+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Enabling Hydrogen Embrittlement Modeling of Structural Steels

Enabling Hydrogen Embrittlement Modeling of Structural Steels

Date post: 15-Mar-2022
Category:
Upload: others
View: 7 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
16
Enabling Hydrogen Embrittlement Modeling of Structural Steels Brian Somerday Sandia National Laboratories June 11, 2008 Project ID # PDP11 This presentation does not contain any proprietary, confidential, or otherwise restricted information Sandia is a multiprogram laboratory operated by Sandia Corporation, a Lockheed Martin Company, for the United States Department of Energy under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000
Transcript

Enabling Hydrogen EmbrittlementModeling of Structural Steels

Brian SomerdaySandia National Laboratories

June 11, 2008

Project ID # PDP11This presentation does not contain any proprietary, confidential, or otherwise restricted information

Sandia is a multiprogram laboratory operated by Sandia Corporation, a Lockheed Martin Company, for the United States Department of Energy under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000

Overview

• Project start date Jan. 2007• Project end date Sept. 2015• Percent complete 15%

• Barriers addressed– High Capital Cost and

Hydrogen Embrittlement of Pipelines

– Storage Tank Materials and Costs

• Total project funding (through FY08)– DOE share: $384K

• FY07 Funding: $184K• FY08 Funding: $200K

Budget

• DOE Pipeline Working Group– Sandia National Lab– Oak Ridge National Lab– Savannah River National Lab– CTC– NIST– Industrial gas companies– ASME

Partners

Timeline Barriers & Targets

Objectives

• Enable application of structural integrity models to steel hydrogen pipelines– Models can demonstrate that hydrogen embrittlement can be

accommodated and pipeline safety margins can be quantified

• Enable development of micromechanics models of hydrogen embrittlement in pipeline steels– Micromechanics models are essential for understanding the

fundamentals of hydrogen transport and embrittlement in steels

• Measure cracking kinetics and thresholds of X100 steel under static loading in hydrogen gas pressures from 7 to 140 MPa (FY08 Q1; complete)

• Measure fatigue crack propagation rates of X100 steel in hydrogen gas over the pressure range 7 to 140 MPa (FY08 Q3; in progress)

Milestones

Approach

• Measure properties of pipeline steels in high-pressure H2 gas using fracture mechanics methods– Thresholds for sustained-load cracking– Fatigue crack growth rates under cyclic loading

• Assess suitability of steels by using measured properties as inputs into structural integrity models– Materials are qualified for service if pipeline meets performance

critieria, e.g., number of allowable pressure cycles

• Identify and measure fundamental parameters in mechanistic models of hydrogen embrittlement

Materials testing motivated by design method

• Article KD-10 in ASME BPV Code Section VIII, Div. 3– Applies to H2 pressure vessels and pipelines– Design method identifies two H2-assisted failure modes:

fatigue crack growth and sustained-load cracking• Requires materials data in high-pressure hydrogen gas for

fracture mechanics-based structural integrity models

p

Ri

Ro

at

a/ac

1.0

N/Nc

1.0

0.25

0.5

cycles tocritical crack depth

critical crack depth for crack extensionunder sustained or rising load, ac

0.5 x cyclesto critical crack depth

cycles for0.25 x critical crack depth

Testing of X100 line pipe steel

• Yield strength– 96 ksi (662 MPa) in longitudinal (L) orientation– 114 ksi (787 MPa) in circumferential (C) orientation

L

C

Measurement of sustained-load cracking thresholds

• Specimen loaded to Ko>KTH using bolt while contained in glove box (Ar with ~1 ppm O2)

• Loaded specimen exposed to H2, crack extends after incubation time

• Crack arrests at K=KTH

Load

(P)

Time in H2

Po ∝ Ko

Loading bolt

Load cell

strain gage leads (Excitation and DAQ)

13 mm

PTH ∝ KTH

incubation time=f(environment, Ko)

wedge opening load (WOL)cracking threshold specimen

Results show hydrogen embrittlement in X100 steel

X100 (100 MPa H2 gas)

X100 (air)

