Date post: | 27-Mar-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | colin-cantrell |
View: | 216 times |
Download: | 0 times |
ENENRegional Policy
EUROPEAN COMMISSION
JASPERS, JEREMIE & JESSICA3 joint policy initiativesfor improving investments and access to finance
presented by Pierre Godin, European Commission, DG Regional Policy
based on 3 sets of slides prepared by:- Brendan Smyth, DG Regio (for Jaspers) - Emilio de la Guardia, EIB (for Jaspers) - Georges Kolivas, DG Regio (for Jeremie & Jessica)
ENEA meeting, 09/06/2006, La Coruña, Spain
JASPERS, JEREMIE & JESSICA3 joint policy initiativesfor improving investments and access to finance
presented by Pierre Godin, European Commission, DG Regional Policy
based on 3 sets of slides prepared by:- Brendan Smyth, DG Regio (for Jaspers) - Emilio de la Guardia, EIB (for Jaspers) - Georges Kolivas, DG Regio (for Jeremie & Jessica)
ENEA meeting, 09/06/2006, La Coruña, Spain
Regional Policy
EUROPEAN COMMISSIONEN
ENEN
22
– JASPERS (Joint Assistance to Support Projects in European Regions)
– One of the three « J » babies (together with Jeremie & Urban development Jessica) > Joint effort.
– A technical assistance partnership to prepare major projects between DG REGIO, EIB and EBRD
– JASPERS is an additional technical assistance
resource for the MS and for DG REGIO
– value added: drawing on past experience and
expertise of the EIB and the EBRD in a more
structured and coordinated way.
Increase beneficiary’s absorption capacity
Part 1 – JASPERSPart 1 – JASPERS
Regional Policy
EUROPEAN COMMISSIONEN
ENEN
33
JASPERS: free and voluntary
– JASPERS assistance will be provided free of charge to
the beneficiary
– There will be no obligation on the Member States to
use JASPERS
– There will be no obligation on a Member State which
benefits from JASPERS to borrow from the EIB or the
EBRD
– There will no obligation on the EIB or the EBRD to lend
to projects prepared using JASPERS
– There will be no exclusion of EIB or EBRD lending to
projects benefiting from JASPERS
Regional Policy
EUROPEAN COMMISSIONEN
ENEN
44
LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES
JASPERS does not change existing legal responsibilities
JASPERS is an input to the preparation of applications for EU funding
Member States are the 'owners' of the project, not JASPERS; they submit the standard applications as required by the Regulations
preparation of a project by JASPERS does not guarantee approval of the project by the Commission
the ultimate legal responsibility to grant assistance to a project will remain with the Commission
Regional Policy
EUROPEAN COMMISSIONEN
ENEN
55
• JASPERS concentrates its activities in major projects :Transport > €50 MEnvironment & other > €25 M
• JASPERS priorities are :
- large projects supported by the Cohesion Fund and the ERDF (to be interpreted flexibly in the smaller MS)
- other Cohesion Fund and ERDF projects
• sectors most likely to receive assistance: roads, rail, public transport, water supply, waste water treatment, solid waste but also tourism, energy, etc.
[JASPERS will concentrate on New Member States, Romania and Bulgaria]
JASPERS’ Activities
Regional Policy
EUROPEAN COMMISSIONEN
ENEN
66
2006 ACTION PLANS: FINDINGS
JASPERS is up and starts running All beneficiary countries submitted draft Action Plans 112 project actions identified, and support requested
in wide range of relevant horizontal issues Demand in some unexpected sectors (eg. large
energy, broadband telecom, tourism)
JASPERS is well received by beneficiary countries and DG-REGIO desks
JASPERS intervention requested for projects totaling € 57 Bn grant funding by CF and ERDF
6
Regional Policy
EUROPEAN COMMISSIONEN
ENEN
77
Environment sectorEnvironment sector 56 actions56 actions
Water & waste water 20 actions
Solid Waste 16 actions
Energy efficiency & renewable 12 actions
Other sectors (Tourism, telecoms – broadband, health & education)
8 actions
Transport sectorTransport sector 46 actions46 actions
Roads & Motorways 15 actions
Railways 16 actions
Urban transport 7 actions
Other sub-sectors (river, airports) 8 actions
7
Regional Policy
EUROPEAN COMMISSIONEN
ENEN
88
Main Horizontal Issues
for which support is requested
• PPP+grant blending approaches
• Support with state aid in new sectors
• Structuring projects in new sectors (eg. power, energy efficiency, renewables, urban transport, flood protection, rolling stock)
• Grouping small projects (eg. energy efficiency, water)
• PPP best practice / model approaches
• Guidance on new Regulations (eg. eligibility, revenue generating projects, grant rate calculation)
8
Regional Policy
EUROPEAN COMMISSIONEN
ENEN
99
Horizontal issuesHorizontal issues 32 issues32 issues
Environment sector 5 issues
Energy sector 5 issues
Other sectors 2 issues
Transport sector 11 issues
Common issues to all 9 issues
Regional Policy
EUROPEAN COMMISSIONEN
ENEN
1010
Applying for assistance from JASPERS
Managing Authority acts as central coordinator for each country
Phase of Project preparation: the Managing Authority in the MS can request assistance directly from JASPERS in Luxembourg or to the regional offices of JASPERS.
