
(1962) hypothesized that the separation between the indigenous inhabitants of
the country and the majority of the Philippine populate is a phenomenon of the
Spanish era. Colonialism created a cultural chasm between the majority and the
indigenous communities and set the conditions for the destructive stereotyping
experienced, even today.
It is seen that stereotyping as a cultural matter, a learned set of beliefs
and attitudes. If culture, and by extension, stereotypes are learned, then the
stereotypes can be modified or even unlearned (Costina & Difuntorum, 2001).
This is a worthwhile endeavour given the various ethno linguistic communities
present within the Louisian community that are affected and the desirability of a
strong institutional foundation knitting the elements of the institution together into
7/30/2019 Empowerment Indicators
12/47
Patrick Edward Laureta Balisong/ Empowerment of Indigenous Peoples | 5
English4
a social system in which everyone counts and is appreciated for what he or she
is.
Institutions remain blinded by the tokenistic efforts of the higher powers.
The year 1994 ushered the release of the United Nations Draft Declaration on
the Rights of Indigenous People which gave members of indigenous
communities in every nation civil and political rights as well as economic and
social rights; furthermore, it opened doors for the practice of cultural and
collective rights. In the year 1997, Republic Act 8371 also known as the
Indigenous Peoples Rights Act was passed in to the legislature to aid these
indigenous communities reacquire their lands from capitalists who have infiltrated
their territories during the era of colonization. In the last decade, reinforcing
programmes and projects have been incorporated to further improve the quality
of life of these indigenous peoples. In the Philippines, the United Nations
Development Program (UNDP) provided projects such as: Capacity Building for
Indigenous Peoples Leaders and Community Development, Para-legal
functions and Project Planning and Management. The UNDP also launched the
Integrated Program for the Empowerment of Indigenous Peoples and
Sustainable Development of Ancestral Domains (United Nations Development
Program, 2010). Despite these guarantees, the Indigenous peoples remain
among the poorest, most disadvantaged and least empowered people.
Empowerment is enhancing the individuals of groups capacity to make
choices and transform those choices into desired actions and outcomes.
7/30/2019 Empowerment Indicators
13/47
Patrick Edward Laureta Balisong/ Empowerment of Indigenous Peoples | 6
English4
The problem on empowerment is nuanced therefore to the whole idea of
human development. Indigenous communities, in as much as they continue to be
stereotyped and disrespected through various forms, are further oppressed by
the ideological frameworks that exists in society which caters to the whole idea
that human development is living in accordance to a standard set by the society.
In an article published by an unknown author on human development and
indigenous peoples (2010) it was stated that, contrary to popular belief, human
development is actually a process of expanding peoples real freedoms - their
valuable capabilities- and empowering people as active agents of equitable
development on a shared planet. Furthermore, it goes on saying that human
development for indigenous peoples should be defined by indigenous peoples,
from indigenous peoples, regardless of the mainstream population.
As in the past, indigenous communities in the Philippines continue to face
challenges with courage. They mobilize to fight for justice, equity and cultural
survival through numerous creative strategies.
The researcher got very much interested in his discovery of the
relationships that exists among different factors and their effects in the
empowerment and further development of indigenous peoples at a national level.
It is his interest therefore to apply the same ideological frameworks to determine
the frequency of feeling empowerment indicators within the academe and offer
suggestions in the resuscitation of tradition and heritage.
The study aims to identify the problems met by members of indigenous
peoples groups in terms of being empowered. Specifically it attempts to identify
7/30/2019 Empowerment Indicators
14/47
Patrick Edward Laureta Balisong/ Empowerment of Indigenous Peoples | 7
English4
the frequency of feeling empowerment indicators within Saint Louis University
Laboratory High School; furthermore, it aims to determine the frequency of
feeling internal and external empowerment indicators and finally assess the
degree of empowerment felt by these indigenous peoples.
Theoretical Framework
This section presented the concepts which served as legal basis to
describe properly the process of the study. The research will revolve around a
framework presented by Alsop and Heinsohn (2005).
Agency
Agency is defined as an actors ability to make meaningful choices; that is,
the actor is able to envisage options and make a choice. Asset endowments are
used as indicators of agency. These assets can be psychological, informational,
organizational, material, social, financial or human. Command over one asset
can affect the endowment of another asset. In as much as the research is
concerned, the results will be confined in psychological, social and human assets
as they are the most relevant. Psychological indicators to be used in the study
are: self- determination, availability of education to be measured by determining
the frequency of cultural integration in lessons. Social indicators to be included in
the study are: degree of societal acceptance, peer grouping, choices made
during student elections and environmental perceptions. Human asset indicators
in the study are: the use of the native language in communicating with others,
participation in traditional activities, joining activities which call for indigenous
7/30/2019 Empowerment Indicators
15/47
Patrick Edward Laureta Balisong/ Empowerment of Indigenous Peoples | 8
English4
knowledge and student reaction to such displays of culture (Dandeneau, et. al,
2008).
