+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Energy Performance Simulation of Hotel in Greece using the ... · Papadaki Maria-Eleni Papasifaki...

Energy Performance Simulation of Hotel in Greece using the ... · Papadaki Maria-Eleni Papasifaki...

Date post: 22-Jan-2021
Category:
Upload: others
View: 1 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
1
The importance of Tourism 2012 Energy Performance Simulaon of Hotel in Greece using the EnergyPlus soſtware with the aim of upgrading M.E. Papadaki 1 and A. Papasifaki 1 , S.P. Pieri 1 , I. Tzouvadakis 1 1.Department of Civil Engineering, Naonal Technical University of Athens, 10682, Athens, Greece To improve energy performance of exisng hotel • by implementaon of retrofit intervenons supporng energy saving • by applicaon of renewable energy technology supporng energy producon t Introducon The contribuon of tourism to GDP in Greece reaches 16.4% (SETE, 2012) with hotel sector contribung 45.3% of tourist GDP (ΙΟΒΕ). However, hotels can have adverse environmental effects due to their excessive energy consumpon. The annual average total energy consumpon in hotels is 273 kWh/m2 in Greece, the second highest among all categories of buildings (Santamouris et al 1996). Iniaves have been taken for sustainable development . In this direcon hoteliers implement effecve innovaons and retrofing systems which can have environmental and financial benefits. Case Study Hotel building 3* category • constructed in 1980 • 4 floors with total area of 3900 m², 93 rooms included • elongated shape in North-South axis with North façade • electricity used for lighng, electrical equipment and air-condioning for air cooling only • located in Heraklion, Crete of Greece Fig. 1: Daily Dry Temperature in Heraklion in DView soſtware Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 Materials and Methods Assessment tools used : • Google SketchUp & Legacy Open Studio plugin - division in 27 thermal zones (T.O.T.E.E. Protocols) • EnergyPlus Imported parameters: - Building materials (T.O.T.E.E. Protocols) - Internal gains (ASHRAE, IES), zones airflows, HVAC - Schedules (according to hotel management info) Fig. 2: 3D Model of the Hotel in SketchUp Materials and Methods Proposed scenarios: Night Vevnlaon - decrease the value of day venlaon - increase the value of night venlaon Low-emissivity Glazing - external layer: Low-e 3mm, G-Value: 0.837→0.63 - air cavity filling → Argon 12mm External Insulaon - external layer → expanded polisteryne plates - exterior walls U-value: 1.66 → 0.47 - exterior roof U-value: 1.94 → 0.49 Photovoltaic system - interconnected PV system -net metering- 94 PV monocrystalline silicon panels of 245 Wa inclinaon 30° Cost viability • research for technology systems that implement the above scenarios • esmaon of payback period for each one Results !!! Energy Consumpon = Ideal Electrical Energy Consumpon Required Base Case - Total Energy Consumpon: 36.29 kWh/m²/year Fig. 3: Monthly Energy Consumpon - 5% /year reducon in Energy Consumpon - Excepted payback period: 19 years (EBMS-Window Control System) Low-e Glazing (Scenario 2) - 3.36% /year reducon in Energy Consumpon - Excepted payback period: 25 years Night Venlaon (Scenario 1) Fig. 4: Daily Mean Temperature in West Rooms of 1 st Floor thermal zone Fig. 5: Hourly Mean Temperature in West Rooms of 2 nd Floor thermal zone, highest radiaon day: 12/07 (Dview soſtware) Results Conclusions External Insulaon (Scenario 3) - 18.2% /year retducon in Energy Consumpon - Excepted payback period: 26 years PV System (Scenario 4) - Annual producon 8.7 kWh/m² 23.7%/year of the Total Energy Consumpon - Excepted payback period: 16 years All Intervenons simultaneously (Scenario1&2&3&4) - 49.9%/year reducon in Total Energy Consumpon Fig. 6: Mean Daily Temperature in West Rooms of 3 rd Floor thermal zone - Excepted payback period: 21 years Table : Monthly Energy Consumpon Fig. 7: Annual Energy Consumpon • Most efficient soluon: Scenario 4 (23.7% energy saving) • Cost viable soluon: Scenario 4 (16 years payback period) • Most environment friendly soluon: the simultaneous implementaon of all the proposed intervenons (approximately 50% energy saving) References 1.SETE, Associaon of Greek Tourism Enterprises, The importance of Tourism 2012 2.ΙΟΒΕ, Foundaon for Economic and Industrial Research 3. M. Santamouris , C.A. Balaras , E. Dascalaki , A. Argiriou, A. Gaglia. Energy conservaon and retrofing potenal in Hellenic hotels. Energy and Buildings 24 (1996) 65-75 4.T.O.T.E.E., Technical Instrucons of the Technical Chamber of Greece 20701-1/2010 and 20701-2/2010 5. ASHRAE, American Society of Heang, Refrigerang and Air-Condioning Engineers, ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 55, ASHRAE Fundamentals 2009 6. IES, Illuminang Engineering Society of North America, Lighng Handbook: Reference & Applicaon, 8th Edion Acknowledgement We are grateful to the building owner and facility manager for providing data. We would also like to thank Fanis Psomas for his advice and support. Personal Informaon Papadaki Maria-Eleni Papasifaki Alkyoni [email protected] [email protected] +30 6942588537 +30 6973538136 Objecves 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 kWh/m² Months air-cooling electrical equipment &lighng Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct 28 29 30 31 32 33 1:00 3:00 5:00 7:00 9:00 11:00 13:00 15:00 17:00 19:00 21:00 23:00 ° C Hours Base Case Scenario 2 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 04/01 04/11 04/21 05/01 05/11 05/21 05/31 06/10 06/20 06/30 07/10 07/20 07/30 08/09 08/19 08/29 09/08 09/18 09/28 10/08 o C Days Base Case Scenario 1 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Base Case Scenario 1 Scenario 1&2 Scenario 1&2&3 Scenario 1&2&3&4 kWh/m ² 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 04/01 04/15 04/29 05/13 05/27 06/10 06/24 07/08 07/22 08/05 08/19 09/02 09/16 09/30 10/14 o C Days Base Case Scenario 3 Months Total January Before 0 0 0 0 0 1.43 3.01 6.81 9.16 8.75 5.46 1.67 36.29 0 0 0 0 0 1.32 1.94 4.75 6.85 6.68 4.00 1.25 26.79 0.51 0.45 0.67 0.49 0.41 0.72 0.81 0.88 0.93 0.95 0.89 0.90 8.61 18.18 Aſter February March April May June July August September October November December Required Energy Consumpon (kWh/m2) Generated Energy by PV System (kWh/m2) Final Energy Consumpon Required (kWh/m2)
Transcript
Page 1: Energy Performance Simulation of Hotel in Greece using the ... · Papadaki Maria-Eleni Papasifaki Alkyoni mariaelenpap@gmail.com papasifaki@gmail.com +30 6942588537 +30 6973538136

