+ All Categories
Home > Health & Medicine > Energy sources in urology

Energy sources in urology

Date post: 22-Jan-2018
Category:
Upload: shubham-lavania
View: 193 times
Download: 3 times
Share this document with a friend
18
Energy Sources in Urology -Dr. Shubham Lavania 30/06/2017 “HEAT CURES WHEN EVERYTHING ELSE FAILS”- Hippocrates Tissue Dissection and Cauterization Intracorporeal Lithotripters ESWL
Transcript
Page 1: Energy sources in urology

Energy Sources in Urology

-Dr. Shubham Lavania

30/06/2017

“HEAT CURES WHEN EVERYTHING ELSE FAILS”- Hippocrates

Tissue Dissection and CauterizationIntracorporeal LithotriptersESWL

Page 2: Energy sources in urology

• Electrosurgery ??Classification -Type of Generator Used:A. Simple generator: mono/ Bipolar cauteryB. Advanced Bipolar System:

I. LigasureII. PK systemIII. Enseal

C. UltrasonicD. Integrated US & ABSE. Argon Beam coagulatorF. LasersG. Others: radiofrequency, microwave, Cryo

Page 3: Energy sources in urology

Mono polar: •Circuit•100 W of power to the tissue at voltages ranging from 100 to 5000 volts•Cut, Coagulate, blend•Fulgration , dessiccation

Bipolar:Circuit

Safety: 1. Patient pad placement2. Demodulated current (250-2000KHz)3. Direct application4. Direct coupling5. Insulation failure6. Capacitative coupling

Page 4: Energy sources in urology

Ligasure:-

• Combines pressure and energy

• Uses higer current & low voltage

• Vs upto 7mm

Gyrus PK tissue management sysytem:-

• Vapour pulse coagulation

Enseal:-

• Patented blade & smart electrode technology

Page 5: Energy sources in urology

Physics of US:

2types: Low power: CUSA

High power(55.5 kHz): Harmonic– Working

– Advantage

Integrated US and ABG: Thunderbeat

Argon beam Coagulation: uses radiofrequency electrical energy.

• Properties of Argon

• Non contact, monopolar electrothermalhemostases.

• Use/ drawback

Page 6: Energy sources in urology

Radiofrequency ablation: probe+ radiofrequency generator= >100⁰C

Use in tumor ablation

Microwave ablation: ultra high speed (2450MHz) alternating field current.

Cryotherapy: rapid cooling of cell and thawing.

Limited uses

Page 7: Energy sources in urology

Lasers• “light amplification by stimulated emission of

electromagnetic radiation.”

• Each wave exists as a bundle of energy

• Properties :– Monochromatic

– Coherent

– Directionality

• Pulsed or continous

• The power of the laser is equal to the energy over time

• Light-Tissue Interaction-

Page 8: Energy sources in urology

Types of LasersNeodymium:Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet:

– wavelength of 1064 nm

– Penetration- 1 cm

Potassium Titanyl Phosphate– wavelength to 532 nm

Holmium:YAG– 2140-nm pulsed laser

– Ts pene-0.5mm

Thulium:YAG– 2000 nm

– Diode laser

Page 9: Energy sources in urology

Intracorporeal Lithotripters

Page 10: Energy sources in urology
Page 11: Energy sources in urology

Extracorporeal Shock wave Lithotripsy

Physical Principles

• Shock wave focusing-sufficient strength only at the target (F2)

• Generator type:

1. Electro hydrolic

2. Electro megnetic

3. peizoelectric

Page 12: Energy sources in urology
Page 13: Energy sources in urology

Imaging Systems

1. Fluoroscopy

2. Ultrasound

3. Combined

Anesthesia

• discomfort experienced~energy density & size of F2

• Narcotic, sedative-hypnotics

• EMLA cream

Page 14: Energy sources in urology

•shock wave profile•Mechanics of stone fragmentation1. Spall fracture2. Squeezing-splitting or

circumferential compression3. Shear stress4. Superfocusing5. Cavitation6. Dynamic fracture process

Page 15: Energy sources in urology

Bioeffects: Clinical Studies• Acute extra renal damage: Liver, spleen pancreas,

cardiac, muscles.• Acute Renal Injury: hematuria, subcapsular

hematoma• Chronic Renal Injury: systemic blood pressure,

↓renal function, ↑ rate of stone recurrence, and the induction of brushite stone disease

Risk Factors for Shock Wave Lithotripsy• Age Obesity• Coagulopathies Thrombocytopenia• Diabetes mellitus Coronary heart disease• Preexisting hypertension

Page 16: Energy sources in urology

Aggravating Factors• Number of shocks• Period of shock wave administration: Shorter period

increases damage• Accelerating voltage: Higher voltage increases damage• Type of shock wave generator: First- versus

second/third-generation devices• Kidney size: Juvenile versus adult• Preexisting renal impairmentMitigating Factors• Pretreatment with 100 to 500 shocks at low energy

level to reduce lesion size• Treatment at a slow rate of shock wave delivery (≤60

shocks/min)

Page 17: Energy sources in urology

AUA Recommendations• Clinicians should inform patients that SWL is the

procedure with the least morbidity and lowest complication rate. S R; Grade B

• Routine stenting should not be performed in patients undergoing SWL. S R;Grade B

• In symptomatic patients with a total non-lower pole renal stone burden ≤ 20 mm, clinicians may offer SWL or URS. SR grade B

• Clinicians should offer SWL or URS to patients with symptomatic ≤ 10 mm lower pole renal stones

• In pediatric patients with a total renal stone burden ≤20mm, clinicians may offer SWL or URS as first-line therapy. MR; Grade C

Page 18: Energy sources in urology

Recommended