Opportunity Structure
An actors opportunity structure is shaped by the presence and operation
of formal and informal institutions. These include laws, regulatory frameworks
and norms governing peoples behaviour. The presence and operation of the
formal and informal laws, regulations, norms and customs determine whether
individuals and groups have access to assets, and whether these people can use
the assets to achieve desired outcomes. Opportunity structures that were utilized
during the study are: the presence of available choices of self- actualization and
self- expression of indigenous communities as provided for by the institution and
the use, or the lack of use, of the academe as a catalyst for majority acceptance
of indigenous peoples through activities and the like.
Degrees of Empowerment
Measurement of assets and institutions provides intermediary indicators of
empowerment. Direct measures of empowerment can be made by assessing:
1. Whether an opportunity to make a choice exists. This is commonly the
basis for gauging the social strata where the actors are placed in.
2. Whether a person actually uses the opportunity to choose. A persons
choice to use these opportunities gauges the internal indicators of
empowerment.
3. Whether the choice resulted in the desired result. The impact to the actors
and to society is the measurement of external indicators of empowerment.
7/30/2019 Empowerment Indicators
16/47
Patrick Edward Laureta Balisong/ Empowerment of Indigenous Peoples | 9
English4
The expected outcomes of the study are those that lean towards self-
actualization, community development and institutional change.
7/30/2019 Empowerment Indicators
17/47
Patrick Edward Laureta Balisong/ Empowerment of Indigenous Peoples | 10
English4
Figure 1: Paradigm of the Study
Agency
Opportunity
Structure
Degree of
Empowerment
Survey among
students
Working towards a
better society and
community Solving problems in
the home, work
place and
community
Engaging in
group/institutional
change
Reaching towards
individual higher
goals
Personal stability
and self-
understanding
INPUT PROCESS OUTCOME
7/30/2019 Empowerment Indicators
18/47
Patrick Edward Laureta Balisong/ Empowerment of Indigenous Peoples | 11
English4
Statement of the Problem
The main problem of the study is to determine the frequency of
feeling empowerment indicators by first to fourth year students of Saint Louis
University Laboratory High School who are members of indigenous communities.
Specifically it attempts to answer the following question:
1. How often are internal indicators of empowerment felt?
2. How often are external indicators of empowerment felt?
3. What is the assessment of the schools social environment
relative to the empowerment of indigenous peoples?
7/30/2019 Empowerment Indicators
19/47
Patrick Edward Laureta Balisong/ Empowerment of Indigenous Peoples | 12
English4
CHAPTER 2
METHODS AND PROCEDURES
This chapter presents the methods used in evaluating and interpreting the
data gathered on the empowerment indicators of students who are members of
cultural minorities. Furthermore, it discusses the tools and procedures used in
gathering the data, coining the sample population and the statistical treatment
used in the course of data analysis and interpretation.
Research Design
The descriptive method of research was used in the study. According to
the study of Pambid (2011) as stated in the study of Arellano (2010), this method
describes a given state of affairs as fully and carefully as possible (Fraenkel and
Wallen, 2006). It is a purposive process of gathering, analyzing, classifying and
tabulating data about prevailing conditions, practices, trends and cause-effect
relationships and making adequate and accurate interpretation about such data
with or without the aid of statistical treatment (Calderon and Gonzales, 1993).
The method was used to interpret the results of the normative survey,
which looked into the commonality of some factors through tables with its
appropriate description (Pambid, 2011).
Population and Locale of the Study
The study was conducted in Saint Louis University Laboratory High
School.
The necessary data on the number of students per section was obtained
from the schools Registrars office. The total number of students for the school
7/30/2019 Empowerment Indicators
20/47
Patrick Edward Laureta Balisong/ Empowerment of Indigenous Peoples | 13
English4
year 2011- 2012 is 1542. The researcher took representatives from the different
sections of the different year levels through stratified random sampling. The
researcher had obtained 243 students to participate in his study; 66 from the first
year, 64 from the second year, 60 from the third year and 53 from the fourth year.
The researcher had determined the actual sample size using the Pagoso
formula, also known as Slovin formula. The researcher had allotted a 5% margin
of error to save both time and resources. The formula is: n= ____N____
1 + Ne
Where: n= sampling size
N= population size
e= margin of error
The table below presents the division of students involved in the study per
year level per section.
7/30/2019 Empowerment Indicators
21/47
Patrick Edward Laureta Balisong/ Empowerment of Indigenous Peoples | 14
English4
TABLE 1: Respondents per Year Level per Section
YEAR & SECTION N n
1st YEAR
Mapagkawanggawa
Mapagkaisa
Mapagmahal
Magalang
39
48
40
48
15
18
15
18
2nd YEAR
Mapagpakumbaba
Mapagkaisa
Mapagmalasakit
Matapat
27
46
47
47
10
18
18
18
3rd YEAR
Mapagmalasakit
Mapagpakumbaba
Matiyaga
Mapayapa
45
23
45
45
17
9
17
17
4th YEAR
Mapagbigay
Mapagkaisa
Mapagmalasakit
48
46
44
18
18
17
TOTAL 638 243
7/30/2019 Empowerment Indicators
22/47
Patrick Edward Laureta Balisong/ Empowerment of Indigenous Peoples | 15
English4
Data Gathering Tool
The researcher used an array of references and related literature in order
to strengthen his claims and to validate and interpret the data through
comparison in order to probe and improve current practices.
The researcher also sought pieces of advice from his research adviser
and other experts on the field of social science and indigenous people
empowerment.