H2 gas pressure (kpsi)0 5 10 15 20 25

Stre

ss in

tens

ity fa

ctor

, K (

ksi⋅ i

n1/2 )

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

H2 gas pressure (MPa)0 25 50 75 100 125 150

Stre

ss in

tens

ity fa

ctor

, K (

MP

a⋅m

1/2 )

0

50

100

150

200

250

300KJIc

KTH

X100 SteelWOL specimensC-L orientation25 oC

Measured properties assessed from structural integrity model

• Calculate critical crack depth, ac, for X100 hydrogen pipeline operating at p = 21 MPa pressure– assume axial flaw with infinite length– hoop stress σh = 260 MPa (37% SMYS)– measured KTH = 85 MPa-m1/2 in 21 MPa H2 gas– ac = 0.6 cm (ac/t = 0.45)

p

Ri

Ro=16.3 cm

a

t=1.3 cm a/ac

1.0

N/Nc1.0

cycles tocritical crack depth

critical crack depth for crack extensionunder sustained load, ac

Model shows that pipeline can safely tolerate deep flaw

Incubation time for crack extension depends on Ko and H2 pressure

Procedures for measuring sustained-load cracking thresholds should not prescribe arbitrary test durations

H2 gas pressure (kpsi)0 3 6 9 12 15 18

Incu

batio

n tim

e (h

r)

0

10

20

1400

1600

1800

2000

H2 gas pressure (MPa)0 25 50 75 100

cracking in H2

X100 SteelWOL specimensKo=160 MPa-m1/2

25 oC

Initial stress intensity factor, Ko (ksi⋅in1/2)0 30 60 90 120 150

Incu

batio

n tim

e (h

r)

0

100

200

3600

3800

4000

Initial stress intensity factor, Ko (MPa⋅m1/2)0 30 60 90 120 150

cracking in H2

no cracking in H2

X100 SteelWOL specimens100 MPa H2 gas25 oC

KTH

Crack branching may account for absence of crack extension at low Ko

Initial stress intensity factor, Ko (ksi⋅in1/2)0 30 60 90 120 150

Incu

batio

n tim

e (h

r)

0

100

200

300

3600

3700

3800

3900

4000

Initial stress intensity factor, Ko (MPa⋅m1/2)0 30 60 90 120 150

cracking in H2

no cracking in H2

X100 SteelWOL specimens100 MPa H2 gas25 oC

KTH

SA 372 Gr. J (100 MPa H2)

precrackcrack branch

Issues that compromise measurement of conservative properties must be identified

X100 (100 MPa H2)

precrack

crack branch10 μm

Microscopy evidence provides insight into hydrogen embrittlementX100 in 100 MPa H2 gas:

crack profile

X100 in 21 MPa H2 gas:fracture surface

• Initial evidence suggests transgranular microcracksform in ferrite with limited plasticity– Results provide information for development of

micromechanics models

System for measuring fatigue crack growth rates in H2 gas

• Pressure vessel designed to contain H2 gas up to 20 kpsi (138 MPa)

• Challenges in testing and system design– leak rates at dynamic seals– accurate load measurement– effect of high-pressure H2 gas on

instrumentation• Fatigue crack growth data serve as

inputs to structural integrity models

vessel on mechanical test frame

Future Work

Remainder of FY08• Determine solution for leaks at sliding seals in system for

measuring fatigue crack growth rates in hydrogen gas• Measure fatigue crack growth rates of X100 in hydrogen gas

FY09• Emphasize testing of low-strength steels such as X42 and X52

− Includes base metal and welds− Measure fracture toughness, sustained-load cracking thresholds,

and fatigue crack growth rates in hydrogen gas

Summary

• Completed measurements of cracking thresholds for X100 steel as a function of H2 gas pressure– Structural integrity model shows that pipeline fabricated from X100

could tolerate deep flaws– Testing results demonstrate that procedures must be defined to

ensure conservative properties are measured

• Microscopy evidence suggests that hydrogen embrittlementproceeds by transgranular fracture across the ferrite phase– Such evidence provides important information for the development

of micromechanics models of hydrogen embrittlement


Recommended