Enhanced Gas Recovery and CO2Storage in Coal Bed Methane
Reservoirs: Optimized Injected Gas p jComposition for Mature Basins
of Various Coal Rankof Various Coal RankSPE 139723 SPE 139723
Karine Schepers and Anne Oudinot , Advanced Resources International, Inc. Nino Ripepi, Virginia Center for Coal and Energy Research
ObjectivesObjectives
• Identify key parameters driving ECBM and y y p gsequestration processes in deep unminable coal seams.
• Better understand cleat permeability changes in response to injected gas composition during ECBM process, by coal rank.process, by coal rank.
• Optimize injected gas composition to maintain injectivity while sequestering carbon dioxide.
SPE 139723 SPE 139723 2
OutlinesOutlines
• Objectivesj• Key reservoir parameters driving CBM and CO2
sequestration• Cleat permeability changes during ECBM• Optimizing enhanced gas recovery while sequestering
carbon dioxidecarbon dioxide• Summary and Conclusions
SPE 139723 SPE 139723 3
Gas Storage vs Coal RankGas Storage vs. Coal Rank
)
nt (s
cf/t)
ent (
cm/g
)
Coal rank
as C
onte
n
Gas
Con
te
Ga G
SPE 139723 SPE 139723 4
Cleat Permeability vs. Coal Ranky
• Higher the coal rank, the lower the cleat permeability (C C R vs pressure)permeability (Cp, Cm, Rk vs. pressure)
• Low rank coals: – high moisture content, high matrix porosity hence high g g p y g
pore compressibility: maximum loss of fracture permeability
– Early stage coalification, lower matrix compressibility: minimum fracture permeability improvementminimum fracture permeability improvement
(mD
)rm
eabi
lity
SPE 139723 SPE 139723 5
a) Low Rank Coals b) Medium Rank Coals c) High Rank Coals
Pressure (psia) Pressure (psia) Pressure (psia)
Per
Most Commercial CBM Projects M di R k C lare Medium Rank Coals
• High Rank Coal: high gas content but low injectivityg g g j y• Low Rank Coal: low gas content but high injectivity• Good compromise are medium rank coals with average
gas content and initial permeability
CPU dPipeline Termination Point
CPU and Telemetry Station
CO2 Line Heater
Flow Control Valve
Tracer Injection
SECARB Appalachian SECARB Appalachian ––COCO22 Pilot in Pratt coalPilot in Pratt coal
WellheadPressure and Temperature Sensors
NETL’s Perfluorocarbon Tracer Trailer
jPoint
SWP SWP –– COCO22 Injection in Fruitland coalInjection in Fruitland coalSPE 139723 SPE 139723 6
Cleat Permeability during CO2-ECBMCleat Permeability during CO2 ECBM
40
45 Preferential adsorption of
20
25
30
35
onte
nt, m
3/to
nne
Methaneonte
nt (m
3 /m3 )
InjectionCO2: high storage capacity
0
5
10
15
2 000 4 000 6 000 8 000 10 000 12 000 14 000 16 000
Gas
Co Methane
Carbon DioxideNitrogen
Gas
Co
Preferential adsorption 3.5
4
4.5
5
D
CH4 CO2 N2
D)
- 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000
Pressure, kPaPressure (kPa)
of CO2 induces coal swelling resulting in an injectivity loss
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
Perm
eabi
lity,
mD
Start
rmea
bilit
y (m
Injectionj y
SPE 139723 SPE 139723 7
0
0.5
1
0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000
Pressure, kPaPressure (kPa)
Pe
Cleat Permeability during N2-ECBMCleat Permeability during N2 ECBMLower adsorptivity of N2 :40
45
- N2 stays in fractures while CH4is stripped out of matrix sites
- Rapid N2 breakthrough20
25
30
35
onte
nt, m
3/to
nne
Methanenten
t (m
3 /m3 )
0
5
10
15
2 000 4 000 6 000 8 000 10 000 12 000 14 000 16 000
Gas
Co Methane
Carbon DioxideNitrogen
Gas
Co
Injection
Injection3.5
4
4.5
5
D
CH4 CO2 N2
mD
)
- 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000
Pressure, kPaPressure (kPa)
Preferential adsorption
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
Perm
eabi
lity,
mD
Start
DepletionDisplace with N2
Continued Injection
erm
eabi
lity
(m
Injection
of CH4 induces coal matrix shrinkage resulting in injectivity
SPE 139723 SPE 139723 8
Pressure
0
0.5
1
0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000
Pressure, kPa
P
Pressure (kPa)
g j yimprovement
ECBM Optimization ProcessECBM Optimization Process
• How can injected gas composition be optimizedHow can injected gas composition be optimized to maintain injectivity while sequestering CO2for different coal ranks?