A questionnaire was used to evaluate empowerment indicators of
indigenous peoples groups. The questionnaire was floated to 10 students from
the first year, 10 students from the second year, 10 students from the third year
and 10 students from the fourth year for validation. These students were not
included in the study. After the copies had been filled up they were collected by
the researcher to re-examine the questionnaire. Items in question went through
revision.
Data Gathering Procedure
The researcher was sent to the libraries of Saint Louis University
Laboratory High School, Saint Louis University and the University of the
Philippines Baguio to gather information and to create a draft of his chapters. He
was also permitted to use internet resources.
A questionnaire based on the empowerment indicators of indigenous
peoples groups was prepared. It was patterned with the questionnaire used by
Alsop and Heinsohn (2005) in their study on the empowerment indicators of
7/30/2019 Empowerment Indicators
23/47
Patrick Edward Laureta Balisong/ Empowerment of Indigenous Peoples | 16
English4
indigenous peoples in Africa. It was validated and then floated to the sample
population.
The questionnaire was floated to the respondents on December 2011 and
was collected during the researchers free time.
Statistical Treatment
The data gathered shall be treated statistically.
First, the researcher looked into the frequency of self- determination and
participation of the students in their indigenous groups and its practices. The
researcher also looked in to the frequency of the incorporation of indigenous
traditions and practices. Second, the researcher also asked the students
assessments of different school activities which may or may not be affected by
membership in indigenous peoples groups. The researcher also asked the
student to assess the schools atmosphere, whether or not it is uplifting the status
of indigenous peoples. The percentage was used in order to identify those that
were needed.
The formula is as follows:
Where in: % = percentage
F = frequency
N= number of respondents
The frequencies receiving the highest values are indicative of the
frequencies of feeling empowerment on internal and external levels. In
7/30/2019 Empowerment Indicators
24/47
Patrick Edward Laureta Balisong/ Empowerment of Indigenous Peoples | 17
English4
giving the interpretation to the frequency of feeling internal and external
empowerment indicators, the following was used:
LIMITS RATE
01.00- 15.00 Never
16.00 30.00 Rarely
31.00- 45.00 Sometimes
46.00- 60.00 Often
61.00- 75.00 Always
Gauges receiving the highest values reflect the assessment of students of
the school environment relative to the empowerment of indigenous peoples.
In interpreting the assessment of the schools social environment, whether
it is conducive for the holistic development of indigenous peoples, the following
was used:
LIMITS RATE
01.00- 15.00 Strongly Disagree
16.00 30.00 Disagree
31.00- 45.00 Fairly Agree
46.00- 60.00 Agree
61.00- 75.00 Strongly Agree
7/30/2019 Empowerment Indicators
25/47
Patrick Edward Laureta Balisong/ Empowerment of Indigenous Peoples | 18
English4
CHAPTER 3
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
The presentation, analysis and interpretation of gathered data on the
empowerment indicators of indigenous peoples for the school year 2011- 2012
were presented on this chapter.
Internal Indicators
The researcher determined the frequency of self- identification, use of
mother tongue and participation of students as internal indicators of
empowerment as was done in the study conducted by Alsop and Heinsohn
(2005).
Table 2: Frequency of the Presence of Internal Indicators of Empowerment of
Members of Indigenous Peoples Groups in SLU-LHS
INTERNAL INDICATORS PERCENTAGE DESCRIPTION
Self- identification of membership in
indigenous groups
30.08 Sometimes
Use of mother tongue 24.25 Rarely
Participation in indigenous practicesor activities
31.78 Sometimes
It can be seen from the table that 30.08% of the students only identify
themselves as members of cultural minorities sometimes.
Students either do not know that they are members of cultural minorities
or they are ashamed to disclose their indigenous roots with their fellow students.
Majority of the ethno linguistic groups of the Philippines lived in the uplands;
7/30/2019 Empowerment Indicators
26/47
Patrick Edward Laureta Balisong/ Empowerment of Indigenous Peoples | 19
English4
however, many have chosen to move to the cities to find sources of living,
especially during times of scarcity and to seek greater educational opportunities
and other opportunities thereafter. The change in settlement areas of the
ancestors as well as various inter- marriages that happened after the Diasporas,
have caused the loss of indigenous ties. Furthermore, the image that has been
imprinted on the minds of the lowlanders has discouraged indigenous peoples to
identify themselves (Costina & Difuntorum, 2001). The lack of self- identification
has a large political and psychological implication both on the members of
indigenous communities and mainstream society. Many would say that for others
to accept a person, one must learn to accept himself. Socio-political structures,
especially in the academe rely heavily on individual contact relationships,
meaning, authentic human relationships are formed not on the basis of corporate
relationships such as that of companies but personal relationships which are
founded on ones understanding and recognition of himself and of society
(Dunita, 1986). Self- identification or the relative lack of such, within the institution
means that the relationships are subject to easy deterioration upon revelation of
certain information not disclosed properly. Society has a hard time accepting
neo- liberal ideas because the people who are the subject of these ideas could
not accept it themselves. Perhaps, they are afraid of what judgement they would
receive upon claiming their roots, but what they should truly be afraid of is the
judgement they would get when it comes from other people (Guia, 2005).