Phase of Project appraisal: when an application for assistance has been received, DG REGIO can request assistance from JASPERS in Luxembourg
Regional Policy
EUROPEAN COMMISSIONEN
ENEN
1111
• JEREMIE stands for ‘Joint European REsources for MIcro to medium Enterprises’
• ‘ Joint resources’ because JEREMIE combines resources from ERDF + national public sector + EIB+ other IFIs, banks & fin. intermediaries.
• JEREMIE is not an organisation but a series of coherent actions
• JEREMIE gives special emphasis to technology transfer, start-ups, technology and innovation funds, and micro-credits.
Part 2 – JEREMIE Part 2 – JEREMIE
Regional Policy
EUROPEAN COMMISSIONEN
ENEN
1212
Why JEREMIE? Because …Why JEREMIE? Because …
• Better access to finance for SMEs in the regions is needed
• Renewed Lisbon Strategy and CSG stress the need to improve financial products and instruments
Regional Policy
EUROPEAN COMMISSIONEN
ENEN
1313
Main Actors of JEREMIEMain Actors of JEREMIE
• Commission: DG REGIO with ENTR and ECFIN
• EIF + EIB (EIB as loan capital provider)
• Other IFIs, mainly the EBRD for the 8 new MS, Council of Europe Dev. Bank (CEB)
• Other specialized financial intermediaries, I.E. KfW (DE), Caisse des dépots (FR),etc
Regional Policy
EUROPEAN COMMISSIONEN
ENEN
1414
Main Actors of JEREMIEMain Actors of JEREMIE
• MS, Regions and managing authorities
• National and regional banks and financial intermediaries, investors
• SMEs,
including Micro credit (up to 25.000 EUR) beneficiaries (Unemployed,Young or old first time entrepreneurs,Women,minorities)
Regional Policy
EUROPEAN COMMISSIONEN
ENEN
1515
JEREMIE PHASESJEREMIE PHASESPhase 1 : Preparation (action plans and Ops)
• Evaluations (2006-2007): gap analysis in access to finance (demand/supply) and action plans.
• Action plans are used for the preparation of OPs.
Phase 2: Implementation (HF and FI)
• A Managing Authority (MA) signs a funding agreement with a selected Holding Fund (HF).
• The HF selects Financial Intermediaries (FI), gives accreditation to FI and provides funds to FI.
Phase 3: Support from FI for SMEs and micro-credit
Equity & venture capital, loans, guarantees, advice.
Regional Policy
EUROPEAN COMMISSIONEN
ENEN
1616
Recycling JEREMIE resourcesRecycling JEREMIE resources
• At the closure of OPs at the end of 2015, ERDF grants transferred to Holding Funds must have been used at least once, paid out of FI to finance SMEs and micro-credit beneficiaries (if not, money is recovered).
• Contributions from OP invested in SMEs under JEREMIE, when repaid to funds or holding funds, belong to the MS or MA.
• Such Repaid resources must be invested again in favour of SMEs.
Regional Policy
EUROPEAN COMMISSIONEN
ENEN
1717
Part 3 - JESSICA
• JESSICA stands for Joint European Support for Sustainable Investment in City Areas
• JESSICA is an optional facility
• JESSICA offers Member States (MS) and Managing Authorities (MA) the possibility to "transform" grants from Operational Programmes (OPs), into repayable and recyclable assistance, to PPPs and other projects for urban renewal and development
• JESSICA and JEREMIE are complementary:– JEREMIE can support SMEs in urban areas,– JESSICA can support urban infrastructure projects
and networks, energy efficiency or ICT projects, not relating to access to finance to SMEs.
Regional Policy
EUROPEAN COMMISSIONEN
ENEN
1818
WHAT IS JESSICA ?WHAT IS JESSICA ?
• Under Jessica, MS and MAs have the possibility to allocate and contribute resources from OPs, to:
- Urban Development Funds (UDF),
- Holding Funds (HF)
• Urban Development Funds invest in PPPs or projects included in Integrated Urban Development Plans
(IUDP)
• Holding Funds invest in several UDFs
Regional Policy
EUROPEAN COMMISSIONEN
ENEN
1919
WHY JESSICA? Because …WHY JESSICA? Because …
• Investment needs for sustainable cities and towns are increasing
• Available public funds are scarce-need for private and banking sector contribution
• Existing administrative and technical capacity within Urban authorities often does not correspond to investment needs
• Innovative schemes not aggravating public finance and debt are necessary
• Sustainable urban investments require technical, financial and managerial expertise of IFIs, banks and private sector.
Regional Policy
EUROPEAN COMMISSIONEN
ENEN
2020
JESSICAJESSICA supports projects supports projects
• MAs negotiate and sign funding agreements with selected funds or holding funds (+detailed rules)
• Contributions from OPs to UDFs must be paid at least once in the period 2007-15,
• UDF invest in PPPs or other urban projects, providing them with equity, loans or guarantees
• projects supported by UDF could also receive grant assistance from OPs (e.g. grants + loans),
• Grant assistance from OPs could finance the equity gap of projects
• When paid back to the fund, before or after 2015, must be reinvested in urban projects.
Thank you for your attention !