+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Endoleaks after F-BEVAR · ENDOLEAKS AFTER F-BEVAR 2% 2% 0% 0% 2% 27% 23% 25% 32% 34% 6% 1% 2% 2%...

Endoleaks after F-BEVAR · ENDOLEAKS AFTER F-BEVAR 2% 2% 0% 0% 2% 27% 23% 25% 32% 34% 6% 1% 2% 2%...

Date post: 12-Aug-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
41
Endoleaks after F-BEVAR How to Assess & Treat? Gustavo S. Oderich, MD Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN
Transcript
Page 1: Endoleaks after F-BEVAR · ENDOLEAKS AFTER F-BEVAR 2% 2% 0% 0% 2% 27% 23% 25% 32% 34% 6% 1% 2% 2% 8% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Dismissal 1 month 6 months 12 months All patients

Endoleaks after F-BEVARHow to Assess & Treat?

Gustavo S. Oderich, MD

Mayo Clinic

Rochester, MN

Page 2: Endoleaks after F-BEVAR · ENDOLEAKS AFTER F-BEVAR 2% 2% 0% 0% 2% 27% 23% 25% 32% 34% 6% 1% 2% 2% 8% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Dismissal 1 month 6 months 12 months All patients

FACULTY DISCLOSURE

Gustavo S. Oderich MD

• Consulting, DSMB, CEC*Cook Medical Inc., WL Gore, Lombardi

• HonorariaWL Gore, Endologix

• Research grants* Cook Medical Inc., WL Gore, Atrium Maquet

* All consulting fees and grants paid to Mayo Clinic

Page 3: Endoleaks after F-BEVAR · ENDOLEAKS AFTER F-BEVAR 2% 2% 0% 0% 2% 27% 23% 25% 32% 34% 6% 1% 2% 2% 8% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Dismissal 1 month 6 months 12 months All patients

Post-procedure 60 months

Post-

procedure

24 months

60 months

33.99 mm

39.60 mm

43.07 mm

33.69 mm

39.29 mm

40.17 mm

Above

endograft

At right renal

artery origin

DISEASE PROGRESSION

Page 4: Endoleaks after F-BEVAR · ENDOLEAKS AFTER F-BEVAR 2% 2% 0% 0% 2% 27% 23% 25% 32% 34% 6% 1% 2% 2% 8% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Dismissal 1 month 6 months 12 months All patients

EVOLVING SELECTION OF LANDING ZONES

Page 5: Endoleaks after F-BEVAR · ENDOLEAKS AFTER F-BEVAR 2% 2% 0% 0% 2% 27% 23% 25% 32% 34% 6% 1% 2% 2% 8% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Dismissal 1 month 6 months 12 months All patients

Surg

eri

es

(%)

100

80

60

40

20

0

20

100

80

60

40

Endole

akra

te

0

MORE VESSELS, LESS LEAKS

O’Callaghan A, et al: J Vasc Surg; 61:908, 2015

Year

2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012

Endoleak

2 Fen

3 Fen + Scallop

4 Fen/Br

Page 6: Endoleaks after F-BEVAR · ENDOLEAKS AFTER F-BEVAR 2% 2% 0% 0% 2% 27% 23% 25% 32% 34% 6% 1% 2% 2% 8% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Dismissal 1 month 6 months 12 months All patients

Compression,

separation

- Migration

- Remodeling

Endoleaks

Infection

Kinks, compression

- Edge kinks

- Dilator injury

Endoleaks

In-stent

stenosis

- Bare-metal

Endoleaks

Infection

Distal edge

stenosis

- Covered

- Self-expandable

Days Months Years

F-BEVAR FAILURE MODES

Page 7: Endoleaks after F-BEVAR · ENDOLEAKS AFTER F-BEVAR 2% 2% 0% 0% 2% 27% 23% 25% 32% 34% 6% 1% 2% 2% 8% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Dismissal 1 month 6 months 12 months All patients