The importance of Tourism 2012

Energy Performance Simulation of Hotel in Greece using the EnergyPlus software with the aim of upgrading

M.E. Papadaki1 and A. Papasifaki1, S.P. Pieri1, I. Tzouvadakis1

1.Department of Civil Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 10682, Athens, Greece

To improve energy performance of existing hotel • by implementation of retrofit interventions supporting energy saving • by application of renewable energy technology supporting energy production

tIntroduction

The contribution of tourism to GDP in Greece reaches 16.4% (SETE, 2012) with hotel sector contributing 45.3% of tourist GDP (ΙΟΒΕ). However, hotels can have adverse environmental effects due to their excessive energy consumption. The annual average total energy consumption in hotels is 273 kWh/m2 in Greece, the second highest among all categories of buildings (Santamouris et al 1996).Initiatives have been taken for sustainable development . In this direction hoteliers implement effective innovations and retrofitting systems which can have environmental and financial benefits.

Case StudyHotel building 3* category • constructed in 1980• 4 floors with total area of 3900 m², 93 rooms included• elongated shape in North-South axis with North façade• electricity used for lighting, electrical equipment and air-conditioning for air cooling only• located in Heraklion, Crete of Greece

Fig. 1: Daily Dry Temperature in Heraklion in DView softwareJan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

68

10

12

14

16

18

2022

24

2628

30

32

Materials and MethodsAssessment tools used :• Google SketchUp & Legacy Open Studio plugin - division in 27 thermal zones (T.O.T.E.E. Protocols)

• EnergyPlus Imported parameters: - Building materials (T.O.T.E.E. Protocols) - Internal gains (ASHRAE, IES), zones airflows, HVAC - Schedules (according to hotel management info)

Fig. 2:3D Model ofthe Hotel inSketchUp

Materials and Methods Proposed scenarios: • Night Vevntilation - decrease the value of day ventilation - increase the value of night ventilation • Low-emissivity Glazing - external layer: Low-e 3mm, G-Value: 0.837→0.63 - air cavity filling → Argon 12mm • External Insulation - external layer → expanded polisteryne plates - exterior walls U-value: 1.66 → 0.47 - exterior roof U-value: 1.94 → 0.49 • Photovoltaic system - interconnected PV system -net metering- 94 PV monocrystalline silicon panels of 245 Watt inclination 30°

