Click To Edit Master Title Style
Engaging Building Occupants: How to Reduce Plug Load Energy Use
Rois Langner, NREL Technical Lead, Plug & Process Load Technical Solutions Team May 10, 2016
Engaging Building Occupants: How to Reduce Plug Load Energy Use
2
- Presentations:
- Christine Wu, Sustainability Program Manager at the U.S. General Services Administration
- Moira Hafer, Sustainability Specialist at Stanford University
- Discussion and Q & A
Join the Better Buildings Alliance!
3
Join the BBA PPL Tech Team
Plug Load Control: Real-World Testing and Application Christine Wu, GSA
4PYK�0SEH�'SRXVSP�� 6IEP�;SVPH�8IWXMRK�ERH�%TTPMGEXMSR� 9�7��+IRIVEP�7IVZMGIW�%HQMRMWXVEXMSR��`��'LVMWXMRI�;Y��+VIIR�4VSZMRK�+VSYRH�4VSKVEQ
Ű8,)�+3:)621)28ŭ7�0%2(036(ű
������EWWIXW
ŵ 3[RIH��������EWWIXW
���1�WUYEVI�JIIX
ŵ 3[RIH�����1�WUYEVI�JIIX
����QMPPMSR�JIHIVEP�IQTPS]IIW
����1�ERRYEP�IRIVK]�GSWXW
*)()6%0�1%2(%8)7�7)8�8,)�4%')
)\IGYXMZI�3VHIV������������
��� �ERRYEP�VIHYGXMSR�MR�)9-�XLVSYKL�������SZIV������PIZIPW
+7%�6IWTSRWI�
)RIVK]�-RHITIRHIRGI�ERH�7IGYVMX]�%GX������
�� �VIHYGXMSR�MR�IRIVK]�YWI�MRXIRWMX]��)9- �F]������SZIV� �����PIZIPW
+7%�6IWTSRWI� ����� �)9-�VIHYGXMSR�)3*=������
+7%�FYMPHMRKW�EVI� �����QSVI� IJJMGMIRX�XLER� X]TMGEP�9�7��SJJMGI� FYMPHMRKW�
���� �)9-�VIHYGXMSR�EW�SJ�*=�����5���
��.ERYEV]�������+7%�%ZIVEKI�)9-�!������O&89�+7*�]V��EW�VITSVXIH�TIV�PIKMWPEXMZI�QERHEXI�� 'SQQIVGMEP�SJJMGI�EZIVEKI�)9-�!������O&89�7*�]V�������'&)'7��IME�KSZ�
+VIIR�4VSZMRK�+VSYRH�PIZIVEKIW�+7%ŭW�VIEP�IWXEXI�TSVXJSPMS�XS� IZEPYEXI�MRRSZEXMZI�WYWXEMREFPI�FYMPHMRK�XIGLRSPSKMIW�
,3;�(3)7�+4+�;36/#
-HIRXMJ]�TVSQMWMRK�XIGLRSPSKMIW�EX�XLI�IHKI�SJ�GSQQIVGMEPM^EXMSR
4MPSX�XIGLRSPSK]�MRWXEPPEXMSRW�[MXLMR�+7%ŭW�VIEP�IWXEXI�TSVXJSPMS
4EVXRIV�[MXL�(ITEVXQIRX�SJ�)RIVK]�REXMSREP�PEFSVEXSVMIW�XS�SFNIGXMZIP]� IZEPYEXI�VIEP�[SVPH�TIVJSVQERGI
6IGSQQIRH�XIGLRSPSKMIW�[MXL�FVSEH�HITPS]QIRX�TSXIRXMEP
)2)6+=�1%2%+)1)28 �����Ū7SGMEPP]�(VMZIR�,:%'��ų �����Ū%HZERGIH�4S[IV�7XVMTW�� �����Ū;MVIPIWW�7IRWSV�2IX[SVOW�� 4EWWMZI�8LIVQEP�7XSVEKI�4PEXJSVQ
4VIHMGXMZI�,:%'�3TXMQM^EXMSR :EVMEFPI�7TIIH�'LMPPIV�4PERX�'SRXVSP 'MVGYMX�0IZIP�)RIVK]�1SRMXSVMRK
0-+,8-2+
�����Ū0)(W�[MXL�-RXIKVEXIH�'SRXVSPW�� �����Ū;MVIPIWW�0MKLXMRK�'SRXVSPW�ų �����Ū-RXIKVEXIH�(E]PMKLXMRK�7]WXIQW�� �����Ū3GGYTERX�6IWTSRWMZI�0MKLXMRK��� 0)(�6ITPEGIQIRX�0EQT�JSV�'*0W 2IX[SVOIH�0MKLXMRK 8�0)(�6IXVSJMX�JSV�*PYSVIWGIRX�0YQMREMVIW