ENDOLEAK CLASSIFICATION

Page 8: Endoleaks after F-BEVAR · ENDOLEAKS AFTER F-BEVAR 2% 2% 0% 0% 2% 27% 23% 25% 32% 34% 6% 1% 2% 2% 8% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Dismissal 1 month 6 months 12 months All patients

Gustavo S. Oderich MD, Mauricio Ribeiro MD PhD, Jan Hofer RN, Jean Wigham RN, Leonardo Reis de Souza MD, Julia Chini, Stephen Cha MS, Thanila A. Macedo MD and Peter Gloviczki MDDivision of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery and Departments of

Radiology, Epidemiology and Biostatistics

Prospective Non Randomized Trial to

Evaluate F-BEVAR of Pararenal and

TAAAs using Supra-Celiac Sealing Zones

Journal of Vascular Surgery 2017WASHINGTON, DC

Page 9: Endoleaks after F-BEVAR · ENDOLEAKS AFTER F-BEVAR 2% 2% 0% 0% 2% 27% 23% 25% 32% 34% 6% 1% 2% 2% 8% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Dismissal 1 month 6 months 12 months All patients

TRIAL DESIGN

• Prospective, non-randomized study

• Cook manufactured F-BEVAR for pararenal and TAAAs

• Imaging follow up:

– CBCT intra-operative

– CTA Dismissal, 1 month, 6 month and yearly

– Duplex US preop, 1 month, 6 month and yearly

– Clinical examination and labs

• Independent imaging review (Vascular CTA lab)

• Independent DSMB adjudication of clinical events

Page 10: Endoleaks after F-BEVAR · ENDOLEAKS AFTER F-BEVAR 2% 2% 0% 0% 2% 27% 23% 25% 32% 34% 6% 1% 2% 2% 8% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Dismissal 1 month 6 months 12 months All patients

ENDOLEAKS AFTER F-BEVAR

2% 2%0% 0%

2%

27%23%

25%

32%34%

6%

1% 2% 2%

8%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

Dismissal 1 month 6 months 12 months All patients

Type I

Type II

Type III

Patients at risk 127 117 89 56 127

127 patients

46% had any

endoleak

Oderich et al. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2017 (in press)

Page 11: Endoleaks after F-BEVAR · ENDOLEAKS AFTER F-BEVAR 2% 2% 0% 0% 2% 27% 23% 25% 32% 34% 6% 1% 2% 2% 8% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Dismissal 1 month 6 months 12 months All patients

Oderich et al. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2017 (in press)

F-BEVAR REINTERVENTIONS

Reintervention Total <30 days >30 days

Aortic 14 (11%) 5 (4%) 9 (7%)

Branch stenosis 4 (3%) 0 4 (3%)

Iliac limb stenosis 2 (2%) 2 (2%) 0

Endoleak 7 (6%) 2 (2%) 2 (2%)

Type IA 2 (2%) 1 (1%) 1 (1%)

Type IC 1 (1%) 0 1 (1%)

Type III 6 (5%) 2 (2%) 4 (4%)

Non-aortic 8 (6%) 6 (5%) 2 (2%)

Access related 4 (3%) 2 (2%) 2 (2%)

Laparotomy 4 (3%) 4 (3%) 0

Total 23 (18%) 11 (9%) 12 (9%)

Page 12: Endoleaks after F-BEVAR · ENDOLEAKS AFTER F-BEVAR 2% 2% 0% 0% 2% 27% 23% 25% 32% 34% 6% 1% 2% 2% 8% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Dismissal 1 month 6 months 12 months All patients

TREATMENT CONSIDERATIONS

• Endoleak mechanism or type?

– Antegrade or attachment related?

– Retrograde?

– Associated device integrity or structural issues

• Sac enlargement?

• Endovascular solution?

– Is there a new achievable sealing zone?

– What are complicating factors imposed by prior FEVAR?

• Open surgical solution?

– Can the patient handle explantation?