Majority of students rarely use their mother tongue in communicating, both
at home and in school. It has become hard for students to find others who could
7/30/2019 Empowerment Indicators
27/47
Patrick Edward Laureta Balisong/ Empowerment of Indigenous Peoples | 20
English4
speak in the same dialect as they do. There are very few areas in the cities
where there is a concentration of only one indigenous group; school, especially,
has become a melting pot of different cultures and thus it has become difficult for
people to speak in their native tongues (Dandenaeu et al, 2008). The
establishment of a national language caused many to forget their dialects. It is a
challenge for many to speak straight Kankana-ey or straight Ilocano because
they have been reared in relatively new environments; many would combine
dialects with the Filipino language and as a result they are mocked by others,
these events have caused many to abandon their mother tongue (Goda, 2001).
Thus it could be implied that, the inability or refusal to speak in the native dialect
further widens the gap between a person and his culture (Goda, 2001) which
leads us back to the socio-political implications stated earlier.
Majority of the students also said that they only participate in their different
traditional practices sometimes. The ineffective transfer of culture and tradition
from one generation to the next could account for the general lack of participation
of the members. Certain cultures have mixed with others which makes it more
difficult to understand and practice (Finn, 2005). Thus, it could be implied that
despite the growth of neo- liberal ideologies, members of cultural minorities
remain reluctant to assume acceptance from and understanding by the modern
world. Perhaps their reluctance to open themselves to such ideas further
strengthens the stigma.
As the findings of Costina and Difuntorum (2001) were treated as results
of the lack of indigenous empowerment during the post- colonial era; the
7/30/2019 Empowerment Indicators
28/47
Patrick Edward Laureta Balisong/ Empowerment of Indigenous Peoples | 21
English4
researcher treats his gathered data as reasons why mainstream society, no
matter how liberated, still experiences difficulty in accepting and understanding
indigenous practices.
Generally, the findings tell us that internal indicators of empowerment are
only observed and felt sometimes.
External Indicators
The researcher further looked into the incorporation of indigenous
traditions and practices in school activities and lessons taught in class as
external indicators of empowerment (Goda, 2001). Empowerment, or the lack
thereof, can be measured through the institutions commitment in opening
opportunities for indigenous peoples.
It can be seen from the table that indigenous practices and beliefs are only
incorporated in school activities and class discussions sometimes.
Table 3: Frequency of Incorporation and Reassessment of Indigenous Practices
and Traditions in School Activities and Classroom Discussions
EXTERNAL INDICATORS PERCENTAGE DESCRIPTION
Incorporation of indigenous practicesin school activities
34.75 Sometimes
Reassessment of indigenouspractices in class discussions
32.20 Sometimes
It can be seen that 34.75% of the students only observe the incorporation
of indigenous practices in school activities sometimes. There is a lack of
observable advances to make the students appreciate indigenous performances.
During informal dialogues with club advisers and teachers, they said that the lack
7/30/2019 Empowerment Indicators
29/47
Patrick Edward Laureta Balisong/ Empowerment of Indigenous Peoples | 22
English4
of cultural presentations during school activities is a result of pop culture, they
said that most of the students lack the maturity to appreciate, much less
understand these deviant art forms; hence, they are seldom or not at all
presented during gatherings (Alcantara, 2012).
Thus, it could be implied that the reintroduction of culture- based clubs
and organizations in the institution is vital in the empowerment of indigenous
groups. Perhaps the beats of Bad Romance by Lady Gaga or We Found Love
by Rhianna are far more entertaining than hearing the hitting of gongs during a
Caao, but that does not mean that one should stop trying to reintroduce these
activities. The want of many to merely entertain the audience rather than educate
them has hindered appreciation for and understanding of these practices (Goda,
2001).
It could also be seen that majority of the students say that emphasis on
indigenous peoples, practices and traditions is only seen sometimes. According
to Mr. Ronaldo Pontanosa (2012), Assistant Principal for Academics, the
Department of Educations curriculum gives little emphasis on teaching the
students about the different ethno linguistic groups in the Philippines. It could
also be observed from reviewing the notes and lesson plans of Social Studies I
teachers that they only commit at most three days in making the students
understand the different indigenous groups. Furthermore, in interviews with the
various Learning Area Coordinators, the researcher noted that, although
knowledge about such subject is divulged to students, it is only done by passing;
they are only mentioned if the lesson calls for it (Flores, 2012). Thus, it could be
7/30/2019 Empowerment Indicators
30/47
Patrick Edward Laureta Balisong/ Empowerment of Indigenous Peoples | 23
English4
implied that the stigma rises from the lack of knowledge about indigenous
groups. The misunderstanding of practices has caused many offensive advances
among cultures and religions; take for instance Christian Catholics making fun of
Muslims for kissing the floor and the Muslims making fun of the Christian
Catholics for symbolic cannibalism during communion (Guia, 2005). There is a
great need for teachers to help eradicate the stigma and make the students
understand what they cannot.
The researcher believes that the lack of commitment from the
academe to inform the students about different indigenous practices inside the
classroom has caused the depreciation of indigenous art forms.
School Environment
Finally, the researcher asked the students to assess the school
environment in terms of empowering indigenous peoples. Another measure of
empowerment is seen in how membership affects the different organizations
within the institution (Onaga & Manuel, 2004).
