+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Endovascular treatment for central venous stenosis in … · 1st. 2016, Sept 19 •Angiography...

Endovascular treatment for central venous stenosis in … · 1st. 2016, Sept 19 •Angiography...

Date post: 11-Aug-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 1 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
22
Wei Liang, MD Jiwei Zhang, Peng Wang, Kai Yuan Endovascular treatment for central venous stenosis in hemodialysis patients
Transcript

Wei Liang, MD

Jiwei Zhang, Peng Wang, Kai Yuan

Endovascular treatment for central venous

stenosis in hemodialysis patients

Disclosure

Speaker name: Wei Liang

.................................................................................

I have the following potential conflicts of interest to report:

Consulting

Employment in industry

Stockholder of a healthcare company

Owner of a healthcare company

Other(s)

I do not have any potential conflict of interest×

Central venous stenosis (CVS)

Swollen Arm

Varicose Vein

Skin Ulcer

CVS Incidence: 8.79% in HD

(From 14 Hospitals in China)

BMJ Open 2015, 5

Typical Case

• Female, 60yrs

• R. upper arm AVF 3 yrs

• Varicose vein and edema for

2M in R. upper arm

• SVC filter & R. jugular V

catheter for HD 2M ago

R cephalic V

R Sub-BC

SVC filter

R Jugular V

catheter

1st . 2016, Sept 19• Angiography

• Retrieve SVC filter

• Cross the lesion, PTA+Stent

E-Luminexx 12-80mmPTA 8-40mm, 10-40mm

2nd. 2017, July 31: PTA

Pre- PTA 10-40mm

3rd. 2018, Feb 14: PTA

Pre- PTA 12-40mm

4th. 2018, Apr 4: Stent

Pre- Wallstent 14-90mm

5th. 2018, June 4: PTA

Pre PTA 10-40mm

6th. 2018, July 13: Stent (CS)

Pre- VIABAHN 13-100mm

Our Experience – Renji Hospital

Aug, 2014 – Dec, 2018

31 cases AVF 25, AVG 6

Age 66.1Y (37-86)

Male/Female 14/17

Duration of hemodialysis(M)

39.1±20.3 (6-70)

Past CV Cannulation

23 (74.2%)

Our Experience – Renji Hospital

Clinic Manifestation

Edema 31

Pigment 10

Varicose Vein 31

Skin Ulcer 3

Our Experience – Renji Hospital

Right (17) Left (14)

Ceph-Sub

Sub+BC

Sub BC BC-SVC

Ceph-Sub

Sub+BC

Sub BC BC-SVC

Steno. 1 0 1 2 1 1 2

Occl. 6 1 3 3 1 4 3 2

Total 1 6 2 5 3 1 5 4 4

Ceph: Cephalic Vein, Sub: Subclavian Vein, BC: brachiocephalic Vein

Lesion Location

Our Experience – Renji Hospital

Technique

One Access: Upper arm vein punctureOR Femoral vein puncture

10

Dual Access: Upper arm vein + Femoral vein puncture

21

Our Experience – Renji Hospital

Results

Technique Success 27/31 (87.1%)

Only PTA 12/27 (44.4%)

BMS 15/27 (55.6%)

Length of Stent(mm) 86(60-130)

Symptoms Relief 27/27 (100%)

Complications 0

4 failed cases: 2 involved SVC, 1 Sub+BC long lesion

1 ipsilateral pacemaker

• Medications

Anticoagulant during angioplasty

Antiplatelet (Plavix 75mg/D) for all life

Our Experience – Renji Hospital

Our Experience – Renji Hospital

Follow-up

Period (M) 4-42M

Follow-up rate 25/27(92.6%)

• 3 died with AV access patent

• 1 case Redo with cover stent

Our Experience – Renji Hospital

Primary Patency Secondary Patency

PTA PTA+Stent PTA PTA+Stent

3M 62.5% 91.7%

6M 40.5% 60.8% 71.2% 88.8%

12M 0 0 47.5% 76.7%

24M 0 0 30.5% 65.1%

• Time of re-intervention(M): 5.8 (0.5-12)

Conclusions

• CVS is a critical problem for HD

• Stents (cover stents) may need in difficult cases

• Restenosis is popular after treatment

• Appropriate follow-up & Re-intervention is

important and effective

Better Endo, Better Access


Recommended