SPE 139723 SPE 139723 9
Model ConstructionModel Construction
• Simulation performed using COMET3Simulation performed using COMET3• 5-spot injection pattern, vertical wells• 10 years of primary production followed by 1510 years of primary production followed by 15
years of injection• Well spacing determined based on CO2Well spacing determined based on CO2
breakthrough occurring after 8 to 10 years of injection (100% CO2 injection scenario)
SPE 139723 SPE 139723 10
Model ConstructionModel Construction
d
Depth 3,000 ft
Thickness 30 ftProducer Thickness 30 ft
Pressure Gradient 0.433 psi/ft
Initial Sw 0.99 fraction
Pd/Pi 1 fraction
Fracture Spacing 1 inch
Sorption Time 10 days
Gas Gravity 0.6 air = 1.0
Injector
Methane Content 1 fraction
Temperature 126˚ ˚F
Water Density 62.4 lbm/ft3
W t Vi it 0 6 cpWater Viscosity 0.6 cp
Producer Skin 0 n/a
Injector Skin -2 n/a
FBHP 25 psi
Corey Constants Swirr 0.1Krw-max 1.0 Krw-shape 2.0Sgr 0.05 Krg-max 0.85 Krg-shape 2.0
Pre-Injection Time (Primary Production) 10 yrs
Max Injection Pressure 1,800 psi
Max Injection Rate 5,000 Mscfd
g p
SPE 139723 SPE 139723
Parametric Study: Porosity and Permeability per Coal RankPermeability per Coal Rank
Parameter High Rank Medium Rank Low Rank Unit
Average Permeability 1 25 100 mD
Permeability Anisotropy 1:2 1:2 1:2Permeability Anisotropy 1:2 1:2 1:2 ‐
Porosity 0.25 0.5 1.5 %
Pore Compressibility 2.00E‐04 4.00E‐04 5.00E‐04 1/psi
Permeability Exponent 3 3 3 ‐
Matrix Compressibility 5.00E‐06 1.00E‐06 5.00E‐07 1/psi
CO2 S lli F 1 25 2 3CO2 Swelling Factor 1.25 2 3 ‐
N2 Swelling Factor 0.5 0.5 0.5 ‐
SPE 139723 SPE 139723 12
Injection ScenariosInjection Scenarios
• Gas mixturesGas mixtures– 100% CO2
– 75% CO2/25% N22 2
– 50% CO2/50% N2
– 25% CO2/75% N2
– 100% N2
• Injection rate constraint: 5MMcfd max• Injection pressure constraint: 1,800psia
maximum bottom-hole pressure
SPE 139723 SPE 139723 13
Low Rank CoalsLow Rank Coals
• 240 acres spacing to reach CO2 breakthrough after240 acres spacing to reach CO2 breakthrough after 10 years of injection
• At end of primary production, permeability was p y p , p ydown from 100 mD to 11 mD: factor of 10 due to high pore compressibility.
• Can we maintain or improve this permeability?
