Restricted - Confidential Information© GSM Association 2010
Energy Efficiency Benchmarking for Mobile Networks
Confidential
2
Contents
Objectives and Benefits
Methodology
Example Output From Pilot Phase
Our Offer
Next Steps
Confidential
3
Objectives of the Energy Efficiency Initiative
Develop a benchmarking methodology, KPIs and benchmark outputs which allow mobile operators to:
– benchmark themselves externally and internally, and
– reduce energy consumption, emissions and costs
Coordinate with industry and regulatory stakeholders so that the benchmarking methodology is adopted as a global standard by the industry
Ensure that data confidentiality is preserved
Confidential
4
Benefits for Operators
Benchmark networks against peers, develop insight into energy use and target cuts in energy consumption
- A calculation of potential cost and CO2e savings for each network
Participate in a large dataset which leads to improved regressions and statistical significance and more useful results
Demonstrate a commitment to energy and emissions reduction, which will have a positive impact on regulators, investors, customers and other stakeholders
Confidential
5
Contents
Objectives and Benefits
Methodology
Example Output From Pilot Phase
Our Offer
Next Steps
Confidential
6
Methodology
Measure mobile network energy performance by country: – Energy per mobile connection– Energy per unit mobile traffic – Energy per cell site– Energy per unit mobile revenue
Compare networks anonymously
Normalise for variables outside the energy managers’ control for example country, geography and technology factors. This process, which uses multi-variable regression analysis, enables like-for-like comparisons
Confidential
7
Normalisation
Country factors– Population density– Urban / rural population split– Number of cooling degree days– Topology
Market factors– Market share– Traffic, both voice and data– Geographic coverage– Population coverage
Technology factors:– 2G / 3G split– Diesel vs. electricity
consumption
Other– Data accuracy
Larger data set enables normalisation of multiple factors whilst retaining statistical significance
General availability and accuracy of data is important, whether from operator or public domain, e.g. country and market factors
Data that is difficult to gather e.g. age of legacy kit, cooling methods and number of transceivers can be progressively included as it becomes available
Multi-linear regression techniques test intuitive assumptions about variables
Factors must be grouped in a way that makes sense when looking for a linear relationship
EXAMPLE FACTORS IMPLICATIONS
There are many factors that could impact energy efficiency
Confidential
8
Contents
Objectives and Benefits
Methodology
Example Output From Pilot Phase
Our Offer
Next Steps
Confidential
9
Example: Energy Per Connection
Regression analysis captures the impact of technology by using “% connections that are 2G” as one of the factors
Numerous regressions have been tried and a good fit has been obtained from the following factors to explain variations in energy per connection:
– % urban population / % country population covered– Square kilometres covered / connection– % connections that are 2G– % energy from diesel
Other variables, such as cooling degree days, can be added when the data set is larger
Confidential
10
Prior to any “normalisation”, the spread of energy per connection across countries can be quite high
Operator XMobile operations average electricity and diesel usage per connection, 2009
Source: Operator X, GSMA data and analysis
A B C D E F G H I J K L
kWh per connection
Diesel usage
Electricity usage
Country
DISGUISED EXAMPLE
Confidential
11Source: Operator X, GSMA data and analysis
The first level of normalisation is a simple regression against one variable, for example the % of 2G connections
Operator XScatter plot of electrical and diesel energy usage per connection versus % 2G connections, 2009
Mobile operations diesel & electricity usage per connection (kWh / connection)
Country A
Country B
% 2G connections of all mobile connections
Country CCountry D
Country E
DISGUISED EXAMPLE
Confidential
12
However, regressing against several variables at the same time gives a true “normalisation”
Source: Operator X, UN, GSMA data and analysis
Line of best fit:
R2 = 90%
Mobile operations diesel & electricity usage per connection regressed against:- % Mobile operations diesel usage of total diesel and electricity usage- % 2G connections of all mobile connections- Geographical area covered by all MNOs per connection- % urban population / % population covered by all MNOs
Operator XDeviation from line of best fit: average electrical and diesel energy usage per mobile connection, 2009
kWh / connection
AB CD EF G HI JK L
Country
DISGUISED EXAMPLE
Confidential
13
The value comes from assessing the implications with energy managers based on their knowledge of other internal factors
After normalising for these factors, certain countries have high or low energy per connection:
– High: Countries F, B, I, D– Low: Countries E, J, L, H
Various factors could explain the over or under-performance of different countries:– Energy efficiency of network equipment – Network frequency– Network design– Cooling method– Number of cooling degree days – Topology (though analytically not a factor here)– Traffic (though analytically not a factor here)– Data accuracy (to be determined)
Improving the energy efficiency of countries F, B, I and D to the average (post normalisation) will reduce energy costs in those countries by XX% on average
DISGUISED EXAMPLE
Confidential
14
An anonymous comparison against other operators will allow greater insights for energy managers
Line of best fit:
R2 = 90%
Mobile operations diesel & electricity usage per connection regressed against:- % Mobile operations diesel usage of total diesel and electricity usage- % 2G connections of all mobile connections- Geographical area covered by all MNOs per connection- % urban population / % population covered by all MNOs
Operator XDeviation from line of best fit: average electrical and diesel energy usage per mobile connection, 2009
kWh / connection
DISGUISED EXAMPLE
0
Canada
Mexico
South Africa
Source: MNOs, GSMA data and analysis
France Italy Japan
Operator X
Other Operators
Key Regression variables
Confidential
15
Contents
Objectives and Benefits
Methodology
Example Output From Pilot Phase
Our Offer
Next Steps
Confidential
16
Our offer to MNOs
GSMA will:
Collect data from MNOs on electricity and diesel energy use by country for 2009 by cell site, connection, unit traffic and unit revenue
Gather external datasets that might explain variations in energy consumption along technology, country factor and market dimensions
Normalise energy use data to compare like-for-like, using multi-linear regression analyses
Feed back results bilaterally to each MNO participant and refine analyses
Combine data with other participant MNO data and feed back benchmarking results to each MNO participant
Provide each MNO with an estimate of the potential cost savings available as a result of energy reduction
Confidential
17
Contents
Objectives and Benefits
Project Status
Our Offer
Example Output From Pilot Phase
Next Steps
Confidential
18
Next Steps
Agree participation of MNO, including which data can be anonymised and pooled. Start gathering data (and sign confidentiality agreement)
Data required are not onerous. We need, by country for 2009:– Mobile network electrical energy usage and diesel energy usage– Number of physical cell sites, number of mobile connections– Minutes of mobile voice traffic and bytes of mobile data traffic– Mobile revenues
Analyse and benchmark MNO countries as per the example shown for– Energy per mobile connection– Energy per unit mobile traffic – Energy per cell site– Energy per unit mobile revenue
Review the resulting analysis and conclusions with MNO
Re-check regressions using large data set, run regressions with more variables, and run regressions separately for developed and emerging market countries