&9-0(-2+�)2:)034) �����Ū)PIGXVSGLVSQMG�;MRHS[W�JSV�043)W�� �����Ū%TTPMIH�7SPEV�'SRXVSP�6IXVSJMX�*MPQW�� �����Ū'LVSQSKIRMG�;MRHS[W �����Ū:EGYYQ�-RWYPEXIH�4ERIPW �����Ū,MKL�6�:EPYI�;MRHS[�4ERIPW��ų )PIGXVSGLVSQMG�;MRHS[W�[MXL�(]REQMG�'SRXVSPW 0S[�)QMWWMZMX]�;MRHS[�*MPQ
(E]PMKLX�6IHMVIGXMRK�;MRHS[�*MPQ
32�7-8)�43;)6��6)2);%&0)7 �����Ū4LSXSZSPXEMG�8LIVQEP�,]FVMH�7]WXIQ
�����Ū;SSH�4IPPIX�*MVIH�&MSQEWW�&SMPIVW �����Ū4:�+YMHERGI �����Ū4LSXSZSPXEMG�7]WXIQW� ,SRI]GSQF�7SPEV�8LIVQEP�'SPPIGXSV &YMPHMRK�-RXIKVEXIH�4:W�JSV�;MRHS[W
1SVI�MRJSVQEXMSR�EZEMPEFPI�EX�KWE�KSZ�+4+
��� ���1:�78%897���EW�SJ�%TVMP����� ��������� ��������� �!�'SQTPIXIH�Ū�� ���'SRXMRYMRK�)ZEPYEXMSR�Ū�� ���(ITPS]IH�4IRHMRK�(ITPS]QIRXŪ� ��� �����-HIRXMJMIH�JSV�&VSEH�(ITPS]QIRX�ũ��� ���ų�(ITPS]IH�XLVSYKL�)74'�ũ��
;%8)6 �����Ū;MVIPIWW�1SMWXYVI�7IRWMRK�-VVMKEXMSR�7]WXIQ
�����Ū'EXEP]WX�&EWIH�2SR�'LIQMGEP�;EXIV�8VIEXQIRX�� �����Ū;IEXLIV�7XEXMSR�JSV�-VVMKEXMSR�'SRXVSP��
,:%'
�����Ū;MVIPIWW�4RIYQEXMG�8LIVQSWXEX��ų �����Ū'SRHIRWMRK�&SMPIVW��9THEXIH��ų �����Ū1YPXMWXEKIH�-RHMVIGX�)ZETSVEXMZI�'SSPIV �����Ū7]RGLVSRSYW�ERH�'SKKIH�*ER�&IPXW�� �����Ū:EVMEFPI�7TIIH�1EKPIZ�'LMPPIV��ų �����Ū:EVMEFPI�6IJVMKIVERX�*PS[
,MKL�)JJMGMIRG]�689 :EVMEFPI�7TIIH�7GVI[�'LMPPIV 'SRXMRYSYW�'SQFYWXMSR�'SRXVSP�7]WXIQ
-RXIPPMKIRX�:EPZIW�JSV�,]HVSRMG�7]WXIQW 7QEVX�7GVYFFIVW�JSV�,:%'�0SEH�6IHYGXMSR
+VIIR�4VSZMRK�+VSYRH�����������
+4+�409+�03%(�'328630�):%09%8-32
ƒ 3TTSVXYRMX]�������� �SJ�FYMPHMRK�IPIGXVMGMX]�GSRWYQTXMSR�KSIW� XS�TPYK�PSEHW�
ƒ ;LEX�;I�(MH���-R�������26)0�XIWXIH�XLVII�TPYK�PSEH�VIHYGXMSR� WXVEXIKMIW�EX�[SVOWXEXMSRW���OMXGLIRW��ERH�TVMRX�VSSQW�MR�IMKLX� JIHIVEP�SJJMGI�FYMPHMRKW�XLVSYKLSYX�+7%ŭW�1MH�%XPERXMG�6IKMSR� ��&EWIPMRI�JSV�[SVOWXEXMSRW�MRGPYHI�-8�TSPMG]�XS�TIVJSVQ�HEMP]�GSQTYXIV�WLYXHS[R�
ƒ 8IGLRSPSK]���8IWXIH�WXVEXIKMIW�MRGPYHIH��
E� WGLIHYPI�FEWIH�GSRXVSP�JVSQ��E��T
F� PSEH�WIRWMRK�FEWIH�SR�QSRMXSV�HVE[
G� GSQFMRIH�WGLIHYPI��PSEH�WIRWMRK
+4+�409+�03%(�'328630�):%09%8-32
)RIVK]�6IHYGXMSR�JSV�8IWXIH�'SRXVSP�7XVEXIKMIW
��
��
��
��
�
��
��
��
�� ��
��� ��� ��� � �SJ�XSXEP�TPYK�PSEH ����
+4+�409+�03%(�'328630�):%09%8-32
0IWWSRW�0IEVRIH 7GLIHYPI�FEWIH
Ɣ %GGSYRX�JSV�VIEP�[SVPH�ZEVMEFMPMX]�MR�[SVO�WGLIHYPIW�ERH�LEFMXW��Ű8MKLXű�WGLIHYPMRK� QE]�WIIQ�XS�WEZI�QSVI�IRIVK]��FYX�QE]�VIWYPX�MR�QSVI�HMWWEXMWJEGXMSR�ERH�LMKLIV� VEXIW�SJ�QERYEP�SZIVVMHIW�SV�HMWEFPMRK�SJ�HIZMGIW�
