53
English Linguistics 1
English Linguistics 1
Session 3 2
3.3 Lexical fields
also: semantic field, G Wortfeld, lexikalisches Feld
items in the vocabulary / lexicon which cover a coherent area / field,a conceptual domain
the whole lexicon of a language is split up into lexical fields
27.10.2010
Session 3 3
e.g. domains of 'meals', 'fruit', 'vegetables', 'cooking', 'drinking', 'places for eating and drinking' etc.
mealsbreakfast, lunch, brunch, dinner, ... = onomasiological approach (starts from concept, asks for all possible signs)
general idea:the meaning of a member of the field can only be describedby referring to the other members
27.10.2010
Session 3 4
E big, large, great, tallG großsuggestion: the meaning space is divided as with the parts of a mosaic
27.10.2010
tall
largegreat
big
groß
Session 3 5
lexical field of 'asking': ask, inquire, interrogate, question, wonder ...
verbs of 'moving': walk, march, pace, amble, stroll, sneak, stagger ...
colour adjectives: ...
university teachers: professor, reader, lecturer, fellow (BE) (AE)
27.10.2010
Session 3 6
procedure for describing lexical fields:
componential analysis or semantic feature analysisthe meaning of a word is described as a bundle of semantic features
girl [+ HUMAN, - ADULT, + FEMALE]boy [+ HUMAN, - ADULT, … ]woman [ … ]man [ ]cow [ ]
27.10.2010
Session 3 7
matrix with a finite number of semantic features description of the whole vocabulary / lexicon of a language
implies - existence of clear boundaries between individual items
27.10.2010
Session 3 8
Try to complete the semantic feature matrix for the following verbs (lexical field of cooking) by indicating whether the verb can be used to signal the semantic feature in brackets or not, e.g.: you can boil sth. in [water], therefore '+', you do not toast sth. in the [oven], therefore ' − '+ … yes− … no± … both may apply
27.10.2010
Session 3 9
[water] [fat/oil] [oven] [cooker] [degree]
cook ± ± ± ± ±boil + +
simmer + −fry +
roast +toast − −bake − −
27.10.2010
Fig. Lexical field verbs of cooking
Session 3 10
[water] [fat/oil] [oven] [cooker] [degree]
cook ± ± ± ± ±boil + +
simmer + −fry +
roast +toast − −bake − −
27.10.2010
Fig. Lexical field verbs of cooking
Session 3 11
conclusion:
- psychological reality of lexical fields is accepted by modern linguists
- improbable, however, that systematic semantic features define the boundaries between individual items
27.10.2010
remember the more recent idea of
- prototypes / prototypical features in our minds
- boundaries often fuzzy (exs.: chair, vase; see above)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Are there other principles structuring the lexicon?
Session 3 13
3.4. Lexical relations / meaning relations
3.4.1 Synonymy
expression of the same meaning by means of different wordse.g. deep, profound
The incident made a impression on me.
27.10.2010
deepprofound
Session 3 14
ex. commence – begin, finish – end, close – shut, adult – grown-up
is there anything as absolute synonymy?test:exchangeable in all contexts?
27.10.2010
This river is very deep / *profound. ? He commenced to cry.…
absolute synonymy ….
Session 3 16
many 'so-called synonyms'interchangeable only in some contexts= total synonymy –
to die – to pass away – to kick the bucketwhat is the difference?
27.10.2010
Session 4 17
3.4.2 Relationships of contrast
– –
– –
03.11.2010
dead single sleep have
1. complementarity
relationship of contradictionthe denial of one term is the assertion of the other,
no 'room' in between
Session 4 19
– – – –
03.11.2010
old good love genius
2. antonymy, antonymsdifference to 1.?
Jumbo is a small elephant.
Session 4 21
– – – – –
03.11.2010
teacher buy over behind parent
Session 3 22
3. converseness, conversesexpress the same meaning with a reversal of the order of participants
Harris was Chomsky's teacher. Chomsky …
The cat is behind the car.
