Date post: | 18-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | giles-harris |
View: | 216 times |
Download: | 0 times |
ENGR 107: Engineering ENGR 107: Engineering FundamentalsFundamentals
Lecture 7:
The Engineering Design Process:
Making Design Decisions Using Tradeoff Analyses
C. Schaefer
September 29, 2003
September 29, 2003 Egnineering Fundamentals 107 2
StuffStuffReview Project 1Yacht design handoutsYacht diagram:
– http://www.cnn.com/interactive/sailing/yacht.diagram/
Lecture
September 29, 2003 Egnineering Fundamentals 107 3
Project 2 Begins!!Project 2 Begins!!
For each Team, all functional groups shall provide cost ROM’s, Bills of Material, and a list of required tools to the Systems Engineering Group and to me by next Monday.
Systems Engineering group: preliminary schedule and budget due next Wednesday.
Design and Manufacturing Groups: begin conceptual and preliminary design of your respective systems.
Handout $$ and radios on Wednesday.
September 29, 2003 Egnineering Fundamentals 107 4
Engineering DecisionsEngineering Decisions Engineering decision – selecting a specific
solution to a design problem from a set of alternative solutions
Trade-off analysis – an analysis technique in which the performance of various design alternatives are evaluated by varying different design parameters within a design space defined by parameter boundaries or design constraints.
Payoff function – a mathematical model that relates system performance to various design parameters that the designer can control.
September 29, 2003 Egnineering Fundamentals 107 5
Analyze Potential SolutionsAnalyze Potential Solutions
Narrow the ideas generated during the brainstorming phase to several realistic alternatives.
Analytical techniques to narrow choice:– Estimation (“back of the envelope” calculations).– Common sense.– Economic analysis.– Engineering analysis.– Computer analysis.
September 29, 2003 Egnineering Fundamentals 107 6
Using Models in the Decision Using Models in the Decision Making ProcessMaking Process
Mathematical models.Computer models.
– CAD (computer aided design)– Simulink
Scale models.– Wind tunnel models– Mockups
Diagrams or graphs.– Free body diagrams
Math models oftenimplemented ascomputer models.
September 29, 2003 Egnineering Fundamentals 107 7
Model FeaturesModel Features Should represent the dynamics of the system being
represented. Good fidelity: simple to understand and manipulate but
good enough to generate believable results. Should address the most important design parameters.
Ignore higher order terms. Should be repeatable. Should be of modest complexity: complexity often a
function of time and budget constraints on design process. Easily modified.
September 29, 2003 Egnineering Fundamentals 107 8
Mathematical ModelsMathematical Models Uncovers relations between the various aspects of
the problem that may not be apparent in verbal descriptions.
Enables comparisons of many possible solutions. Illustrates cause-and-effect relationships. Defines the type of data required to solve the
problem. Can be used for prediction and forecasting. Aids in identifying areas of risk and uncertainty.
September 29, 2003 Egnineering Fundamentals 107 9
Mathematical Model Example:Mathematical Model Example:Yacht Rating Measurement Yacht Rating Measurement
FormulaFormula
68.230124
253
D
SALSAL
September 29, 2003 Egnineering Fundamentals 107 10
Payoff Function:Payoff Function:Length = Length = f f (Sail Area, Displacement)(Sail Area, Displacement)
3 3031
72.110
D
SA
SAL
September 29, 2003 Egnineering Fundamentals 107 11
Excel Spreadsheet SolutionExcel Spreadsheet Solution
Sail Area (square inches) 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 7 7.5 8300 43.0 43.9 44.7 45.5 46.1 46.8 47.3 47.9 48.4350 40.6 41.5 42.3 43.0 43.7 44.3 44.9 45.4 45.9400 38.5 39.4 40.2 40.9 41.6 42.2 42.7 43.2 43.7450 36.7 37.6 38.4 39.1 39.7 40.3 40.8 41.3 41.8500 35.2 36.0 36.7 37.4 38.0 38.6 39.2 39.7 40.1550 33.7 34.5 35.3 35.9 36.6 37.1 37.7 38.1 38.6600 32.4 33.2 34.0 34.6 35.2 35.8 36.3 36.8 37.2650 31.3 32.0 32.8 33.4 34.0 34.5 35.0 35.5 36.0700 30.2 31.0 31.6 32.3 32.9 33.4 33.9 34.4 34.8750 29.2 30.0 30.6 31.2 31.8 32.3 32.8 33.3 33.7800 28.3 29.0 29.7 30.3 30.8 31.4 31.8 32.3 32.7850 27.4 28.1 28.8 29.4 29.9 30.4 30.9 31.4 31.8900 26.6 27.3 28.0 28.6 29.1 29.6 30.1 30.5 30.9