Ɣ %GGSYRX�JSV�[EVQ�YT�XMQIW��I�K���TVMRXIVW��OMXGLIR�IUYMTQIRX
0SEH�WIRWMRK
Ɣ %X�[SVOWXEXMSRW��EGGSYRX�JSV�W[IIT�XMQIW��M�I���XLI�EQSYRX�SJ�XMQI�VIUYMVIH�XS� WIRWI�E�QEWXIV�PSEH ��-J�XLI�HIZMGI�W[IITW�SRGI�TIV�QMRYXI��MW�E�SRI�QMRYXI�PEK� MR�WPEZI�[EOI�YT�XMQI�EGGITXEFPI#
Ɣ 1IXIV�QEWXIV�HIZMGI�HVE[�WXEXIW��I�K���ŰMR�YWI�ű�ŰWXERHF]�ű�ERH�ŰSJJű�HVE[W�JSV� QSRMXSVW �TVMSV�XS�MQTPIQIRXEXMSR�MR�SVHIV�XS�EZSMH�WIRHMRK�JEYPX]�GSQQERHW�XS� WPEZI�HIZMGIW�
+4+�409+�03%(�'328630�):%09%8-32
0IWWSRW�0IEVRIH 8IRERX�IRKEKIQIRX
Ɣ 8IRERXW�QYWX�FI�ORS[PIHKIEFPI�SJ�
Ŷ ,S[�XLI�WXVEXIK]�[MPP�WEZI�IRIVK]
Ŷ ,S[�MRHMZMHYEP�EGXMSRW�QE]�LIPT�XS�WEZI�IRIVK]
Ŷ ,S[�XS�SZIVVMHI��HMWEFPI��ERH�SV�VIWIX�XLI�TPYK�WXVMT
Ɣ 7IPIGX�E�WXVEXIK]�XLEX�HSIW�RSX�VIUYMVI�XIRERXW�XS�TVMSVMXM^I�IRIVK]�WEZMRKW�SZIV� TIVWSREP�GSRZIRMIRGI�
+IRIVEP
Ɣ 1MRMQM^I�GSQTPI\MX]�JSV�FSXL�MRWXEPPEXMSR�ERH�STIVEXMSRW
Ɣ )QTPS]�WXVEXIKMIW�XLEX�QMRMQM^I�MQTEGX�SR�XIRERXWŭ�HEMP]�STIVEXMSRW
%47�2%8-32%0�()403=1)28
�������XMQIV�FEWIH�EHZERGIH�TS[IV�WXVMTW�HITPS]IH�MR����JIHIVEP�FYMPHMRKW�MR���� GMXMIW�EGVSWW�XLI�97�
%47�2%8-32%0�()403=1)28
;L]�XLMW�HIZMGI#
Ɣ 1ERYEP�SR���%YXS�SJJ
Ɣ -QQIHMEXI�[EOI�YT�WMKREP
Ɣ 9RPMOIP]�XS�FI�TIVQERIRXP]�HMWEFPIH
Ɣ ��]IEV�TE]FEGO
Ɣ 4PYK��4PE]��)EW]�MRWXEPPEXMSR��RS�GSQQMWWMSRMRK
Ɣ 2S�-8�GSQTSRIRX
0IWWSRW�0IEVRIH
Ɣ 8VEMR�MRWXEPPIVW�SR�WXERHEVH�EP[E]W�SR���EYXS�SJJ�HIZMGIW
Ɣ -WWYI�XIRERX�VIQMRHIVW�XS�XYVR�SJJ�%47�[LIR�XLI]�PIEZI�XLIMV�[SVOWXEXMSR
%47�2%8-32%0�()403=1)28
%47�2%8-32%0�()403=1)28
����1�PMJIG]GPI�IRIVK]�GSWX�EZSMHERGI
������1;L�ERRYEP�IRIVK]�WEZMRKW
��]IEV�TE]FEGO
��������������WJ�WEZIH�JSV�SJJMGI�FYMPHMRKW�
4SXIRXMEP�MQTEGX�����1�EZSMHIH�PMJIXMQI�IRIVK]�GSWXW��MJ� HMWXVMFYXIH�JSV�IZIV]�IQTPS]II�MR�+7%�FYMPHMRKW�
7*8SSP�KSZ
409+�03%(�',)'/0-78
䙘 )WXEFPMWL�E�TPYK�PSEH�GLEQTMSR
䙘 (IZIPST�E�FYWMRIWW�GEWI�XS�EHHVIWW�TPYK�PSEHW
䙘 &IRGLQEVO�XLI�IJJMGMIRG]�SJ�GYVVIRX�IUYMTQIRX�ERH�STIVEXMSRW
䙘 -HIRXMJ]�SGGYTERXWŭ�XVYI�RIIHW
䙘 1IIX�RIIHW�IJJMGMIRXP]
䙘 8YVR�YRYWIH�IUYMTQIRX�SJJ
䙘 -RWXMXYXMSREPM^I�TPYK�PSEH�QIEWYVIW�XLVSYKL�TVSGYVIQIRX�HIGMWMSRW�ERH�TSPMG]�TVSKVEQW
䙘 4VSQSXI�SGGYTERX�E[EVIRIWW
䙘 %HHVIWW�YRMUYI�QMWGIPPERISYW�TPYK�PSEHW
䙘 %HHVIWW�TPYK�PSEHW�MR�FYMPHMRK�HIWMKR�VIXVSJMXW
8LERO�=SY�
'LVMWXMRI�;YGLVMWXMRI�[Y$KWE�KSZ
KWE�KSZ�+4+�
Stanford Equipment Inventory & Plug Load Reduction Project Moira Hafer, Stanford University