According to the study of Alsop and Heinsohn (2005), the most desirable
results for these kinds of questions are those that would indicate no or little
affect. They further explain their idea by saying that, if membership in cultural
minorities still affects organizations and groups, whether in a positive or negative
manner, there is no sense of equality between and among the members.
7/30/2019 Empowerment Indicators
31/47
Patrick Edward Laureta Balisong/ Empowerment of Indigenous Peoples | 24
English4
Table 4: Students assessment of effects of membership in indigenous
peoples groups in different school organizations
INDICATORS PERCENTAGE DESCRIPTION
Membership affects studentelections 37.71 Fairly Agree
Membership affects peer grouping 38.14 Fairly Agree
It can be observed from the table that students fairly agree to saying that
membership in cultural minorities affect peer grouping.
Commonalities usually spark the beginning of peer groups. Members of
cultural minorities group together so they may freely exercise their beliefs. Thus,
it could be implied that members of indigenous communities are afraid to open
themselves to joining other peer groups which do not practice what they do;
furthermore, it shows their refusal to allow outsiders to enter their peer groups
because of fear of judgement (Finn, 2005). This exclusivist nature has proven to
be detrimental in the societys understanding of indigenous cultures.
It could also be observed from the table that 38.14% of students fairly
agree that student elections are affected by membership in indigenous groups.
During national and local elections in the Philippines, it could be observed
that indigenous groups usually support the candidate who came from their group;
they usually discount the more important aspects such as capabilities and
credentials. Thus, it could be implied that there seems to be a race to the top
amongst the different ethnic groups to place a representative in power; such
practice is a glaring indication that there remains popular demand between and
7/30/2019 Empowerment Indicators
32/47
Patrick Edward Laureta Balisong/ Empowerment of Indigenous Peoples | 25
English4
amongst these groups to feel empowered (Bellom, 1972) and it is apparent that
such practice still remains in the four corners of the school.
7/30/2019 Empowerment Indicators
33/47
Patrick Edward Laureta Balisong/ Empowerment of Indigenous Peoples | 26
English4
CHAPTER 4
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Presented in this chapter are the conclusions based on the findings
and the recommendations of the study.
Conclusions
Based on the result of the study, the following conclusions have been
made:
1. Internal indicators of empowerment among the students are only felt
sometimes. Students only identify their indigenous roots sometimes, and
they rarely spoke in their mother tongue; they only participate in
indigenous practices sometimes.
2. External indicators of empowerment are only observed sometimes.
Incorporation of indigenous practices in school activities and
reassessment of indigenous cultures, beliefs and practices are only done
sometimes.
3. The schools social environment is fairly conducive for the empowerment
of indigenous communities. Students fairly agree that membership in
indigenous groups affect student elections and peer grouping.
Recommendations
Based on the study, it was found out that empowerment indicators for
indigenous communities are only present in school sometimes and that the
schools social environment is fairly catering to the empowerment of these
7/30/2019 Empowerment Indicators
34/47
Patrick Edward Laureta Balisong/ Empowerment of Indigenous Peoples | 27
English4
members of such communities. Thus, the following recommendations were
forwarded:
1. Students must trace their indigenous roots and must not be ashamed to
declare their heritage, especially to fellow students who are part of other
groups and of mainstream society.
2. Students should learn to speak their respective dialects as a symbol of
their attachment to their heritage and reverence to the groups they belong
to.
3. Students should also learn their ancestors cultures, beliefs, practices and
traditions and participate in them, whenever chance permits them to.
4. Students should learn to create relationships with members of other
indigenous groups or with members of mainstream society for them to be
better understood and for them to understand other cultures as well.
5. Respect for other cultures must be developed as part of the students
values formation.
6. Teachers should help the students get rid of the stigma against indigenous
groups through extensive discussions of cultures and practices.
7. Teachers and administrators should encourage culture- based
performances like folk dancing during school activities despite the
majoritys preference of popular culture.
8. Administrators should support projects that encourage understanding of
indigenous cultures such as field trips and immersions.
7/30/2019 Empowerment Indicators
35/47
Patrick Edward Laureta Balisong/ Empowerment of Indigenous Peoples | 28
English4
9. Administrators should devise a plan to rid the students of their stigma
against cultural groups; things like seminars, talks and counselling
especially for those who are victims of peer bullying based on cultural
affiliation and those who victimize them.
10. To researchers, it is highly recommended that an extensive study on the
reasons behind the results obtained be made to further strengthen the
claims made by the researcher.
7/30/2019 Empowerment Indicators
36/47
Patrick Edward Laureta Balisong/ Empowerment of Indigenous Peoples | 29
English4
REFEREED MATERIALS
Books
Bellom, M.C. (1972). Kankanay Social Organization and Culture
Change.Community Development Research Council, University of the
Philippines.
Carino, M. L. A. (1990).Cordillera Tales. Quezon City: New day Publishers.
Costina, V. R. & Disfuntorum, M. L. S. (Ed). (2001). Towards Understanding
Peoples of the Cordillera: A Review of Research on History,
Governance, Resources, institutions and Living Traditions. Baguio City:
Cordillera Studies Centre.
Dandenaeu, S., Hunt, P., Bamba, J., Andersen, T., Poppel, B., Sarkar, S., et al.