14SPE 139723 SPE 139723
Low Rank Coals – 100% CO2 Injection% 2 j2,500,000
Cum C1 Production, MSCF
C G P d ti MSCF
6000
N2 Injection Rate, MSCFD
CO2 I j ti R t MSCFD
1 500 000
2,000,000
on, M
cf
Cum Gas Production, MSCF
Cum C1 Prod, Mscf, No Injection Cumulative Injected CO2: 5.2BcfIncremental CH4 production: 167MMcf
4000
5000
scfd
CO2 Injection Rate, MSCFD
Cum Injection: 5.2 BcfInjectivity loss
100
120
D
1,000,000
1,500,000
Cumulative Prod
uctio
2000
3000
Injection Ra
te, M
60
80
ermeability, mD
1
0
500,000
C
0
1000
1- High pore compressibility 20
40Average Pe
20
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000
Days
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000
Days
1 High pore compressibility2- CO2 differential swelling
0
20
0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000
Days
Low Rank Coals – 100% N2 Injection2 j30,000,000
Cum C1 Production, MSCF 6000
25,000,000
Cum Gas Production, MSCF
Cum C1 Prod, Mscf, No Injection
177 MMcf incremental CH4100
120
5000
6000
N2 Injection Rate, MSCFD
CO2 Injection Rate, MSCFD
15,000,000
20,000,000
rodu
ction, M
cf
Nitrogen breakthrough60
80
y, mD
14000
ate, M
scfd
Maximum injection rate reached due to permeability
10,000,000
15,000,000
Cumulative Pr Nitrogen breakthrough
20
40age Pe
rmeability
2
1- High pore compressibility2000
3000
Injection Ra increase: matrix shrinkage and
reservoir pressurization
5,000,0000
0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000
Aver
Days
2- Matrix shrinkage under N2differential swelling1000
0
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000
Days16
0
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000
Days
Low Rank Coals - Mixtures
1201- Permeability
Low Rank Coals Mixtures
100
D 50%N2/ 50%CO2
increase at beginning of
injection if ~50% nitrogen is injected
60
80
rmeability, m 75%N2/ 25% CO2
25%N2/75% CO2
(high Cp)
2- Permeability decreases due to
40
Average Pe
r
1
2
coal swelling as N2departs from
fractures and CO2is adsorbed
0
20
0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000
Days17SPE 139723 SPE 139723
Low Rank Coals - Summaryy
• CO2 sequestration optimum with 100% CO2 butCO2 sequestration optimum with 100% CO2 but lowest incremental CH4
• Trial and error found the best mixture at 40% N2/ % 260% CO2– 269 MMcf incremental methane– 3.8 Bcf sequestered CO2
– Above 40% N2, no additional incremental recovery
100% CO2 25%N2/75% CO2 50%N2/ 50%CO2 75%N2/ 25% CO2 100% N2
Incremental CH4, MMcf 167 249 260 177 177
Breakthrough Time, years 10 3.5 4 Not reached (25% n/aBreakthrough Time, years 10 3.5 4@ 15 years)
n/a
Sequestered CO2 at breakthrough time, Bcf 5.2 4.4 3.3 2.1 n/a
18SPE 139723 SPE 139723
Medium Rank CoalsMedium Rank Coals
• 60 acres spacing necessary to achieve60 acres spacing necessary to achieve breakthrough after 10 years of injection
• At end of primary production, permeability down p y p , p yfrom 25 mD to 13 mD: factor of 2 (average Cp and Cm).
• Can we maintain or improve this permeability?
19SPE 139723 SPE 139723
Medium Rank CoalsMedium Rank Coals40
1- Coal swelling
Optimum solution30
35
mD 3
1- Coal swelling2- No permeability increase as for low rank (average Cp)
100% CO2 25%N2/75% CO2 50%N2/ 50%CO2 75%N2/ 25% CO2 100% N220
25
Perm
eability,
50%N2/ 50%CO2
25%N2/ 75% CO2
75%N2/25%CO2
3- Rapid reservoir re-pressurization
/ / /
Incremental CH4, MMcf 92 127 144 99 99
Breakthrough Time, years 10 4 2 Not reached 25% @ 15 years
n/a10
15
Average 75%N2/25%CO2
100% CO2
100%N2
2
1
Sequestered CO2 at breakthrough time, Bcf 1.2 1.4 1.3 1.0 n/a
0
5
0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000
20SPE 139723 SPE 139723
Days
High Rank CoalsHigh Rank Coals
• Due to their high matrix compressibilityDue to their high matrix compressibility, high rank coals were difficult to model
Nominal spacing of 40 acres was used– Nominal spacing of 40 acres was used• At end of primary production, permeability
was up from 1 mD to 9 mDwas up from 1 mD to 9 mD
High matrix Low poreHigh matrix compressibility
Low pore compressibility
21SPE 139723 SPE 139723
High Rank CoalsHigh Rank Coals1- Dramatic loss in 20
Best mixture
permeability with CO2
14
16
18
ty, m
D
A trend seems to appear: as coal rank increases, more nitrogen ist i ECBM f 40% f l k l t 75% f hi h
100% CO2 25%N2/75% CO2 50%N2/ 50%CO2 75%N2/ 25% CO2 100% N28
10
12
ge Permeabilit
50%N2/ 50%CO2
100%N2
75%N2/ 25%CO2necessary to improve ECBM, from 40% for low rank coals to 75% for highrank coals.