Stanford Equipment Inventory & Plug Load Reduction Programs
Moira Hafer, Sustainability Specialist
Office of Sustainability Stanford University
Better Buildings Alliance Summit, May 10, 2016
• Goals:
1. Quantify campus plug load energy consumption and understand its composition
2. Identify viable plug load energy reduction opportunities
3. Collect data that supports Office of Sustainability’s partners
Stanford Equipment Inventory Overview
2
• Comprehensive 260-building equipment inventory
• Types of equipment included: • Standard office equipment • Standard lab equipment • Common IT equipment • Kitchen & break room equipment • Gym equipment • Other • EH&S hazards • Water fixtures • Occupancy data
• Attributes collected for each type of equipment to provide necessary details for estimating energy consumption
• Inventory covers 93% of campus square footage
Scope
3
Data Collection Tool
4
Interns used web application developed by LBRE IT to collect inventory data
Results (A) – Campus-Wide Context
5
Total Equipment Count 204,000
Total Energy Consumption
(kWh/yr) 77.3 million
Total annual cost $9 million
Plug Load as % of Total Campus Electricity Use
34%
Desk Lamp, 17%
Personal Computer,
16%
LCD Monitor, 11%
Phone, 6%
Personal Printer, 3%
Microwave, 3%
Common
Refrigerator, 3%
Fan, 3%
Server, 3%
Speakers, 2%
TV / LCD Screen, 2%
Other, 28%
Equipment Count
Results (B) - Energy Consumption by Equipment Type
6
0
2,000,000
4,000,000
6,000,000
8,000,000
10,000,000
12,000,000
14,000,000
16,000,000
18,000,000
20,000,000
Serv
erLa
b Fr
eeze
rIn
cuba
tor
Com
mon
Ref
riger
ator
Wat
er B
ath
Lab
Refri
gera
tor
Pers
onal
Com
pute
rUP
SDi
shw
ashe
rAu
tocla
ve/S
teril
izer
Netw
ork S
witc
hLC
D M
onito
rPe
rson
al Re
frige
rato
rEl
ectri
c Ket
tleTo
aste
rM
icrow
ave
Micr
osco
peCe
ntrif
uge
Pers
onal
Prin
ter
Spac
e Hea
ter
Smal
l Net
wor
ked
Prin
ter
TV /
LCD
Scre
enHo
t Pla
te Fan
Larg
e Net
work
ed C
opy/
Prin
ter
Ice M
achi
neSh
ake
Tabl
eCo
ffee
Mak
erPh
one
Wat
er C
oole
r/He
ater
Desk
Lam
pSp
eake
rsVe
ndin
g M
achi
neCR
T Mon
itor
Over
head
Pro
ject
orTr
eadm
illDr
yer
Cabl
e Bo
xAi
r Con
ditio
ning
Uni
tEx
tern
al H
ard
Driv
eSu
bwoo
fer
Ster
eoSc
anne
rVo
rtex
Mixe
rW
ashi
ng M
achi
neGr
ow La
mps
/ Pl
ug Li
ghtin
gW
ater
Coo
ler/
Filte
rFa
x Mac
hine
Dock
ing
Stat
ion
VCR
Ellip
tical
Mac
hine
DVD
Play
erSt
atio
nary
Bik
eW