27.10.2010
Session 4 23
– – – – –
03.11.2010
arrive come have learn know
Session 3 24
4. directional opposites express some kind of direction (also metaphorically)
you must have (own) sth. before you,you have to learn sth. in order to ,you can only forget what you
27.10.2010
Session 3 25
3.4.3 Hierarchical relationships
27.10.2010
fish
Session 3 26
3.4.3 Hierarchical relationships
27.10.2010
fish
Session 3 27
= hyponymy:relationship of inclusion,superordinate term (hypernym) includes a set of (co)hyponyms
27.10.2010
Session 3 2827.10.2010
lips, teeth, tongue
face
chineyesnosemouth
Session 3 29
= meronymy:part-whole relationship (meronym – holonym)
the holonym cannot be used for the meronym! (≠ hyponymy)
27.10.2010
Session 3 30
3.5 Lexical ambiguitya word allows more than one meaningan old friend (1) friend who is aged
(2) friend who one has known for a long time
he lost his head (1) metaphorical(2) literal
27.10.2010
Session 3 31
two types of ambiguity:polysemy the various meanings are associatively related to one another
mouth – (1) opening through which so. takes food
(2) part of a river which empties into a lake, sea
27.10.2010
Session 3 32
homonymy
bark (1) outer covering of wood(2) sound uttered by a dog
swallow (1) to go down through the throat(2) small bird
27.10.2010
Session 3 33
difference between polysemy and homonymy:(a) differentiation based on etymology p. – etymologically the same word, additional meanings via meaning transferh. – two originally differently sounding words coalesce in the course of their developmentlie – OE licgan 'to be in a flat position'
– OE leogan 'to tell sth. that is not true'
27.10.2010
two approaches may lead to divergent results!
(b) based on psychological relatedness
p. – associative connection by the native speaker
h. – no associative connection
lie – no link between two meanings, therefore lie1 and lie2
Session 3 35
find the different meanings of box (n.) and ask yourself whether you can explain the meanings by associative connections or not
27.10.2010
Session 3 36
box(1) container for putting things(2) square on a page(3) (telephone) box(4) (witness) box(5) (royal) box(6) (to get a) box (on the ears)(7) box (hedge)
27.10.2010
Session 3 37
problematic cases pupil young student
area in the middle of the eye
G Schloss lockcastle, palace
27.10.2010
E pupil
native speaker probably would assume– very different in meaning– therefore homonyms
G Schlosssee above
Session 3 39
homographs: identical in spelling
homophones: identical in sound regardless of spelling
27.10.2010
Session 3 40
3.6 Metaphor and metonymy
3.6.1 Metaphor
"a good metaphor implies an intuitive perception of the similarities of dissimilars" (Aristotle, Poetics)similarity at least in one characteristic or feature
27.10.2010
Session 3 41
in traditional terminologytwo concepts (tenor and vehicle) are linked (tenor need not be explicit)
An idea hit him.physical impact intellectual process
hit (vehicle) idea (tenor)also: a striking idea, the impact of an ideafrequent characteristic :
27.10.2010
Session 4 42
literature, rhetoric – focus on the 'ingenious' metaphorthe evil empire (president Reagan)everyday use:metaphors are an important structuring principle, we conceptualize one conceptual/mental domain in terms of another
source domain – target domain
strength: whole domain may be made use of
03.11.2010
Session 4 4303.11.2010
metaphor: mapping across domains
Session 4 44
+Love is +Our relationship has hit a dead-end street. Look how far we've come. It's been a long, bumpy road. We can't turn back now. We're at a crossroads. We may have to go our separate ways. The relationship isn't going anywhere. We're spinning our wheels. Our relationship is off the track. The marriage is on the rocks. We may have to bail out of this relationship.
03.11.2010
Session 4 45
transfer of knowledge about …to the concept …
body metaphorsfoot of a hill ...
affection is warmth to greet someone warmly / coldly
03.11.2010
Session 4 46
3.6.2 Metonymyrelationship of contiguity within a conceptual frameThe pen is mightier than the sword. (Edward Bulwer-Lytton)
'the one who can use the pen ...'
03.11.2010
Session 4 47
the primary function of metonymy is referential
helps to avoid too many and too specific terms
03.11.2010
Session 4 4803.11.2010
metonymy: mapping within a domain
Session 4 49
two basic types:
–part for the whole– the whole for the part= synecdoche in traditional rhetoric
container …the kettle's boiling, to drink a bottle
03.11.2010
Session 4 50
producer … he bought a Picasso
03.11.2010
Weeping woman
Session 4 51
object attributea man of the bench (i.e. a judge)
material …
a glass
03.11.2010
Session 4 52
his tongue was sharp (speech)
The decision of the White House The Pentagon decided ... Washington is insensitive ...
place …
03.11.2010
Session 3 5327.10.2010