– Clamp site? Side branch reconstruction?

Page 13: Endoleaks after F-BEVAR · ENDOLEAKS AFTER F-BEVAR 2% 2% 0% 0% 2% 27% 23% 25% 32% 34% 6% 1% 2% 2% 8% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Dismissal 1 month 6 months 12 months All patients

TYPE IA

ENDOLEAKS…

Page 14: Endoleaks after F-BEVAR · ENDOLEAKS AFTER F-BEVAR 2% 2% 0% 0% 2% 27% 23% 25% 32% 34% 6% 1% 2% 2% 8% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Dismissal 1 month 6 months 12 months All patients

TYPE IA ENDOLEAKProximal TEVAR attachment

Need for brachial

access

Page 15: Endoleaks after F-BEVAR · ENDOLEAKS AFTER F-BEVAR 2% 2% 0% 0% 2% 27% 23% 25% 32% 34% 6% 1% 2% 2% 8% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Dismissal 1 month 6 months 12 months All patients

TYPE IA ENDOLEAKProximal TEVAR attachment

Arch extension with

C-TAG and anchors

Page 16: Endoleaks after F-BEVAR · ENDOLEAKS AFTER F-BEVAR 2% 2% 0% 0% 2% 27% 23% 25% 32% 34% 6% 1% 2% 2% 8% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Dismissal 1 month 6 months 12 months All patients

2009

2011

2012

40-mm

45-mm

54-mm

TYPE IA ENDOLEAKProgression of aortic disease

Reverse Frozen elephant trunt technique

Page 17: Endoleaks after F-BEVAR · ENDOLEAKS AFTER F-BEVAR 2% 2% 0% 0% 2% 27% 23% 25% 32% 34% 6% 1% 2% 2% 8% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Dismissal 1 month 6 months 12 months All patients

TYPE IA ENDOLEAKDevice infolding

Page 18: Endoleaks after F-BEVAR · ENDOLEAKS AFTER F-BEVAR 2% 2% 0% 0% 2% 27% 23% 25% 32% 34% 6% 1% 2% 2% 8% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Dismissal 1 month 6 months 12 months All patients
Page 19: Endoleaks after F-BEVAR · ENDOLEAKS AFTER F-BEVAR 2% 2% 0% 0% 2% 27% 23% 25% 32% 34% 6% 1% 2% 2% 8% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Dismissal 1 month 6 months 12 months All patients
Page 20: Endoleaks after F-BEVAR · ENDOLEAKS AFTER F-BEVAR 2% 2% 0% 0% 2% 27% 23% 25% 32% 34% 6% 1% 2% 2% 8% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Dismissal 1 month 6 months 12 months All patients

TYPE IC

ENDOLEAKS…

Page 21: Endoleaks after F-BEVAR · ENDOLEAKS AFTER F-BEVAR 2% 2% 0% 0% 2% 27% 23% 25% 32% 34% 6% 1% 2% 2% 8% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Dismissal 1 month 6 months 12 months All patients

L renal branch

SMA branch

Contrast outside SMA

distal attachment site

Left renal stent barely

into renal artery

TYPE IC ENDOLEAKSMA and L renal branch stents

Page 22: Endoleaks after F-BEVAR · ENDOLEAKS AFTER F-BEVAR 2% 2% 0% 0% 2% 27% 23% 25% 32% 34% 6% 1% 2% 2% 8% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Dismissal 1 month 6 months 12 months All patients

SMA angiography confirmed

filling of the excluded sac

LRA angiography confirms

filling of the excluded sac

Parallel “sandwich stents”

into SMA and replaced RHA

Page 23: Endoleaks after F-BEVAR · ENDOLEAKS AFTER F-BEVAR 2% 2% 0% 0% 2% 27% 23% 25% 32% 34% 6% 1% 2% 2% 8% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Dismissal 1 month 6 months 12 months All patients