hirlp
ool
Plot
ter
Ener
gy C
onsu
mpt
ion
(kW
h/yr
)
Key:
IT Equipment
Lab Equipment
Office Building Equipment
7
Results (C) - Energy Consumption by Equipment Type, cont’d
Server, 24%
Lab Freezer, 14%
Incubator, 9%
Common Refrigerator, 7%
Water Bath, 6%
Lab Refrigerator, 5%
Personal Computer, 5%
UPS, 3%
Dishwasher, 3%
Autoclave/Steril izer, 2%
Network Switch, 2%
LCD Monitor, 2%
Personal Refrigerator, 2%
Other, 16%
Equipment Energy Consumption
Results (D) – Energy Consumption by Building Type
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
8.00
9.00
10.00
Ener
gy U
se In
tens
ity
(kW
h/Sq
Ft/Y
r)
Average Plug Load Energy Use Intensity by Building Type
Plug Load Energy Savings Programs Summary
9
Potential Savings: $2.3 million
Program Total
Potential Savings
Average ROI (years)
% Plug Load Reduction
% Total Electricity Reduction
Equipment Retrofits $183,000 0.5 2% 1%
Space Heating $23,700 2.4 0.3% 0.1%
Sustainable IT $682,000 2.5 8% 3%
Green Labs $1,457,000 3.4 16% 5%
Total $2.3 M 2.2 26% 9%
Field Test of Basic Energy Efficiency Measures
10
ROI = 0.2
ROI = 0.9
ROI = 0.6
ROI = 0.5
ROI = 0.7
ROI = 4.9
ROI = 0.2
ROI = 0.4
ROI = 0.5 ROI = 0.6
ROI = 1.2
ROI = 5.8 ROI = 6.3
ROI = 53.7 0
100
200
300
400
500
600
Timers on
commercial
coffee makers
Timers on water
coolers
Timers on hot
water
dispensers
Timers on cable
boxes
Timers on
standard coffee
makers
Timers on
single-cup
coffee makers
Replace
incandescent
light bulbs with
LEDs in task
lamps
Unit
Ener
gy S
avin
gs (
kWh/
yr)
Estimated Unit Energy Savings
Measured Unit Energy Savings
1. Data from pilots showed significant savings from installing programmable timers on: � Coffee makers � Water coolers & hot water dispensers � Cable boxes
2. Direct Install program developed for timers to complement existing voluntary Cardinal Green Office Program
3. Feedback positive from standard office occupants but challenging in 24/7 buildings 4. Persistence was a concern but follow-up checks showed only 5% of water cooler
timers removed and no coffee maker timers removed 5. Considering similar program for advanced power strips, especially new technologies
that connect to a mobile app (pilot will run June – August 2016)
Direct Install Program for Timers
11
Program Expected
Annual Savings
Average ROI
% Plug Load Reduction
Equipment Retrofits
$183,000 0.5 years 1%
Timer Program Materials