Incremental CH4, MMcf ‐ 35 90 214 214
Breakthrough Time, years Not reached Not reached Not reached Not reached 24% @ 15 years
n/a
S t d CO2 t b kth h ti B f 0 01 0 08 0 1 0 9 /2
4
6
Averag
25%N2/75%CO2
100% CO21
Sequestered CO2 at breakthrough time, Bcf 0.01 0.08 0.1 0.9 n/a0
0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000
Days
22SPE 139723 SPE 139723
Summary: Optimum CompositionSummary: Optimum Composition100% CO2 25%N2/75% CO2 50%N2/ 50%CO2 75%N2/ 25% CO2 100% N2LOW RANK 40%N2/60% CO2
Incremental CH4, MMcf 167 249 260 177 177
Breakthrough Time, years 10 3.5 4 Not reached (25% @ 15 years)
n/a
S t d CO2 t b kth h ti B f 5 2 4 4 3 3 2 1 /3 8
269
100% CO2 25%N2/75% CO2 50%N2/ 50%CO2 75%N2/ 25% CO2 100% N2
I l CH4 MM f 92 127 144 99 99
Sequestered CO2 at breakthrough time, Bcf 5.2 4.4 3.3 2.1 n/a3.8
Incremental CH4, MMcf 92 127 144 99 99
Breakthrough Time, years 10 4 2 Not reached 25% @ 15 years
n/a
Sequestered CO2 at breakthrough time Bcf 1 2 1 4 1 3 1 0 n/aSequestered CO2 at breakthrough time, Bcf 1.2 1.4 1.3 1.0 n/a
100% CO2 25%N2/75% CO2 50%N2/ 50%CO2 75%N2/ 25% CO2 100% N2
Incremental CH4, MMcf ‐ 35 90 214 214
HIGH RANK
23SPE 139723 SPE 139723
Incremental CH4, MMcf 35 90 214 214
Breakthrough Time, years Not reached Not reached Not reached Not reached 24% @ 15 years
n/a
Sequestered CO2 at breakthrough time, Bcf 0.01 0.08 0.1 0.9 n/a
ConclusionsConclusions
• For a specific coal rank, ECBM can drastically improvep y pby increasing N2 content in the injected gas stream.
• ECBM due to high N2 content will increase up to amaximum N2 concentration, or threshold: besides thismaximum N2 concentration, or threshold: besides thisthreshold, breakthrough occurs too rapidly to generateadditional methane recovery.
• This N threshold varies between coal ranks as• This N2 threshold varies between coal ranks, aspressure dependant parameters also vary relative to therank.A t d t l k i• A trend seems to appear: as coal rank increases,more nitrogen is necessary to improve ECBM, from40% for low rank coals to 75% for high rank coals.
24SPE 139723 SPE 139723
ConclusionsConclusions• By injecting a 100% nitrogen mixture in medium rank
l l t bilit i i d b d i iti lcoals, cleat permeability is improved beyond initialconditions due to reservoir pressurization. Sameconclusion can be drawn from high rank coals.Laboratory measurement necessary to better understandLaboratory measurement necessary to better understandphysical phenomenon behind it.
25SPE 139723 SPE 139723