LRA sacrifice with

Amplatz plug

SMA and

Replaced RHA

parallel stents

Page 24: Endoleaks after F-BEVAR · ENDOLEAKS AFTER F-BEVAR 2% 2% 0% 0% 2% 27% 23% 25% 32% 34% 6% 1% 2% 2% 8% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Dismissal 1 month 6 months 12 months All patients

TYPE III

ENDOLEAKS…

Page 25: Endoleaks after F-BEVAR · ENDOLEAKS AFTER F-BEVAR 2% 2% 0% 0% 2% 27% 23% 25% 32% 34% 6% 1% 2% 2% 8% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Dismissal 1 month 6 months 12 months All patients

Interval repair with

extension of fenestrated

and branched endograft

Large type III endoleak

between the outer most

stent from prior repair and

inner stent from extension

fenestrated/branched repair

TYPE III ENDOLEAKThoracic stent overlap

Page 26: Endoleaks after F-BEVAR · ENDOLEAKS AFTER F-BEVAR 2% 2% 0% 0% 2% 27% 23% 25% 32% 34% 6% 1% 2% 2% 8% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Dismissal 1 month 6 months 12 months All patients

Interval spontaneous resolution of Type III endoleak

Spontaneous resolution on first follow up CTA…

Page 27: Endoleaks after F-BEVAR · ENDOLEAKS AFTER F-BEVAR 2% 2% 0% 0% 2% 27% 23% 25% 32% 34% 6% 1% 2% 2% 8% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Dismissal 1 month 6 months 12 months All patients

2011

2013

9-cm

11-cm

TYPE IIIC ENDOLEAKBifurcated component separation

Page 28: Endoleaks after F-BEVAR · ENDOLEAKS AFTER F-BEVAR 2% 2% 0% 0% 2% 27% 23% 25% 32% 34% 6% 1% 2% 2% 8% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Dismissal 1 month 6 months 12 months All patients

2010 2012

TYPE IIIC ENDOLEAKSMA fenestrated-branch stent disconnection

Page 29: Endoleaks after F-BEVAR · ENDOLEAKS AFTER F-BEVAR 2% 2% 0% 0% 2% 27% 23% 25% 32% 34% 6% 1% 2% 2% 8% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Dismissal 1 month 6 months 12 months All patients

IMA angiography

Guide-wire celiac fenestration

Inside aneurysm sac confirmed

type III endoleak

IMA

Large endoleak without

definitive connection to the

SMA or Celiac attachments.

TYPE III/II ENDOLEAKCeliac fenestration and IMA

Page 30: Endoleaks after F-BEVAR · ENDOLEAKS AFTER F-BEVAR 2% 2% 0% 0% 2% 27% 23% 25% 32% 34% 6% 1% 2% 2% 8% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Dismissal 1 month 6 months 12 months All patients

TYPE IIID ENDOLEAKFabric tear (probably from posterior diameter-reducing ties)

Probable fabric

tear

Page 31: Endoleaks after F-BEVAR · ENDOLEAKS AFTER F-BEVAR 2% 2% 0% 0% 2% 27% 23% 25% 32% 34% 6% 1% 2% 2% 8% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Dismissal 1 month 6 months 12 months All patients

TYPE II ENDOLEAKS…

Page 32: Endoleaks after F-BEVAR · ENDOLEAKS AFTER F-BEVAR 2% 2% 0% 0% 2% 27% 23% 25% 32% 34% 6% 1% 2% 2% 8% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Dismissal 1 month 6 months 12 months All patients

TYPE II ENDOLEAKS

Patent IMA or

Hypogastric collaterals

Occluded IMA or

Hypogastric collaterals

Trans-arterial Trans-lumbar

Page 33: Endoleaks after F-BEVAR · ENDOLEAKS AFTER F-BEVAR 2% 2% 0% 0% 2% 27% 23% 25% 32% 34% 6% 1% 2% 2% 8% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Dismissal 1 month 6 months 12 months All patients