(2008). Indicators Relevant for Indigenous Peoples: A Resource Book.
Stankovitch, M.(Ed). Baguio City: Tebtebba Foundation.
Dunita, M. A. (1986). The Ifugao World. Edades, J. (Ed). Quezon City: New Day
Publishers.
Finn, G. A. (2005). The Making of the Igorot. Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila
University Press.
Goda, T. (2001). Cordillera: Diversity in Culture Change.Pasamonte, L. (Ed).
Quezon City: New Day Publishers.
Keesing, F. M. (1962). The Ethno History of Northern Luzon. Stanford, California:
Stanford University Press.
Onaga, N. & Manuel, E. L. (2004). Using the International Human Rights
Framework to Empower Indigenous Communities in the Philippines.
7/30/2019 Empowerment Indicators
37/47
Patrick Edward Laureta Balisong/ Empowerment of Indigenous Peoples | 30
English4
Diliman, Quezon City: Legal Rights and Natural Resources Centre, Inc.-
Kasama sa Kalinisan.
On Line Resources
Alsop, R. and Heisohn, N. (2005). Measuring empowerment in practice.
_____________________. Retrieved on August 13,2011 from
http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTEMPOWERMENT/Resources/413
07_wps3510.pdf.
Department of American Comparative Cultures, Washington State University.
(1999). The Paradox of Multiculturalism: Ethnicity and Identity in the
Philippines. Washington: San Juan, E. Retrieved on August 13, 2011
from http://ethnicfilipinos.ph/filer/toledo-cebu/The-Paradox-of-
Multiculturalism.pdf
Guia, K. (2005). Indigenous Filipino Values: A Foundation for a Culture of Non-
Violence. Pasig: Anvil Publishing, Inc. Retrieved on August 13,2011 from
http://ethnicfilipinos.ph/filer/Indigenous-Filipino-Values.pdf.
McClellan, D. & Tanner, K. (2011). Knowledge Discovery Empowering Australian
Indigenous Communities.USC Annenberg School for Communication
and Jouranlism. Retrieved on August 13,2011 from
http://itidjournal.org/itid/article/viewFile/733/313.
RNIP Regional Assembly. (2007). Indigenous Peoples in the Philippines. Hanoi,
Vietnam: De Vera, D. E. Retrieved on August 13,2011 from
http://www.iapad.org/publications/ppgis/devera_ip_phl.pdf
http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTEMPOWERMENT/Resources/41307_wps3510.pdfhttp://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTEMPOWERMENT/Resources/41307_wps3510.pdfhttp://ethnicfilipinos.ph/filer/toledo-cebu/The-Paradox-of-Multiculturalism.pdfhttp://ethnicfilipinos.ph/filer/toledo-cebu/The-Paradox-of-Multiculturalism.pdfhttp://ethnicfilipinos.ph/filer/Indigenous-Filipino-Values.pdfhttp://itidjournal.org/itid/article/viewFile/733/313http://www.iapad.org/publications/ppgis/devera_ip_phl.pdfhttp://www.iapad.org/publications/ppgis/devera_ip_phl.pdfhttp://itidjournal.org/itid/article/viewFile/733/313http://ethnicfilipinos.ph/filer/Indigenous-Filipino-Values.pdfhttp://ethnicfilipinos.ph/filer/toledo-cebu/The-Paradox-of-Multiculturalism.pdfhttp://ethnicfilipinos.ph/filer/toledo-cebu/The-Paradox-of-Multiculturalism.pdfhttp://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTEMPOWERMENT/Resources/41307_wps3510.pdfhttp://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTEMPOWERMENT/Resources/41307_wps3510.pdf7/30/2019 Empowerment Indicators
38/47
Patrick Edward Laureta Balisong/ Empowerment of Indigenous Peoples | 31
English4
United Nations Committee on Elimination of Racial Discrimination. (2009).
Committe on Elimination of Racial Discrimination Considers Report of
the Philippines. Geneva, Switzerland. Retrieved on August 13, 2011 from
http://ethnicfilipinos.ph/filer/Report-Elimination-of-Racial-
Discrimination.pdf
United Nations Development Programme. (2008). Indigenous Peoples in the
Philippines. Retrieved on August 13,2011 from
http://www.undp.org.ph/Downloads/fastFacts/fosteringDemocraticGovern
ance/2010/fastFacts6%20-
%20Indigenous%20Peoples%20in%20the%20Philippines%20rev%201.5
United Nations Development Programme. (2010). Human Development and
Indigenous Peoples. New York City, New York. Retrieved on August 13,
2011 from
http://hdr.undp.org/en/media/IP_Experts_Meeting_HDR_2010_Jan2010.
pdf.
