Date post: | 20-Dec-2014 |
Category: |
Education |
Upload: | nandita-venkatesan |
View: | 425 times |
Download: | 3 times |
Neuqua ValleyEnergy Reduction Challenge 2011
Meet the Problem
• Students were introduced to the problem with letters from ComEd and ARAMARK district 204’s energy management services.
The Problem
$50,380 per month
Neuqua Valley’s Monthly Electric Bill
Understanding the Problem• Process of listing what they already
knew and what needed to be determined.
• Students created a statement to reflect what their role was in the process and what they wanted to accomplish.
Community Partners
• ComEd: Mr. Mark Wizniak- senior Energy Specialist• ARAMARK: Mr Mike Paperella- energy Manager Dist 204• ARAMARK: Mr. Leonard Sharum- building manager• OSRAM Sylvania: Ms Rose
Lenchner-Industrial/Commercial Senior Sales• Neuqua Valley: Mr Mark Kolkman assistant principal-
operations
Energy Audit• Survey conducted throughout the
building• Students using ipads and journals,
documented how electrical energy was being used in lighting and motors
Energy Audit
Tools of the Audit
Kill a watt meter Laser measuring tape
Light meter
Post AuditIdentified areas of energy reduction
or energy inefficiencyStudents organized themselves into
teams of 2 or 3 to attack one identified area.
Students reported back findings and created this presentation.
Identified Possible Opportunities• Classroom lighting• Bathrooms• Weight room and Gym• Computers• Plug Loads• Motors
Classroom Lighting• Light level intensity measurements
indicated that each classroom was overlight• The
Advanced Energy Design Guide for K-12 School Buildings, developed by the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) recommends 30-70 footcandles of illumination
Classroom lighting• Light levels were measured to 60-70 foot-
candles when all the switches in the classroom were on.
Classroom Lighting: Solution• By ONLY turning on one switch, light
levels were still at 50 footcandles.• Energy usage could be reduced by one
third in each classroom
Classroom Lighting• Based on 60 T-8, 28Watt light bulbs
and roughly 110 classrooms.• Operating for 12 hours a day and 177
days in the school year• Projected savings:
131,000 KWhr @$0.10/KWhrSavings of $13,000
Classroom Lighting• Solution: Ad Campaign to educate
staff and students of the savings.– Switch plate stickers, poster
Bathrooms
• Lights are on at least 18 hours/day
• Bathrooms are only occupied a total of 4 hours/day
Current StateLocation #bathrooms #bulbs Kw/bathroom
Aud. Lobby
4 20 0.560
Hallways 10 12 0.336
Commons 2 21 0.588
Gym Hall 2 12 0.336
Total 18 266 7.448
Estimated hours of usage = 18 hours a day = 540 hours a month
Current UsageLocation KWhr/bathroom
Auditorium Lobby 302
Hallways 181Commons 318Gym Hall 181Total 983Total Operating Cost $323.75
Proposed Savings with Motion SensorsLocation KWhr/bathroomAuditorium Lobby 67
Hallways 40Commons 71Gym Hall 40Total 218Total Operating Cost $71.51
Estimated hours of usage = 4 hours a day = 120 hours a month
Return on InvestmentInitial Cost With Labor $6,473Savings per month $252.25# months to cover 25.66 monthsReturn on Investment 2.14 years
Weight Room• Current lighting:
T-12• Proposed
lighting: T-8
0 2 4 6 8 10 120
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
Cost Savings
T12T8
Years
Cum
ulati
ve C
ost
Return on Investment reached at less than 5 years
Gym• Current lighting: HID• Proposed lighting: T-5
HID fixtures in Gym Proposed T5 fixture
0 2 4 6 8 10 120
50000
100000
150000
200000
250000
Cost Savings
HID RetrofitT-5 H.O.
Years
Cum
ulati
ve C
ost
Return on Investment reached in just over 4 years
Computers
• 850 are old CRT type5.2W phantom load141W when on
•250 are new LCD typeNo phantom load89W when on
Currently 1100 computers in use
Current Configuration850 Old Computers 250 New Computers
ON Phantom Load ON(141W x 12hr + 5.2W x 12hrs) x850 + 89W x 10hrs x250
= 1714 KWhr/day x 177 days/school year
303,378 KWhr/year
Total cost at $0.10/KWhr $30,378
Current Computers with Shutdown Software
850 Old Computers Phantom Load
250 New computers
(141W x 10hrs + 5.2W x 14hrs) x850 + 89W x 10hrs x250
=1482 KWhr/day x 177 days /school year
262,314 KWhr/year
Total cost at $0.10/KWhr $26,231
Solution: New Computers with Shutdown Software
1100 New Computers= 89W x 10 hrs x 1100 x 177 days/school year
173,283 KWhr/year
Total cost at $0.10/KWhr $17,328
Total Projected Energy Savings:130,095 KWhr/year
Phantom Loads• Electricity is used even when
electrical device is not in use
Phantom LoadsItem Number of Units
KWhr Used / Year
Cost Per Year
TV 21 4200 551.88
Projector 7 3150 413.91
Printers 39 956 125.57
Fridge 7 5740 754.25
Microwaves 9 900 177.39
LCD computer 21 2100 551.88
Smartboards 2 180 41.06
Dishwasher 1 170 5.58
VCR 1 40 7.88
Freezer 1 790 51.9
Overhead 1 3092 414.33
TV 21 4200 551.88
Projector 7 3150 413.91
Survey of Electrical devices in Building
Total Phantom Load: 21,318 KWhr/year
Total cost @$0.10/KWhr $2,132 /year
Phantom Loads• Out of TV, overhead, VCR and projector, just use one,
and get rid of the rest; projector seems the most reasonable to use
• For fridges, freezers, microwaves, dishwashers, and other appliances, purchase energy-efficient models
• Smart powerstrips• For printers, scanners, and copy machines, buy models
where all are combined into one unit.• Unplug TV, overhead, VCR, projector, computers,
scanners, and copy machines when the school day ends.
Phantom Loads• 30 % energy reduction• Energy Savings of 6,396 KWhr/year• Cost Savings: $639.60
Cafeteria Lighting• About 100 lights total• 87 CFLs• 13 T-8 bulbs
Replace All with LEDs
Conclusion• ROI/Year and initial cost not feasible• Realistically, this solution is not
financially practical• Better to leave the cafeteria as is – CFL lights are the next best thing
CFL LED
The VariableFrequencyDrive
Overview•Summary: The VariableFrequencyDrive, belonging to a class of electric variable speed drives, acts as the brains of a motor that converts electrical power, which is at a fixed voltage and frequency, to variable voltage and frequency
•Purpose: To control the output speed of a motor by consuming only the power that is needed. This reduces energy usage by almost 2/3
VFD
VS
Methods of Measurement
Total Projected Energy Savings:120,971 KWhr/ year
Summary• Total energy savings for all feasible
solutions is 600,000 kwhr per year• Once ROI year is reached…• Savings is $60,000 per year OR• $5,000 per month
Summary
Energy Equivalence Calculation Courtesy of SIEMENS http://siemens.greentouchscreen.com/CO2eCalculator/