TYPE II ENDOLEAKSNeedle assist

Bulls Eye View

Progression View

Page 34: Endoleaks after F-BEVAR · ENDOLEAKS AFTER F-BEVAR 2% 2% 0% 0% 2% 27% 23% 25% 32% 34% 6% 1% 2% 2% 8% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Dismissal 1 month 6 months 12 months All patients

TYPE II ENDOLEAKSRecalcitrant endoleak after multiple prior

interventions

66mm 100mm

Page 35: Endoleaks after F-BEVAR · ENDOLEAKS AFTER F-BEVAR 2% 2% 0% 0% 2% 27% 23% 25% 32% 34% 6% 1% 2% 2% 8% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Dismissal 1 month 6 months 12 months All patients

TYPE II ENDOLEAKSRecalcitrant endoleak after multiple prior

interventions

Date mm Finding Intervention

Preop 62 - FEVAR

Dismissal 62 Type II -

1 month 66 Type II -

12 month 72 Type II Coiling/Onyx

18 month 79 Type II Onyx

24 month 82 Type II Onyx

30 month 82 Type II? -

48 month 95 Type II? Stent realinment

60 month 100 Type II? ?

Page 36: Endoleaks after F-BEVAR · ENDOLEAKS AFTER F-BEVAR 2% 2% 0% 0% 2% 27% 23% 25% 32% 34% 6% 1% 2% 2% 8% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Dismissal 1 month 6 months 12 months All patients
Page 37: Endoleaks after F-BEVAR · ENDOLEAKS AFTER F-BEVAR 2% 2% 0% 0% 2% 27% 23% 25% 32% 34% 6% 1% 2% 2% 8% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Dismissal 1 month 6 months 12 months All patients

HIGH-DEFINITION CONE BEAM CT

* GE Discovery 740 (7 sec Spin)

Page 38: Endoleaks after F-BEVAR · ENDOLEAKS AFTER F-BEVAR 2% 2% 0% 0% 2% 27% 23% 25% 32% 34% 6% 1% 2% 2% 8% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Dismissal 1 month 6 months 12 months All patients

CONCLUSION

• Most common endoleaks are type II and type III from fenestration attachments, which can be treated by embolization and stent reinforcement

• Rates of type Ia endoleak are low when repairs are planned with supra-celiac sealing zones, but likely are more frequent with less extensive repairs

• Options are limited once there is failure of proximal neck after FEVAR (e.g explant, branch, CHIMPS), so it is better to prevent this complication!

Page 39: Endoleaks after F-BEVAR · ENDOLEAKS AFTER F-BEVAR 2% 2% 0% 0% 2% 27% 23% 25% 32% 34% 6% 1% 2% 2% 8% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Dismissal 1 month 6 months 12 months All patients
Page 40: Endoleaks after F-BEVAR · ENDOLEAKS AFTER F-BEVAR 2% 2% 0% 0% 2% 27% 23% 25% 32% 34% 6% 1% 2% 2% 8% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Dismissal 1 month 6 months 12 months All patients

VISCERAL BRANCH DEVICES

PATIENT-SPECIFIC

Fenestrated

Anaconda™

OFF-THE-SHELF

Endolgix

Ventana®Cook

p-Branch®

Cook

t-Branch®

Gore

TAMBE®Cook Zenith®

FDA

APPROVEDCE MARK CE MARK CE MARK

PIVOTAL TRIAL

TERMINATED

PIVOTAL

TRIAL

TRIAL

DESIGN

TRIAL

DESIGN

JuxtarenalPararenal

TAAAPararenal TAAA Juxtarenal Pararenal TAAA

Pararenal

TAAA

JOTEC™

Page 41: Endoleaks after F-BEVAR · ENDOLEAKS AFTER F-BEVAR 2% 2% 0% 0% 2% 27% 23% 25% 32% 34% 6% 1% 2% 2% 8% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Dismissal 1 month 6 months 12 months All patients

Recommended