Displacement (in pounds)
Yacht Length (in inches)
September 29, 2003 Egnineering Fundamentals 107 12
Parametric AnalysisParametric Analysis
Length vs. Sail Area (Displacement Constant)
25.0
30.0
35.0
40.0
45.0
50.0
200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
Sail Area (square inches)
Ya
ch
t L
en
gth
(in
ch
es
)
4
4.5
5
5.5
6
6.5
7
7.5
8
September 29, 2003 Egnineering Fundamentals 107 13
Parametric AnalysisParametric AnalysisLength vs. Sail Area (Displacement Constant)
25.0
30.0
35.0
40.0
45.0
50.0
200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
Sail Area (square inches)
Ya
ch
t L
en
gth
(in
ch
es
)
4
4.5
5
5.5
6
6.5
7
7.5
8
Length Constraint = 36 inches
Valid Design Space
Invalid Design Space
Invalid Design Space
Invalid Design Space
September 29, 2003 Egnineering Fundamentals 107 14
Parametric AnalysisParametric AnalysisLength vs. Sail Area (Displacement Constant)
25.0
30.0
35.0
40.0
45.0
50.0
200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
Sail Area (square inches)
Ya
ch
t L
en
gth
(in
ch
es
)
4
4.5
5
5.5
6
6.5
7
7.5
8
Valid Design Space
Invalid Design Space
September 29, 2003 Egnineering Fundamentals 107 15
Payoff Function:Payoff Function:Sail Area = Sail Area = f f (Length, Displacement)(Length, Displacement)
2
3 3031
72.110
D
LL
SA
September 29, 2003 Egnineering Fundamentals 107 16
Excel Spreadsheet SolutionExcel Spreadsheet Solution
Length (inches) 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 7 7.5 825 1,014 1,065 1,112 1,155 1,196 1,235 1,271 1,305 1,338 26 942 990 1,035 1,076 1,115 1,151 1,185 1,218 1,249 27 877 922 964 1,003 1,039 1,074 1,106 1,137 1,167 28 816 859 899 935 970 1,003 1,034 1,063 1,091 29 761 801 838 873 906 937 966 994 1,020 30 709 747 783 816 847 876 904 930 955 31 662 698 731 762 792 819 846 870 894 32 618 652 684 713 741 767 792 815 838 33 578 610 639 667 693 718 742 764 785 34 540 570 598 625 649 673 695 716 736 35 505 534 560 585 608 631 652 672 691 36 473 500 525 548 570 591 611 630 648
Sail Area (square inches)
Displacement (in pounds)
September 29, 2003 Egnineering Fundamentals 107 17
Parametric AnalysisParametric AnalysisSail Area vs. Yacht Length (Constant Displacement)
400
500
600
700
800
900
1,000
1,100
1,200
1,300
1,400
24 26 28 30 32 34 36
Yacht Length (inches)
Sa
il A
rea
(s
qu
are
in
ch
es
)
4
4.5
5
5.5
6
6.5
7
7.5
8
September 29, 2003 Egnineering Fundamentals 107 18
Payoff Function:Payoff Function:Displacement = Displacement = ff (Sail Area, Length) (Sail Area, Length)
30
)(316.332
3
SAL
SAL
D
September 29, 2003 Egnineering Fundamentals 107 19
Excel Spreadsheet SolutionExcel Spreadsheet Solution
Sail Area (square inches) 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36300 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6350 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.9 2.1400 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.8450 1.1 1.3 1.5 1.8 2.0 2.3 2.7 3.1 3.6500 1.4 1.6 1.9 2.2 2.5 2.9 3.4 3.9 4.5550 1.7 2.0 2.3 2.7 3.1 3.6 4.1 4.8 5.5600 2.0 2.4 2.8 3.2 3.7 4.3 5.0 5.8 6.7650 2.4 2.8 3.3 3.8 4.4 5.2 6.0 6.9 8.0700 2.8 3.3 3.9 4.5 5.2 6.1 7.1 8.2 9.5750 3.3 3.9 4.5 5.3 6.1 7.1 8.3 9.6 11.2800 3.8 4.5 5.2 6.1 7.1 8.3 9.7 11.2 13.0850 4.4 5.1 6.0 7.0 8.2 9.6 11.2 13.0 15.1900 5.0 5.9 6.9 8.1 9.4 11.0 12.8 15.0 17.4
Displacement (in pounds)
Length (in inches)
September 29, 2003 Egnineering Fundamentals 107 20
Parametric AnalysisParametric AnalysisDisplacement vs. Sail Area (Length Constant)
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
14.0
16.0
18.0
250 350 450 550 650 750 850 950
Sail Area (square inches)
Dis
pla
ce
me
nt
(po
un
ds
)
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
September 29, 2003 Egnineering Fundamentals 107 21
How Important are the Criteria in the Decision Process?
Working Criteria
Points Avail. #1 #2 #3
Cost 20 10 15 18Prod. Difficulty 15 8 12 14Size, Weight, Strength
5 5 4 4
Appearance 10 7 6 8
Convenience 5 3 4 4
Safety 10 8 7 8
Legal 5 4 4 4
Reliability 15 7 9 11
Recyclability 5 4 3 4
Appeal 10 7 8 9
TOTAL 100 63 72 84