World Bank Policy Working Research. (2005). Measuring Empowerment in
Practice: Structuring Analysis and Framing Indicators.Alsop, R. &
Heinsohn, N. Retrieved on August 13,2011 from
http://www.sasanet.org/documents/Curriculum/ConceptualFramework/M
easuring%20Empowerment%20in%20Practice.pdf.
http://ethnicfilipinos.ph/filer/Report-Elimination-of-Racial-Discrimination.pdfhttp://ethnicfilipinos.ph/filer/Report-Elimination-of-Racial-Discrimination.pdfhttp://www.undp.org.ph/Downloads/fastFacts/fosteringDemocraticGovernance/2010/fastFacts6%20-%20Indigenous%20Peoples%20in%20the%20Philippines%20rev%201.5.pdfhttp://www.undp.org.ph/Downloads/fastFacts/fosteringDemocraticGovernance/2010/fastFacts6%20-%20Indigenous%20Peoples%20in%20the%20Philippines%20rev%201.5.pdfhttp://www.undp.org.ph/Downloads/fastFacts/fosteringDemocraticGovernance/2010/fastFacts6%20-%20Indigenous%20Peoples%20in%20the%20Philippines%20rev%201.5.pdfhttp://www.undp.org.ph/Downloads/fastFacts/fosteringDemocraticGovernance/2010/fastFacts6%20-%20Indigenous%20Peoples%20in%20the%20Philippines%20rev%201.5.pdfhttp://hdr.undp.org/en/media/IP_Experts_Meeting_HDR_2010_Jan2010.pdfhttp://hdr.undp.org/en/media/IP_Experts_Meeting_HDR_2010_Jan2010.pdfhttp://www.sasanet.org/documents/Curriculum/ConceptualFramework/Measuring%20Empowerment%20in%20Practice.pdfhttp://www.sasanet.org/documents/Curriculum/ConceptualFramework/Measuring%20Empowerment%20in%20Practice.pdfhttp://www.sasanet.org/documents/Curriculum/ConceptualFramework/Measuring%20Empowerment%20in%20Practice.pdfhttp://www.sasanet.org/documents/Curriculum/ConceptualFramework/Measuring%20Empowerment%20in%20Practice.pdfhttp://hdr.undp.org/en/media/IP_Experts_Meeting_HDR_2010_Jan2010.pdfhttp://hdr.undp.org/en/media/IP_Experts_Meeting_HDR_2010_Jan2010.pdfhttp://www.undp.org.ph/Downloads/fastFacts/fosteringDemocraticGovernance/2010/fastFacts6%20-%20Indigenous%20Peoples%20in%20the%20Philippines%20rev%201.5.pdfhttp://www.undp.org.ph/Downloads/fastFacts/fosteringDemocraticGovernance/2010/fastFacts6%20-%20Indigenous%20Peoples%20in%20the%20Philippines%20rev%201.5.pdfhttp://www.undp.org.ph/Downloads/fastFacts/fosteringDemocraticGovernance/2010/fastFacts6%20-%20Indigenous%20Peoples%20in%20the%20Philippines%20rev%201.5.pdfhttp://www.undp.org.ph/Downloads/fastFacts/fosteringDemocraticGovernance/2010/fastFacts6%20-%20Indigenous%20Peoples%20in%20the%20Philippines%20rev%201.5.pdfhttp://ethnicfilipinos.ph/filer/Report-Elimination-of-Racial-Discrimination.pdfhttp://ethnicfilipinos.ph/filer/Report-Elimination-of-Racial-Discrimination.pdf7/30/2019 Empowerment Indicators
39/47
Patrick Edward Laureta Balisong/ Empowerment of Indigenous Peoples | 32
English4
______.Retrieved on August 13,2011 form http://ethnicfilipinos.ph/filer/toledo-
cebu/chapter_2.pdf
Unpublished Theses
Arrellano, K.J. (2011). Writing tasks in English- to- demonstrate- awareness and
understanding of Filipino values. Saint Louis University-Laboratory High
School. Baguio City.
Pambid, R.J. (2011). Effects of student involvement in extra-curricular and co-
curricular activities to their study habits. Saint Louis University-Laboratory
High School. Baguio City.
Interviews
Alcantara, D., Estipular, G., Magbual , M. & Tenaza, S. (2012, January 15). Lack
of culture- based performances during school programs. (P. Balisong,
Interviewer).
Pontanosa, R. (2012, January 15). Incorporation of indigenous practices in the
schools curriculum. (P. Balisong, Interviewer).
Alim, J., Endrano, F., Espiritu, R., Flores, Z., Laguyo, C., Tadeo, S. et al (2012,
January 15). Incorporation of indigenous practices in the teachers lesson
plans. (P. Balisong, Interviewer).
http://ethnicfilipinos.ph/filer/toledo-cebu/chapter_2.pdfhttp://ethnicfilipinos.ph/filer/toledo-cebu/chapter_2.pdfhttp://ethnicfilipinos.ph/filer/toledo-cebu/chapter_2.pdfhttp://ethnicfilipinos.ph/filer/toledo-cebu/chapter_2.pdf7/30/2019 Empowerment Indicators
40/47
Patrick Edward Laureta Balisong/ Empowerment of Indigenous Peoples | 33
English4
APPENDIX A
The Questionnaire
7/30/2019 Empowerment Indicators
41/47
Patrick Edward Laureta Balisong/ Empowerment of Indigenous Peoples | 34
English4
Saint Louis UniversityLaboratory High School
C.M. Recto Street, Navy Road, St. Joseph Village, Baguio City
Dear Respondent,
The researcher is conducting a study on the empowerment indicators ofindigenous people groups in SLU-LHS for the school year 2011-2012. The study aims todetermine strategic ways to address the clamours of the minorities. In this regard, theresearcher requests you to honestly answer the question. Rest assured that yourresponses will be treated with utmost confidentiality
Thank you very much for your participation!Respectfully yours,
Patrick Edward L. BalisongIV- Mapagpakumaba
The Researcher
Year and Section: _________________Age: _______
Instructions: Check the box which corresponds to your answer.