Cost viability • research for technology systems that implement the above scenarios • estimation of payback period for each one

Results

!!! Energy Consumption = Ideal Electrical Energy Consumption Required

Base Case - Total Energy Consumption: 36.29 kWh/m²/year

Fig. 3: Monthly Energy Consumption

- 5% /year reduction in Energy Consumption - Excepted payback period: 19 years (EBMS-Window Control System)

Low-e Glazing (Scenario 2)

- 3.36% /year reduction in Energy Consumption - Excepted payback period: 25 years

Night Ventilation (Scenario 1)

Fig. 4: Daily Mean Temperature in West Rooms of 1st Floor thermal zone

Fig. 5: Hourly Mean Temperature in West Rooms of 2nd Floor thermal zone, highest radiation day: 12/07 (Dview software)

Results

Conclusions

External Insulation (Scenario 3)

- 18.2% /year retduction in Energy Consumption - Excepted payback period: 26 years

PV System (Scenario 4) - Annual production 8.7 kWh/m² → 23.7%/year of the Total Energy Consumption - Excepted payback period: 16 years

All Interventions simultaneously (Scenario1&2&3&4) - 49.9%/year reduction in Total Energy Consumption

Fig. 6: Mean Daily Temperature in West Rooms of 3rd Floor thermal zone

- Excepted payback period: 21 years

Table : Monthly Energy Consumption

Fig. 7: Annual Energy Consumption

• Most efficient solution: Scenario 4 (23.7% energy saving)• Cost viable solution: Scenario 4 (16 years payback period)• Most environment friendly solution: the simultaneous implementation of all the proposed interventions (approximately 50% energy saving)

References1.SETE, Association of Greek Tourism Enterprises, The importance of Tourism 20122.ΙΟΒΕ, Foundation for Economic and Industrial Research3. M. Santamouris , C.A. Balaras , E. Dascalaki , A. Argiriou, A. Gaglia. Energy conservation and retrofitting potential in Hellenic hotels. Energy and Buildings 24 (1996) 65-754.T.O.T.E.E., Technical Instructions of the Technical Chamber of Greece 20701-1/2010 and 20701-2/20105. ASHRAE, American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 55, ASHRAE Fundamentals 20096. IES, Illuminating Engineering Society of North America, Lighting Handbook: Reference & Application, 8th Edition

AcknowledgementWe are grateful to the building owner and facility manager for providing data. We would also like to thank Fanis Psomas for his advice and support.

Personal Information Papadaki Maria-Eleni Papasifaki Alkyoni [email protected] [email protected] +30 6942588537 +30 6973538136

Objectives

September

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

kWh/

Months

air-coolingelectricalequipment&lighting

Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct

28

29

30

31

32

33

1:0

0

3:0

0

5:0

0

7:00

9:00

11:

00

13:0

0

15:

00

17:

00

19:0

0

21:0

0

23:

00

° C

Hours

Base Case

Scenario 2

17

19

21

23

25

27

29

31

04/

01 0

4/11

04/

21 0

5/01

05/

11 0

5/21

05/

31 0

6/10

06/

20 0

6/30

07/

10 0

7/20

07/

30 0

8/09

08/

19 0

8/29

09/

08 0

9/18

09/

28 1

0/08

o C

Days

Base CaseScenario 1

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Base Case Scenario 1 Scenario1&2

Scenario1&2&3

Scenario1&2&3&4

kWh/

17192123252729313335

04/

01

04/

15

04/

29

05/

13

05/

27

06/

10

06/

24

07/

08

07/

22

08/

05

08/

19

09/

02

09/

16

09/

30

10/

14

o C

Days

Base CaseScenario 3

Months

Total

January

Before

0

0

0

0

0

1.43

3.01

6.81

9.16

8.75

5.46

1.67

36.29

0

0

0

0

0

1.32

1.94

4.75

6.85

6.68

4.00

1.25

26.79

0.51

0.45

0.67

0.49

0.41

0.72

0.81

0.88

0.93

0.95

0.89

0.90

8.61 18.18

After

February

March

April

May

June

July

August

September

October

November

December

Required EnergyConsumption

(kWh/m2)

Generated Energyby PV System

(kWh/m2)

Final EnergyConsumption

Required(kWh/m2)

Recommended