12
Space Heater Minimization
13
Program Expected
Annual Savings
Average ROI
% Plug Load Reduction
Space Heater Minimization
$23,700 2.4 years 0.1%
1. Follow-up study conducted in the 20 buildings with the highest number of space heaters to determine most effective energy-saving strategy � Results showed only 6% of people use space heaters
excessively � 45 space heaters automatically removed
2. Space heater swap as part of fall energy savings campaign � 50 individuals volunteered to turn in space heaters, 25
actually did so (and were very excited!) � 1.5 year ROI to provide fleece jacket as incentive
1. Power management: � Partnerships with department-level IT groups are critical, although it can be a difficult ask if
IT groups are focused on other projects � Familiariarity with computers and unique use cases in their departments � Can set appropriate and consistent sleep schedules throughout the department
� Occupants generally OK with pushing out new settings (similar to security, patches, etc.), unless they need remote access
2. Server virtualization and relocation – move servers out of closets!
Sustainable IT
14
Program Expected
Annual Savings
Average ROI
% Plug Load Reduction
Sustainable IT $682,000 2.5 3%
Incorporate plug load measures into existing Green Labs Program: 1. Equipment timers on heating blocks, water
baths, etc. 2. Rebates for energy efficient ULT freezers 3. Free room-temperature storage sample kits 4. Chill-up ULT freezers - part of fall energy
savings campaign 5. Outreach is biggest challenge!
Green Labs
15
Program Expected Annual Savings (kWh)*
Average ROI % Plug
Load Reduction
Green Labs 1,457,000 3.4 years 5%
Conclusion
16
� Summary: � Equipment inventory data helped narrowed focus by revealing biggest savings
opportunities (i.e. labs and IT equipment, including computers) � “Low-hanging fruit” still valuable to go after � With 4 new programs developed, approximately $66,000 saved in electricity
costs in one year � Ongoing Challenges: � Outreach � Boots on the ground to get the work done � Persistence is still a concern, although it was not shown to be a problem with
timers on select equipment � Occupants tend to receive programs well, except in unique environments/use
cases � Next Steps: � Widespread active monitoring and control technologies could have a big
impact
Thank you!