Legend:A-Always O- Often S- Sometimes R-Rarely N-Never
SA-StronglyAgree
Ag-Agree FA- FairlyAgree
D-Disagree SD-StronglyDisagree
A O S R N1. Do you tell fellow students that you are a
member of a minority?2. Do you speak in your native tongue in
school?3. Do you participate in your traditional
practices and activities?4. Are indigenous traditions incorporated in
school activities?5. Do lessons in school reassess indigenous
traditions, beliefs, etc.?SA Ag FA D SD
6. Membership in indigenous groups affectsstudent elections.
7. Membership in indigenous groups affectspeer grouping.
7/30/2019 Empowerment Indicators
42/47
Patrick Edward Laureta Balisong/ Empowerment of Indigenous Peoples | 35
English4
APPENDIX B
Tables
7/30/2019 Empowerment Indicators
43/47
Patrick Edward Laureta Balisong/ Empowerment of Indigenous Peoples | 36
English4
TABLE 1: Respondents per Year Level per Section
YEAR & SECTION N n
1st YEAR
Mapagkawanggawa
Mapagkaisa
Mapagmahal
Magalang
39
48
40
48
15
18
15
18
2nd YEAR
Mapagpakumbaba
Mapagkaisa
Mapagmalasakit
Matapat
27
46
47
47
10
18
18
18
3rd YEAR
Mapagmalasakit
Mapagpakumbaba
Matiyaga
Mapayapa
45
23
45
45
17
9
17
17
4th YEAR
Mapagbigay
Mapagkaisa
Mapagmalasakit
48
46
44
18
18
17
TOTAL 638 243
7/30/2019 Empowerment Indicators
44/47
Patrick Edward Laureta Balisong/ Empowerment of Indigenous Peoples | 37
English4
Table 2: Frequency of the Presence of Internal Indicators of Empowerment of
Members of Indigenous Peoples Groups in SLU-LHS
INTERNAL INDICATORS PERCENTAGE DESCRIPTIONSelf- identification of membership in
indigenous groups30.08 Sometimes
Use of mother tongue 24.25 Rarely
Participation in indigenous practicesor activities
31.78 Sometimes
Table 2.1: Frequency of Self- Identification of Membership in Indigenous Groups
FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
Always 35 14.83
Often 27 11.44
Sometimes 71 30.08
Rarely 62 26.27
Never 41 17.37
7/30/2019 Empowerment Indicators
45/47
Patrick Edward Laureta Balisong/ Empowerment of Indigenous Peoples | 38
English4
Table 2.2: Frequency of the Use of the Mother Tongue
FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
Always 35 14.83
Often 50 21.19
Sometimes 56 23.73
Rarely 57 24.15
Never 38 16.10
Table 2.3: Frequency of Participation in Traditional Practices
FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
Always 45 19.07
Often 44 18.64
Sometimes 75 31.78
Rarely 47 19.91
Never 25 10.59
Table 2.2: Frequency of the Use of the Mother Tongue
FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
Always 35 14.83
Often 50 21.19
Sometimes 56 23.73
Rarely 57 24.15
Never 38 16.10
7/30/2019 Empowerment Indicators
46/47
Patrick Edward Laureta Balisong/ Empowerment of Indigenous Peoples | 39
English4
Table 3: Frequency of Incorporation and Reassessment of Indigenous Practices
and Traditions in School Activities and Classroom Discussions
EXTERNAL INDICATORS PERCENTAGE DESCRIPTIONIncorporation of indigenous practices
in school activities34.75 Sometimes
Reassessment of indigenouspractices in class discussions
32.20 Sometimes
Table 3.1: Frequency of Incorporation of Culture- based Performances during
School Activities
FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
Always 20 8.47
Often 46 19.49
Sometimes 82 34.75
Rarely 67 28.39
Never 21 8.80
Table 3.2: Frequency of Incorporation of Indigenous Beliefs in Class Discussions
FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
Always 30 12.71
Often 62 26.27
Sometimes 76 32.20
Rarely 45 19.07
Never 23 9.75
7/30/2019 Empowerment Indicators
47/47
Patrick Edward Laureta Balisong/ Empowerment of Indigenous Peoples | 40
Table 4: Students assessment of effects of membership in indigenous
peoples groups in different school organizations
INDICATORS PERCENTAGE DESCRIPTION
Membership affects student
elections 37.71% Fairly Agree
Membership affects peer grouping 38.14% Fairly Agree
Table 4.1: Membership in Indigenous groups Affects Student Elections
FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
Strongly Agree 27 11.44
Agree 61 25.85
Fairly Agree 89 37.71
Disagree 44 18.64
Strongly Disagree 15 6.36
Table 4.1: Membership in Indigenous groups Peer Grouping
FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
Strongly Agree 36 15.25
Agree 66 27.97
Fairly Agree 90 38.14
Disagree 32 13.56
Strongly Disagree 12 5.08